The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 818 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 9843 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 1230 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PACU ACUERDO CON PDTE ZEDILLO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 173 34.5 34.5 34.5 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 51 10.1 10.1 44.6 DESACUERDO EN PARTE 3 19 3.9 3.9 48.5 DESACUERDO 4 206 41.1 41.1 89.6 NS/NC 5 52 10.4 10.4 100.0 0 0 .0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 501 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 CONCLUSION CASO AGUAS BLCAS, GRO(NAL) 29/FEB/96 TELEF 2/29/96 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN FRECPOND.LST PCTR GOB EZP TIENE RIENDAS DEL PAIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TIENE LAS RIENDAS 1 137 27.3 27.3 27.3 ESTAN SALIENDO CONTR 2 302 60.3 60.3 87.6 NS/NC 3 62 12.4 12.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 501 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1_1 ACTIV REALIZO DOMINGO: LEYO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 52 10.3 10.3 10.3 NO MENCION 2 449 89.7 89.7 100.0 0 0 .0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 501 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1_2 ACTIV REALIZO DOMINGO: VIO TV Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 218 43.5 43.5 43.5 NO MENCION 2 283 56.5 56.5 100.0 0 0 .0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 501 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 CONCLUSION CASO AGUAS BLCAS, GRO(NAL) 29/FEB/96 TELEF 2/29/96 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN FRECPOND.LST P1_3 ACTIV REALIZO DOMINGO: CENO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 183 36.5 36.7 36.7 NO MENCION 2 316 63.0 63.3 100.0 0 2 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 498 Missing cases 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1A ¿QUE PROGRAMA VIO USTED? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent REGISTRADO EN PAPEL 1 139 27.7 63.6 63.6 NS/NC 2 79 15.9 36.4 100.0 0 283 56.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 218 Missing cases 283 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 HA VISTO ALGUN PROGRAMA DE RICARDO ROCHA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 151 30.2 30.2 30.2 NO 2 347 69.2 69.2 99.4 NC 3 3 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 501 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 CONCLUSION CASO AGUAS BLCAS, GRO(NAL) 29/FEB/96 TELEF 2/29/96 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN FRECPOND.LST P2_1 ¿DE QUE TRATO EL PROGRAMA QUE VIO? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CONASUPO Y RS 1 5 .9 3.0 3.0 MATANZA CAMPESINOS 2 68 13.5 44.6 47.6 TABASCO 3 4 .9 2.9 50.6 OTRO 4 38 7.5 24.8 75.4 NS/NC 5 37 7.4 24.6 100.0 0 350 69.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 151 Missing cases 350 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2_2 ¿COMO CALIF/ESTE TIPO DE PROGRAMAS? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent REFLEJAN LA VERDAD 1 106 21.1 70.0 70.0 EXAGERAN VS GOBIERNO 2 16 3.1 10.4 80.4 NS/NC 3 30 5.9 19.6 100.0 0 350 69.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 151 Missing cases 350 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4_1 ACTUACION GOB: CASO COLOSIO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BIEN 1 48 9.6 9.6 9.6 REGULAR 2 23 4.6 4.6 14.2 MAL 3 414 82.6 82.6 96.8 NS/NC 4 16 3.2 3.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 501 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 CONCLUSION CASO AGUAS BLCAS, GRO(NAL) 29/FEB/96 TELEF 2/29/96 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN FRECPOND.LST P4_2 ACTUACION GOB: CASO AGUAS BLANCAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BIEN 1 33 6.7 6.7 6.7 REGULAR 2 26 5.2 5.2 11.8 MAL 3 391 78.0 78.0 89.8 NS/NC 4 51 10.2 10.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 501 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4_3 ACTUACION GOB: CASO MASSIEU Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BIEN 1 32 6.4 6.4 6.4 REGULAR 2 26 5.1 5.1 11.5 MAL 3 411 82.0 82.0 93.4 NS/NC 4 33 6.6 6.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 501 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 SABE OCURRIO ALGO INVES/AGUAS BLANCAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 138 27.6 27.6 27.6 NO 2 351 70.0 70.1 97.7 NC 3 11 2.3 2.3 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 CONCLUSION CASO AGUAS BLCAS, GRO(NAL) 29/FEB/96 TELEF 2/29/96 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN FRECPOND.LST P5_1 SI ¿QUE? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GOB DECLARADO LIBRE 1 66 13.1 47.4 47.4 OTRO 2 50 9.9 36.0 83.4 NS/NC 3 23 4.6 16.6 100.0 0 363 72.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 138 Missing cases 363 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6 FISCAL AGUAS B DECLARO LIBRE RESP/GOB Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YA ESTABA ENTERADO 1 182 36.3 41.7 41.7 NO ESTABA ENTERADO 2 254 50.6 58.3 100.0 NS/NC 3 0 .0 .0 100.0 0 66 13.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 435 Missing cases 66 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7 ¿QUE SENSACION DEJA ESTA NOTICIA? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent REGISTRADO EN PAPEL 1 211 42.1 85.3 85.3 NS/NC 2 36 7.3 14.7 100.0 0 254 50.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 247 Missing cases 254 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 CONCLUSION CASO AGUAS BLCAS, GRO(NAL) 29/FEB/96 TELEF 2/29/96 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN FRECPOND.LST P8 QUIEN RESPONSABLE DE ESTE ENFRENTAMINETO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LOS CAMPESINOS 1 1 .2 .2 .2 POLICIA DE ESTADO 2 40 7.9 7.9 8.1 EL GOBERNADOR 3 133 26.6 26.6 34.7 EXDIREC/POLIC ESTATA 4 3 .5 .5 35.2 EXSRIO DE GOB 5 4 .8 .8 36.1 EXPROCURADOR JUST ED 6 2 .4 .4 36.5 OTRO 7 71 14.3 14.3 50.8 NS/NC 8 246 49.1 49.2 100.0 0 1 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9 CREE FUNCIONARIOS RESPONSABLES ASESINATO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SON RESPONSABLES 1 318 63.5 63.5 63.5 NO SON RESPONSABLES 2 54 10.9 10.9 74.4 NS/NC 3 128 25.6 25.6 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P10 ENFRENT/PROVOCARON POLICIAS INIC/PROPIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent X INICIATIVA PROPIA 1 84 16.7 16.7 16.7 POR ORDENES GOB 2 290 57.9 57.9 74.6 NS/NC 3 127 25.4 25.4 100.0 0 0 .0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 501 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 CONCLUSION CASO AGUAS BLCAS, GRO(NAL) 29/FEB/96 TELEF 2/29/96 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN FRECPOND.LST P11 PDTE TIENE VOLUNTAD ACLARE ASN/CAMPESINO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TIENE LA VOLUNTAD 1 270 53.9 53.9 53.9 NO TIENE VOLUNTAD 2 182 36.3 36.3 90.2 NS/NC 3 49 9.8 9.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 501 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P12 PARTICIAPACION PDTE HA SIDO SUFICIENTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SUFICIENTE 1 121 24.2 24.2 24.2 INSUFICIENTE 2 329 65.7 65.7 89.9 NS/NC 3 50 10.1 10.1 100.0 0 0 .0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 501 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P13 A QUE SE DEBEN ECHOS DE VIOLENCIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PROBLEMAS ENTRE NARC 1 24 4.7 4.7 4.7 PROBLEMAS POLITICOS 2 91 18.1 18.1 22.8 AMBOS 3 3 .6 .6 23.4 OTRO 4 244 48.7 48.7 72.1 NS/NC 5 140 27.9 27.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 501 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 CONCLUSION CASO AGUAS BLCAS, GRO(NAL) 29/FEB/96 TELEF 2/29/96 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN FRECPOND.LST P14 SIENTE AMENAZADA LA SEGURIDAD DEL PAIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 340 67.9 68.0 68.0 NO 2 137 27.4 27.4 95.5 NS/NC 3 23 4.5 4.5 100.0 0 1 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P15 EN LO PERSONAL SIENTE AMENAZADA SU SEG Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 230 46.0 46.0 46.0 NO 2 258 51.4 51.4 97.4 NS/NC 3 13 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 501 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P16 CREE GOB GRO DEBE RENUNCIAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEBE RENUNCIAR 1 251 50.2 50.2 50.2 DEBE CONTINUAR 2 138 27.5 27.5 77.6 NS/NC 3 112 22.4 22.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 501 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 CONCLUSION CASO AGUAS BLCAS, GRO(NAL) 29/FEB/96 TELEF 2/29/96 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN FRECPOND.LST POPI OPINION PDTE ZEDILLO MEJORO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJORO 1 121 24.1 24.2 24.2 NO CAMBIO 2 132 26.3 26.3 50.5 EMPEORO 3 183 36.6 36.7 87.2 NS/NC 4 64 12.8 12.8 100.0 0 1 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PSIM SIMPATIZA CANDIDATOS ELEC 94 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DFC DEL PAN 1 174 34.7 34.7 34.7 EZP DEL PRI 2 124 24.9 24.9 59.5 CCS DEL PRD 3 73 14.6 14.6 74.1 OTRO 4 3 .6 .6 74.8 NINGUNO 5 98 19.6 19.6 94.3 NS/NC 6 28 5.7 5.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 501 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 242 48.2 48.2 48.2 femenino 2 259 51.8 51.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 501 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 CONCLUSION CASO AGUAS BLCAS, GRO(NAL) 29/FEB/96 TELEF 2/29/96 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN FRECPOND.LST EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 158 31.6 31.6 31.6 26-40 2 179 35.7 35.7 67.2 41-60 3 115 23.0 23.0 90.2 61 + 4 49 9.8 9.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 501 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INST Institución donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 270 54.0 54.0 54.0 gob fed 2 28 5.6 5.6 59.5 paraestatal 3 3 .6 .6 60.2 emp priv 4 83 16.5 16.5 76.7 negocio prop 5 52 10.4 10.4 87.1 independiente 6 65 12.9 12.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 501 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 159 31.7 58.8 58.8 estudiante 2 79 15.8 29.3 88.0 jubilado 3 14 2.8 5.3 93.3 desemp 4 13 2.5 4.7 98.0 otro 5 5 1.1 2.0 100.0 0 231 46.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 270 Missing cases 231 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 CONCLUSION CASO AGUAS BLCAS, GRO(NAL) 29/FEB/96 TELEF 2/29/96 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN FRECPOND.LST ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 3 .6 .6 .6 ninguno 1 10 1.9 1.9 2.5 prim inc 2 34 6.8 6.8 9.3 prim comp 3 64 12.8 12.8 22.1 sec incom 4 14 2.7 2.7 24.8 sec comp 5 116 23.1 23.1 47.9 prep incom 6 53 10.5 10.5 58.4 prep comp 7 71 14.2 14.2 72.6 univ incom 8 71 14.2 14.2 86.8 univ comp + 9 66 13.2 13.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 501 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 30 6.0 7.6 7.6 1-3 sm 2 118 23.6 29.9 37.6 3-5 sm 3 139 27.7 35.2 72.8 5-7 sm 4 57 11.5 14.6 87.3 7-10 5 27 5.3 6.8 94.1 10 + SM 6 23 4.7 5.9 100.0 0 106 21.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 501 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 395 Missing cases 106 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 CONCLUSION CASO AGUAS BLCAS, GRO(NAL) 29/FEB/96 TELEF 2/29/96 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN FRECPOND.LST This procedure was completed at 20:09:04 End of Include file.