The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 355 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 7196 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 899 Value Labels for each Variable. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 4 ROLL OVER (5) JALISCO 5/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL50295.FR1 P1 SITUACION ECONOMICA COMUNIDAD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 23 6.5 6.5 6.5 Igual 2 28 7.9 7.9 14.4 Peor 3 299 84.2 84.2 98.6 No sabe 4 5 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 355 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 SATISFECHO CON NIVEL DE VIDA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 116 32.7 32.7 32.7 Si parte 2 70 19.7 19.7 52.4 No 3 168 47.3 47.3 99.7 No contestó 4 1 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 355 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PEST6 QUIEN LE INSPIRA CONFIANZA... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 142 40.0 40.1 40.1 A Cárdenas J 2 118 33.2 33.3 73.4 Mario Saucedo 3 14 3.9 4.0 77.4 Ninguno 4 33 9.3 9.3 86.7 No sabe 5 41 11.5 11.6 98.3 No contestó 6 6 1.7 1.7 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 5 ROLL OVER (5) JALISCO 5/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL50295.FR1 P4 SITUACION ECON PROX AÑO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 164 46.2 46.3 46.3 Igual 2 39 11.0 11.0 57.3 Peor 3 98 27.6 27.7 85.0 No sabe 4 49 13.8 13.8 98.9 No contestó 5 4 1.1 1.1 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 QUIEN PARA PROX GOBERNADOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 141 39.7 39.7 39.7 A Cárdenas J 2 125 35.2 35.2 74.9 Mario Saucedo 3 16 4.5 4.5 79.4 Ninguno 4 11 3.1 3.1 82.5 No sabe 5 51 14.4 14.4 96.9 No contestó 6 11 3.1 3.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 355 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 6 ROLL OVER (5) JALISCO 5/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL50295.FR1 P6 SITUACION ECONOMICA FAMILIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 54 15.2 15.3 15.3 Igual 2 74 20.8 20.9 36.2 Peor 3 219 61.7 61.9 98.0 No sabe 4 6 1.7 1.7 99.7 No contestó 5 1 .3 .3 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE7 SI HOY ELECC JAL POR QUIEN VOTA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Eugenio Ruiz PRI 1 130 36.6 36.6 36.6 A Cárdenas J PAN 2 128 36.1 36.1 72.7 M Saucedo PRD 3 15 4.2 4.2 76.9 Ninguno 5 14 3.9 3.9 80.8 No sabe 6 49 13.8 13.8 94.6 No contestó 7 19 5.4 5.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 355 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7_1 ACUERDO CON..Pte de la República Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Acuerdo 1 139 39.2 39.2 39.2 Desacuerdo 2 130 36.6 36.6 75.8 No sabe 3 78 22.0 22.0 97.7 No contestó 4 8 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 355 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 ROLL OVER (5) JALISCO 5/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL50295.FR1 P7_2 ACUERDO CON..Gobernador Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Acuerdo 1 180 50.7 50.7 50.7 Desacuerdo 2 127 35.8 35.8 86.5 No sabe 3 43 12.1 12.1 98.6 No contestó 4 5 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 355 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7_3 ACUERDO CON..Pdte. Municipal Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Acuerdo 1 156 43.9 44.1 44.1 Desacuerdo 2 139 39.2 39.3 83.3 No sabe 3 50 14.1 14.1 97.5 No contestó 4 9 2.5 2.5 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL1 VOTOS A..Eugenio Ruiz O PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 35 9.9 17.9 17.9 DOS 2 40 11.3 20.5 38.5 TRES 3 44 12.4 22.6 61.0 CUATRO 4 3 .8 1.5 62.6 CINCO 5 73 20.6 37.4 100.0 0 160 45.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 195 Missing cases 160 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 ROLL OVER (5) JALISCO 5/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL50295.FR1 PBOL2 VOTOS A..Alberto Cárdenas PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 36 10.1 17.8 17.8 DOS 2 45 12.7 22.3 40.1 TRES 3 45 12.7 22.3 62.4 CUATRO 4 9 2.5 4.5 66.8 CINCO 5 67 18.9 33.2 100.0 0 153 43.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 202 Missing cases 153 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL3 VOTOS A..Mario Saucedo PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 62 17.5 70.5 70.5 DOS 2 16 4.5 18.2 88.6 TRES 3 4 1.1 4.5 93.2 CUATRO 4 1 .3 1.1 94.3 CINCO 5 5 1.4 5.7 100.0 0 267 75.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 88 Missing cases 267 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL4 VOTOS A..Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 11 3.1 50.0 50.0 DOS 2 7 2.0 31.8 81.8 CUATRO 4 1 .3 4.5 86.4 CINCO 5 3 .8 13.6 100.0 0 333 93.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 22 Missing cases 333 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 ROLL OVER (5) JALISCO 5/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL50295.FR1 PBOL5 VOTOS A..A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DOS 2 1 .3 7.1 7.1 CUATRO 4 1 .3 7.1 14.3 CINCO 5 12 3.4 85.7 100.0 0 341 96.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 14 Missing cases 341 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL6 VOTOS A..No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 .6 4.0 4.0 DOS 2 1 .3 2.0 6.0 CINCO 5 47 13.2 94.0 100.0 0 305 85.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 50 Missing cases 305 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL7 VOTOS A..No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 7 2.0 100.0 100.0 0 348 98.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 7 Missing cases 348 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 ROLL OVER (5) JALISCO 5/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL50295.FR1 PATR1 QUIEN ES..Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 136 38.3 38.3 38.3 Alberto Cardenas 2 75 21.1 21.1 59.4 Mario Saucedo 3 15 4.2 4.2 63.7 Ninguno 4 5 1.4 1.4 65.1 No Sabe/No C 5 124 34.9 34.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 355 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2 QUIEN ES..Más experiencia Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 182 51.3 51.3 51.3 Alberto Cardenas 2 77 21.7 21.7 73.0 Mario Saucedo 3 8 2.3 2.3 75.2 Ninguno 4 13 3.7 3.7 78.9 No Sabe/No C 5 75 21.1 21.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 355 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR3 QUIEN ES..Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 156 43.9 43.9 43.9 Alberto Cardenas 2 95 26.8 26.8 70.7 Mario Saucedo 3 12 3.4 3.4 74.1 Ninguno 4 5 1.4 1.4 75.5 No Sabe/No C 5 87 24.5 24.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 355 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 ROLL OVER (5) JALISCO 5/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL50295.FR1 PATR4 QUIEN ES..Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 152 42.8 42.8 42.8 Alberto Cardenas 2 108 30.4 30.4 73.2 Mario Saucedo 3 11 3.1 3.1 76.3 Ninguno 4 12 3.4 3.4 79.7 No Sabe/No C 5 72 20.3 20.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 355 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR5 QUIEN ES..Mejor opción para edo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 118 33.2 33.2 33.2 Alberto Cardenas 2 141 39.7 39.7 73.0 Mario Saucedo 3 14 3.9 3.9 76.9 Ninguno 4 7 2.0 2.0 78.9 No Sabe/No C 5 75 21.1 21.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 355 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6 QUIEN ES..Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 87 24.5 24.5 24.5 Alberto Cardenas 2 101 28.5 28.5 53.0 Mario Saucedo 3 8 2.3 2.3 55.2 Ninguno 4 35 9.9 9.9 65.1 No Sabe/No C 5 124 34.9 34.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 355 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 ROLL OVER (5) JALISCO 5/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL50295.FR1 PATR7 QUIEN ES..Más personalidad Gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 154 43.4 43.4 43.4 Alberto Cardenas 2 106 29.9 29.9 73.2 Mario Saucedo 3 10 2.8 2.8 76.1 Ninguno 4 9 2.5 2.5 78.6 No Sabe/No C 5 76 21.4 21.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 355 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8 QUIEN ES..Puede resolver pobreza Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 104 29.3 29.3 29.3 Alberto Cardenas 2 95 26.8 26.8 56.1 Mario Saucedo 3 10 2.8 2.8 58.9 Ninguno 4 53 14.9 14.9 73.8 No Sabe/No C 5 93 26.2 26.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 355 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR9 QUIEN ES..Habla mas con verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 100 28.2 28.2 28.2 Alberto Cardenas 2 115 32.4 32.5 60.7 Mario Saucedo 3 12 3.4 3.4 64.1 Ninguno 4 29 8.2 8.2 72.3 No Sabe/No C 5 98 27.6 27.7 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 ROLL OVER (5) JALISCO 5/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL50295.FR1 P8 CUALIDAD PARA EL PROXIMO GOBERNADOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXPERIENCIA-INTELIG 1 126 35.5 35.6 35.6 OPCION DE CAMBIO 2 189 53.2 53.4 89.0 NINGUNA 3 8 2.3 2.3 91.2 NS-NC 4 31 8.7 8.8 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 178 50.1 50.1 50.1 femenino 2 176 49.6 49.6 99.7 3 1 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 355 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 75 21.1 21.1 21.1 26-40 2 158 44.5 44.5 65.6 41-60 3 91 25.6 25.6 91.3 61 + 4 31 8.7 8.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 355 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 ROLL OVER (5) JALISCO 5/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL50295.FR1 INST Institución donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 146 41.1 41.1 41.1 gob fed 2 32 9.0 9.0 50.1 paraestatal 3 8 2.3 2.3 52.4 emp priv 4 91 25.6 25.6 78.0 negocio prop 5 39 11.0 11.0 89.0 independiente 6 39 11.0 11.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 355 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 98 27.6 67.1 67.1 estudiante 2 20 5.6 13.7 80.8 jubilado 3 13 3.7 8.9 89.7 desemp 4 7 2.0 4.8 94.5 otro 5 8 2.3 5.5 100.0 0 209 58.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 146 Missing cases 209 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 ROLL OVER (5) JALISCO 5/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL50295.FR1 ACTIV Rama de actividad económica Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent agric 1 6 1.7 2.9 2.9 industria 2 21 5.9 10.0 12.9 comercio 3 54 15.2 25.8 38.8 construc 4 7 2.0 3.3 42.1 educación 5 17 4.8 8.1 50.2 otros servs 6 104 29.3 49.8 100.0 0 146 41.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 209 Missing cases 146 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUESTO Que puesto ocupa en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario, Patron o 1 21 5.9 10.0 10.0 Directivo o Func de 2 10 2.8 4.8 14.8 Contratista o trabaj 3 46 13.0 22.0 36.8 Profesionista Indepe 4 18 5.1 8.6 45.5 Emplea, trabaj, Obre 5 112 31.5 53.6 99.0 trabajador sin pago 6 2 .6 1.0 100.0 0 146 41.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 209 Missing cases 146 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 ROLL OVER (5) JALISCO 5/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL50295.FR1 ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 13 3.7 3.7 3.7 prim inc 2 26 7.3 7.3 11.0 prim comp 3 62 17.5 17.5 28.5 sec incom 4 9 2.5 2.5 31.0 sec comp 5 75 21.1 21.1 52.1 prep incom 6 18 5.1 5.1 57.2 prep comp 7 49 13.8 13.8 71.0 univ incom 8 27 7.6 7.6 78.6 univ comp + 9 76 21.4 21.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 355 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 28 7.9 7.9 7.9 1-3 sm 2 71 20.0 20.0 27.9 3-5 sm 3 57 16.1 16.1 43.9 5-7 sm 4 26 7.3 7.3 51.3 7-10 5 39 11.0 11.0 62.3 10 + SM 6 53 14.9 14.9 77.2 7 81 22.8 22.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 355 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 355 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 ROLL OVER (5) JALISCO 5/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL50295.FR1 This procedure was completed at 12:38:47 End of Include file.