The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 86 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 9842 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 1230 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1 SITUACION DEL PAIS MEJOR? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 21 23.9 23.9 23.9 Igual (voluntario) 2 19 21.8 21.8 45.8 Peor 3 43 50.2 50.2 96.0 No sabe 4 3 4.0 4.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 SATISFECHO CON EL NIVEL DE VIDA ACTUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 35 40.4 40.4 40.4 Si en parte 2 13 14.8 14.8 55.2 No 3 39 44.8 44.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 6 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE P3 CANDIDATO INSPIRA MAS CONFIANZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas 1 9 10.7 10.8 10.8 Ernesto Zedillo 2 27 31.0 31.3 42.1 Diego Fdez. de Ceval 3 29 33.4 33.8 75.9 Ninguno 4 7 8.3 8.4 84.3 No sabe 5 6 7.2 7.3 91.6 No contestó 6 7 8.3 8.4 100.0 . 1 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 85 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4 PRECIOS DE COMPRA HABITALES MAS ALTOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Son más altos 1 65 75.4 75.4 75.4 No han cambiado 2 18 21.5 21.5 96.9 Son más bajos 3 1 1.0 1.0 97.9 No sabe 4 2 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 SIT ECONOMICA PERSONAL MEJOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 40 46.8 47.3 47.3 Igual (voluntario) 2 11 13.2 13.3 60.6 Peor 3 11 13.0 13.1 73.7 No sabe 4 22 26.0 26.3 100.0 . 1 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 85 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE P6 QUIEN GUSTARIA FUERA PROXIMO PTE REP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas 1 9 11.0 11.0 11.0 Ernesto Zedillo 2 23 27.0 27.0 38.0 Diego Fdez. de Ceval 3 36 41.5 41.5 79.6 Otro 4 2 2.6 2.6 82.2 No sabe 5 9 10.6 10.6 92.8 No contestó 6 6 7.2 7.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7 COMO CONSID SIT ECONOM ACTUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 28 32.2 32.2 32.2 Igual (voluntario) 2 28 32.8 32.8 65.0 Peor 3 30 35.0 35.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8 ACUERDO FORMA DE GOBERNAR PRESIDENTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent De acuerdo 1 44 51.4 51.4 51.4 De acuerdo en parte 2 22 25.7 25.7 77.1 En desacuerdo 3 14 16.6 16.6 93.7 No sabe 4 2 1.8 1.8 95.6 No contestó 5 4 4.4 4.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PATR1 Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 6 7.2 7.2 7.2 Zedillo 2 18 20.4 20.4 27.6 Cevallos 3 38 44.2 44.2 71.8 Ninguno 4 3 4.0 4.0 75.7 NS-NC 5 21 24.3 24.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2 mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 12 14.0 14.0 14.0 Zedillo 2 24 27.5 27.5 41.5 Cevallos 3 31 36.1 36.1 77.6 Ninguno 4 3 3.4 3.4 81.0 NS-NC 5 16 19.0 19.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR3 Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 6 7.1 7.2 7.2 Zedillo 2 11 12.2 12.4 19.5 Cevallos 3 55 63.4 64.1 83.7 Ninguno 4 1 .8 .8 84.4 NS-NC 5 13 15.4 15.6 100.0 0 1 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 85 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PATR4 Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 20 23.1 23.4 23.4 Zedillo 2 26 30.2 30.6 54.0 Cevallos 3 23 27.0 27.3 81.2 Ninguno 4 4 4.9 5.0 86.2 NS-NC 5 12 13.6 13.8 100.0 0 1 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 85 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR5 Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 8 9.2 9.3 9.3 Zedillo 2 28 32.0 32.4 41.6 Cevallos 3 24 28.1 28.4 70.0 Ninguno 4 3 3.7 3.7 73.8 NS-NC 5 22 26.0 26.2 100.0 0 1 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 85 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PATR6 Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 8 9.4 9.5 9.5 Zedillo 2 14 16.6 16.8 26.2 Cevallos 3 18 20.5 20.8 47.0 Ninguno 4 8 9.5 9.6 56.6 NS-NC 5 37 42.9 43.4 100.0 0 1 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 85 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR7 MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 8 9.1 9.2 9.2 Zedillo 2 26 30.2 30.5 39.7 Cevallos 3 39 45.4 45.9 85.6 Ninguno 4 2 1.8 1.9 87.4 NS-NC 5 11 12.4 12.6 100.0 0 1 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 85 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PATR8 PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 8 9.6 9.7 9.7 Zedillo 2 23 27.1 27.4 37.1 Cevallos 3 22 25.3 25.6 62.8 Ninguno 4 14 16.6 16.7 79.5 NS-NC 5 17 20.3 20.5 100.0 0 1 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 85 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR9 Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 9 10.3 10.4 10.4 Zedillo 2 11 13.1 13.2 23.7 Cevallos 3 28 32.9 33.2 56.9 Ninguno 4 11 13.1 13.3 70.1 NS-NC 5 25 29.5 29.9 100.0 0 1 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 85 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PATR1_A Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 4 4.1 6.3 6.3 Zedillo 2 11 13.3 20.4 26.6 Cevallos 3 24 27.4 41.8 68.5 Ninguno 4 3 4.0 6.1 74.6 NS-NC 5 14 16.6 25.4 100.0 . 30 34.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 56 Missing cases 30 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2_A mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 8 9.4 14.4 14.4 Zedillo 2 10 11.8 18.0 32.4 Cevallos 3 22 25.2 38.6 71.0 Ninguno 4 2 2.6 4.0 75.0 NS-NC 5 14 16.4 25.0 100.0 . 30 34.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 56 Missing cases 30 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PATR3_A Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 4 4.6 7.1 7.1 Zedillo 2 6 7.2 11.1 18.3 Cevallos 3 31 36.4 56.6 74.9 Ninguno 4 1 .8 1.2 76.1 NS-NC 5 13 15.4 23.9 100.0 . 31 35.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 55 Missing cases 31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR4_A Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 12 14.5 22.6 22.6 Zedillo 2 11 13.2 20.5 43.1 Cevallos 3 17 19.9 30.9 74.0 Ninguno 4 3 3.9 6.0 80.0 NS-NC 5 11 12.9 20.0 100.0 . 31 35.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 55 Missing cases 31 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PATR5_A Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 4 4.9 7.6 7.6 Zedillo 2 16 18.1 28.1 35.6 Cevallos 3 18 21.3 33.0 68.7 Ninguno 4 3 2.9 4.5 73.2 NS-NC 5 15 17.2 26.8 100.0 . 31 35.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 55 Missing cases 31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6_A Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 5 5.8 9.1 9.1 Zedillo 2 6 7.0 10.9 20.0 Cevallos 3 13 15.0 23.4 43.4 Ninguno 4 6 7.5 11.7 55.0 NS-NC 5 25 28.9 45.0 100.0 . 31 35.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 55 Missing cases 31 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PATR7_A MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 4 4.8 7.4 7.4 Zedillo 2 16 19.1 29.7 37.2 Cevallos 3 24 28.0 43.5 80.7 Ninguno 4 1 1.1 1.6 82.3 NS-NC 5 10 11.4 17.7 100.0 . 31 35.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 55 Missing cases 31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8_A PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 5 6.1 9.5 9.5 Zedillo 2 14 16.4 25.5 35.0 Cevallos 3 12 13.9 21.6 56.6 Ninguno 4 9 10.3 15.9 72.5 NS-NC 5 15 17.7 27.5 100.0 . 31 35.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 55 Missing cases 31 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PATR9_A Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 6 6.8 10.6 10.6 Zedillo 2 9 10.3 16.1 26.6 Cevallos 3 16 19.1 29.7 56.3 Ninguno 4 9 10.4 16.1 72.4 NS-NC 5 15 17.7 27.6 100.0 . 31 35.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 55 Missing cases 31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR1_B Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 3 3.1 8.9 8.9 Zedillo 2 6 7.0 20.4 29.3 Cevallos 3 14 16.8 48.6 77.9 NS-NC 5 7 7.6 22.1 100.0 . 56 65.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 30 Missing cases 56 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2_B mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 4 4.6 13.4 13.4 Zedillo 2 13 15.7 45.3 58.7 Cevallos 3 9 10.9 31.5 90.2 Ninguno 4 1 .8 2.2 92.5 NS-NC 5 2 2.6 7.5 100.0 . 56 65.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 30 Missing cases 56 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PATR3_B Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 2 2.5 7.3 7.3 Zedillo 2 4 5.1 14.6 21.9 Cevallos 3 23 27.0 78.1 100.0 . 56 65.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 30 Missing cases 56 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR4_B Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 7 8.6 24.9 24.9 Zedillo 2 15 17.0 49.3 74.1 Cevallos 3 6 7.1 20.5 94.7 Ninguno 4 1 1.1 3.1 97.8 NS-NC 5 1 .8 2.2 100.0 . 56 65.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 30 Missing cases 56 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR5_B Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 4 4.3 12.4 12.4 Zedillo 2 12 14.0 40.4 52.8 Cevallos 3 6 6.8 19.8 72.6 Ninguno 4 1 .8 2.2 74.8 NS-NC 5 7 8.7 25.2 100.0 . 56 65.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 30 Missing cases 56 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PATR6_B Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 3 3.5 10.2 10.2 Zedillo 2 8 9.6 27.7 37.9 Cevallos 3 5 5.5 15.9 53.8 Ninguno 4 2 2.0 5.8 59.6 NS-NC 5 12 14.0 40.4 100.0 . 56 65.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 30 Missing cases 56 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR7_B MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 4 4.3 12.4 12.4 Zedillo 2 9 11.0 31.9 44.3 Cevallos 3 15 17.4 50.4 94.7 Ninguno 4 1 .8 2.2 96.9 NS-NC 5 1 1.1 3.1 100.0 . 56 65.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 30 Missing cases 56 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PATR8_B PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 3 3.5 10.2 10.2 Zedillo 2 9 10.7 31.0 41.2 Cevallos 3 10 11.4 33.1 74.3 Ninguno 4 5 6.3 18.2 92.5 NS-NC 5 2 2.6 7.5 100.0 . 56 65.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 30 Missing cases 56 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR9_B Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 3 3.5 10.2 10.2 Zedillo 2 2 2.8 8.0 18.2 Cevallos 3 12 13.7 39.7 57.9 Ninguno 4 2 2.8 8.0 65.9 NS-NC 5 10 11.8 34.1 100.0 . 56 65.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 30 Missing cases 56 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PVOT1_A VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 4 4.8 21.5 21.5 UNO 1 9 10.1 45.1 66.6 DOS 2 2 1.8 8.2 74.8 TRES 3 1 1.0 4.4 79.2 CINCO 5 4 4.7 20.8 100.0 . 67 77.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 19 Missing cases 67 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT2_A VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 6 6.5 19.9 19.9 DOS 2 8 9.4 28.8 48.7 TRES 3 8 9.8 30.1 78.9 CUATRO 4 2 2.1 6.3 85.2 CINCO 5 4 4.8 14.8 100.0 . 58 67.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 28 Missing cases 58 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PVOT3_A VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 3 3.0 7.2 7.2 UNO 1 7 8.5 20.3 27.5 DOS 2 12 13.6 32.6 60.1 TRES 3 4 4.8 11.4 71.5 CINCO 5 10 11.9 28.5 100.0 . 50 58.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 36 Missing cases 50 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4_A VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 1.0 100.0 100.0 . 85 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 85 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT5_A VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .8 100.0 100.0 . 85 99.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 85 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PVOT6_A VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 3 3.4 66.0 66.0 DOS 2 2 1.8 34.0 100.0 . 82 94.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 82 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7_A VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 1.1 34.5 34.5 CINCO 5 2 2.0 65.5 100.0 . 83 96.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 83 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT8_A VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.1 100.0 100.0 . 85 98.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 85 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PVOT9_A VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 86 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 86 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10_A VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 1.2 100.0 100.0 . 85 98.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 85 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT11_A VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TRES 3 1 .8 26.5 26.5 CUATRO 4 2 2.1 73.5 100.0 . 83 97.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 83 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PVOT12_A VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 86 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 86 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13_A VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 2.0 15.2 15.2 CINCO 5 10 11.3 84.8 100.0 . 75 86.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 11 Missing cases 75 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT1_B VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 3 3.1 14.8 14.8 UNO 1 11 13.3 64.4 79.2 DOS 2 2 2.8 13.3 92.5 CINCO 5 1 1.5 7.5 100.0 . 68 79.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 18 Missing cases 68 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PVOT2_B VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.1 4.0 4.0 UNO 1 8 9.1 33.9 38.0 DOS 2 7 7.8 29.1 67.1 TRES 3 4 5.0 18.7 85.8 CINCO 5 3 3.8 14.2 100.0 . 63 73.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 23 Missing cases 63 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT3_B VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 7 8.6 33.6 33.6 DOS 2 6 7.0 27.6 61.2 TRES 3 5 6.4 24.9 86.1 CUATRO 4 1 1.2 4.9 91.0 CINCO 5 2 2.3 9.0 100.0 . 64 74.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 22 Missing cases 64 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4_B VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 86 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 86 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PVOT5_B VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 86 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 86 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT6_B VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 8 9.6 92.6 92.6 CINCO 5 1 .8 7.4 100.0 . 77 89.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 9 Missing cases 77 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7_B VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 86 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 86 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PVOT8_B VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 86 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 86 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT9_B VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 86 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 86 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10_B VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 1.1 100.0 100.0 . 85 98.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 85 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PVOT11_B VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 1 1.1 100.0 100.0 . 85 98.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 85 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT12_B VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 1 .8 100.0 100.0 . 85 99.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 85 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13_B VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 1 1.1 100.0 100.0 . 85 98.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 85 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PVOT1 VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 56 64.8 64.8 64.8 UNO 1 20 23.4 23.4 88.2 DOS 2 4 4.6 4.6 92.8 TRES 3 1 1.0 1.0 93.8 CINCO 5 5 6.2 6.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT2 VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 36 41.6 41.6 41.6 UNO 1 13 15.6 15.6 57.2 DOS 2 15 17.2 17.2 74.4 TRES 3 13 14.9 14.9 89.3 CUATRO 4 2 2.1 2.1 91.3 CINCO 5 7 8.7 8.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT3 VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 31 35.8 35.8 35.8 UNO 1 15 17.0 17.0 52.8 DOS 2 18 20.6 20.6 73.4 TRES 3 10 11.1 11.1 84.6 CUATRO 4 1 1.2 1.2 85.8 CINCO 5 12 14.2 14.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PVOT4 VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 85 99.0 99.0 99.0 UNO 1 1 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT5 VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 85 99.2 99.2 99.2 UNO 1 1 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT6 VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 73 84.4 84.4 84.4 UNO 1 11 13.0 13.0 97.5 DOS 2 2 1.8 1.8 99.2 CINCO 5 1 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PVOT7 VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 83 96.9 96.9 96.9 UNO 1 1 1.1 1.1 98.0 CINCO 5 2 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT8 VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 86 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT9 VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 86 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 32 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PVOT10 VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 84 97.7 97.7 97.7 UNO 1 2 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT11 VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 83 96.0 96.0 96.0 TRES 3 1 .8 .8 96.8 CUATRO 4 2 2.1 2.1 98.9 CINCO 5 1 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT12 VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 85 99.2 99.2 99.2 CINCO 5 1 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 33 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PVOT13 VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 74 85.6 85.6 85.6 UNO 1 2 2.0 2.0 87.6 CINCO 5 11 12.4 12.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 29 33.8 34.5 34.5 CCS del PRD 2 8 9.2 9.4 43.8 DFC del PAN 3 29 33.2 33.9 77.7 Por ninguno 5 6 7.3 7.4 85.1 No sabe 6 5 5.4 5.5 90.6 No contestó 7 8 9.2 9.4 100.0 0 2 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 84 Missing cases 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE_A SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA A Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 19 21.5 34.0 34.0 CCS del PRD 2 3 3.8 6.0 40.0 DFC del PAN 3 17 19.3 30.4 70.4 Por ninguno 5 6 7.3 11.5 81.9 No sabe 6 2 2.3 3.7 85.5 No contestó 7 8 9.2 14.5 100.0 . 31 36.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 55 Missing cases 31 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 34 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE PELE_B SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA B Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 11 12.2 35.4 35.4 CCS del PRD 2 5 5.4 15.6 50.9 DFC del PAN 3 12 13.9 40.2 91.1 No sabe 6 3 3.1 8.9 100.0 . 56 65.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 30 Missing cases 56 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 40 46.5 46.5 46.5 femenino 2 46 53.5 53.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 25 28.6 28.6 28.6 26-40 2 32 37.6 37.6 66.2 41-60 3 20 23.5 23.5 89.7 61 + 4 9 10.3 10.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 35 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE INST Institución donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 46 53.1 53.1 53.1 gob fed 2 9 10.7 10.7 63.7 paraestatal 3 3 3.8 3.8 67.5 emp priv 4 17 20.3 20.3 87.9 negocio prop 5 2 2.8 2.8 90.7 independiente 6 8 9.3 9.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 23 26.6 50.2 50.2 estudiante 2 11 13.3 25.1 75.3 jubilado 3 4 4.1 7.8 83.1 desemp 4 4 4.8 9.1 92.1 otro 5 4 4.2 7.9 100.0 0 40 46.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 46 Missing cases 40 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 36 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE ACTIV Rama de actividad económica Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent industria 2 3 3.1 6.6 6.6 comercio 3 9 10.2 21.6 28.2 construc 4 1 1.5 3.3 31.5 educación 5 2 2.8 6.0 37.6 otros servs 6 25 29.3 62.4 100.0 0 46 53.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 40 Missing cases 46 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUESTO Que puesto ocupa en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario, Patron o 1 4 4.1 8.8 8.8 Directivo o Func de 2 3 3.4 7.2 16.0 Contratista o trabaj 3 4 5.0 10.7 26.7 Profesionista Indepe 4 2 2.2 4.6 31.3 Emplea, trabaj, Obre 5 27 31.1 66.4 97.7 trabajador sin pago 6 1 1.1 2.3 100.0 0 46 53.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 40 Missing cases 46 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 37 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 ninguno 1 1 1.1 1.1 2.0 prim inc 2 10 11.8 11.8 13.9 prim comp 3 10 11.8 11.8 25.7 sec incom 4 2 2.0 2.0 27.7 sec comp 5 12 14.2 14.2 41.9 prep incom 6 8 8.9 8.9 50.8 prep comp 7 15 17.9 17.9 68.7 univ incom 8 8 9.2 9.2 77.9 univ comp + 9 19 22.1 22.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 4 4.1 4.2 4.2 1-3 sm 2 22 25.9 26.4 30.6 3-5 sm 3 12 13.5 13.8 44.4 5-7 sm 4 3 3.8 3.8 48.2 7-10 5 7 8.0 8.2 56.4 10 + SM 6 22 25.4 25.9 82.4 7 15 17.3 17.6 100.0 . 2 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 86 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 84 Missing cases 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 38 ROLLOVER (78) DF 13/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/13/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLADF.FRE This procedure was completed at 14:46:21 End of Include file.