The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 510 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 5587 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 698 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PACU ACUERDO CON PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 193 37.9 37.9 37.9 ACUERDO PARTE 2 53 10.4 10.4 48.3 DESACUERDO PARTE 3 29 5.6 5.6 53.9 DESACUERDO 4 170 33.5 33.5 87.4 NS/NC 5 64 12.6 12.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 6 EVALUACION PDTE EZP (NAL) 22/JUN/95 TELEFONICA 6/22/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN EZP40695.FRE PCTR GOB EZP TIENE CONTROL DEL PAIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TIENE CONTROL 1 182 35.7 35.7 35.7 SALIENDO CONTROL 2 247 48.5 48.5 84.2 NS/NC 3 80 15.8 15.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2_1 ¿POR QUE ESTAN SALIENDO DE CONTROL? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent INSEGURIDAD 1 41 8.1 16.6 16.6 MAL MANEJO ECO 2 33 6.5 13.4 30.0 INCAPACIDAD GOBERNAR 3 31 6.1 12.5 42.5 CONFLICTO CHS 4 5 1.0 2.2 44.7 POR SITUACION PAIS 5 60 11.9 24.5 69.2 GOBIERNO ANTES 6 12 2.3 4.7 73.8 MAL MANEJO POLIT 7 23 4.5 9.3 83.2 ROMPIMINETO CSG 8 3 .7 1.4 84.6 NS/NC 9 38 7.5 15.4 100.0 0 262 51.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 247 Missing cases 262 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P3_1 COMO VE AL PDTE ZEDILLO... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FUERTE 1 217 42.7 42.7 42.7 DEBIL 2 235 46.3 46.3 89.0 NS/NC 3 56 11.0 11.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 EVALUACION PDTE EZP (NAL) 22/JUN/95 TELEFONICA 6/22/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN EZP40695.FRE P3_2 COMO VE AL PDTE ZEDILLO... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FALSO 1 151 29.7 29.7 29.7 SINCERO 2 296 58.2 58.2 88.0 NS/NC 3 61 12.0 12.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P3_3 COMO VE AL PDTE ZEDILLO... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DURO 1 60 11.9 11.9 11.9 AMABLE 2 385 75.8 75.8 87.7 NS/NC 3 63 12.3 12.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P3_4 COMO VE AL PDTE ZEDILLO... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTUA EL MISMO 1 184 36.1 36.1 36.1 LO MANEJAN 2 246 48.4 48.4 84.5 NS/NC 3 79 15.5 15.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 EVALUACION PDTE EZP (NAL) 22/JUN/95 TELEFONICA 6/22/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN EZP40695.FRE P3A_1 PERSONAS QUE EN SU OPINION LO MANEJAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CSG 1 35 6.8 14.1 14.1 EL GOBIERNO 2 26 5.2 10.7 24.8 EL PRI 3 25 4.8 10.0 34.8 ESTADOS UNIDOS 4 12 2.4 5.0 39.8 EL GABINETE 5 57 11.3 23.3 63.1 LOS EMPRESARIOS 6 2 .5 1.0 64.0 OTRO 7 17 3.3 6.9 70.9 NS/NC 8 72 14.1 29.1 100.0 0 262 51.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 246 Missing cases 262 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P3A_2 PORQUE CREE QUE LO MANEJAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO PREPARADO 1 75 14.8 30.6 30.6 SITUACION PAIS 2 66 13.0 26.8 57.4 INFLUENCIA E.U. 3 13 2.5 5.1 62.5 OTRO 4 40 7.8 16.2 78.7 NS/NC 5 52 10.3 21.3 100.0 0 262 51.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 246 Missing cases 262 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 EVALUACION PDTE EZP (NAL) 22/JUN/95 TELEFONICA 6/22/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN EZP40695.FRE P5_1 ¿CRE QUE EZP ES... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CLARO AL HABLAR 1 346 68.1 68.1 68.1 NO CLARO HABLAR 2 131 25.8 25.8 93.9 NS/NC 3 31 6.1 6.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5_2 ¿CRE QUE EZP ES...... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO CERCANO PUEBLO 1 174 34.3 34.3 34.3 CERCANO PUEBLO 2 292 57.5 57.5 91.7 NS/NC 3 42 8.3 8.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5_3 ¿CRE QUE EZP ES...... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent RESOLVERA POBREZA 1 147 29.0 29.1 29.1 NO RESOLV POBREZA 2 293 57.7 57.9 87.0 NS/NC 3 66 13.0 13.0 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 507 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 EVALUACION PDTE EZP (NAL) 22/JUN/95 TELEFONICA 6/22/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN EZP40695.FRE P5_4 ¿CRE QUE EZP ES...... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO ES HONRADO 1 102 20.1 20.1 20.1 ES HONRADO 2 269 52.9 52.9 73.0 NS/NC 3 137 27.0 27.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5_5 ¿CRE QUE EZP ES...... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA OPCION PAIS 1 291 57.3 57.6 57.6 NO BUENA OPCION 2 154 30.4 30.5 88.1 NS/NC 3 60 11.8 11.9 100.0 0 3 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 506 Missing cases 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5_6 ¿CRE QUE EZP ES...... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO PERSONALIDAD PDTE 1 176 34.7 34.7 34.7 PERSONALIDAD PDTE 2 300 59.0 59.1 93.7 NS/NC 3 32 6.3 6.3 100.0 0 0 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 EVALUACION PDTE EZP (NAL) 22/JUN/95 TELEFONICA 6/22/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN EZP40695.FRE P6 PRINCIPAL CUALIDAD DE EZP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MANERA DE SER 1 51 10.0 10.0 10.0 SU SINCERIDAD 2 46 9.0 9.0 18.9 NINGUNA 3 67 13.3 13.3 32.2 PREPARACION/EXPER 4 23 4.6 4.6 36.8 SU MANERA HABLAR 5 34 6.7 6.7 43.5 SU PERSONALIDAD 6 17 3.3 3.3 46.8 CERCANIA AL PUEBLO 7 10 2.0 2.0 48.8 SENCILLEZ 8 25 4.8 4.8 53.7 ES TRABAJADOR 9 7 1.4 1.4 55.1 INTERES PROBL PAIS 10 65 12.9 12.9 67.9 OTRO 11 47 9.2 9.2 77.2 NS/NC 12 116 22.8 22.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7 Y CUAL ES SU PRINCIPAL DEFECTO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LO MANEJAN 1 48 9.5 9.5 9.5 NINGUNO 2 63 12.4 12.4 21.9 DEBIL/BLANDO 3 52 10.2 10.2 32.1 INSEGURO/INDECISO 4 28 5.5 5.6 37.7 LE FALTA CARACTER 5 23 4.6 4.6 42.3 LE FALTA AUTORIDAD 6 14 2.7 2.7 45.0 ENGAÑA 7 18 3.5 3.5 48.6 NO CUMPLE 8 20 4.0 4.0 52.5 NO CLARO HABLAR 9 4 .8 .8 53.3 NO RESUELVE PROBLS 10 8 1.6 1.6 54.9 SUS COLABORADORES 11 11 2.1 2.1 56.9 FALTA EXPER POLIT 12 24 4.7 4.7 61.7 OTRO 13 44 8.7 8.7 70.3 NS/NC 14 151 29.6 29.7 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 EVALUACION PDTE EZP (NAL) 22/JUN/95 TELEFONICA 6/22/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN EZP40695.FRE P8 PRINCIAPLES TAREAS QUE HA REALIZADO EZP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACLARAR ASESINATOS 1 12 2.5 2.5 2.5 RESOLV CONFLICTO CHS 2 19 3.6 3.6 6.1 MANEJO CRISIS ECO 3 93 18.4 18.4 24.5 NINGUNA 4 91 17.8 17.8 42.3 MEJORAR PAIS 5 58 11.5 11.5 53.8 CONFIANZA PUEBLO 6 11 2.1 2.1 55.9 REFORMA JUDICIAL 7 3 .5 .5 56.4 ACERCAMIENTO OPOSICI 8 4 .8 .8 57.2 OTRO 9 71 14.0 14.0 71.2 NS/NC 10 146 28.7 28.8 100.0 0 0 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9_1 ACUERDO EZP CON: EDUCACION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 255 50.1 50.1 50.1 ACUERDO PARTE 2 54 10.5 10.5 60.6 DESACUERDO 3 153 30.1 30.1 90.7 NS/NC 4 47 9.3 9.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 EVALUACION PDTE EZP (NAL) 22/JUN/95 TELEFONICA 6/22/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN EZP40695.FRE P9_2 ACUERDO EZP CON: ASUNTOS POLITICOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 190 37.3 37.3 37.3 ACUERDO PARTE 2 52 10.2 10.2 47.6 DESACUERDO 3 188 36.9 36.9 84.5 NS/NC 4 79 15.5 15.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9_3 ACUERDO EZP CON: ECONOMIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 152 29.9 29.9 29.9 ACUERDO PARTE 2 47 9.2 9.2 39.1 DESACUERDO 3 277 54.4 54.4 93.5 NS/NC 4 33 6.5 6.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9_4 ACUERDO EZP CON: CONFLICTO CHS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 214 42.1 42.1 42.1 ACUERDO PARTE 2 34 6.7 6.7 48.8 DESACUERDO 3 182 35.8 35.8 84.6 NS/NC 4 78 15.4 15.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 EVALUACION PDTE EZP (NAL) 22/JUN/95 TELEFONICA 6/22/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN EZP40695.FRE P9_5 ACUERDO EZP CON: ASESINATOS POLITICOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 173 34.0 34.0 34.0 ACUERDO PARTE 2 40 7.8 7.8 41.8 DESACUERDO 3 247 48.7 48.7 90.5 NS/NC 4 49 9.5 9.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9_6 ACUERDO EZP CON: POLITICA EXTERIOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 186 36.5 36.5 36.5 ACUERDO PARTE 2 58 11.4 11.4 47.9 DESACUERDO 3 145 28.6 28.6 76.6 NS/NC 4 119 23.4 23.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9_7 ACUERDO EZP CON: COMBATE CORRUPCION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 219 43.1 43.1 43.1 ACUERDO PARTE 2 47 9.3 9.3 52.4 DESACUERDO 3 198 38.9 38.9 91.3 NS/NC 4 44 8.7 8.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 EVALUACION PDTE EZP (NAL) 22/JUN/95 TELEFONICA 6/22/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN EZP40695.FRE PCAL CALIFICACION EZP COMO PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 15 3.0 3.0 3.0 1 5 .9 .9 3.9 2 4 .7 .7 4.6 3 10 1.9 1.9 6.5 4 18 3.5 3.5 10.0 5 49 9.6 9.6 19.6 6 58 11.5 11.5 31.1 7 92 18.0 18.0 49.1 8 143 28.1 28.1 77.2 9 49 9.7 9.7 86.8 10 45 8.9 8.9 95.8 NS/NC 11 21 4.2 4.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P14 PROBLEMA MAS GRAVE DEL PAIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent INFLACION 1 13 2.5 2.5 2.5 DESEMPLEO 2 66 12.9 13.0 15.5 AGUA 3 1 .1 .1 15.6 SEGURIDAD PUBLICA 4 32 6.2 6.3 21.9 CONFLICTO CHS 6 9 1.7 1.7 23.6 DEVALUACION PESO 7 23 4.6 4.6 28.2 CRISIS ECONOMICA 8 286 56.3 56.6 84.8 EDUCACION 10 1 .1 .1 84.9 PROBLEMAS ELEC 11 1 .3 .3 85.2 OTRO 12 65 12.7 12.8 98.0 NS/NC 13 10 2.0 2.0 100.0 0 2 .4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 506 Missing cases 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 EVALUACION PDTE EZP (NAL) 22/JUN/95 TELEFONICA 6/22/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN EZP40695.FRE P16 PRINCIPAL PROBLEMA QUE DEBE RESOLVER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DESEMPLEO 1 113 22.3 22.3 22.3 SEGURIDAD PUBLICA 2 18 3.5 3.5 25.8 CONFLICTO CHS 3 19 3.7 3.7 29.4 CRIMENES POLITICOS 4 28 5.4 5.4 34.9 CRISIS ECONOMICA 5 269 53.0 53.0 87.9 PROBLEMAS ELEC 6 1 .2 .2 88.1 BAJOS SALARIOS 7 6 1.1 1.1 89.2 OTRA 8 44 8.7 8.7 97.9 NS/NC 9 11 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PSIM SIMPATIZA CANDIDATOS ELEC 94 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DFC DEL PAN 1 166 32.6 32.6 32.6 EZP DEL PRI 2 213 41.9 41.9 74.5 CCS DEL PRD 3 48 9.5 9.5 84.0 OTRO 4 7 1.5 1.5 85.5 NINGUNO 5 67 13.2 13.2 98.7 NS/NC 6 7 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 244 48.0 48.0 48.0 femenino 2 264 52.0 52.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 EVALUACION PDTE EZP (NAL) 22/JUN/95 TELEFONICA 6/22/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN EZP40695.FRE EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 149 29.2 29.2 29.2 26-40 2 193 37.9 37.9 67.1 41-60 3 122 23.9 23.9 91.0 61 + 4 46 9.0 9.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INST Institución donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 255 50.1 50.1 50.1 gob fed 2 34 6.6 6.6 56.7 paraestatal 3 14 2.7 2.7 59.5 emp priv 4 92 18.1 18.1 77.5 negocio prop 5 45 8.8 8.8 86.3 independiente 6 69 13.7 13.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 141 27.8 55.5 55.5 estudiante 2 70 13.8 27.5 83.0 jubilado 3 22 4.3 8.6 91.7 desemp 4 18 3.5 7.0 98.7 otro 5 3 .7 1.3 100.0 0 254 49.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 255 Missing cases 254 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 EVALUACION PDTE EZP (NAL) 22/JUN/95 TELEFONICA 6/22/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN EZP40695.FRE ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 5 1.0 1.0 1.0 prim inc 2 27 5.3 5.3 6.3 prim comp 3 73 14.4 14.4 20.7 sec incom 4 7 1.3 1.3 22.1 sec comp 5 96 18.9 18.9 41.0 prep incom 6 34 6.7 6.7 47.7 prep comp 7 98 19.2 19.2 67.0 univ incom 8 74 14.5 14.5 81.5 univ comp + 9 94 18.5 18.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 31 6.1 7.2 7.2 1-3 sm 2 131 25.8 30.6 37.8 3-5 sm 3 145 28.6 33.8 71.5 5-7 sm 4 65 12.7 15.0 86.6 7-10 5 30 5.9 7.0 93.5 10 + SM 6 28 5.5 6.5 100.0 0 79 15.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 430 Missing cases 79 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 EVALUACION PDTE EZP (NAL) 22/JUN/95 TELEFONICA 6/22/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN EZP40695.FRE This procedure was completed at 20:21:22 The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 510 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 5587 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 698 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PCAL CALIFICACION EZP COMO PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 37 7.2 7.2 7.2 1 5 .9 .9 8.1 2 4 .7 .7 8.8 3 10 1.9 1.9 10.7 4 18 3.5 3.5 14.2 5 49 9.6 9.6 23.9 6 58 11.5 11.5 35.3 7 92 18.0 18.0 53.3 8 143 28.1 28.1 81.4 9 49 9.7 9.7 91.1 10 45 8.9 8.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 EVALUACION PDTE EZP (NAL) 22/JUN/95 TELEFONICA 6/22/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN EZP40695.FRE PCAL CALIFICACION EZP COMO PDTE Mean 6.659 Std err .113 Median 7.000 Mode 8.000 Std dev 2.554 Variance 6.523 Kurtosis 1.158 S E Kurt .216 Skewness -1.235 S E Skew .108 Range 10.000 Minimum .000 Maximum 10.000 Sum 3385.241 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 EVALUACION PDTE EZP (NAL) 22/JUN/95 TELEFONICA 6/22/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN EZP40695.FRE This procedure was completed at 20:21:23 Memory allows for 3,532 cells with 2 dimensions for general CROSSTABS. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 EVALUACION PDTE EZP (NAL) 22/JUN/95 TELEFONICA 6/22/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN EZP40695.FRE PSIM SIMPATIZA CANDIDATOS ELEC 94 by VER VER Page 1 of 1 Count | Row Pct | Col Pct | Row | 1| 2| Total PSIM ....................... 1 | 89| 77| 166 DFC DEL PAN | 53.5| 46.5| 32.6 | 33.0| 32.2| ............... 2 | 110| 103| 213 EZP DEL PRI | 51.8| 48.2| 41.9 | 41.0| 42.9| ............... 3 | 23| 25| 48 CCS DEL PRD | 48.3| 51.7| 9.5 | 8.7| 10.4| ............... 4 | 2| 6| 7 OTRO | 24.0| 76.0| 1.5 | .7| 2.4| ............... 5 | 40| 27| 67 NINGUNO | 60.4| 39.6| 13.2 | 15.0| 11.1| ............... 6 | 4| 2| 7 NS/NC | 64.4| 35.6| 1.3 | 1.6| 1.0| ............... Column 269 239 508 Total 52.9 47.1 100.0 Number of Missing Observations: 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 EVALUACION PDTE EZP (NAL) 22/JUN/95 TELEFONICA 6/22/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN EZP40695.FRE This procedure was completed at 20:21:24 The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 510 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 5587 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 698 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PCAL CALIFICACION EZP COMO PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 37 7.2 7.2 7.2 1 5 .9 .9 8.1 2 4 .7 .7 8.8 3 10 1.9 1.9 10.7 4 18 3.5 3.5 14.2 5 49 9.6 9.6 23.9 6 58 11.5 11.5 35.3 7 92 18.0 18.0 53.3 8 143 28.1 28.1 81.4 9 49 9.7 9.7 91.1 10 45 8.9 8.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 508 100.0 100.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 EVALUACION PDTE EZP (NAL) 22/JUN/95 TELEFONICA 6/22/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN EZP40695.FRE PCAL CALIFICACION EZP COMO PDTE Mean 6.659 Std err .113 Median 7.000 Mode 8.000 Std dev 2.554 Variance 6.523 Kurtosis 1.158 S E Kurt .216 Skewness -1.235 S E Skew .108 Range 10.000 Minimum .000 Maximum 10.000 Sum 3385.241 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 EVALUACION PDTE EZP (NAL) 22/JUN/95 TELEFONICA 6/22/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN EZP40695.FRE This procedure was completed at 20:21:26 End of Include file.