The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 323 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 9549 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 1193 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1 SITUACION DEL PAIS MEJOR? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 87 26.7 26.8 26.8 Igual (voluntario) 2 55 17.1 17.1 43.9 Peor 3 177 54.4 54.5 98.4 No sabe 4 3 1.0 1.0 99.4 No contestó 5 2 .6 .6 100.0 . 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 324 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 SATISFECHO CON EL NIVEL DE VIDA ACTUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 135 41.6 41.7 41.7 Si en parte 2 32 9.9 10.0 51.7 No 3 156 47.9 48.1 99.8 No contestó 4 1 .2 .2 100.0 . 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 324 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 6 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE P3 CANDIDATO INSPIRA MAS CONFIANZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas 1 26 8.1 8.1 8.1 Ernesto Zedillo 2 137 42.1 42.1 50.2 Diego Fdez. de Ceval 3 86 26.5 26.5 76.7 Ninguno 4 18 5.5 5.5 82.2 No sabe 5 35 10.8 10.8 93.1 No contestó 6 22 6.9 6.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4 PRECIOS DE COMPRA HABITALES MAS ALTOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Son más altos 1 214 65.9 65.9 65.9 No han cambiado 2 70 21.5 21.5 87.4 Son más bajos 3 28 8.5 8.5 95.9 No sabe 4 13 4.1 4.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 SIT ECONOMICA PERSONAL MEJOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 141 43.3 43.3 43.3 Igual (voluntario) 2 26 8.0 8.0 51.3 Peor 3 65 19.9 19.9 71.1 No sabe 4 79 24.4 24.4 95.6 No contestó 5 14 4.4 4.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE P6 QUIEN GUSTARIA FUERA PROXIMO PTE REP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas 1 30 9.3 9.3 9.3 Ernesto Zedillo 2 130 40.0 40.2 49.5 Diego Fdez. de Ceval 3 87 26.7 26.8 76.3 Otro 4 8 2.6 2.6 78.9 No sabe 5 36 11.1 11.2 90.1 No contestó 6 32 9.8 9.9 100.0 . 1 .4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 323 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7 COMO CONSID SIT ECONOM ACTUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 106 32.7 32.9 32.9 Igual (voluntario) 2 74 22.7 22.8 55.7 Peor 3 131 40.2 40.5 96.2 No sabe 4 5 1.7 1.7 97.9 No contestó 5 7 2.1 2.1 100.0 . 2 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 322 Missing cases 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE P8 ACUERDO FORMA DE GOBERNAR PRESIDENTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent De acuerdo 1 208 64.1 64.4 64.4 De acuerdo en parte 2 33 10.2 10.2 74.6 En desacuerdo 3 65 19.9 20.0 94.6 No sabe 4 10 3.0 3.0 97.6 No contestó 5 8 2.4 2.4 100.0 . 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 324 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR1 Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 23 7.1 7.1 7.1 Zedillo 2 106 32.5 32.5 39.6 Cevallos 3 108 33.4 33.4 73.0 Ninguno 4 9 2.7 2.7 75.7 NS-NC 5 79 24.3 24.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2 mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 44 13.6 13.6 13.6 Zedillo 2 121 37.4 37.4 51.0 Cevallos 3 88 27.0 27.0 78.0 Ninguno 4 18 5.4 5.4 83.4 NS-NC 5 54 16.6 16.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PATR3 Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 20 6.1 6.1 6.1 Zedillo 2 99 30.3 30.3 36.4 Cevallos 3 167 51.4 51.4 87.8 Ninguno 4 4 1.3 1.3 89.1 NS-NC 5 35 10.9 10.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR4 Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 61 18.6 18.6 18.6 Zedillo 2 131 40.3 40.3 58.9 Cevallos 3 85 26.2 26.2 85.1 Ninguno 4 3 1.1 1.1 86.2 NS-NC 5 45 13.8 13.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR5 Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 30 9.1 9.1 9.1 Zedillo 2 137 42.3 42.3 51.4 Cevallos 3 89 27.5 27.5 79.0 Ninguno 4 11 3.4 3.4 82.4 NS-NC 5 57 17.6 17.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PATR6 Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 25 7.7 7.7 7.7 Zedillo 2 92 28.3 28.3 36.0 Cevallos 3 76 23.5 23.5 59.4 Ninguno 4 19 5.8 5.8 65.3 NS-NC 5 113 34.7 34.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR7 MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 17 5.3 5.3 5.3 Zedillo 2 132 40.6 40.6 45.9 Cevallos 3 124 38.2 38.2 84.2 Ninguno 4 6 1.9 1.9 86.0 NS-NC 5 45 14.0 14.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8 PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 28 8.7 8.7 8.7 Zedillo 2 108 33.3 33.3 42.0 Cevallos 3 63 19.4 19.4 61.4 Ninguno 4 42 12.8 12.8 74.2 NS-NC 5 84 25.8 25.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PATR9 Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 31 9.5 9.5 9.5 Zedillo 2 96 29.7 29.7 39.2 Cevallos 3 97 29.7 29.7 68.9 Ninguno 4 25 7.6 7.6 76.5 NS-NC 5 76 23.5 23.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR1_A Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 12 3.8 6.7 6.7 Zedillo 2 62 19.2 34.3 41.1 Cevallos 3 59 18.2 32.5 73.6 Ninguno 4 5 1.5 2.6 76.2 NS-NC 5 43 13.3 23.8 100.0 . 143 44.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 182 Missing cases 143 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2_A mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 18 5.5 9.8 9.8 Zedillo 2 68 20.8 37.1 46.9 Cevallos 3 53 16.2 29.0 75.9 Ninguno 4 11 3.3 5.9 81.8 NS-NC 5 33 10.2 18.2 100.0 . 143 44.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 182 Missing cases 143 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PATR3_A Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 8 2.4 4.3 4.3 Zedillo 2 55 17.0 30.3 34.6 Cevallos 3 96 29.5 52.8 87.4 Ninguno 4 3 1.0 1.8 89.2 NS-NC 5 20 6.1 10.8 100.0 . 143 44.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 182 Missing cases 143 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR4_A Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 30 9.3 16.6 16.6 Zedillo 2 75 23.0 41.0 57.6 Cevallos 3 50 15.3 27.3 84.9 Ninguno 4 1 .3 .6 85.4 NS-NC 5 26 8.2 14.6 100.0 . 143 44.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 182 Missing cases 143 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PATR5_A Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 17 5.1 9.2 9.2 Zedillo 2 76 23.5 41.9 51.1 Cevallos 3 47 14.5 25.9 77.0 Ninguno 4 7 2.3 4.1 81.1 NS-NC 5 34 10.6 18.9 100.0 . 143 44.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 182 Missing cases 143 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6_A Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 12 3.6 6.4 6.4 Zedillo 2 51 15.7 28.0 34.5 Cevallos 3 44 13.6 24.2 58.7 Ninguno 4 13 3.9 7.0 65.7 NS-NC 5 62 19.2 34.3 100.0 . 143 44.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 182 Missing cases 143 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PATR7_A MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 7 2.2 3.9 3.9 Zedillo 2 74 22.9 40.9 44.9 Cevallos 3 70 21.6 38.5 83.4 Ninguno 4 2 .6 1.0 84.4 NS-NC 5 28 8.7 15.6 100.0 . 143 44.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 182 Missing cases 143 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8_A PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 14 4.4 7.9 7.9 Zedillo 2 65 20.0 35.8 43.7 Cevallos 3 37 11.5 20.4 64.1 Ninguno 4 20 6.2 11.0 75.2 NS-NC 5 45 13.9 24.8 100.0 . 143 44.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 182 Missing cases 143 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PATR9_A Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 15 4.6 8.2 8.2 Zedillo 2 57 17.4 31.1 39.3 Cevallos 3 53 16.4 29.3 68.6 Ninguno 4 13 4.0 7.1 75.7 NS-NC 5 44 13.6 24.3 100.0 . 143 44.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 182 Missing cases 143 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR1_B Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 11 3.3 7.5 7.5 Zedillo 2 43 13.3 30.2 37.7 Cevallos 3 49 15.2 34.4 72.1 Ninguno 4 4 1.3 2.8 75.0 NS-NC 5 36 11.0 25.0 100.0 . 182 56.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 143 Missing cases 182 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PATR2_B mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 26 8.1 18.5 18.5 Zedillo 2 54 16.6 37.7 56.1 Cevallos 3 35 10.8 24.4 80.6 Ninguno 4 7 2.1 4.8 85.3 NS-NC 5 21 6.4 14.7 100.0 . 182 56.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 143 Missing cases 182 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR3_B Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 12 3.7 8.4 8.4 Zedillo 2 43 13.3 30.3 38.7 Cevallos 3 71 21.8 49.6 88.3 Ninguno 4 1 .3 .6 88.9 NS-NC 5 16 4.9 11.1 100.0 . 182 56.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 143 Missing cases 182 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PATR4_B Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 30 9.3 21.2 21.2 Zedillo 2 56 17.3 39.4 60.7 Cevallos 3 35 10.9 24.8 85.4 Ninguno 4 2 .7 1.7 87.1 NS-NC 5 18 5.7 12.9 100.0 . 182 56.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 143 Missing cases 182 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR5_B Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 13 4.0 9.0 9.0 Zedillo 2 61 18.8 42.8 51.9 Cevallos 3 42 13.0 29.5 81.4 Ninguno 4 4 1.1 2.6 84.0 NS-NC 5 23 7.0 16.0 100.0 . 182 56.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 143 Missing cases 182 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PATR6_B Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 13 4.1 9.3 9.3 Zedillo 2 41 12.6 28.7 37.9 Cevallos 3 32 9.9 22.5 60.4 Ninguno 4 6 1.9 4.3 64.8 NS-NC 5 50 15.5 35.2 100.0 . 182 56.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 143 Missing cases 182 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR7_B MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 10 3.1 7.0 7.0 Zedillo 2 57 17.7 40.2 47.3 Cevallos 3 54 16.7 37.9 85.2 Ninguno 4 4 1.3 2.9 88.1 NS-NC 5 17 5.2 11.9 100.0 . 182 56.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 143 Missing cases 182 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PATR8_B PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 14 4.2 9.7 9.7 Zedillo 2 43 13.3 30.2 39.8 Cevallos 3 26 7.9 18.0 57.8 Ninguno 4 22 6.6 15.1 72.9 NS-NC 5 39 11.9 27.1 100.0 . 182 56.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 143 Missing cases 182 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR9_B Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 16 4.9 11.1 11.1 Zedillo 2 40 12.3 27.9 39.0 Cevallos 3 43 13.3 30.3 69.2 Ninguno 4 12 3.6 8.3 77.5 NS-NC 5 32 9.9 22.5 100.0 . 182 56.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 143 Missing cases 182 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PVOT1_A VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 25 7.8 30.7 30.7 UNO 1 32 10.0 38.9 69.6 DOS 2 9 2.9 11.2 80.8 TRES 3 12 3.6 14.0 94.8 CINCO 5 4 1.3 5.2 100.0 . 242 74.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 83 Missing cases 242 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT2_A VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 8 2.5 6.7 6.7 UNO 1 20 6.0 16.0 22.8 DOS 2 26 7.9 21.0 43.7 TRES 3 24 7.4 19.6 63.4 CUATRO 4 3 .9 2.3 65.7 CINCO 5 42 12.9 34.3 100.0 . 203 62.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 122 Missing cases 203 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PVOT3_A VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 11 3.4 9.9 9.9 UNO 1 27 8.4 24.6 34.4 DOS 2 28 8.6 25.3 59.7 TRES 3 22 6.7 19.7 79.4 CUATRO 4 2 .6 1.8 81.1 CINCO 5 21 6.4 18.9 100.0 . 214 66.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 111 Missing cases 214 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4_A VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 21 6.4 100.0 100.0 . 304 93.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 21 Missing cases 304 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT5_A VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 22 6.7 100.0 100.0 . 303 93.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 22 Missing cases 303 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PVOT6_A VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 20 6.0 59.7 59.7 UNO 1 8 2.4 24.1 83.8 DOS 2 3 .9 9.1 92.9 CINCO 5 2 .7 7.1 100.0 . 292 89.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 33 Missing cases 292 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7_A VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 22 6.7 85.2 85.2 UNO 1 4 1.2 14.8 100.0 . 299 92.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 25 Missing cases 299 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT8_A VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 21 6.4 100.0 100.0 . 304 93.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 21 Missing cases 304 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PVOT9_A VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 22 6.7 100.0 100.0 . 303 93.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 22 Missing cases 303 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10_A VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 21 6.4 91.9 91.9 UNO 1 1 .3 3.9 95.8 CINCO 5 1 .3 4.2 100.0 . 302 93.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 23 Missing cases 302 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT11_A VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 22 6.7 89.4 89.4 CINCO 5 3 .8 10.6 100.0 . 301 92.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 24 Missing cases 301 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PVOT12_A VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 21 6.5 53.7 53.7 CINCO 5 18 5.6 46.3 100.0 . 286 87.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 39 Missing cases 286 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13_A VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 19 5.8 66.5 66.5 UNO 1 2 .5 5.5 72.0 TRES 3 1 .3 3.1 75.1 CINCO 5 7 2.2 24.9 100.0 . 297 91.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 28 Missing cases 297 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT1_B VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 3 .9 5.8 5.8 UNO 1 20 6.0 40.7 46.5 DOS 2 10 3.1 20.6 67.1 TRES 3 6 2.0 13.3 80.5 CUATRO 4 3 .9 6.0 86.5 CINCO 5 6 2.0 13.5 100.0 . 277 85.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 48 Missing cases 277 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PVOT2_B VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 3 .9 3.6 3.6 UNO 1 21 6.4 26.1 29.7 DOS 2 17 5.1 20.8 50.5 TRES 3 19 5.8 23.4 74.0 CINCO 5 21 6.4 26.0 100.0 . 245 75.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 80 Missing cases 245 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT3_B VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 17 5.2 22.0 22.0 DOS 2 26 8.1 34.5 56.5 TRES 3 13 4.0 16.8 73.3 CUATRO 4 5 1.4 6.0 79.4 CINCO 5 16 4.9 20.6 100.0 . 248 76.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 77 Missing cases 248 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4_B VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 .6 100.0 100.0 . 323 99.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 323 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PVOT5_B VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 .4 39.6 39.6 UNO 1 2 .6 60.4 100.0 . 322 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 322 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT6_B VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 10 3.2 64.1 64.1 DOS 2 5 1.6 31.8 95.8 CINCO 5 1 .2 4.2 100.0 . 309 95.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 16 Missing cases 309 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7_B VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 5 1.7 84.9 84.9 CINCO 5 1 .3 15.1 100.0 . 318 98.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6 Missing cases 318 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PVOT8_B VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 325 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 325 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT9_B VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 .3 35.3 35.3 UNO 1 1 .3 32.4 67.6 TRES 3 1 .3 32.4 100.0 . 322 99.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 322 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10_B VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .4 100.0 100.0 . 324 99.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 324 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PVOT11_B VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 2 .5 13.4 13.4 UNO 1 5 1.7 46.5 59.9 CINCO 5 5 1.4 40.1 100.0 . 313 96.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 12 Missing cases 313 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT12_B VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 2 .5 12.6 12.6 DOS 2 1 .3 7.7 20.3 CINCO 5 11 3.4 79.7 100.0 . 311 95.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 14 Missing cases 311 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13_B VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 13 3.9 100.0 100.0 . 312 96.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 13 Missing cases 312 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PVOT1 VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 222 68.3 68.3 68.3 UNO 1 52 16.0 16.0 84.3 DOS 2 19 5.9 5.9 90.2 TRES 3 18 5.6 5.6 95.8 CUATRO 4 3 .9 .9 96.7 CINCO 5 11 3.3 3.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT2 VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 134 41.2 41.2 41.2 UNO 1 40 12.4 12.4 53.7 DOS 2 42 13.0 13.0 66.7 TRES 3 43 13.1 13.1 79.8 CUATRO 4 3 .9 .9 80.7 CINCO 5 63 19.3 19.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PVOT3 VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 149 45.7 45.7 45.7 UNO 1 44 13.6 13.6 59.3 DOS 2 54 16.7 16.7 76.0 TRES 3 35 10.7 10.7 86.7 CUATRO 4 7 2.0 2.0 88.7 CINCO 5 37 11.3 11.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4 VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 323 99.4 99.4 99.4 UNO 1 2 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT5 VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 323 99.4 99.4 99.4 UNO 1 2 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PVOT6 VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 295 90.9 90.9 90.9 UNO 1 18 5.6 5.6 96.6 DOS 2 8 2.5 2.5 99.1 CINCO 5 3 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7 VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 315 96.9 96.9 96.9 UNO 1 9 2.8 2.8 99.7 CINCO 5 1 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT8 VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 325 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 32 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PVOT9 VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 323 99.5 99.5 99.5 UNO 1 1 .3 .3 99.7 TRES 3 1 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10 VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 322 99.0 99.0 99.0 UNO 1 2 .7 .7 99.7 CINCO 5 1 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT11 VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 312 96.1 96.1 96.1 UNO 1 5 1.7 1.7 97.8 CINCO 5 7 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 33 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PVOT12 VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 295 90.7 90.7 90.7 DOS 2 1 .3 .3 91.0 CINCO 5 29 9.0 9.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13 VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 303 93.2 93.2 93.2 UNO 1 2 .5 .5 93.7 TRES 3 1 .3 .3 94.0 CINCO 5 20 6.0 6.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 119 36.5 36.5 36.5 CCS del PRD 2 33 10.1 10.1 46.6 DFC del PAN 3 86 26.5 26.5 73.0 Otro 4 5 1.6 1.6 74.7 Por ninguno 5 5 1.5 1.5 76.1 No sabe 6 36 11.2 11.2 87.4 No contestó 7 41 12.6 12.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 34 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PELE_A SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA A Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 62 19.1 34.1 34.1 CCS del PRD 2 20 6.1 10.9 45.0 DFC del PAN 3 45 13.9 24.8 69.8 Otro 4 4 1.1 2.0 71.8 Por ninguno 5 1 .4 .8 72.6 No sabe 6 22 6.9 12.4 85.0 No contestó 7 27 8.4 15.0 100.0 . 143 44.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 182 Missing cases 143 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE_B SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA B Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 57 17.4 39.5 39.5 CCS del PRD 2 13 4.0 9.0 48.6 DFC del PAN 3 41 12.6 28.5 77.1 Otro 4 2 .5 1.1 78.3 Por ninguno 5 3 1.0 2.4 80.6 No sabe 6 14 4.3 9.8 90.4 No contestó 7 14 4.2 9.6 100.0 . 182 56.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 143 Missing cases 182 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 35 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 157 48.3 48.3 48.3 femenino 2 168 51.7 51.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 96 29.6 29.6 29.6 26-40 2 118 36.4 36.4 66.0 41-60 3 76 23.5 23.5 89.5 61 + 4 34 10.5 10.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INST Institución donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 152 46.9 46.9 46.9 gob fed 2 28 8.5 8.5 55.4 paraestatal 3 2 .5 .5 55.9 emp priv 4 81 24.9 24.9 80.8 negocio prop 5 22 6.7 6.7 87.5 independiente 6 40 12.2 12.2 99.7 7 1 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 36 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 93 28.7 61.2 61.2 estudiante 2 39 11.9 25.4 86.5 jubilado 3 9 2.8 6.1 92.6 desemp 4 7 2.0 4.3 96.9 otro 5 5 1.4 3.1 100.0 0 172 53.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 152 Missing cases 172 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACTIV Rama de actividad económica Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent agric 1 3 1.0 2.0 2.0 industria 2 11 3.5 6.5 8.5 comercio 3 47 14.6 27.5 36.0 construc 4 4 1.2 2.3 38.3 educación 5 15 4.5 8.6 46.8 otros servs 6 91 27.9 52.6 99.4 7 1 .3 .6 100.0 0 152 46.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 172 Missing cases 152 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 37 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE PUESTO Que puesto ocupa en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario, Patron o 1 7 2.2 4.2 4.2 Directivo o Func de 2 17 5.2 9.8 14.0 Contratista o trabaj 3 40 12.3 23.2 37.2 Profesionista Indepe 4 13 4.1 7.8 44.9 Emplea, trabaj, Obre 5 92 28.4 53.6 98.5 trabajador sin pago 6 2 .5 .9 99.4 Otro 7 1 .3 .6 100.0 0 152 46.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 172 Missing cases 152 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1 .3 .3 .3 ninguno 1 13 4.0 4.0 4.3 prim inc 2 20 6.1 6.1 10.3 prim comp 3 47 14.4 14.4 24.7 sec incom 4 12 3.6 3.6 28.3 sec comp 5 77 23.8 23.8 52.1 prep incom 6 22 6.9 6.9 59.0 prep comp 7 38 11.7 11.7 70.7 univ incom 8 40 12.3 12.3 83.1 univ comp + 9 55 16.9 16.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 38 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 16 5.0 5.0 5.0 1-3 sm 2 84 26.0 26.0 31.0 3-5 sm 3 43 13.3 13.3 44.3 5-7 sm 4 19 6.0 6.0 50.3 7-10 5 37 11.3 11.3 61.6 10 + SM 6 57 17.5 17.5 79.0 7 68 21.0 21.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 325 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 39 ROLLOVER (80) NACIONAL 18/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/18/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLF0894.FRE This procedure was completed at 21:29:42 End of Include file.