The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 92 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 9842 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 1230 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1 SITUACION DEL PAIS MEJOR? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 31 33.2 33.2 33.2 Igual (voluntario) 2 11 11.9 11.9 45.1 Peor 3 50 54.1 54.1 99.1 No sabe 4 1 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 SATISFECHO CON EL NIVEL DE VIDA ACTUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 36 38.9 38.9 38.9 Si en parte 2 5 5.6 5.6 44.5 No 3 50 54.6 54.6 99.0 No contestó 4 1 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 6 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE P3 CANDIDATO INSPIRA MAS CONFIANZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas 1 15 16.4 16.4 16.4 Ernesto Zedillo 2 31 33.9 33.9 50.4 Diego Fdez. de Ceval 3 26 28.8 28.8 79.2 Ninguno 4 12 13.4 13.4 92.5 No sabe 5 7 7.5 7.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4 PRECIOS DE COMPRA HABITALES MAS ALTOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Son más altos 1 63 69.0 69.0 69.0 No han cambiado 2 20 21.6 21.6 90.6 Son más bajos 3 7 7.9 7.9 98.5 No sabe 4 1 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 SIT ECONOMICA PERSONAL MEJOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 44 48.2 48.2 48.2 Igual (voluntario) 2 4 4.4 4.4 52.7 Peor 3 20 21.6 21.6 74.2 No sabe 4 22 23.8 23.8 98.0 No contestó 5 2 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE P6 QUIEN GUSTARIA FUERA PROXIMO PTE REP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas 1 17 18.0 18.0 18.0 Ernesto Zedillo 2 30 32.5 32.5 50.4 Diego Fdez. de Ceval 3 26 28.7 28.7 79.2 Otro 4 2 1.8 1.8 80.9 No sabe 5 11 12.0 12.0 92.9 No contestó 6 6 7.1 7.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7 COMO CONSID SIT ECONOM ACTUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 30 33.0 33.0 33.0 Igual (voluntario) 2 26 28.6 28.6 61.6 Peor 3 34 37.4 37.4 99.0 No sabe 4 1 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8 ACUERDO FORMA DE GOBERNAR PRESIDENTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent De acuerdo 1 53 58.1 58.1 58.1 De acuerdo en parte 2 12 12.8 12.8 70.9 En desacuerdo 3 26 28.3 28.3 99.2 No contestó 5 1 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PATR1 Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 12 13.6 13.6 13.6 Zedillo 2 25 26.6 26.6 40.2 Cevallos 3 32 34.7 34.7 74.9 Ninguno 4 3 3.7 3.7 78.6 NS-NC 5 20 21.4 21.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2 mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 17 19.0 19.0 19.0 Zedillo 2 35 38.1 38.1 57.1 Cevallos 3 21 22.4 22.4 79.5 Ninguno 4 6 6.4 6.4 85.9 NS-NC 5 13 14.1 14.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR3 Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 12 12.9 12.9 12.9 Zedillo 2 25 27.0 27.0 39.8 Cevallos 3 41 44.6 44.6 84.5 Ninguno 4 5 4.9 4.9 89.4 NS-NC 5 10 10.6 10.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PATR4 Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 25 26.9 26.9 26.9 Zedillo 2 29 32.0 32.0 58.9 Cevallos 3 21 23.4 23.4 82.3 Ninguno 4 4 4.4 4.4 86.6 NS-NC 5 12 13.4 13.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR5 Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 18 19.1 19.1 19.1 Zedillo 2 28 30.3 30.3 49.4 Cevallos 3 26 28.3 28.3 77.7 Ninguno 4 7 7.3 7.3 85.1 NS-NC 5 14 14.9 14.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6 Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 11 12.3 12.3 12.3 Zedillo 2 18 19.7 19.7 32.0 Cevallos 3 16 17.2 17.2 49.2 Ninguno 4 12 13.6 13.6 62.8 NS-NC 5 34 37.2 37.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PATR7 MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 14 14.8 14.8 14.8 Zedillo 2 36 38.7 38.7 53.5 Cevallos 3 28 30.5 30.5 84.0 Ninguno 4 5 5.3 5.3 89.3 NS-NC 5 10 10.7 10.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8 PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 12 13.1 13.1 13.1 Zedillo 2 25 26.7 26.7 39.8 Cevallos 3 20 21.9 21.9 61.7 Ninguno 4 20 21.3 21.3 83.0 NS-NC 5 16 17.0 17.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR9 Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 15 16.7 16.7 16.7 Zedillo 2 20 21.4 21.4 38.2 Cevallos 3 34 36.8 36.8 75.0 Ninguno 4 10 10.3 10.3 85.3 NS-NC 5 14 14.7 14.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PATR1_A Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 5 5.5 10.2 10.2 Zedillo 2 14 15.0 27.8 38.0 Cevallos 3 16 17.8 32.9 70.9 Ninguno 4 2 2.3 4.2 75.1 NS-NC 5 12 13.4 24.9 100.0 . 42 46.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 50 Missing cases 42 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2_A mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 8 9.1 16.8 16.8 Zedillo 2 17 18.5 34.3 51.1 Cevallos 3 13 14.2 26.3 77.4 Ninguno 4 4 3.9 7.3 84.6 NS-NC 5 8 8.3 15.4 100.0 . 42 46.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 50 Missing cases 42 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PATR3_A Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 6 6.3 11.7 11.7 Zedillo 2 12 12.9 24.0 35.6 Cevallos 3 23 25.5 47.2 82.9 Ninguno 4 2 2.6 4.8 87.6 NS-NC 5 6 6.7 12.4 100.0 . 42 46.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 50 Missing cases 42 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR4_A Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 14 15.1 28.0 28.0 Zedillo 2 14 15.5 28.7 56.7 Cevallos 3 13 13.9 25.7 82.4 Ninguno 4 1 1.6 3.0 85.4 NS-NC 5 7 7.9 14.6 100.0 . 42 46.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 50 Missing cases 42 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PATR5_A Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 7 7.2 13.4 13.4 Zedillo 2 16 17.9 33.2 46.6 Cevallos 3 16 17.4 32.2 78.8 Ninguno 4 3 3.8 7.0 85.8 NS-NC 5 7 7.7 14.2 100.0 . 42 46.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 50 Missing cases 42 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6_A Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 4 4.1 7.6 7.6 Zedillo 2 10 10.8 19.9 27.5 Cevallos 3 10 10.7 19.9 47.4 Ninguno 4 8 8.7 16.2 63.6 NS-NC 5 18 19.6 36.4 100.0 . 42 46.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 50 Missing cases 42 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PATR7_A MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 6 6.4 11.8 11.8 Zedillo 2 21 22.3 41.4 53.2 Cevallos 3 15 15.9 29.4 82.6 Ninguno 4 4 4.5 8.4 91.1 NS-NC 5 4 4.8 8.9 100.0 . 42 46.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 50 Missing cases 42 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8_A PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 6 6.4 11.8 11.8 Zedillo 2 12 12.9 23.9 35.7 Cevallos 3 10 11.0 20.4 56.0 Ninguno 4 12 12.8 23.8 79.8 NS-NC 5 10 10.9 20.2 100.0 . 42 46.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 50 Missing cases 42 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PATR9_A Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 7 7.9 14.7 14.7 Zedillo 2 10 10.5 19.5 34.1 Cevallos 3 18 19.2 35.7 69.8 Ninguno 4 6 6.4 11.8 81.6 NS-NC 5 9 9.9 18.4 100.0 . 42 46.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 50 Missing cases 42 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR1_B Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 7 8.0 17.5 17.5 Zedillo 2 11 11.7 25.3 42.8 Cevallos 3 16 16.9 36.7 79.5 Ninguno 4 1 1.5 3.2 82.7 NS-NC 5 7 8.0 17.3 100.0 . 50 53.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 42 Missing cases 50 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PATR2_B mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 9 9.9 21.4 21.4 Zedillo 2 18 19.6 42.6 64.1 Cevallos 3 8 8.2 17.9 81.9 Ninguno 4 2 2.5 5.4 87.3 NS-NC 5 5 5.9 12.7 100.0 . 50 53.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 42 Missing cases 50 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR3_B Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 6 6.6 14.2 14.2 Zedillo 2 13 14.1 30.5 44.8 Cevallos 3 18 19.2 41.6 86.4 Ninguno 4 2 2.3 5.1 91.5 NS-NC 5 4 3.9 8.5 100.0 . 50 53.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 42 Missing cases 50 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PATR4_B Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 11 11.8 25.6 25.6 Zedillo 2 15 16.6 36.0 61.5 Cevallos 3 9 9.5 20.7 82.2 Ninguno 4 3 2.7 5.9 88.1 NS-NC 5 5 5.5 11.9 100.0 . 50 53.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 42 Missing cases 50 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR5_B Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 11 11.9 25.8 25.8 Zedillo 2 11 12.4 26.8 52.6 Cevallos 3 10 11.0 23.9 76.5 Ninguno 4 3 3.6 7.8 84.3 NS-NC 5 7 7.3 15.7 100.0 . 50 53.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 42 Missing cases 50 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PATR6_B Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 8 8.2 17.8 17.8 Zedillo 2 8 8.9 19.4 37.2 Cevallos 3 6 6.5 14.1 51.3 Ninguno 4 4 4.8 10.5 61.8 NS-NC 5 16 17.6 38.2 100.0 . 50 53.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 42 Missing cases 50 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR7_B MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 8 8.4 18.3 18.3 Zedillo 2 15 16.3 35.5 53.8 Cevallos 3 13 14.7 31.8 85.6 Ninguno 4 1 .8 1.7 87.3 NS-NC 5 5 5.9 12.7 100.0 . 50 53.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 42 Missing cases 50 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PATR8_B PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 6 6.8 14.7 14.7 Zedillo 2 13 13.8 29.9 44.6 Cevallos 3 10 11.0 23.8 68.4 Ninguno 4 8 8.5 18.4 86.7 NS-NC 5 6 6.1 13.3 100.0 . 50 53.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 42 Missing cases 50 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR9_B Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 8 8.8 19.1 19.1 Zedillo 2 10 10.9 23.8 42.9 Cevallos 3 16 17.6 38.1 81.0 Ninguno 4 4 4.0 8.6 89.6 NS-NC 5 4 4.8 10.4 100.0 . 50 53.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 42 Missing cases 50 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PVOT1_A VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 4 3.9 12.5 12.5 UNO 1 18 20.0 64.5 77.0 DOS 2 1 .8 2.5 79.5 TRES 3 2 1.8 5.9 85.3 CINCO 5 4 4.5 14.7 100.0 . 64 69.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 28 Missing cases 64 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT2_A VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.0 2.9 2.9 UNO 1 9 9.6 28.8 31.7 DOS 2 11 11.8 35.5 67.2 TRES 3 6 6.7 20.2 87.4 CINCO 5 4 4.2 12.6 100.0 . 61 66.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 31 Missing cases 61 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT3_A VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 11 12.4 38.9 38.9 DOS 2 5 5.2 16.4 55.3 TRES 3 9 10.0 31.5 86.8 CINCO 5 4 4.2 13.2 100.0 . 63 68.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 29 Missing cases 63 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PVOT4_A VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 3 2.9 100.0 100.0 . 89 97.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 89 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT5_A VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 3 2.9 100.0 100.0 . 89 97.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 89 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT6_A VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 .9 6.9 6.9 UNO 1 6 6.8 54.5 61.4 DOS 2 3 3.1 24.6 85.9 TRES 3 1 .8 6.2 92.1 CUATRO 4 1 1.0 7.9 100.0 . 81 87.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 11 Missing cases 81 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PVOT7_A VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 .9 34.5 34.5 UNO 1 1 1.6 65.5 100.0 . 90 97.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 90 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT8_A VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 3 2.9 100.0 100.0 . 89 97.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 89 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT9_A VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 3 2.9 78.9 78.9 CINCO 5 1 .8 21.1 100.0 . 89 96.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 89 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PVOT10_A VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 3 2.9 78.9 78.9 UNO 1 1 .8 21.1 100.0 . 89 96.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 89 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT11_A VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 3 2.9 50.2 50.2 UNO 1 1 1.6 28.3 78.5 CINCO 5 1 1.2 21.5 100.0 . 87 94.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 5 Missing cases 87 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT12_A VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 .9 11.8 11.8 DOS 2 1 1.6 21.6 33.4 CINCO 5 4 4.8 66.6 100.0 . 85 92.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 7 Missing cases 85 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PVOT13_A VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 3 2.9 56.5 56.5 CINCO 5 2 2.2 43.5 100.0 . 87 94.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 5 Missing cases 87 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT1_B VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 2 2.3 11.6 11.6 UNO 1 5 5.5 27.3 38.9 DOS 2 5 5.0 24.8 63.7 TRES 3 2 2.3 11.6 75.3 CINCO 5 5 5.0 24.7 100.0 . 73 79.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 19 Missing cases 73 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT2_B VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 7 7.7 33.0 33.0 DOS 2 4 4.7 20.2 53.1 TRES 3 6 6.2 26.3 79.4 CUATRO 4 1 .9 3.7 83.1 CINCO 5 4 4.0 16.9 100.0 . 70 76.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 22 Missing cases 70 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PVOT3_B VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.2 5.3 5.3 UNO 1 8 8.9 38.1 43.4 DOS 2 6 6.1 26.0 69.4 TRES 3 3 3.3 14.3 83.7 CINCO 5 3 3.8 16.3 100.0 . 71 76.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 21 Missing cases 71 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4_B VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 3 3.3 81.1 81.1 DOS 2 1 .8 18.9 100.0 . 88 95.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 88 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT5_B VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 1.8 100.0 100.0 . 90 98.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 90 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PVOT6_B VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DOS 2 1 1.2 31.3 31.3 TRES 3 1 1.5 37.5 68.7 CINCO 5 1 1.2 31.3 100.0 . 88 96.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 88 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7_B VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DOS 2 1 .9 100.0 100.0 . 91 99.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 91 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT8_B VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 92 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 92 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PVOT9_B VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 92 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 92 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10_B VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 92 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 92 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT11_B VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DOS 2 1 .9 30.6 30.6 CINCO 5 2 1.9 69.4 100.0 . 89 97.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 89 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PVOT12_B VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 1 1.6 100.0 100.0 . 91 98.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 91 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13_B VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DOS 2 1 1.2 17.0 17.0 CINCO 5 6 6.0 83.0 100.0 . 85 92.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 7 Missing cases 85 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT1 VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 51 55.0 55.0 55.0 UNO 1 23 25.5 25.5 80.5 DOS 2 5 5.8 5.8 86.3 TRES 3 4 4.2 4.2 90.4 CINCO 5 9 9.6 9.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PVOT2 VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 41 44.2 44.2 44.2 UNO 1 16 17.3 17.3 61.5 DOS 2 15 16.6 16.6 78.0 TRES 3 12 12.9 12.9 91.0 CUATRO 4 1 .9 .9 91.8 CINCO 5 8 8.2 8.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT3 VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 42 46.0 46.0 46.0 UNO 1 20 21.3 21.3 67.3 DOS 2 10 11.3 11.3 78.6 TRES 3 12 13.4 13.4 92.0 CINCO 5 7 8.0 8.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4 VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 88 95.9 95.9 95.9 UNO 1 3 3.3 3.3 99.2 DOS 2 1 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PVOT5 VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 90 98.2 98.2 98.2 UNO 1 2 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT6 VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 78 84.4 84.4 84.4 UNO 1 6 6.8 6.8 91.2 DOS 2 4 4.3 4.3 95.5 TRES 3 2 2.3 2.3 97.8 CUATRO 4 1 1.0 1.0 98.8 CINCO 5 1 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7 VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 90 97.5 97.5 97.5 UNO 1 1 1.6 1.6 99.1 DOS 2 1 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PVOT8 VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 92 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT9 VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 91 99.2 99.2 99.2 CINCO 5 1 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10 VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 91 99.2 99.2 99.2 UNO 1 1 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 32 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PVOT11 VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 87 94.3 94.3 94.3 UNO 1 1 1.6 1.6 96.0 DOS 2 1 .9 .9 96.8 CINCO 5 3 3.2 3.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT12 VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 85 92.0 92.0 92.0 DOS 2 1 1.6 1.6 93.6 CINCO 5 6 6.4 6.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13 VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 83 90.5 90.5 90.5 DOS 2 1 1.2 1.2 91.7 CINCO 5 8 8.3 8.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 33 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PELE SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 25 27.3 27.5 27.5 CCS del PRD 2 15 16.0 16.1 43.6 DFC del PAN 3 25 26.8 27.0 70.7 Otro 4 1 1.0 1.0 71.7 Por ninguno 5 6 6.0 6.0 77.7 No sabe 6 6 6.4 6.4 84.1 No contestó 7 14 15.7 15.9 100.0 0 1 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE_A SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA A Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 14 15.2 28.6 28.6 CCS del PRD 2 4 4.1 7.7 36.2 DFC del PAN 3 14 15.5 29.2 65.4 Otro 4 1 1.0 1.8 67.2 Por ninguno 5 3 3.5 6.6 73.8 No sabe 6 3 3.3 6.3 80.0 No contestó 7 10 10.6 20.0 100.0 . 43 46.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 49 Missing cases 43 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 34 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PELE_B SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA B Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 11 12.2 26.4 26.4 CCS del PRD 2 11 11.9 25.8 52.2 DFC del PAN 3 10 11.3 24.6 76.8 Por ninguno 5 2 2.5 5.4 82.2 No sabe 6 3 3.1 6.6 88.9 No contestó 7 5 5.1 11.1 100.0 . 50 53.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 42 Missing cases 50 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 43 46.5 46.5 46.5 femenino 2 49 53.5 53.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 26 28.6 28.6 28.6 26-40 2 35 37.6 37.6 66.2 41-60 3 22 23.5 23.5 89.7 61 + 4 9 10.3 10.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 35 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE INST Institución donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 51 55.6 55.6 55.6 gob fed 2 10 10.7 10.7 66.3 paraestatal 3 1 1.0 1.0 67.3 emp priv 4 17 18.2 18.2 85.5 negocio prop 5 7 7.5 7.5 93.1 independiente 6 6 6.9 6.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 32 34.5 62.1 62.1 estudiante 2 10 10.6 19.1 81.2 jubilado 3 5 5.4 9.7 90.9 desemp 4 3 3.5 6.3 97.2 otro 5 1 1.6 2.8 100.0 0 41 44.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 51 Missing cases 41 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACTIV Rama de actividad económica Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent industria 2 3 3.3 7.3 7.3 comercio 3 13 13.9 31.2 38.6 educación 5 5 4.9 11.1 49.7 otros servs 6 21 22.3 50.3 100.0 0 51 55.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 41 Missing cases 51 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 36 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE PUESTO Que puesto ocupa en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario, Patron o 1 2 2.6 5.9 5.9 Directivo o Func de 2 3 3.7 8.4 14.2 Contratista o trabaj 3 10 10.8 24.4 38.6 Profesionista Indepe 4 2 2.0 4.5 43.2 Emplea, trabaj, Obre 5 23 25.2 56.8 100.0 0 51 55.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 41 Missing cases 51 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent prim inc 2 4 4.6 4.6 4.6 prim comp 3 11 12.0 12.0 16.5 sec incom 4 4 4.6 4.6 21.1 sec comp 5 20 21.2 21.2 42.3 prep incom 6 9 9.7 9.7 52.1 prep comp 7 19 20.4 20.4 72.5 univ incom 8 8 8.3 8.3 80.7 univ comp + 9 18 19.3 19.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 37 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 5 5.0 5.0 5.0 1-3 sm 2 17 18.9 18.9 23.9 3-5 sm 3 25 27.1 27.1 50.9 5-7 sm 4 5 5.3 5.3 56.3 7-10 5 9 10.3 10.3 66.6 10 + SM 6 18 20.1 20.1 86.6 7 12 13.4 13.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 92 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 38 ROLLOVER (77) DF 12/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/12/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL9DF.FRE This procedure was completed at 20:16:12 End of Include file.