The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 352 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 6566 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 821 Value Labels for each Variable. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 4 ROLL OVER (7) JALISCO 7/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/8/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL70295.PON P1 SITUACION ECONOMICA COMUNIDAD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 16 4.5 4.5 4.5 Igual 2 36 10.2 10.2 14.8 Peor 3 294 83.5 83.5 98.3 No sabe 4 1 .3 .3 98.6 No contestó 5 5 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 352 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 SATISFECHO CON NIVEL DE VIDA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 144 40.9 41.0 41.0 Si parte 2 46 13.1 13.1 54.1 No 3 160 45.5 45.6 99.7 No contestó 4 1 .3 .3 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 351 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PEST6 QUIEN LE INSPIRA CONFIANZA... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 126 35.8 35.8 35.8 A Cárdenas J 2 128 36.4 36.4 72.2 Mario Saucedo 3 12 3.4 3.4 75.6 Ninguno 4 21 6.0 6.0 81.5 No sabe 5 45 12.8 12.8 94.3 No contestó 6 20 5.7 5.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 352 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 5 ROLL OVER (7) JALISCO 7/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/8/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL70295.PON P4 SITUACION ECON PROX AÑO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 152 43.2 43.3 43.3 Igual 2 30 8.5 8.5 51.9 Peor 3 74 21.0 21.1 72.9 No sabe 4 81 23.0 23.1 96.0 No contestó 5 14 4.0 4.0 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 351 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 QUIEN PARA PROX GOBERNADOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 122 34.7 34.7 34.7 A Cárdenas J 2 126 35.8 35.8 70.5 Mario Saucedo 3 14 4.0 4.0 74.4 Ninguno 4 10 2.8 2.8 77.3 No sabe 5 53 15.1 15.1 92.3 No contestó 6 27 7.7 7.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 352 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6 SITUACION ECONOMICA FAMILIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 56 15.9 15.9 15.9 Igual 2 66 18.8 18.8 34.7 Peor 3 219 62.2 62.2 96.9 No sabe 4 6 1.7 1.7 98.6 No contestó 5 5 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 352 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 6 ROLL OVER (7) JALISCO 7/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/8/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL70295.PON PELE7 SI HOY ELECC JAL POR QUIEN VOTA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Eugenio Ruiz PRI 1 119 33.8 33.8 33.8 A Cárdenas J PAN 2 124 35.2 35.2 69.0 M Saucedo PRD 3 18 5.1 5.1 74.1 Otro 4 1 .3 .3 74.4 Ninguno 5 15 4.3 4.3 78.7 No sabe 6 39 11.1 11.1 89.8 No contestó 7 36 10.2 10.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 352 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7_1 ACUERDO CON..Pte de la República Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Acuerdo 1 140 39.8 39.8 39.8 Desacuerdo 2 114 32.4 32.4 72.2 No sabe 3 57 16.2 16.2 88.4 No contestó 4 41 11.6 11.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 352 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7_2 ACUERDO CON..Gobernador Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Acuerdo 1 176 50.0 50.0 50.0 Desacuerdo 2 123 34.9 34.9 84.9 No sabe 3 27 7.7 7.7 92.6 No contestó 4 26 7.4 7.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 352 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 ROLL OVER (7) JALISCO 7/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/8/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL70295.PON P7_3 ACUERDO CON..Pdte. Municipal Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Acuerdo 1 154 43.8 43.8 43.8 Desacuerdo 2 135 38.4 38.4 82.1 No sabe 3 33 9.4 9.4 91.5 No contestó 4 30 8.5 8.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 352 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL1 VOTOS A..Eugenio Ruiz O PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 39 11.1 21.4 21.4 DOS 2 43 12.2 23.6 45.1 TRES 3 27 7.7 14.8 59.9 CUATRO 4 5 1.4 2.7 62.6 CINCO 5 68 19.3 37.4 100.0 0 170 48.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 182 Missing cases 170 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL2 VOTOS A..Alberto Cárdenas PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 28 8.0 15.3 15.3 DOS 2 37 10.5 20.2 35.5 TRES 3 43 12.2 23.5 59.0 CUATRO 4 12 3.4 6.6 65.6 CINCO 5 63 17.9 34.4 100.0 0 169 48.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 183 Missing cases 169 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 ROLL OVER (7) JALISCO 7/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/8/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL70295.PON PBOL3 VOTOS A..Mario Saucedo PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 56 15.9 75.7 75.7 DOS 2 5 1.4 6.8 82.4 TRES 3 4 1.1 5.4 87.8 CINCO 5 9 2.6 12.2 100.0 0 278 79.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 74 Missing cases 278 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL4 VOTOS A..Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 7 2.0 43.8 43.8 DOS 2 4 1.1 25.0 68.8 TRES 3 1 .3 6.3 75.0 CINCO 5 4 1.1 25.0 100.0 0 336 95.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 16 Missing cases 336 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL5 VOTOS A..A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 4 1.1 19.0 19.0 DOS 2 1 .3 4.8 23.8 CUATRO 4 1 .3 4.8 28.6 CINCO 5 15 4.3 71.4 100.0 0 331 94.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 21 Missing cases 331 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 ROLL OVER (7) JALISCO 7/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/8/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL70295.PON PBOL6 VOTOS A..No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DOS 2 2 .6 4.5 4.5 TRES 3 1 .3 2.3 6.8 CINCO 5 41 11.6 93.2 100.0 0 308 87.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 44 Missing cases 308 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL7 VOTOS A..No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DOS 2 1 .3 3.4 3.4 CINCO 5 28 8.0 96.6 100.0 0 323 91.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 29 Missing cases 323 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR1 QUIEN ES..Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 129 36.6 36.6 36.6 Alberto Cardenas 2 78 22.2 22.2 58.8 Mario Saucedo 3 16 4.5 4.5 63.4 Ninguno 4 6 1.7 1.7 65.1 No Sabe/No C 5 123 34.9 34.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 352 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 ROLL OVER (7) JALISCO 7/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/8/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL70295.PON PATR2 QUIEN ES..Más experiencia Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 172 48.9 48.9 48.9 Alberto Cardenas 2 67 19.0 19.0 67.9 Mario Saucedo 3 7 2.0 2.0 69.9 Ninguno 4 10 2.8 2.8 72.7 No Sabe/No C 5 96 27.3 27.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 352 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR3 QUIEN ES..Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 156 44.3 44.3 44.3 Alberto Cardenas 2 94 26.7 26.7 71.0 Mario Saucedo 3 12 3.4 3.4 74.4 Ninguno 4 8 2.3 2.3 76.7 No Sabe/No C 5 82 23.3 23.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 352 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR4 QUIEN ES..Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 135 38.4 38.4 38.4 Alberto Cardenas 2 112 31.8 31.8 70.2 Mario Saucedo 3 12 3.4 3.4 73.6 Ninguno 4 15 4.3 4.3 77.8 No Sabe/No C 5 78 22.2 22.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 352 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 ROLL OVER (7) JALISCO 7/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/8/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL70295.PON PATR5 QUIEN ES..Mejor opción para edo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 112 31.8 31.9 31.9 Alberto Cardenas 2 132 37.5 37.6 69.5 Mario Saucedo 3 9 2.6 2.6 72.1 Ninguno 4 6 1.7 1.7 73.8 No Sabe/No C 5 92 26.1 26.2 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 351 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6 QUIEN ES..Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 86 24.4 24.5 24.5 Alberto Cardenas 2 85 24.1 24.2 48.7 Mario Saucedo 3 5 1.4 1.4 50.1 Ninguno 4 25 7.1 7.1 57.3 No Sabe/No C 5 150 42.6 42.7 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 351 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 ROLL OVER (7) JALISCO 7/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/8/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL70295.PON PATR7 QUIEN ES..Más personalidad Gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 142 40.3 40.5 40.5 Alberto Cardenas 2 111 31.5 31.6 72.1 Mario Saucedo 3 10 2.8 2.8 74.9 Ninguno 4 7 2.0 2.0 76.9 No Sabe/No C 5 81 23.0 23.1 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 351 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8 QUIEN ES..Puede resolver pobreza Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 89 25.3 25.4 25.4 Alberto Cardenas 2 82 23.3 23.4 48.9 Mario Saucedo 3 6 1.7 1.7 50.6 Ninguno 4 48 13.6 13.7 64.3 No Sabe/No C 5 125 35.5 35.7 100.0 0 2 .6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 350 Missing cases 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 ROLL OVER (7) JALISCO 7/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/8/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL70295.PON PATR9 QUIEN ES..Habla mas con verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 87 24.7 24.8 24.8 Alberto Cardenas 2 94 26.7 26.8 51.6 Mario Saucedo 3 12 3.4 3.4 55.0 Ninguno 4 38 10.8 10.8 65.8 No Sabe/No C 5 120 34.1 34.2 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 351 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8 CUALIDAD PARA EL PROXIMO GOBERNADOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXPERIENCIA-INTELIG 1 133 37.8 37.8 37.8 OPCION DE CAMBIO 2 153 43.5 43.5 81.3 NINGUNA 3 11 3.1 3.1 84.4 NS-NC 4 55 15.6 15.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 352 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 176 50.0 50.0 50.0 femenino 2 176 50.0 50.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 352 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 ROLL OVER (7) JALISCO 7/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/8/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL70295.PON EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 95 27.0 27.0 27.0 26-40 2 145 41.2 41.2 68.2 41-60 3 81 23.0 23.0 91.2 61 + 4 31 8.8 8.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 352 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INST Institución donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 165 46.9 46.9 46.9 gob fed 2 26 7.4 7.4 54.3 paraestatal 3 4 1.1 1.1 55.4 emp priv 4 72 20.5 20.5 75.9 negocio prop 5 32 9.1 9.1 84.9 independiente 6 53 15.1 15.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 352 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 116 33.0 70.3 70.3 estudiante 2 28 8.0 17.0 87.3 jubilado 3 9 2.6 5.5 92.7 desemp 4 3 .9 1.8 94.5 otro 5 9 2.6 5.5 100.0 0 187 53.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 165 Missing cases 187 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 ROLL OVER (7) JALISCO 7/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/8/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL70295.PON ACTIV Rama de actividad económica Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent agric 1 10 2.8 5.3 5.3 industria 2 22 6.3 11.8 17.1 comercio 3 44 12.5 23.5 40.6 construc 4 4 1.1 2.1 42.8 educación 5 12 3.4 6.4 49.2 otros servs 6 95 27.0 50.8 100.0 0 165 46.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 187 Missing cases 165 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUESTO Que puesto ocupa en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario, Patron o 1 9 2.6 4.8 4.8 Directivo o Func de 2 2 .6 1.1 5.9 Contratista o trabaj 3 51 14.5 27.3 33.2 Profesionista Indepe 4 18 5.1 9.6 42.8 Emplea, trabaj, Obre 5 107 30.4 57.2 100.0 0 165 46.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 187 Missing cases 165 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 ROLL OVER (7) JALISCO 7/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/8/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL70295.PON ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 13 3.7 3.7 3.7 prim inc 2 36 10.2 10.2 13.9 prim comp 3 53 15.1 15.1 29.0 sec incom 4 8 2.3 2.3 31.3 sec comp 5 83 23.6 23.6 54.8 prep incom 6 25 7.1 7.1 61.9 prep comp 7 43 12.2 12.2 74.1 univ incom 8 25 7.1 7.1 81.3 univ comp + 9 66 18.8 18.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 352 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 19 5.4 5.4 5.4 1-3 sm 2 80 22.7 22.7 28.1 3-5 sm 3 68 19.3 19.3 47.4 5-7 sm 4 22 6.3 6.3 53.7 7-10 5 35 9.9 9.9 63.6 10 + SM 6 53 15.1 15.1 78.7 7 75 21.3 21.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 352 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 352 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 ROLL OVER (7) JALISCO 7/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/8/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL70295.PON This procedure was completed at 11:13:22 End of Include file.