The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 110 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 9497 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 1187 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1 SITUACION DEL PAIS MEJOR? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 30 27.3 27.3 27.3 Igual (voluntario) 2 15 13.3 13.3 40.6 Peor 3 57 51.4 51.4 92.0 No sabe 4 7 6.1 6.1 98.1 No contestó 5 2 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 SATISFECHO CON EL NIVEL DE VIDA ACTUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 51 46.4 46.4 46.4 Si en parte 2 13 11.6 11.6 58.0 No 3 46 42.0 42.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 6 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE P3 CANDIDATO INSPIRA MAS CONFIANZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas 1 8 7.2 7.2 7.2 Ernesto Zedillo 2 53 47.9 47.9 55.2 Diego Fdez. de Ceval 3 30 27.4 27.4 82.6 Ninguno 4 7 6.2 6.2 88.8 No sabe 5 8 7.5 7.5 96.4 No contestó 6 4 3.6 3.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4 PRECIOS DE COMPRA HABITALES MAS ALTOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Son más altos 1 72 65.3 65.3 65.3 No han cambiado 2 30 27.4 27.4 92.8 Son más bajos 3 4 3.8 3.8 96.6 No sabe 4 4 3.4 3.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 SIT ECONOMICA PERSONAL MEJOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 51 46.0 46.0 46.0 Igual (voluntario) 2 9 8.5 8.5 54.5 Peor 3 20 18.6 18.6 73.1 No sabe 4 24 22.2 22.2 95.2 No contestó 5 5 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE P6 QUIEN GUSTARIA FUERA PROXIMO PTE REP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas 1 8 7.6 7.6 7.6 Ernesto Zedillo 2 51 46.8 46.8 54.3 Diego Fdez. de Ceval 3 29 26.5 26.5 80.8 No sabe 5 12 10.6 10.6 91.4 No contestó 6 9 8.6 8.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7 COMO CONSID SIT ECONOM ACTUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 38 35.0 35.0 35.0 Igual (voluntario) 2 23 20.6 20.6 55.6 Peor 3 44 40.4 40.4 96.0 No sabe 4 3 2.5 2.5 98.5 No contestó 5 2 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8 ACUERDO FORMA DE GOBERNAR PRESIDENTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent De acuerdo 1 65 58.8 58.8 58.8 De acuerdo en parte 2 12 11.0 11.0 69.8 En desacuerdo 3 28 25.1 25.1 94.9 No sabe 4 4 3.6 3.6 98.5 No contestó 5 2 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PATR1 Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 9 8.6 8.6 8.6 Zedillo 2 37 33.4 33.4 42.0 Cevallos 3 32 29.1 29.1 71.1 Ninguno 4 2 1.4 1.4 72.5 NS-NC 5 30 27.5 27.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2 mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 13 12.2 12.2 12.2 Zedillo 2 51 46.2 46.2 58.4 Cevallos 3 20 18.0 18.0 76.4 Ninguno 4 9 8.6 8.6 85.0 NS-NC 5 17 15.0 15.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR3 Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 4 3.8 3.8 3.8 Zedillo 2 32 28.7 28.7 32.5 Cevallos 3 58 52.9 52.9 85.5 Ninguno 4 6 5.5 5.5 91.0 NS-NC 5 10 9.0 9.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PATR4 Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 24 21.6 21.6 21.6 Zedillo 2 47 42.3 42.3 63.9 Cevallos 3 23 20.9 20.9 84.8 Ninguno 4 5 4.6 4.6 89.5 NS-NC 5 12 10.5 10.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR5 Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 10 8.8 8.8 8.8 Zedillo 2 55 50.1 50.1 58.9 Cevallos 3 28 25.6 25.6 84.4 Ninguno 4 2 2.1 2.1 86.5 NS-NC 5 15 13.5 13.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6 Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 7 6.0 6.0 6.0 Zedillo 2 30 27.2 27.2 33.2 Cevallos 3 26 23.5 23.5 56.7 Ninguno 4 10 8.9 8.9 65.6 NS-NC 5 38 34.4 34.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PATR7 MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 10 8.9 8.9 8.9 Zedillo 2 47 42.7 42.7 51.6 Cevallos 3 39 35.3 35.3 86.9 Ninguno 4 4 3.3 3.3 90.2 NS-NC 5 11 9.8 9.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8 PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 8 7.6 7.6 7.6 Zedillo 2 43 39.3 39.3 46.9 Cevallos 3 26 23.3 23.3 70.2 Ninguno 4 16 14.2 14.2 84.4 NS-NC 5 17 15.6 15.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR9 Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 8 7.5 7.5 7.5 Zedillo 2 36 32.8 32.8 40.3 Cevallos 3 35 32.1 32.1 72.4 Ninguno 4 9 7.8 7.8 80.2 NS-NC 5 22 19.8 19.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PATR1_A Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 4 3.5 8.3 8.3 Zedillo 2 12 11.2 26.6 34.8 Cevallos 3 16 14.2 33.5 68.3 NS-NC 5 15 13.4 31.7 100.0 . 63 57.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 47 Missing cases 63 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2_A mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 6 5.4 12.8 12.8 Zedillo 2 23 20.6 48.6 61.4 Cevallos 3 7 6.8 16.1 77.4 Ninguno 4 6 5.5 13.0 90.5 NS-NC 5 4 4.0 9.5 100.0 . 63 57.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 47 Missing cases 63 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR3_A Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Zedillo 2 15 13.7 32.4 32.4 Cevallos 3 28 25.3 59.9 92.3 Ninguno 4 2 1.7 4.0 96.3 NS-NC 5 2 1.6 3.7 100.0 . 63 57.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 47 Missing cases 63 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PATR4_A Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 12 10.8 25.6 25.6 Zedillo 2 25 22.7 53.6 79.2 Cevallos 3 6 5.8 13.7 92.9 Ninguno 4 2 1.7 4.0 96.9 NS-NC 5 1 1.3 3.1 100.0 . 63 57.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 47 Missing cases 63 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR5_A Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 3 2.6 6.1 6.1 Zedillo 2 25 22.4 52.9 59.0 Cevallos 3 12 11.3 26.8 85.8 Ninguno 4 1 .6 1.5 87.3 NS-NC 5 6 5.4 12.7 100.0 . 63 57.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 47 Missing cases 63 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PATR6_A Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 2 1.5 3.6 3.6 Zedillo 2 12 10.9 25.8 29.4 Cevallos 3 12 10.6 25.1 54.5 Ninguno 4 5 4.9 11.5 66.0 NS-NC 5 16 14.4 34.0 100.0 . 63 57.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 47 Missing cases 63 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR7_A MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 3 2.9 6.9 6.9 Zedillo 2 21 18.7 44.1 51.0 Cevallos 3 19 17.3 40.9 91.9 Ninguno 4 1 1.1 2.5 94.4 NS-NC 5 3 2.4 5.6 100.0 . 63 57.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 47 Missing cases 63 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PATR8_A PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 2 1.4 3.2 3.2 Zedillo 2 20 17.7 41.9 45.2 Cevallos 3 10 9.1 21.5 66.7 Ninguno 4 10 9.0 21.2 88.0 NS-NC 5 6 5.1 12.0 100.0 . 63 57.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 47 Missing cases 63 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR9_A Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 1 .7 1.6 1.6 Zedillo 2 15 13.3 31.5 33.2 Cevallos 3 18 16.6 39.2 72.3 Ninguno 4 4 3.4 8.0 80.3 NS-NC 5 9 8.3 19.7 100.0 . 63 57.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 47 Missing cases 63 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PATR1_B Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 6 5.1 8.8 8.8 Zedillo 2 24 22.2 38.5 47.3 Cevallos 3 16 14.9 25.9 73.1 Ninguno 4 2 1.4 2.5 75.6 NS-NC 5 15 14.1 24.4 100.0 . 47 42.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 63 Missing cases 47 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2_B mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 8 6.8 11.8 11.8 Zedillo 2 28 25.6 44.4 56.2 Cevallos 3 12 11.2 19.4 75.6 Ninguno 4 3 3.1 5.4 80.9 NS-NC 5 12 11.0 19.1 100.0 . 47 42.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 63 Missing cases 47 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PATR3_B Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 4 3.8 6.6 6.6 Zedillo 2 17 15.0 26.0 32.6 Cevallos 3 30 27.6 47.9 80.5 Ninguno 4 4 3.8 6.6 87.1 NS-NC 5 8 7.5 12.9 100.0 . 47 42.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 63 Missing cases 47 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR4_B Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 12 10.8 18.7 18.7 Zedillo 2 22 19.7 34.1 52.7 Cevallos 3 17 15.1 26.2 78.9 Ninguno 4 3 2.9 5.1 84.0 NS-NC 5 10 9.2 16.0 100.0 . 47 42.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 63 Missing cases 47 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PATR5_B Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 7 6.2 10.7 10.7 Zedillo 2 30 27.7 48.0 58.7 Cevallos 3 16 14.2 24.7 83.4 Ninguno 4 2 1.4 2.5 85.9 NS-NC 5 9 8.2 14.1 100.0 . 47 42.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 63 Missing cases 47 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6_B Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 5 4.5 7.8 7.8 Zedillo 2 18 16.3 28.2 36.0 Cevallos 3 14 12.9 22.4 58.4 Ninguno 4 4 4.0 7.0 65.3 NS-NC 5 22 20.0 34.7 100.0 . 47 42.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 63 Missing cases 47 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PATR7_B MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 7 6.0 10.4 10.4 Zedillo 2 26 24.0 41.7 52.0 Cevallos 3 20 18.0 31.2 83.2 Ninguno 4 2 2.3 3.9 87.1 NS-NC 5 8 7.4 12.9 100.0 . 47 42.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 63 Missing cases 47 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8_B PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 7 6.2 10.7 10.7 Zedillo 2 24 21.6 37.4 48.1 Cevallos 3 16 14.2 24.7 72.8 Ninguno 4 6 5.2 9.1 81.8 NS-NC 5 12 10.5 18.2 100.0 . 47 42.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 63 Missing cases 47 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PATR9_B Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 8 6.8 11.8 11.8 Zedillo 2 21 19.4 33.7 45.5 Cevallos 3 17 15.5 26.9 72.5 Ninguno 4 5 4.4 7.7 80.1 NS-NC 5 13 11.5 19.9 100.0 . 47 42.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 63 Missing cases 47 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT1_A VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 .9 4.9 4.9 UNO 1 13 11.7 65.8 70.7 DOS 2 5 4.5 25.4 96.1 TRES 3 1 .7 3.9 100.0 . 90 82.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 20 Missing cases 90 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT2_A VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 11 9.7 28.5 28.5 DOS 2 7 6.2 18.1 46.6 TRES 3 10 9.3 27.4 74.0 CUATRO 4 3 2.8 8.4 82.4 CINCO 5 7 6.0 17.6 100.0 . 73 66.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 37 Missing cases 73 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PVOT3_A VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 .8 2.8 2.8 UNO 1 15 13.8 45.1 47.9 DOS 2 7 6.6 21.4 69.3 TRES 3 4 3.5 11.5 80.8 CUATRO 4 2 2.1 6.7 87.5 CINCO 5 4 3.8 12.5 100.0 . 76 69.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 34 Missing cases 76 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4_A VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 110 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 110 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT5_A VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 110 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 110 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PVOT6_A VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 7 6.1 100.0 100.0 . 103 93.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 7 Missing cases 103 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7_A VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 3 2.8 72.6 72.6 CUATRO 4 1 1.1 27.4 100.0 . 106 96.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 106 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT8_A VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 110 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 110 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PVOT9_A VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 110 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 110 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10_A VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 1 .7 100.0 100.0 . 109 99.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 109 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT11_A VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 1 .6 100.0 100.0 . 109 99.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 109 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PVOT12_A VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 110 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 110 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13_A VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 3 2.6 100.0 100.0 . 107 97.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 107 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT1_B VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 2 1.5 6.5 6.5 UNO 1 9 8.3 36.8 43.4 DOS 2 6 5.8 25.7 69.1 TRES 3 1 .6 2.8 71.9 CINCO 5 7 6.4 28.1 100.0 . 85 77.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 25 Missing cases 85 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PVOT2_B VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 5 4.2 14.8 14.8 DOS 2 5 4.6 16.2 31.0 TRES 3 8 7.4 25.9 56.9 CINCO 5 14 12.3 43.1 100.0 . 79 71.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 31 Missing cases 79 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT3_B VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 4 3.6 16.3 16.3 DOS 2 11 10.2 45.6 61.9 TRES 3 3 2.5 11.3 73.2 CUATRO 4 2 1.7 7.8 81.0 CINCO 5 5 4.3 19.0 100.0 . 85 77.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 25 Missing cases 85 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4_B VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .8 100.0 100.0 . 109 99.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 109 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PVOT5_B VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .6 100.0 100.0 . 109 99.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 109 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT6_B VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 1.1 55.6 55.6 DOS 2 1 .8 44.4 100.0 . 108 98.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 108 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7_B VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 1 .7 100.0 100.0 . 109 99.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 109 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PVOT8_B VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 110 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 110 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT9_B VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 110 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 110 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10_B VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 110 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 110 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PVOT11_B VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DOS 2 1 .6 29.0 29.0 CINCO 5 2 1.6 71.0 100.0 . 108 97.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 108 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT12_B VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 9 7.8 100.0 100.0 . 101 92.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 9 Missing cases 101 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13_B VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 5 4.4 100.0 100.0 . 105 95.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 5 Missing cases 105 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PVOT1 VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 68 61.9 61.9 61.9 UNO 1 22 20.0 20.0 82.0 DOS 2 11 10.3 10.3 92.3 TRES 3 1 1.3 1.3 93.6 CINCO 5 7 6.4 6.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT2 VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 41 37.5 37.5 37.5 UNO 1 15 13.9 13.9 51.4 DOS 2 12 10.8 10.8 62.2 TRES 3 18 16.7 16.7 78.9 CUATRO 4 3 2.8 2.8 81.7 CINCO 5 20 18.3 18.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT3 VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 53 47.8 47.8 47.8 UNO 1 19 17.5 17.5 65.3 DOS 2 18 16.8 16.8 82.0 TRES 3 7 6.1 6.1 88.1 CUATRO 4 4 3.8 3.8 91.9 CINCO 5 9 8.1 8.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PVOT4 VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 109 99.2 99.2 99.2 UNO 1 1 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT5 VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 109 99.4 99.4 99.4 UNO 1 1 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT6 VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 101 92.0 92.0 92.0 UNO 1 8 7.1 7.1 99.2 DOS 2 1 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PVOT7 VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 105 95.4 95.4 95.4 UNO 1 3 2.8 2.8 98.3 CUATRO 4 1 1.1 1.1 99.3 CINCO 5 1 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT8 VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 110 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT9 VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 110 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PVOT10 VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 109 99.3 99.3 99.3 CINCO 5 1 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT11 VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 107 97.2 97.2 97.2 DOS 2 1 .6 .6 97.8 CINCO 5 2 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT12 VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 101 92.2 92.2 92.2 CINCO 5 9 7.8 7.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 32 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PVOT13 VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 102 93.0 93.0 93.0 CINCO 5 8 7.0 7.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 53 47.9 47.9 47.9 CCS del PRD 2 9 8.1 8.1 56.0 DFC del PAN 3 32 29.2 29.2 85.2 Otro 4 2 2.2 2.2 87.4 Por ninguno 5 2 1.5 1.5 88.9 No sabe 6 6 5.3 5.3 94.2 No contestó 7 6 5.8 5.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE_A SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA A Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 25 23.0 54.4 54.4 CCS del PRD 2 1 .7 1.6 56.1 DFC del PAN 3 14 12.6 29.7 85.8 Por ninguno 5 1 .6 1.5 87.3 No sabe 6 4 3.3 7.7 95.0 No contestó 7 2 2.1 5.0 100.0 . 63 57.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 47 Missing cases 63 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 33 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE PELE_B SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA B Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 27 24.8 43.1 43.1 CCS del PRD 2 8 7.5 12.9 56.0 DFC del PAN 3 18 16.6 28.8 84.8 Otro 4 2 2.2 3.8 88.6 Por ninguno 5 1 .8 1.5 90.0 No sabe 6 2 2.1 3.6 93.6 No contestó 7 4 3.7 6.4 100.0 . 47 42.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 63 Missing cases 47 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 51 46.5 46.5 46.5 femenino 2 59 53.5 53.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 31 28.6 28.6 28.6 26-40 2 41 37.6 37.6 66.2 41-60 3 26 23.5 23.5 89.7 61 + 4 11 10.3 10.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 34 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE INST Institución donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 53 47.7 47.7 47.7 gob fed 2 14 12.4 12.4 60.1 paraestatal 3 1 .7 .7 60.8 emp priv 4 27 24.6 24.6 85.4 negocio prop 5 6 5.1 5.1 90.4 independiente 6 11 9.6 9.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 28 25.4 53.2 53.2 estudiante 2 18 16.0 33.6 86.8 jubilado 3 3 3.1 6.5 93.3 desemp 4 1 .6 1.3 94.6 otro 5 3 2.6 5.4 100.0 0 57 52.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 53 Missing cases 57 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 35 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE ACTIV Rama de actividad económica Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent industria 2 13 11.8 22.6 22.6 comercio 3 14 12.8 24.5 47.1 construc 4 1 .8 1.6 48.7 educación 5 6 5.0 9.6 58.3 otros servs 6 24 21.8 41.7 100.0 0 53 47.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 57 Missing cases 53 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUESTO Que puesto ocupa en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario, Patron o 1 4 3.6 6.9 6.9 Directivo o Func de 2 1 .6 1.2 8.1 Contratista o trabaj 3 10 9.4 17.9 26.0 Profesionista Indepe 4 1 .8 1.6 27.6 Emplea, trabaj, Obre 5 42 37.8 72.4 100.0 0 53 47.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 57 Missing cases 53 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 36 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 2 1.7 1.7 1.7 prim inc 2 4 3.6 3.6 5.4 prim comp 3 15 14.0 14.0 19.4 sec incom 4 2 2.1 2.1 21.5 sec comp 5 24 21.7 21.7 43.2 prep incom 6 11 10.5 10.5 53.7 prep comp 7 18 16.1 16.1 69.7 univ incom 8 12 11.0 11.0 80.7 univ comp + 9 21 19.3 19.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 4 4.0 4.0 4.0 1-3 sm 2 33 30.0 30.0 33.9 3-5 sm 3 15 13.3 13.3 47.2 5-7 sm 4 8 7.6 7.6 54.9 7-10 5 7 6.5 6.5 61.4 10 + SM 6 19 17.6 17.6 79.0 7 23 21.0 21.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 110 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 37 ROLLOVER (82) DF 17/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/17/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLEDF.FRE This procedure was completed at 20:11:39 End of Include file.