The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 251 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 6505 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 813 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1 SITUACION DEL PAIS MEJOR? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 69 27.4 27.4 27.4 Igual (voluntario) 2 42 16.9 16.9 44.3 Peor 3 132 52.6 52.6 96.9 No sabe 4 8 3.1 3.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 SATISFECHO CON EL NIVEL DE VIDA ACTUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 106 42.1 42.1 42.1 Si en parte 2 28 11.2 11.2 53.3 No 3 116 46.4 46.4 99.7 No contestó 4 1 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 6 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE P3 CANDIDATO INSPIRA MAS CONFIANZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas 1 33 13.1 13.1 13.1 Ernesto Zedillo 2 88 35.0 35.1 48.2 Diego Fdez. de Ceval 3 75 30.0 30.1 78.4 Ninguno 4 26 10.4 10.4 88.8 No sabe 5 18 7.3 7.3 96.1 No contestó 6 10 3.9 3.9 100.0 . 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 250 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4 PRECIOS DE COMPRA HABITALES MAS ALTOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Son más altos 1 180 71.9 71.9 71.9 No han cambiado 2 56 22.1 22.1 94.0 Son más bajos 3 12 4.9 4.9 98.9 No sabe 4 3 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 SIT ECONOMICA PERSONAL MEJOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 117 46.6 46.8 46.8 Igual (voluntario) 2 22 8.6 8.7 55.5 Peor 3 41 16.4 16.5 71.9 No sabe 4 68 27.2 27.3 99.2 No contestó 5 2 .8 .8 100.0 . 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 250 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE P6 QUIEN GUSTARIA FUERA PROXIMO PTE REP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas 1 33 13.3 13.3 13.3 Ernesto Zedillo 2 81 32.1 32.1 45.4 Diego Fdez. de Ceval 3 84 33.5 33.5 78.9 Otro 4 8 3.4 3.4 82.3 No sabe 5 27 10.9 10.9 93.2 No contestó 6 17 6.8 6.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7 COMO CONSID SIT ECONOM ACTUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 82 32.8 32.8 32.8 Igual (voluntario) 2 72 28.8 28.8 61.6 Peor 3 90 36.0 36.0 97.6 No sabe 4 5 1.9 1.9 99.5 No contestó 5 1 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8 ACUERDO FORMA DE GOBERNAR PRESIDENTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent De acuerdo 1 135 53.7 53.7 53.7 De acuerdo en parte 2 46 18.5 18.5 72.2 En desacuerdo 3 59 23.3 23.3 95.5 No sabe 4 4 1.4 1.4 97.0 No contestó 5 8 3.0 3.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PATR1 Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 30 12.0 12.0 12.0 Zedillo 2 63 25.3 25.3 37.3 Cevallos 3 92 36.8 36.8 74.1 Ninguno 4 10 3.9 3.9 78.0 NS-NC 5 55 22.0 22.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2 mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 41 16.5 16.5 16.5 Zedillo 2 79 31.5 31.5 48.0 Cevallos 3 75 30.0 30.0 77.9 Ninguno 4 16 6.4 6.4 84.3 NS-NC 5 39 15.7 15.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR3 Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 24 9.5 9.6 9.6 Zedillo 2 54 21.5 21.6 31.2 Cevallos 3 131 52.3 52.5 83.7 Ninguno 4 6 2.4 2.4 86.2 NS-NC 5 35 13.8 13.8 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 250 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PATR4 Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 60 23.7 23.8 23.8 Zedillo 2 81 32.1 32.2 56.1 Cevallos 3 63 25.1 25.1 81.2 Ninguno 4 11 4.4 4.4 85.6 NS-NC 5 36 14.4 14.4 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 250 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR5 Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 34 13.7 13.7 13.7 Zedillo 2 80 32.0 32.1 45.8 Cevallos 3 72 28.8 28.9 74.7 Ninguno 4 12 4.9 4.9 79.6 NS-NC 5 51 20.4 20.4 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 250 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PATR6 Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 26 10.3 10.4 10.4 Zedillo 2 50 20.0 20.1 30.4 Cevallos 3 56 22.2 22.3 52.7 Ninguno 4 29 11.5 11.6 64.3 NS-NC 5 89 35.6 35.7 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 250 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR7 MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 26 10.6 10.6 10.6 Zedillo 2 90 36.0 36.1 46.7 Cevallos 3 96 38.3 38.4 85.1 Ninguno 4 7 2.7 2.7 87.8 NS-NC 5 31 12.2 12.2 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 250 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PATR8 PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 30 11.8 11.9 11.9 Zedillo 2 66 26.4 26.5 38.3 Cevallos 3 61 24.5 24.5 62.9 Ninguno 4 46 18.4 18.5 81.4 NS-NC 5 47 18.6 18.6 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 250 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR9 Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 31 12.2 12.3 12.3 Zedillo 2 47 18.8 18.9 31.3 Cevallos 3 88 35.2 35.4 66.7 Ninguno 4 29 11.5 11.6 78.3 NS-NC 5 54 21.6 21.7 100.0 0 2 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 249 Missing cases 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PATR1_A Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 11 4.3 8.1 8.1 Zedillo 2 31 12.4 23.2 31.4 Cevallos 3 52 20.7 38.8 70.2 Ninguno 4 8 3.0 5.6 75.8 NS-NC 5 32 12.9 24.2 100.0 . 117 46.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 134 Missing cases 117 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2_A mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 19 7.7 14.5 14.5 Zedillo 2 33 13.2 24.7 39.1 Cevallos 3 47 18.7 35.1 74.2 Ninguno 4 9 3.4 6.5 80.6 NS-NC 5 26 10.3 19.4 100.0 . 117 46.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 134 Missing cases 117 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PATR3_A Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 9 3.8 7.1 7.1 Zedillo 2 23 9.2 17.4 24.5 Cevallos 3 73 29.1 54.9 79.5 Ninguno 4 3 1.1 2.1 81.6 NS-NC 5 24 9.8 18.4 100.0 . 118 47.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 133 Missing cases 118 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR4_A Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 32 12.8 24.1 24.1 Zedillo 2 32 12.9 24.4 48.4 Cevallos 3 38 15.2 28.7 77.2 Ninguno 4 7 2.7 5.1 82.3 NS-NC 5 24 9.4 17.7 100.0 . 118 47.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 133 Missing cases 118 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PATR5_A Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 11 4.5 8.5 8.5 Zedillo 2 40 16.1 30.3 38.8 Cevallos 3 46 18.4 34.8 73.6 Ninguno 4 8 3.3 6.1 79.8 NS-NC 5 27 10.7 20.2 100.0 . 118 47.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 133 Missing cases 118 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6_A Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 9 3.5 6.6 6.6 Zedillo 2 21 8.4 15.9 22.4 Cevallos 3 35 13.9 26.2 48.6 Ninguno 4 19 7.6 14.3 62.9 NS-NC 5 49 19.7 37.1 100.0 . 118 47.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 133 Missing cases 118 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PATR7_A MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 10 4.0 7.5 7.5 Zedillo 2 49 19.4 36.7 44.2 Cevallos 3 51 20.1 38.0 82.2 Ninguno 4 5 2.1 3.9 86.0 NS-NC 5 19 7.4 14.0 100.0 . 118 47.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 133 Missing cases 118 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8_A PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 13 5.0 9.4 9.4 Zedillo 2 31 12.2 23.1 32.5 Cevallos 3 32 12.7 23.9 56.3 Ninguno 4 28 11.2 21.1 77.4 NS-NC 5 30 12.0 22.6 100.0 . 118 47.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 133 Missing cases 118 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PATR9_A Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 14 5.5 10.4 10.4 Zedillo 2 23 9.3 17.6 28.0 Cevallos 3 49 19.6 37.0 65.0 Ninguno 4 16 6.5 12.2 77.2 NS-NC 5 30 12.1 22.8 100.0 . 118 47.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 133 Missing cases 118 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR1_B Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 19 7.7 16.4 16.4 Zedillo 2 32 12.9 27.6 44.0 Cevallos 3 40 16.1 34.5 78.5 Ninguno 4 2 .9 2.0 80.5 NS-NC 5 23 9.1 19.5 100.0 . 134 53.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 117 Missing cases 134 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PATR2_B mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 22 8.7 18.8 18.8 Zedillo 2 46 18.4 39.4 58.2 Cevallos 3 28 11.2 24.1 82.2 Ninguno 4 7 2.9 6.3 88.5 NS-NC 5 13 5.4 11.5 100.0 . 134 53.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 117 Missing cases 134 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR3_B Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 15 5.8 12.4 12.4 Zedillo 2 31 12.3 26.4 38.8 Cevallos 3 58 23.2 49.8 88.6 Ninguno 4 3 1.3 2.8 91.3 NS-NC 5 10 4.0 8.7 100.0 . 134 53.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 117 Missing cases 134 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PATR4_B Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 28 11.0 23.6 23.6 Zedillo 2 48 19.2 41.2 64.7 Cevallos 3 25 9.8 21.1 85.8 Ninguno 4 4 1.6 3.5 89.3 NS-NC 5 12 5.0 10.7 100.0 . 134 53.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 117 Missing cases 134 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR5_B Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 23 9.2 19.6 19.6 Zedillo 2 40 15.9 34.2 53.8 Cevallos 3 26 10.3 22.1 75.9 Ninguno 4 4 1.6 3.4 79.4 NS-NC 5 24 9.6 20.6 100.0 . 134 53.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 117 Missing cases 134 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PATR6_B Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 17 6.9 14.7 14.7 Zedillo 2 29 11.6 24.9 39.6 Cevallos 3 21 8.3 17.8 57.3 Ninguno 4 10 4.0 8.5 65.8 NS-NC 5 40 15.9 34.2 100.0 . 134 53.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 117 Missing cases 134 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR7_B MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 17 6.6 14.1 14.1 Zedillo 2 42 16.5 35.5 49.6 Cevallos 3 46 18.1 38.9 88.5 Ninguno 4 2 .6 1.3 89.8 NS-NC 5 12 4.8 10.2 100.0 . 134 53.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 117 Missing cases 134 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PATR8_B PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 17 6.8 14.7 14.7 Zedillo 2 36 14.2 30.4 45.1 Cevallos 3 30 11.8 25.3 70.4 Ninguno 4 18 7.2 15.5 85.8 NS-NC 5 17 6.6 14.2 100.0 . 134 53.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 117 Missing cases 134 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR9_B Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 17 6.7 14.5 14.5 Zedillo 2 24 9.5 20.4 35.0 Cevallos 3 39 15.5 33.6 68.5 Ninguno 4 13 5.1 11.0 79.5 NS-NC 5 24 9.5 20.5 100.0 . 135 53.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 116 Missing cases 135 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PVOT1_A VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 8 3.3 14.6 14.6 UNO 1 34 13.4 59.3 73.9 DOS 2 4 1.7 7.7 81.6 TRES 3 2 .9 3.8 85.4 CINCO 5 8 3.3 14.6 100.0 . 194 77.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 57 Missing cases 194 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT2_A VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 .3 1.2 1.2 UNO 1 21 8.4 29.5 30.7 DOS 2 21 8.3 29.1 59.8 TRES 3 17 6.6 23.1 82.9 CUATRO 4 2 .7 2.4 85.3 CINCO 5 11 4.2 14.7 100.0 . 179 71.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 72 Missing cases 179 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PVOT3_A VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 3 1.2 3.6 3.6 UNO 1 23 9.3 27.9 31.5 DOS 2 18 7.3 22.0 53.5 TRES 3 19 7.6 22.9 76.4 CUATRO 4 1 .3 1.0 77.4 CINCO 5 19 7.5 22.6 100.0 . 167 66.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 84 Missing cases 167 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4_A VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 2 .9 73.8 73.8 UNO 1 1 .3 26.2 100.0 . 248 98.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 248 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT5_A VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 2 .9 75.8 75.8 UNO 1 1 .3 24.2 100.0 . 248 98.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 248 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PVOT6_A VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 .3 4.2 4.2 UNO 1 12 4.7 58.7 62.9 DOS 2 4 1.7 20.9 83.8 TRES 3 2 .6 8.0 91.8 CUATRO 4 2 .6 8.2 100.0 . 231 92.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 20 Missing cases 231 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7_A VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 .3 10.0 10.0 UNO 1 4 1.5 43.6 53.5 TRES 3 1 .3 8.9 62.5 CUATRO 4 1 .5 14.8 77.2 CINCO 5 2 .8 22.8 100.0 . 243 96.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 8 Missing cases 243 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT8_A VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 4 1.5 100.0 100.0 . 247 98.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 247 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PVOT9_A VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 2 .9 75.8 75.8 CINCO 5 1 .3 24.2 100.0 . 248 98.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 248 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10_A VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 2 .9 39.7 39.7 UNO 1 3 1.1 46.2 85.9 DOS 2 1 .3 14.1 100.0 . 245 97.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6 Missing cases 245 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT11_A VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 2 .9 26.2 26.2 UNO 1 2 .6 17.6 43.9 TRES 3 1 .3 8.4 52.2 CUATRO 4 2 .9 24.4 76.6 CINCO 5 2 .8 23.4 100.0 . 242 96.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 9 Missing cases 242 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PVOT12_A VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 .3 6.8 6.8 UNO 1 1 .5 10.1 17.0 DOS 2 2 .6 13.0 30.0 CINCO 5 9 3.4 70.0 100.0 . 239 95.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 12 Missing cases 239 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13_A VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 2 .9 15.4 15.4 UNO 1 2 .6 9.9 25.3 CINCO 5 11 4.6 74.7 100.0 . 236 93.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 15 Missing cases 236 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT1_B VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 4 1.6 8.3 8.3 UNO 1 23 9.0 45.6 53.9 DOS 2 7 2.9 14.7 68.6 TRES 3 4 1.8 8.9 77.5 CINCO 5 11 4.5 22.5 100.0 . 201 80.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 50 Missing cases 201 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PVOT2_B VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 4 1.4 4.9 4.9 UNO 1 23 9.1 31.5 36.4 DOS 2 14 5.6 19.5 55.9 TRES 3 12 4.6 16.1 72.0 CUATRO 4 4 1.6 5.5 77.6 CINCO 5 16 6.5 22.4 100.0 . 179 71.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 72 Missing cases 179 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT3_B VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 2 .8 3.1 3.1 UNO 1 21 8.2 32.3 35.4 DOS 2 17 6.6 25.9 61.4 TRES 3 14 5.7 22.5 83.8 CUATRO 4 1 .5 1.8 85.7 CINCO 5 9 3.7 14.3 100.0 . 187 74.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 64 Missing cases 187 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4_B VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 1.0 76.8 76.8 DOS 2 1 .3 23.2 100.0 . 248 98.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 248 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PVOT5_B VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .5 100.0 100.0 . 250 99.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 250 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT6_B VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 9 3.4 60.4 60.4 DOS 2 1 .5 8.7 69.1 TRES 3 2 1.0 16.9 86.0 CINCO 5 2 .8 14.0 100.0 . 237 94.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 14 Missing cases 237 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7_B VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DOS 2 1 .3 100.0 100.0 . 250 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 250 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PVOT8_B VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 251 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 251 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT9_B VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 .5 100.0 100.0 . 250 99.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 250 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10_B VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .3 100.0 100.0 . 250 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 250 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PVOT11_B VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .3 13.7 13.7 DOS 2 2 .7 27.3 41.0 CINCO 5 4 1.4 59.0 100.0 . 245 97.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6 Missing cases 245 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT12_B VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 9 3.5 100.0 100.0 . 242 96.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 9 Missing cases 242 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13_B VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DOS 2 1 .5 12.5 12.5 CINCO 5 9 3.5 87.5 100.0 . 241 96.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 10 Missing cases 241 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PVOT1 VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 157 62.5 62.5 62.5 UNO 1 56 22.5 22.5 84.9 DOS 2 12 4.7 4.7 89.6 TRES 3 7 2.6 2.6 92.2 CINCO 5 19 7.8 7.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT2 VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 111 44.4 44.4 44.4 UNO 1 44 17.5 17.5 61.9 DOS 2 35 13.9 13.9 75.8 TRES 3 28 11.3 11.3 87.1 CUATRO 4 6 2.3 2.3 89.3 CINCO 5 27 10.7 10.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT3 VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 108 43.1 43.1 43.1 UNO 1 44 17.5 17.5 60.7 DOS 2 35 14.0 14.0 74.6 TRES 3 34 13.4 13.4 88.0 CUATRO 4 2 .8 .8 88.8 CINCO 5 28 11.2 11.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PVOT4 VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 247 98.4 98.4 98.4 UNO 1 3 1.3 1.3 99.7 DOS 2 1 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT5 VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 249 99.2 99.2 99.2 UNO 1 2 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT6 VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 218 86.7 86.7 86.7 UNO 1 20 8.1 8.1 94.8 DOS 2 5 2.2 2.2 97.0 TRES 3 4 1.6 1.6 98.6 CUATRO 4 2 .6 .6 99.2 CINCO 5 2 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 32 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PVOT7 VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 243 96.6 96.6 96.6 UNO 1 4 1.5 1.5 98.1 DOS 2 1 .3 .3 98.4 TRES 3 1 .3 .3 98.7 CUATRO 4 1 .5 .5 99.2 CINCO 5 2 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT8 VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 251 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT9 VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 250 99.7 99.7 99.7 CINCO 5 1 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 33 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PVOT10 VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 247 98.2 98.2 98.2 UNO 1 4 1.4 1.4 99.7 DOS 2 1 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT11 VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 238 94.9 94.9 94.9 UNO 1 2 1.0 1.0 95.9 DOS 2 2 .7 .7 96.5 TRES 3 1 .3 .3 96.8 CUATRO 4 2 .9 .9 97.7 CINCO 5 6 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT12 VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 231 92.0 92.0 92.0 UNO 1 1 .5 .5 92.5 DOS 2 2 .6 .6 93.1 CINCO 5 17 6.9 6.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 34 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PVOT13 VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 228 90.8 90.8 90.8 UNO 1 2 .6 .6 91.4 DOS 2 1 .5 .5 91.9 CINCO 5 20 8.1 8.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 81 32.1 32.4 32.4 CCS del PRD 2 32 12.6 12.7 45.1 DFC del PAN 3 75 30.0 30.3 75.4 Otro 4 2 .7 .7 76.1 Por ninguno 5 15 6.0 6.0 82.1 No sabe 6 17 6.7 6.8 88.9 No contestó 7 28 11.0 11.1 100.0 0 2 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 249 Missing cases 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 35 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE PELE_A SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA A Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 38 15.3 29.2 29.2 CCS del PRD 2 7 2.9 5.6 34.8 DFC del PAN 3 44 17.4 33.2 67.9 Otro 4 2 .7 1.3 69.2 Por ninguno 5 13 5.0 9.5 78.7 No sabe 6 8 3.4 6.4 85.2 No contestó 7 20 7.8 14.8 100.0 . 119 47.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 132 Missing cases 119 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE_B SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA B Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 42 16.8 36.1 36.1 CCS del PRD 2 24 9.7 20.7 56.8 DFC del PAN 3 32 12.6 27.0 83.8 Por ninguno 5 2 1.0 2.1 85.9 No sabe 6 8 3.3 7.1 93.1 No contestó 7 8 3.2 6.9 100.0 . 134 53.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 117 Missing cases 134 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 117 46.5 46.5 46.5 femenino 2 134 53.5 53.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 36 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 72 28.6 28.6 28.6 26-40 2 94 37.6 37.6 66.2 41-60 3 59 23.5 23.5 89.7 61 + 4 26 10.3 10.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INST Institución donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 119 47.4 47.4 47.4 gob fed 2 26 10.2 10.2 57.6 paraestatal 3 6 2.6 2.6 60.2 emp priv 4 67 26.6 26.6 86.8 negocio prop 5 15 5.9 5.9 92.7 independiente 6 18 7.3 7.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 68 27.1 57.2 57.2 estudiante 2 28 11.1 23.4 80.6 jubilado 3 11 4.5 9.5 90.1 desemp 4 8 3.1 6.5 96.6 otro 5 4 1.6 3.4 100.0 0 132 52.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 119 Missing cases 132 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 37 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE ACTIV Rama de actividad económica Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent industria 2 14 5.7 10.9 10.9 comercio 3 28 11.3 21.5 32.4 construc 4 2 .9 1.7 34.2 educación 5 8 3.3 6.2 40.3 otros servs 6 79 31.4 59.7 100.0 0 119 47.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 132 Missing cases 119 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUESTO Que puesto ocupa en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario, Patron o 1 12 4.8 9.2 9.2 Directivo o Func de 2 9 3.5 6.7 15.9 Contratista o trabaj 3 19 7.5 14.3 30.2 Profesionista Indepe 4 5 1.8 3.5 33.7 Emplea, trabaj, Obre 5 87 34.5 65.6 99.3 trabajador sin pago 6 1 .3 .7 100.0 0 119 47.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 132 Missing cases 119 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 38 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1 .3 .3 .3 ninguno 1 3 1.4 1.4 1.7 prim inc 2 17 6.8 6.8 8.5 prim comp 3 30 11.9 11.9 20.4 sec incom 4 9 3.5 3.5 24.0 sec comp 5 49 19.5 19.5 43.5 prep incom 6 19 7.6 7.6 51.1 prep comp 7 49 19.7 19.7 70.8 univ incom 8 27 10.9 10.9 81.6 univ comp + 9 46 18.4 18.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 12 4.7 4.7 4.7 1-3 sm 2 49 19.4 19.5 24.2 3-5 sm 3 49 19.7 19.8 44.0 5-7 sm 4 12 4.9 4.9 49.0 7-10 5 23 9.0 9.1 58.0 10 + SM 6 57 22.9 23.0 81.0 7 47 18.9 19.0 100.0 . 1 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 251 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 250 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 39 ROLLOVER (79) DF 14/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/14/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLBDF.FRE This procedure was completed at 13:31:50 End of Include file.