The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 104 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 7047 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 881 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1 SITUACION DEL PAIS MEJOR? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 23 22.4 22.7 22.7 Igual (voluntario) 2 17 16.0 16.2 38.9 Peor 3 61 58.4 59.3 98.2 No sabe 4 2 1.8 1.8 100.0 . 2 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 103 Missing cases 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 SATISFECHO CON EL NIVEL DE VIDA ACTUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 49 46.5 46.5 46.5 Si en parte 2 10 10.0 10.0 56.5 No 3 46 43.5 43.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 6 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE P3 CANDIDATO INSPIRA MAS CONFIANZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas 1 14 13.4 13.4 13.4 Ernesto Zedillo 2 38 36.1 36.1 49.5 Diego Fdez. de Ceval 3 28 26.9 26.9 76.4 Ninguno 4 13 12.9 12.9 89.2 No sabe 5 7 6.6 6.6 95.9 No contestó 6 4 4.1 4.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4 PRECIOS DE COMPRA HABITALES MAS ALTOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Son más altos 1 77 73.3 73.3 73.3 No han cambiado 2 22 21.1 21.1 94.4 Son más bajos 3 3 3.3 3.3 97.7 No sabe 4 2 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 SIT ECONOMICA PERSONAL MEJOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 48 45.6 45.6 45.6 Igual (voluntario) 2 5 5.1 5.1 50.6 Peor 3 25 23.5 23.5 74.2 No sabe 4 26 24.6 24.6 98.8 No contestó 5 1 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE P6 QUIEN GUSTARIA FUERA PROXIMO PTE REP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas 1 14 13.2 13.2 13.2 Ernesto Zedillo 2 39 37.1 37.1 50.3 Diego Fdez. de Ceval 3 29 27.9 27.9 78.2 Otro 4 2 2.3 2.3 80.5 No sabe 5 8 8.0 8.0 88.5 No contestó 6 12 11.5 11.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7 COMO CONSID SIT ECONOM ACTUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 38 36.1 36.1 36.1 Igual (voluntario) 2 31 29.3 29.3 65.4 Peor 3 34 32.5 32.5 97.9 No sabe 4 2 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8 ACUERDO FORMA DE GOBERNAR PRESIDENTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent De acuerdo 1 45 43.1 43.1 43.1 De acuerdo en parte 2 21 20.5 20.5 63.5 En desacuerdo 3 35 33.2 33.2 96.7 No sabe 4 1 1.1 1.1 97.9 No contestó 5 2 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PATR1 Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 5 4.7 4.7 4.7 Zedillo 2 28 26.9 26.9 31.6 Cevallos 3 36 34.7 34.7 66.3 Ninguno 4 6 5.5 5.5 71.8 NS-NC 5 30 28.2 28.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2 mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 19 18.6 18.6 18.6 Zedillo 2 38 36.4 36.4 55.0 Cevallos 3 27 25.9 25.9 80.9 Ninguno 4 6 5.5 5.5 86.3 NS-NC 5 14 13.7 13.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR3 Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 10 10.0 10.0 10.0 Zedillo 2 34 32.5 32.5 42.6 Cevallos 3 45 43.1 43.1 85.7 Ninguno 4 5 5.1 5.1 90.8 NS-NC 5 10 9.2 9.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PATR4 Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 25 23.7 23.7 23.7 Zedillo 2 35 33.2 33.2 56.9 Cevallos 3 21 20.1 20.1 77.0 Ninguno 4 9 9.0 9.0 86.0 NS-NC 5 15 14.0 14.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR5 Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 13 12.0 12.0 12.0 Zedillo 2 43 41.0 41.0 53.0 Cevallos 3 29 27.6 27.6 80.6 Ninguno 4 5 4.4 4.4 85.0 NS-NC 5 16 15.0 15.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6 Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 8 7.4 7.4 7.4 Zedillo 2 27 25.4 25.4 32.9 Cevallos 3 23 22.0 22.0 54.9 Ninguno 4 10 9.8 9.8 64.7 NS-NC 5 37 35.3 35.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PATR7 MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 4 4.1 4.1 4.1 Zedillo 2 42 40.1 40.1 44.2 Cevallos 3 39 37.6 37.6 81.8 Ninguno 4 9 8.6 8.6 90.4 NS-NC 5 10 9.6 9.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8 PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 15 14.3 14.3 14.3 Zedillo 2 31 29.8 29.8 44.1 Cevallos 3 20 19.1 19.1 63.2 Ninguno 4 17 15.9 15.9 79.1 NS-NC 5 22 20.9 20.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR9 Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 14 13.4 13.4 13.4 Zedillo 2 30 29.0 29.0 42.4 Cevallos 3 30 28.4 28.4 70.8 Ninguno 4 11 10.8 10.8 81.6 NS-NC 5 19 18.4 18.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PATR1_A Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 2 2.0 3.9 3.9 Zedillo 2 17 16.2 31.7 35.6 Cevallos 3 16 15.7 30.7 66.3 Ninguno 4 3 3.2 6.3 72.7 NS-NC 5 15 14.0 27.3 100.0 . 51 48.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 54 Missing cases 51 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2_A mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 7 6.8 13.4 13.4 Zedillo 2 22 20.8 40.6 54.0 Cevallos 3 15 14.1 27.6 81.6 Ninguno 4 3 2.7 5.3 86.9 NS-NC 5 7 6.7 13.1 100.0 . 51 48.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 54 Missing cases 51 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PATR3_A Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 4 3.5 6.8 6.8 Zedillo 2 24 22.7 44.4 51.2 Cevallos 3 17 16.4 32.2 83.4 Ninguno 4 5 5.1 10.0 93.4 NS-NC 5 4 3.4 6.6 100.0 . 51 48.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 54 Missing cases 51 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR4_A Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 11 10.5 20.5 20.5 Zedillo 2 18 17.5 34.2 54.7 Cevallos 3 13 12.3 24.0 78.7 Ninguno 4 6 6.0 11.8 90.5 NS-NC 5 5 4.9 9.5 100.0 . 51 48.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 54 Missing cases 51 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PATR5_A Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 3 2.7 5.3 5.3 Zedillo 2 26 25.1 49.1 54.4 Cevallos 3 13 12.3 24.0 78.4 Ninguno 4 3 2.5 5.0 83.3 NS-NC 5 9 8.5 16.7 100.0 . 51 48.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 54 Missing cases 51 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6_A Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 2 1.5 2.8 2.8 Zedillo 2 13 12.2 24.0 26.8 Cevallos 3 9 8.4 16.5 43.3 Ninguno 4 7 6.9 13.4 56.7 NS-NC 5 23 22.1 43.3 100.0 . 51 48.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 54 Missing cases 51 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PATR7_A MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 1 .7 1.4 1.4 Zedillo 2 25 24.0 47.0 48.5 Cevallos 3 19 17.7 34.7 83.1 Ninguno 4 7 6.7 13.1 96.3 NS-NC 5 2 1.9 3.7 100.0 . 51 48.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 54 Missing cases 51 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8_A PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 5 5.0 9.9 9.9 Zedillo 2 19 17.9 35.0 44.9 Cevallos 3 10 9.3 18.1 63.0 Ninguno 4 10 9.2 18.0 81.0 NS-NC 5 10 9.7 19.0 100.0 . 51 48.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 54 Missing cases 51 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PATR9_A Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 5 4.9 9.5 9.5 Zedillo 2 17 16.6 32.5 42.0 Cevallos 3 14 13.0 25.4 67.4 Ninguno 4 6 6.0 11.7 79.1 NS-NC 5 11 10.7 20.9 100.0 . 51 48.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 54 Missing cases 51 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR1_B Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 3 2.7 5.6 5.6 Zedillo 2 11 10.7 21.8 27.4 Cevallos 3 20 19.0 38.9 66.3 Ninguno 4 2 2.3 4.7 71.0 NS-NC 5 15 14.2 29.0 100.0 . 54 51.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 51 Missing cases 54 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PATR2_B mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 12 11.7 24.0 24.0 Zedillo 2 16 15.6 32.0 56.0 Cevallos 3 12 11.8 24.1 80.1 Ninguno 4 3 2.7 5.6 85.7 NS-NC 5 7 7.0 14.3 100.0 . 54 51.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 51 Missing cases 54 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR3_B Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 7 6.5 13.4 13.4 Zedillo 2 10 9.8 20.1 33.5 Cevallos 3 28 26.7 54.6 88.1 NS-NC 5 6 5.8 11.9 100.0 . 54 51.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 51 Missing cases 54 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR4_B Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 14 13.3 27.2 27.2 Zedillo 2 16 15.7 32.1 59.2 Cevallos 3 8 7.8 15.9 75.2 Ninguno 4 3 3.0 6.1 81.3 NS-NC 5 10 9.1 18.7 100.0 . 54 51.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 51 Missing cases 54 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PATR5_B Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 10 9.2 18.9 18.9 Zedillo 2 17 15.9 32.6 51.5 Cevallos 3 16 15.3 31.4 82.9 Ninguno 4 2 1.8 3.8 86.6 NS-NC 5 7 6.5 13.4 100.0 . 54 51.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 51 Missing cases 54 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6_B Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 6 6.0 12.3 12.3 Zedillo 2 14 13.2 26.9 39.2 Cevallos 3 14 13.6 27.9 67.0 Ninguno 4 3 2.9 6.0 73.1 NS-NC 5 14 13.2 26.9 100.0 . 54 51.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 51 Missing cases 54 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PATR7_B MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 4 3.4 7.0 7.0 Zedillo 2 17 16.0 32.8 39.8 Cevallos 3 21 19.9 40.7 80.5 Ninguno 4 2 1.8 3.8 84.3 NS-NC 5 8 7.7 15.7 100.0 . 54 51.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 51 Missing cases 54 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8_B PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 10 9.2 18.9 18.9 Zedillo 2 12 11.9 24.3 43.3 Cevallos 3 10 9.9 20.2 63.5 Ninguno 4 7 6.7 13.7 77.2 NS-NC 5 12 11.1 22.8 100.0 . 54 51.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 51 Missing cases 54 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PATR9_B Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 9 8.5 17.5 17.5 Zedillo 2 13 12.4 25.4 42.9 Cevallos 3 16 15.4 31.5 74.5 Ninguno 4 5 4.8 9.8 84.3 NS-NC 5 8 7.7 15.7 100.0 . 54 51.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 51 Missing cases 54 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT1_A VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 5 5.2 20.6 20.6 UNO 1 11 10.6 42.4 63.0 DOS 2 7 6.6 26.2 89.2 TRES 3 3 2.7 10.8 100.0 . 79 75.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 26 Missing cases 79 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PVOT2_A VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 5 5.2 13.7 13.7 UNO 1 10 9.6 25.6 39.3 DOS 2 7 6.9 18.3 57.6 TRES 3 8 7.3 19.4 77.0 CUATRO 4 2 1.6 4.3 81.3 CINCO 5 7 7.0 18.7 100.0 . 65 62.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 39 Missing cases 65 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT3_A VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 4 3.7 10.5 10.5 UNO 1 12 11.7 33.1 43.5 DOS 2 7 7.0 19.7 63.3 TRES 3 7 6.4 18.0 81.3 CUATRO 4 1 .7 2.0 83.3 CINCO 5 6 5.9 16.7 100.0 . 68 64.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 37 Missing cases 68 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4_A VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 9 8.4 92.0 92.0 UNO 1 1 .7 8.0 100.0 . 95 90.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 10 Missing cases 95 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PVOT5_A VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 9 8.4 92.0 92.0 UNO 1 1 .7 8.0 100.0 . 95 90.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 10 Missing cases 95 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT6_A VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 4 4.2 29.1 29.1 UNO 1 8 7.8 53.5 82.6 DOS 2 2 1.8 12.5 95.1 CUATRO 4 1 .7 4.9 100.0 . 90 85.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 15 Missing cases 90 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7_A VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 8 7.3 80.2 80.2 UNO 1 2 1.8 19.8 100.0 . 95 90.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 10 Missing cases 95 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PVOT8_A VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 9 8.4 100.0 100.0 . 96 91.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 9 Missing cases 96 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT9_A VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 8 7.7 91.3 91.3 UNO 1 1 .7 8.7 100.0 . 96 91.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 9 Missing cases 96 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10_A VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 9 8.4 81.8 81.8 UNO 1 2 1.9 18.2 100.0 . 94 89.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 11 Missing cases 94 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PVOT11_A VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 9 8.4 78.0 78.0 UNO 1 1 .9 8.3 86.3 DOS 2 2 1.5 13.7 100.0 . 94 89.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 11 Missing cases 94 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT12_A VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 9 8.4 78.3 78.3 CINCO 5 2 2.3 21.7 100.0 . 94 89.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 11 Missing cases 94 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13_A VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 8 7.6 61.2 61.2 CINCO 5 5 4.8 38.8 100.0 . 92 87.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 13 Missing cases 92 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PVOT1_B VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 3 2.9 13.9 13.9 UNO 1 6 5.9 28.6 42.5 DOS 2 4 3.5 17.0 59.5 TRES 3 2 2.4 11.5 70.9 CUATRO 4 1 1.1 5.5 76.5 CINCO 5 5 4.8 23.5 100.0 . 83 79.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 22 Missing cases 83 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT2_B VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 3 2.7 14.2 14.2 DOS 2 2 2.3 11.9 26.1 TRES 3 10 9.2 47.6 73.6 CINCO 5 5 5.1 26.4 100.0 . 85 80.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 20 Missing cases 85 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PVOT3_B VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 2 1.5 5.5 5.5 UNO 1 4 4.1 15.5 21.0 DOS 2 9 9.0 34.0 55.0 TRES 3 3 2.7 10.1 65.0 CINCO 5 10 9.3 35.0 100.0 . 77 73.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 28 Missing cases 77 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4_B VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .7 100.0 100.0 . 104 99.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 104 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT5_B VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .7 100.0 100.0 . 104 99.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 104 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PVOT6_B VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 1.8 25.0 25.0 DOS 2 4 4.0 53.7 78.7 TRES 3 1 .9 12.1 90.8 CINCO 5 1 .7 9.2 100.0 . 97 92.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 8 Missing cases 97 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7_B VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 105 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 105 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT8_B VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 105 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 105 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PVOT9_B VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 105 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 105 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10_B VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 105 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 105 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT11_B VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 2 1.5 38.8 38.8 UNO 1 1 .9 23.7 62.5 TRES 3 1 .7 18.7 81.3 CINCO 5 1 .7 18.7 100.0 . 101 96.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 101 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PVOT12_B VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 .7 10.4 10.4 CINCO 5 6 6.1 89.6 100.0 . 98 93.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 7 Missing cases 98 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13_B VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 1 .9 100.0 100.0 . 104 99.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 104 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT1 VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 65 62.4 62.4 62.4 UNO 1 17 16.5 16.5 78.9 DOS 2 11 10.1 10.1 88.9 TRES 3 5 5.1 5.1 94.0 CUATRO 4 1 1.1 1.1 95.2 CINCO 5 5 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PVOT2 VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 51 48.3 48.3 48.3 UNO 1 13 12.4 12.4 60.6 DOS 2 10 9.2 9.2 69.8 TRES 3 17 16.5 16.5 86.3 CUATRO 4 2 1.6 1.6 87.9 CINCO 5 13 12.1 12.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT3 VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 45 43.2 43.2 43.2 UNO 1 17 15.8 15.8 59.0 DOS 2 17 16.0 16.0 75.0 TRES 3 9 9.0 9.0 84.1 CUATRO 4 1 .7 .7 84.8 CINCO 5 16 15.2 15.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4 VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 103 98.6 98.6 98.6 UNO 1 2 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PVOT5 VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 103 98.6 98.6 98.6 UNO 1 2 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT6 VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 86 82.3 82.3 82.3 UNO 1 10 9.6 9.6 91.9 DOS 2 6 5.8 5.8 97.7 TRES 3 1 .9 .9 98.6 CUATRO 4 1 .7 .7 99.3 CINCO 5 1 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7 VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 103 98.2 98.2 98.2 UNO 1 2 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PVOT8 VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 105 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT9 VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 104 99.3 99.3 99.3 UNO 1 1 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10 VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 103 98.1 98.1 98.1 UNO 1 2 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 32 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PVOT11 VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 100 95.3 95.3 95.3 UNO 1 2 1.8 1.8 97.1 DOS 2 2 1.5 1.5 98.6 TRES 3 1 .7 .7 99.3 CINCO 5 1 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT12 VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 96 91.6 91.6 91.6 CINCO 5 9 8.4 8.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13 VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 99 94.3 94.3 94.3 CINCO 5 6 5.7 5.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 33 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PELE SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 36 34.6 34.6 34.6 CCS del PRD 2 14 13.6 13.6 48.3 DFC del PAN 3 30 28.5 28.5 76.8 Otro 4 1 .7 .7 77.5 Por ninguno 5 1 1.4 1.4 78.9 No sabe 6 10 9.8 9.8 88.7 No contestó 7 12 11.3 11.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE_A SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA A Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 19 17.8 34.9 34.9 CCS del PRD 2 4 3.8 7.4 42.3 DFC del PAN 3 13 12.6 24.7 67.0 Por ninguno 5 1 .7 1.4 68.4 No sabe 6 6 6.0 11.7 80.1 No contestó 7 11 10.2 19.9 100.0 . 51 48.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 54 Missing cases 51 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 34 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE PELE_B SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA B Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 18 16.8 34.4 34.4 CCS del PRD 2 10 9.8 20.1 54.5 DFC del PAN 3 17 15.9 32.4 86.9 Otro 4 1 .7 1.4 88.4 Por ninguno 5 1 .7 1.4 89.8 No sabe 6 4 3.8 7.9 97.7 No contestó 7 1 1.1 2.3 100.0 . 54 51.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 51 Missing cases 54 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 47 45.0 45.0 45.0 femenino 2 57 54.0 54.0 99.0 3 1 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 35 33.4 33.4 33.4 26-40 2 38 36.0 36.0 69.4 41-60 3 26 24.8 24.8 94.3 61 + 4 6 5.7 5.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 35 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE INST Institución donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 55 52.1 52.1 52.1 gob fed 2 15 14.8 14.8 66.9 paraestatal 3 2 1.4 1.4 68.4 emp priv 4 16 15.1 15.1 83.5 negocio prop 5 5 5.1 5.1 88.6 independiente 6 12 11.4 11.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 27 25.6 49.1 49.1 estudiante 2 19 18.4 35.2 84.4 jubilado 3 5 4.9 9.5 93.9 desemp 4 3 2.5 4.7 98.6 otro 5 1 .7 1.4 100.0 0 50 47.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 55 Missing cases 50 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 36 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE ACTIV Rama de actividad económica Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent agric 1 1 .7 1.5 1.5 industria 2 4 4.0 8.3 9.8 comercio 3 10 9.3 19.5 29.3 construc 4 1 .7 1.5 30.8 educación 5 9 8.3 17.4 48.2 otros servs 6 26 24.8 51.8 100.0 0 55 52.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 50 Missing cases 55 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUESTO Que puesto ocupa en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario, Patron o 1 1 .9 1.9 1.9 Directivo o Func de 2 3 3.1 6.5 8.4 Contratista o trabaj 3 14 13.8 28.8 37.2 Profesionista Indepe 4 2 1.6 3.4 40.6 Emplea, trabaj, Obre 5 30 28.4 59.4 100.0 0 55 52.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 50 Missing cases 55 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 37 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 1 .7 .7 .7 prim inc 2 3 2.8 2.8 3.5 prim comp 3 12 11.9 11.9 15.4 sec incom 4 1 .7 .7 16.1 sec comp 5 23 22.1 22.1 38.2 prep incom 6 9 8.3 8.3 46.5 prep comp 7 18 17.3 17.3 63.8 univ incom 8 18 16.8 16.8 80.6 univ comp + 9 20 19.4 19.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 4 3.7 3.7 3.7 1-3 sm 2 22 21.0 21.0 24.7 3-5 sm 3 19 18.4 18.4 43.0 5-7 sm 4 9 8.2 8.2 51.2 7-10 5 7 6.2 6.2 57.4 10 + SM 6 21 19.8 19.8 77.2 7 24 22.8 22.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 38 ROLLOVER (80) DF 15/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/16/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLDDF.FRE This procedure was completed at 21:48:33 End of Include file.