The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 328 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 7326 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 916 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1 SITUACION DEL PAIS MEJOR? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 71 21.6 21.6 21.6 Igual (voluntario) 2 39 11.8 11.8 33.4 Peor 3 205 62.3 62.3 95.7 No sabe 4 11 3.4 3.4 99.1 No contestó 5 3 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 329 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 SATISFECHO CON EL NIVEL DE VIDA ACTUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 151 46.0 46.4 46.4 Si en parte 2 38 11.5 11.6 57.9 No 3 135 41.2 41.5 99.4 No contestó 4 2 .6 .6 100.0 . 2 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 326 Missing cases 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 6 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE P3 CANDIDATO INSPIRA MAS CONFIANZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas 1 20 6.1 6.1 6.1 Ernesto Zedillo 2 152 46.2 46.2 52.3 Diego Fdez. de Ceval 3 88 26.9 26.9 79.1 Ninguno 4 36 11.1 11.1 90.2 No sabe 5 23 7.1 7.1 97.3 No contestó 6 9 2.7 2.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 329 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4 PRECIOS DE COMPRA HABITALES MAS ALTOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Son más altos 1 244 74.2 74.2 74.2 No han cambiado 2 63 19.2 19.2 93.3 Son más bajos 3 20 6.1 6.1 99.5 No sabe 4 2 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 329 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 SIT ECONOMICA PERSONAL MEJOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 147 44.8 44.9 44.9 Igual (voluntario) 2 26 7.9 7.9 52.8 Peor 3 74 22.4 22.5 75.3 No sabe 4 75 22.8 22.9 98.2 No contestó 5 6 1.8 1.8 100.0 . 1 .4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 327 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE P6 QUIEN GUSTARIA FUERA PROXIMO PTE REP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas 1 18 5.6 5.6 5.6 Ernesto Zedillo 2 136 41.4 41.4 46.9 Diego Fdez. de Ceval 3 97 29.4 29.4 76.3 Otro 4 10 2.9 2.9 79.3 No sabe 5 51 15.5 15.5 94.8 No contestó 6 17 5.2 5.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 329 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7 COMO CONSID SIT ECONOM ACTUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 99 30.0 30.0 30.0 Igual (voluntario) 2 87 26.5 26.5 56.5 Peor 3 133 40.3 40.3 96.8 No sabe 4 4 1.1 1.1 98.0 No contestó 5 7 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 329 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8 ACUERDO FORMA DE GOBERNAR PRESIDENTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent De acuerdo 1 182 55.3 55.5 55.5 De acuerdo en parte 2 48 14.7 14.7 70.2 En desacuerdo 3 73 22.2 22.2 92.5 No sabe 4 10 3.0 3.1 95.5 No contestó 5 15 4.5 4.5 100.0 . 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 328 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PATR1 Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 21 6.4 6.4 6.4 Zedillo 2 108 32.8 32.8 39.2 Cevallos 3 133 40.6 40.6 79.8 Ninguno 4 12 3.7 3.7 83.5 NS-NC 5 54 16.5 16.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 329 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2 mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 39 11.9 11.9 11.9 Zedillo 2 139 42.3 42.3 54.3 Cevallos 3 89 26.9 26.9 81.2 Ninguno 4 24 7.2 7.2 88.4 NS-NC 5 38 11.6 11.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 329 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR3 Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 20 6.1 6.1 6.1 Zedillo 2 87 26.5 26.5 32.6 Cevallos 3 175 53.4 53.4 86.0 Ninguno 4 10 3.0 3.0 89.1 NS-NC 5 36 10.9 10.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 329 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PATR4 Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 59 18.0 18.0 18.0 Zedillo 2 125 38.0 38.0 56.0 Cevallos 3 85 26.0 26.0 82.0 Ninguno 4 21 6.4 6.4 88.4 NS-NC 5 38 11.6 11.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 329 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR5 Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 12 3.6 3.6 3.6 Zedillo 2 150 45.6 45.6 49.2 Cevallos 3 97 29.6 29.6 78.7 Ninguno 4 29 8.8 8.8 87.6 NS-NC 5 41 12.4 12.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 329 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6 Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 18 5.3 5.3 5.3 Zedillo 2 79 24.0 24.0 29.4 Cevallos 3 83 25.3 25.3 54.6 Ninguno 4 44 13.3 13.3 68.0 NS-NC 5 105 32.0 32.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 329 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PATR7 MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 18 5.6 5.6 5.6 Zedillo 2 139 42.2 42.2 47.9 Cevallos 3 116 35.3 35.3 83.1 Ninguno 4 20 6.0 6.0 89.1 NS-NC 5 36 10.9 10.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 329 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8 PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 16 5.0 5.0 5.0 Zedillo 2 114 34.8 34.8 39.7 Cevallos 3 64 19.5 19.5 59.3 Ninguno 4 60 18.2 18.2 77.5 NS-NC 5 74 22.5 22.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 329 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR9 Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 24 7.2 7.2 7.2 Zedillo 2 99 30.1 30.1 37.2 Cevallos 3 114 34.7 34.7 71.9 Ninguno 4 32 9.8 9.8 81.7 NS-NC 5 60 18.3 18.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 329 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PATR1_A Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 11 3.4 6.8 6.8 Zedillo 2 56 17.2 33.8 40.6 Cevallos 3 60 18.3 36.1 76.7 Ninguno 4 9 2.7 5.2 81.9 NS-NC 5 30 9.2 18.1 100.0 . 162 49.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 167 Missing cases 162 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2_A mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 19 5.9 11.6 11.6 Zedillo 2 76 23.0 45.3 56.9 Cevallos 3 47 14.3 28.2 85.1 Ninguno 4 11 3.2 6.3 91.4 NS-NC 5 14 4.4 8.6 100.0 . 162 49.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 167 Missing cases 162 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PATR3_A Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 10 3.0 6.0 6.0 Zedillo 2 51 15.6 30.8 36.8 Cevallos 3 84 25.6 50.4 87.1 Ninguno 4 5 1.5 2.9 90.0 NS-NC 5 17 5.1 10.0 100.0 . 162 49.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 167 Missing cases 162 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR4_A Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 29 8.8 17.4 17.4 Zedillo 2 70 21.3 41.9 59.3 Cevallos 3 39 11.7 23.1 82.4 Ninguno 4 13 3.9 7.6 90.0 NS-NC 5 17 5.1 10.0 100.0 . 162 49.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 167 Missing cases 162 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PATR5_A Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 4 1.2 2.4 2.4 Zedillo 2 77 23.3 45.9 48.3 Cevallos 3 44 13.4 26.3 74.7 Ninguno 4 16 4.9 9.6 84.2 NS-NC 5 26 8.0 15.8 100.0 . 162 49.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 167 Missing cases 162 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6_A Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 10 3.2 6.2 6.2 Zedillo 2 43 13.1 25.8 32.1 Cevallos 3 38 11.6 22.9 54.9 Ninguno 4 18 5.4 10.5 65.5 NS-NC 5 58 17.5 34.5 100.0 . 162 49.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 167 Missing cases 162 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PATR7_A MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 8 2.5 5.0 5.0 Zedillo 2 68 20.5 40.5 45.5 Cevallos 3 59 17.8 35.1 80.5 Ninguno 4 13 4.0 8.0 88.5 NS-NC 5 19 5.8 11.5 100.0 . 162 49.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 167 Missing cases 162 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8_A PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 6 1.8 3.6 3.6 Zedillo 2 62 18.9 37.2 40.7 Cevallos 3 30 9.3 18.2 59.0 Ninguno 4 31 9.4 18.5 77.5 NS-NC 5 38 11.4 22.5 100.0 . 162 49.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 167 Missing cases 162 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PATR9_A Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 12 3.8 7.4 7.4 Zedillo 2 56 17.2 33.8 41.2 Cevallos 3 50 15.1 29.7 70.9 Ninguno 4 19 5.6 11.1 82.0 NS-NC 5 30 9.2 18.0 100.0 . 162 49.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 167 Missing cases 162 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR1_B Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 10 3.0 6.0 6.0 Zedillo 2 51 15.6 31.7 37.7 Cevallos 3 73 22.3 45.3 83.0 Ninguno 4 3 1.0 2.0 85.1 NS-NC 5 24 7.3 14.9 100.0 . 167 50.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 162 Missing cases 167 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PATR2_B mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 20 6.1 12.3 12.3 Zedillo 2 63 19.3 39.2 51.6 Cevallos 3 41 12.6 25.6 77.2 Ninguno 4 13 4.0 8.1 85.3 NS-NC 5 24 7.2 14.7 100.0 . 167 50.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 162 Missing cases 167 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR3_B Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 10 3.1 6.2 6.2 Zedillo 2 36 10.9 22.1 28.3 Cevallos 3 91 27.8 56.6 84.9 Ninguno 4 5 1.6 3.2 88.1 NS-NC 5 19 5.9 11.9 100.0 . 167 50.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 162 Missing cases 167 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PATR4_B Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 30 9.2 18.6 18.6 Zedillo 2 55 16.7 34.0 52.6 Cevallos 3 47 14.3 29.0 81.6 Ninguno 4 8 2.5 5.1 86.7 NS-NC 5 22 6.5 13.3 100.0 . 167 50.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 162 Missing cases 167 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR5_B Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 8 2.4 4.8 4.8 Zedillo 2 73 22.3 45.2 50.1 Cevallos 3 53 16.2 32.9 83.0 Ninguno 4 13 4.0 8.1 91.0 NS-NC 5 15 4.4 9.0 100.0 . 167 50.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 162 Missing cases 167 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PATR6_B Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 7 2.2 4.4 4.4 Zedillo 2 36 10.9 22.1 26.6 Cevallos 3 45 13.7 27.8 54.3 Ninguno 4 26 8.0 16.2 70.6 NS-NC 5 48 14.5 29.4 100.0 . 167 50.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 162 Missing cases 167 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR7_B MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 10 3.1 6.2 6.2 Zedillo 2 71 21.7 44.1 50.3 Cevallos 3 57 17.4 35.4 85.8 Ninguno 4 6 2.0 4.0 89.8 NS-NC 5 17 5.0 10.2 100.0 . 167 50.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 162 Missing cases 167 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PATR8_B PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 10 3.1 6.4 6.4 Zedillo 2 52 15.9 32.3 38.7 Cevallos 3 34 10.3 20.9 59.6 Ninguno 4 29 8.8 17.9 77.5 NS-NC 5 36 11.1 22.5 100.0 . 167 50.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 162 Missing cases 167 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR9_B Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 11 3.4 6.9 6.9 Zedillo 2 42 12.9 26.2 33.2 Cevallos 3 64 19.6 39.8 72.9 Ninguno 4 14 4.1 8.4 81.3 NS-NC 5 30 9.2 18.7 100.0 . 167 50.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 162 Missing cases 167 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PVOT1_A VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 33 10.2 71.7 71.7 DOS 2 4 1.2 8.5 80.2 TRES 3 7 2.2 15.7 95.9 CINCO 5 2 .6 4.1 100.0 . 266 81.1 Missing CERO 0 16 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 47 Missing cases 282 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT2_A VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 20 6.2 17.3 17.3 DOS 2 25 7.7 21.5 38.8 TRES 3 21 6.5 18.2 57.0 CUATRO 4 8 2.5 7.0 64.0 CINCO 5 42 12.9 36.0 100.0 . 207 63.1 Missing CERO 0 4 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 118 Missing cases 211 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PVOT3_A VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 24 7.3 27.4 27.4 DOS 2 26 7.9 29.4 56.8 TRES 3 22 6.7 25.0 81.8 CUATRO 4 4 1.2 4.4 86.2 CINCO 5 12 3.7 13.8 100.0 . 240 73.0 Missing CERO 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 88 Missing cases 241 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4_A VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .3 100.0 100.0 . 328 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 328 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT5_A VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DOS 2 1 .3 100.0 100.0 . 328 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 328 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PVOT6_A VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 6 1.9 60.6 60.6 DOS 2 4 1.2 39.4 100.0 . 317 96.6 Missing CERO 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 10 Missing cases 318 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7_A VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 4 1.2 79.4 79.4 DOS 2 1 .3 20.6 100.0 . 324 98.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 5 Missing cases 324 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT8_A VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 328 99.7 Missing CERO 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 329 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PVOT9_A VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TRES 3 1 .3 100.0 100.0 . 328 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 328 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10_A VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 3 1.0 100.0 100.0 . 324 98.5 Missing CERO 0 2 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 325 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT11_A VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 .6 26.4 26.4 CUATRO 4 1 .3 11.8 38.2 CINCO 5 5 1.5 61.8 100.0 . 321 97.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 8 Missing cases 321 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PVOT12_A VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 .7 15.9 15.9 CINCO 5 12 3.6 84.1 100.0 . 314 95.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 14 Missing cases 314 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13_A VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 9 2.6 100.0 100.0 . 319 97.0 Missing CERO 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 9 Missing cases 320 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT1_B VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 24 7.2 53.9 53.9 DOS 2 8 2.5 18.8 72.7 TRES 3 3 .9 6.8 79.5 CINCO 5 9 2.7 20.5 100.0 . 280 85.2 Missing CERO 0 5 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 44 Missing cases 285 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PVOT2_B VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 18 5.6 19.7 19.7 DOS 2 18 5.3 18.9 38.6 TRES 3 21 6.5 22.9 61.5 CUATRO 4 4 1.3 4.5 66.1 CINCO 5 32 9.6 33.9 100.0 . 236 71.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 93 Missing cases 236 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT3_B VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 16 5.0 18.5 18.5 DOS 2 29 8.8 32.6 51.1 TRES 3 20 6.1 22.8 73.9 CUATRO 4 1 .3 1.0 74.8 CINCO 5 22 6.8 25.2 100.0 . 240 73.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 88 Missing cases 240 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4_B VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .3 100.0 100.0 . 326 99.3 Missing CERO 0 1 .4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 328 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PVOT5_B VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .3 49.6 49.6 CINCO 5 1 .3 50.4 100.0 . 327 99.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 327 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT6_B VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 3 .9 38.2 38.2 DOS 2 3 .9 38.5 76.7 TRES 3 1 .3 11.9 88.6 CINCO 5 1 .3 11.4 100.0 . 321 97.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 8 Missing cases 321 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7_B VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 5 1.6 57.9 57.9 DOS 2 2 .6 20.7 78.6 CINCO 5 2 .6 21.4 100.0 . 319 97.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 9 Missing cases 319 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PVOT8_B VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 329 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 329 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT9_B VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 329 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 329 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10_B VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 329 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 329 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PVOT11_B VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DOS 2 1 .3 10.0 10.0 CINCO 5 8 2.5 90.0 100.0 . 319 97.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 9 Missing cases 319 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT12_B VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DOS 2 1 .3 8.3 8.3 TRES 3 1 .3 8.7 17.0 CINCO 5 9 2.7 83.0 100.0 . 317 96.5 Missing CERO 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 11 Missing cases 318 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13_B VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .3 11.1 11.1 CINCO 5 8 2.4 88.9 100.0 . 318 96.8 Missing CERO 0 2 .6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 9 Missing cases 320 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PVOT1 VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 57 17.3 63.1 63.1 DOS 2 12 3.7 13.5 76.6 TRES 3 10 3.1 11.4 88.0 CINCO 5 11 3.3 12.0 100.0 CERO 0 238 72.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 90 Missing cases 238 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT2 VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 39 11.7 18.3 18.3 DOS 2 43 13.0 20.4 38.7 TRES 3 43 13.0 20.3 59.0 CUATRO 4 12 3.8 5.9 64.9 CINCO 5 74 22.5 35.1 100.0 CERO 0 118 35.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 210 Missing cases 118 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT3 VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 40 12.3 22.9 22.9 DOS 2 55 16.6 31.0 53.9 TRES 3 42 12.8 23.9 77.8 CUATRO 4 5 1.4 2.7 80.5 CINCO 5 34 10.5 19.5 100.0 CERO 0 152 46.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 176 Missing cases 152 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PVOT4 VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 .6 100.0 100.0 CERO 0 327 99.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 327 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT5 VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .3 34.4 34.4 DOS 2 1 .3 30.5 64.9 CINCO 5 1 .3 35.1 100.0 CERO 0 326 99.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 326 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT6 VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 9 2.8 51.1 51.1 DOS 2 7 2.1 39.0 90.1 TRES 3 1 .3 5.1 95.1 CINCO 5 1 .3 4.9 100.0 CERO 0 311 94.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 18 Missing cases 311 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PVOT7 VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 9 2.8 65.4 65.4 DOS 2 3 .9 20.7 86.0 CINCO 5 2 .6 14.0 100.0 CERO 0 314 95.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 14 Missing cases 314 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT8 VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 329 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 329 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT9 VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TRES 3 1 .3 100.0 100.0 CERO 0 328 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 328 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 32 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PVOT10 VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 3 1.0 100.0 100.0 CERO 0 325 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 325 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT11 VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 .6 12.1 12.1 DOS 2 1 .3 5.4 17.5 CUATRO 4 1 .3 5.4 23.0 CINCO 5 13 4.0 77.0 100.0 CERO 0 312 94.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 17 Missing cases 312 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT12 VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 .7 9.1 9.1 DOS 2 1 .3 3.5 12.6 TRES 3 1 .3 3.7 16.3 CINCO 5 21 6.3 83.7 100.0 CERO 0 304 92.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 25 Missing cases 304 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 33 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PVOT13 VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .3 5.6 5.6 CINCO 5 16 5.0 94.4 100.0 CERO 0 311 94.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 17 Missing cases 311 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 146 44.4 44.4 44.4 CCS del PRD 2 20 6.0 6.0 50.4 DFC del PAN 3 102 31.0 31.0 81.4 Otro 4 1 .3 .3 81.7 Por ninguno 5 19 5.7 5.7 87.4 No sabe 6 24 7.2 7.2 94.6 No contestó 7 18 5.4 5.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 329 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE_A SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA A Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 78 23.9 47.0 47.0 CCS del PRD 2 5 1.4 2.8 49.8 DFC del PAN 3 48 14.7 28.9 78.7 Por ninguno 5 10 2.9 5.8 84.5 No sabe 6 14 4.3 8.4 93.0 No contestó 7 12 3.6 7.0 100.0 . 162 49.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 167 Missing cases 162 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 34 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE PELE_B SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA B Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 67 20.5 41.7 41.7 CCS del PRD 2 15 4.6 9.3 51.0 DFC del PAN 3 53 16.3 33.1 84.1 Otro 4 1 .3 .6 84.7 Por ninguno 5 9 2.7 5.6 90.3 No sabe 6 10 2.9 6.0 96.3 No contestó 7 6 1.8 3.7 100.0 . 167 50.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 162 Missing cases 167 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 157 47.8 47.8 47.8 femenino 2 171 52.2 52.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 329 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 114 34.7 34.7 34.7 26-40 2 106 32.2 32.2 66.9 41-60 3 73 22.3 22.3 89.2 61 + 4 35 10.8 10.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 329 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 35 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE INST Institución donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 147 44.9 44.9 44.9 gob fed 2 33 10.1 10.1 54.9 paraestatal 3 7 2.3 2.3 57.2 emp priv 4 84 25.4 25.4 82.6 negocio prop 5 30 9.2 9.2 91.9 independiente 6 27 8.1 8.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 329 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 85 26.0 58.0 58.0 estudiante 2 42 12.9 28.8 86.8 jubilado 3 12 3.8 8.4 95.2 desemp 4 4 1.2 2.8 98.0 otro 5 3 .9 2.0 100.0 0 181 55.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 147 Missing cases 181 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 36 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE ACTIV Rama de actividad económica Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent agric 1 7 2.0 3.6 3.6 industria 2 17 5.2 9.5 13.1 comercio 3 41 12.5 22.7 35.8 construc 4 5 1.5 2.6 38.4 educación 5 21 6.3 11.5 49.9 otros servs 6 91 27.6 50.1 100.0 0 147 44.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 181 Missing cases 147 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUESTO Que puesto ocupa en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario, Patron o 1 9 2.9 5.2 5.2 Directivo o Func de 2 13 4.1 7.4 12.6 Contratista o trabaj 3 42 12.9 23.4 36.0 Profesionista Indepe 4 13 3.8 7.0 43.0 Emplea, trabaj, Obre 5 103 31.4 57.0 100.0 0 147 44.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 181 Missing cases 147 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 37 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 1 .4 .4 .4 prim inc 2 17 5.3 5.3 5.7 prim comp 3 44 13.5 13.5 19.2 sec incom 4 6 1.7 1.7 20.8 sec comp 5 67 20.5 20.5 41.4 prep incom 6 35 10.6 10.6 52.0 prep comp 7 55 16.8 16.8 68.8 univ incom 8 30 9.2 9.2 78.0 univ comp + 9 72 22.0 22.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 329 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 11 3.2 3.2 3.2 1-3 sm 2 77 23.3 23.4 26.6 3-5 sm 3 47 14.3 14.3 40.9 5-7 sm 4 27 8.3 8.3 49.2 7-10 5 29 9.0 9.0 58.2 10 + SM 6 65 19.7 19.8 78.0 7 72 21.9 22.0 100.0 . 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 329 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 328 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 38 ROLLOVER (31) NACIONAL 20/JUN/94 TELEFONICA 6/22/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROLJCONJ.FRE This procedure was completed at 21:08:51 End of Include file.