The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 96 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 7270 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 909 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1 SITUACION DEL PAIS MEJOR? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 23 23.6 23.6 23.6 Igual (voluntario) 2 20 21.0 21.0 44.7 Peor 3 52 54.1 54.1 98.7 No sabe 4 1 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 97 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 SATISFECHO CON EL NIVEL DE VIDA ACTUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 43 44.7 44.7 44.7 Si en parte 2 15 15.4 15.4 60.1 No 3 37 38.6 38.6 98.7 No contestó 4 1 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 97 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 6 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE P3 CANDIDATO INSPIRA MAS CONFIANZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas 1 10 10.4 10.4 10.4 Ernesto Zedillo 2 30 30.7 30.7 41.1 Diego Fdez. de Ceval 3 40 41.2 41.2 82.4 Ninguno 4 7 7.1 7.1 89.5 No sabe 5 5 5.2 5.2 94.7 No contestó 6 5 5.3 5.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 97 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4 PRECIOS DE COMPRA HABITALES MAS ALTOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Son más altos 1 71 73.2 73.2 73.2 No han cambiado 2 16 16.8 16.8 90.1 Son más bajos 3 6 6.2 6.2 96.2 No sabe 4 4 3.8 3.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 97 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 SIT ECONOMICA PERSONAL MEJOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 46 47.3 47.3 47.3 Igual (voluntario) 2 8 8.3 8.3 55.6 Peor 3 25 26.2 26.2 81.8 No sabe 4 16 16.9 16.9 98.7 No contestó 5 1 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 97 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE P6 QUIEN GUSTARIA FUERA PROXIMO PTE REP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas 1 10 10.7 10.7 10.7 Ernesto Zedillo 2 31 31.9 31.9 42.6 Diego Fdez. de Ceval 3 35 35.9 35.9 78.4 Otro 4 6 5.9 5.9 84.3 No sabe 5 10 10.0 10.0 94.3 No contestó 6 5 5.7 5.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 97 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7 COMO CONSID SIT ECONOM ACTUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 24 24.7 24.7 24.7 Igual (voluntario) 2 29 30.1 30.1 54.8 Peor 3 41 42.3 42.3 97.1 No sabe 4 2 1.6 1.6 98.7 No contestó 5 1 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 97 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8 ACUERDO FORMA DE GOBERNAR PRESIDENTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent De acuerdo 1 48 49.7 49.7 49.7 De acuerdo en parte 2 18 19.0 19.0 68.7 En desacuerdo 3 24 24.5 24.5 93.2 No sabe 4 1 .8 .8 94.1 No contestó 5 6 5.9 5.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 97 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PATR1 Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 8 7.8 7.8 7.8 Zedillo 2 27 27.8 27.8 35.5 Cevallos 3 43 44.3 44.3 79.8 Ninguno 4 2 2.3 2.3 82.1 NS-NC 5 17 17.9 17.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 97 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2 mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 14 14.9 14.9 14.9 Zedillo 2 28 28.6 28.6 43.6 Cevallos 3 31 32.3 32.3 75.8 Ninguno 4 11 11.5 11.5 87.3 NS-NC 5 12 12.7 12.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 97 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR3 Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 12 12.1 12.1 12.1 Zedillo 2 16 17.0 17.0 29.1 Cevallos 3 57 59.3 59.3 88.5 Ninguno 4 2 2.3 2.3 90.8 NS-NC 5 9 9.2 9.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 97 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PATR4 Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 20 21.1 21.1 21.1 Zedillo 2 35 36.5 36.5 57.6 Cevallos 3 25 25.9 25.9 83.5 Ninguno 4 6 6.2 6.2 89.7 NS-NC 5 10 10.3 10.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 97 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR5 Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 13 13.9 13.9 13.9 Zedillo 2 34 34.8 34.8 48.7 Cevallos 3 33 34.0 34.0 82.7 Ninguno 4 6 6.1 6.1 88.8 NS-NC 5 11 11.2 11.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 97 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6 Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 13 13.7 13.7 13.7 Zedillo 2 25 26.2 26.2 39.9 Cevallos 3 19 19.5 19.5 59.4 Ninguno 4 11 11.7 11.7 71.1 NS-NC 5 28 28.9 28.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 97 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PATR7 MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 10 10.2 10.2 10.2 Zedillo 2 35 35.9 35.9 46.1 Cevallos 3 36 37.5 37.5 83.5 Ninguno 4 4 4.6 4.6 88.1 NS-NC 5 11 11.9 11.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 97 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8 PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 13 13.8 13.8 13.8 Zedillo 2 25 26.0 26.0 39.8 Cevallos 3 23 23.4 23.4 63.2 Ninguno 4 14 14.6 14.6 77.8 NS-NC 5 21 22.2 22.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 97 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR9 Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 10 10.8 10.8 10.8 Zedillo 2 23 24.1 24.1 34.9 Cevallos 3 43 44.7 44.7 79.6 Ninguno 4 5 5.3 5.3 85.0 NS-NC 5 15 15.0 15.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 97 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PATR1_A Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 1 .8 2.0 2.0 Zedillo 2 14 14.9 38.9 40.9 Cevallos 3 16 16.2 42.5 83.4 NS-NC 5 6 6.3 16.6 100.0 . 60 61.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 37 Missing cases 60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2_A mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 3 3.2 8.3 8.3 Zedillo 2 14 14.1 37.0 45.2 Cevallos 3 14 14.7 38.5 83.8 Ninguno 4 1 1.3 3.4 87.2 NS-NC 5 5 4.9 12.8 100.0 . 60 61.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 37 Missing cases 60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR3_A Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 4 3.7 9.7 9.7 Zedillo 2 8 8.8 23.0 32.7 Cevallos 3 22 22.6 59.1 91.8 NS-NC 5 3 3.1 8.2 100.0 . 60 61.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 37 Missing cases 60 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PATR4_A Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 5 4.7 12.3 12.3 Zedillo 2 16 16.4 43.1 55.4 Cevallos 3 12 12.1 31.7 87.1 Ninguno 4 2 1.8 4.8 92.0 NS-NC 5 3 3.1 8.0 100.0 . 60 61.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 37 Missing cases 60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR5_A Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 4 3.7 9.7 9.7 Zedillo 2 16 16.4 43.0 52.7 Cevallos 3 13 13.4 35.1 87.8 Ninguno 4 1 1.0 2.6 90.4 NS-NC 5 4 3.7 9.6 100.0 . 60 61.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 37 Missing cases 60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6_A Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 2 2.4 6.3 6.3 Zedillo 2 10 10.4 27.2 33.5 Cevallos 3 12 12.6 32.9 66.4 NS-NC 5 12 12.8 33.6 100.0 . 60 61.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 37 Missing cases 60 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PATR7_A MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 1 1.5 4.0 4.0 Zedillo 2 16 16.4 42.9 46.9 Cevallos 3 16 16.7 43.7 90.6 NS-NC 5 3 3.6 9.4 100.0 . 60 61.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 37 Missing cases 60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8_A PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 2 2.1 5.4 5.4 Zedillo 2 14 14.9 38.9 44.3 Cevallos 3 12 12.6 32.9 77.2 Ninguno 4 2 1.6 4.2 81.4 NS-NC 5 7 7.1 18.6 100.0 . 60 61.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 37 Missing cases 60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR9_A Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 1 .8 2.0 2.0 Zedillo 2 12 12.9 33.7 35.7 Cevallos 3 17 17.4 45.6 81.3 Ninguno 4 1 .8 2.0 83.3 NS-NC 5 6 6.4 16.7 100.0 . 60 61.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 37 Missing cases 60 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PATR1_B Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 7 7.0 11.3 11.3 Zedillo 2 12 12.9 20.9 32.2 Cevallos 3 27 28.1 45.4 77.6 Ninguno 4 2 2.3 3.7 81.3 NS-NC 5 11 11.6 18.7 100.0 . 37 38.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 60 Missing cases 37 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2_B mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 11 11.8 19.0 19.0 Zedillo 2 14 14.5 23.5 42.5 Cevallos 3 17 17.6 28.4 70.9 Ninguno 4 10 10.2 16.5 87.4 NS-NC 5 8 7.8 12.6 100.0 . 37 38.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 60 Missing cases 37 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PATR3_B Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 8 8.4 13.6 13.6 Zedillo 2 8 8.2 13.3 27.0 Cevallos 3 36 36.8 59.5 86.4 Ninguno 4 2 2.3 3.7 90.1 NS-NC 5 6 6.1 9.9 100.0 . 37 38.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 60 Missing cases 37 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR4_B Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 16 16.4 26.5 26.5 Zedillo 2 19 20.1 32.4 58.9 Cevallos 3 13 13.8 22.3 81.3 Ninguno 4 4 4.3 7.0 88.3 NS-NC 5 7 7.2 11.7 100.0 . 37 38.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 60 Missing cases 37 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PATR5_B Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 10 10.2 16.5 16.5 Zedillo 2 18 18.4 29.8 46.3 Cevallos 3 20 20.6 33.3 79.6 Ninguno 4 5 5.1 8.3 87.8 NS-NC 5 7 7.5 12.2 100.0 . 37 38.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 60 Missing cases 37 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6_B Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 11 11.3 18.3 18.3 Zedillo 2 15 15.8 25.5 43.8 Cevallos 3 7 6.9 11.2 55.0 Ninguno 4 11 11.7 18.9 73.9 NS-NC 5 16 16.1 26.1 100.0 . 37 38.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 60 Missing cases 37 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PATR7_B MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 8 8.7 14.0 14.0 Zedillo 2 19 19.5 31.6 45.6 Cevallos 3 20 20.8 33.6 79.2 Ninguno 4 4 4.6 7.4 86.6 NS-NC 5 8 8.3 13.4 100.0 . 37 38.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 60 Missing cases 37 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8_B PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 11 11.7 18.9 18.9 Zedillo 2 11 11.2 18.0 37.0 Cevallos 3 10 10.9 17.5 54.5 Ninguno 4 13 13.0 21.0 75.5 NS-NC 5 15 15.1 24.5 100.0 . 37 38.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 60 Missing cases 37 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PATR9_B Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 10 10.1 16.3 16.3 Zedillo 2 11 11.2 18.2 34.5 Cevallos 3 26 27.3 44.2 78.6 Ninguno 4 4 4.6 7.4 86.0 NS-NC 5 8 8.7 14.0 100.0 . 37 38.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 60 Missing cases 37 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT1_A VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 7 7.2 56.5 56.5 DOS 2 4 4.0 31.6 88.0 TRES 3 1 .8 6.0 94.0 CUATRO 4 1 .8 6.0 100.0 . 83 86.0 Missing CERO 0 1 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 12 Missing cases 84 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PVOT2_A VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 4 4.4 18.3 18.3 DOS 2 6 5.7 23.7 42.0 TRES 3 3 3.3 13.7 55.7 CUATRO 4 2 1.7 7.2 62.9 CINCO 5 9 9.0 37.1 100.0 . 72 74.8 Missing CERO 0 1 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 23 Missing cases 73 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT3_A VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 5 5.7 25.3 25.3 DOS 2 7 6.9 30.8 56.1 TRES 3 5 4.8 21.4 77.5 CINCO 5 5 5.0 22.5 100.0 . 75 77.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 22 Missing cases 75 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4_A VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 2.3 100.0 100.0 . 94 97.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 94 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PVOT5_A VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 1.0 100.0 100.0 . 96 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 96 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT6_A VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 1.0 30.4 30.4 DOS 2 1 1.0 30.4 60.7 CINCO 5 1 1.3 39.3 100.0 . 93 96.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 93 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7_A VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 1.0 100.0 100.0 . 96 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 96 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PVOT8_A VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 97 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 97 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT9_A VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 1.0 100.0 100.0 . 96 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 96 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10_A VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 97 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 97 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PVOT11_A VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 97 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 97 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT12_A VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 2 1.6 100.0 100.0 . 94 97.1 Missing CERO 0 1 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 95 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13_A VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 2 2.2 100.0 100.0 . 94 97.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 94 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PVOT1_B VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 9 9.0 45.2 45.2 DOS 2 1 1.0 5.0 50.2 TRES 3 2 2.2 10.8 61.0 CINCO 5 8 7.8 39.0 100.0 . 74 76.2 Missing CERO 0 4 3.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 19 Missing cases 77 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT2_B VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 8 8.1 28.4 28.4 DOS 2 10 10.0 35.0 63.5 TRES 3 1 .9 3.1 66.5 CINCO 5 9 9.5 33.5 100.0 . 67 69.4 Missing CERO 0 2 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 27 Missing cases 69 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PVOT3_B VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 3 3.2 10.7 10.7 DOS 2 11 11.2 37.8 48.5 TRES 3 6 5.8 19.6 68.1 CUATRO 4 3 3.5 11.6 79.7 CINCO 5 6 6.0 20.3 100.0 . 66 68.1 Missing CERO 0 2 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 29 Missing cases 68 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4_B VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 91 94.1 Missing CERO 0 6 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 97 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT5_B VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 1.0 100.0 100.0 . 90 93.1 Missing CERO 0 6 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 96 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PVOT6_B VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .8 27.0 27.0 DOS 2 1 1.3 46.0 73.0 CINCO 5 1 .8 27.0 100.0 . 88 91.3 Missing CERO 0 6 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 94 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7_B VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 3 3.0 100.0 100.0 . 88 91.1 Missing CERO 0 6 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 94 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT8_B VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 91 94.1 Missing CERO 0 6 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 97 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PVOT9_B VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 1.3 100.0 100.0 . 90 92.8 Missing CERO 0 6 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 95 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10_B VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 2.1 48.7 48.7 DOS 2 1 .9 20.7 69.3 CINCO 5 1 1.3 30.7 100.0 . 88 90.6 Missing CERO 0 5 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 92 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT11_B VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .8 19.0 19.0 CINCO 5 3 3.6 81.0 100.0 . 87 90.5 Missing CERO 0 5 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 92 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PVOT12_B VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 7 7.5 100.0 100.0 . 84 86.6 Missing CERO 0 6 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 7 Missing cases 89 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13_B VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 2 1.6 100.0 100.0 . 88 91.2 Missing CERO 0 7 7.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 95 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT1 VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 16 16.2 49.6 49.6 DOS 2 5 5.0 15.4 64.9 TRES 3 3 2.9 8.9 73.9 CUATRO 4 1 .8 2.3 76.2 CINCO 5 8 7.8 23.8 100.0 CERO 0 65 67.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 32 Missing cases 65 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PVOT2 VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 12 12.5 23.8 23.8 DOS 2 15 15.7 29.8 53.6 TRES 3 4 4.2 7.9 61.5 CUATRO 4 2 1.7 3.3 64.9 CINCO 5 18 18.5 35.1 100.0 CERO 0 46 47.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 51 Missing cases 46 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT3 VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 9 8.8 17.0 17.0 DOS 2 17 18.1 34.8 51.7 TRES 3 10 10.6 20.4 72.1 CUATRO 4 3 3.5 6.6 78.7 CINCO 5 11 11.1 21.3 100.0 CERO 0 46 47.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 50 Missing cases 46 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4 VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 2.3 100.0 100.0 CERO 0 94 97.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 94 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PVOT5 VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 2.0 100.0 100.0 CERO 0 95 98.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 95 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT6 VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 1.8 28.8 28.8 DOS 2 2 2.3 37.6 66.4 CINCO 5 2 2.1 33.6 100.0 CERO 0 91 93.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6 Missing cases 91 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7 VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 4 4.0 100.0 100.0 CERO 0 93 96.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 93 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PVOT8 VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 97 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 97 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT9 VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 2.3 100.0 100.0 CERO 0 94 97.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 94 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10 VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 2.1 48.7 48.7 DOS 2 1 .9 20.7 69.3 CINCO 5 1 1.3 30.7 100.0 CERO 0 92 95.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 92 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PVOT11 VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .8 19.0 19.0 CINCO 5 3 3.6 81.0 100.0 CERO 0 92 95.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 92 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT12 VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 9 9.1 100.0 100.0 CERO 0 88 90.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 9 Missing cases 88 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13 VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 4 3.8 100.0 100.0 CERO 0 93 96.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 93 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 32 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PELE SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 29 29.9 29.9 29.9 CCS del PRD 2 13 13.4 13.4 43.3 DFC del PAN 3 37 38.4 38.4 81.7 Por ninguno 5 2 2.3 2.3 84.0 No sabe 6 10 10.3 10.3 94.3 No contestó 7 5 5.7 5.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 97 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE_A SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA A Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 11 11.2 29.5 29.5 CCS del PRD 2 3 3.5 9.2 38.7 DFC del PAN 3 14 14.9 39.0 77.6 Por ninguno 5 1 1.0 2.6 80.3 No sabe 6 4 4.6 12.1 92.3 No contestó 7 3 2.9 7.7 100.0 . 60 61.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 37 Missing cases 60 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 33 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE PELE_B SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA B Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 18 18.7 30.2 30.2 CCS del PRD 2 10 9.9 16.1 46.2 DFC del PAN 3 23 23.5 38.0 84.3 Por ninguno 5 1 1.3 2.1 86.4 No sabe 6 5 5.7 9.2 95.5 No contestó 7 3 2.8 4.5 100.0 . 37 38.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 60 Missing cases 37 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 45 46.7 46.7 46.7 femenino 2 51 53.3 53.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 97 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 30 31.1 31.1 31.1 26-40 2 34 35.5 35.5 66.6 41-60 3 22 23.3 23.3 89.9 61 + 4 10 10.1 10.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 97 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 34 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE INST Institución donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 49 50.7 51.1 51.1 gob fed 2 10 10.5 10.6 61.7 paraestatal 3 2 2.3 2.3 64.0 emp priv 4 16 16.9 17.0 81.0 negocio prop 5 10 10.0 10.1 91.1 independiente 6 9 8.8 8.9 100.0 . 1 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 96 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 25 25.8 50.8 50.8 estudiante 2 16 16.4 32.3 83.1 jubilado 3 6 6.5 12.9 96.0 desemp 4 2 2.0 4.0 100.0 0 48 49.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 49 Missing cases 48 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 35 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE ACTIV Rama de actividad económica Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent industria 2 6 5.8 12.0 12.0 comercio 3 9 9.5 19.6 31.6 construc 4 4 3.8 7.9 39.4 educación 5 6 5.9 12.1 51.6 otros servs 6 23 23.5 48.4 100.0 . 1 .8 Missing 0 49 50.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 47 Missing cases 50 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUESTO Que puesto ocupa en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario, Patron o 1 6 5.7 11.8 11.8 Directivo o Func de 2 4 4.4 9.0 20.8 Contratista o trabaj 3 12 12.7 26.1 46.9 Profesionista Indepe 4 1 .9 1.8 48.7 Emplea, trabaj, Obre 5 24 24.9 51.3 100.0 . 1 .8 Missing 0 49 50.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 47 Missing cases 50 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 36 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent prim inc 2 4 3.9 3.9 3.9 prim comp 3 11 11.3 11.4 15.3 sec incom 4 6 6.2 6.2 21.5 sec comp 5 26 27.0 27.2 48.7 prep incom 6 6 6.2 6.2 54.9 prep comp 7 11 11.6 11.7 66.6 univ incom 8 15 15.0 15.1 81.7 univ comp + 9 18 18.2 18.3 100.0 . 1 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 96 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 2 2.2 2.2 2.2 1-3 sm 2 24 24.5 24.7 26.9 3-5 sm 3 19 19.3 19.4 46.3 5-7 sm 4 2 2.3 2.3 48.6 7-10 5 6 6.5 6.5 55.2 10 + SM 6 26 27.4 27.6 82.7 7 17 17.1 17.3 100.0 . 1 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 97 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 96 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 37 ROLLOVER (4?) NACIONAL SOLO DF 1/JUL/94 TELEFONICA 7/1/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL1DF.FRE This procedure was completed at 20:05:37 End of Include file.