The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 354 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 7196 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 899 Value Labels for each Variable. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 4 ROLL OVER (4) JALISCO 4/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL40295.FR1 P1 SITUACION ECONOMICA COMUNIDAD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 13 3.7 3.7 3.7 Igual 2 28 7.9 7.9 11.6 Peor 3 309 87.3 87.3 98.9 No sabe 4 3 .8 .8 99.7 No contestó 5 1 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 SATISFECHO CON NIVEL DE VIDA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 125 35.3 35.3 35.3 Si parte 2 48 13.6 13.6 48.9 No 3 180 50.8 50.8 99.7 No contestó 4 1 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PEST6 QUIEN LE INSPIRA CONFIANZA... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 137 38.7 38.7 38.7 A Cárdenas J 2 123 34.7 34.7 73.4 Mario Saucedo 3 11 3.1 3.1 76.6 Ninguno 4 28 7.9 7.9 84.5 No sabe 5 32 9.0 9.0 93.5 No contestó 6 23 6.5 6.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 5 ROLL OVER (4) JALISCO 4/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL40295.FR1 P4 SITUACION ECON PROX AÑO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 172 48.6 48.6 48.6 Igual 2 28 7.9 7.9 56.5 Peor 3 94 26.6 26.6 83.1 No sabe 4 50 14.1 14.1 97.2 No contestó 5 10 2.8 2.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 QUIEN PARA PROX GOBERNADOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 136 38.4 38.4 38.4 A Cárdenas J 2 134 37.9 37.9 76.3 Mario Saucedo 3 7 2.0 2.0 78.2 Ninguno 4 8 2.3 2.3 80.5 No sabe 5 43 12.1 12.1 92.7 No contestó 6 26 7.3 7.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6 SITUACION ECONOMICA FAMILIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 56 15.8 15.9 15.9 Igual 2 57 16.1 16.1 32.0 Peor 3 232 65.5 65.7 97.7 No sabe 4 6 1.7 1.7 99.4 No contestó 5 2 .6 .6 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 353 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 6 ROLL OVER (4) JALISCO 4/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL40295.FR1 PELE7 SI HOY ELECC JAL POR QUIEN VOTA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Eugenio Ruiz PRI 1 129 36.4 36.4 36.4 A Cárdenas J PAN 2 135 38.1 38.1 74.6 M Saucedo PRD 3 12 3.4 3.4 78.0 Ninguno 5 16 4.5 4.5 82.5 No sabe 6 37 10.5 10.5 92.9 No contestó 7 25 7.1 7.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7_1 ACUERDO CON..Pte de la República Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Acuerdo 1 139 39.3 39.3 39.3 Desacuerdo 2 133 37.6 37.6 76.8 No sabe 3 58 16.4 16.4 93.2 No contestó 4 24 6.8 6.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7_2 ACUERDO CON..Gobernador Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Acuerdo 1 166 46.9 47.0 47.0 Desacuerdo 2 138 39.0 39.1 86.1 No sabe 3 33 9.3 9.3 95.5 No contestó 4 16 4.5 4.5 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 353 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 ROLL OVER (4) JALISCO 4/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL40295.FR1 P7_3 ACUERDO CON..Pdte. Municipal Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Acuerdo 1 166 46.9 47.0 47.0 Desacuerdo 2 136 38.4 38.5 85.6 No sabe 3 33 9.3 9.3 94.9 No contestó 4 18 5.1 5.1 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 353 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL1 VOTOS A..Eugenio Ruiz O PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 28 7.9 14.7 14.7 DOS 2 46 13.0 24.1 38.7 TRES 3 30 8.5 15.7 54.5 CUATRO 4 8 2.3 4.2 58.6 CINCO 5 79 22.3 41.4 100.0 0 163 46.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 191 Missing cases 163 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL2 VOTOS A..Alberto Cárdenas PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 22 6.2 11.5 11.5 DOS 2 42 11.9 22.0 33.5 TRES 3 40 11.3 20.9 54.5 CUATRO 4 14 4.0 7.3 61.8 CINCO 5 73 20.6 38.2 100.0 0 163 46.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 191 Missing cases 163 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 ROLL OVER (4) JALISCO 4/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL40295.FR1 PBOL3 VOTOS A..Mario Saucedo PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 46 13.0 66.7 66.7 DOS 2 15 4.2 21.7 88.4 TRES 3 5 1.4 7.2 95.7 CINCO 5 3 .8 4.3 100.0 0 285 80.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 69 Missing cases 285 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL4 VOTOS A..Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 16 4.5 80.0 80.0 DOS 2 4 1.1 20.0 100.0 0 334 94.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 20 Missing cases 334 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL5 VOTOS A..A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .3 7.7 7.7 CINCO 5 12 3.4 92.3 100.0 0 341 96.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 13 Missing cases 341 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 ROLL OVER (4) JALISCO 4/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL40295.FR1 PBOL6 VOTOS A..No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 39 11.0 100.0 100.0 0 315 89.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 39 Missing cases 315 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL7 VOTOS A..No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .3 4.8 4.8 CUATRO 4 1 .3 4.8 9.5 CINCO 5 19 5.4 90.5 100.0 0 333 94.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 21 Missing cases 333 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR1 QUIEN ES..Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 142 40.1 40.1 40.1 Alberto Cardenas 2 85 24.0 24.0 64.1 Mario Saucedo 3 17 4.8 4.8 68.9 Ninguno 4 8 2.3 2.3 71.2 No Sabe/No C 5 102 28.8 28.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 ROLL OVER (4) JALISCO 4/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL40295.FR1 PATR2 QUIEN ES..Más experiencia Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 194 54.8 54.8 54.8 Alberto Cardenas 2 74 20.9 20.9 75.7 Mario Saucedo 3 6 1.7 1.7 77.4 Ninguno 4 6 1.7 1.7 79.1 No Sabe/No C 5 74 20.9 20.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR3 QUIEN ES..Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 158 44.6 44.6 44.6 Alberto Cardenas 2 101 28.5 28.5 73.2 Mario Saucedo 3 17 4.8 4.8 78.0 Ninguno 4 8 2.3 2.3 80.2 No Sabe/No C 5 70 19.8 19.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR4 QUIEN ES..Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 161 45.5 45.5 45.5 Alberto Cardenas 2 98 27.7 27.7 73.2 Mario Saucedo 3 8 2.3 2.3 75.4 Ninguno 4 13 3.7 3.7 79.1 No Sabe/No C 5 74 20.9 20.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 ROLL OVER (4) JALISCO 4/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL40295.FR1 PATR5 QUIEN ES..Mejor opción para edo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 124 35.0 35.0 35.0 Alberto Cardenas 2 134 37.9 37.9 72.9 Mario Saucedo 3 10 2.8 2.8 75.7 Ninguno 4 4 1.1 1.1 76.8 No Sabe/No C 5 82 23.2 23.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6 QUIEN ES..Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 79 22.3 22.3 22.3 Alberto Cardenas 2 105 29.7 29.7 52.0 Mario Saucedo 3 11 3.1 3.1 55.1 Ninguno 4 19 5.4 5.4 60.5 No Sabe/No C 5 140 39.5 39.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR7 QUIEN ES..Más personalidad Gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 156 44.1 44.1 44.1 Alberto Cardenas 2 107 30.2 30.2 74.3 Mario Saucedo 3 10 2.8 2.8 77.1 Ninguno 4 5 1.4 1.4 78.5 No Sabe/No C 5 76 21.5 21.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 ROLL OVER (4) JALISCO 4/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL40295.FR1 PATR8 QUIEN ES..Puede resolver pobreza Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 102 28.8 28.8 28.8 Alberto Cardenas 2 90 25.4 25.4 54.2 Mario Saucedo 3 7 2.0 2.0 56.2 Ninguno 4 44 12.4 12.4 68.6 No Sabe/No C 5 111 31.4 31.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR9 QUIEN ES..Habla mas con verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 105 29.7 29.7 29.7 Alberto Cardenas 2 113 31.9 31.9 61.6 Mario Saucedo 3 11 3.1 3.1 64.7 Ninguno 4 27 7.6 7.6 72.3 No Sabe/No C 5 98 27.7 27.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8 CUALIDAD PARA EL PROXIMO GOBERNADOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXPERIENCIA-INTELIG 1 127 35.9 35.9 35.9 OPCION DE CAMBIO 2 188 53.1 53.1 89.0 NINGUNA 3 8 2.3 2.3 91.2 NS-NC 4 31 8.8 8.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 ROLL OVER (4) JALISCO 4/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL40295.FR1 SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 177 50.0 50.0 50.0 femenino 2 177 50.0 50.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 97 27.4 27.4 27.4 26-40 2 153 43.2 43.2 70.6 41-60 3 83 23.4 23.4 94.1 61 + 4 21 5.9 5.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INST Institución donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 154 43.5 43.5 43.5 gob fed 2 29 8.2 8.2 51.7 paraestatal 3 5 1.4 1.4 53.1 emp priv 4 83 23.4 23.4 76.6 negocio prop 5 28 7.9 7.9 84.5 independiente 6 55 15.5 15.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 ROLL OVER (4) JALISCO 4/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL40295.FR1 OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 106 29.9 68.8 68.8 estudiante 2 29 8.2 18.8 87.7 jubilado 3 7 2.0 4.5 92.2 desemp 4 10 2.8 6.5 98.7 otro 5 2 .6 1.3 100.0 0 200 56.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 154 Missing cases 200 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACTIV Rama de actividad económica Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent agric 1 4 1.1 2.0 2.0 industria 2 17 4.8 8.5 10.5 comercio 3 59 16.7 29.5 40.0 construc 4 5 1.4 2.5 42.5 educación 5 17 4.8 8.5 51.0 otros servs 6 98 27.7 49.0 100.0 0 154 43.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 200 Missing cases 154 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 ROLL OVER (4) JALISCO 4/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL40295.FR1 PUESTO Que puesto ocupa en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario, Patron o 1 16 4.5 8.0 8.0 Directivo o Func de 2 6 1.7 3.0 11.0 Contratista o trabaj 3 51 14.4 25.5 36.5 Profesionista Indepe 4 14 4.0 7.0 43.5 Emplea, trabaj, Obre 5 112 31.6 56.0 99.5 Otro 7 1 .3 .5 100.0 0 154 43.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 200 Missing cases 154 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 11 3.1 3.1 3.1 prim inc 2 20 5.6 5.6 8.8 prim comp 3 64 18.1 18.1 26.8 sec incom 4 8 2.3 2.3 29.1 sec comp 5 94 26.6 26.6 55.6 prep incom 6 19 5.4 5.4 61.0 prep comp 7 51 14.4 14.4 75.4 univ incom 8 26 7.3 7.3 82.8 univ comp + 9 61 17.2 17.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 ROLL OVER (4) JALISCO 4/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL40295.FR1 INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 28 7.9 7.9 7.9 1-3 sm 2 92 26.0 26.0 33.9 3-5 sm 3 70 19.8 19.8 53.7 5-7 sm 4 28 7.9 7.9 61.6 7-10 5 38 10.7 10.7 72.3 10 + SM 6 53 15.0 15.0 87.3 7 45 12.7 12.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 354 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 ROLL OVER (4) JALISCO 4/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/6/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JAL40295.FR1 This procedure was completed at 12:34:03 End of Include file.