The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 105 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 9842 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 1230 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1 SITUACION DEL PAIS MEJOR? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 23 21.8 21.8 21.8 Igual (voluntario) 2 22 21.2 21.2 43.0 Peor 3 58 54.8 54.8 97.8 No sabe 4 2 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 SATISFECHO CON EL NIVEL DE VIDA ACTUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 50 47.4 47.4 47.4 Si en parte 2 17 16.6 16.6 64.1 No 3 35 33.3 33.3 97.4 No contestó 4 3 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 6 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE P3 CANDIDATO INSPIRA MAS CONFIANZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas 1 12 11.6 11.6 11.6 Ernesto Zedillo 2 46 44.2 44.2 55.7 Diego Fdez. de Ceval 3 24 23.2 23.2 78.9 Ninguno 4 9 8.6 8.6 87.5 No sabe 5 11 10.9 10.9 98.4 No contestó 6 2 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4 PRECIOS DE COMPRA HABITALES MAS ALTOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Son más altos 1 72 69.0 69.0 69.0 No han cambiado 2 24 22.5 22.5 91.4 Son más bajos 3 7 7.0 7.0 98.4 No sabe 4 2 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 SIT ECONOMICA PERSONAL MEJOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 55 52.8 52.8 52.8 Igual (voluntario) 2 10 9.1 9.1 61.9 Peor 3 13 12.1 12.1 74.0 No sabe 4 26 24.5 24.5 98.5 No contestó 5 2 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE P6 QUIEN GUSTARIA FUERA PROXIMO PTE REP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas 1 11 10.7 10.7 10.7 Ernesto Zedillo 2 43 40.5 40.5 51.2 Diego Fdez. de Ceval 3 23 21.9 21.9 73.2 Otro 4 5 4.4 4.4 77.5 No sabe 5 18 16.7 16.7 94.2 No contestó 6 6 5.8 5.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7 COMO CONSID SIT ECONOM ACTUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 35 33.2 33.2 33.2 Igual (voluntario) 2 25 24.0 24.0 57.2 Peor 3 42 39.5 39.5 96.8 No sabe 4 3 3.2 3.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8 ACUERDO FORMA DE GOBERNAR PRESIDENTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent De acuerdo 1 61 58.2 58.2 58.2 De acuerdo en parte 2 18 17.2 17.2 75.4 En desacuerdo 3 20 19.3 19.3 94.8 No sabe 4 4 3.6 3.6 98.4 No contestó 5 2 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PATR1 Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 10 9.4 9.4 9.4 Zedillo 2 34 32.5 32.5 41.9 Cevallos 3 29 27.3 27.3 69.2 Ninguno 4 4 3.6 3.6 72.8 NS-NC 5 29 27.2 27.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2 mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 15 14.4 14.4 14.4 Zedillo 2 46 43.4 43.4 57.8 Cevallos 3 17 16.0 16.0 73.8 Ninguno 4 8 7.7 7.7 81.5 NS-NC 5 19 18.5 18.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR3 Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 10 9.5 9.5 9.5 Zedillo 2 35 33.5 33.5 43.0 Cevallos 3 44 41.8 41.8 84.8 Ninguno 4 1 .6 .6 85.4 NS-NC 5 15 14.6 14.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PATR4 Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 21 19.6 19.6 19.6 Zedillo 2 40 38.2 38.2 57.7 Cevallos 3 19 18.5 18.5 76.2 Ninguno 4 7 6.8 6.8 83.0 NS-NC 5 18 17.0 17.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR5 Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 13 11.9 11.9 11.9 Zedillo 2 44 42.2 42.2 54.1 Cevallos 3 26 24.5 24.5 78.7 Ninguno 4 1 1.2 1.2 79.9 NS-NC 5 21 20.1 20.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6 Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 14 13.2 13.2 13.2 Zedillo 2 31 29.6 29.6 42.9 Cevallos 3 19 17.9 17.9 60.8 Ninguno 4 10 9.4 9.4 70.2 NS-NC 5 31 29.8 29.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PATR7 MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 15 14.5 14.5 14.5 Zedillo 2 39 36.7 36.7 51.2 Cevallos 3 30 28.4 28.4 79.7 Ninguno 4 5 4.8 4.8 84.4 NS-NC 5 16 15.6 15.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8 PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 12 11.0 11.0 11.0 Zedillo 2 30 28.3 28.3 39.3 Cevallos 3 22 20.8 20.8 60.1 Ninguno 4 17 16.3 16.3 76.4 NS-NC 5 25 23.6 23.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR9 Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 12 11.7 11.9 11.9 Zedillo 2 27 25.8 26.2 38.0 Cevallos 3 28 26.3 26.7 64.7 Ninguno 4 7 6.7 6.8 71.5 NS-NC 5 30 28.2 28.5 100.0 0 1 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 104 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PATR1_A Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 6 5.9 8.9 8.9 Zedillo 2 23 21.6 32.9 41.8 Cevallos 3 15 14.7 22.3 64.1 Ninguno 4 4 3.6 5.4 69.6 NS-NC 5 21 20.0 30.4 100.0 . 36 34.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 69 Missing cases 36 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2_A mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 11 10.3 15.7 15.7 Zedillo 2 29 27.8 42.3 57.9 Cevallos 3 8 7.6 11.6 69.6 Ninguno 4 5 4.6 7.0 76.5 NS-NC 5 16 15.4 23.5 100.0 . 36 34.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 69 Missing cases 36 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PATR3_A Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 7 6.7 10.2 10.2 Zedillo 2 23 21.6 32.8 43.0 Cevallos 3 26 24.7 37.5 80.5 Ninguno 4 1 .6 .9 81.5 NS-NC 5 13 12.2 18.5 100.0 . 36 34.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 69 Missing cases 36 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR4_A Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 11 10.6 16.2 16.2 Zedillo 2 26 24.9 37.8 54.0 Cevallos 3 11 10.9 16.6 70.6 Ninguno 4 6 6.0 9.2 79.8 NS-NC 5 14 13.3 20.2 100.0 . 36 34.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 69 Missing cases 36 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PATR5_A Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 7 6.9 10.6 10.6 Zedillo 2 30 28.4 43.2 53.7 Cevallos 3 15 14.2 21.5 75.3 Ninguno 4 1 .6 .9 76.2 NS-NC 5 16 15.6 23.8 100.0 . 36 34.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 69 Missing cases 36 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6_A Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 7 6.9 10.6 10.6 Zedillo 2 19 18.1 27.5 38.1 Cevallos 3 10 9.5 14.4 52.5 Ninguno 4 7 6.7 10.2 62.7 NS-NC 5 26 24.5 37.3 100.0 . 36 34.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 69 Missing cases 36 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PATR7_A MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 9 8.8 13.4 13.4 Zedillo 2 22 20.9 31.7 45.1 Cevallos 3 19 18.1 27.6 72.7 Ninguno 4 4 4.1 6.2 78.9 NS-NC 5 15 13.9 21.1 100.0 . 36 34.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 69 Missing cases 36 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8_A PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 7 6.8 10.4 10.4 Zedillo 2 19 17.6 26.8 37.2 Cevallos 3 12 11.8 17.9 55.2 Ninguno 4 13 12.8 19.4 74.6 NS-NC 5 18 16.7 25.4 100.0 . 36 34.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 69 Missing cases 36 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PATR9_A Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 9 8.2 12.7 12.7 Zedillo 2 15 14.5 22.5 35.2 Cevallos 3 16 15.1 23.4 58.6 Ninguno 4 7 6.7 10.3 68.9 NS-NC 5 21 20.0 31.1 100.0 . 37 35.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 68 Missing cases 37 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR1_B Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 4 3.5 10.3 10.3 Zedillo 2 11 10.9 31.8 42.1 Cevallos 3 13 12.6 36.9 78.9 NS-NC 5 8 7.2 21.1 100.0 . 69 65.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 36 Missing cases 69 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2_B mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 4 4.1 12.1 12.1 Zedillo 2 16 15.6 45.5 57.6 Cevallos 3 9 8.3 24.3 81.9 Ninguno 4 3 3.1 9.1 91.0 NS-NC 5 3 3.1 9.0 100.0 . 69 65.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 36 Missing cases 69 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PATR3_B Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 3 2.8 8.2 8.2 Zedillo 2 13 11.9 34.7 42.9 Cevallos 3 18 17.2 50.1 93.0 NS-NC 5 3 2.4 7.0 100.0 . 69 65.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 36 Missing cases 69 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR4_B Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 9 8.9 26.0 26.0 Zedillo 2 14 13.3 38.9 64.9 Cevallos 3 8 7.5 21.9 86.9 Ninguno 4 1 .7 2.1 88.9 NS-NC 5 4 3.8 11.1 100.0 . 69 65.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 36 Missing cases 69 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR5_B Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 5 5.0 14.5 14.5 Zedillo 2 15 13.9 40.4 54.9 Cevallos 3 11 10.4 30.3 85.2 Ninguno 4 1 .6 1.8 87.1 NS-NC 5 5 4.4 12.9 100.0 . 69 65.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 36 Missing cases 69 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PATR6_B Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 7 6.3 18.4 18.4 Zedillo 2 12 11.5 33.6 52.1 Cevallos 3 9 8.4 24.6 76.7 Ninguno 4 3 2.7 7.8 84.4 NS-NC 5 6 5.3 15.6 100.0 . 69 65.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 36 Missing cases 69 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR7_B MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 6 5.7 16.6 16.6 Zedillo 2 17 15.9 46.3 62.9 Cevallos 3 11 10.3 30.1 93.0 Ninguno 4 1 .7 2.1 95.1 NS-NC 5 2 1.7 4.9 100.0 . 69 65.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 36 Missing cases 69 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PATR8_B PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 4 4.1 12.1 12.1 Zedillo 2 11 10.7 31.1 43.2 Cevallos 3 10 9.1 26.4 69.6 Ninguno 4 4 3.5 10.3 79.9 NS-NC 5 7 6.9 20.1 100.0 . 69 65.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 36 Missing cases 69 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR9_B Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 4 3.5 10.3 10.3 Zedillo 2 12 11.4 33.2 43.4 Cevallos 3 12 11.2 32.8 76.2 NS-NC 5 9 8.2 23.8 100.0 . 69 65.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 36 Missing cases 69 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT1_A VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 .7 3.2 3.2 UNO 1 13 12.1 54.6 57.8 DOS 2 2 2.0 9.1 66.9 TRES 3 4 3.6 16.2 83.1 CINCO 5 4 3.8 16.9 100.0 . 82 77.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 23 Missing cases 82 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PVOT2_A VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 .6 1.6 1.6 UNO 1 4 4.1 10.5 12.2 DOS 2 13 12.6 32.6 44.7 TRES 3 9 8.5 22.0 66.7 CUATRO 4 3 2.6 6.9 73.6 CINCO 5 11 10.2 26.4 100.0 . 65 61.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 40 Missing cases 65 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT3_A VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 10 9.9 30.3 30.3 DOS 2 10 9.8 30.0 60.2 TRES 3 6 6.1 18.7 78.9 CUATRO 4 1 1.3 4.1 83.0 CINCO 5 6 5.6 17.0 100.0 . 71 67.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 34 Missing cases 71 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4_A VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 .6 25.8 25.8 UNO 1 2 1.8 74.2 100.0 . 102 97.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 102 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PVOT5_A VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 .6 100.0 100.0 . 104 99.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 104 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT6_A VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 2.0 47.4 47.4 DOS 2 2 2.2 52.6 100.0 . 101 95.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 101 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7_A VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 1.9 100.0 100.0 . 103 98.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 103 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PVOT8_A VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 .6 32.0 32.0 UNO 1 1 1.3 68.0 100.0 . 103 98.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 103 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT9_A VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 .6 25.8 25.8 UNO 1 2 1.8 74.2 100.0 . 102 97.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 102 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10_A VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 .6 50.0 50.0 UNO 1 1 .6 50.0 100.0 . 104 98.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 104 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PVOT11_A VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 .6 20.6 20.6 CINCO 5 3 2.4 79.4 100.0 . 102 97.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 102 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT12_A VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 .6 8.7 8.7 CINCO 5 7 6.5 91.3 100.0 . 97 92.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 7 Missing cases 97 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13_A VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.2 18.4 18.4 CINCO 5 6 5.5 81.6 100.0 . 98 93.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 7 Missing cases 98 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PVOT1_B VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 5 5.0 42.8 42.8 DOS 2 5 4.3 36.8 79.6 CINCO 5 2 2.4 20.4 100.0 . 93 88.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 12 Missing cases 93 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT2_B VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 5 4.7 22.0 22.0 DOS 2 3 2.5 11.8 33.8 TRES 3 3 2.7 12.5 46.3 CUATRO 4 2 1.5 7.0 53.3 CINCO 5 10 9.9 46.7 100.0 . 83 78.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 22 Missing cases 83 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT3_B VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 2.1 13.7 13.7 DOS 2 6 5.3 34.5 48.1 TRES 3 5 4.8 30.9 79.0 CUATRO 4 1 .6 4.0 83.1 CINCO 5 3 2.6 16.9 100.0 . 89 84.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 16 Missing cases 89 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PVOT4_B VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 105 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 105 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT5_B VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 105 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 105 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT6_B VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TRES 3 1 1.3 65.1 65.1 CINCO 5 1 .7 34.9 100.0 . 103 98.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 103 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PVOT7_B VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 1 .8 100.0 100.0 . 104 99.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 104 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT8_B VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 105 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 105 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT9_B VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 105 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 105 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PVOT10_B VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 105 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 105 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT11_B VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 105 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 105 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT12_B VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 3 3.0 100.0 100.0 . 102 97.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 102 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PVOT13_B VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 1 .6 100.0 100.0 . 104 99.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 104 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT1 VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 70 66.8 66.8 66.8 UNO 1 18 17.1 17.1 83.9 DOS 2 7 6.3 6.3 90.3 TRES 3 4 3.6 3.6 93.9 CINCO 5 6 6.1 6.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT2 VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 43 40.8 40.8 40.8 UNO 1 9 8.7 8.7 49.6 DOS 2 16 15.1 15.1 64.6 TRES 3 12 11.1 11.1 75.7 CUATRO 4 4 4.1 4.1 79.9 CINCO 5 21 20.1 20.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PVOT3 VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 54 51.9 51.9 51.9 UNO 1 13 12.0 12.0 63.9 DOS 2 16 15.1 15.1 79.0 TRES 3 11 10.9 10.9 89.9 CUATRO 4 2 2.0 2.0 91.8 CINCO 5 9 8.2 8.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4 VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 103 98.2 98.2 98.2 UNO 1 2 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT5 VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 105 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PVOT6 VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 99 93.8 93.8 93.8 UNO 1 2 2.0 2.0 95.8 DOS 2 2 2.2 2.2 98.0 TRES 3 1 1.3 1.3 99.3 CINCO 5 1 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7 VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 102 97.3 97.3 97.3 UNO 1 2 1.9 1.9 99.2 CINCO 5 1 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT8 VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 104 98.7 98.7 98.7 UNO 1 1 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PVOT9 VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 103 98.2 98.2 98.2 UNO 1 2 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10 VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 104 99.4 99.4 99.4 UNO 1 1 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT11 VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 102 97.6 97.6 97.6 CINCO 5 3 2.4 2.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PVOT12 VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 95 90.5 90.5 90.5 CINCO 5 10 9.5 9.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13 VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 99 93.9 93.9 93.9 CINCO 5 6 6.1 6.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 41 38.8 38.8 38.8 CCS del PRD 2 11 10.1 10.1 48.9 DFC del PAN 3 24 22.5 22.5 71.4 Por ninguno 5 6 5.9 5.9 77.3 No sabe 6 15 14.6 14.6 91.9 No contestó 7 8 8.1 8.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 32 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE PELE_A SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA A Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 26 25.1 38.2 38.2 CCS del PRD 2 7 6.6 10.0 48.2 DFC del PAN 3 12 11.4 17.4 65.6 Por ninguno 5 5 4.4 6.7 72.3 No sabe 6 12 11.4 17.4 89.6 No contestó 7 7 6.8 10.4 100.0 . 36 34.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 69 Missing cases 36 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE_B SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA B Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 14 13.7 39.9 39.9 CCS del PRD 2 4 3.5 10.3 50.2 DFC del PAN 3 12 11.1 32.3 82.5 Por ninguno 5 2 1.6 4.5 87.1 No sabe 6 3 3.2 9.3 96.4 No contestó 7 1 1.2 3.6 100.0 . 69 65.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 36 Missing cases 69 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 49 46.5 46.5 46.5 femenino 2 56 53.5 53.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 33 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 30 28.6 28.6 28.6 26-40 2 39 37.6 37.6 66.2 41-60 3 25 23.5 23.5 89.7 61 + 4 11 10.3 10.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INST Institución donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 54 51.8 51.8 51.8 gob fed 2 3 2.8 2.8 54.7 paraestatal 3 1 .6 .6 55.3 emp priv 4 20 19.2 19.2 74.5 negocio prop 5 7 6.2 6.2 80.7 independiente 6 20 19.3 19.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 33 31.7 61.1 61.1 estudiante 2 15 14.4 27.7 88.9 jubilado 3 2 1.8 3.5 92.4 desemp 4 4 3.9 7.6 100.0 0 51 48.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 54 Missing cases 51 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 34 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE ACTIV Rama de actividad económica Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent industria 2 3 2.5 5.2 5.2 comercio 3 11 10.1 20.9 26.1 construc 4 2 1.7 3.5 29.6 educación 5 1 1.3 2.8 32.4 otros servs 6 34 32.6 67.6 100.0 0 54 51.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 51 Missing cases 54 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUESTO Que puesto ocupa en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario, Patron o 1 5 4.6 9.6 9.6 Directivo o Func de 2 3 2.7 5.5 15.2 Contratista o trabaj 3 15 13.8 28.7 43.9 Profesionista Indepe 4 5 4.3 8.9 52.8 Emplea, trabaj, Obre 5 22 20.7 42.9 95.8 trabajador sin pago 6 2 2.0 4.2 100.0 0 54 51.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 51 Missing cases 54 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 35 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 1 .8 .8 .8 prim inc 2 5 4.8 4.8 5.6 prim comp 3 12 11.7 11.7 17.3 sec incom 4 4 3.7 3.7 21.0 sec comp 5 14 13.7 13.7 34.7 prep incom 6 7 7.1 7.1 41.9 prep comp 7 25 24.2 24.2 66.1 univ incom 8 16 14.9 14.9 81.0 univ comp + 9 20 19.0 19.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 3 3.0 3.0 3.0 1-3 sm 2 25 23.7 23.7 26.7 3-5 sm 3 14 13.6 13.6 40.3 5-7 sm 4 9 8.2 8.2 48.5 7-10 5 10 9.9 9.9 58.4 10 + SM 6 24 22.4 22.4 80.8 7 20 19.2 19.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 105 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 36 ROLLOVER (75) DF 9/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/9/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL7DF.FRE This procedure was completed at 20:10:43 End of Include file.