The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 1778 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 6606 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 825 Value Labels for each Variable. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST ESTADO ESTADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGUASCALIENTES 1 17 1.0 1.0 1.0 BAJA CALIFORNIA SUR 3 53 3.0 3.0 4.0 COLIMA 6 67 3.8 3.8 7.7 CHIAPAS 7 21 1.2 1.2 8.9 CHIHUAHUA 8 50 2.8 2.8 11.8 DISTRITO FEDERAL 9 220 12.4 12.4 24.1 GUANAJUATO 11 62 3.5 3.5 27.6 GUERRERO 12 18 1.0 1.0 28.6 HUDALGO 13 64 3.6 3.6 32.2 JALISCO 14 56 3.2 3.2 35.3 MEXICO 15 269 15.1 15.1 50.5 MICHOACAN 16 73 4.1 4.1 54.6 NUEVO LEON 19 66 3.7 3.7 58.3 OAXACA 20 123 6.9 6.9 65.2 PUEBLA 21 75 4.2 4.2 69.4 QUERETARO 22 38 2.1 2.1 71.6 SONORA 26 18 1.0 1.0 72.6 TABASCO 27 64 3.6 3.6 76.2 TAMAULIPAS 28 113 6.4 6.4 82.5 TLAXCALA 29 104 5.9 5.9 88.4 VERACRUZ 30 188 10.6 10.6 99.0 YUCATAN 31 18 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1 ¿CUAL ES EL NOTICIERO QUE VE MAS? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EL NOTICIERO CON G. 1 668 37.6 37.6 37.6 HECHOS 2 537 30.2 30.2 67.8 OTRO 3 311 17.5 17.5 85.3 NINGUNO 4 248 14.0 14.0 99.2 NS 5 9 .5 .5 99.8 NC 6 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST MALVSRIE ¿CON CUAL DICHO SE IDENTIFICA MAS? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAS VALE MALO X CONO 1 547 30.8 30.8 30.8 EL QUE NO ARRIESGA N 2 976 54.9 54.9 85.6 NINGUNA DE LAS ANTER 3 84 4.7 4.7 90.4 AMBOS 4 77 4.3 4.3 94.7 NS 5 85 4.8 4.8 99.5 NC 6 8 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PCAM ¿CAMARAS QUE TIENE CONGRESO DE MEXICO? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DIPUTADOS Y SENADORE 1 630 35.4 35.4 35.4 DIPUTDOS 2 141 7.9 7.9 43.3 SENADORES 3 19 1.1 1.1 44.4 OTRO 4 47 2.6 2.6 47.1 NS 5 936 52.7 52.7 99.7 NC 6 5 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST P4 ¿QUIEN LE GUSTARIA COMO PROX/PDTE MEXICO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VICENTE FOX 1 534 30.0 30.0 30.0 FRANCISCO LABASTIDA 2 519 29.2 29.2 59.2 CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 3 145 8.1 8.1 67.4 PORFIRIO MUÑOZ LEDO 4 7 .4 .4 67.7 MANUAL CAMACHO SOLIS 5 2 .1 .1 67.8 GILBERTO RINCON GALL 6 0 .0 .0 67.9 NINGUNO 7 187 10.5 10.5 78.4 OTRO 10 5 .3 .3 78.6 ROBERTO MADRAZO 11 9 .5 .5 79.1 DIEGO FERNANDEZ DE C 12 0 .0 .0 79.2 JESUS SILVA HERZOG 13 2 .1 .1 79.3 INSUF ESPECIF 97 6 .3 .3 79.6 NS 98 334 18.8 18.8 98.4 NC 99 28 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 CANDIDATO DEL PAN A LA PRESIDENCIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VICENTE FOX QUESADA 1 1298 73.0 73.0 73.0 OTRO 2 37 2.1 2.1 75.1 NS 3 434 24.4 24.4 99.5 NC 4 8 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST CONE1 HABIA OIDO HABLAR DE VICENTE FOX Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 357 20.1 74.3 74.3 NO 2 114 6.4 23.8 98.1 NS 3 9 .5 1.9 100.0 0 1298 73.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 480 Missing cases 1298 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6 CANDIDATO DEL PRI A LA PRESIDENCIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FRANCISCO LABASTIDA 1 1454 81.8 81.8 81.8 OTRO 2 34 1.9 1.9 83.7 NS 3 285 16.0 16.0 99.7 NC 4 5 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONE2 HABIA OIDO HABLAR DE FCO LABASTIDA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 252 14.2 77.7 77.7 NO 2 62 3.5 19.2 96.9 NS 3 4 .2 1.3 98.2 NC 4 6 .3 1.8 100.0 0 1454 81.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 324 Missing cases 1454 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST P7 CANDIDATO DEL PRD A LA PRESIDENCIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 1 1257 70.7 70.7 70.7 OTRO 2 35 2.0 2.0 72.7 NS 3 476 26.8 26.8 99.5 NC 4 9 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONE3 HABIA OIDO HABLAR DE C. CARDENAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 421 23.7 81.0 81.0 NO 2 82 4.6 15.8 96.7 NS 3 6 .4 1.2 98.0 NC 4 11 .6 2.0 100.0 0 1257 70.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 521 Missing cases 1257 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9 ¿QUE TAN SEGURO DE VOTAR X ESE PARTIDO? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOTALMENTE SEGURO 1 810 45.5 45.5 45.5 BASTANTE SEGURO 2 464 26.1 26.1 71.6 POCO SEGURO 3 250 14.1 14.1 85.7 NADA SEGURO 4 53 3.0 3.0 88.7 NS 5 160 9.0 9.0 97.7 NC 6 41 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST PACU ACUERDO COMO ESTA GOBERNANDO EL PDTE EZP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 719 40.4 40.4 40.4 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 378 21.2 21.2 61.7 DESACUERDO EN PARTE 3 127 7.1 7.1 68.8 DESACUERDO 4 487 27.4 27.4 96.2 NS 5 54 3.1 3.1 99.2 NC 6 13 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P11 ¿SIT/ECONOMICA DEL PAIS ACTUALMENTE? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 451 25.3 25.3 25.3 IGUAL DE BIEN 2 196 11.0 11.0 36.4 IGUAL DE MAL 3 302 17.0 17.0 53.4 PEOR 4 757 42.6 42.6 95.9 NS 5 60 3.4 3.4 99.3 NC 6 12 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST P12 PRINCIPAL RESPONSABLE SIT/ECO DEL PAIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTRO 10 14 .8 .8 .8 EL GOBIERNO 11 409 23.0 24.0 24.8 EL PRESIDENTE 12 555 31.2 32.6 57.4 EL PUEBLO 13 134 7.5 7.8 65.2 EL PRI 14 34 1.9 2.0 67.2 CARLOS SALINAS DE GO 15 120 6.7 7.0 74.2 LOS EMPRESARIOS 16 12 .7 .7 74.9 EL DESEMPLEO 17 3 .2 .2 75.1 LA INFLACION 18 5 .3 .3 75.4 FRANCISCO LABASTIDA 19 1 .1 .1 75.5 JOSE ANGUEL GURRIA 20 8 .4 .5 75.9 LOS GOBIERNOS ANTERI 21 20 1.1 1.2 77.1 LOS GOBERNANTES 22 41 2.3 2.4 79.5 LOS POLITICOS 23 11 .6 .6 80.1 AL SISTEMA ECONOMICO 24 9 .5 .5 80.7 LA CAMARA DE DIPUTAD 25 28 1.6 1.6 82.3 LA CORRUPCION 26 8 .4 .4 82.8 AL GABINETE DE ZEDIL 27 6 .4 .4 83.1 AL NARCOTRAFICO 28 1 .1 .1 83.2 A LAS PROXIMAS ELECC 29 4 .2 .2 83.4 A LOS DIRIGENTES 30 17 1.0 1.0 84.5 LOS PRESIDENTES 31 23 1.3 1.4 85.8 LOS PARTIDOS 32 6 .3 .3 86.2 LOS DESASTRES 33 2 .1 .1 86.3 AL EXTRANJERO 34 5 .3 .3 86.6 AL PETROLEO 35 4 .2 .2 86.8 AL PRD (GOB DEL D.F. 36 2 .1 .1 87.0 CONGRESO DE LA UNION 37 4 .2 .2 87.2 HAY MAS TRABAJO 38 3 .2 .2 87.4 CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 39 1 .1 .1 87.5 INSUF ESPECIF 97 14 .8 .8 88.2 NC 98 11 .6 .7 88.9 NS 99 189 10.6 11.1 100.0 0 73 4.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1705 Missing cases 73 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST EXCAM MAS IMPORTANTE EN EL PROXIMO PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXPER/PARA GOBERNAR 1 846 47.6 47.6 47.6 OPCION DE CAMBIO 2 796 44.8 44.8 92.4 NINGUNA 3 53 3.0 3.0 95.4 NS 4 71 4.0 4.0 99.4 NC 5 12 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P14 QUE HUBIERA HECHO DFC SI HUBIERA GANADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHO MAS 1 165 9.3 9.3 9.3 ALGO MAS 2 423 23.8 23.8 33.1 IGUAL 3 295 16.6 16.6 49.7 ALGO MENOS 4 184 10.3 10.3 60.0 MUCHO MENOS 5 214 12.0 12.0 72.0 NS 6 483 27.2 27.2 99.2 NC 7 14 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDIP ¿CUANTO DURA UN DIPUTADO EN SU PUESTO? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 3 AÑOS 1 666 37.5 37.5 37.5 OTRO 2 416 23.4 23.4 60.8 NS 3 680 38.3 38.3 99.1 NC 4 16 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST P16 QUE HUBIERA HECHO CCS SI HUBIERA GANADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHO MAS 1 130 7.3 7.3 7.3 ALGO MAS 2 257 14.5 14.5 21.8 IGUAL 3 258 14.5 14.5 36.3 ALGO MENOS 4 261 14.7 14.7 51.0 MUCHO MENOS 5 526 29.6 29.6 80.6 NS 6 340 19.1 19.1 99.7 NC 7 6 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INDEPAR SE CONSIDERA PANISTA PRIISTA PERREDISTA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PANISTA 1 347 19.5 19.5 19.5 PRIISTA 2 584 32.8 32.8 52.4 PERREDISTA 3 189 10.6 10.6 63.0 DE OTRO PARTIDO 4 16 .9 .9 63.9 NO SE IDENTIFICA CON 5 608 34.2 34.2 98.1 NC 6 35 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST P18 QUE TANTO CREE HARIA VFQ MEJORAR SIT/PAI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHO MAS 1 315 17.7 17.7 17.7 ALGO MAS 2 586 32.9 32.9 50.7 IGUAL 3 170 9.6 9.6 60.2 ALGO MENOS 4 227 12.8 12.8 73.0 MUCHO MENOS 5 172 9.6 9.6 82.6 NS 6 307 17.3 17.3 99.9 NC 7 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P18_A QUE TAN SEGURO VFQ HARA MUCHO MAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOTALMENTE 1 185 10.4 58.6 58.6 BASTANTE 2 101 5.7 32.1 90.7 REGULAR 3 13 .7 4.2 94.8 POCO 4 14 .8 4.5 99.3 NADA 5 2 .1 .6 99.9 NC 7 0 .0 .1 100.0 0 1463 82.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 315 Missing cases 1463 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST P18_B QUE TAN SEGURO VFQ HARA ALGO MAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOTALMENTE 1 156 8.8 26.6 26.6 BASTANTE 2 205 11.5 34.9 61.5 REGULAR 3 83 4.7 14.1 75.7 POCO 4 128 7.2 21.8 97.5 NADA 5 4 .2 .7 98.2 NS 6 11 .6 1.8 100.0 0 1192 67.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 586 Missing cases 1192 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P18_C QUE TAN SEGURO VFQ HARA IGUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOTALMENTE 1 62 3.5 36.3 36.3 BASTANTE 2 55 3.1 32.2 68.5 REGULAR 3 21 1.2 12.6 81.1 POCO 4 22 1.3 13.2 94.3 NADA 5 4 .2 2.3 96.7 NS 6 5 .3 2.8 99.5 NC 7 1 .0 .5 100.0 0 1608 90.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 170 Missing cases 1608 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST P18_D QUE TAN SEGURO VFQ HARA ALGO MENOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOTALMENTE 1 66 3.7 29.1 29.1 BASTANTE 2 77 4.3 33.8 62.9 REGULAR 3 24 1.3 10.6 73.4 POCO 4 49 2.7 21.5 94.9 NADA 5 8 .4 3.4 98.3 NS 6 4 .2 1.7 100.0 0 1551 87.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 227 Missing cases 1551 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P18_E QUE TAN SEGURO VFQ HARA MUCHO MENOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOTALMENTE 1 99 5.6 57.8 57.8 BASTANTE 2 43 2.4 25.3 83.1 REGULAR 3 8 .5 4.8 87.9 POCO 4 12 .6 6.7 94.6 NADA 5 5 .3 3.1 97.7 NS 6 4 .2 2.3 100.0 0 1606 90.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 172 Missing cases 1606 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST COSTUVOT ¿CUAL SE ACERCA MAS A LO QUE PIENSA? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SIEMPRE VOTA POR EL 1 902 50.7 50.7 50.7 A VECES VOTA POR UNO 2 634 35.7 35.7 86.4 NINGUNA DE LAS DOS 3 174 9.8 9.8 96.2 NS 4 36 2.0 2.0 98.2 NC 5 32 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P20 QUE TANTO CREE HARIA FLO MEJORAR SIT/PAI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHO MAS 1 235 13.2 13.2 13.2 ALGO MAS 2 514 28.9 28.9 42.2 IGUAL 3 418 23.5 23.5 65.7 ALGO MENOS 4 188 10.6 10.6 76.2 MUCHO MENOS 5 205 11.5 11.5 87.8 NS 6 214 12.0 12.0 99.8 NC 7 3 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST P20_A QUE TAN SEGURO FLO HARA MUCHO MAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOTALMENTE 1 152 8.6 64.6 64.6 BASTANTE 2 59 3.3 24.9 89.5 REGULAR 3 13 .7 5.5 95.0 POCO 4 8 .4 3.3 98.2 NADA 5 4 .2 1.8 100.0 0 1543 86.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 235 Missing cases 1543 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P20_B QUE TAN SEGURO FLO HARA ALGO MAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOTALMENTE 1 150 8.5 29.3 29.3 BASTANTE 2 195 11.0 38.0 67.3 REGULAR 3 54 3.0 10.5 77.7 POCO 4 93 5.3 18.2 95.9 NADA 5 11 .6 2.1 98.0 NS 6 9 .5 1.8 99.8 NC 7 1 .1 .2 100.0 0 1264 71.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 514 Missing cases 1264 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST P20_C QUE TAN SEGURO FLO HARA IGUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOTALMENTE 1 172 9.7 41.2 41.2 BASTANTE 2 156 8.8 37.4 78.6 REGULAR 3 39 2.2 9.5 88.0 POCO 4 34 1.9 8.2 96.2 NADA 5 5 .3 1.1 97.3 NS 6 10 .6 2.4 99.7 NC 7 1 .1 .3 100.0 0 1360 76.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 418 Missing cases 1360 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P20_D QUE TAN SEGURO FLO HARA ALGO MENOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOTALMENTE 1 60 3.4 32.1 32.1 BASTANTE 2 63 3.6 33.6 65.6 REGULAR 3 24 1.4 12.9 78.5 POCO 4 31 1.8 16.7 95.2 NADA 5 3 .1 1.4 96.6 NS 6 6 .3 3.1 99.7 NC 7 1 .0 .3 100.0 0 1590 89.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 188 Missing cases 1590 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST P20_E QUE TAN SEGURO FLO HARA MUCHO MENOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOTALMENTE 1 123 6.9 59.9 59.9 BASTANTE 2 52 2.9 25.5 85.4 REGULAR 3 9 .5 4.5 89.9 POCO 4 6 .3 2.8 92.6 NADA 5 12 .7 5.7 98.4 NS 6 2 .1 .9 99.3 NC 7 1 .1 .7 100.0 0 1573 88.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 205 Missing cases 1573 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST PGOB NOMBRE DEL ACTUAL GOBERNADOR DE SU EDO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 10 30 1.7 1.7 1.7 11 135 7.6 7.6 9.3 12 16 .9 .9 10.1 13 117 6.6 6.6 16.7 14 19 1.1 1.1 17.8 15 3 .2 .2 18.0 16 7 .4 .4 18.4 17 69 3.9 3.9 22.3 18 53 3.0 3.0 25.3 19 60 3.4 3.4 28.7 20 8 .5 .5 29.1 21 7 .4 .4 29.5 22 66 3.7 3.7 33.3 23 2 .1 .1 33.4 24 26 1.4 1.4 34.8 25 6 .3 .3 35.2 26 49 2.8 2.8 37.9 27 28 1.6 1.6 39.5 28 3 .1 .1 39.7 29 9 .5 .5 40.1 30 9 .5 .5 40.7 31 5 .3 .3 41.0 32 18 1.0 1.0 42.0 33 10 .6 .6 42.6 34 3 .2 .2 42.7 35 110 6.2 6.2 48.9 36 51 2.9 2.9 51.8 37 48 2.7 2.7 54.4 38 1 .0 .0 54.5 39 10 .5 .5 55.0 40 81 4.5 4.5 59.6 41 8 .5 .5 60.0 42 43 2.4 2.4 62.5 43 31 1.8 1.8 64.2 44 11 .6 .6 64.8 45 1 .0 .0 64.9 51 0 .0 .0 64.9 52 2 .1 .1 65.0 54 2 .1 .1 65.1 69 0 .0 .0 65.1 97 5 .3 .3 65.4 98 45 2.5 2.5 68.0 99 569 32.0 32.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST P22 QUE TANTO CREE HARIA CCS MEJORAR SIT/PAI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHO MAS 1 167 9.4 9.4 9.4 ALGO MAS 2 219 12.3 12.3 21.7 IGUAL 3 188 10.5 10.5 32.2 ALGO MENOS 4 295 16.6 16.6 48.9 MUCHO MENOS 5 624 35.1 35.1 83.9 NS 6 281 15.8 15.8 99.7 NC 7 5 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P22_A QUE TAN SEGURO CCS HARA MUCHO MAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOTALMENTE 1 106 5.9 63.3 63.3 BASTANTE 2 40 2.2 23.8 87.1 REGULAR 3 6 .3 3.5 90.6 POCO 4 11 .6 6.4 97.0 NADA 5 2 .1 1.2 98.2 NS 6 2 .1 1.2 99.4 NC 7 1 .1 .6 100.0 0 1611 90.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 167 Missing cases 1611 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST P22_B QUE TAN SEGURO CCS HARA ALGO MAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOTALMENTE 1 51 2.9 23.4 23.4 BASTANTE 2 75 4.2 34.4 57.9 REGULAR 3 26 1.5 12.0 69.9 POCO 4 62 3.5 28.1 98.1 NADA 5 2 .1 1.1 99.1 NS 6 1 .1 .4 99.5 NC 7 1 .1 .5 100.0 0 1559 87.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 219 Missing cases 1559 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P22_C QUE TAN SEGURO CCS HARA IGUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOTALMENTE 1 55 3.1 29.1 29.1 BASTANTE 2 68 3.8 36.2 65.4 REGULAR 3 34 1.9 18.4 83.8 POCO 4 24 1.3 12.8 96.5 NADA 5 1 .1 .5 97.1 NS 6 3 .2 1.8 98.9 NC 7 2 .1 1.1 100.0 0 1591 89.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 187 Missing cases 1591 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST P22_D QUE TAN SEGURO CCS HARA ALGO MENOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOTALMENTE 1 78 4.4 26.5 26.5 BASTANTE 2 105 5.9 35.7 62.1 REGULAR 3 31 1.7 10.5 72.6 POCO 4 72 4.1 24.4 97.0 NADA 5 3 .2 .9 97.9 NS 6 6 .3 2.1 100.0 0 1483 83.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 295 Missing cases 1483 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P22_E QUE TAN SEGURO CCS HARA MUCHO MENOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOTALMENTE 1 394 22.2 63.2 63.2 BASTANTE 2 151 8.5 24.2 87.4 REGULAR 3 28 1.6 4.6 92.0 POCO 4 17 1.0 2.8 94.8 NADA 5 24 1.4 3.9 98.7 NS 6 7 .4 1.1 99.8 NC 7 1 .1 .2 100.0 0 1154 64.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 624 Missing cases 1154 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST P23 TIENE CREDENCIAL PARA VOTAR CON FOTOGRAF Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 1687 94.9 94.9 94.9 NO 2 86 4.8 4.8 99.8 NC 3 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P24 VOTO EN LAS ELECCIONES DE 1994 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VOTO 1 1225 68.9 68.9 68.9 NO VOTO 2 352 19.8 19.8 88.7 NO ME ACUERDO 3 47 2.6 2.6 91.4 NO TENIA EDAD 4 149 8.4 8.4 99.7 NC 5 5 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P25 Y VOTO EN LAS ELECCIONES DE 1997 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VOTO 1 1121 63.1 63.1 63.1 NO VOTO 2 466 26.2 26.2 89.3 NO ME ACUERDO 3 86 4.8 4.8 94.1 NO TENIA EDAD 4 101 5.7 5.7 99.8 NC 5 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST P26 QUE TAN PROBABLE VOTE EN ELEC PARA PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOTALMENTE PROBABLE 1 1023 57.5 57.5 57.5 BASTANTE PROBABLE 2 425 23.9 23.9 81.4 MEDIO PROBABLE 3 142 8.0 8.0 89.4 POCO PROBABLE 4 94 5.3 5.3 94.7 NADA PROBABLE 5 57 3.2 3.2 97.9 NS 6 34 1.9 1.9 99.8 NC 7 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_1 VOTOS: ALIANZA POR EL CAMBIO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1007 56.6 56.6 56.6 UNO 1 92 5.2 5.2 61.8 DOS 2 111 6.2 6.2 68.1 TRES 3 116 6.5 6.5 74.6 CUATRO 4 29 1.6 1.6 76.2 CINCO 5 423 23.8 23.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 32 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST PVOT_2 VOTOS: PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 942 53.0 53.0 53.0 UNO 1 98 5.5 5.5 58.5 DOS 2 117 6.6 6.6 65.0 TRES 3 74 4.1 4.1 69.2 CUATRO 4 21 1.2 1.2 70.4 CINCO 5 527 29.6 29.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_3 VOTOS: ALIANZA POR MEXICO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1430 80.4 80.4 80.4 UNO 1 96 5.4 5.4 85.8 DOS 2 59 3.3 3.3 89.1 TRES 3 31 1.7 1.7 90.8 CUATRO 4 5 .3 .3 91.1 CINCO 5 157 8.9 8.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_4 VOTOS: PDS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1734 97.5 97.5 97.5 UNO 1 40 2.2 2.2 99.7 DOS 2 5 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 33 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST PVOT_5 VOTOS: PCD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1729 97.3 97.3 97.3 UNO 1 45 2.5 2.5 99.8 DOS 2 2 .1 .1 99.9 TRES 3 1 .1 .1 100.0 CINCO 5 1 .0 .0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_6 VOTOS: PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1710 96.2 96.2 96.2 UNO 1 41 2.3 2.3 98.5 DOS 2 10 .6 .6 99.1 TRES 3 3 .2 .2 99.2 CINCO 5 14 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_7 VOTOS: NS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1619 91.1 91.1 91.1 UNO 1 2 .1 .1 91.2 DOS 2 11 .6 .6 91.8 CUATRO 4 1 .0 .0 91.8 CINCO 5 146 8.2 8.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 34 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST PVOT_8 VOTOS: NC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1752 98.6 98.6 98.6 CINCO 5 26 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_9 VOTOS: ABSTENCION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1677 94.3 94.3 94.3 UNO 1 3 .1 .1 94.5 DOS 2 3 .1 .1 94.6 CINCO 5 96 5.4 5.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 35 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST P28 CUANDO DECIDE X VOTAR ¿QUE LE IMPORTA +? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent QUE TENGA EXPERIENCI 1 1118 62.9 62.9 62.9 LO QUE OFRECIO DURAN 2 486 27.3 27.3 90.3 NINGUNO 3 52 2.9 2.9 93.2 OTRO 10 2 .1 .1 93.3 AMBAS 11 38 2.2 2.2 95.4 QUE SEA MEJOR 12 5 .3 .3 95.7 SU TRAYECTORIA 13 6 .3 .3 96.0 SIEMPRE VOTO POR EL 14 1 .0 .0 96.1 QUE CUMPLA SUS PROME 15 12 .7 .7 96.7 QUE TENGAS GANAS DE 16 4 .2 .2 96.9 QUE SEA HONRADO 17 4 .2 .2 97.2 NS 98 37 2.1 2.1 99.3 NC 99 13 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE HOY ELE PDTE ¿X CUAL CANDIDATO VOTARIA? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 599 33.7 33.7 33.7 PRI 2 636 35.8 35.8 69.5 PARM 6 12 .7 .7 70.2 NINGUNO 11 104 5.8 5.8 76.0 NS 12 149 8.4 8.4 84.4 NC-BLANCO 13 63 3.5 3.5 87.9 ANULADO 14 8 .5 .5 88.4 COALICION PRD-PT-PAS 15 200 11.3 11.3 99.6 PCD 16 4 .2 .2 99.8 DEMOCRACIA SOCIAL 17 2 .1 .1 99.9 20 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 36 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 857 48.2 48.2 48.2 femenino 2 921 51.8 51.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 517 29.1 29.1 29.1 26-40 2 663 37.3 37.3 66.4 41-60 3 423 23.8 23.8 90.1 61 + 4 170 9.6 9.6 99.7 Ns/Nc 99 5 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESCOL Escolaridad entrevistado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 94 5.3 5.3 5.3 prim inc 2 233 13.1 13.1 18.4 prim comp 3 348 19.6 19.6 37.9 Sec incompleta 4 104 5.9 5.9 43.8 sec completa 5 335 18.8 18.8 62.6 Prepa incompleta 6 140 7.9 7.9 70.5 Prepa Completa 7 231 13.0 13.0 83.5 Universidad incomple 8 124 7.0 7.0 90.5 Universidad Completa 9 170 9.5 9.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 37 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST SE4 Actividad la semana pasada... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Trabajó 1 945 53.2 53.2 53.2 Vacaciones (incap) 2 17 1.0 1.0 54.1 Ama de casa 3 569 32.0 32.0 86.1 Estudiante 4 147 8.2 8.2 94.4 Jubilado/Pensionado 5 43 2.4 2.4 96.8 Desempleado 6 43 2.4 2.4 99.2 Incapacitado Permane 7 7 .4 .4 99.6 Otro 10 0 .0 .0 99.7 14 2 .1 .1 99.7 17 1 .1 .1 99.8 20 1 .1 .1 99.9 41 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE7 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1778 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1778 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE12 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1778 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1778 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 38 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST SE13 Actividad de la empresa donde trabaja... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Agricultura 1 128 7.2 13.2 13.2 Pesca 2 21 1.2 2.2 15.4 Industrias 3 138 7.7 14.2 29.6 Comercio 4 253 14.2 26.1 55.7 Construccion 5 54 3.0 5.6 61.3 Educacion 6 65 3.7 6.7 68.0 Servicios 7 304 17.1 31.3 99.4 Otro 8 3 .2 .3 99.6 Ns/Nc 9 4 .2 .4 100.0 0 809 45.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 969 Missing cases 809 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INGRE Rango ingreso familiar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 398 22.4 22.4 22.4 1-3 sm 2 673 37.9 37.9 60.3 3-5 sm 3 285 16.0 16.0 76.3 5-7 sm 4 128 7.2 7.2 83.5 7-10 sm 5 83 4.6 4.6 88.1 10-30 sm 6 68 3.9 3.9 92.0 30 + SM 7 21 1.2 1.2 93.1 Ns/Nc 8 122 6.9 6.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 39 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST SE16 Cuantas personas dependen de ingr famili Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 72 4.0 4.0 4.0 2-3 2 555 31.2 31.2 35.2 4-5 3 759 42.7 42.7 77.9 6 o MAS 4 372 20.9 20.9 98.9 NC 98 18 1.0 1.0 99.9 NS 99 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE17 Tiene telefono en su casa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 799 44.9 44.9 44.9 No 2 974 54.8 54.8 99.8 Nc 3 4 .2 .2 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1778 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1777 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 40 PRE-ELECTORAL NACIONAL (NAL) FEB/99 CAMPO 2/28/ 0 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN (NAL10200) FRECPOND.LST This procedure was completed at 18:55:25 End of Include file.