The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 999 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 6054 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 756 Value Labels for each Variable. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 TAMAULIPAS II MAYO/98 5/20/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM20598) FRECPOND.LST ESTADO ESTADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TAMAULIPAS 28 999 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MUN MUNICIPIOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ALDAMA 2 18 1.8 1.8 1.8 ALTAMIRA 3 66 6.7 6.7 8.5 CIUDAD MADERO 9 80 8.0 8.0 16.5 CRUILLAS 10 58 5.8 5.8 22.2 MANTE 21 63 6.3 6.3 28.5 MATAMOROS 22 139 13.9 13.9 42.5 NVO. LAREDO 27 92 9.2 9.2 51.7 REYNOSA 32 45 4.5 4.5 56.2 RIO BRAVO 33 143 14.3 14.3 70.5 TAMPICO 38 109 10.9 10.9 81.4 VALLE HERMOSO 40 51 5.1 5.1 86.5 VICTORIA 41 135 13.5 13.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 TAMAULIPAS II MAYO/98 5/20/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM20598) FRECPOND.LST ESTRATO ESTRATO SOCIAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUY BAJA 1 33 3.3 3.3 3.3 BAJA 2 355 35.5 35.5 38.8 ALTA 3 236 23.6 23.6 62.4 MUY ALTA 4 209 20.9 20.9 83.3 RURAL 7 167 16.7 16.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MALVSRIE ¿Con cual dicho se identif mas? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mas vale malo x .. 1 352 35.2 35.2 35.2 El que no arriesga.. 2 445 44.5 44.5 79.7 Ninguna de las anter 3 42 4.2 4.2 84.0 ambos 4 58 5.8 5.8 89.8 N/S 5 79 7.9 7.9 97.7 N/C 6 23 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 Le gusta hacer cosas emocionantes? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 469 46.9 46.9 46.9 A veces 2 142 14.2 14.2 61.2 No 3 373 37.3 37.3 98.5 N/S 4 11 1.1 1.1 99.6 N/C 5 4 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 TAMAULIPAS II MAYO/98 5/20/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM20598) FRECPOND.LST P3 Quien le gustaria fuera prox gob? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTROS 10 3 .3 .3 .3 MARCO ANTONIO BERNAL 11 103 10.3 10.3 10.6 ANTONIO SANCHEZ GOCH 12 39 3.9 3.9 14.5 TOMAS YARRINGTON RUV 13 205 20.5 20.5 35.0 JOAQUIN HERNANDEZ CO 14 9 .9 .9 35.9 GUSTAVO CARDENAS GUT 15 30 3.0 3.0 38.9 JUAN ANTONIO GUAJARD 16 12 1.2 1.2 40.2 CARLOS RODRIGUEZ 17 1 .1 .1 40.3 OSCAR LUEBBERT 18 31 3.1 3.1 43.4 RAMON SAMPAYO 19 1 .1 .1 43.5 DIEGO ALONSO HINOJOS 20 1 .1 .1 43.6 JOAQUIN CONTRERAS 21 1 .1 .1 43.6 JAVIER BARCENAS DE L 22 1 .1 .1 43.7 GENARO DE LA PORTILL 23 1 .1 .1 43.8 ANTONIO MARTINEZ TOR 24 4 .4 .4 44.2 HORACIO GARZA 25 2 .2 .2 44.3 JORGE CARDENAS 26 1 .1 .1 44.4 INSUF ESPECIFIC 97 13 1.3 1.3 45.8 N/C 98 34 3.4 3.4 49.1 N/S 99 508 50.9 50.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 Sabe como eligira PRI cand a gob? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 379 38.0 38.0 38.0 No 2 613 61.4 61.4 99.3 N/C 3 7 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 TAMAULIPAS II MAYO/98 5/20/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM20598) FRECPOND.LST P5A ¿Como? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTROS 10 1 .1 .3 .3 POR VOTACION 11 279 28.0 73.7 73.9 ELECCIONES INTERNAS 12 27 2.8 7.2 81.2 CONSULTA A LA BASE 13 18 1.8 4.8 86.0 DEMOCRATICAMENTE 14 13 1.3 3.5 89.5 POR DEDAZO 15 7 .7 1.9 91.4 INSUF ESPECIFIC 97 9 .9 2.3 93.7 N/C 98 14 1.4 3.7 97.4 N/S 99 10 1.0 2.6 100.0 0 620 62.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 379 Missing cases 620 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6 Enterado PRI elige cand x vot ciud? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 656 65.6 65.6 65.6 No 2 338 33.9 33.9 99.5 N/C 3 5 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7 Ha desp algun interes esta elec del PRI? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 375 37.5 37.5 37.5 No 2 585 58.6 58.6 96.1 N/S 3 35 3.5 3.5 99.6 N/C 4 4 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 TAMAULIPAS II MAYO/98 5/20/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM20598) FRECPOND.LST P7_1 ¿Que tanto? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Muchisimo 1 107 10.7 28.7 28.7 Mucho 2 168 16.9 45.0 73.6 Poco 3 85 8.5 22.6 96.3 Muy poco 4 9 .9 2.3 98.6 N/S 5 5 .5 1.4 100.0 0 624 62.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 375 Missing cases 624 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8 Piensa votar en la elecc cand del PRI? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 626 62.7 62.7 62.7 No 2 282 28.2 28.2 90.9 N/S 3 86 8.6 8.6 99.5 N/C 4 5 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8_1 Que tan probable que vote en esa elecc? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Muy probable 1 430 43.0 68.7 68.7 Poco probable 2 159 15.9 25.4 94.1 Nada Probable 3 22 2.2 3.5 97.6 N/S 4 11 1.1 1.8 99.3 N/C 5 4 .4 .7 100.0 0 373 37.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 626 Missing cases 373 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 TAMAULIPAS II MAYO/98 5/20/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM20598) FRECPOND.LST CONRCA21 Ha oido hablar de Marco Antonio Bernal? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent No 1 268 26.9 26.9 26.9 N/C 2 4 .4 .4 27.2 Si 3 727 72.8 72.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA22 Ha oido hablar de Antonio Sanchez Goch? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent No 1 427 42.7 42.7 42.7 N/C 2 2 .2 .2 42.9 Si 3 571 57.1 57.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA23 Ha oido hablar de Oscar Luebbert? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent No 1 501 50.1 50.1 50.1 N/C 2 2 .2 .2 50.3 Si 3 497 49.7 49.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 TAMAULIPAS II MAYO/98 5/20/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM20598) FRECPOND.LST CONRCA24 Ha oido hablar de Tomas Yarrington R.? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent No 1 243 24.4 24.4 24.4 N/C 2 5 .5 .5 24.9 Si 3 750 75.1 75.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI21 ¿Que opinion tiene de MAB? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Buena 1 309 31.0 42.5 42.5 Regular 2 160 16.0 22.0 64.5 Mala 3 23 2.3 3.2 67.7 NS/NC 4 235 23.5 32.3 100.0 0 272 27.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 727 Missing cases 272 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI22 ¿Que opinion tiene de ASG? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Buena 1 199 19.9 34.8 34.8 Regular 2 123 12.3 21.6 56.4 Mala 3 34 3.4 5.9 62.3 NS/NC 4 215 21.5 37.7 100.0 0 428 42.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 428 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 TAMAULIPAS II MAYO/98 5/20/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM20598) FRECPOND.LST CANOPI23 ¿Que opinion tiene de OL? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Buena 1 196 19.6 39.4 39.4 Regular 2 96 9.6 19.4 58.8 Mala 3 26 2.6 5.3 64.1 NS/NC 4 178 17.8 35.9 100.0 0 502 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 497 Missing cases 502 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI24 ¿Que opinion tiene de TYR? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Buena 1 459 45.9 61.1 61.1 Regular 2 68 6.8 9.0 70.2 Mala 3 48 4.8 6.3 76.5 NS/NC 4 176 17.6 23.5 100.0 0 249 24.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 750 Missing cases 249 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 TAMAULIPAS II MAYO/98 5/20/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM20598) FRECPOND.LST P9B ¿Por que? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTROS 10 5 .5 4.4 4.4 CORRUPTO 11 10 1.0 8.7 13.1 NARCOTRAFICANTE 12 6 .6 5.0 18.1 MALOS MANEJOS DINERO 13 4 .4 3.6 21.7 NO AYUDA AL PUEBLO 14 9 .9 8.0 29.7 NO LO CONOCE BIEN 15 20 2.0 17.6 47.4 PORQUE LO IMPUSIERON 16 4 .4 3.2 50.6 TIENE PARTICIP C/PUE 17 1 .1 1.1 51.7 TIENE MALA FAMA 18 10 1.0 8.9 60.7 PORQUE ES JOVEN 19 2 .2 1.8 62.4 NO CUMPLE LO QUE PRO 20 14 1.4 11.7 74.1 INSUF ESPECIFIC 97 11 1.1 9.3 83.4 N/C 98 5 .5 4.3 87.7 N/S 99 14 1.4 12.3 100.0 0 884 88.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 115 Missing cases 884 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P10 ¿Por quien votaria para cand del PRI? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Antonio Sanchez G 1 83 8.3 8.3 8.3 Marco Antonio B 2 151 15.2 15.2 23.5 Tomas Yarringon R 3 310 31.0 31.0 54.5 Oscar Luebbert 4 62 6.2 6.2 60.7 No los conoc lo sufi 5 212 21.2 21.2 82.0 Ninguno 6 117 11.7 11.7 93.7 N/S 7 55 5.5 5.5 99.2 N/C 8 8 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 TAMAULIPAS II MAYO/98 5/20/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM20598) FRECPOND.LST P11 Que tan seguro esta de vot por ese cand? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Totalmente seguro 1 215 21.5 35.4 35.4 Bastante seguro 2 247 24.7 40.7 76.1 Poco seguro 3 113 11.3 18.7 94.8 Nada seguro 4 13 1.3 2.1 96.9 No va a votar 5 8 .8 1.3 98.2 N/S 6 10 1.0 1.6 99.8 N/C 7 1 .1 .2 100.0 0 393 39.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 606 Missing cases 393 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PACUG Esta acdo como MCL esta gob el edo? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Acuerdo 1 583 58.4 58.4 58.4 Acuerdo en parte 2 135 13.5 13.5 71.8 Desacuerdo en parte 3 29 2.9 2.9 74.8 Desacuerdo 4 188 18.8 18.8 93.5 N/S 5 60 6.0 6.0 99.5 N/C 6 5 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 TAMAULIPAS II MAYO/98 5/20/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM20598) FRECPOND.LST P13_1 Quien ha hecho + su carr pol en Tam? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Bernal 1 122 12.3 12.3 12.3 Luebbert 2 45 4.5 4.5 16.8 Yarringon 3 285 28.5 28.5 45.3 Sanchez Gochicoa 4 70 7.0 7.0 52.2 Ninguno 5 43 4.3 4.3 56.6 N/S 6 427 42.8 42.8 99.4 N/C 7 6 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P13_2 Quien ha hecho + carr pol fuera Tam? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Bernal 1 125 12.5 12.5 12.5 Luebbert 2 25 2.5 2.5 15.1 Yarringon 3 95 9.5 9.5 24.5 Sanchez Gochicoa 4 35 3.5 3.5 28.0 Ninguno 5 33 3.3 3.3 31.3 N/S 6 672 67.3 67.3 98.6 N/C 7 14 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 TAMAULIPAS II MAYO/98 5/20/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM20598) FRECPOND.LST P13_3 Quien tiene + cercania con el pueblo? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Bernal 1 135 13.5 13.5 13.5 Luebbert 2 61 6.1 6.1 19.6 Yarringon 3 306 30.6 30.6 50.2 Sanchez Gochicoa 4 65 6.5 6.5 56.7 Ninguno 5 67 6.7 6.7 63.4 N/S 6 353 35.3 35.3 98.7 N/C 7 13 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P13_4 Quien tiene mayor trayectoria politica? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Bernal 1 133 13.4 13.4 13.4 Luebbert 2 32 3.2 3.2 16.6 Yarringon 3 235 23.5 23.5 40.1 Sanchez Gochicoa 4 65 6.5 6.5 46.7 Ninguno 5 27 2.7 2.7 49.4 N/S 6 494 49.5 49.5 98.8 N/C 7 12 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 TAMAULIPAS II MAYO/98 5/20/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM20598) FRECPOND.LST P13_5 Quien esta mas preparado? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Bernal 1 123 12.3 12.3 12.3 Luebbert 2 32 3.2 3.2 15.5 Yarringon 3 246 24.7 24.7 40.1 Sanchez Gochicoa 4 56 5.6 5.6 45.7 Ninguno 5 51 5.1 5.1 50.8 N/S 6 470 47.1 47.1 97.9 N/C 7 21 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PACU Esta acdo con manera gob pdte EZP? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Acuerdo 1 598 59.9 59.9 59.9 Acuerdo en parte 2 165 16.5 16.5 76.4 Desacuerdo en parte 3 22 2.2 2.2 78.6 Desacuerdo 4 153 15.3 15.3 93.8 N/S 5 58 5.8 5.8 99.7 N/C 6 3 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P15 A visto algun anuncio de precand del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 815 81.6 81.6 81.6 No 2 180 18.0 18.0 99.6 N/S 3 4 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 TAMAULIPAS II MAYO/98 5/20/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM20598) FRECPOND.LST P15_1 De Antonio Sanchez Gochicoa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si mencion 1 420 42.1 51.5 51.5 No mencion 2 395 39.6 48.5 100.0 0 184 18.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 815 Missing cases 184 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P15_2 De Marco Antonio Bernal Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si mencion 1 524 52.5 64.3 64.3 No mencion 2 291 29.2 35.7 100.0 0 184 18.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 815 Missing cases 184 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P15_3 De Tomas Yarringon Ruvalcaba Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si mencion 1 636 63.6 78.0 78.0 No mencion 2 180 18.0 22.0 100.0 0 184 18.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 815 Missing cases 184 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 TAMAULIPAS II MAYO/98 5/20/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM20598) FRECPOND.LST P15_4 De Oscar Luebbert Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si mencion 1 327 32.8 40.1 40.1 No mencion 2 488 48.8 59.9 100.0 0 184 18.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 815 Missing cases 184 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P16 De cual precand le ha gustado + su publ? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Antonio Sanchez G 1 54 5.4 5.4 5.4 Marco Antonio B 2 141 14.1 14.1 19.5 Tomas Yarringon R 3 308 30.8 30.8 50.3 Oscar Luebbert 4 49 4.9 4.9 55.2 Ninguno 5 147 14.8 14.8 70.0 No ha visto publicid 6 144 14.4 14.4 84.5 N/S 7 136 13.6 13.6 98.1 N/C 8 19 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 477 47.7 47.7 47.7 femenino 2 522 52.3 52.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 TAMAULIPAS II MAYO/98 5/20/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM20598) FRECPOND.LST EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 306 30.6 30.6 30.6 26-40 2 344 34.4 34.4 65.0 41-60 3 244 24.4 24.4 89.4 61 + 4 106 10.6 10.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESCOL Escolaridad entrevistado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 46 4.7 4.7 4.7 prim inc 2 198 19.8 19.8 24.5 prim comp 3 195 19.5 19.5 44.0 Sec incompleta 4 67 6.7 6.7 50.7 sec completa 5 157 15.7 15.7 66.4 Prepa incompleta 6 57 5.7 5.7 72.1 Prepa Completa 7 130 13.0 13.0 85.1 Universidad incomple 8 53 5.3 5.3 90.4 Universidad Completa 9 96 9.6 9.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 TAMAULIPAS II MAYO/98 5/20/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM20598) FRECPOND.LST SE4 Actividad la semana pasada... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Trabajó 1 530 53.1 53.1 53.1 Vacaciones (incap) 2 4 .4 .4 53.5 Ama de casa 3 333 33.3 33.3 86.8 Estudiante 4 60 6.0 6.0 92.8 Jubilado/Pensionado 5 38 3.8 3.8 96.6 Desempleado 6 27 2.7 2.7 99.3 Incapacitado Permane 7 7 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE7 Que es usted en el lugar donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Dueño 1 62 6.2 11.5 11.5 Trabajador Independ 2 121 12.1 22.7 34.2 Directivo 3 14 1.4 2.6 36.8 Empleado 4 242 24.3 45.4 82.2 Obrero 5 48 4.8 9.1 91.2 Campesino 95 46 4.6 8.7 99.9 Nc 98 0 .0 .1 100.0 0 465 46.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 534 Missing cases 465 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 TAMAULIPAS II MAYO/98 5/20/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM20598) FRECPOND.LST SE12 Institución en donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent gob fed 1 57 5.7 11.6 11.6 paraestatal 2 11 1.1 2.2 13.8 emp priv 3 235 23.6 48.2 62.0 negocio prop 4 74 7.4 15.2 77.2 independiente 5 110 11.0 22.6 99.8 NC 6 1 .1 .2 100.0 0 511 51.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 488 Missing cases 511 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE13 Actividad de la empresa donde trabaja... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Agricultura 1 47 4.7 8.8 8.8 Pesca 2 6 .6 1.2 9.9 Industrias 3 102 10.2 19.1 29.0 Comercio 4 144 14.4 26.9 55.9 Construccion 5 30 3.0 5.6 61.5 Educacion 6 32 3.2 5.9 67.5 Servicios 7 173 17.4 32.5 99.9 Nc 8 0 .0 .1 100.0 0 465 46.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 534 Missing cases 465 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 TAMAULIPAS II MAYO/98 5/20/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM20598) FRECPOND.LST INGRE Rango ingreso familiar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 208 20.8 20.8 20.8 1-3 sm 2 449 44.9 44.9 65.7 3-5 sm 3 170 17.0 17.0 82.8 5-7 sm 4 51 5.1 5.1 87.8 7-10 5 30 3.0 3.0 90.9 10-30 SM 6 23 2.3 2.3 93.2 30 + SM 7 6 .6 .6 93.8 Ns/Nc 8 62 6.2 6.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE16 Cuantas personas dependen de ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 59 5.9 5.9 5.9 2-3 2 412 41.2 41.2 47.2 4-5 3 380 38.1 38.1 85.3 6 o MAS 4 147 14.7 14.7 99.9 NS 99 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE17 Hay telefono en su casa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 390 39.0 39.0 39.0 No 2 607 60.8 60.8 99.8 Nc 3 2 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 TAMAULIPAS II MAYO/98 5/20/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM20598) FRECPOND.LST PELE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 115 11.5 11.5 11.5 PRI 2 532 53.3 53.3 64.8 PRD 4 102 10.2 10.2 75.0 PC 5 3 .3 .3 75.4 PARM 6 5 .5 .5 75.8 PT 8 4 .4 .4 76.2 PVEM 9 4 .4 .4 76.6 NINGUNO 11 43 4.3 4.3 81.0 NS 12 109 10.9 10.9 91.8 NC-BLANCO 13 79 7.9 7.9 99.8 ANULADO 14 2 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 TAMAULIPAS II MAYO/98 5/20/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM20598) FRECPOND.LST This procedure was completed at 18:54:30 The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 999 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 6054 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 756 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 115 11.5 11.5 11.5 PRI 2 532 53.3 53.3 64.8 PRD 4 102 10.2 10.2 75.0 OTRO 10 16 1.6 1.6 76.6 NINGUNO 11 43 4.3 4.3 81.0 NS 12 109 10.9 10.9 91.8 NC-BLANCO 13 82 8.2 8.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 999 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 TAMAULIPAS II MAYO/98 5/20/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM20598) FRECPOND.LST This procedure was completed at 18:54:33 End of Include file.