The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 789 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 5322 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 665 Value Labels for each Variable. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESTADO ESTADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DURANGO 10 789 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MUN MUNICIPIO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CANATLAN 1 39 5.0 5.0 5.0 CANELAS 2 54 6.8 6.8 11.8 DURANGO 5 252 32.0 32.0 43.8 GOMEZ PALACIO 7 86 10.9 10.9 54.8 LERDO 12 95 12.0 12.0 66.7 MEZQUITAL 14 53 6.7 6.7 73.5 NOMBRE DE DIOS 16 54 6.8 6.8 80.3 PUEBLO NUEVO 23 45 5.7 5.7 86.1 RODEO 24 52 6.6 6.6 92.7 TLAHUALILO 36 58 7.3 7.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST ESTRATO ESTRATO SOCIAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUY BAJA 1 40 5.1 5.1 5.1 BAJA 2 226 28.6 28.6 33.8 ALTA 3 141 17.8 17.8 51.6 MUY ALTA 4 80 10.1 10.1 61.7 RURAL 7 302 38.3 38.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1_1 CON QUE FRECUENCIA VE: VENTANEANDO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TODAS LAS SEMANAS 1 94 12.0 12.0 12.0 MAYORIA SEMANAS 2 63 7.9 7.9 19.9 OCASIONALMENTE 3 285 36.1 36.1 56.0 NUNCA 4 342 43.4 43.4 99.4 NS 5 3 .4 .4 99.7 NC 6 2 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1_2 CON QUE FRECUENCIA VE: MUJER CASOS DE... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TODAS LAS SEMANAS 1 122 15.5 15.5 15.5 MAYORIA SEMANAS 2 89 11.3 11.3 26.7 OCASIONALMENTE 3 269 34.1 34.1 60.9 NUNCA 4 301 38.1 38.1 99.0 NS 5 7 .9 .9 99.9 NC 6 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST MALVSRIE CON CUAL DICHO SE IDENTIFICA MAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAS VALE MALO X CONO 1 255 32.4 32.4 32.4 EL QUE NO ARRIESGA N 2 418 53.0 53.0 85.4 NINGUNA DE LAS ANTER 3 51 6.5 6.5 91.8 AMBOS 4 43 5.4 5.4 97.2 NS 5 21 2.7 2.7 99.9 NC 6 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P3 NO SATISFECHO...¿VALE LA PENA QUEJARSE? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VALE LA PENA 1 456 57.8 57.8 57.8 DESPERDICIO DE TIEMP 2 247 31.2 31.2 89.1 DEPENDE 3 65 8.2 8.2 97.3 NS 4 21 2.7 2.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4 ¿LE GUSTA HACER COSAS EMOCIONANTES...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 360 45.6 45.6 45.6 A VECES 2 93 11.7 11.7 57.3 NO 3 327 41.5 41.5 98.8 NS 4 8 1.0 1.0 99.9 NC 5 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST P5_1 CON QUE FRECUENCIA VE: SE VALE SOÑAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TODAS LAS SEMANAS 1 58 7.4 7.4 7.4 MAYORIA SEMANAS 2 72 9.1 9.1 16.4 OCASIONALMENTE 3 196 24.9 24.9 41.3 NUNCA 4 454 57.6 57.6 98.9 NS 5 8 1.0 1.0 99.9 NC 6 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5_2 CON QUE FRECUENCIA VE: SIEMPRE EN DOMING Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TODAS LAS SEMANAS 1 157 19.9 19.9 19.9 MAYORIA SEMANAS 2 83 10.5 10.5 30.3 OCASIONALMENTE 3 233 29.6 29.6 59.9 NUNCA 4 311 39.5 39.5 99.4 NS 5 5 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SITEDO ¿SITUACION ACTUAL DE DURANGO, MEJOR? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 296 37.6 37.6 37.6 IGUAL DE BIEN 2 47 5.9 5.9 43.5 IGUAL DE MAL 3 132 16.7 16.7 60.2 PEOR 4 277 35.1 35.1 95.3 NS 5 36 4.6 4.6 99.8 NC 6 1 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST EXEDO ¿COMO SERA SITUACION DGO.AÑO QUE ENTRA? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 305 38.7 38.7 38.7 IGUAL DE BIEN 2 47 5.9 5.9 44.6 IGUAL DE MAL 3 72 9.2 9.2 53.8 PEOR 4 223 28.3 28.3 82.1 NS 5 141 17.8 17.8 99.9 NC 6 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9 NOMBRES POSIBLES CANDIDATOS A GUBERNATUR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 205 26.0 26.0 26.0 NO 2 574 72.8 72.8 98.8 NS 3 10 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST P9_1 ¿DE QUIEN? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTROS 10 2 .3 1.2 1.2 MAXIMILIANO SILERIO 11 6 .7 2.9 4.0 SALVADOR SALUM DEL P 12 6 .8 3.1 7.1 RODOLFO ELIZONDO 13 8 1.0 3.7 10.8 SERGIO GUERRERO MIER 14 67 8.4 32.4 43.2 ATANILO TORRES 15 1 .2 .7 43.9 RAFAEL VILLEGAS ATOL 16 2 .3 1.1 45.0 JOSE ROSAS AISPULO 17 5 .7 2.5 47.5 JUAN DE DIOS CASTRO 18 4 .5 1.9 49.4 EMILIO HERNANDEZ CAM 19 3 .4 1.6 51.0 MARCOS CRUZ 20 2 .2 .7 51.7 FRANCISCO BOLIVAR 21 1 .1 .6 52.3 JUAN ARISMENDI HERNA 22 3 .3 1.3 53.6 FELIX LEON 23 1 .1 .5 54.1 MAXIMINO GAMIZ PARRA 24 16 2.0 7.8 61.9 ROSARIO CASTRO 25 1 .1 .5 62.4 ALEJANDO GONZALEZ YA 26 24 3.0 11.7 74.1 HECTOR ROMO 28 1 .1 .4 74.4 ALFONSO FERNANDEZ 30 1 .1 .4 74.9 SAMUEL AGUILAR 31 1 .1 .4 75.3 ISMAEL HERNANDEZ 32 3 .3 1.3 76.6 SOLEDAD RUIZ 33 2 .3 1.0 77.6 INSUF ESPECIF 97 1 .1 .4 78.0 NC 98 2 .2 .7 78.7 NS 99 44 5.5 21.3 100.0 0 584 74.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 205 Missing cases 584 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST P9_2 ¿DE QUIEN? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAXIMILIANO SILERIO 11 1 .2 2.5 2.5 SALVADOR SALUM DEL P 12 1 .1 2.1 4.6 RODOLFO ELIZONDO 13 8 1.0 14.6 19.2 SERGIO GUERRERO MIER 14 9 1.2 17.0 36.2 EMILIO HERNANDEZ CAM 19 5 .6 8.5 44.7 MARCOS CRUZ 20 2 .3 3.8 48.5 MAXIMINO GAMIZ PARRA 24 5 .7 9.6 58.1 ALEJANDO GONZALEZ YA 26 12 1.6 22.5 80.6 RAUL AVENDAÑO 27 1 .2 2.7 83.4 JUDITH MURGUIA 29 1 .1 1.7 85.1 SAMUEL AGUILAR 31 4 .6 8.0 93.1 SOLEDAD RUIZ 33 4 .5 6.9 100.0 0 735 93.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 54 Missing cases 735 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA11 OIDO HABLAR DE: RODOLFO ELIZONDO T. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 370 46.9 46.9 46.9 NC 2 1 .1 .1 47.1 SI 3 418 52.9 52.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST CONRCA12 OIDO HABLAR DE: JUAN DE DIOS CASTRO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 580 73.5 73.5 73.5 NC 2 1 .1 .1 73.6 SI 3 208 26.4 26.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA13 OIDO HABLAR DE: SALVADOR SALUM P. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 610 77.4 77.4 77.4 NC 2 3 .4 .4 77.8 SI 3 175 22.2 22.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA14 OIDO HABLAR DE: MA.ROSARIO CASTRO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 553 70.0 70.0 70.0 NC 2 5 .7 .7 70.7 SI 3 231 29.3 29.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST CANOPI11 OPINION DE: RODOLFO ELIZONDO T. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 181 23.0 43.4 43.4 REGULAR 2 118 15.0 28.4 71.8 MALA 3 31 4.0 7.5 79.3 NS/NC 4 86 10.9 20.7 100.0 0 371 47.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 418 Missing cases 371 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI12 OPINION DE: JUAN DE DIOS CASTRO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 93 11.7 44.5 44.5 REGULAR 2 67 8.5 32.2 76.7 MALA 3 18 2.2 8.5 85.2 NS/NC 4 31 3.9 14.8 100.0 0 581 73.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 208 Missing cases 581 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI13 OPINION DE: SALVADOR SALUM P. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 69 8.7 39.3 39.3 REGULAR 2 49 6.2 28.1 67.4 MALA 3 20 2.5 11.3 78.6 NS/NC 4 37 4.7 21.4 100.0 0 614 77.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 175 Missing cases 614 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST CANOPI14 OPINION DE: MA.ROSARIO CASTRO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 142 18.0 61.3 61.3 REGULAR 2 50 6.3 21.6 82.9 MALA 3 20 2.5 8.5 91.4 NS/NC 4 20 2.5 8.6 100.0 0 558 70.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 231 Missing cases 558 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P11 CANDIDATOS PAN FUERAN...A QUIEN PREFERIR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent RODOLFO ELIZONDO L. 1 195 24.7 24.7 24.7 JUAN DE DIOS CASTRO 2 52 6.6 6.6 31.3 SALVADOR SALUM 3 25 3.1 3.1 34.4 MA.DEL ROSARIO CASTR 4 90 11.4 11.4 45.8 NO LOS CONOCE LOS SU 5 314 39.9 39.9 85.7 NINGUNO 6 79 10.1 10.1 95.7 NS 7 33 4.2 4.2 99.9 NC 8 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST PACU ACUERDO COMO ESTA GOBERNANDO PDTE EZP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 379 48.0 48.0 48.0 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 183 23.2 23.2 71.2 DESACUERDO EN PARTE 3 29 3.6 3.6 74.9 DESACUERDO 4 175 22.2 22.2 97.1 NS 5 20 2.5 2.5 99.6 NC 6 3 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA21 OIDO HABLAR DE: EMILIO HERNANDEZ CAMARGO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 591 74.9 74.9 74.9 NC 2 1 .1 .1 75.1 SI 3 197 24.9 24.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA22 OIDO HABLAR DE: MAXIMO GAMIZ PARRAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 512 64.8 64.8 64.8 SI 3 277 35.2 35.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST CONRCA23 OIDO HABLAR DE: ANGEL S.GUERRERO M. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 408 51.8 51.8 51.8 NC 2 1 .1 .1 51.9 SI 3 379 48.1 48.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA24 OIDO HABLAR DE: JOSE ROSAS AISPURO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 612 77.5 77.5 77.5 NC 2 7 .8 .8 78.4 SI 3 171 21.6 21.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI21 OPINION DE: EMILIO HERNANDEZ CAMARGO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 69 8.7 34.9 34.9 REGULAR 2 68 8.6 34.7 69.5 MALA 3 23 2.9 11.6 81.2 NS/NC 4 37 4.7 18.8 100.0 0 592 75.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 197 Missing cases 592 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST CANOPI22 OPINION DE: MAXIMO GAMIZ PARRAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 110 14.0 39.7 39.7 REGULAR 2 83 10.5 30.0 69.7 MALA 3 33 4.2 11.9 81.6 NS/NC 4 51 6.5 18.4 100.0 0 512 64.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 277 Missing cases 512 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI23 OPINION DE: ANGEL S.GUERRERO M. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 156 19.7 41.1 41.1 REGULAR 2 117 14.8 30.8 71.8 MALA 3 48 6.0 12.6 84.4 NS/NC 4 59 7.5 15.6 100.0 0 410 51.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 379 Missing cases 410 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI24 OPINION DE: JOSE ROSAS AISPURO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 46 5.9 27.2 27.2 REGULAR 2 60 7.6 35.0 62.2 MALA 3 25 3.2 14.7 76.9 NS/NC 4 39 5.0 23.1 100.0 0 618 78.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 171 Missing cases 618 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST EXCAM ¿MAS IMPORTANTE EN PROXIMO GOBERNADOR? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXPER PARA GOBERNAR 1 377 47.8 47.8 47.8 OPCION DE CAMBIO 2 347 44.0 44.0 91.8 NINGUNA 3 33 4.2 4.2 96.0 NS 4 29 3.7 3.7 99.6 NC 5 3 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA31 OIDO HABLAR DE: JUDITH MURGUIA C Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 535 67.8 67.8 67.8 NC 2 2 .2 .2 68.0 SI 3 252 32.0 32.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA32 OIDO HABLAR DE: JUAN ARIZMENDI HDEZ. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 535 67.8 67.8 67.8 SI 3 254 32.2 32.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST CONRCA33 OIDO HABLAR DE: RAFAEL VILLEGAS ATOLLINI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 638 80.8 80.8 80.8 SI 3 151 19.2 19.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA34 OIDO HABLAR DE: SAMUEL AGUILAR SOLIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 657 83.3 83.3 83.3 NC 2 6 .7 .7 84.0 SI 3 126 16.0 16.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI31 OPINION DE: JUDITH MURGUIA C Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 77 9.8 30.6 30.6 REGULAR 2 70 8.9 27.9 58.5 MALA 3 36 4.6 14.3 72.8 NS/NC 4 69 8.7 27.2 100.0 0 537 68.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 252 Missing cases 537 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST CANOPI32 OPINION DE: JUAN ARIZMENDI HDEZ. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 80 10.2 31.5 31.5 REGULAR 2 90 11.4 35.5 67.0 MALA 3 28 3.6 11.1 78.1 NS/NC 4 56 7.1 21.9 100.0 0 535 67.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 254 Missing cases 535 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI33 OPINION DE: RAFAEL VILLEGAS ATOLLINI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 31 4.0 20.7 20.7 REGULAR 2 64 8.1 42.1 62.8 MALA 3 31 3.9 20.4 83.2 NS/NC 4 25 3.2 16.8 100.0 0 638 80.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 151 Missing cases 638 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI34 OPINION DE: SAMUEL AGUILAR SOLIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 36 4.6 28.9 28.9 REGULAR 2 46 5.9 36.7 65.6 MALA 3 18 2.3 14.3 79.8 NS/NC 4 25 3.2 20.2 100.0 0 663 84.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 126 Missing cases 663 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST P16_1 VOTOS PARA: EMILIO HERNANDEZ CAMARGO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 700 88.7 88.7 88.7 UNO 1 25 3.2 3.2 91.9 DOS 2 26 3.2 3.2 95.1 TRES 3 13 1.6 1.6 96.8 CINCO 5 26 3.2 3.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P16_2 VOTOS PARA: MAXIMO GAMIZ PARRAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 675 85.5 85.5 85.5 UNO 1 29 3.7 3.7 89.2 DOS 2 30 3.8 3.8 93.1 TRES 3 21 2.6 2.6 95.7 CUATRO 4 2 .3 .3 96.0 CINCO 5 32 4.0 4.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P16_3 VOTOS PARA: ANGEL S. GUERRERO MIER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 628 79.6 79.6 79.6 UNO 1 19 2.4 2.4 82.0 DOS 2 32 4.0 4.0 86.0 TRES 3 36 4.5 4.5 90.6 CUATRO 4 3 .3 .3 90.9 CINCO 5 72 9.1 9.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST P16_4 VOTOS PARA: JOSE ROJAS AISPORU Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 746 94.6 94.6 94.6 UNO 1 15 1.9 1.9 96.5 DOS 2 10 1.3 1.3 97.8 TRES 3 4 .5 .5 98.3 CUATRO 4 1 .1 .1 98.4 CINCO 5 12 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P16_5 VOTOS PARA: JUDITH MURGUIA CORRAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 713 90.3 90.3 90.3 UNO 1 19 2.5 2.5 92.8 DOS 2 22 2.8 2.8 95.6 TRES 3 11 1.4 1.4 97.0 CUATRO 4 2 .3 .3 97.3 CINCO 5 21 2.7 2.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 32 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST P16_6 VOTOS PARA: JUAN ARIZMENDI HERNANDEZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 714 90.5 90.5 90.5 UNO 1 18 2.3 2.3 92.8 DOS 2 20 2.5 2.5 95.3 TRES 3 10 1.3 1.3 96.6 CUATRO 4 1 .2 .2 96.7 CINCO 5 26 3.3 3.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P16_7 VOTOS PARA: RAFAEL VILLEGAS ATOLLINI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 741 93.9 93.9 93.9 UNO 1 9 1.2 1.2 95.0 DOS 2 12 1.6 1.6 96.6 TRES 3 3 .3 .3 96.9 CUATRO 4 2 .3 .3 97.2 CINCO 5 22 2.8 2.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P16_8 VOTOS PARA: SAMUEL AGUILAR SOLIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 742 94.1 94.1 94.1 UNO 1 18 2.3 2.3 96.4 DOS 2 11 1.4 1.4 97.8 TRES 3 4 .6 .6 98.4 CINCO 5 13 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 33 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST P16_9 VOTOS PARA: NINGUNO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 574 72.8 72.8 72.8 UNO 1 2 .2 .2 73.0 DOS 2 4 .5 .5 73.6 TRES 3 2 .2 .2 73.8 CUATRO 4 1 .2 .2 74.0 CINCO 5 205 26.0 26.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P16_10 VOTOS PARA: NS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 599 75.9 75.9 75.9 UNO 1 1 .1 .1 76.0 DOS 2 3 .4 .4 76.4 TRES 3 2 .3 .3 76.7 CINCO 5 184 23.3 23.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P16_11 VOTOS PARA: NC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 785 99.6 99.6 99.6 CINCO 5 4 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 34 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST P17 CANDIDATOS PRI FUERAN...A QUIEN PREFERIR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EMILIO HERNANDEZ CAM 1 40 5.1 5.1 5.1 MAXIMO GAMIZ PARRAL 2 56 7.1 7.1 12.2 ANGEL S.GUERRERO MIE 3 130 16.4 16.4 28.6 JOSE ROJAS AISPORU 4 20 2.5 2.5 31.2 JUDITH MURGUIA CORRA 5 30 3.7 3.7 34.9 JUAN ARIZMENDI HDEZ. 6 42 5.3 5.3 40.2 RAFAEL VILLEGAS ATOL 7 33 4.1 4.1 44.4 SAMUEL AGUILAR SOLIS 8 13 1.6 1.6 46.0 NO LOS CONOCE LO SUF 9 226 28.6 28.6 74.6 NINGUNO 10 152 19.3 19.3 93.9 NS 11 46 5.8 5.8 99.6 NC 12 3 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P17A ¿POR CUAL DE ELLOS SE INCLINARIA MAS? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EMILIO HERNANDEZ CAM 1 5 .6 1.7 1.7 MAXIMO GAMIZ PARRAL 2 2 .3 .9 2.6 ANGEL S.GUERRERO MIE 3 5 .6 1.8 4.5 JOSE ROJAS AISPORU 4 1 .2 .5 4.9 JUDITH MURGUIA CORRA 5 8 1.0 3.0 7.9 JUAN ARIZMENDI HDEZ. 6 11 1.4 4.0 11.9 RAFAEL VILLEGAS ATOL 7 3 .3 1.0 12.9 SAMUEL AGUILAR SOLIS 8 4 .5 1.5 14.4 NINGUNO 10 64 8.2 23.8 38.1 NS 11 158 20.0 58.1 96.3 NC 12 10 1.3 3.7 100.0 0 518 65.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 271 Missing cases 518 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 35 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST PACUG ACUERDO CON GOBERNADOR MAXIMILIANO SILER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 382 48.4 48.4 48.4 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 144 18.3 18.3 66.7 DESACUERDO EN PARTE 3 29 3.7 3.7 70.3 DESACUERDO 4 196 24.8 24.8 95.2 NS 5 36 4.6 4.6 99.8 NC 6 2 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA41 OIDO HABLAR DE: MARCOS CRUZ MTZ. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 438 55.6 55.6 55.6 NC 2 1 .1 .1 55.7 SI 3 350 44.3 44.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA42 OIDO HABLAR DE: ALEJANDRO GLEZ.YAÑEZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 419 53.1 53.1 53.1 NC 2 1 .1 .1 53.2 SI 3 369 46.8 46.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 36 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST CONRCA43 OIDO HABLAR DE: GABINO GUZMAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 732 92.8 92.8 92.8 NC 2 4 .5 .5 93.3 SI 3 53 6.7 6.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI41 OPINION DE: MARCOS CRUZ MTZ. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 172 21.8 49.2 49.2 REGULAR 2 103 13.0 29.4 78.6 MALA 3 46 5.8 13.2 91.7 NS/NC 4 29 3.7 8.3 100.0 0 439 55.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 350 Missing cases 439 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI42 OPINION DE: ALEJANDRO GLEZ.YAÑEZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 184 23.4 49.9 49.9 REGULAR 2 102 12.9 27.6 77.6 MALA 3 53 6.7 14.3 91.9 NS/NC 4 30 3.8 8.1 100.0 0 420 53.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 369 Missing cases 420 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 37 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST CANOPI43 OPINION DE: GABINO GUZMAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 16 2.0 28.0 28.0 REGULAR 2 18 2.2 31.0 59.0 MALA 3 13 1.6 22.0 81.0 NS/NC 4 11 1.4 19.0 100.0 0 732 92.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 57 Missing cases 732 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P20 CANDIDATOS PT FUERAN...A QUIEN PREFERIRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MARCOS CRUZ MARTINEZ 1 99 12.5 12.5 12.5 ALEJANDRO GONZALEZ Y 2 189 24.0 24.0 36.5 GABINO GUZMAN 3 16 2.1 2.1 38.6 NO LOS CONOCE LO SUF 4 345 43.8 43.8 82.4 NINGUNO 5 118 14.9 14.9 97.3 NS 6 20 2.6 2.6 99.9 NC 7 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 38 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST INDEPAR NORMALMENTE USTED SE CONSIDERA... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PANISTA 1 156 19.8 19.8 19.8 PRIISTA 2 243 30.9 30.9 50.6 PETISTA 3 131 16.7 16.7 67.3 DE OTRO PARTIDO 4 41 5.1 5.1 72.4 NO SE IDENTIFICA CON 5 205 26.0 26.0 98.5 NC 6 12 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TREHEAD1 CANDIDATOS PAN,PRI Y PT-PRD ¿X CUAL VOTA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent RET DEL PAN 1 192 24.3 24.3 24.3 ASGM DEL PRI 2 246 31.2 31.2 55.5 AGY DEL PT-PRD 3 224 28.4 28.4 83.9 NINGUNO 4 67 8.5 8.5 92.3 NS 5 58 7.3 7.3 99.6 NC 6 3 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COSTUVOT CUAL SE ACERCA MAS A LO QUE PIENSA... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SIEMPRE VOTA X MISMO 1 421 53.3 53.3 53.3 A VECES VOTA X UNO 2 271 34.4 34.4 87.7 NINGUNA DE LAS DOS 3 79 10.0 10.0 97.7 NS 4 16 2.0 2.0 99.8 NC 5 2 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 39 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST TREHEAD2 CANDIDATOS PAN,PRI Y PT-PRD ¿X CUAL VOTA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent RET DEL PAN 1 195 24.7 24.7 24.7 MGP DEL PRI 2 244 30.9 30.9 55.6 AGY PT-PRD 3 229 29.0 29.0 84.6 NINGUNO 4 60 7.6 7.6 92.3 NS 5 57 7.3 7.3 99.6 NC 6 4 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P25_1 OPINION DE: JACOBO ZABLUDOVSKY Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUY BUENA 1 86 10.9 10.9 10.9 BUENA 2 510 64.7 64.7 75.5 MALA 3 93 11.8 11.8 87.3 MUY MALA 4 4 .5 .5 87.8 NS/NC 5 96 12.2 12.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P25_2 OPINION DE: EL SUBCOMANDANTE MARCOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUY BUENA 1 7 .9 .9 .9 BUENA 2 171 21.7 21.7 22.6 MALA 3 199 25.3 25.3 47.9 MUY MALA 4 60 7.6 7.6 55.5 NS/NC 5 351 44.5 44.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 40 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST BIHEAD CANDIDATOS PT-PRD Y PRI ¿X CUAL VOTARIA? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGY DEL PT-PRD 1 286 36.2 36.2 36.2 AGM DEL PRI 2 299 37.9 37.9 74.1 NINGUNO 3 143 18.1 18.1 92.3 NS 4 56 7.0 7.0 99.3 NC 5 5 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P27_1 OPINION DE: HUELGAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUY BUENA 1 6 .7 .7 .7 BUENA 2 392 49.7 49.7 50.4 MALA 3 282 35.7 35.7 86.1 MUY MALA 4 16 2.1 2.1 88.2 NS/NC 5 93 11.8 11.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P27_2 OPINION DE: EMPRESARIOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUY BUENA 1 14 1.7 1.7 1.7 BUENA 2 313 39.7 39.7 41.4 MALA 3 213 27.0 27.0 68.4 MUY MALA 4 22 2.8 2.8 71.3 NS/NC 5 227 28.7 28.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 41 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST P27_3 OPINION DE: PRIVATIZACION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUY BUENA 1 28 3.5 3.5 3.5 BUENA 2 203 25.8 25.8 29.3 MALA 3 238 30.1 30.1 59.4 MUY MALA 4 40 5.1 5.1 64.5 NS/NC 5 280 35.5 35.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_1 VOTOS: PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 489 62.0 62.0 62.0 UNO 1 59 7.5 7.5 69.5 DOS 2 51 6.4 6.4 75.9 TRES 3 53 6.8 6.8 82.7 CUATRO 4 10 1.2 1.2 83.9 CINCO 5 127 16.1 16.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_2 VOTOS: PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 459 58.2 58.2 58.2 UNO 1 42 5.3 5.3 63.4 DOS 2 58 7.4 7.4 70.8 TRES 3 33 4.2 4.2 75.0 CUATRO 4 11 1.4 1.4 76.4 CINCO 5 186 23.6 23.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 42 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST PVOT_3 VOTOS: PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 780 98.9 98.9 98.9 UNO 1 4 .5 .5 99.4 DOS 2 2 .2 .2 99.6 CINCO 5 3 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_4 VOTOS: PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 646 81.9 81.9 81.9 UNO 1 41 5.2 5.2 87.2 DOS 2 18 2.3 2.3 89.4 TRES 3 24 3.0 3.0 92.5 CUATRO 4 1 .1 .1 92.6 CINCO 5 59 7.4 7.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_5 VOTOS: PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 787 99.7 99.7 99.7 UNO 1 1 .2 .2 99.9 DOS 2 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 43 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST PVOT_6 VOTOS: PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 782 99.1 99.1 99.1 UNO 1 3 .4 .4 99.5 DOS 2 4 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_7 VOTOS: PT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 589 74.7 74.7 74.7 UNO 1 38 4.8 4.8 79.5 DOS 2 50 6.4 6.4 85.8 TRES 3 17 2.2 2.2 88.0 CUATRO 4 1 .1 .1 88.1 CINCO 5 94 11.9 11.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_8 VOTOS: PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 778 98.7 98.7 98.7 UNO 1 8 1.1 1.1 99.7 CINCO 5 2 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 44 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST PVOT_9 VOTOS: OTRO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 787 99.7 99.7 99.7 UNO 1 1 .1 .1 99.9 CINCO 5 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_10 VOTOS: ABSTENCION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 736 93.3 93.3 93.3 UNO 1 1 .2 .2 93.5 TRES 3 1 .1 .1 93.6 CINCO 5 50 6.4 6.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_11 VOTOS: NS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 730 92.6 92.6 92.6 TRES 3 1 .1 .1 92.7 CUATRO 4 2 .2 .2 92.9 CINCO 5 56 7.1 7.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 45 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST PVOT_12 VOTOS: NC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 788 99.8 99.8 99.8 UNO 1 1 .1 .1 99.9 CINCO 5 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P29_1 ¿POR CUAL PARTIDO NUNCA VOTARIA? PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 193 24.5 24.5 24.5 NO MENCION 2 596 75.5 75.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P29_2 ¿POR CUAL PARTIDO NUNCA VOTARIA? PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 240 30.4 30.4 30.4 NO MENCION 2 549 69.6 69.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 46 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST P29_3 ¿POR CUAL PARTIDO NUNCA VOTARIA? PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 265 33.5 33.5 33.5 NO MENCION 2 524 66.5 66.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P29_4 ¿POR CUAL PARTIDO NUNCA VOTARIA? PT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 213 27.0 27.0 27.0 NO MENCION 2 576 73.0 73.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P30 ¿EN QUE MEDIO DE COMUNICACION CONFIA +? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PERIODICO 1 70 8.9 8.9 8.9 TELEVISION 2 537 68.1 68.1 76.9 RADIO 3 103 13.0 13.0 90.0 NINGUNO 4 71 9.0 9.0 98.9 NS 5 7 .9 .9 99.9 NC 6 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 47 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST P30_1 PERIODICO ¿CUAL? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EL SIGLO 11 20 2.5 28.0 28.0 EL SOL DE DURANGO 12 23 2.9 32.5 60.5 LA OPINION 13 16 2.1 23.2 83.7 LA JOSRNADA 14 5 .7 7.3 91.0 EL FINANCIERO 15 2 .3 2.9 93.9 EL DIARIO 16 1 .1 1.3 95.2 VICTORIA DE DURANGO 17 1 .1 .8 96.0 NC 98 2 .2 2.4 98.3 NS 99 1 .1 1.7 100.0 0 719 91.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 70 Missing cases 719 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P31 ¿PARTIDO CON MAS POSIBILIDADES DE GANAR? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 102 13.0 13.0 13.0 PRI 2 344 43.7 43.7 56.6 PRD 3 57 7.2 7.2 63.8 OTRO 4 114 14.4 14.4 78.2 NS 5 1 .2 .2 78.4 NC 6 166 21.0 21.0 99.4 7 5 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 48 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 385 48.8 48.8 48.8 femenino 2 404 51.2 51.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 233 29.5 29.5 29.5 26-40 2 271 34.3 34.3 63.8 41-60 3 200 25.4 25.4 89.1 61 + 4 86 10.9 10.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESCOL Escolaridad entrevistado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 36 4.5 4.5 4.5 prim inc 2 178 22.6 22.6 27.1 prim comp 3 161 20.4 20.4 47.5 Sec o Carr Téc incom 4 42 5.3 5.3 52.8 Sec o Carr Téc compl 5 122 15.4 15.4 68.3 Prepa o Carr Téc inc 6 61 7.7 7.7 76.0 Prepa o Carr Téc com 7 88 11.2 11.2 87.1 Universidad incomple 8 47 6.0 6.0 93.1 Universidad Completa 9 55 6.9 6.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 49 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST ESCOL_1 Que carrera o estudios hizo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTRO 10 1 .1 .9 .9 LIC CONTADURIA 60 7 .8 6.5 7.4 LIC DERECHO 61 12 1.6 12.3 19.7 LIC ADMON EMPRESAS 62 1 .2 1.3 21.0 LIC PSICOLOGIA 63 3 .4 3.2 24.2 QUIMICO 64 5 .6 4.8 29.0 MEDICO VETERINARIO 65 2 .2 1.7 30.8 MEDICO 66 2 .3 2.3 33.1 ARQUITECTURA 67 1 .2 1.3 34.4 LIC CIENCIAS DE LA C 69 2 .3 2.0 36.4 ODONTOLOGIA 70 1 .2 1.4 37.8 ING ELECTRONICA 71 3 .4 3.1 40.8 ING INFORMATICA O SI 74 2 .2 1.7 42.5 ING AGRONOMO 75 4 .5 3.9 46.5 LIC ECONOMIA 76 2 .2 1.8 48.2 BIOLOGIA 77 1 .1 .9 49.1 ING FISICO MATEMATIC 78 1 .1 .7 49.8 ING CIVIL 79 1 .1 .7 50.5 ING INDUSTRIAL 80 3 .3 2.5 53.0 LIC TRABAJO SOCIAL 81 1 .1 .9 53.9 LIC PEDAGOGIA 84 1 .1 .6 54.5 LIC MERCADOTECNIA 87 2 .2 1.7 56.2 LIC CIENCIAS POLITIC 92 1 .1 .5 56.8 LIC EN EDUCACION 96 16 2.0 15.4 72.2 LIC EN COMERCIO EXTE 97 3 .4 2.9 75.0 LIC LITERATURA Y LEN 99 1 .1 .7 75.7 LIC EN COMPUTACION 100 2 .2 1.6 77.4 LIC EN ENFERMERIA 106 2 .2 1.6 79.0 ING BIOQUIMICA 107 1 .1 .5 79.5 MAESTRIA EN DERECHO 121 1 .1 .6 80.1 DR EN CIENCIAS SOCIA 127 1 .1 .9 81.0 LIC. MATEMATICAS 138 1 .1 .5 81.6 INSUFICIENTE ESPECIF 997 2 .2 1.7 83.2 NC 998 15 1.9 14.7 98.0 NS 999 2 .3 2.0 100.0 0 687 87.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 102 Missing cases 687 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 50 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST SE4 Actividad la semana pasada... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Trabajó 1 407 51.6 51.6 51.6 Vacaciones (incap) 2 1 .2 .2 51.7 Ama de casa 3 264 33.5 33.5 85.2 Estudiante 4 50 6.3 6.3 91.5 Jubilado/Pensionado 5 23 2.9 2.9 94.4 Desempleado 6 41 5.2 5.2 99.6 Incapacitado Permane 7 2 .3 .3 99.9 Otro 10 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE5 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 789 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 789 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE6 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 789 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 789 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 51 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST SE7 Que es usted en el lugar donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Dueño 1 47 5.9 11.4 11.4 Trabajador Independ 2 97 12.3 23.7 35.1 Directivo 3 10 1.2 2.3 37.4 Empleado 4 147 18.7 35.9 73.3 Obrero 5 24 3.1 5.9 79.2 CAMPESINO 95 84 10.6 20.5 99.7 Nc 98 1 .1 .3 100.0 0 380 48.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 409 Missing cases 380 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE8 Cuantos empleados tiene la empresa...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHICA 1 621 78.8 78.8 78.8 MEDIANA 2 27 3.4 3.4 82.2 GRANDE 3 39 5.0 5.0 87.2 MUY GRANDE 4 86 10.9 10.9 98.0 NC 998 4 .5 .5 98.5 NS 999 12 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 52 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST SE9 En que NIVEL se considera que est usted Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Nivel A 1 87 11.1 53.1 53.1 Nivel B 2 5 .6 3.1 56.2 Nivel C 3 23 2.9 14.1 70.3 Nivel D 4 4 .5 2.5 72.8 Nivel E 5 31 4.0 19.1 91.9 Nivel F 6 3 .4 2.0 93.9 Nivel G 7 3 .4 1.8 95.7 Nivel H 8 3 .4 1.9 97.6 Ns 9 4 .5 2.4 100.0 0 624 79.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 165 Missing cases 624 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE10 Pertenece a algún sindicato Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 89 11.2 27.3 27.3 No 2 229 29.1 70.4 97.7 Nc 3 8 1.0 2.3 100.0 0 463 58.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 326 Missing cases 463 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE11 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 789 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 789 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 53 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST SE11_1 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 789 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 789 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE11_2 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 789 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 789 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE12 Institución en donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent gob fed 1 64 8.1 19.8 19.8 paraestatal 2 15 2.0 4.7 24.5 emp priv 3 97 12.3 29.8 54.3 negocio prop 4 53 6.7 16.3 70.6 independiente 5 92 11.6 28.2 98.8 Ns 7 4 .5 1.2 100.0 0 464 58.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 325 Missing cases 464 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 54 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST SE13 Actividad de la empresa donde trabaja... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Agricultura 1 84 10.6 20.5 20.5 Pesca 2 18 2.3 4.5 25.0 Industrias 3 51 6.4 12.4 37.3 Comercio 4 71 9.0 17.4 54.7 Construccion 5 25 3.1 6.0 60.8 Educacion 6 33 4.2 8.0 68.8 Servicios 7 126 16.0 30.8 99.6 Nc 8 2 .2 .4 100.0 0 380 48.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 409 Missing cases 380 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE14 Usted es propietario de tierra que traba Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si es propietario 1 45 5.7 53.8 53.8 No es propietario 2 37 4.7 44.2 98.0 Nc 3 2 .2 2.0 100.0 0 705 89.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 84 Missing cases 705 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE14_1 Su propiedad es de que tipo...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Ejidal 1 36 4.6 77.0 77.0 Privada/Peq Propiet 3 10 1.3 21.2 98.2 Ns 4 1 .1 1.8 100.0 0 742 94.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 47 Missing cases 742 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 55 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST SE14_2 Que es usted jornalero o peon...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Jornalero 1 26 3.3 70.1 70.1 Peon 2 11 1.4 29.9 100.0 0 752 95.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 37 Missing cases 752 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE142A Otro (especifique)... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 789 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 789 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INGRE Rango ingreso familiar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 172 21.8 21.8 21.8 1-3 sm 2 314 39.8 39.8 61.6 3-5 sm 3 95 12.1 12.1 73.6 5-7 sm 4 42 5.3 5.3 79.0 7-10 sm 5 54 6.8 6.8 85.8 10-30 sm 6 28 3.5 3.5 89.3 30 + sm 7 9 1.1 1.1 90.4 Ns/Nc 8 76 9.6 9.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 56 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST SE16 Cuantas personas dependen de ingr famili Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 39 4.9 4.9 4.9 2-3 2 271 34.4 34.5 39.5 4-5 3 317 40.2 40.4 79.9 6 o MAS 4 157 19.9 20.0 99.9 NC 98 1 .1 .1 100.0 0 4 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 785 Missing cases 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE17 Tiene telefono en su casa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 238 30.2 30.2 30.2 No 2 549 69.6 69.6 99.8 Nc 3 1 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 57 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST PELE HOY ELEC GOBERNADOR ¿X CUAL PARTIDO VOTA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 170 21.5 21.5 21.5 PRI 2 249 31.6 31.6 53.1 PRD 4 91 11.5 11.5 64.6 PT 8 105 13.3 13.3 77.9 PVEM 9 4 .5 .5 78.5 NINGUNO 11 57 7.2 7.2 85.7 NS 12 72 9.2 9.2 94.8 NC-BLANCO 13 35 4.4 4.4 99.3 ANULADO 14 6 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 58 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST This procedure was completed at 14:03:57 The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 789 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 5322 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 665 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE HOY ELEC GOBERNADOR ¿X CUAL PARTIDO VOTA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 170 21.5 21.5 21.5 PRI 2 249 31.6 31.6 53.1 PRD 4 91 11.5 11.5 64.6 PT 8 105 13.3 13.3 77.9 OTRO 10 4 .5 .5 78.5 NINGUNO 11 57 7.2 7.2 85.7 NS 12 72 9.2 9.2 94.8 NC-BLANCO 13 41 5.2 5.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 789 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 59 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (ESTATAL)CAMPO DIC/97 12/9/97 FRECUENCIAS DGO PONDERADAS EN (DGO11297) FRECPOND.LST This procedure was completed at 14:04:05