The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 91 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 9841 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 1230 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1 SITUACION DEL PAIS MEJOR? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 14 15.9 15.9 15.9 Igual (voluntario) 2 14 15.0 15.0 31.0 Peor 3 61 66.7 66.7 97.7 No sabe 4 2 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 SATISFECHO CON EL NIVEL DE VIDA ACTUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 35 38.1 38.1 38.1 Si en parte 2 6 6.9 6.9 45.0 No 3 50 55.0 55.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 6 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE P3 CANDIDATO INSPIRA MAS CONFIANZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas 1 10 11.1 11.1 11.1 Ernesto Zedillo 2 30 33.2 33.2 44.3 Diego Fdez. de Ceval 3 27 30.2 30.2 74.5 Ninguno 4 13 14.4 14.4 89.0 No sabe 5 5 6.0 6.0 94.9 No contestó 6 5 5.1 5.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4 PRECIOS DE COMPRA HABITALES MAS ALTOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Son más altos 1 67 73.8 73.8 73.8 No han cambiado 2 18 19.9 19.9 93.7 Son más bajos 3 4 3.9 3.9 97.6 No sabe 4 2 2.4 2.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 SIT ECONOMICA PERSONAL MEJOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 28 30.5 30.5 30.5 Igual (voluntario) 2 10 10.6 10.6 41.1 Peor 3 26 28.7 28.7 69.8 No sabe 4 27 30.2 30.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE P6 QUIEN GUSTARIA FUERA PROXIMO PTE REP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas 1 9 10.1 10.1 10.1 Ernesto Zedillo 2 33 36.5 36.5 46.6 Diego Fdez. de Ceval 3 28 30.3 30.3 76.9 Otro 4 4 4.3 4.3 81.2 No sabe 5 12 13.4 13.4 94.6 No contestó 6 5 5.4 5.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7 COMO CONSID SIT ECONOM ACTUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 29 31.9 31.9 31.9 Igual (voluntario) 2 27 29.7 29.7 61.6 Peor 3 35 38.4 38.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8 ACUERDO FORMA DE GOBERNAR PRESIDENTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent De acuerdo 1 45 49.5 49.5 49.5 De acuerdo en parte 2 11 12.5 12.5 62.0 En desacuerdo 3 27 29.5 29.5 91.6 No sabe 4 5 5.3 5.3 96.8 No contestó 5 3 3.2 3.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PATR1 Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Zedillo 2 24 26.8 26.8 32.4 Cevallos 3 34 37.9 37.9 70.2 Ninguno 4 4 4.1 4.1 74.3 NS-NC 5 23 25.7 25.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2 mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 10 11.4 11.4 11.4 Zedillo 2 32 35.5 35.5 46.9 Cevallos 3 25 27.9 27.9 74.8 Ninguno 4 9 9.9 9.9 84.7 NS-NC 5 14 15.3 15.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR3 Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 6 6.4 6.4 6.4 Zedillo 2 25 27.1 27.1 33.5 Cevallos 3 49 53.7 53.7 87.2 Ninguno 4 1 .9 .9 88.1 NS-NC 5 11 11.9 11.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PATR4 Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 16 18.0 18.0 18.0 Zedillo 2 34 37.2 37.2 55.2 Cevallos 3 25 27.7 27.7 82.9 Ninguno 4 3 2.9 2.9 85.8 NS-NC 5 13 14.2 14.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR5 Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 9 9.7 9.7 9.7 Zedillo 2 36 39.4 39.4 49.1 Cevallos 3 26 28.3 28.3 77.4 Ninguno 4 2 2.0 2.0 79.4 NS-NC 5 19 20.6 20.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6 Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 6 6.3 6.3 6.3 Zedillo 2 16 17.1 17.1 23.4 Cevallos 3 22 24.3 24.3 47.7 Ninguno 4 8 9.1 9.1 56.9 NS-NC 5 39 43.1 43.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PATR7 MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 6 6.4 6.4 6.4 Zedillo 2 32 35.7 35.7 42.1 Cevallos 3 32 34.9 34.9 77.0 Ninguno 4 4 3.9 3.9 80.9 NS-NC 5 17 19.1 19.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8 PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 7 7.6 7.6 7.6 Zedillo 2 30 32.9 32.9 40.4 Cevallos 3 20 22.4 22.4 62.8 Ninguno 4 14 15.0 15.0 77.8 NS-NC 5 20 22.2 22.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR9 Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 8 8.8 8.8 8.8 Zedillo 2 21 23.2 23.2 32.1 Cevallos 3 28 31.2 31.2 63.3 Ninguno 4 8 8.7 8.7 72.0 NS-NC 5 25 28.0 28.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PATR1_A Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 2 2.2 6.4 6.4 Zedillo 2 7 7.3 21.3 27.7 Cevallos 3 11 12.5 36.3 64.0 Ninguno 4 4 4.1 12.0 76.0 NS-NC 5 8 8.3 24.0 100.0 . 60 65.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 31 Missing cases 60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2_A mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 5 5.2 15.0 15.0 Zedillo 2 10 11.1 32.4 47.4 Cevallos 3 8 9.1 26.4 73.8 Ninguno 4 4 4.4 12.7 86.5 NS-NC 5 4 4.6 13.5 100.0 . 60 65.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 31 Missing cases 60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR3_A Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 2 2.2 6.4 6.4 Zedillo 2 7 7.8 22.6 29.0 Cevallos 3 20 22.0 63.8 92.8 NS-NC 5 2 2.5 7.2 100.0 . 60 65.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 31 Missing cases 60 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PATR4_A Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 6 6.4 18.6 18.6 Zedillo 2 12 13.6 39.4 58.0 Cevallos 3 9 9.6 28.0 86.0 Ninguno 4 1 .9 2.7 88.7 NS-NC 5 4 3.9 11.3 100.0 . 60 65.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 31 Missing cases 60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR5_A Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 2 2.2 6.4 6.4 Zedillo 2 13 14.4 41.7 48.1 Cevallos 3 10 10.6 30.7 78.8 NS-NC 5 7 7.3 21.2 100.0 . 60 65.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 31 Missing cases 60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6_A Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Zedillo 2 6 6.9 19.9 19.9 Cevallos 3 9 10.4 30.3 50.2 Ninguno 4 5 5.9 17.0 67.2 NS-NC 5 10 11.3 32.8 100.0 . 60 65.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 31 Missing cases 60 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PATR7_A MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 2 2.2 6.4 6.4 Zedillo 2 7 8.2 23.8 30.2 Cevallos 3 16 17.2 50.0 80.1 Ninguno 4 1 .9 2.6 82.7 NS-NC 5 5 5.9 17.3 100.0 . 60 65.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 31 Missing cases 60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8_A PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 1 1.2 3.5 3.5 Zedillo 2 8 9.2 26.7 30.2 Cevallos 3 7 8.1 23.5 53.7 Ninguno 4 8 9.0 26.2 79.9 NS-NC 5 6 6.9 20.1 100.0 . 60 65.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 31 Missing cases 60 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PATR9_A Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 3 3.6 10.5 10.5 Zedillo 2 5 5.4 15.6 26.1 Cevallos 3 10 11.5 33.3 59.4 Ninguno 4 4 4.2 12.3 71.6 NS-NC 5 9 9.8 28.4 100.0 . 60 65.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 31 Missing cases 60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR1_B Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 3 3.3 5.0 5.0 Zedillo 2 18 19.5 29.7 34.8 Cevallos 3 23 25.4 38.7 73.5 NS-NC 5 16 17.4 26.5 100.0 . 31 34.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 60 Missing cases 31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2_B mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 6 6.2 9.4 9.4 Zedillo 2 22 24.4 37.2 46.6 Cevallos 3 17 18.8 28.7 75.3 Ninguno 4 5 5.6 8.5 83.8 NS-NC 5 10 10.6 16.2 100.0 . 31 34.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 60 Missing cases 31 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PATR3_B Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 4 4.2 6.4 6.4 Zedillo 2 18 19.3 29.4 35.8 Cevallos 3 29 31.7 48.4 84.3 Ninguno 4 1 .9 1.4 85.6 NS-NC 5 9 9.4 14.4 100.0 . 31 34.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 60 Missing cases 31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR4_B Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 11 11.6 17.7 17.7 Zedillo 2 21 23.6 36.0 53.7 Cevallos 3 16 18.1 27.6 81.3 Ninguno 4 2 2.0 3.0 84.2 NS-NC 5 9 10.3 15.8 100.0 . 31 34.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 60 Missing cases 31 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PATR5_B Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 7 7.5 11.4 11.4 Zedillo 2 23 25.1 38.3 49.7 Cevallos 3 16 17.7 27.0 76.7 Ninguno 4 2 2.0 3.0 79.7 NS-NC 5 12 13.3 20.3 100.0 . 31 34.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 60 Missing cases 31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6_B Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 6 6.3 9.5 9.5 Zedillo 2 9 10.3 15.7 25.2 Cevallos 3 13 13.9 21.2 46.5 Ninguno 4 3 3.2 5.0 51.4 NS-NC 5 29 31.9 48.6 100.0 . 31 34.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 60 Missing cases 31 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PATR7_B MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 4 4.2 6.4 6.4 Zedillo 2 25 27.5 41.9 48.4 Cevallos 3 16 17.7 26.9 75.3 Ninguno 4 3 3.0 4.6 79.9 NS-NC 5 12 13.2 20.1 100.0 . 31 34.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 60 Missing cases 31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8_B PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 6 6.3 9.7 9.7 Zedillo 2 22 23.7 36.1 45.8 Cevallos 3 13 14.3 21.8 67.6 Ninguno 4 5 6.0 9.2 76.7 NS-NC 5 14 15.2 23.3 100.0 . 31 34.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 60 Missing cases 31 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PATR9_B Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 5 5.2 7.9 7.9 Zedillo 2 16 17.9 27.3 35.2 Cevallos 3 18 19.8 30.2 65.4 Ninguno 4 4 4.5 6.8 72.2 NS-NC 5 17 18.2 27.8 100.0 . 31 34.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 60 Missing cases 31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT1_A VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 10 11.2 77.4 77.4 DOS 2 1 1.1 7.4 84.7 TRES 3 1 1.0 6.8 91.6 CINCO 5 1 1.2 8.4 100.0 . 78 85.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 13 Missing cases 78 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PVOT2_A VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.0 4.1 4.1 UNO 1 6 6.4 26.3 30.4 DOS 2 10 11.0 45.7 76.1 TRES 3 2 1.9 7.9 83.9 CUATRO 4 2 1.9 7.9 91.8 CINCO 5 2 2.0 8.2 100.0 . 69 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 22 Missing cases 69 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT3_A VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.0 4.2 4.2 UNO 1 4 4.5 19.0 23.2 DOS 2 6 6.6 28.2 51.4 TRES 3 7 8.2 35.0 86.3 CINCO 5 3 3.2 13.7 100.0 . 70 76.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 21 Missing cases 70 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4_A VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 91 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 91 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PVOT5_A VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 91 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 91 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT6_A VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 4 4.3 100.0 100.0 . 87 95.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 87 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7_A VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .9 100.0 100.0 . 90 99.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 90 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PVOT8_A VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 91 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 91 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT9_A VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 1.4 100.0 100.0 . 90 98.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 90 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10_A VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DOS 2 1 1.0 100.0 100.0 . 90 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 90 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PVOT11_A VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DOS 2 1 1.0 100.0 100.0 . 90 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 90 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT12_A VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 5 5.0 100.0 100.0 . 86 95.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 5 Missing cases 86 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13_A VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 1 .9 100.0 100.0 . 90 99.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 90 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PVOT1_B VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 3 3.4 15.2 15.2 UNO 1 5 5.5 24.8 40.0 DOS 2 5 5.4 24.1 64.1 TRES 3 2 2.0 9.2 73.3 CINCO 5 5 6.0 26.7 100.0 . 71 77.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 20 Missing cases 71 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT2_B VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 4 4.8 13.7 13.7 UNO 1 5 5.9 17.0 30.6 DOS 2 9 10.2 29.2 59.8 TRES 3 2 2.0 5.6 65.4 CINCO 5 11 12.1 34.6 100.0 . 59 65.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 32 Missing cases 59 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PVOT3_B VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 2 2.0 9.2 9.2 UNO 1 3 3.5 15.6 24.8 DOS 2 5 5.3 23.8 48.5 TRES 3 6 6.4 28.5 77.1 CINCO 5 5 5.1 22.9 100.0 . 71 77.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 20 Missing cases 71 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4_B VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.1 100.0 100.0 . 90 98.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 90 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT5_B VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.1 53.6 53.6 CINCO 5 1 .9 46.4 100.0 . 89 98.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 89 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PVOT6_B VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.1 23.4 23.4 DOS 2 3 3.5 76.6 100.0 . 87 95.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 87 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7_B VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.1 26.8 26.8 CINCO 5 3 2.9 73.2 100.0 . 87 96.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 87 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT8_B VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.1 100.0 100.0 . 90 98.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 90 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PVOT9_B VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.1 53.6 53.6 UNO 1 1 .9 46.4 100.0 . 89 98.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 89 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10_B VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.1 42.8 42.8 TRES 3 1 1.4 57.2 100.0 . 89 97.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 89 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT11_B VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.1 15.4 15.4 CINCO 5 5 5.8 84.6 100.0 . 85 93.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6 Missing cases 85 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PVOT12_B VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.1 8.3 8.3 DOS 2 1 1.4 11.1 19.4 CINCO 5 9 10.3 80.6 100.0 . 79 87.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 12 Missing cases 79 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13_B VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 2 2.0 100.0 100.0 . 89 98.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 89 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT1 VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 61 66.7 66.7 66.7 UNO 1 15 16.7 16.7 83.4 DOS 2 6 6.4 6.4 89.8 TRES 3 3 3.0 3.0 92.8 CINCO 5 7 7.2 7.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PVOT2 VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 42 46.6 46.6 46.6 UNO 1 11 12.3 12.3 58.9 DOS 2 19 21.2 21.2 80.1 TRES 3 4 3.9 3.9 84.0 CUATRO 4 2 1.9 1.9 85.9 CINCO 5 13 14.1 14.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT3 VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 52 57.3 57.3 57.3 UNO 1 7 7.9 7.9 65.2 DOS 2 11 11.9 11.9 77.1 TRES 3 13 14.6 14.6 91.7 CINCO 5 8 8.3 8.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4 VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 91 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PVOT5 VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 90 99.1 99.1 99.1 CINCO 5 1 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT6 VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 84 92.2 92.2 92.2 UNO 1 4 4.3 4.3 96.5 DOS 2 3 3.5 3.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7 VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 88 96.2 96.2 96.2 UNO 1 1 .9 .9 97.1 CINCO 5 3 2.9 2.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PVOT8 VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 91 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT9 VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 89 97.7 97.7 97.7 UNO 1 2 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10 VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 89 97.6 97.6 97.6 DOS 2 1 1.0 1.0 98.6 TRES 3 1 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PVOT11 VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 85 93.2 93.2 93.2 DOS 2 1 1.0 1.0 94.2 CINCO 5 5 5.8 5.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT12 VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 76 83.4 83.4 83.4 DOS 2 1 1.4 1.4 84.8 CINCO 5 14 15.2 15.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13 VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 88 97.1 97.1 97.1 CINCO 5 3 2.9 2.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 32 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PELE SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 30 32.4 32.4 32.4 CCS del PRD 2 10 11.1 11.1 43.5 DFC del PAN 3 30 32.6 32.6 76.1 Otro 4 2 2.0 2.0 78.1 Por ninguno 5 4 4.5 4.5 82.6 No sabe 6 7 7.3 7.3 89.8 No contestó 7 9 10.2 10.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE_A SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA A Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 8 8.3 24.2 24.2 CCS del PRD 2 2 2.6 7.6 31.9 DFC del PAN 3 11 12.5 36.3 68.2 Otro 4 2 2.0 5.7 73.9 Por ninguno 5 2 2.3 6.7 80.6 No sabe 6 2 2.3 6.7 87.3 No contestó 7 4 4.4 12.7 100.0 . 60 65.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 31 Missing cases 60 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 33 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE PELE_B SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA B Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 22 24.1 36.8 36.8 CCS del PRD 2 8 8.5 12.9 49.7 DFC del PAN 3 18 20.1 30.7 80.3 Por ninguno 5 2 2.1 3.3 83.6 No sabe 6 5 4.9 7.5 91.1 No contestó 7 5 5.8 8.9 100.0 . 31 34.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 60 Missing cases 31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 42 46.5 46.5 46.5 femenino 2 49 53.5 53.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 26 28.6 28.6 28.6 26-40 2 34 37.6 37.6 66.2 41-60 3 21 23.5 23.5 89.7 61 + 4 9 10.3 10.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 34 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE INST Institución donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 42 46.5 46.5 46.5 gob fed 2 6 6.7 6.7 53.2 paraestatal 3 3 3.2 3.2 56.4 emp priv 4 26 28.1 28.1 84.6 negocio prop 5 5 5.5 5.5 90.1 independiente 6 9 9.9 9.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 24 25.9 55.8 55.8 estudiante 2 10 10.7 22.9 78.7 jubilado 3 5 6.0 13.0 91.7 desemp 4 2 1.9 4.1 95.8 otro 5 2 2.0 4.2 100.0 0 49 53.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 42 Missing cases 49 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 35 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE ACTIV Rama de actividad económica Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent agric 1 1 1.4 2.6 2.6 industria 2 8 8.8 16.5 19.1 comercio 3 12 12.6 23.6 42.7 construc 4 1 1.4 2.7 45.4 educación 5 5 5.9 11.0 56.3 otros servs 6 21 23.4 43.7 100.0 0 42 46.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 49 Missing cases 42 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUESTO Que puesto ocupa en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario, Patron o 1 2 2.0 3.7 3.7 Directivo o Func de 2 2 2.0 3.7 7.3 Contratista o trabaj 3 7 8.0 14.9 22.3 Profesionista Indepe 4 3 3.4 6.3 28.6 Emplea, trabaj, Obre 5 34 37.0 69.2 97.7 trabajador sin pago 6 1 1.2 2.3 100.0 0 42 46.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 49 Missing cases 42 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 36 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 1 1.2 1.2 1.2 prim inc 2 3 3.7 3.7 4.9 prim comp 3 13 14.1 14.1 19.0 sec incom 4 3 3.3 3.3 22.3 sec comp 5 13 14.8 14.8 37.1 prep incom 6 10 11.4 11.4 48.5 prep comp 7 16 17.2 17.2 65.6 univ incom 8 8 9.2 9.2 74.9 univ comp + 9 23 25.1 25.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 2 2.4 2.4 2.4 1-3 sm 2 23 24.9 24.9 27.3 3-5 sm 3 16 17.7 17.7 45.0 5-7 sm 4 5 5.0 5.0 49.9 7-10 5 13 13.7 13.7 63.7 10 + SM 6 18 19.9 19.9 83.6 7 15 16.4 16.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 91 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 37 ROLLOVER (76) DF 11/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/11/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL8DF.FRE This procedure was completed at 19:56:20 End of Include file.