The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 95 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 7703 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 963 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1 SITUACION DEL PAIS MEJOR? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 22 23.4 23.4 23.4 Igual (voluntario) 2 12 12.4 12.4 35.8 Peor 3 55 57.7 57.7 93.5 No sabe 4 5 5.6 5.6 99.1 No contestó 5 1 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 SATISFECHO CON EL NIVEL DE VIDA ACTUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 45 47.4 47.4 47.4 Si en parte 2 6 6.7 6.7 54.1 No 3 44 45.9 45.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 6 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE P3 CANDIDATO INSPIRA MAS CONFIANZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas 1 12 12.9 12.9 12.9 Ernesto Zedillo 2 30 31.9 31.9 44.7 Diego Fdez. de Ceval 3 30 31.8 31.8 76.5 Ninguno 4 14 14.8 14.8 91.3 No sabe 5 1 1.2 1.2 92.5 No contestó 6 7 7.5 7.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4 PRECIOS DE COMPRA HABITALES MAS ALTOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Son más altos 1 69 72.5 72.5 72.5 No han cambiado 2 18 18.9 18.9 91.4 Son más bajos 3 6 6.8 6.8 98.1 No sabe 4 2 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 SIT ECONOMICA PERSONAL MEJOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 44 46.0 46.0 46.0 Igual (voluntario) 2 13 14.0 14.0 60.1 Peor 3 12 12.9 12.9 72.9 No sabe 4 24 24.9 24.9 97.9 No contestó 5 2 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE P6 QUIEN GUSTARIA FUERA PROXIMO PTE REP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas 1 14 14.6 14.6 14.6 Ernesto Zedillo 2 33 34.9 34.9 49.5 Diego Fdez. de Ceval 3 24 25.3 25.3 74.8 Otro 4 6 6.8 6.8 81.5 No sabe 5 6 6.6 6.6 88.1 No contestó 6 11 11.9 11.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7 COMO CONSID SIT ECONOM ACTUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 33 34.4 34.4 34.4 Igual (voluntario) 2 28 29.9 29.9 64.3 Peor 3 34 35.7 35.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8 ACUERDO FORMA DE GOBERNAR PRESIDENTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent De acuerdo 1 51 53.6 53.6 53.6 De acuerdo en parte 2 23 24.7 24.7 78.3 En desacuerdo 3 17 17.8 17.8 96.1 No sabe 4 2 2.1 2.1 98.2 No contestó 5 2 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PATR1 Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Zedillo 2 21 22.2 22.2 28.7 Cevallos 3 40 42.6 42.6 71.3 Ninguno 4 5 4.9 4.9 76.2 NS-NC 5 23 23.8 23.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2 mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 13 14.0 14.0 14.0 Zedillo 2 29 30.4 30.4 44.3 Cevallos 3 27 28.1 28.1 72.4 Ninguno 4 13 13.5 13.5 85.9 NS-NC 5 13 14.1 14.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR3 Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 7 7.8 7.8 7.8 Zedillo 2 23 24.6 24.6 32.5 Cevallos 3 52 54.9 54.9 87.4 Ninguno 4 3 3.6 3.6 90.9 NS-NC 5 9 9.1 9.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PATR4 Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 23 24.6 24.6 24.6 Zedillo 2 26 27.3 27.3 51.9 Cevallos 3 27 27.9 27.9 79.8 Ninguno 4 5 5.6 5.6 85.4 NS-NC 5 14 14.6 14.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR5 Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 15 15.9 15.9 15.9 Zedillo 2 30 32.1 32.1 48.0 Cevallos 3 26 27.0 27.0 75.0 Ninguno 4 12 12.5 12.5 87.5 NS-NC 5 12 12.5 12.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6 Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 13 13.9 13.9 13.9 Zedillo 2 18 19.3 19.3 33.1 Cevallos 3 23 24.4 24.4 57.6 Ninguno 4 14 14.6 14.6 72.2 NS-NC 5 26 27.8 27.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PATR7 MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 8 8.3 8.3 8.3 Zedillo 2 35 37.2 37.2 45.5 Cevallos 3 38 40.2 40.2 85.7 Ninguno 4 7 7.2 7.2 92.9 NS-NC 5 7 7.1 7.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8 PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 10 11.0 11.0 11.0 Zedillo 2 22 23.4 23.4 34.4 Cevallos 3 22 22.9 22.9 57.4 Ninguno 4 26 27.9 27.9 85.3 NS-NC 5 14 14.7 14.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR9 Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 11 11.8 11.8 11.8 Zedillo 2 24 25.6 25.6 37.4 Cevallos 3 30 31.8 31.8 69.2 Ninguno 4 16 17.0 17.0 86.2 NS-NC 5 13 13.8 13.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PATR1_A Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 2 1.8 3.7 3.7 Zedillo 2 12 12.1 25.3 29.0 Cevallos 3 21 21.7 45.2 74.2 Ninguno 4 4 4.2 8.7 82.9 NS-NC 5 8 8.2 17.1 100.0 . 49 52.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 46 Missing cases 49 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2_A mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 3 2.8 5.7 5.7 Zedillo 2 14 14.3 29.8 35.6 Cevallos 3 17 17.7 36.8 72.4 Ninguno 4 4 3.7 7.8 80.2 NS-NC 5 9 9.5 19.8 100.0 . 49 52.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 46 Missing cases 49 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PATR3_A Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 3 2.7 5.6 5.6 Zedillo 2 11 11.1 23.1 28.6 Cevallos 3 24 25.3 52.8 81.5 Ninguno 4 3 3.6 7.4 88.9 NS-NC 5 5 5.3 11.1 100.0 . 49 52.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 46 Missing cases 49 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR4_A Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 9 9.5 19.9 19.9 Zedillo 2 12 12.7 26.4 46.3 Cevallos 3 16 16.4 34.2 80.6 Ninguno 4 3 3.6 7.6 88.2 NS-NC 5 5 5.7 11.8 100.0 . 49 52.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 46 Missing cases 49 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PATR5_A Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 6 6.1 12.8 12.8 Zedillo 2 16 16.4 34.2 47.0 Cevallos 3 12 13.1 27.3 74.2 Ninguno 4 2 1.7 3.5 77.8 NS-NC 5 10 10.7 22.2 100.0 . 49 52.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 46 Missing cases 49 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6_A Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 7 6.9 14.4 14.4 Zedillo 2 10 10.4 21.7 36.1 Cevallos 3 12 12.2 25.4 61.5 Ninguno 4 6 6.2 12.9 74.4 NS-NC 5 12 12.3 25.6 100.0 . 49 52.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 46 Missing cases 49 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PATR7_A MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 3 2.7 5.6 5.6 Zedillo 2 19 19.9 41.4 47.0 Cevallos 3 17 17.7 36.9 83.9 Ninguno 4 4 4.6 9.6 93.5 NS-NC 5 3 3.1 6.5 100.0 . 49 52.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 46 Missing cases 49 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8_A PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 3 2.9 6.1 6.1 Zedillo 2 11 11.1 23.1 29.2 Cevallos 3 13 13.5 28.2 57.4 Ninguno 4 11 11.2 23.3 80.7 NS-NC 5 9 9.2 19.3 100.0 . 49 52.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 46 Missing cases 49 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PATR9_A Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 5 4.9 10.2 10.2 Zedillo 2 14 14.7 30.7 40.9 Cevallos 3 16 16.7 34.9 75.8 Ninguno 4 4 4.4 9.3 85.0 NS-NC 5 7 7.2 15.0 100.0 . 49 52.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 46 Missing cases 49 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR1_B Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 5 4.8 9.2 9.2 Zedillo 2 10 10.0 19.3 28.5 Cevallos 3 20 20.9 40.2 68.6 Ninguno 4 1 .7 1.4 70.0 NS-NC 5 15 15.6 30.0 100.0 . 46 47.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 49 Missing cases 46 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PATR2_B mas experiencia gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 11 11.2 21.5 21.5 Zedillo 2 15 16.1 30.9 52.4 Cevallos 3 10 10.4 20.0 72.4 Ninguno 4 9 9.7 18.7 91.1 NS-NC 5 4 4.6 8.9 100.0 . 46 47.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 49 Missing cases 46 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR3_B Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 5 5.2 9.9 9.9 Zedillo 2 13 13.6 26.1 36.0 Cevallos 3 28 29.6 56.9 92.8 NS-NC 5 4 3.7 7.2 100.0 . 46 47.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 49 Missing cases 46 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR4_B Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 14 15.0 28.9 28.9 Zedillo 2 14 14.6 28.1 57.0 Cevallos 3 11 11.5 22.1 79.1 Ninguno 4 2 2.0 3.7 82.8 NS-NC 5 9 9.0 17.2 100.0 . 46 47.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 49 Missing cases 46 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PATR5_B Mejor opción para el país Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 9 9.8 18.8 18.8 Zedillo 2 15 15.7 30.2 49.0 Cevallos 3 13 13.9 26.7 75.6 Ninguno 4 10 10.8 20.8 96.4 NS-NC 5 2 1.9 3.6 100.0 . 46 47.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 49 Missing cases 46 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6_B Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 7 6.9 13.3 13.3 Zedillo 2 8 8.9 17.0 30.4 Cevallos 3 12 12.3 23.6 53.9 Ninguno 4 8 8.5 16.2 70.2 NS-NC 5 15 15.5 29.8 100.0 . 46 47.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 49 Missing cases 46 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PATR7_B MAS PERSON SER PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 5 5.7 10.9 10.9 Zedillo 2 16 17.3 33.3 44.2 Cevallos 3 21 22.5 43.2 87.4 Ninguno 4 2 2.6 4.9 92.3 NS-NC 5 4 4.0 7.7 100.0 . 46 47.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 49 Missing cases 46 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8_B PUEDE RESOVER LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 8 8.1 15.5 15.5 Zedillo 2 12 12.3 23.7 39.2 Cevallos 3 9 9.4 18.1 57.4 Ninguno 4 16 16.7 32.1 89.4 NS-NC 5 5 5.5 10.6 100.0 . 46 47.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 49 Missing cases 46 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PATR9_B Habla mas con la verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cárdenas 1 7 6.9 13.3 13.3 Zedillo 2 10 10.9 21.0 34.3 Cevallos 3 14 15.0 28.9 63.2 Ninguno 4 12 12.5 24.0 87.2 NS-NC 5 6 6.7 12.8 100.0 . 46 47.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 49 Missing cases 46 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT1_A VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 13 13.6 68.0 68.0 DOS 2 3 2.8 13.8 81.8 TRES 3 1 1.0 4.9 86.7 CINCO 5 3 2.7 13.3 100.0 . 76 80.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 19 Missing cases 76 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT2_A VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 10 10.3 27.5 27.5 DOS 2 9 9.3 24.9 52.4 TRES 3 8 8.5 22.8 75.2 CUATRO 4 1 1.1 2.8 78.0 CINCO 5 8 8.2 22.0 100.0 . 59 62.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 36 Missing cases 59 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PVOT3_A VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 8 8.8 28.8 28.8 DOS 2 9 9.4 30.8 59.6 TRES 3 8 8.4 27.3 86.9 CUATRO 4 1 1.1 3.5 90.4 CINCO 5 3 2.9 9.6 100.0 . 66 69.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 29 Missing cases 66 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4_A VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.0 23.4 23.4 UNO 1 3 3.2 76.6 100.0 . 91 95.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 91 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT5_A VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.0 22.9 22.9 UNO 1 2 2.1 48.0 71.0 DOS 2 1 1.2 29.0 100.0 . 91 95.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 91 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PVOT6_A VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.0 27.6 27.6 UNO 1 2 1.9 52.5 80.0 TRES 3 1 .7 20.0 100.0 . 92 96.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 92 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7_A VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.0 25.8 25.8 UNO 1 3 2.8 74.2 100.0 . 91 96.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 91 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT8_A VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.0 100.0 100.0 . 94 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 94 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PVOT9_A VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.0 100.0 100.0 . 94 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 94 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10_A VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.0 100.0 100.0 . 94 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 94 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT11_A VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.0 100.0 100.0 . 94 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 94 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PVOT12_A VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.0 29.0 29.0 CINCO 5 2 2.4 71.0 100.0 . 92 96.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 92 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13_A VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 1.0 44.1 44.1 CINCO 5 1 1.2 55.9 100.0 . 93 97.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 93 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT1_B VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1 .9 4.0 4.0 UNO 1 7 7.0 31.1 35.1 DOS 2 5 5.6 24.8 59.9 TRES 3 1 1.4 6.3 66.2 CUATRO 4 3 3.6 15.7 81.9 CINCO 5 4 4.1 18.1 100.0 . 74 77.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 21 Missing cases 74 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PVOT2_B VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 3 2.8 9.6 9.6 UNO 1 9 9.5 32.0 41.6 DOS 2 5 5.8 19.4 61.0 TRES 3 5 5.2 17.6 78.6 CINCO 5 6 6.4 21.4 100.0 . 67 70.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 28 Missing cases 67 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT3_B VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 6 6.6 25.1 25.1 DOS 2 11 11.8 45.0 70.1 TRES 3 2 1.8 6.8 76.9 CUATRO 4 2 2.0 7.5 84.4 CINCO 5 4 4.1 15.6 100.0 . 70 73.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 25 Missing cases 70 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4_B VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .9 42.0 42.0 CINCO 5 1 1.2 58.0 100.0 . 93 97.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 93 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PVOT5_B VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 1.2 100.0 100.0 . 94 98.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 94 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT6_B VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 5 5.3 85.6 85.6 DOS 2 1 .9 14.4 100.0 . 89 93.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6 Missing cases 89 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7_B VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 2.1 100.0 100.0 . 93 97.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 93 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PVOT8_B VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 95 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 95 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT9_B VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 95 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 95 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10_B VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 95 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 95 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PVOT11_B VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 7 7.1 100.0 100.0 . 88 92.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 7 Missing cases 88 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT12_B VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 3 2.8 100.0 100.0 . 92 97.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 92 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13_B VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 1 .7 100.0 100.0 . 94 99.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 94 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PVOT1 VOTOS A:CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 55 58.3 58.3 58.3 UNO 1 20 20.6 20.6 78.9 DOS 2 8 8.4 8.4 87.3 TRES 3 2 2.4 2.4 89.7 CUATRO 4 3 3.6 3.6 93.3 CINCO 5 6 6.7 6.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT2 VOTOS A:EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 34 35.6 35.6 35.6 UNO 1 19 19.8 19.8 55.5 DOS 2 14 15.1 15.1 70.6 TRES 3 13 13.8 13.8 84.3 CUATRO 4 1 1.1 1.1 85.4 CINCO 5 14 14.6 14.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PVOT3 VOTOS A:DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 41 43.3 43.3 43.3 UNO 1 15 15.4 15.4 58.6 DOS 2 20 21.2 21.2 79.8 TRES 3 10 10.1 10.1 89.9 CUATRO 4 3 3.0 3.0 93.0 CINCO 5 7 7.0 7.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4 VOTOS A:ML del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 90 94.7 94.7 94.7 UNO 1 4 4.1 4.1 98.8 CINCO 5 1 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT5 VOTOS A:RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 91 95.5 95.5 95.5 UNO 1 3 3.2 3.2 98.8 DOS 2 1 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PVOT6 VOTOS A:CS DEL (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 87 91.2 91.2 91.2 UNO 1 7 7.2 7.2 98.4 DOS 2 1 .9 .9 99.3 TRES 3 1 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7 VOTOS A:JGT del PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 90 95.0 95.0 95.0 UNO 1 5 5.0 5.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT8 VOTOS A:APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 95 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PVOT9 VOTOS A:PEM del PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 95 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10 VOTOS A:Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 95 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT11 VOTOS A:A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 88 92.9 92.9 92.9 CINCO 5 7 7.1 7.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 32 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PVOT12 VOTOS A:No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 90 94.8 94.8 94.8 CINCO 5 5 5.2 5.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13 VOTOS A:No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 93 98.0 98.0 98.0 CINCO 5 2 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 28 29.2 29.2 29.2 CCS del PRD 2 15 15.6 15.6 44.8 DFC del PAN 3 26 26.9 26.9 71.7 Otro 4 2 1.9 1.9 73.6 Por ninguno 5 11 11.2 11.2 84.8 No sabe 6 3 3.3 3.3 88.1 No contestó 7 11 11.9 11.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 33 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE PELE_A SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA A Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 13 13.6 28.3 28.3 CCS del PRD 2 5 5.7 11.9 40.2 DFC del PAN 3 12 13.1 27.3 67.4 Otro 4 1 .7 1.5 68.9 Por ninguno 5 3 3.5 7.4 76.3 No sabe 6 2 2.1 4.3 80.6 No contestó 7 9 9.3 19.4 100.0 . 49 52.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 46 Missing cases 49 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE_B SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA B Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 15 15.6 30.0 30.0 CCS del PRD 2 9 9.9 19.1 49.1 DFC del PAN 3 13 13.8 26.5 75.6 Otro 4 1 1.2 2.2 77.9 Por ninguno 5 7 7.7 14.8 92.7 No sabe 6 1 1.2 2.4 95.1 No contestó 7 2 2.6 4.9 100.0 . 46 47.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 49 Missing cases 46 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 34 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 44 46.5 46.5 46.5 femenino 2 51 53.5 53.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 27 28.6 28.6 28.6 26-40 2 36 37.6 37.6 66.2 41-60 3 22 23.5 23.5 89.7 61 + 4 10 10.3 10.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INST Institución donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 45 47.6 47.6 47.6 gob fed 2 7 7.7 7.7 55.4 paraestatal 3 1 1.2 1.2 56.6 emp priv 4 22 23.5 23.5 80.1 negocio prop 5 11 11.6 11.6 91.7 independiente 6 8 8.3 8.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 35 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 21 21.9 46.0 46.0 estudiante 2 15 15.4 32.2 78.3 jubilado 3 8 8.2 17.2 95.5 desemp 4 2 2.1 4.5 100.0 0 50 52.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 45 Missing cases 50 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACTIV Rama de actividad económica Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent industria 2 5 5.5 10.5 10.5 comercio 3 12 13.1 25.0 35.5 construc 4 2 1.8 3.4 38.9 educación 5 4 4.5 8.6 47.5 otros servs 6 26 27.5 52.5 100.0 0 45 47.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 50 Missing cases 45 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUESTO Que puesto ocupa en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario, Patron o 1 5 5.0 9.5 9.5 Directivo o Func de 2 5 4.9 9.3 18.8 Contratista o trabaj 3 8 8.7 16.5 35.3 Profesionista Indepe 4 4 4.3 8.2 43.5 Emplea, trabaj, Obre 5 28 29.6 56.5 100.0 0 45 47.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 50 Missing cases 45 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 36 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent prim inc 2 1 1.2 1.2 1.2 prim comp 3 9 9.2 9.2 10.4 sec incom 4 2 1.7 1.7 12.1 sec comp 5 26 26.9 26.9 38.9 prep incom 6 10 10.7 10.7 49.7 prep comp 7 11 11.4 11.4 61.1 univ incom 8 12 13.1 13.1 74.1 univ comp + 9 25 25.9 25.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1-3 sm 2 16 16.8 16.8 17.9 3-5 sm 3 13 13.2 13.2 31.1 5-7 sm 4 6 6.6 6.6 37.7 7-10 5 17 17.6 17.6 55.3 10 + SM 6 22 23.5 23.5 78.8 7 20 21.2 21.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 95 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 37 ROLLOVER (73) DF 7/AGO/94 TELEFONICA 8/7/94 FRECUENCIAS EN ROL5DF.FRE This procedure was completed at 15:21:27 End of Include file.