The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 1000 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 9852 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 1231 Value Labels for each Variable. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST ESTADO ESTADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TAMAULIPAS 28 1000 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MUN MUNICIPIO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ALDAMA 2 18 1.8 1.8 1.8 ALTAMIRA 3 67 6.7 6.7 8.5 CD.MADERO 9 78 7.8 7.8 16.3 CRUILLAS 10 56 5.6 5.6 21.9 MANTE 21 62 6.2 6.2 28.1 MATAMOROS 22 145 14.5 14.5 42.6 NVO.LAREDO 27 89 8.9 8.9 51.5 REYNOSA 32 46 4.6 4.6 56.0 RIO BRAVO 33 140 14.0 14.0 70.0 TAMPICO 38 114 11.4 11.4 81.5 VALLE HERMOSO 40 53 5.3 5.3 86.8 VICTORIA 41 132 13.2 13.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST ESTRATO ESTRATO SOCIAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUY BAJA 1 37 3.7 3.7 3.7 BAJA 2 355 35.5 35.5 39.2 ALTA 3 228 22.8 22.8 61.9 MUY ALTA 4 215 21.5 21.5 83.4 RURAL 7 166 16.6 16.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1_1 CON QUE FREC/VE NOTICIERO: CON G.ORTEGA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TODOS LOS DIAS 1 270 27.0 27.0 27.0 MAYORIA DE DIAS 2 168 16.8 16.8 43.9 OCASIONALMENTE 3 308 30.8 30.8 74.6 NUNCA 4 244 24.4 24.4 99.0 NS 5 4 .4 .4 99.5 NC 6 5 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1_2 CON QUE FREC/VE NOTICIERO: HECHOS TV AZT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TODOS LOS DIAS 1 206 20.6 20.6 20.6 MAYORIA DE DIAS 2 137 13.7 13.7 34.3 OCASIONALMENTE 3 384 38.4 38.4 72.7 NUNCA 4 256 25.6 25.6 98.2 NS 5 7 .7 .7 99.0 NC 6 10 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST P2 ¿EN CUAL DE ELLOS CONFIA MAS? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CON GUILLERMO ORTEGA 1 321 32.1 32.1 32.1 HECHOS DE TV AZTECA 2 296 29.6 29.6 61.7 NINGUNA DE LAS ANTER 3 128 12.8 12.8 74.5 AMBOS 4 147 14.7 14.7 89.1 NS 5 88 8.8 8.8 98.0 NC 6 20 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MALVSRIE ¿CON CUAL DICHO SE IDENTIFICA MAS? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAS VALE MALO X CONO 1 433 43.3 43.3 43.3 EL QUE NO ARRIEGAS N 2 480 48.0 48.0 91.3 NINGUNA DE LAS ANTER 3 28 2.8 2.8 94.1 AMBOS 4 26 2.6 2.6 96.7 NS 5 31 3.1 3.1 99.8 NC 6 2 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4 LE GUSTA HACER COSAS EMOCIONANTES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 380 38.0 38.0 38.0 A VECES 2 183 18.3 18.3 56.2 NO 3 404 40.4 40.4 96.6 NS 4 30 3.0 3.0 99.6 NC 5 4 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST SITEDO SITUACION ACTUAL DE TAMAULIPAS MEJOR O P Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 330 33.0 33.0 33.0 IGUAL DE BIEN 2 69 6.9 6.9 40.0 IGUAL DE MAL 3 151 15.1 15.1 55.1 PEOR 4 413 41.3 41.3 96.4 NS 5 36 3.6 3.6 99.9 NC 6 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXEDO SITUACION DE TAMAULIPAS DENTRO DE UN AÑO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 342 34.2 34.2 34.2 IGUAL DE BIEN 2 63 6.3 6.3 40.4 IGUAL DE MAL 3 113 11.3 11.3 51.7 PEOR 4 329 32.9 32.9 84.6 NS 5 148 14.8 14.8 99.4 NC 6 6 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST P8 QUIEN LE GUSTARIA COMO PROXIMO GOBERNADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTROS 10 8 .8 .8 .8 PEDRO ETIENE LLANO 11 1 .1 .1 .9 GADALUPE LOPEZ TIJER 12 3 .3 .3 1.2 RIGOBERTO GARZA 13 1 .1 .1 1.3 MANUEL CAVAZOS LERMA 14 3 .3 .3 1.6 MARCO ANTONIO BERNAL 15 7 .7 .7 2.3 JOAQUIN HERNANDEZ 16 6 .6 .6 2.9 GUSTAVO CARDENAS GTZ 17 24 2.4 2.4 5.3 DIORO GUERRA 18 14 1.4 1.4 6.7 TOMAS YARRINGTON 19 18 1.8 1.8 8.5 ANTONIO SANCHEZ G. 20 5 .5 .5 9.0 ANTONIO MARTINEZ TOR 21 10 1.0 1.0 9.9 FERNANDO AZCARRAGA 22 1 .1 .1 10.0 DIEGO ALFONSO HINOJO 23 3 .3 .3 10.3 ALVARO CANTU 24 1 .1 .1 10.4 MA.DEL CARMEN BOLADO 25 3 .3 .3 10.7 RAMON A. SAMPAYO 26 8 .8 .8 11.5 JUAN A. GUAJARDO 27 8 .8 .8 12.3 HORACIO GARZA GARZA 28 9 .9 .9 13.2 HUMBERTO TEJADA LARA 29 1 .1 .1 13.3 MONICA GARCIA VELAZQ 30 4 .4 .4 13.7 RUPERTO VILLAREAL 31 1 .1 .1 13.8 INSUF ESPECIF 97 33 3.3 3.3 17.0 NC 98 29 2.9 2.9 19.9 NS 99 801 80.1 80.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST P9 CUAL ES EL PROBLEMA MAS GRAVE DE TAMAULI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTROS 10 6 .6 .6 .6 DESEMPLEO 11 167 16.7 16.7 17.2 INFLACION 12 22 2.2 2.2 19.4 CORRUPCION 13 43 4.3 4.3 23.7 DELINCUENCIA 14 195 19.5 19.5 43.2 POBREZA 15 11 1.1 1.1 44.4 CRISIS ECONOMICA 16 92 9.2 9.2 53.6 TRANSPORTE 17 7 .7 .7 54.4 SALARIOS BAJOS 18 9 .9 .9 55.2 PAVIMENTACION 19 18 1.8 1.8 57.0 EDUCACION 20 21 2.1 2.1 59.2 DROGADICCION 21 31 3.1 3.1 62.3 FALTA DE SERVICIOS 22 34 3.4 3.4 65.7 ALCOHOLISMO 23 2 .2 .2 65.9 PROSTITUCION 24 1 .1 .1 66.1 DRENAJE 25 12 1.2 1.2 67.3 MAL GOBIERNO 26 29 2.9 2.9 70.2 VIAS DE COMUNICACION 27 8 .8 .8 70.9 AGUA 28 10 1.0 1.0 72.0 PROBLEMAS DEL CAMPO 29 19 1.9 1.9 73.9 VIVIENDA 30 2 .2 .2 74.0 NINGUNO 31 2 .2 .2 74.2 BASURA 32 3 .3 .3 74.5 IMPUESTOS ALTOS 33 3 .3 .3 74.8 PROBL.PART.POLITICOS 34 1 .1 .1 74.9 NARCOTRAFICO 35 5 .5 .5 75.4 PROBL.SINDICATOS 36 2 .2 .2 75.7 CONTAMINACION 37 2 .2 .2 75.9 EMIGRACION 38 1 .1 .1 76.1 FALTA APOYO S.INDUST 39 2 .2 .2 76.3 INSUF ESPECIF 97 13 1.3 1.3 77.6 NC 98 15 1.5 1.5 79.1 NS 99 209 20.9 20.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST CONCAN11 HA OIDO HABLAR DE RAMON A.SAMPAYO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 739 73.9 73.9 73.9 NC 2 1 .1 .1 74.0 SI 3 260 26.0 26.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONCAN12 HA OIDO HABLAR DE ANGEL SIERRA RAMIREZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 922 92.2 92.2 92.2 NC 2 4 .4 .4 92.6 SI 3 74 7.4 7.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONCAN13 HA OIDO HABLAR DE GUSTAVO CARDENAS GUTIE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 666 66.6 66.6 66.6 NC 2 5 .5 .5 67.1 SI 3 329 32.9 32.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST CONCAN14 HA OIDO HABLAR DE MA.DEL CARMEN BOLADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 816 81.6 81.6 81.6 NC 2 5 .5 .5 82.1 SI 3 179 17.9 17.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONCAN15 HA OIDO HABLAR DE DIEGO ALONSO HINOJOSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 783 78.3 78.3 78.3 NC 2 4 .4 .4 78.8 SI 3 212 21.2 21.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI11 OPINION TIENE DE RAMON A.SAMPAYO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 72 7.2 27.5 27.5 REGULAR 2 85 8.5 32.9 60.5 MALA 3 16 1.6 6.3 66.8 NS/NC 4 86 8.6 33.2 100.0 0 740 74.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 260 Missing cases 740 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST CANOPI12 OPINION TIENE DE ANGEL SIERRA RAMIREZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 19 1.9 26.1 26.1 REGULAR 2 25 2.5 34.0 60.0 MALA 3 8 .8 10.5 70.5 NS/NC 4 22 2.2 29.5 100.0 0 926 92.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 74 Missing cases 926 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI13 OPINION TIENE DE GUSTAVO CARDENAS GUTIER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 150 15.0 45.7 45.7 REGULAR 2 76 7.6 23.2 68.9 MALA 3 22 2.2 6.7 75.7 NS/NC 4 80 8.0 24.3 100.0 0 671 67.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 329 Missing cases 671 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI14 OPINION TIENE DE MA.DEL CARMEN BOLADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 70 7.0 39.1 39.1 REGULAR 2 43 4.3 24.0 63.1 MALA 3 16 1.6 8.9 72.0 NS/NC 4 50 5.0 28.0 100.0 0 821 82.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 179 Missing cases 821 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST CANOPI15 OPINION TIENE DE DIEGO ALONSO HINOJOSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 76 7.6 35.9 35.9 REGULAR 2 49 4.9 22.9 58.8 MALA 3 33 3.3 15.8 74.6 NS/NC 4 54 5.4 25.4 100.0 0 788 78.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 212 Missing cases 788 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P11 UNICOS CANDIDATOS PAN ¿A QUIEN PREFERIRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent RAMON A.SAMPAYO 1 70 7.0 7.0 7.0 ANGEL SIERRA RAMIREZ 2 6 .6 .6 7.6 GUSTAVO CARDENAS GUT 3 164 16.4 16.4 24.0 MA.DEL CARMEN BOLADO 4 44 4.4 4.4 28.3 DIEGO ALONSO HINOJOS 5 44 4.4 4.4 32.7 NO LOS CONOCE LO SUF 6 440 44.0 44.0 76.7 NINGUNO 7 118 11.8 11.8 88.5 NS 8 112 11.2 11.2 99.7 NC 9 3 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST PACU ACUERDO COMO ESTA GOBERNANDO PDTE ZEDILL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 481 48.1 48.1 48.1 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 231 23.1 23.1 71.2 DESACUERDO EN PARTE 3 43 4.3 4.3 75.5 DESACUERDO 4 199 19.9 19.9 95.3 NS 5 44 4.4 4.4 99.7 NC 6 3 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDIP CUANTOS AÑOS DURA UN DIPUTADO EN SU CARG Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 3 AÑOS 1 330 33.0 33.0 33.0 OTRO 2 174 17.4 17.4 50.4 NS 3 474 47.4 47.4 97.8 NC 4 22 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONCAN21 HA OIDO HABLAR DE ANTONIO MARTINES TORRE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 847 84.7 84.7 84.7 SI 3 153 15.3 15.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST CONCAN22 HA OIDO HABLAR DE DIORO GUERRA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 836 83.6 83.6 83.6 NC 2 1 .1 .1 83.7 SI 3 163 16.3 16.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONCAN23 HA OIDO HABLAR DE ANTONIO SANCHEZ GOCHIC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 763 76.3 76.3 76.3 SI 3 237 23.7 23.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONCAN24 HA OIDO HABLAR DE TOMAS YARRINGTON RUVAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 703 70.3 70.3 70.3 NC 2 1 .1 .1 70.4 SI 3 296 29.6 29.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST CANOPI21 OPINION TIENE DE ANTONIO MARTINES TORRES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 60 6.0 39.1 39.1 REGULAR 2 38 3.8 24.9 64.0 MALA 3 23 2.3 15.1 79.2 NS/NC 4 32 3.2 20.8 100.0 0 847 84.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 153 Missing cases 847 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI22 OPINION TIENE DE DIORO GUERRA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 52 5.2 31.8 31.8 REGULAR 2 39 3.9 23.7 55.5 MALA 3 12 1.2 7.7 63.1 NS/NC 4 60 6.0 36.9 100.0 0 837 83.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 163 Missing cases 837 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI23 OPINION TIENE DE ANTONIO SANCHEZ GOCHICO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 71 7.1 30.0 30.0 REGULAR 2 47 4.7 20.0 49.9 MALA 3 26 2.6 10.9 60.9 NS/NC 4 93 9.3 39.1 100.0 0 763 76.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 237 Missing cases 763 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST CANOPI24 OPINION TIENE DE TOMAS YARRINGTON RUVALC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 100 10.0 33.9 33.9 REGULAR 2 77 7.7 26.0 59.9 MALA 3 31 3.1 10.6 70.6 NS/NC 4 87 8.7 29.4 100.0 0 704 70.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 296 Missing cases 704 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PGOB NOMBRE DEL GOBERNADOR ACTUAL DE TAMAULIP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CORRECTO 1 765 76.5 76.5 76.5 INCORRECTO 2 88 8.8 8.8 85.3 NS 3 139 13.9 13.9 99.2 NC 4 8 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXCAM MAS IMPORTANTE EN EL PROXIMO GOBERNANDOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXPER PARA GOBERNAR 1 547 54.7 54.7 54.7 OPCION DE CAMBIO 2 363 36.3 36.3 91.0 NINGUNA 3 41 4.1 4.1 95.1 NS 4 46 4.6 4.6 99.8 NC 5 2 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST CONCAN31 HA OIDO HABLAR DE MARCO ANTONIO BERNAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 785 78.5 78.5 78.5 NC 2 1 .1 .1 78.7 SI 3 213 21.3 21.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONCAN32 HA OIDO HABLAR DE OSCAR LUEBBERT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 842 84.2 84.2 84.2 NC 2 1 .1 .1 84.3 SI 3 157 15.7 15.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONCAN33 HA OIDO HABLAR DE HUGO A.ARAUJO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 725 72.5 72.5 72.5 NC 2 2 .2 .2 72.6 SI 3 274 27.4 27.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST CONCAN34 HA OIDO HABLAR DE LAURA A.GARZA GALINDO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 819 81.9 81.9 81.9 NC 2 1 .1 .1 82.0 SI 3 180 18.0 18.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI31 OPINION TIENE DE MARCO ANTONIO BERNAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 65 6.5 30.4 30.4 REGULAR 2 51 5.1 24.0 54.4 MALA 3 17 1.7 8.2 62.6 NS/NC 4 80 8.0 37.4 100.0 0 787 78.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 213 Missing cases 787 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI32 OPINION TIENE DE OSCAR LUEBBERT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 52 5.2 33.3 33.3 REGULAR 2 40 4.0 25.6 58.9 MALA 3 14 1.4 9.0 67.9 NS/NC 4 50 5.0 32.1 100.0 0 843 84.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 157 Missing cases 843 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST CANOPI33 OPINION TIENE DE HUGO A.ARAUJO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 69 6.9 25.1 25.1 REGULAR 2 75 7.5 27.5 52.6 MALA 3 31 3.1 11.4 64.0 NS/NC 4 99 9.9 36.0 100.0 0 726 72.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 274 Missing cases 726 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI34 OPINION TIENE DE LAURA A.GARZA GALINDO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 60 6.0 33.3 33.3 REGULAR 2 46 4.6 25.7 58.9 MALA 3 23 2.3 12.9 71.8 NS/NC 4 51 5.1 28.2 100.0 0 820 82.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 180 Missing cases 820 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 32 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST P18 UNICOS CANDIDATOS PRI ¿A QUIEN PREFERIRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ANTONIO MARTINEZ TOR 1 31 3.1 3.1 3.1 DIORO GUERRA 2 24 2.4 2.4 5.5 ANTONIO SANCHEZ G 3 42 4.2 4.2 9.7 TOMAS YARRINGTON R 4 75 7.5 7.5 17.2 MARCO A. BERNAL 5 23 2.3 2.3 19.4 OSCAR LUEBBERT 6 18 1.8 1.8 21.2 HUGO ANDRES ARAUJO 7 18 1.8 1.8 23.0 LAURA A.GARZA GALIND 8 44 4.4 4.4 27.4 NO LOS CONOCE LO SUF 9 400 40.0 40.0 67.4 NINGUNO 10 165 16.5 16.5 83.9 NS 11 155 15.5 15.5 99.5 NC 12 5 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P18_A ¿POR CUAL DE ELLOS SE INCLINARIA MAS? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ANTONIO MARTINEZ TOR 1 10 1.0 2.6 2.6 DIORO GUERRA 2 1 .1 .2 2.8 ANTONIO SANCHEZ G 3 1 .1 .3 3.1 TOMAS YARRINGTON R 4 8 .8 2.0 5.1 MARCO A. BERNAL 5 2 .2 .5 5.6 OSCAR LUEBBERT 6 5 .5 1.3 6.9 LAURA A.GARZA GALIND 8 6 .6 1.5 8.4 9 0 .0 .1 8.5 NINGUNO 10 58 5.8 14.6 23.1 NS 11 265 26.5 66.3 89.4 NC 12 42 4.2 10.6 100.0 0 600 60.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 400 Missing cases 600 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 33 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST PACUG ACUERDO CON EL GOBERNADOR MANUEL BARTLET Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 577 57.7 57.7 57.7 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 192 19.2 19.2 76.9 DESACUERDO EN PARTE 3 25 2.5 2.5 79.5 DESACUERDO 4 164 16.4 16.4 95.9 NS 5 41 4.1 4.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONCAN41 HA OIDO HABLAR DE PEDRO ETIENNE LLANO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 929 92.9 92.9 92.9 NC 2 2 .2 .2 93.1 SI 3 69 6.9 6.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONCAN42 HA OIDO HABLAR DE JOAQUIN HERNANDEZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 751 75.1 75.1 75.1 NC 2 3 .3 .3 75.4 SI 3 246 24.6 24.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 34 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST CONCAN43 HA OIDO HABLAR DE JUAN A.GUAJARDO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 769 76.9 76.9 76.9 NC 2 4 .4 .4 77.2 SI 3 228 22.8 22.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONCAN44 HA OIDO HABLAR DE CARLOS HEREDIA ZUBIETA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 909 90.9 90.9 90.9 NC 2 5 .5 .5 91.4 SI 3 86 8.6 8.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI41 OPINION TIENE DE PEDRO ETIENNE LLANO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 12 1.2 17.4 17.4 REGULAR 2 22 2.2 32.4 49.7 MALA 3 11 1.1 15.3 65.0 NS/NC 4 24 2.4 35.0 100.0 0 931 93.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 69 Missing cases 931 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 35 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST CANOPI42 OPINION TIENE DE JOAQUIN HERNANDEZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 110 11.0 44.6 44.6 REGULAR 2 55 5.5 22.4 67.1 MALA 3 14 1.4 5.6 72.7 NS/NC 4 67 6.7 27.3 100.0 0 754 75.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 246 Missing cases 754 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI43 OPINION TIENE DE JUAN A.GUAJARDO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 84 8.4 36.9 36.9 REGULAR 2 67 6.7 29.4 66.2 MALA 3 15 1.5 6.8 73.0 NS/NC 4 61 6.1 27.0 100.0 0 772 77.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 228 Missing cases 772 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI44 OPINION TIENE DE CARLOS HEREDIA ZUBIETA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 18 1.8 20.8 20.8 REGULAR 2 23 2.3 26.4 47.2 MALA 3 13 1.3 14.8 62.0 NS/NC 4 33 3.3 38.0 100.0 0 914 91.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 914 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 36 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST P21 UNICOS CANDIDATOS PRD ¿A QUIEN PREFERIRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PEDRO ETIENNE LLANO 1 24 2.4 2.4 2.4 JOAQUIN HERNADEZ COR 2 114 11.4 11.4 13.8 JUAN A. GUAJARDO 3 88 8.8 8.8 22.6 CARLOS HEREDIA ZUBIE 4 19 1.9 1.9 24.5 NO LOS CONOCE SUFICI 5 503 50.3 50.3 74.8 NINGUNO 6 124 12.4 12.4 87.2 NS 7 126 12.6 12.6 99.7 NC 8 3 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INDEPAR NORMALMENTE USTED SE CONSIDERA... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PANISTA 1 133 13.3 13.3 13.3 PRIISTA 2 368 36.8 36.8 50.1 PERREDISTA 3 94 9.4 9.4 59.5 DE OTRO PARTIDO 4 3 .3 .3 59.8 NO SE INDETIFICA CON 5 369 36.9 36.9 96.7 NC 6 33 3.3 3.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 37 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST PCAM CUALES SON LAS CAMARAS QUE TIEN EL C.U. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DIPUTADOS Y SENADORE 1 266 26.6 26.6 26.6 DIPUTADOS 2 102 10.2 10.2 36.8 SENADORES 3 18 1.8 1.8 38.6 OTRO 4 16 1.6 1.6 40.2 NS 5 579 57.9 57.9 98.1 NC 6 19 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRIHEAD1 CANDIDATOS GCG, MAB, JHC ¿X CUAL VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GCG DEL PAN 1 192 19.2 19.2 19.2 MAB DEL PRI 2 303 30.3 30.3 49.4 JHC DEL PRD 3 162 16.2 16.2 65.7 NINGUNO 4 119 11.9 11.9 77.6 NS 5 207 20.7 20.7 98.3 NC 6 17 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COSTUVOT ¿CUAL SE ACERCA MAS A LO QUE PIENSA? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SIEMPRE VOTA X MISMO 1 461 46.1 46.1 46.1 A VECES VOTA X UNO 2 398 39.8 39.8 85.9 NINGUNA DE LAS DOS 3 97 9.7 9.7 95.6 NS 4 37 3.7 3.7 99.3 NC 5 7 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 38 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST TRIHEAD2 CANDIDATOS GCG, TY, JHC ¿X CUAL VOTARIA? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GCG DEL PAN 1 192 19.2 19.2 19.2 TY DEL PRI 2 332 33.2 33.2 52.4 JHC DEL PRD 3 166 16.6 16.6 69.0 NINGUNO 4 102 10.2 10.2 79.2 NS 5 189 18.9 18.9 98.1 NC 6 19 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRIHEAD3 CANDIDATOS GCG, ASG, JHC ¿X CUAL VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACG DEL PAN 1 223 22.3 22.3 22.3 ASG DEL PRI 2 286 28.6 28.6 50.9 JHC DEL PRD 3 157 15.7 15.7 66.6 NINGUNO 4 115 11.5 11.5 78.1 NS 5 204 20.4 20.4 98.5 NC 6 15 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P28_1 OPINION TIENE DE HUELGAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUY BUENA 1 52 5.2 5.2 5.2 BUENA 2 434 43.4 43.4 48.6 MALA 3 347 34.7 34.7 83.3 MUY MALA 4 29 2.9 2.9 86.2 NS/NC 5 138 13.8 13.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 39 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST P28_2 OPINION TIENE DE EMPRESARIOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUY BUENA 1 33 3.3 3.3 3.3 BUENA 2 388 38.8 38.8 42.1 MALA 3 289 28.9 28.9 71.0 MUY MALA 4 31 3.1 3.1 74.1 NS/NC 5 259 25.9 25.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P28_3 OPINION TIENE DE PRIVATIZACION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUY BUENA 1 19 1.9 1.9 1.9 BUENA 2 263 26.3 26.3 28.1 MALA 3 350 35.0 35.0 63.2 MUY MALA 4 56 5.6 5.6 68.8 NS/NC 5 312 31.2 31.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P28_4 OPINION TIENE DE SUBCOMANDANTE MARCOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUY BUENA 1 43 4.3 4.3 4.3 BUENA 2 183 18.3 18.3 22.7 MALA 3 303 30.3 30.3 53.0 MUY MALA 4 128 12.8 12.8 65.7 NS/NC 5 343 34.3 34.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 40 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST TRIHEAD4 CANDIDATOS GCG, DG, JHC ¿X CUAL VOTARIA? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GCG DEL PAN 1 214 21.4 21.4 21.4 DG DEL PRI 2 289 28.9 28.9 50.3 JHC DEL PRD 3 172 17.2 17.2 67.5 NINGUNO 4 114 11.4 11.4 78.8 NS 5 200 20.0 20.0 98.9 NC 6 11 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_1 VOTOS: PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 700 70.0 70.0 70.0 UNO 1 44 4.4 4.4 74.4 DOS 2 69 6.9 6.9 81.3 TRES 3 33 3.3 3.3 84.6 CUATRO 4 8 .8 .8 85.4 CINCO 5 146 14.6 14.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 41 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST PVOT_2 VOTOS: PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 563 56.3 56.3 56.3 UNO 1 33 3.3 3.3 59.6 DOS 2 60 6.0 6.0 65.7 TRES 3 46 4.6 4.6 70.3 CUATRO 4 7 .7 .7 71.0 CINCO 5 290 29.0 29.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_3 VOTOS: PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 983 98.3 98.3 98.3 UNO 1 13 1.3 1.3 99.6 TRES 3 1 .1 .1 99.7 CINCO 5 3 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_4 VOTOS: PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 776 77.6 77.6 77.6 UNO 1 62 6.2 6.2 83.7 DOS 2 33 3.3 3.3 87.1 TRES 3 18 1.8 1.8 88.8 CUATRO 4 6 .6 .6 89.4 CINCO 5 106 10.6 10.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 42 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST PVOT_5 VOTOS: PC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 992 99.2 99.2 99.2 UNO 1 8 .8 .8 99.9 CINCO 5 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_6 VOTOS: PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 996 99.6 99.6 99.6 UNO 1 4 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_7 VOTOS: PT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 995 99.5 99.5 99.5 UNO 1 5 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 43 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST PVOT_8 VOTOS: PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 994 99.4 99.4 99.4 UNO 1 4 .4 .4 99.8 CINCO 5 2 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_9 VOTOS: OTRO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 994 99.4 99.4 99.4 UNO 1 3 .3 .3 99.6 CINCO 5 4 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_10 VOTOS: ABSTENCION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 925 92.5 92.5 92.5 UNO 1 5 .5 .5 92.9 DOS 2 2 .2 .2 93.1 TRES 3 2 .2 .2 93.3 CUATRO 4 2 .2 .2 93.6 CINCO 5 64 6.4 6.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 44 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST PVOT_11 VOTOS: N/S Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 816 81.6 81.6 81.6 UNO 1 2 .2 .2 81.8 DOS 2 3 .3 .3 82.2 CINCO 5 178 17.8 17.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_12 VOTOS: N/C Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 975 97.5 97.5 97.5 CINCO 5 25 2.5 2.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P29_1 ¿POR CUAL PARTIDO NUNCA VOTARIA? PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 218 21.8 21.8 21.8 NO MENCION 2 782 78.2 78.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 45 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST P29_2 ¿POR CUAL PARTIDO NUNCA VOTARIA? PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 282 28.2 28.2 28.2 NO MENCION 2 718 71.8 71.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P29_3 ¿POR CUAL PARTIDO NUNCA VOTARIA? PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 293 29.3 29.3 29.3 NO MENCION 2 707 70.7 70.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P29_4 ¿POR CUAL PARTIDO NUNCA VOTARIA? PT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 465 46.5 46.5 46.5 NO MENCION 2 535 53.5 53.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 46 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST P30 EN QUE MEDIO DE COMUNICACION CONFIA MAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PERIODICO 1 71 7.1 7.1 7.1 TELEVISION 2 722 72.2 72.2 79.3 RADIO 3 128 12.8 12.8 92.1 NINGUNO 4 71 7.1 7.1 99.2 NS 5 7 .7 .7 99.9 NC 6 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P30_1 PERIODICO ¿CUAL? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTROS 10 4 .4 6.0 6.0 EL EXTRA 11 0 .0 .6 6.5 EL SOL 12 15 1.5 21.7 28.3 EL GRAFICO 13 2 .2 2.5 30.7 EL DIARIO DE TAMPICO 14 11 1.1 15.5 46.2 EL EXPRESO 15 6 .6 8.0 54.2 MERCURIO 16 11 1.1 15.8 70.1 EL TIEMPO 17 1 .1 1.7 71.8 EL NORTE DE NVO.LEON 18 4 .4 5.2 77.0 EL NACIONAL 19 0 .0 .6 77.6 MAÑANA REYNOSA 20 9 .9 12.9 90.5 EL BRAVO 21 1 .1 1.1 91.6 DIARIO OF.FEDERACION 22 1 .1 1.9 93.5 INSUF ESPECIF 97 2 .2 2.4 95.9 NC 98 2 .2 2.4 98.3 NS 99 1 .1 1.7 100.0 0 929 92.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 71 Missing cases 929 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 47 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST P31 PARTIDO MAS POSIBILIDADES DE GANAR ELEC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 154 15.4 15.4 15.4 PRI 2 488 48.8 48.8 64.2 PRD 3 98 9.8 9.8 74.0 OTRO 4 5 .5 .5 74.6 NS 5 243 24.3 24.3 98.9 NC 6 11 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 489 48.9 48.9 48.9 femenino 2 511 51.1 51.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 294 29.4 29.4 29.4 26-40 2 351 35.1 35.1 64.5 41-60 3 255 25.5 25.5 90.0 61 + 4 100 10.0 10.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 48 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST ESCOL Escolaridad entrevistado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 52 5.2 5.2 5.2 prim inc 2 205 20.5 20.5 25.7 prim comp 3 182 18.2 18.2 43.9 Sec o Carr Téc incom 4 77 7.7 7.7 51.6 Sec o Carr Téc compl 5 162 16.2 16.2 67.8 Prepa o Carr Téc inc 6 103 10.3 10.3 78.2 Prepa o Carr Téc com 7 114 11.4 11.4 89.5 Universidad incomple 8 39 3.9 3.9 93.5 Universidad Completa 9 65 6.5 6.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 49 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST ESCOL_1 Que carrera o estudios hizo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LIC CONTADURIA 60 17 1.7 16.3 16.3 LIC DERECHO 61 8 .8 8.1 24.4 LIC ADMON EMPRESAS 62 7 .7 6.5 30.9 QUIMICO 64 2 .2 2.0 32.9 MEDICO VETERINARIO 65 2 .2 2.0 35.0 MEDICO 66 6 .6 5.3 40.3 ARQUITECTURA 67 1 .1 1.3 41.6 ODONTOLOGIA 70 5 .5 4.4 46.1 ING MECANICO 73 2 .2 2.3 48.3 ING INFORMATICA O SI 74 6 .6 5.5 53.9 ING AGRONOMO 75 4 .4 3.6 57.5 LIC ECONOMIA 76 2 .2 2.0 59.5 ING CIVIL 79 5 .5 4.7 64.2 ING INDUSTRIAL 80 2 .2 1.7 65.9 LIC RELACIONES COMER 83 1 .1 1.2 67.1 LIC PEDAGOGIA 84 1 .1 1.3 68.3 LIC CIENCIAS POLITIC 92 1 .1 .7 69.0 LIC EN EDUCACION 96 6 .6 5.5 74.5 LIC EN COMERCIO EXTE 97 2 .2 1.7 76.1 TEOLOGIA 98 2 .2 1.9 78.0 QUIMICO FARMACEUTICO 101 2 .2 2.1 80.2 RELACIONES INTERNACI 103 0 .0 .5 80.6 LIC EN ENFERMERIA 106 5 .5 5.0 85.6 ANTROPOLOGIA 110 2 .2 1.8 87.3 MAESTRIA EN ADMINIST 122 1 .1 .7 88.0 LIC CIENCIAS SOCIALE 131 0 .0 .3 88.3 ING SIST INTEGRAL SE 135 1 .1 .6 88.9 QUIMICO AGRICOLA 162 1 .1 .8 89.7 INSUFICIENTE ESPECIF 997 2 .2 1.7 91.3 NC 998 4 .4 3.6 94.9 NS 999 5 .5 5.1 100.0 0 895 89.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 105 Missing cases 895 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 50 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST SE4 Actividad la semana pasada... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Trabajó 1 421 42.1 42.1 42.1 Vacaciones (incap) 2 6 .6 .6 42.7 Ama de casa 3 387 38.7 38.7 81.3 Estudiante 4 99 9.9 9.9 91.2 Jubilado/Pensionado 5 43 4.3 4.3 95.6 Desempleado 6 35 3.5 3.5 99.0 Incapacitado Permane 7 10 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE5 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1000 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE6 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1000 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1000 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 51 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST SE7 Que es usted en el lugar donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Dueño 1 65 6.5 15.2 15.2 Trabajador Independ 2 77 7.7 18.1 33.2 Directivo 3 5 .5 1.2 34.5 Empleado 4 209 20.9 49.0 83.4 Obrero 5 36 3.6 8.5 92.0 CAMPESINO 95 34 3.4 8.0 100.0 0 573 57.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 427 Missing cases 573 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE8 Cuantos empleados tiene la empresa...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHICA 1 771 77.1 77.1 77.1 MEDIANA 2 55 5.5 5.5 82.7 GRANDE 3 58 5.8 5.8 88.4 MUY GRANDE 4 102 10.2 10.2 98.6 NC 998 4 .4 .4 99.0 NS 999 10 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 52 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST SE9 En que NIVEL se considera que esta usted Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Nivel A 1 242 24.2 61.6 61.6 Nivel B 2 28 2.8 7.2 68.8 Nivel C 3 63 6.3 16.2 85.0 Nivel D 4 25 2.5 6.3 91.3 Nivel E 5 16 1.6 4.0 95.3 Nivel F 6 8 .8 2.0 97.2 Nivel G 7 1 .1 .3 97.5 Nivel H 8 3 .3 .8 98.3 Ns 9 6 .6 1.5 99.9 Nc 10 1 .1 .1 100.0 0 608 60.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 392 Missing cases 608 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE10 Pertenece a algún sindicato Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 87 8.7 22.2 22.2 No 2 301 30.1 76.8 99.1 Nc 3 4 .4 .9 100.0 0 608 60.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 392 Missing cases 608 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE11 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1000 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1000 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 53 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST SE11_1 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1000 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE11_2 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1000 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE12 Institución en donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent gob fed 1 46 4.6 11.7 11.7 paraestatal 2 15 1.5 3.9 15.6 emp priv 3 173 17.3 44.2 59.8 negocio prop 4 103 10.3 26.2 86.0 independiente 5 53 5.3 13.6 99.7 Ns 7 1 .1 .3 100.0 0 608 60.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 392 Missing cases 608 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 54 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST SE13 Actividad de la empresa donde trabaja... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Agricultura 1 38 3.8 8.9 8.9 Pesca 2 10 1.0 2.3 11.2 Industrias 3 74 7.4 17.3 28.5 Comercio 4 113 11.3 26.6 55.1 Construccion 5 37 3.7 8.6 63.7 Educacion 6 12 1.2 2.9 66.6 Servicios 7 139 13.9 32.7 99.3 Nc 8 1 .1 .3 99.6 Ns 9 2 .2 .4 100.0 0 573 57.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 427 Missing cases 573 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE14 Usted es propietario de tierra que traba Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si es propietario 1 19 1.9 50.7 50.7 No es propietario 2 16 1.6 41.8 92.5 Nc 3 3 .3 7.5 100.0 0 962 96.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 38 Missing cases 962 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 55 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST SE14_1 Su propiedad es de que tipo...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Ejidal 1 11 1.1 48.5 48.5 Comunal 2 5 .5 24.8 73.3 Privada/Peq Propiet 3 3 .3 13.8 87.1 Ns 4 3 .3 12.9 100.0 0 978 97.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 22 Missing cases 978 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE14_2 Que es usted jornalero o peon...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Jornalero 1 10 1.0 62.9 62.9 Peon 2 6 .6 37.1 100.0 0 984 98.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 16 Missing cases 984 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE142A Otro (especifique)... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1000 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1000 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 56 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST INGRE Rango ingreso familiar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 146 14.6 14.6 14.6 1-3 sm 2 499 49.9 49.9 64.6 3-5 sm 3 192 19.2 19.2 83.8 5-7 sm 4 60 6.0 6.0 89.8 7-10 sm 5 38 3.8 3.8 93.6 10-30 sm 6 32 3.2 3.2 96.7 30 + sm 7 3 .3 .3 97.0 Ns/Nc 8 30 3.0 3.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE16 Cuantas personas dependen de ingr famili Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 32 3.2 3.2 3.2 2-3 2 321 32.1 32.1 35.3 4-5 3 430 43.0 43.0 78.4 6 o MAS 4 216 21.6 21.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE17 Tiene telefono en su casa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 358 35.8 35.8 35.8 No 2 636 63.6 63.6 99.4 Nc 3 6 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 57 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST PELE HOY ELEC GOB TAM ¿X CUAL PARTIDO VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 179 17.9 17.9 17.9 PRI 2 384 38.4 38.4 56.4 PPS 3 1 .1 .1 56.5 PRD 4 128 12.8 12.8 69.2 PC 5 3 .3 .3 69.5 PDM 7 1 .1 .1 69.6 PT 8 2 .2 .2 69.9 PVEM 9 3 .3 .3 70.2 OTRO 10 4 .4 .4 70.6 NINGUNO 11 70 7.0 7.0 77.6 NS 12 180 18.0 18.0 95.6 NC-BLANCO 13 40 4.0 4.0 99.6 ANULADO 14 4 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 58 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST This procedure was completed at 12:48:59 The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 1000 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 9852 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 1231 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE HOY ELEC GOB TAM ¿X CUAL PARTIDO VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 179 17.9 17.9 17.9 PRI 2 384 38.4 38.4 56.4 PRD 4 128 12.8 12.8 69.1 OTRO 10 14 1.4 1.4 70.6 NINGUNO 11 70 7.0 7.0 77.6 NS 12 180 18.0 18.0 95.6 NC-BLANCO 13 44 4.4 4.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 59 PRE-ELECTORAL TAMAULIPAS CAM(ESTATAL) FEB/98 3/2/98 FRECUENCIAS TAM PONDERADAS EN (TAM10298) FRECPOND.LST This procedure was completed at 12:49:03