***** Memory allows a total of 9998 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 1249 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1 SIT PERSONAL MEJOR QUE HACE UN AÑO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 235 11.9 11.9 11.9 IGUAL 2 472 23.8 23.8 35.7 PEOR 3 1232 62.2 62.2 97.9 N/S 4 32 1.6 1.6 99.5 N/C 5 9 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 SITUACION AÑO QUE ENTRA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 326 16.5 16.5 16.5 IGUAL 2 529 26.7 26.7 43.2 PEOR 3 916 46.2 46.2 89.4 N/S 4 193 9.7 9.7 99.1 N/C 5 17 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 130 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P2_1 ¿POR QUE? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LA DEVALUACION 1 187 9.4 20.4 20.4 LA CRISIS ECO 2 318 16.1 34.7 55.2 BAJOS SALARIOS 3 167 8.4 18.3 73.4 MAL GOBIERNO 4 150 7.6 16.3 89.8 OTROS 10 2 .1 .3 90.0 DESEMPLEO 11 14 .7 1.6 91.6 DEUDA EXTERNA 12 2 .1 .2 91.8 13 1 .0 .1 91.9 20 1 .0 .1 92.0 21 1 .0 .1 92.1 30 2 .1 .3 92.3 31 3 .1 .3 92.6 40 1 .0 .1 92.7 INSUFICIENTE ESPEC 97 9 .4 1.0 93.7 N/C 98 49 2.5 5.4 99.0 N/S 99 9 .4 1.0 100.0 0 1065 53.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 916 Missing cases 1065 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PPOL SITUACION POLITICA ESTADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TRANQUILA 1 316 15.9 15.9 15.9 PELIGROSA 2 525 26.5 26.5 42.4 PREOCUPANTE 3 944 47.7 47.7 90.1 MEJOR QUE ANTES 4 98 5.0 5.0 95.1 OTRA 5 18 .9 .9 96.0 N/S 6 37 1.9 1.9 97.8 N/C 7 43 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 131 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P4 PROBLEMA MAS GRAVE ESTADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DESEMPLEO 1 198 10.0 10.0 10.0 SEGURIDAD PUBLICA 2 193 9.7 9.7 19.7 CRISIS ECO 3 372 18.8 18.8 38.5 CONTAMINACION 4 23 1.2 1.2 39.7 INFLACION 5 98 5.0 5.0 44.7 POBREZA 6 65 3.3 3.3 47.9 AGUA 7 2 .1 .1 48.0 DEVALUACION 8 411 20.8 20.8 68.8 EDUCACION 9 10 .5 .5 69.3 SALARIOS BAJOS 10 279 14.1 14.1 83.4 MAL GOBIERNO 11 164 8.3 8.3 91.6 PARTIDOS POLITICOS 12 40 2.0 2.0 93.7 CONFLICTO DE CHIAPAS 13 10 .5 .5 94.2 OTROS 14 7 .4 .4 94.5 SOBREPOBLACION 15 2 .1 .1 94.6 SERV PUBLICOS 16 8 .4 .4 95.0 DEUDA EXT 17 2 .1 .1 95.1 NARCOTRAFICO 18 11 .6 .6 95.7 CORRUPCION 19 9 .4 .4 96.1 20 3 .1 .1 96.2 21 7 .3 .3 96.6 25 0 .0 .0 96.6 30 5 .3 .3 96.8 INSUFICIENTE ESPEC 97 7 .4 .4 97.2 N/C 98 19 1.0 1.0 98.2 N/S 99 36 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 ELEC BCN PROXIMAMENTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 1596 80.6 80.6 80.6 NO 2 363 18.3 18.3 98.9 NC 3 22 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 132 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P6_1 AUTORIDADES ELEGIR: PRESIDENTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 104 5.3 6.5 6.5 NO MENCION 2 1492 75.3 93.5 100.0 0 385 19.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1596 Missing cases 385 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6_2 AUTORIDADES ELEGIR: GOBERNADOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 1321 66.7 82.8 82.8 NO MENCION 2 275 13.9 17.2 100.0 0 385 19.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1596 Missing cases 385 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6_3 AUTORIDADES ELEGIR: PDTE MUNICIPAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 921 46.5 57.7 57.7 NO MENCION 2 675 34.1 42.3 100.0 0 385 19.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1596 Missing cases 385 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 133 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P6_4 AUTORIDADES ELEGIR: DIPUTADOS LOCALES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 483 24.4 30.3 30.3 NO MENCION 2 1113 56.2 69.7 100.0 0 385 19.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1596 Missing cases 385 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6_5 AUTORIDADES ELEGIR: DIPUTADOS FEDERALES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 86 4.3 5.4 5.4 NO MENCION 2 1510 76.2 94.6 100.0 0 385 19.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1596 Missing cases 385 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6_6 AUTORIDADES ELEGIR: SENADORES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 57 2.9 3.6 3.6 NO MENCION 2 1539 77.7 96.4 100.0 0 385 19.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1596 Missing cases 385 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 134 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P6_7 AUTORIDADES ELEGIR: TODOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 18 .9 1.2 1.2 NO MENCION 2 1578 79.6 98.8 100.0 0 385 19.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1596 Missing cases 385 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6_8 AUTORIDADES ELEGIR: N/S Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 95 4.8 6.0 6.0 NO MENCION 2 1501 75.8 94.0 100.0 0 385 19.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1596 Missing cases 385 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6_9 AUTORIDADES ELEGIR: N/C Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 42 2.1 2.6 2.6 NO MENCION 2 1554 78.4 97.4 100.0 0 385 19.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1596 Missing cases 385 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 135 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE PELE POR CUAL PARTIDO VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 717 36.2 36.2 36.2 PRI 2 639 32.3 32.3 68.5 PRD 4 102 5.2 5.2 73.7 OTRO 10 131 6.6 6.6 80.3 NINGUNO 11 139 7.0 7.0 87.3 N/S 12 252 12.7 12.7 100.0 0 1 .0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1980 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7 BAJA CALIFORNIA MEJORADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent HA MEJORADO 1 807 40.7 40.7 40.7 NO HA CAMBIADO 2 675 34.1 34.1 74.8 HA EMPEORADO 3 370 18.7 18.7 93.5 N/S 4 104 5.2 5.2 98.7 N/C 5 26 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8 NOMBRE PRECANDIDATOS GOBERNATURA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 1032 52.1 52.1 52.1 NO 2 822 41.5 41.5 93.6 N/S 3 97 4.9 4.9 98.5 N/C 4 31 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 136 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P8_1 ¿QUIEN? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTROS 10 3 .2 .3 .3 HECTOR TERAN T 11 599 30.2 58.0 58.4 ALEJANDRO DE LA V 12 2 .1 .2 58.6 HUGO ABEL CASTRO 13 48 2.4 4.7 63.3 CARLOS BUSTAMANTE A 14 47 2.4 4.6 67.9 ARREDONDO 15 1 .0 .1 68.0 AMADOR RODRIGUEZ L 16 67 3.4 6.5 74.4 MILTON EMILIO CAST 17 9 .5 .9 75.3 JESUS GONZALEZ 18 1 .0 .1 75.4 JAIME OZUNA 19 4 .2 .4 75.8 FRANCISCO PEREZ TEJA 20 70 3.5 6.8 82.6 RENE TREVIÑO 21 2 .1 .1 82.8 ROJAS GUTIERREZ 22 2 .1 .2 83.0 RAFAEL GARCIA V 23 3 .2 .3 83.3 ELURDY EUGENIO 24 10 .5 1.0 84.3 EDUARDO MTNEZ PALOME 25 12 .6 1.2 85.5 ANTONIO MEZA 26 4 .2 .4 85.9 FERNANDO GALLEGOS S 27 4 .2 .4 86.3 PEREZ CANCHOLA 28 6 .3 .6 86.9 JUAN GOMEZ 29 2 .1 .2 87.1 RUBEN ADAME 30 1 .1 .1 87.2 CESAR MORENO ESCOBAR 31 1 .1 .1 87.3 CHACON 32 0 .0 .0 87.3 FERREIRO ALFREDO 33 0 .0 .0 87.4 ELIAS CALLES 34 2 .1 .1 87.5 RAMON RUBIO 35 1 .1 .1 87.6 ENCISO 37 1 .0 .1 87.7 PALACIOS 39 1 .0 .1 87.7 MTNEZ VELOZ 40 1 .0 .1 87.8 MONTENEGRO 41 1 .0 .1 87.9 GUILEVANDO SILVA 43 1 .0 .1 87.9 INSUFICIENTE ESPEC 97 4 .2 .4 88.3 N/S 98 43 2.1 4.1 92.4 N/C 99 78 3.9 7.6 100.0 0 949 47.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1032 Missing cases 949 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 137 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P8_2 ¿QUIEN? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent HECTOR TERAN T 11 77 3.9 24.6 24.6 ALEJANDRO DE LA V 12 8 .4 2.5 27.1 HUGO ABEL CASTRO 13 27 1.4 8.8 36.0 CARLOS BUSTAMANTE A 14 29 1.5 9.2 45.2 AMADOR RODRIGUEZ L 16 40 2.0 12.9 58.1 MILTON EMILIO CAST 17 18 .9 5.9 64.0 JESUS GONZALEZ 18 1 .0 .3 64.3 JAIME OZUNA 19 3 .1 .9 65.2 FRANCISCO PEREZ TEJA 20 50 2.5 16.0 81.2 RENE TREVIÑO 21 4 .2 1.3 82.5 ROJAS GUTIERREZ 22 2 .1 .6 83.2 RAFAEL GARCIA V 23 3 .2 1.0 84.2 ELURDY EUGENIO 24 14 .7 4.5 88.7 EDUARDO MTNEZ PALOME 25 16 .8 5.3 94.0 ANTONIO MEZA 26 4 .2 1.3 95.3 FERNANDO GALLEGOS S 27 2 .1 .6 95.9 PEREZ CANCHOLA 28 5 .2 1.5 97.4 RUBEN ADAME 30 1 .1 .4 97.9 CESAR MORENO ESCOBAR 31 1 .1 .3 98.2 CHACON 32 0 .0 .1 98.3 FERREIRO ALFREDO 33 0 .0 .1 98.3 ELIAS CALLES 34 2 .1 .6 98.9 MANUEL REYES 36 1 .1 .3 99.2 ROSAS MORENO 38 1 .1 .3 99.6 CHAPELA 42 1 .1 .4 100.0 0 1670 84.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 311 Missing cases 1670 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 138 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P8A_1 ¿PARTIDO PERTENECE? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 621 31.3 68.5 68.5 PRI 2 220 11.1 24.3 92.7 PRD 3 8 .4 .8 93.6 OTRO 4 6 .3 .7 94.3 N/S 5 33 1.7 3.6 97.9 N/C 6 19 1.0 2.1 100.0 0 1074 54.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 907 Missing cases 1074 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8A_2 ¿PARTIDO PERTENECE? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 85 4.3 27.4 27.4 PRI 2 190 9.6 61.1 88.5 PRD 3 6 .3 1.9 90.3 N/S 5 19 1.0 6.2 96.5 N/C 6 11 .6 3.5 100.0 0 1670 84.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 311 Missing cases 1670 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9_1 OIDO HABLAR..HECTOR TERAN TERAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 1216 61.4 61.4 61.4 NO 2 765 38.6 38.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 139 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P9_2 OIDO HABLAR..CARLOS BUSTAMANTE ANCHONDO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 430 21.7 21.7 21.7 NO 2 1551 78.3 78.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9_3 OIDO HABLAR..MILTON EMILIO CASTELLANOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 606 30.6 30.6 30.6 NO 2 1375 69.4 69.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9_4 OIDO HABLAR..HUGO ABEL CASTRO BOJORQUEZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 531 26.8 26.8 26.8 NO 2 1450 73.2 73.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 140 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P9_5 OIDO HABLAR..ALEGANDRO DE LA VEGA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 172 8.7 8.7 8.7 NO 2 1809 91.3 91.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9_6 OIDO HABLAR..FERNANDO GALLEGOS SALAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 144 7.3 7.3 7.3 NO 2 1837 92.7 92.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9_7 OIDO HABLAR..EDUARDO MARTINEZ PALOMERA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 417 21.0 21.0 21.0 NO 2 1564 79.0 79.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 141 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P9_8 OIDO HABLAR..ANTONIO MEZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 146 7.4 7.4 7.4 NO 2 1835 92.6 92.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9_9 OIDO HABLAR..FRANCISCO PEREZ TEJADA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 717 36.2 36.2 36.2 NO 2 1264 63.8 63.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9_10 OIDO HABLAR..AMADOR RODRIGUEZ LOZANO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 566 28.6 28.6 28.6 NO 2 1415 71.4 71.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 142 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P10_1 OPINION DE..HECTOR TERAN TERAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 623 31.5 51.3 51.3 REGURAL 2 346 17.4 28.4 79.7 MALA 3 64 3.2 5.2 84.9 NS/NC 4 183 9.2 15.1 100.0 0 765 38.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1216 Missing cases 765 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P10_2 OPINION DE..CARLOS BUSTAMANTE ANCHONDO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 181 9.1 42.0 42.0 REGURAL 2 164 8.3 38.1 80.1 MALA 3 27 1.4 6.4 86.4 NS/NC 4 59 3.0 13.6 100.0 0 1551 78.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 430 Missing cases 1551 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P10_3 OPINION DE..MILTON EMILIO CASTELLANOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 171 8.6 28.2 28.2 REGURAL 2 191 9.7 31.6 59.8 MALA 3 148 7.5 24.4 84.2 NS/NC 4 96 4.8 15.8 100.0 0 1375 69.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 606 Missing cases 1375 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 143 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P10_4 OPINION DE..HUGO ABEL CASTRO BOJORQUEZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 180 9.1 33.9 33.9 REGURAL 2 186 9.4 35.1 68.9 MALA 3 84 4.2 15.8 84.7 NS/NC 4 81 4.1 15.3 100.0 0 1450 73.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 531 Missing cases 1450 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P10_5 OPINION DE..ALEGANDRO DE LA VEGA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 42 2.1 24.5 24.5 REGURAL 2 62 3.2 36.2 60.7 MALA 3 30 1.5 17.7 78.4 NS/NC 4 37 1.9 21.6 100.0 0 1809 91.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 172 Missing cases 1809 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P10_6 OPINION DE..FERNANDO GALLEGOS SALAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 38 1.9 26.6 26.6 REGURAL 2 44 2.2 30.4 57.0 MALA 3 21 1.1 14.7 71.7 NS/NC 4 41 2.1 28.3 100.0 0 1837 92.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 144 Missing cases 1837 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 144 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P10_7 OPINION DE..EDUARDO MARTINEZ PALOMERA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 153 7.7 36.6 36.6 REGURAL 2 169 8.5 40.5 77.1 MALA 3 45 2.3 10.8 87.8 NS/NC 4 51 2.6 12.2 100.0 0 1564 79.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 417 Missing cases 1564 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P10_8 OPINION DE..ANTONIO MEZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 38 1.9 26.1 26.1 REGURAL 2 57 2.9 39.1 65.2 MALA 3 16 .8 11.2 76.4 NS/NC 4 34 1.7 23.6 100.0 0 1835 92.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 146 Missing cases 1835 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P10_9 OPINION DE..FRANCISCO PEREZ TEJADA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 402 20.3 56.0 56.0 REGURAL 2 190 9.6 26.4 82.5 MALA 3 47 2.4 6.5 89.0 NS/NC 4 79 4.0 11.0 100.0 0 1264 63.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 717 Missing cases 1264 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 145 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P10_10 OPINION DE..AMADOR RODRIGUEZ LOZANO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 255 12.9 45.0 45.0 REGURAL 2 170 8.6 30.1 75.1 MALA 3 52 2.6 9.2 84.3 NS/NC 4 89 4.5 15.7 100.0 0 1415 71.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 566 Missing cases 1415 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P11 CANDIDATOS PRI GOB FUERAN... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CARLOS BUSTAMANTE AN 1 138 7.0 7.0 7.0 MILTON EMILIO CASTEL 2 56 2.8 2.8 9.8 HUGO ABEL CASTRO BOJ 3 99 5.0 5.0 14.8 ALEJANDRO DE LA VEGA 4 26 1.3 1.3 16.1 FERNANDO GALLEGOS SA 5 9 .5 .5 16.6 EDURDO MARTINEZ PALO 6 91 4.6 4.6 21.2 ANTONIO MEZA 7 16 .8 .8 22.0 FRANCISCO PEREZ TEJA 8 256 12.9 12.9 34.9 AMADOR RODRIGUEZ LOZ 9 149 7.5 7.5 42.4 NO LOS CONOCE SUFICI 10 679 34.3 34.3 76.7 NINGUNO 11 462 23.3 23.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 146 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P11_1 ¿POR CUAL SE INCLINARIA MAS? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CARLOS BUSTAMANTE AN 1 44 2.2 6.5 6.5 MILTON EMILIO CASTEL 2 12 .6 1.7 8.2 HUGO ABEL CASTRO BOJ 3 34 1.7 5.0 13.2 ALEJANDRO DE LA VEGA 4 10 .5 1.4 14.6 FERNANDO GALLEGOS SA 5 2 .1 .2 14.9 EDURDO MARTINEZ PALO 6 7 .4 1.1 15.9 ANTONIO MEZA 7 6 .3 .9 16.9 FRANCISCO PEREZ TEJA 8 55 2.8 8.2 25.0 AMADOR RODRIGUEZ LOZ 9 46 2.3 6.8 31.8 N/S 10 378 19.1 55.7 87.5 N/C 11 85 4.3 12.5 100.0 0 1302 65.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 679 Missing cases 1302 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_1 VOTOS: PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1027 51.9 51.9 51.9 UNO 1 112 5.7 5.7 57.5 DOS 2 161 8.1 8.1 65.7 TRES 3 113 5.7 5.7 71.4 CUATRO 4 91 4.6 4.6 76.0 CINCO 5 476 24.0 24.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 147 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE PVOT_2 VOTOS: PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1100 55.5 55.5 55.5 UNO 1 141 7.1 7.1 62.6 DOS 2 130 6.6 6.6 69.2 TRES 3 106 5.3 5.3 74.6 CUATRO 4 75 3.8 3.8 78.3 CINCO 5 429 21.7 21.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_3 VOTOS: PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1724 87.0 87.0 87.0 UNO 1 126 6.4 6.4 93.4 DOS 2 24 1.2 1.2 94.6 TRES 3 18 .9 .9 95.5 CUATRO 4 14 .7 .7 96.2 CINCO 5 75 3.8 3.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 148 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE PVOT_4 VOTOS: OTRO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1863 94.1 94.1 94.1 UNO 1 29 1.5 1.5 95.6 DOS 2 14 .7 .7 96.3 TRES 3 3 .1 .1 96.4 CUATRO 4 3 .2 .2 96.6 CINCO 5 67 3.4 3.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_5 VOTOS: ABSTENCION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1778 89.7 89.7 89.7 UNO 1 33 1.7 1.7 91.4 DOS 2 4 .2 .2 91.6 TRES 3 2 .1 .1 91.7 CUATRO 4 6 .3 .3 92.0 CINCO 5 159 8.0 8.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 149 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE PVOT_6 VOTOS: N/S Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1769 89.3 89.3 89.3 UNO 1 10 .5 .5 89.8 DOS 2 3 .1 .1 90.0 TRES 3 2 .1 .1 90.1 CUATRO 4 1 .1 .1 90.1 CINCO 5 196 9.9 9.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_7 VOTOS: N/C Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1924 97.1 97.1 97.1 UNO 1 1 .1 .1 97.2 CINCO 5 56 2.8 2.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 150 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE PW_1 VOTOS: A.. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TRES 3 5 .3 4.4 4.4 CINCO 5 5 .3 4.3 8.6 6 4 .2 3.6 12.2 7 2 .1 1.7 13.9 8 32 1.6 27.4 41.4 9 11 .6 9.3 50.7 10 15 .8 13.1 63.8 11 1 .1 1.0 64.8 12 6 .3 4.8 69.6 13 36 1.8 30.4 100.0 0 1863 94.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 118 Missing cases 1863 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P12 REPRESENTA OPCION CAMBIO GOB PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GOBERNADOR DEL PRI 1 597 30.1 30.1 30.1 GOBERNADOR DEL PAN 2 710 35.8 35.8 66.0 NINGUNO 3 379 19.1 19.1 85.1 OTRO 4 45 2.3 2.3 87.4 N/S 5 203 10.3 10.3 97.7 N/C 6 46 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 151 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P13 IMPORTANTE PROXIMO GOB EXPERIENCIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXPERIENCIA E INTELI 1 1057 53.3 53.3 53.3 OPCION DE CAMBIO 2 702 35.5 35.5 88.8 NINGUNA 3 115 5.8 5.8 94.6 N/S 4 80 4.1 4.1 98.6 N/C 5 27 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P14 BUENO PRI RECUPERE GOBERNATURA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENO 1 519 26.2 26.2 26.2 BUENO EN PARTE 2 434 21.9 21.9 48.1 MALO 3 716 36.1 36.1 84.3 N/S 4 278 14.0 14.0 98.3 N/C 5 34 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P15 IMPORTANTE GOB BUSQUE SEPARARSE GOBFED Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent QUE BUSQUE SEPARARSE 1 450 22.7 22.7 22.7 QUE BUSQUE ACERCARSE 2 1239 62.5 62.5 85.2 N/S 3 242 12.2 12.2 97.5 N/C 4 50 2.5 2.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 152 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P16 CANDIDATOS FUERAN PAN Y PRI VOTARIA POR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CANDIDATO DEL PAN 1 739 37.3 37.3 37.3 CANDIDATO DEL PRI 2 651 32.9 32.9 70.1 NINGUNO DE LOS DOS 3 338 17.1 17.1 87.2 N/S 4 207 10.5 10.5 97.7 N/C 5 46 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P17 CON CUAL OPCION ESTA MAS ACUERDO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TODO ES CULPA DEL GO 1 1059 53.5 53.5 53.5 TENEMOS GOB QUE MERE 2 589 29.7 29.7 83.2 N/S 3 256 12.9 12.9 96.1 N/C 4 77 3.9 3.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P18_1 ERA REALIZADO CAMBIOS IMPORTANTES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CIERTO 1 832 42.0 42.0 42.0 CIERTO EN PARTE 2 547 27.6 27.6 69.6 FALSO 3 412 20.8 20.8 90.5 N/S 4 173 8.7 8.7 99.2 N/C 5 16 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 153 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P18_2 MAS VALE MALO POR CONOCIDO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CIERTO 1 576 29.1 29.1 29.1 CIERTO EN PARTE 2 380 19.2 19.2 48.3 FALSO 3 825 41.6 41.6 89.9 N/S 4 173 8.7 8.7 98.7 N/C 5 26 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P18_3 ERA DEFRAUDO CIUDADANOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CIERTO 1 594 30.0 30.0 30.0 CIERTO EN PARTE 2 471 23.8 23.8 53.7 FALSO 3 684 34.5 34.5 88.3 N/S 4 211 10.6 10.6 98.9 N/C 5 21 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P19 SITUACION ACTUAL ESTADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 391 19.7 19.7 19.7 IGUAL 2 629 31.7 31.7 51.5 PEOR 3 793 40.0 40.0 91.5 N/S 4 127 6.4 6.4 97.9 N/C 5 41 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 154 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P20 ACUERDO CON AFIRMACION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 946 47.7 47.7 47.7 DESACUERDO 2 576 29.1 29.1 76.8 N/S 3 390 19.7 19.7 96.5 N/C 4 69 3.5 3.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P21_1 ACUERDO MANERA GOB...PDTE REPUBLICA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 1018 51.4 51.4 51.4 DESACUERDO 2 708 35.7 35.7 87.1 N/S 3 214 10.8 10.8 97.9 N/C 4 41 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P21_2 ACUERDO MANERA GOB...GOBERNADOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 1009 50.9 50.9 50.9 DESACUERDO 2 665 33.6 33.6 84.5 N/S 3 251 12.7 12.7 97.2 N/C 4 56 2.8 2.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 155 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P21_3 ACUERDO MANERA GOB...PDTE MUNICIPAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 1003 50.7 50.7 50.7 DESACUERDO 2 616 31.1 31.1 81.7 N/S 3 301 15.2 15.2 96.9 N/C 4 61 3.1 3.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P22_1 GOB ER MEJOR QUE..ROBERTO DE LA MADRID Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 819 41.3 41.3 41.3 IGUAL 2 464 23.4 23.4 64.7 PEOR 3 271 13.7 13.7 78.4 NS/NC 4 353 17.8 17.8 96.3 NO CONOCE 5 74 3.7 3.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P22_2 GOB ER MEJOR QUE..XICOTENCATL LEYVA MORT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 852 43.0 43.0 43.0 IGUAL 2 468 23.6 23.6 66.6 PEOR 3 240 12.1 12.1 78.7 NS/NC 4 355 17.9 17.9 96.6 NO CONOCE 5 66 3.4 3.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 156 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P22_3 GOB ER MEJOR QUE..OSCAR BAYLON CHACON Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 708 35.8 35.8 35.8 IGUAL 2 500 25.3 25.3 61.0 PEOR 3 249 12.6 12.6 73.6 NS/NC 4 434 21.9 21.9 95.5 NO CONOCE 5 89 4.5 4.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23_1 COMPARANDO ERA PARECE..MAS SENCILLO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent XICOTENCATL LEYVA MO 1 209 10.6 10.6 10.6 OSCAR BAYLON CACON 2 207 10.4 10.4 21.0 NINGUNO 3 400 20.2 20.2 41.2 N/S 4 360 18.2 18.2 59.4 N/C 5 94 4.7 4.7 64.1 6 711 35.9 35.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23_2 COMPARANDO ERA PARECE..MAS CERCANO AL PU Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent XICOTENCATL LEYVA MO 1 150 7.6 7.6 7.6 OSCAR BAYLON CACON 2 254 12.8 12.8 20.4 NINGUNO 3 450 22.7 22.7 43.1 N/S 4 369 18.6 18.6 61.7 N/C 5 91 4.6 4.6 66.3 6 667 33.7 33.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 157 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P23_3 COMPARANDO ERA PARECE..QUE HABLA CON LA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent XICOTENCATL LEYVA MO 1 122 6.2 6.2 6.2 OSCAR BAYLON CACON 2 198 10.0 10.0 16.2 NINGUNO 3 556 28.1 28.1 44.3 N/S 4 395 19.9 19.9 64.2 N/C 5 98 5.0 5.0 69.2 6 611 30.8 30.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23_4 COMPARANDO ERA PARECE..ENTIENDE PROBLEMA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent XICOTENCATL LEYVA MO 1 133 6.7 6.7 6.7 OSCAR BAYLON CACON 2 222 11.2 11.2 17.9 NINGUNO 3 476 24.1 24.1 42.0 N/S 4 412 20.8 20.8 62.8 N/C 5 113 5.7 5.7 68.5 6 624 31.5 31.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 158 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P23_5 COMPARANDO ERA PARECE..MAS PERSONALIDAD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent XICOTENCATL LEYVA MO 1 209 10.6 10.6 10.6 OSCAR BAYLON CACON 2 195 9.8 9.8 20.4 NINGUNO 3 444 22.4 22.4 42.8 N/S 4 439 22.2 22.2 65.0 N/C 5 116 5.9 5.9 70.8 6 578 29.2 29.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23_6 COMPARANDO ERA PARECE..REALIZADO OBRAS I Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent XICOTENCATL LEYVA MO 1 103 5.2 5.2 5.2 OSCAR BAYLON CACON 2 142 7.2 7.2 12.4 NINGUNO 3 429 21.7 21.7 34.0 N/S 4 437 22.1 22.1 56.1 N/C 5 124 6.3 6.3 62.4 6 746 37.6 37.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P24 ACUERDO CON MEDIDAS PARA ENFRENTAR CRISI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 953 48.1 48.1 48.1 DESACUERDO 2 779 39.3 39.3 87.4 N/S 3 185 9.3 9.3 96.7 N/C 4 65 3.3 3.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 159 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P25_1 MANIFESTAR DESACUERDO..FIRMAR CARTAS PRO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 545 27.5 69.9 69.9 SI EN PARTE 2 100 5.1 12.9 82.8 NO 3 96 4.9 12.4 95.1 NS/NC 4 38 1.9 4.9 100.0 0 1202 60.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 779 Missing cases 1202 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P25_2 MANIFESTAR DESACUERDO..MARCHAS, MITINES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 339 17.1 43.5 43.5 SI EN PARTE 2 185 9.3 23.7 67.2 NO 3 204 10.3 26.2 93.4 NS/NC 4 51 2.6 6.6 100.0 0 1202 60.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 779 Missing cases 1202 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P25_3 MANIFESTAR DESACUERDO..BLOQUER CAMINOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 197 9.9 25.3 25.3 SI EN PARTE 2 184 9.3 23.6 48.9 NO 3 331 16.7 42.6 91.4 NS/NC 4 67 3.4 8.6 100.0 0 1202 60.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 779 Missing cases 1202 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 160 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P25_4 MANIFESTAR DESACUERDO..TOMAR OFICINAS GO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 161 8.1 20.6 20.6 SI EN PARTE 2 166 8.4 21.4 42.0 NO 3 368 18.6 47.2 89.2 NS/NC 4 84 4.2 10.8 100.0 0 1202 60.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 779 Missing cases 1202 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P25_5 MANIFESTAR DESACUERDO..APOYAR GPO ARMADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 144 7.3 18.6 18.6 SI EN PARTE 2 136 6.9 17.4 36.0 NO 3 409 20.7 52.6 88.6 NS/NC 4 88 4.5 11.4 100.0 0 1203 60.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 778 Missing cases 1203 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P26 TEME PERDER EMPLEO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 1161 58.6 58.6 58.6 NO 2 706 35.7 35.7 94.2 N/S 3 85 4.3 4.3 98.5 N/C 4 29 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 161 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P27 CONOCE ALGUIEN QUEDADO SIN TRABAJO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 1017 51.4 51.4 51.4 NO 2 869 43.8 43.8 95.2 N/S 3 71 3.6 3.6 98.8 N/C 4 24 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PAIS MEDIDAS ECONOMICAS ADECUADAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ADECUADAS 1 687 34.7 34.7 34.7 ALGUNAS ADECUADAS 2 626 31.6 31.6 66.3 INADECUADAS 3 491 24.8 24.8 91.1 N/S 4 151 7.6 7.6 98.8 N/C 5 25 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PERS ADECUADAS RESOLVER SITECO PERSONAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ADECUADAS 1 480 24.2 24.2 24.2 ALGUNAS ADECUADAS 2 544 27.4 27.4 51.7 INADECUADAS 3 753 38.0 38.0 89.7 N/S 4 159 8.0 8.0 97.7 N/C 5 45 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 162 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE P30 CONFIA EN CAPACIDAD EZP RESOLVER CRISIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI CONFIA 1 966 48.8 48.8 48.8 TIENE DUDA 2 710 35.9 35.9 84.6 N/S 3 233 11.8 11.8 96.4 N/C 4 71 3.6 3.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P30_1 ¿POR QUE TIENE DUDAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTROS 10 14 .7 2.0 2.0 NO PARA DEVALUACION 11 15 .8 2.1 4.1 ES INSEGURO 12 57 2.9 8.1 12.2 MALAS MEDIDAS ECON 13 80 4.0 11.3 23.5 FALTA DE CAPACIDAD 14 67 3.4 9.5 32.9 GOB MALO 15 51 2.6 7.2 40.1 TODOS PDTES IGUALES 16 24 1.2 3.3 43.4 ES CORRUPTO 17 33 1.7 4.7 48.1 FALTA CONFIANZA 18 18 .9 2.5 50.7 PORQUE ES DEL PRI 19 34 1.7 4.7 55.4 NO DICE VERDAD 20 19 1.0 2.7 58.0 EMPEZO MAL 21 16 .8 2.2 60.3 ESTA MANIPULADO 22 33 1.7 4.6 64.9 GRANDE EL PUESTO PAR 23 11 .6 1.5 66.4 FALTA DEMOCRACIA 24 3 .1 .4 66.8 NO CUMPLE 25 20 1.0 2.9 69.7 ES PREMATURO 26 11 .6 1.6 71.2 MALOS COLABORADORES 27 8 .4 1.1 72.4 52 2 .1 .2 72.6 INSUF ESPEC 97 11 .5 1.5 74.1 N/C 98 73 3.7 10.3 84.5 N/S 99 110 5.6 15.5 100.0 0 1271 64.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 710 Missing cases 1271 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 163 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE PSIM SIMPATIZA CANDIDATOS ELEC 1994 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DFC 1 682 34.4 34.4 34.4 EZP 2 727 36.7 36.7 71.2 CCS 3 170 8.6 8.6 79.7 OTRO 4 84 4.2 4.2 84.0 NINGUNO 5 201 10.1 10.1 94.1 N/S 6 77 3.9 3.9 98.0 N/C 7 39 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P32 CAMBIO PREFERENCIA ELECTORAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 226 11.4 11.4 11.4 NO 2 1547 78.1 78.1 89.5 NO SIMPATIZO NINGUN 3 159 8.0 8.0 97.6 N/C 4 48 2.4 2.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P33 CON CUAL PARTIDO SIMPATIZA MAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 41 2.1 18.2 18.2 PRI 2 128 6.5 56.5 74.7 PRD 3 10 .5 4.3 79.0 OTRO 4 26 1.3 11.7 90.7 N/C 5 21 1.1 9.3 100.0 0 1755 88.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 226 Missing cases 1755 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 164 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 1004 50.7 50.7 50.7 femenino 2 977 49.3 49.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 660 33.3 33.3 33.3 26-40 2 753 38.0 38.0 71.3 41-60 3 415 20.9 20.9 92.2 61 + 4 154 7.8 7.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INST Institución donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 839 42.4 42.4 42.4 gob fed 2 156 7.9 7.9 50.2 paraestatal 3 44 2.2 2.2 52.4 emp priv 4 651 32.9 32.9 85.3 negocio prop 5 191 9.7 9.7 95.0 independiente 6 99 5.0 5.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 165 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 485 24.5 57.7 57.7 estudiante 2 154 7.8 18.3 76.1 jubilado 3 81 4.1 9.6 85.7 desemp 4 103 5.2 12.3 98.0 otro 5 17 .9 2.0 100.0 0 1142 57.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 839 Missing cases 1142 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUESTO Que puesto ocupa en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario, Patron o 1 82 4.2 7.2 7.2 Directivo o Func de 2 69 3.5 6.1 13.3 Contratista o trabaj 3 151 7.6 13.2 26.5 Profesionista Indepe 4 76 3.9 6.7 33.2 Emplea, trabaj, Obre 5 752 37.9 65.8 99.0 trabajador sin pago 6 10 .5 .9 99.9 No contesto 98 1 .0 .1 100.0 0 839 42.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1142 Missing cases 839 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 166 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE PJ TRABAJA EN MEX O E.U Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EN MEXICO 1 1045 52.7 91.5 91.5 EN E.U. 2 60 3.1 5.3 96.8 AMBOS 3 17 .9 1.5 98.3 N/S 4 2 .1 .1 98.4 N/C 5 18 .9 1.6 100.0 0 839 42.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1142 Missing cases 839 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 66 3.3 3.3 3.3 prim inc 2 197 9.9 9.9 13.2 prim comp 3 182 9.2 9.2 22.5 sec incom 4 195 9.8 9.8 32.3 sec comp 5 359 18.1 18.1 50.4 prep incom 6 328 16.5 16.5 67.0 prep comp 7 287 14.5 14.5 81.4 univ incom 8 247 12.5 12.5 93.9 univ comp + 9 121 6.1 6.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 167 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 143 7.2 7.2 7.2 1-3 sm 2 614 31.0 31.0 38.2 3-5 sm 3 616 31.1 31.1 69.4 5-7 sm 4 325 16.4 16.4 85.8 7-10 5 178 9.0 9.0 94.8 10 + SM 6 102 5.2 5.2 99.9 7 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PL PERSONAS DEPENDEN DE INGRESO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNA PERS 1 130 6.6 6.6 6.6 2 PERS 2 301 15.2 15.2 21.8 3 PERS 3 450 22.7 22.7 44.5 4 PERS 4 439 22.2 22.2 66.7 5 PERS 5 289 14.6 14.6 81.3 6 PERS 6 192 9.7 9.7 90.9 7 PERS 7 85 4.3 4.3 95.2 8 PERS 8 43 2.2 2.2 97.4 9 PERS 9 9 .4 .4 97.8 10 PERS 10 9 .5 .5 98.3 12 2 .1 .1 98.4 13 1 .1 .1 98.5 15 1 .1 .1 98.5 17 1 .0 .0 98.6 20 7 .3 .3 98.9 21 1 .1 .1 99.0 30 2 .1 .1 99.1 41 1 .1 .1 99.1 64 2 .1 .1 99.2 90 1 .1 .1 99.3 N/C 98 15 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 168 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE TEL CUENTA CON TELEFONO EN CASA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 1008 50.9 50.9 50.9 NO 2 956 48.3 48.3 99.2 N/C 3 17 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PK ORIGINARIO DE BAJA CALIFORNIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 988 49.9 49.9 49.9 NO 2 993 50.1 50.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PK_1 HACE CUANTOS AÑOS VIVE EN BCN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MENOS DE UN AÑO 1 33 1.7 3.3 3.3 DE UN AÑO A TRES 2 99 5.0 9.9 13.2 DE CUATRO A SEIS AÑO 3 172 8.7 17.3 30.5 DE SEIS A DIEZ AÑOS 4 232 11.7 23.3 53.8 MAS DE DIEZ AÑOS 5 385 19.4 38.6 92.4 N/C 6 76 3.8 7.6 100.0 0 984 49.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 997 Missing cases 984 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 169 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE PK_2 LUGAR DE ORIGEN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGS 1 0 .0 .0 .0 BCS 3 11 .5 1.1 1.1 COA 5 10 .5 1.0 2.1 COL 6 19 1.0 1.9 4.0 CHS 7 17 .9 1.7 5.7 CHI 8 16 .8 1.6 7.2 DF 9 64 3.2 6.4 13.7 DGO 10 48 2.4 4.8 18.5 GTO 11 15 .8 1.5 20.0 GRO 12 22 1.1 2.3 22.3 HGO 13 6 .3 .6 22.9 JAL 14 100 5.1 10.0 32.9 MEX 15 3 .1 .3 33.2 MIC 16 74 3.7 7.4 40.6 MOR 17 5 .2 .5 41.1 NAY 18 61 3.1 6.2 47.3 NLN 19 9 .5 .9 48.2 OAX 20 32 1.6 3.2 51.3 PUE 21 26 1.3 2.6 53.9 QRO 22 7 .3 .7 54.6 SLP 24 5 .2 .5 55.1 SIN 25 194 9.8 19.5 74.5 SON 26 135 6.8 13.6 88.1 TAM 28 11 .6 1.1 89.2 TLX 29 9 .5 .9 90.2 VER 30 26 1.3 2.6 92.7 YUC 31 10 .5 1.0 93.7 ZAC 32 32 1.6 3.2 96.9 EXTRANJ 33 13 .7 1.3 98.3 N/C 98 17 .9 1.7 100.0 0 984 49.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1981 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 997 Missing cases 984 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 170 BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE / ABRIL 95 CAMPO 4/11/95 FRECUENCIAS BCN PONDERADO EN BCN10495.FRE This procedure was completed at 13:32:26