The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 599 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 7289 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 911 Value Labels for each Variable. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATH Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DDF50297 600 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESTADO ESTADO... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DISTRITO FEDERAL 9 600 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST MUN DELEGACION... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 2 30 5.0 5.0 5.0 3 49 8.2 8.2 13.2 5 76 12.7 12.7 25.9 6 21 3.5 3.5 29.4 7 123 20.5 20.5 49.9 8 10 1.7 1.7 51.6 10 38 6.4 6.4 58.0 11 39 6.5 6.5 64.4 12 28 4.7 4.7 69.1 13 10 1.6 1.6 70.8 14 31 5.2 5.2 75.9 15 76 12.6 12.6 88.5 16 18 3.1 3.1 91.6 17 50 8.4 8.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1_1 AUTORIDAD A ELEGIR...REGENTE (JEFE GOBNO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 320 53.4 53.4 53.4 NO MENCION 2 280 46.6 46.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST P1_2 AUTORIDAD A ELEGIR...SENADOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 32 5.4 5.4 5.4 NO MENCION 2 568 94.6 94.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1_3 AUTORIDAD A ELEGIR...DIP FEDERAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 65 10.8 10.8 10.8 NO MENCION 2 535 89.2 89.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1_4 AUTORIDAD A ELEGIR...ASAMBLEISTA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 12 2.1 2.1 2.1 NO MENCION 2 588 97.9 97.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST P1_5 AUTORIDAD A ELEGIR...OTRO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 13 2.1 2.1 2.1 NO MENCION 2 587 97.9 97.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P3 HA ESCUCHADO NOMBRE DE POSIBLE CANDIDATO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 385 64.2 64.2 64.2 NO 2 208 34.7 34.7 98.9 NS 3 5 .8 .8 99.7 NC 4 2 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P3_1 HA ESCUCHADO DE..PORFIRIO MUÑOZ LEDO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 202 33.7 52.6 52.6 NO MENCION 2 183 30.5 47.4 100.0 0 215 35.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 385 Missing cases 215 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST P3_2 HA ESCUCHADO DE..FCO JOSE PAOLI BOLIO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 52 8.7 13.5 13.5 NO MENCION 2 333 55.5 86.5 100.0 0 215 35.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 385 Missing cases 215 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P3_3 HA ESCUCHADO DE..ALFREDO DEL MAZO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 232 38.7 60.3 60.3 NO MENCION 2 153 25.5 39.7 100.0 0 215 35.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 385 Missing cases 215 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P3_4 HA ESCUCHADO DE..J ANTONIO GLEZ FDEZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 80 13.3 20.7 20.7 NO MENCION 2 305 50.9 79.3 100.0 0 215 35.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 385 Missing cases 215 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST P3_5 HA ESCUCHADO DE..CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 264 44.0 68.5 68.5 NO MENCION 2 121 20.2 31.5 100.0 0 215 35.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 385 Missing cases 215 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P3_6 HA ESCUCHADO DE..MANUEL JIMENEZ GUZMAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 58 9.6 15.0 15.0 NO MENCION 2 328 54.6 85.0 100.0 0 215 35.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 385 Missing cases 215 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P3_7 HA ESCUCHADO DE..CARLOS CASTILLO PERAZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 143 23.9 37.2 37.2 NO MENCION 2 242 40.3 62.8 100.0 0 215 35.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 385 Missing cases 215 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST P3_8 HA ESCUCHADO DE..CECILIA SOTO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 33 5.5 8.5 8.5 NO MENCION 2 352 58.7 91.5 100.0 0 215 35.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 385 Missing cases 215 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P3_9 HA ESCUCHADO DE..PEDRO FERRIZ SANTA CRUZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 23 3.9 6.0 6.0 NO MENCION 2 362 60.3 94.0 100.0 0 215 35.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 385 Missing cases 215 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P3_10 HA ESCUCHADO DE..JORGE GLEZ TORRES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 23 3.8 5.9 5.9 NO MENCION 2 363 60.4 94.1 100.0 0 215 35.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 385 Missing cases 215 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST P3_11 HA ESCUCHADO DE..OTRO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 11 1 .2 2.6 2.6 MADRAZO 13 3 .5 7.0 9.5 D FERNANDEZ DE CEVAL 16 5 .9 12.4 21.9 CAMACHO SOLIS 18 1 .1 1.6 23.5 IRMA SERRANO 22 1 .2 2.7 26.2 CAMPA CIPRIAN 25 2 .4 5.4 31.5 28 2 .3 3.6 35.1 29 1 .1 1.5 36.6 30 1 .1 1.8 38.5 97 1 .1 1.9 40.3 98 2 .3 3.6 43.9 99 25 4.2 56.1 100.0 0 556 92.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 44 Missing cases 556 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4_1 CANDIDATO PAN A GOBNO DF CARLOS C PERAZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 155 25.8 25.8 25.8 NO MENCION 2 445 74.2 74.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4_2 CANDIDATO PAN A GOBNO DF FCO JOSE PAOLI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 55 9.2 9.2 9.2 NO MENCION 2 545 90.8 90.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST P4_3 CANDIDATO PAN A GOBNO DF OTRO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 11 1.8 1.8 1.8 NO MENCION 2 589 98.2 98.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 COMO VA HACER PAN PARA OBTENER CANDIDATO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DELEGADOS VOTAN x CA 1 221 36.8 36.8 36.8 OTRO 2 53 8.9 8.9 45.7 NS 3 312 52.0 52.0 97.7 NC 4 14 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA11 HABIA OIDO DE ...CARLOS C PERAZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 394 65.6 65.6 65.6 NO 2 203 33.8 33.8 99.4 NC 3 4 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST CONRCA12 HABIA OIDO DE ...FCO JOSE PAOLI BOLIO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 166 27.7 27.7 27.7 NO 2 432 71.9 71.9 99.6 NC 3 2 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI11 QUE OPINION TIENE DE CARLOS C PERAZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 111 18.5 28.3 28.3 REGULAR 2 136 22.7 34.6 62.8 MALA 3 42 7.0 10.6 73.4 NS/NC 4 105 17.4 26.6 100.0 0 206 34.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 394 Missing cases 206 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI12 QUE OPINION TIENE DE FCO JOSE PAOLI BOLI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 45 7.5 27.0 27.0 REGULAR 2 55 9.1 32.9 59.9 MALA 3 21 3.5 12.7 72.7 NS/NC 4 45 7.6 27.3 100.0 0 434 72.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 166 Missing cases 434 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST P7 DEL PAN QUIEN PREFIERE COMO CANDIDATO DF Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CARLOS CASTILLO PERA 1 260 43.3 43.3 43.3 FCO J PAOLI BOLIO 2 48 8.1 8.1 51.4 NO CONOCE SUFICIENTE 3 78 13.1 13.1 64.4 NINGUNO 4 109 18.2 18.2 82.7 NS 5 88 14.7 14.7 97.4 NC 6 16 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8_1 CANDIDATO PRI GOBNO DF MANUEL JIMENEZ G Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 71 11.9 11.9 11.9 NO MENCION 2 529 88.1 88.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8_2 CANDIDATO PRI GOBNO DF ALFREDO DEL MAZO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 247 41.1 41.1 41.1 NO MENCION 2 353 58.9 58.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST P8_3 CANDIDATO PRI GOBNO DF J ANTONIO FDEZ GL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 90 15.0 15.0 15.0 NO MENCION 2 510 85.0 85.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8_4 CANDIDATO PRI GOBNO DF OTRO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 11 1.9 1.9 1.9 NO MENCION 2 589 98.1 98.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PNIIDEA XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO CAPTURADA 0 600 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 600 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST P9 COMO VA HACER PRI PARA OBTENER CANDIDATO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DELEGADOS VOTAN x AL 1 248 41.3 41.3 41.3 OTROS 10 2 .4 .4 41.7 CAMPAÑAS 11 9 1.5 1.5 43.2 DEDAZO 12 28 4.6 4.6 47.8 POR DEBATE 13 9 1.6 1.6 49.3 VOTACION DE POBLACIO 14 5 .9 .9 50.2 YA ESTA DECIDIDO 15 13 2.1 2.1 52.3 COMPRANDO VOTOS 16 7 1.1 1.1 53.5 VALOR CURRICULAR 17 2 .4 .4 53.9 20 2 .3 .3 54.2 29 1 .1 .1 54.3 INSUFICIENTE 97 3 .6 .6 54.8 NC 98 13 2.1 2.1 56.9 NS 99 258 43.1 43.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA21 HABIA OIDO DE ...MANUEL JIMENEZ GUZMAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 169 28.1 28.1 28.1 NO 2 430 71.7 71.7 99.9 NC 3 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST CONRCA22 HABIA OIDO DE ...ALFREDO DEL MAZO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 468 78.0 78.0 78.0 NO 2 132 22.0 22.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA23 HABIA OIDO DE ...J ANTONIO FDEZ GLEZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 213 35.6 35.6 35.6 NO 2 383 63.8 63.8 99.4 NC 3 4 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI21 QUE OPINION TIENE DE MANUEL JIMENEZ GUZM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 38 6.3 22.5 22.5 REGULAR 2 71 11.8 41.9 64.4 MALA 3 29 4.9 17.4 81.8 NS/NC 4 31 5.1 18.2 100.0 0 431 71.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 431 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST CANOPI22 QUE OPINION TIENE DE ALFREDO DEL MAZO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 133 22.1 28.3 28.3 REGULAR 2 180 30.1 38.5 66.9 MALA 3 83 13.8 17.7 84.6 NS/NC 4 72 12.0 15.4 100.0 0 132 22.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 468 Missing cases 132 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI23 QUE OPINION TIENE DE J ANTONIO FDEZ GLEZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 40 6.7 18.7 18.7 REGULAR 2 91 15.2 42.8 61.6 MALA 3 40 6.7 18.9 80.5 NS/NC 4 42 6.9 19.5 100.0 0 387 64.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 213 Missing cases 387 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P11 DEL PRI A QUIEN PREFERIRIA USTED... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MANUEL JIMENEZ G 1 29 4.9 4.9 4.9 ALFREDO DEL MAZO 2 267 44.4 44.4 49.3 J ANTONIO GLEZ FDEZ 3 47 7.8 7.8 57.1 NO CONOCE LO SUFIECE 4 52 8.7 8.7 65.9 NINGUNO 5 139 23.1 23.1 88.9 NS 6 57 9.5 9.5 98.5 NC 7 9 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST EXPCAM QUE ES MAS IMPORTANTE EN PROXIMO GOB DF Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXPERIENCIA GOBERNAR 1 247 41.1 41.1 41.1 OPCION DE CAMBIO 2 315 52.5 52.5 93.6 NINGUNA 3 20 3.3 3.3 96.9 NS 4 12 2.0 2.0 98.9 NC 5 7 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P13_1 CANDIDATO PRD GOBNO DF PORFIRIO MUÑOZ L Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 233 38.8 38.8 38.8 NO MENCION 2 367 61.2 61.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P13_2 CANDIDATO PRD GOBNO DF CUAUHTEMOC CARDEN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 315 52.6 52.6 52.6 NO MENCION 2 285 47.4 47.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST P13_3 CANDIDATO PRD GOBNO DF OTRO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 9 1.5 1.5 1.5 NO MENCION 2 591 98.5 98.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P14 COMO VA HACER EL PRD PARA OBTENER CANDID Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DELEGADOS VOTAN x CA 1 256 42.7 42.7 42.7 OTRO 2 61 10.2 10.2 52.9 NS 3 271 45.2 45.2 98.1 NC 4 11 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA31 HABIA OIDO DE ...PORFIRIO MUÑOZ L Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 475 79.2 79.2 79.2 NO 2 124 20.6 20.6 99.8 NC 3 1 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST CONRCA32 HABIA OIDO DE ...CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 558 93.0 93.0 93.0 NO 2 37 6.2 6.2 99.2 NC 3 5 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI31 QUE OPINION TIENE DE PORFIRIO MUÑOZ L Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 129 21.5 27.2 27.2 REGULAR 2 202 33.7 42.5 69.7 MALA 3 95 15.8 20.0 89.7 NS/NC 4 49 8.2 10.3 100.0 0 125 20.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 475 Missing cases 125 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI32 QUE OPINION TIENE DE CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 166 27.7 29.7 29.7 REGULAR 2 195 32.5 34.9 64.6 MALA 3 153 25.6 27.5 92.1 NS/NC 4 44 7.3 7.9 100.0 0 42 7.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 558 Missing cases 42 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST P16 DEL PRD A QUIEN PREFERIRIA USTED...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PORFIRIO MUÑOZ LEDO 1 213 35.5 35.5 35.5 CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 2 240 40.1 40.1 75.6 NO CONOCE SUFICIENTE 3 16 2.7 2.7 78.3 NINGUNO 4 96 16.0 16.0 94.3 NS 5 29 4.8 4.8 99.1 NC 6 5 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IDPAR NORMALMENTE USTED SE CONSIDERA...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PANISTA 1 97 16.1 16.1 16.1 PRIISTA 2 131 21.9 21.9 38.0 PERREDISTA 3 90 15.1 15.1 53.1 DE OTRO PARTIDO 4 28 4.6 4.6 57.7 CON NINGUN IDENTIFIC 5 241 40.1 40.1 97.8 NC 6 13 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P18 A QUIEN SE ELIGIRA COMO CANDIDATO DEL PA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CASTILLO PERAZA 1 383 63.8 63.8 63.8 PAOLI BOLIO 2 59 9.9 9.9 73.7 NS 3 147 24.6 24.6 98.3 NC 4 10 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST P19 A QUIEN SE ELIGIRA COMO CANDIDATO DEL PR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MANUEL JIMENEZ G 1 32 5.3 5.3 5.3 ALFREDO MAZO 2 394 65.7 65.7 71.0 J ANTNIO GLEZ FDEZ 3 45 7.5 7.5 78.5 NS 4 117 19.4 19.4 97.9 NC 5 12 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P20 A QUIEN SE ELIGIRA COMO CANDIDATO DEL PR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PORFIRIO MUÑOZ L 1 239 39.8 39.8 39.8 CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 2 277 46.2 46.2 85.9 NS 3 75 12.5 12.5 98.5 NC 4 9 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRIHEAD SI LOS UNICOS CANDIDATOS FUERAN....X CUA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CASTILLO PERAZA (PAN 1 144 24.0 24.0 24.0 CCS DEL (PDR) 2 179 29.8 29.8 53.8 DEL MAZO (PRI) 3 175 29.2 29.2 83.0 NINGUNO 4 62 10.4 10.4 93.5 NS 5 29 4.9 4.9 98.3 NC 6 10 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST SITEDO SITUACION ACTUAL DEL DISTRITO FEDERAL... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 84 14.0 14.0 14.0 IGUAL DE BIEN 2 20 3.3 3.3 17.3 IGUAL DE MAL 3 116 19.4 19.4 36.7 PEOR 4 372 61.9 61.9 98.7 NS 5 7 1.2 1.2 99.9 NC 6 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRIHEAD2 SI LOS UNICOS CANDIDATOS FUERAN....X CUA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CASTILLO PERAZA (PAN 1 165 27.5 27.5 27.5 CCS DEL (PRD) 2 181 30.2 30.2 57.7 J ANTONIO GLEZ FDEZ 3 137 22.9 22.9 80.6 NINGUNO 4 83 13.9 13.9 94.5 NS 5 26 4.3 4.3 98.8 NC 6 7 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P24 QUE SE ACERCA MAS A LO QUE USTED PIENSA? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SIEMPRE VOTA x MISMO 1 313 52.2 52.2 52.2 A VECES x UNO u OTRO 2 216 36.0 36.0 88.2 NINGUNA DE LAS DOS 3 60 10.0 10.0 98.2 NS 4 5 .8 .8 99.0 NC 5 6 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST TRIHEAD3 SI LOS UNICOS CANDIDATOS FUERAN....X CUA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CASTILLO PERAZA (PAN 1 175 29.2 29.2 29.2 CCS DEL (PRD) 2 185 30.9 30.9 60.1 MANUEL JIMENEZ G. (P 3 128 21.4 21.4 81.5 NINGUNO 4 74 12.3 12.3 93.8 NS 5 29 4.8 4.8 98.6 NC 6 8 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P26_1 DE LOS DEL PRI,QUIEN MAS...HONESTO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEL MAZO 1 154 25.7 25.7 25.7 J ANTONIO GLEZ F 2 35 5.9 5.9 31.6 MANUEL J GUZMAN 3 37 6.2 6.2 37.7 4 294 49.0 49.0 86.7 5 80 13.3 13.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P26_2 DE LOS DEL PRI,QUIEN MAS...MAS EXPERIENC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEL MAZO 1 303 50.6 50.6 50.6 J ANTONIO GLEZ F 2 14 2.4 2.4 52.9 MANUEL J GUZMAN 3 22 3.7 3.7 56.6 4 150 25.0 25.0 81.6 5 110 18.4 18.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST P26_3 DE LOS DEL PRI,QUIEN MAS...HABLAR SENCIL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEL MAZO 1 185 30.9 30.9 30.9 J ANTONIO GLEZ F 2 49 8.2 8.2 39.1 MANUEL J GUZMAN 3 45 7.5 7.5 46.6 4 167 27.8 27.8 74.4 5 153 25.6 25.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P26_4 DE LOS DEL PRI,QUIEN MAS...CONOCE PROBLE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEL MAZO 1 178 29.6 29.6 29.6 J ANTONIO GLEZ F 2 34 5.6 5.6 35.2 MANUEL J GUZMAN 3 29 4.9 4.9 40.1 4 220 36.7 36.7 76.8 5 139 23.2 23.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P26_5 DE LOS DEL PRI,QUIEN MAS...MAS PERSONALI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEL MAZO 1 235 39.1 39.1 39.1 J ANTONIO GLEZ F 2 33 5.6 5.6 44.7 MANUEL J GUZMAN 3 23 3.8 3.8 48.5 4 191 31.8 31.8 80.3 5 118 19.7 19.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST P27 ENTRE LOS DEL PRI, EN DEBATE QUIEN GANAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEL MAZO 1 321 53.5 53.5 53.5 J ANTONIO GLEZ FDEZ. 2 32 5.4 5.4 58.8 MANUEL JIMENEZ GUZMA 3 33 5.5 5.5 64.3 NINGUNO 4 52 8.6 8.6 73.0 NS 5 158 26.3 26.3 99.3 NC 6 4 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P28 ENTRE EL PRI, QUIEN TIENE + CARACT GOB D Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEL MAZO 1 296 49.3 49.3 49.3 J ANTONIO GLEZ FDEZ. 2 41 6.8 6.8 56.1 MANUEL JIMENEZ GUZMA 3 37 6.2 6.2 62.3 NINGUNO 4 118 19.7 19.7 82.0 NS 5 104 17.3 17.3 99.3 NC 6 4 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 278 46.4 46.4 46.4 femenino 2 322 53.6 53.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 32 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 172 28.7 28.7 28.7 26-40 2 226 37.7 37.7 66.3 41-60 3 141 23.5 23.5 89.8 61 + 4 61 10.2 10.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INST Institución en donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Ninguno 1 243 40.5 40.5 40.5 gob fed 2 74 12.4 12.4 52.9 paraestatal 3 6 .9 .9 53.8 emp priv 4 157 26.1 26.1 80.0 negocio prop 5 68 11.3 11.3 91.3 independiente 6 52 8.7 8.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OCUP A que se dedica usted...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Ama de casa 1 137 22.9 56.5 56.5 Estudiante 2 66 10.9 27.0 83.5 Jubilado 3 23 3.8 9.3 92.8 Desempleado 4 16 2.6 6.4 99.2 Otro 5 2 .3 .8 100.0 0 357 59.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 243 Missing cases 357 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 33 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST PUESTO Cual es su puesto o cargo en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario 1 24 4.0 6.7 6.7 Directivo 2 18 3.1 5.2 11.9 Contratista/Independ 3 71 11.9 20.0 31.9 Profesional Indep 4 13 2.1 3.5 35.4 Empleado/Obrero 5 215 35.8 60.2 95.6 Trabaja sin paga 6 15 2.5 4.1 99.7 Nc 98 1 .2 .3 100.0 0 243 40.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 357 Missing cases 243 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESCOL Escolaridad entrevistado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 17 2.8 2.8 2.8 prim inc 2 40 6.7 6.7 9.5 prim comp 3 72 12.0 12.0 21.5 sec incomp 4 27 4.6 4.6 26.1 sec completa 5 114 19.0 19.0 45.0 Prepa incompleta 6 68 11.4 11.4 56.4 Prepa completa 7 109 18.2 18.2 74.6 Universidad incomple 8 65 10.8 10.8 85.4 Universidad Completa 9 88 14.6 14.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 34 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST INGRE Rango ingreso familiar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 67 11.2 11.2 11.2 1-3 sm 2 215 35.8 35.8 47.0 3-5 sm 3 130 21.7 21.7 68.7 5-7 sm 4 66 10.9 10.9 79.6 7-10 5 39 6.5 6.5 86.1 10-30 SM 6 35 5.9 5.9 92.0 30 + SM 7 13 2.2 2.2 94.2 Ns/Nc 8 35 5.8 5.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TEL Tiene usted telefono en casa...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 403 67.2 67.2 67.2 NO 2 195 32.6 32.6 99.7 NC 3 2 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AUTO Cuantos autos hay en su hogar...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NINGUNO 1 310 51.7 51.7 51.7 UNO 2 191 31.8 31.8 83.5 DOS 3 76 12.7 12.7 96.2 TRES O MAS 4 23 3.8 3.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 35 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST PELE SI HOY ELEECCIO POR QUIEN VOTARIA...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 138 23.0 23.0 23.0 PRI 2 149 24.9 24.9 47.9 PPS 3 1 .1 .1 48.0 PRD 4 140 23.3 23.3 71.3 PC 5 2 .3 .3 71.6 PARM 6 2 .3 .3 71.9 PT 8 5 .8 .8 72.7 PVEM 9 14 2.4 2.4 75.1 OTRO 10 1 .1 .1 75.2 NINGUNO 11 59 9.8 9.8 85.0 NS 12 67 11.2 11.2 96.3 NC-BLANCO 13 17 2.8 2.8 99.0 ANULADO 14 6 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 600 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 36 DISTRITO FEDERAL (ESTATAL) 16/FEB/97 CAMPO 2/17/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS (DDF50297) FRECPOND.LST This procedure was completed at 14:21:25 End of Include file.