The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 2000 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 5587 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 698 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MUN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MORELIA 53 300 15.0 15.0 15.0 URUAPAN 102 131 6.6 6.6 21.6 ZAMORA 108 83 4.2 4.2 25.7 RESTO 999 1485 74.3 74.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE P1 PERSONAS QUE VIVEN AHI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 107 5.4 5.4 5.4 2 827 41.3 41.3 46.7 3 392 19.6 19.6 66.3 4 273 13.6 13.6 80.0 5 184 9.2 9.2 89.2 6 89 4.5 4.5 93.6 7 39 1.9 1.9 95.6 8 31 1.6 1.6 97.1 9 16 .8 .8 97.9 10 18 .9 .9 98.8 11 5 .2 .2 99.0 12 3 .1 .1 99.2 15 2 .1 .1 99.3 16 1 .1 .1 99.3 23 2 .1 .1 99.4 33 7 .4 .4 99.8 96 0 .0 .0 99.8 NC 98 5 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 SIT ECO DEL PAIS RESPExCTO AÑO PASADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 89 4.4 4.4 4.4 IGUAL 2 193 9.7 9.7 14.1 PEOR 3 1664 83.2 83.2 97.3 NS 4 46 2.3 2.3 99.6 NC 5 8 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE P3 COMO SERA SIT ECONOM PROXIMO AÑO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 297 14.8 14.8 14.8 IGUAL 2 445 22.2 22.2 37.1 PEOR 3 873 43.7 43.7 80.7 NS 4 382 19.1 19.1 99.8 NC 5 3 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P3_1 POR QUE..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTRO 10 9 .5 1.1 1.1 INFLACION 11 138 6.9 15.8 16.9 CRISIS ECONOMICA 12 201 10.0 23.0 39.9 DESEMPLEO 13 80 4.0 9.2 49.1 DEVALUACION 14 86 4.3 9.8 58.9 MAL GOBIERNO 15 111 5.6 12.7 71.6 SALARIOS BAJOS 16 33 1.6 3.8 75.4 APOYO AL CAMPO 17 7 .3 .8 76.2 DEUDA EXTERNA 18 1 .0 .1 76.3 PARTIDOS POLITICOS 19 17 .9 2.0 78.3 TLC 20 1 .0 .1 78.4 SEGURIDAD PUBLICA 21 2 .1 .2 78.6 43 2 .1 .2 78.8 96 17 .8 1.9 80.8 INSUFICIENTE ESPEC 97 23 1.1 2.6 83.4 NC 98 74 3.7 8.5 91.9 NS 99 71 3.5 8.1 100.0 0 1127 56.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 873 Missing cases 1127 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE P4_1 SEMANAL : LEE SECC POL PERIODICOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 128 6.4 6.4 6.4 2 125 6.3 6.3 12.7 3 67 3.3 3.3 16.0 4 17 .8 .8 16.9 5 7 .3 .3 17.2 6 3 .2 .2 17.4 7 118 5.9 5.9 23.2 8 0 .0 .0 23.3 10 0 .0 .0 23.3 12 2 .1 .1 23.4 19 2 .1 .1 23.4 NUNCA 96 1495 74.7 74.7 98.2 NC 98 24 1.2 1.2 99.4 NS 99 13 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4_2 SEMANAL : VE POR TV NOTICIAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 77 3.9 3.9 3.9 2 180 9.0 9.0 12.9 3 239 12.0 12.0 24.8 4 75 3.7 3.7 28.6 5 130 6.5 6.5 35.1 6 79 4.0 4.0 39.0 7 905 45.3 45.3 84.3 8 4 .2 .2 84.5 10 1 .1 .1 84.6 13 1 .0 .0 84.6 20 0 .0 .0 84.6 35 0 .0 .0 84.6 60 2 .1 .1 84.7 NUNCA 96 305 15.2 15.2 99.9 INSUFICIENTE ESPEC 97 1 .0 .0 100.0 NS 99 1 .0 .0 100.0 0 0 .0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE P4_3 SEMANAL : ESCUCHA NOTICIAS RADIO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 75 3.8 3.8 3.8 2 112 5.6 5.6 9.4 3 125 6.3 6.3 15.6 4 48 2.4 2.4 18.0 5 51 2.5 2.5 20.6 6 26 1.3 1.3 21.9 7 455 22.8 22.8 44.7 10 1 .1 .1 44.7 11 1 .0 .0 44.8 12 2 .1 .1 44.9 14 1 .1 .1 44.9 15 1 .1 .1 45.0 33 2 .1 .1 45.1 39 2 .1 .1 45.2 70 0 .0 .0 45.2 79 0 .0 .0 45.2 NUNCA 96 1091 54.5 54.5 99.7 INSUFICIENTE ESPEC 97 1 .0 .0 99.8 NC 98 3 .1 .1 99.9 NS 99 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE P5_1 CANAL TV SE ENTERA DE NOT POL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTRO 10 4 .2 .2 .2 EL 13 NAL 11 364 18.2 18.2 18.4 2 NAL 12 1041 52.1 52.1 70.5 7 13 50 2.5 2.5 72.9 10 LOCAL 14 30 1.5 1.5 74.5 5 15 38 1.9 1.9 76.4 21 LOCAL 16 1 .1 .1 76.4 18 17 8 .4 .4 76.8 17 18 1 .1 .1 76.9 TELEMUNDO 19 39 1.9 1.9 78.8 8 20 16 .8 .8 79.6 TELENOTICIAS 21 1 .0 .0 79.7 9 22 34 1.7 1.7 81.4 4 LOCAL 23 5 .3 .3 81.6 12 LOCAL 24 6 .3 .3 81.9 11 25 3 .2 .2 82.1 19 26 1 .1 .1 82.2 24 27 4 .2 .2 82.4 13 SIST MICH 28 6 .3 .3 82.7 2 MORELIA 29 1 .0 .0 82.7 HBO 30 1 .0 .0 82.7 14 LOCAL 31 1 .0 .0 82.8 NBC 32 0 .0 .0 82.8 6 33 9 .4 .4 83.2 28 34 0 .0 .0 83.2 20 35 0 .0 .0 83.3 6 CABLE 36 0 .0 .0 83.3 68 CABLE 37 0 .0 .0 83.3 21 CABLE 38 0 .0 .0 83.3 6 UNIVISION 40 2 .1 .1 83.4 40 CABLE 41 0 .0 .0 83.4 7 LOCAL 42 1 .0 .0 83.5 61 2 .1 .1 83.5 62 0 .0 .0 83.5 NO VE TELEV 96 285 14.3 14.3 97.8 INSUFICIENTE ESPEC 97 8 .4 .4 98.2 NC 98 4 .2 .2 98.5 NS 99 31 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE P5_2 EST RADIO ESCUCHA NOT POL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTRO 10 2 .1 .1 .1 ACIR 11 29 1.5 1.5 1.6 RADIO RANCHITO 12 69 3.5 3.5 5.0 93.6 13 3 .2 .2 5.2 TIGRESA 14 2 .1 .1 5.3 97.1 15 1 .0 .0 5.4 96 16 2 .1 .1 5.5 XLQ 17 5 .3 .3 5.7 SIFOROFONIA 18 1 .0 .0 5.8 RONOLITO 19 2 .1 .1 5.9 ESTACION 20 8 .4 .4 6.3 91.5 21 2 .1 .1 6.4 306 22 2 .1 .1 6.5 1400 23 1 .0 .0 6.5 XEI 24 20 1.0 1.0 7.5 RADIO AMISTAD 25 2 .1 .1 7.6 LA TREMENDA 26 10 .5 .5 8.1 LA MODERNA 27 12 .6 .6 8.7 RADIO MIL 28 1 .1 .1 8.8 LA G 29 1 .0 .0 8.8 960 30 1 .0 .0 8.8 RADIO MICH 31 2 .1 .1 8.9 NOTA ROJA 32 3 .1 .1 9.1 PANORAMA 34 1 .0 .0 9.1 VARIEDADES 35 53 2.7 2.7 11.8 RADIO LASER 36 28 1.4 1.4 13.1 KW 37 1 .0 .0 13.2 RADIO FIESTA 38 1 .0 .0 13.2 RADIO UNIVERSAL 39 1 .0 .0 13.2 LA TAPATIA 41 88 4.4 4.4 17.6 ESTACION ZAMORA 42 12 .6 .6 18.2 VIDA 43 2 .1 .1 18.3 XEUV 44 2 .1 .1 18.4 XEQL 45 60 3.0 3.0 21.5 RADIO RAZA 46 2 .1 .1 21.6 QT 47 5 .3 .3 21.8 58 48 4 .2 .2 22.0 ESTEREO VIDA JALISCO 49 11 .6 .6 22.6 XEX 50 3 .2 .2 22.7 GUADALAJARA 51 0 .0 .0 22.8 92.1-92.3 52 3 .1 .1 22.9 LC 53 6 .3 .3 23.2 LA PIEDAD 54 0 .0 .0 23.2 RADIO GALLITO 55 6 .3 .3 23.5 CATEDRAL 56 2 .1 .1 23.6 LA BUENISIMA 57 1 .0 .0 23.6 XEW 58 21 1.1 1.1 24.7 LA CONSENTIDA 59 0 .0 .0 24.7 SAHUAYO 60 13 .6 .6 25.3 10.3 61 0 .0 .0 25.4 PUELY ZAMORA 62 4 .2 .2 25.5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE P5_2 EST RADIO ESCUCHA NOT POL RADIO ALEGRIA 63 0 .0 .0 25.6 RADIO RED 64 6 .3 .3 25.9 FM 102 65 7 .4 .4 26.2 PODEROSA 66 56 2.8 2.8 29.0 MEXICANA URUAPAN 67 39 2.0 2.0 31.0 FESTIBAL 68 6 .3 .3 31.3 HORIZONTE 70 21 1.0 1.0 32.3 71 5 .2 .2 32.6 XENT 72 4 .2 .2 32.8 73 4 .2 .2 33.0 RANCHERITA 74 12 .6 .6 33.6 MODERNA LOCA 75 3 .1 .1 33.7 XEXF 76 0 .0 .0 33.7 XETN 77 1 .0 .0 33.8 RADIO PIEDAD 78 25 1.3 1.3 35.0 RADIO FORMULA 79 2 .1 .1 35.1 92.5 GLOBO 80 5 .3 .3 35.4 RADIO CAÑON 81 3 .2 .2 35.5 XEUQ 83 5 .2 .2 35.8 SLP 84 1 .0 .0 35.8 WF CADENA 85 2 .1 .1 35.9 LEON 86 3 .1 .1 36.1 AZUL LOCAL 87 4 .2 .2 36.3 INFORMAL GUADALAJARA 88 4 .2 .2 36.5 LP 89 41 2.1 2.1 38.5 LG DE LEON 90 8 .4 .4 38.9 KN TERAN 91 10 .5 .5 39.4 FAMILIAR IRAPUATO 92 3 .2 .2 39.6 TRIPLE A 93 2 .1 .1 39.7 RADIO IMPACTO 94 4 .2 .2 39.9 99.9 95 6 .3 .3 40.1 NO ESCUCHA RADIO 96 1060 53.0 53.0 93.1 INSUFICIENTE ESPEC 97 19 1.0 1.0 94.1 NC 98 15 .7 .7 94.8 NS 99 103 5.2 5.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE P5_3 PERIODICO ENTERA DE NOT POL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTRO 10 4 .2 .2 .2 LA VOZ 11 224 11.2 11.2 11.4 LA LUZ 12 3 .1 .1 11.5 UNO MAS UNO 13 2 .1 .1 11.6 REFORMA 14 2 .1 .1 11.7 BUENDIA 15 1 .0 .0 11.7 EL SOL 16 29 1.5 1.5 13.2 EXCELSIOR 17 20 1.0 1.0 14.2 DIARIO 18 14 .7 .7 14.9 NOVEDADES 19 5 .2 .2 15.1 OVACIONES 20 2 .1 .1 15.2 LA EXTRA 21 3 .2 .2 15.4 EL FINANCIERO 22 2 .1 .1 15.5 EL UNIVERSAL 23 4 .2 .2 15.7 LA JORNADA 24 24 1.2 1.2 16.9 EL HERALDO DE MICH 25 5 .3 .3 17.1 LA GUIA 26 6 .3 .3 17.4 EL DOS ZAMORA 27 2 .1 .1 17.5 EL ECONOMISTA 28 0 .0 .0 17.5 MENSAJE 29 5 .3 .3 17.8 ACCION 30 0 .0 .0 17.8 LA OPINION 31 34 1.7 1.7 19.5 EL SOL IRAPUATO 32 2 .1 .1 19.6 PERIODICO DE CELAYA 33 8 .4 .4 20.0 PAPIRO 34 2 .1 .1 20.1 AM DE LEON 35 23 1.1 1.1 21.3 EL SOL IRAPUATO 36 3 .1 .1 21.4 EL DIA ZAMORA 37 2 .1 .1 21.5 EL SEMANAL 38 2 .1 .1 21.6 CAMBIO 39 2 .1 .1 21.7 PESCADOR DE ACAMBARO 40 11 .5 .5 22.2 LA TRIBUNA 41 2 .1 .1 22.3 EL INFORMADOR 42 2 .1 .1 22.4 EL ESTO 43 2 .1 .1 22.5 LA CRITICA 44 4 .2 .2 22.7 RESUMEN 45 2 .1 .1 22.8 MEXIA 46 3 .1 .1 22.9 59 0 .0 .0 22.9 66 2 .1 .1 23.1 69 2 .1 .1 23.2 90 3 .1 .1 23.3 95 0 .0 .0 23.3 NO LEE PERIODICO 96 1461 73.1 73.1 96.4 INSUFICIENTE ESPEC 97 14 .7 .7 97.1 NC 98 18 .9 .9 98.0 NS 99 40 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE P6 COMO ES SIT PERS COMPARANDO AÑO PASADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 230 11.5 11.5 11.5 IGUAL 2 545 27.3 27.3 38.8 PEOR 3 1192 59.6 59.6 98.4 NS 4 30 1.5 1.5 99.9 NC 5 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7 SIT AÑO PROXIMO...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 491 24.6 24.6 24.6 IGUAL 2 552 27.6 27.6 52.2 PEOR 3 663 33.1 33.1 85.3 NS 4 292 14.6 14.6 99.9 NC 5 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE P7_1 PORQUE SERA PEOR...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEVALUACION 1 197 9.9 29.7 29.7 CRISIS ECONOMICA 2 243 12.2 36.7 66.5 BAJOS SALARIOS 3 94 4.7 14.3 80.7 MAL GOBIERNO 4 53 2.7 8.1 88.8 OTRO 10 3 .1 .4 89.2 DESEMPLEO 11 15 .7 2.3 91.4 MALOS CANDIDATOS 12 2 .1 .3 91.7 13 4 .2 .6 92.4 14 1 .1 .2 92.5 22 0 .0 .1 92.6 INSUFICIENTE ESPEC 97 10 .5 1.6 94.2 NC 98 24 1.2 3.7 97.8 NS 99 14 .7 2.2 100.0 0 1337 66.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 663 Missing cases 1337 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8 PALABRA PARA DESCRIBIR SIT POLITICA PAIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PELIGROSA 1 383 19.1 19.1 19.1 PREOCUPANTE 2 1022 51.1 51.1 70.2 TRANQUILA 3 403 20.1 20.1 90.4 MEJOR Q ANTES 4 55 2.7 2.7 93.1 NS 5 130 6.5 6.5 99.6 NC 6 7 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE P9_1 GOBR ANTERIOR..APOYO A COMERCIO E INDUST Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 254 12.7 12.7 12.7 SIGUE IGUAL 2 398 19.9 19.9 32.6 EMPEORO 3 744 37.2 37.2 69.8 NS 4 575 28.7 28.7 98.5 NC 5 29 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9_2 GOBR ANTERIOR..SEGURIDAD PUBLICA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 348 17.4 17.4 17.4 SIGUE IGUAL 2 497 24.8 24.8 42.2 EMPEORO 3 860 43.0 43.0 85.2 NS 4 277 13.9 13.9 99.1 NC 5 18 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9_3 GOBR ANTERIOR..EDUCACION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 565 28.3 28.3 28.3 SIGUE IGUAL 2 671 33.6 33.6 61.8 EMPEORO 3 530 26.5 26.5 88.4 NS 4 218 10.9 10.9 99.2 NC 5 15 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE P9_4 GOBR ANTERIOR..SERVICIOS PUBLICOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 527 26.4 26.4 26.4 SIGUE IGUAL 2 572 28.6 28.6 55.0 EMPEORO 3 683 34.1 34.1 89.1 NS 4 201 10.0 10.0 99.1 NC 5 17 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9_5 GOBR ANTERIOR..EL EMPLEO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 122 6.1 6.1 6.1 SIGUE IGUAL 2 281 14.0 14.0 20.1 EMPEORO 3 1388 69.4 69.4 89.5 NS 4 198 9.9 9.9 99.5 NC 5 11 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9_6 GOBR ANTERIOR..APOYO AL CAMPO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 247 12.4 15.8 15.8 SIGUE IGUAL 2 267 13.4 17.1 32.8 EMPEORO 3 637 31.9 40.6 73.4 NS 4 394 19.7 25.1 98.6 NC 5 22 1.1 1.4 100.0 0 431 21.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1569 Missing cases 431 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE P10 CUANTO IMPORTA QUIEN SERA PROXIMO GOBERN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHISIMO 1 75 3.8 3.8 3.8 MUCHO 2 939 47.0 47.0 50.7 REGULAR 3 220 11.0 11.0 61.7 POCO 4 303 15.1 15.1 76.9 MUY POCO 5 61 3.1 3.1 79.9 NADA 6 348 17.4 17.4 97.3 NC 7 54 2.7 2.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P11 QUE ES MAS IMPORTANTE PARA DECIDIR VOTO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CANDIDATO 1 956 47.8 47.8 47.8 PARTIDO 2 802 40.1 40.1 87.9 NS 3 192 9.6 9.6 97.5 NC 4 49 2.5 2.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P12 QUE AFIRMACION SE ACERCA A LO Q UD PIENS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SIEMPRExMISMO 1 1044 52.2 52.2 52.2 A VECES POR UNO 2 737 36.9 36.9 89.1 CON NINGUNA 3 109 5.4 5.4 94.5 NS 4 77 3.8 3.8 98.3 NC 5 33 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE P13 QUIEN TIENE CULPA DE SIT ECONOM ACTUAL.. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CULPA DEL GOBIERNO 1 1004 50.2 50.2 50.2 NO SOLO CULPA DE GOB 2 837 41.9 41.9 92.1 NS 3 151 7.5 7.5 99.6 NC 4 8 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P13_1 A CUAL GOBIERNO SE REFIERE... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ERNESTO ZEDILLO 1 428 21.4 42.6 42.6 AUSENCIO CHAVEZ 2 72 3.6 7.1 49.7 AMBOS 3 289 14.5 28.8 78.5 NC 4 216 10.8 21.5 100.0 0 996 49.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1004 Missing cases 996 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P14 LO HECHO POR GOBR MICHOACAN HA MEJORADO? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent HA MEJORADO 1 576 28.8 28.8 28.8 NO CAMBIO 2 629 31.4 31.4 60.2 HA EMPEORADO 3 617 30.9 30.9 91.1 NS 4 163 8.2 8.2 99.3 NC 5 15 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE P15 SABE QUIEN ES EL CANDIDATO DEL PAN A GOB Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 744 37.2 37.2 37.2 NO 2 1239 61.9 61.9 99.1 NC 3 18 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P15_1 QUIEN ES...FELIPE CALDERON HINOJOSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CORRECTO 1 495 24.8 66.6 66.6 INCORRECTO 2 162 8.1 21.7 88.3 NC 3 87 4.3 11.7 100.0 0 1256 62.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 744 Missing cases 1256 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P15_2 QUE OPINION TIENE DE EL..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 197 9.9 39.8 39.8 REGULAR 2 164 8.2 33.1 72.9 MALA 3 23 1.2 4.7 77.6 NS 4 106 5.3 21.4 99.0 NC 5 5 .2 1.0 100.0 0 1505 75.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 495 Missing cases 1505 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE P16 SABE QUIEN ES EL CANDIDATO DEL PRI A GOB Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 1069 53.4 53.4 53.4 NO 2 910 45.5 45.5 99.0 NC 3 21 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P16_1 QUIEN ES...VICTOR MANUEL TINOCO RUBI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CORRECTO 1 889 44.4 83.2 83.2 INCORRECTO 2 111 5.6 10.4 93.6 NC 3 69 3.4 6.4 100.0 0 931 46.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1069 Missing cases 931 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P16_2 QUE OPINION TIENE DE EL..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 325 16.3 36.6 36.6 REGULAR 2 288 14.4 32.4 69.0 MALA 3 84 4.2 9.4 78.4 NS 4 176 8.8 19.8 98.2 NC 5 16 .8 1.8 100.0 0 1111 55.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 889 Missing cases 1111 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE P17 SABE QUIEN ES EL CANDIDATO DEL PRD A GOB Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 833 41.7 41.7 41.7 NO 2 1145 57.2 57.2 98.9 NC 3 22 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P17_1 QUIEN ES...CRISTOBAL ARIAS SOLIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CORRECTO 1 699 35.0 83.9 83.9 INCORRECTO 2 86 4.3 10.3 94.2 NC 3 48 2.4 5.8 100.0 0 1167 58.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 833 Missing cases 1167 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P17_2 QUE OPINION TIENE DE EL..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 216 10.8 30.9 30.9 REGULAR 2 249 12.5 35.6 66.5 MALA 3 140 7.0 20.0 86.5 NS 4 87 4.4 12.5 99.0 NC 5 7 .3 1.0 100.0 0 1301 65.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 699 Missing cases 1301 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE PAA_1 ENTRE PAN, PRI PRD...ES MAS CLARO HABLAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 354 17.7 17.7 17.7 PRI 2 426 21.3 21.3 39.0 PRD 3 240 12.0 12.0 51.0 NINGUNO 4 213 10.6 10.6 61.6 NS/NC 5 768 38.4 38.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PAA_2_ ENTRE PAN, PRI PRD...MAS CERCANO PUEBLO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 237 11.9 11.9 11.9 PRI 2 550 27.5 27.5 39.3 PRD 3 303 15.2 15.2 54.5 NINGUNO 4 187 9.3 9.3 63.8 NS/NC 5 723 36.2 36.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_1 VOTOS A...PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1274 63.7 63.7 63.7 UNO 1 103 5.2 5.2 68.9 DOS 2 199 9.9 9.9 78.8 TRES 3 129 6.5 6.5 85.3 CUATRO 4 21 1.1 1.1 86.3 CINCO 5 274 13.7 13.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE PVOT_2 VOTOS A...PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1153 57.7 57.7 57.7 UNO 1 128 6.4 6.4 64.0 DOS 2 186 9.3 9.3 73.3 TRES 3 113 5.6 5.6 79.0 CUATRO 4 15 .8 .8 79.8 CINCO 5 405 20.2 20.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_3 VOTOS A...PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1393 69.6 69.6 69.6 UNO 1 172 8.6 8.6 78.3 DOS 2 97 4.8 4.8 83.1 TRES 3 54 2.7 2.7 85.8 CUATRO 4 13 .6 .6 86.4 CINCO 5 271 13.6 13.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE PVOT_4 VOTOS A...OTROS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1974 98.7 98.7 98.7 UNO 1 8 .4 .4 99.1 DOS 2 5 .3 .3 99.4 TRES 3 1 .1 .1 99.4 CUATRO 4 1 .0 .0 99.4 CINCO 5 11 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_5 VOTOS A...ABSTENCION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1801 90.1 90.1 90.1 DOS 2 8 .4 .4 90.4 TRES 3 3 .1 .1 90.6 CUATRO 4 2 .1 .1 90.7 CINCO 5 186 9.3 9.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_6 VOTOS A...N/S Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1697 84.9 84.9 84.9 UNO 1 2 .1 .1 84.9 DOS 2 2 .1 .1 85.1 CINCO 5 299 14.9 14.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE PVOT_7 VOTOS A...N/C Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 1948 97.4 97.4 97.4 UNO 1 2 .1 .1 97.5 CINCO 5 50 2.5 2.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P19 EN POLITICA QUE ES LO QUE USTED PREFIERE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAS VALE MALO... 1 643 32.2 32.2 32.2 EL QUE NO ARRIESGA 2 1138 56.9 56.9 89.1 NINGUNA ANTERIOR 3 101 5.0 5.0 94.1 NS 4 104 5.2 5.2 99.3 NC 5 14 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PAB_1 ENTRE PAN, PRI PRD...ESTA MAS PREPARADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 328 16.4 16.4 16.4 PRI 2 584 29.2 29.2 45.6 PRD 3 216 10.8 10.8 56.4 NINGUNO 4 148 7.4 7.4 63.9 NS/NC 5 723 36.1 36.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 32 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE PAB_2 ENTRE PAN, PRI PRD...ES MAS SINCERO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 321 16.1 16.1 16.1 PRI 2 408 20.4 20.4 36.5 PRD 3 259 13.0 13.0 49.4 NINGUNO 4 315 15.7 15.7 65.1 NS/NC 5 697 34.9 34.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P20 ACUERDO CON EL PDTE ZEDILLO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 626 31.3 31.3 31.3 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 353 17.6 17.6 48.9 DESACUERDO PARTE 3 110 5.5 5.5 54.4 DESACUERDO 4 750 37.5 37.5 91.9 NS 5 144 7.2 7.2 99.1 NC 6 17 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P21 QUE SE ACERCA MAS A LO QUE UD PIENSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AL GOB LE IMPORTA UD 1 489 24.4 24.4 24.4 AL GOB NO LE IMPORTA 2 1405 70.2 70.2 94.7 NINGUNA 3 26 1.3 1.3 96.0 NS 4 71 3.5 3.5 99.5 NC 5 10 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 33 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE P22 PARA PROX GOBERNADOR EXPER/OPCION CAMBIO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXPER PARA GOB 1 862 43.1 43.1 43.1 OPCION DE CAMBIO 2 974 48.7 48.7 91.8 NINGUNA 3 30 1.5 1.5 93.3 NS 4 120 6.0 6.0 99.3 NC 5 14 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23 POR QUE CANDIDATO VOTARIA USTED...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CAND DEL PAN 1 689 34.4 34.4 34.4 CAND DEL PRD 2 743 37.2 37.2 71.6 NINGUNO DE ELLOS 3 324 16.2 16.2 87.8 NS 4 192 9.6 9.6 97.4 NC 5 53 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P24 ACUERDO CON EL GOBERNADOR DEL ESTADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 654 32.7 32.7 32.7 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 327 16.3 16.3 49.0 DESACUERDO PARTE 3 100 5.0 5.0 54.0 DESACUERDO 4 664 33.2 33.2 87.3 NS 5 236 11.8 11.8 99.1 NC 6 19 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 34 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE P25 POR QUIEN VOTO EN LAS ELECC DE 1994 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 259 12.9 12.9 12.9 PRI 2 791 39.5 39.5 52.5 PRD 3 330 16.5 16.5 69.0 OTRO 4 59 2.9 2.9 71.9 NS 5 259 12.9 12.9 84.9 NC 6 302 15.1 15.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P26 USTED QUE SE CONSIDERA (INDEPEND SU VOTO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PRIISTA 1 622 31.1 31.1 31.1 PANISTA 2 241 12.1 12.1 43.2 PERREDISTA 3 332 16.6 16.6 59.8 CON NINGUNO 4 714 35.7 35.7 95.4 OTRO 5 15 .8 .8 96.2 NC 6 76 3.8 3.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 35 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE P26_1 QUE TANTO SE CONSIDERA...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHISIMO 1 157 7.8 13.1 13.1 MUCHO 2 541 27.1 45.3 58.4 ALGO 3 370 18.5 30.9 89.3 POCO 4 90 4.5 7.5 96.8 NS 5 10 .5 .9 97.7 NC 6 28 1.4 2.3 100.0 0 805 40.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1195 Missing cases 805 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P27 PROX ELECCIONES SERAN IMPARCIALES O NO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent IMPARCIALES 1 697 34.9 34.9 34.9 FAVORECE ALGUNO 2 834 41.7 41.7 76.5 NS 3 440 22.0 22.0 98.5 NC 4 30 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P27_1 A QUE PARTIDO BENEFICIARAN...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 33 1.6 3.9 3.9 PRI 2 667 33.4 80.1 84.0 PRD 3 47 2.4 5.7 89.7 NS 4 64 3.2 7.7 97.4 NC 5 22 1.1 2.6 100.0 0 1166 58.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 834 Missing cases 1166 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 36 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE P28 A UD QUE TANTO LE IMPORTA PROX PDTE MPAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHISIMO 1 21 1.0 4.0 4.0 MUCHO 2 251 12.6 48.8 52.8 REGULAR 3 55 2.7 10.7 63.5 POCO 4 89 4.5 17.4 80.9 MUY POCO 5 15 .8 2.9 83.8 NADA 6 73 3.7 14.2 98.0 NC 7 10 .5 2.0 100.0 0 1485 74.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 515 Missing cases 1485 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P29 QUE TAN PROBABLE ES QUE VOTE EL 12 NOV.. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent POCO PROBABLE 1 201 10.0 10.0 10.0 2 33 1.6 1.6 11.7 3 28 1.4 1.4 13.1 4 39 1.9 1.9 15.0 5 114 5.7 5.7 20.7 6 82 4.1 4.1 24.9 7 92 4.6 4.6 29.5 8 186 9.3 9.3 38.8 9 169 8.5 8.5 47.2 MUY PROBABLE 10 996 49.8 49.8 97.0 NC 98 23 1.2 1.2 98.2 NS 99 37 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 37 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE P30 SABE QUIEN ES CAND DEL PAN A PDTE MPAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 203 10.1 39.4 39.4 NO 2 308 15.4 59.8 99.2 NC 3 4 .2 .8 100.0 0 1485 74.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 515 Missing cases 1485 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P30_1 QUIEN...(NOMBRE CORRECTO)..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CORRECTO 1 162 8.1 80.1 80.1 INCORRECTO 2 28 1.4 13.6 93.6 NC 3 13 .6 6.4 100.0 0 1797 89.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 203 Missing cases 1797 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P30_2 QUE OPINION TIENE UD DE EL...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 85 4.2 52.2 52.2 REGULAR 2 41 2.1 25.4 77.6 MALA 3 5 .2 2.9 80.5 NS 4 27 1.3 16.6 97.1 NC 5 5 .2 2.9 100.0 0 1838 91.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 162 Missing cases 1838 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 38 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE P31 SABE QUIEN ES CAND DEL PRI A PDTE MPAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 217 10.8 42.2 42.2 NO 2 292 14.6 56.8 99.0 NC 3 5 .3 1.0 100.0 0 1485 74.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 515 Missing cases 1485 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P31_1 QUIEN...(NOMBRE CORRECTO)..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CORRECTO 1 169 8.4 77.8 77.8 INCORRECTO 2 36 1.8 16.6 94.4 NC 3 12 .6 5.6 100.0 0 1783 89.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 217 Missing cases 1783 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P31_2 QUE OPINION TIENE UD DE EL...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 77 3.9 45.8 45.8 REGULAR 2 36 1.8 21.1 66.8 MALA 3 14 .7 8.6 75.4 NS 4 36 1.8 21.3 96.8 NC 5 5 .3 3.2 100.0 0 1831 91.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 1831 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 39 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE P32 SABE QUIEN ES CAND DEL PRD A PDTE MPAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 109 5.5 21.2 21.2 NO 2 402 20.1 78.1 99.3 NC 3 3 .2 .7 100.0 0 1485 74.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 515 Missing cases 1485 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P32_1 QUIEN...(NOMBRE CORRECTO)..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CORRECTO 1 77 3.9 70.7 70.7 INCORRECTO 2 19 1.0 17.7 88.4 NC 3 13 .6 11.6 100.0 0 1891 94.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 109 Missing cases 1891 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P32_2 QUE OPINION TIENE UD DE EL...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 26 1.3 33.3 33.3 REGULAR 2 19 .9 24.1 57.5 MALA 3 12 .6 15.6 73.1 NS 4 17 .8 21.5 94.5 NC 5 4 .2 5.5 100.0 0 1923 96.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 77 Missing cases 1923 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 40 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 917 45.9 45.9 45.9 femenino 2 1083 54.1 54.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 576 28.8 28.8 28.8 26-40 2 676 33.8 33.8 62.6 41-60 3 486 24.3 24.3 86.9 61 o + 4 257 12.9 12.9 99.8 99 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INST Institución donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 1048 52.4 52.4 52.4 gob fed 2 114 5.7 5.7 58.1 paraestatal 3 27 1.4 1.4 59.5 emp priv 4 223 11.2 11.2 70.6 negocio prop 5 204 10.2 10.2 80.9 independiente 6 383 19.1 19.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 41 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 806 40.3 76.9 76.9 estudiante 2 78 3.9 7.5 84.4 jubilado 3 26 1.3 2.5 86.9 desemp 4 53 2.6 5.0 91.9 otro 5 84 4.2 8.1 100.0 0 952 47.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1048 Missing cases 952 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUESTO Que puesto ocupa en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario, Patron o 1 24 1.2 2.5 2.5 Directivo o Func de 2 25 1.3 2.7 5.1 Contratista o trabaj 3 471 23.6 49.5 54.7 Profesionista Indepe 4 33 1.7 3.5 58.2 Emplea, trabaj, Obre 5 377 18.8 39.6 97.8 trabajador sin pago 6 19 1.0 2.0 99.8 No sabe 99 2 .1 .2 100.0 0 1048 52.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 952 Missing cases 1048 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 42 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 267 13.3 13.3 13.3 prim inc 2 536 26.8 26.8 40.1 prim comp 3 386 19.3 19.3 59.4 sec incom 4 105 5.3 5.3 64.7 sec comp 5 258 12.9 12.9 77.6 prep incom 6 105 5.2 5.2 82.8 prep comp 7 184 9.2 9.2 92.0 univ incom 8 76 3.8 3.8 95.9 univ comp + 9 83 4.1 4.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 724 36.2 36.2 36.2 1-3 sm 2 902 45.1 45.1 81.3 3-5 sm 3 209 10.4 10.4 91.8 5-7 sm 4 73 3.7 3.7 95.4 7-10 5 56 2.8 2.8 98.2 10 + SM 6 35 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 43 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE DEPEN CUANTOS DEPENDEN DE INGRESO FAMILIAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 82 4.1 4.1 4.1 2 223 11.1 11.1 15.2 3 289 14.5 14.5 29.7 4 362 18.1 18.1 47.8 5 337 16.8 16.8 64.7 6 255 12.7 12.7 77.4 7 168 8.4 8.4 85.8 8 105 5.3 5.3 91.0 9 59 2.9 2.9 94.0 10 52 2.6 2.6 96.6 11 26 1.3 1.3 97.9 12 15 .8 .8 98.6 13 9 .5 .5 99.1 14 4 .2 .2 99.3 15 1 .1 .1 99.4 16 3 .1 .1 99.5 20 3 .2 .2 99.7 22 4 .2 .2 99.9 28 2 .1 .1 100.0 NC 98 1 .0 .0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TEL HAY TELEFONO EN SU HOGAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 546 27.3 27.3 27.3 NO 2 1452 72.6 72.6 99.9 NC 3 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 44 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE AUTO CUANTOS AUTOS HAY EN SU HOGAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NINGUNO 1 1416 70.8 70.8 70.8 UNO 2 489 24.4 24.4 95.3 DOS 3 71 3.6 3.6 98.8 TRES 4 16 .8 .8 99.6 CUATRO O MAS 5 7 .3 .3 100.0 NC 6 1 .0 .0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESCUELA QUIEN ESTUDIA VA A PUBLICA O PRIVADA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PUBLICAS 1 1205 60.3 60.3 60.3 PRIVADAS 2 96 4.8 4.8 65.1 AMBAS 3 54 2.7 2.7 67.8 NINGUNA ESTUDIA 4 640 32.0 32.0 99.8 NC 5 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RELIG TIENE USTED ALGUNA RELIGION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 1899 95.0 95.0 95.0 NO 2 89 4.5 4.5 99.4 NC 3 11 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 45 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE RELIG_1 CUAL ES SU RELIGION...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CATOLICA 1 1844 92.2 97.1 97.1 OTRO 10 4 .2 .2 97.3 CRISTIANA 11 13 .6 .7 98.0 EVANGELISTA 12 12 .6 .6 98.6 TESTIGO DE JEHOVA 13 6 .3 .3 98.9 CREYENTE 14 8 .4 .4 99.3 APOSTOLICA 15 2 .1 .1 99.4 BAUTISTA 16 1 .1 .1 99.5 MORMON 17 0 .0 .0 99.5 PROTESTANTE 18 0 .0 .0 99.5 PENTECOSTES 19 1 .0 .0 99.6 ADVENTISTA 20 1 .0 .0 99.6 30 2 .1 .1 99.7 96 2 .1 .1 99.8 NC 98 2 .1 .1 99.9 NS 99 1 .1 .1 100.0 0 101 5.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1899 Missing cases 101 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VIVEN_1 CUANTOS TIENEN DE 0 A 12 AÑOS.. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 434 21.7 21.7 21.7 2 392 19.6 19.6 41.3 3 216 10.8 10.8 52.1 4 112 5.6 5.6 57.7 5 31 1.5 1.5 59.3 6 24 1.2 1.2 60.5 7 9 .5 .5 60.9 8 2 .1 .1 61.0 9 2 .1 .1 61.1 10 4 .2 .2 61.3 NINGUNA 96 768 38.4 38.4 99.7 NC 98 5 .3 .3 100.0 NS 99 0 .0 .0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 46 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE VIVEN_2 CUANTOS TIENEN DE 12 A 18 AÑOS.. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 385 19.3 19.3 19.3 2 328 16.4 16.4 35.7 3 110 5.5 5.5 41.2 4 29 1.4 1.4 42.6 5 13 .7 .7 43.3 6 10 .5 .5 43.8 7 0 .0 .0 43.8 NINGUNA 96 1118 55.9 55.9 99.7 NC 98 5 .3 .3 100.0 NS 99 1 .0 .0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VIVEN_3 CUANTOS TIENEN DE 18 A 64 AÑOS.. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 126 6.3 6.3 6.3 2 870 43.5 43.5 49.8 3 386 19.3 19.3 69.1 4 239 11.9 11.9 81.1 5 132 6.6 6.6 87.7 6 58 2.9 2.9 90.6 7 22 1.1 1.1 91.7 8 21 1.0 1.0 92.7 9 8 .4 .4 93.1 10 8 .4 .4 93.5 11 3 .1 .1 93.7 12 4 .2 .2 93.8 16 1 .1 .1 93.9 NINGUNA 96 120 6.0 6.0 99.9 NC 98 1 .1 .1 100.0 NS 99 0 .0 .0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 47 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE VIVEN_4 CUANTOS TIENEN DE 64 O MAS.. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 160 8.0 8.0 8.0 2 145 7.2 7.2 15.2 3 14 .7 .7 16.0 4 3 .2 .2 16.1 6 3 .2 .2 16.3 NINGUNA 96 1657 82.9 82.9 99.1 NC 98 15 .8 .8 99.9 NS 99 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE_1 SI HOY ELECC DE GOBERN POR QUIEN VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 361 18.0 18.0 18.0 PRI 2 617 30.8 30.8 48.9 PPS 3 2 .1 .1 49.0 PRD 4 370 18.5 18.5 67.5 PFCRN 5 12 .6 .6 68.1 PT 8 12 .6 .6 68.7 OTRO 10 6 .3 .3 69.0 NINGUNO 11 192 9.6 9.6 78.6 NS 12 308 15.4 15.4 94.0 BLANCO 13 102 5.1 5.1 99.1 NULO 14 18 .9 .9 100.0 15 0 .0 .0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2000 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 48 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE PELE_2 SI HOY ELECC PDTE MPAL POR QUIEN VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 150 7.5 29.2 29.2 PRI 2 131 6.6 25.5 54.7 PRD 4 59 3.0 11.6 66.2 PFCRN 5 1 .1 .3 66.5 PT 8 6 .3 1.1 67.7 OTRO 10 1 .0 .1 67.8 NINGUNO 11 36 1.8 7.0 74.8 NS 12 89 4.4 17.2 92.0 BLANCO 13 27 1.4 5.3 97.3 NULO 14 14 .7 2.7 100.0 0 1485 74.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 515 Missing cases 1485 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 49 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE This procedure was completed at 0:58:29 The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 2000 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 5587 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 698 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE_1 SI HOY ELECC DE GOBERN POR QUIEN VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 361 18.0 26.1 26.1 PRI 2 617 30.8 44.7 70.8 PRD 4 370 18.5 26.8 97.6 OTRO 10 33 1.7 2.4 100.0 0 620 31.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1380 Missing cases 620 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE_2 SI HOY ELECC PDTE MPAL POR QUIEN VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 150 7.5 43.0 43.0 PRI 2 131 6.6 37.6 80.7 PRD 4 59 3.0 17.1 97.8 OTRO 10 8 .4 2.2 100.0 0 1651 82.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 349 Missing cases 1651 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 50 PRE-ELEC MICHOACAN (ESTATAL) OCT/95 CAMPO 10/31/95 FRECUENCIAS DE MICHOACAN PONDERADAS EN ESTATAL.FRE This procedure was completed at 0:58:36