The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 501 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 6253 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 781 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MUN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 9 500 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE P1 CUANTAS PERSONAS MAYORES DE 18 AŅOS VIVE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 18 3.6 3.6 3.6 2 186 37.3 37.3 40.9 3 132 26.4 26.4 67.2 4 89 17.7 17.7 85.0 5 40 7.9 7.9 92.9 6 21 4.1 4.1 97.0 7 4 .8 .8 97.8 8 7 1.4 1.4 99.2 9 3 .6 .6 99.8 34 1 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 SITUACION ECONOMICA DEL PAIS HACE UN AŅO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 11 2.3 2.3 2.3 IGUAL 2 43 8.6 8.6 10.8 PEOR 3 442 88.4 88.4 99.3 N/S 4 4 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE P3 SITUACION ECONOMICA DEL PAIS PROXIMO AŅO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 80 15.9 15.9 15.9 IGUAL 2 166 33.1 33.1 49.0 PEOR 3 212 42.4 42.4 91.4 N/S 4 42 8.4 8.4 99.8 N/C 5 1 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P3_1 PEOR, POR QUE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 7 2 .3 .8 .8 OTROS 10 4 .8 1.8 2.5 MALA ADMON 11 3 .7 1.6 4.2 DEVALUACION 12 39 7.8 18.4 22.6 INFLACION 13 28 5.7 13.4 36.0 MAL GOBIERNO 14 26 5.2 12.2 48.3 DESEMPLEO 15 23 4.6 10.8 59.1 CRISIS ECONOMICA 17 51 10.1 23.9 82.9 FALTA LIQUIDEZ 18 1 .3 .6 83.6 BAJOS SALARIOS 19 10 1.9 4.6 88.2 DEUDA 20 2 .4 1.0 89.1 TASAS DE INTERES ALT 24 1 .2 .5 89.6 POBREZA 26 1 .2 .4 90.0 50 1 .3 .6 90.6 INSUFICIENTEMENTE ES 97 3 .6 1.3 91.9 NO CONTESTO 98 16 3.1 7.4 99.3 NO SABE 99 1 .3 .7 100.0 0 288 57.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 212 Missing cases 288 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE M1_1 CUANTAS VECES LEE LA SECCION POLITICA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 50 10.1 10.1 10.1 2 57 11.3 11.3 21.4 3 52 10.3 10.3 31.7 4 11 2.3 2.3 34.0 5 3 .7 .7 34.7 6 8 1.6 1.6 36.3 7 117 23.3 23.3 59.6 9 1 .2 .2 59.8 14 1 .3 .3 60.1 19 1 .2 .2 60.2 30 1 .3 .3 60.5 NUNCA 96 195 39.0 39.0 99.5 NO CONTESTO 98 2 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - M1_2 CUANTAS VECES VE NOTICIAS EN TV Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 24 4.8 4.8 4.8 2 29 5.9 5.9 10.7 3 55 11.1 11.1 21.8 4 20 3.9 3.9 25.7 5 27 5.4 5.4 31.1 6 19 3.7 3.7 34.8 7 289 57.8 57.8 92.6 9 1 .2 .2 92.7 20 1 .3 .3 93.0 60 1 .2 .2 93.2 NUNCA 96 33 6.7 6.7 99.8 NO CONTESTO 98 1 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE M1_3 CUANTAS VECES ESCUCHA NOTICIAS EN RADIO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 19 3.8 3.8 3.8 2 35 6.9 6.9 10.7 3 34 6.8 6.8 17.5 4 10 2.0 2.0 19.5 5 4 .8 .8 20.3 6 7 1.4 1.4 21.6 7 111 22.1 22.2 43.8 29 1 .2 .2 44.0 31 1 .1 .1 44.1 32 1 .3 .3 44.4 NUNCA 96 277 55.3 55.4 99.8 NO CONTESTO 98 1 .2 .2 100.0 0 1 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 499 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE M2 POR QUE CANAL DE TV SE ENTERA DE POLITIC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 2 3 .6 .6 .6 3 1 .2 .2 .7 4 3 .5 .5 1.3 7 1 .2 .2 1.4 9 1 .1 .1 1.6 4 11 160 32.0 32.0 33.6 2 12 83 16.6 16.6 50.1 13 TV AZTECA 13 89 17.8 17.8 68.0 7 14 42 8.4 8.4 76.3 15 1 .2 .2 76.6 9 16 13 2.7 2.7 79.2 17 1 .2 .2 79.4 18 29 5.8 5.8 85.2 19 8 1.7 1.7 86.9 20 1 .2 .2 87.1 21 2 .5 .5 87.5 TELEMUNDO 22 1 .3 .3 87.8 23 3 .6 .6 88.4 24 6 1.2 1.2 89.6 25 2 .4 .4 90.0 26 2 .4 .4 90.4 27 1 .2 .2 90.6 29 2 .4 .4 91.0 61 1 .2 .2 91.2 71 1 .3 .3 91.4 81 1 .3 .3 91.7 96 32 6.5 6.5 98.2 INSUFICIENTEMENTE ES 97 4 .9 .9 99.1 NO CONTESTO 98 3 .5 .5 99.6 NO SABE 99 2 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE M3 POR QUE ESTACION DE RADIO SE ENTERA DE P Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTROS 10 4 .7 .7 .7 XEW 11 8 1.7 1.7 2.4 12 7 1.4 1.5 3.9 13 1 .2 .2 4.1 14 2 .5 .5 4.6 15 3 .6 .6 5.2 16 10 2.0 2.0 7.2 17 55 11.1 11.1 18.3 18 1 .3 .3 18.6 19 2 .4 .4 18.9 20 1 .2 .2 19.1 21 5 1.0 1.0 20.1 22 2 .4 .4 20.5 24 15 2.9 2.9 23.5 25 2 .4 .4 23.9 26 11 2.3 2.3 26.2 27 3 .6 .6 26.7 28 9 1.7 1.7 28.5 29 1 .2 .2 28.6 30 2 .4 .4 29.0 PEDRO FERRIZ 31 4 .8 .8 29.8 32 5 1.1 1.1 30.9 LA MEXICANA 33 2 .5 .5 31.4 34 1 .2 .2 31.6 35 1 .2 .2 31.7 36 2 .4 .4 32.2 37 4 .8 .8 33.0 38 1 .2 .2 33.1 39 2 .3 .3 33.5 40 3 .6 .6 34.1 41 3 .5 .5 34.6 42 1 .3 .3 34.9 43 1 .2 .2 35.1 45 1 .2 .2 35.2 90.1 71 1 .3 .3 35.5 96 255 50.9 51.2 86.7 INSUFICIENTEMENTE ES 97 20 3.9 4.0 90.7 NO CONTESTO 98 21 4.2 4.2 94.9 NO SABE 99 26 5.1 5.1 100.0 0 3 .6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 497 Missing cases 3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE M4 POR QUE PERIODICO SE ENTERA DE POLITICA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 1 .2 .2 .2 11 17 3.4 3.4 3.6 EL SOL 12 276 55.1 55.2 58.9 13 1 .3 .3 59.2 14 6 1.3 1.3 60.4 15 2 .5 .5 60.9 16 1 .3 .3 61.2 NORTE DE MONTERREY 17 2 .5 .5 61.7 23 2 .4 .4 62.1 46 1 .2 .2 62.2 61 1 .1 .1 62.4 69 1 .2 .2 62.5 76 1 .3 .3 62.8 79 1 .3 .3 63.1 96 161 32.2 32.2 95.3 INSUFICIENTEMENTE ES 97 6 1.2 1.2 96.5 NO CONTESTO 98 12 2.4 2.4 98.9 NO SABE 99 5 1.1 1.1 100.0 0 1 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 499 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4 SITUACION PERSONAL HACE UN AŅO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 62 12.4 12.4 12.4 IGUAL 2 140 28.0 28.0 40.4 PEOR 3 296 59.1 59.1 99.5 N/S 4 1 .2 .2 99.7 N/C 5 1 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE P5 SITUACION PERSONAL PROXIMO AŅO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 134 26.7 26.7 26.7 IGUAL 2 205 41.1 41.1 67.8 PEOR 3 126 25.2 25.2 93.0 N/S 4 34 6.7 6.7 99.7 N/C 5 1 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5_1 PEOR, POR QUE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEVALUACION 1 35 7.1 28.1 28.1 CRISIS ECONOMICA 2 39 7.9 31.3 59.5 BAJOS SALARIOS 3 19 3.8 15.0 74.5 MAL GOBIERNO 4 14 2.9 11.4 85.8 DESEMPLEO 11 10 2.1 8.2 94.0 15 1 .2 .9 94.9 42 1 .3 1.0 95.9 NO CONTESTO 98 4 .7 2.8 98.7 NO SABE 99 2 .3 1.3 100.0 0 374 74.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 126 Missing cases 374 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE P6_1 AGUA POTABLE, MEJORO O EMPEORO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJORARON 1 178 35.6 35.6 35.6 SIGUEN IGUAL BIEN 2 214 42.7 42.7 78.3 SIGUEN IGUAL MAL 3 40 8.1 8.1 86.4 EMPEORARON 4 59 11.9 11.9 98.3 N/S 5 9 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6_2 POLICIA, MEJORO O EMPEORO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJORARON 1 54 10.7 10.7 10.7 SIGUEN IGUAL BIEN 2 71 14.1 14.1 24.9 SIGUEN IGUAL MAL 3 141 28.2 28.2 53.1 EMPEORARON 4 191 38.3 38.3 91.3 N/S 5 42 8.4 8.4 99.7 N/C 6 2 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6_3 TRANSPORTE PUBLICO, MEJORO O EMPEORO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJORARON 1 265 53.1 53.1 53.1 SIGUEN IGUAL BIEN 2 114 22.7 22.7 75.8 SIGUEN IGUAL MAL 3 47 9.4 9.4 85.1 EMPEORARON 4 57 11.4 11.4 96.5 N/S 5 17 3.5 3.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE P7 SITUACION POLITICA DEL PAIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PELIGROSA 1 64 12.8 12.8 12.8 PREOCUPANTE 2 371 74.2 74.2 87.0 TRANQUILA 3 38 7.6 7.6 94.7 MEJOR QUE ANTES 4 10 2.0 2.0 96.6 N/S 5 10 1.9 1.9 98.5 N/C 6 7 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8 QUE TANTO IMPORTA QUIEN SERA PROXIMO PDT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHISIMO 1 12 2.5 2.5 2.5 MUCHO 2 225 45.1 45.1 47.6 REGULAR 3 59 11.8 11.8 59.4 POCO 4 102 20.4 20.4 79.8 MUY POCO 5 7 1.5 1.5 81.3 NADA 6 81 16.2 16.2 97.4 N/C 7 13 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE P9 QUE SE ACERCA MAS A LO QUE PIENSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VOTA POR EL MISMO 1 215 43.1 43.1 43.1 POR UNO O POR OTRO 2 233 46.5 46.5 89.6 CON NINGUNA 3 30 5.9 5.9 95.6 N/S 4 13 2.5 2.5 98.1 N/C 5 9 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P10 MPIO HA MEJORADO O EMPEORADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent HA MEJORADO 1 116 23.1 23.1 23.1 NO HA CAMBIADO 2 180 35.9 35.9 59.0 HA EMPEORADO 3 177 35.4 35.4 94.4 N/S 4 25 4.9 4.9 99.3 N/C 5 3 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P11 SABE QUIEN ES EL CANDIDATO DEL PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 159 31.8 31.8 31.8 NO 2 339 67.8 67.8 99.6 N/C 3 2 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE P11_1 SI, QUIEN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CORRECTO 1 118 23.7 74.5 74.5 INCORRECTO 2 32 6.4 20.0 94.5 N/C 3 9 1.7 5.5 100.0 0 341 68.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 159 Missing cases 341 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P11_1A QUE OPINION TIENE UD DE EL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 44 8.8 37.2 37.2 REGULAR 2 19 3.7 15.8 53.0 MALA 3 9 1.8 7.6 60.6 NO SABE 4 41 8.2 34.8 95.4 NO CONTESTO 5 5 1.1 4.6 100.0 0 382 76.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 118 Missing cases 382 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P12 SABE QUIEN ES EL CANDIDATO DEL PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 321 64.2 64.2 64.2 NO 2 177 35.5 35.5 99.7 N/C 3 1 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE P12_1 SI, QUIEN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CORRECTO 1 300 60.0 93.4 93.4 INCORRECTO 2 16 3.2 4.9 98.3 N/C 3 5 1.1 1.7 100.0 0 179 35.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 321 Missing cases 179 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P12_1A QUE OPINION TIENE UD DE EL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 66 13.3 22.1 22.1 REGULAR 2 79 15.7 26.2 48.4 MALA 3 70 14.0 23.4 71.7 NO SABE 4 75 15.0 25.0 96.7 NO CONTESTO 5 10 2.0 3.3 100.0 0 200 40.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 200 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PAA_1 QUIEN ES MAS CLARO AL HABLAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 94 18.9 18.9 18.9 PRI 2 105 21.0 21.0 39.8 PRD 3 81 16.2 16.2 56.0 NINGUNO 4 75 15.1 15.1 71.0 N/S-N/C 5 145 29.0 29.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE PAA_2 QUIEN TIENE MAS CERCANIA CON PUEBLO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 75 15.1 15.1 15.1 PRI 2 145 29.0 29.0 44.0 PRD 3 77 15.5 15.5 59.5 NINGUNO 4 59 11.7 11.7 71.2 N/S-N/C 5 144 28.8 28.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_1 VOTOS AL PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 352 70.4 70.4 70.4 UNO 1 15 3.0 3.0 73.3 DOS 2 37 7.4 7.4 80.7 TRES 3 20 3.9 3.9 84.6 CUATRO 4 2 .4 .4 85.1 CINCO 5 75 14.9 14.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_2 VOTOS AL PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 327 65.3 65.3 65.3 UNO 1 24 4.8 4.8 70.1 DOS 2 30 5.9 5.9 76.0 TRES 3 7 1.3 1.3 77.4 CUATRO 4 1 .3 .3 77.7 CINCO 5 112 22.3 22.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE PVOT_3 VOTOS AL PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 376 75.3 75.3 75.3 UNO 1 23 4.6 4.6 79.9 DOS 2 25 5.0 5.0 84.9 TRES 3 14 2.8 2.8 87.7 CUATRO 4 1 .2 .2 87.9 CINCO 5 61 12.1 12.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_4 VOTOS A OTRO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 479 95.8 95.8 95.8 UNO 1 2 .5 .5 96.2 DOS 2 6 1.2 1.2 97.4 TRES 3 2 .5 .5 97.9 CINCO 5 11 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_5 VOTOS A ABSTENCION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 433 86.5 86.5 86.5 DOS 2 1 .2 .2 86.7 CINCO 5 66 13.3 13.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE PVOT_6 VOTOS NO SABE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 423 84.5 84.5 84.5 TRES 3 3 .6 .6 85.1 CINCO 5 75 14.9 14.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_7 VOTOS NO CONTESTO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 482 96.3 96.3 96.3 CINCO 5 18 3.7 3.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P14 EN POLITICA QUE PREFIERE UD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENO POR CONOCIDO 1 152 30.4 30.4 30.4 NO ARRIESGA NO GANA 2 281 56.2 56.2 86.6 NINGUNA 3 34 6.8 6.8 93.4 N/S 4 23 4.7 4.7 98.1 N/C 5 10 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE PAB_1 QUIEN ESTA MAS PREPARADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 83 16.5 16.5 16.5 PRI 2 146 29.3 29.3 45.8 PRD 3 68 13.6 13.6 59.5 NINGUNO 4 27 5.3 5.3 64.8 N/S-N/C 5 176 35.2 35.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PAB_2 QUIEN ES MAS SINCERO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 82 16.3 16.3 16.3 PRI 2 102 20.3 20.3 36.7 PRD 3 73 14.6 14.6 51.2 NINGUNO 4 59 11.9 11.9 63.1 N/S-N/C 5 184 36.9 36.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P15 ACUERDO CON EL PRESIDENTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 162 32.4 32.4 32.4 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 86 17.2 17.2 49.6 DESACUERDO EN PARTE 3 167 33.4 33.4 83.0 DESACUERDO 4 62 12.5 12.5 95.5 N/S 5 19 3.7 3.7 99.3 N/C 6 4 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE P16 CUAL SE ACERCA A LO QUE UD PIENSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AL GOB EL IMPORTA MU 1 113 22.6 22.6 22.6 AL GOB NO LE IMPORTA 2 367 73.4 73.4 96.0 NINGUNA 3 7 1.4 1.4 97.4 N/S 4 12 2.4 2.4 99.8 N/C 5 1 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P17 MAS IMPORTANTE AL DECIDIR, CANDIDATO O P Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CANDIDATO 1 318 63.6 63.6 63.6 PARTIDO 2 140 28.0 28.0 91.6 NO SABE 3 30 6.0 6.0 97.6 NO CONTESTO 4 12 2.4 2.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P18 EN PROX GOB: EXPERIENCIA U OPCION DE CAM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXPERIENCIA E INTELI 1 236 47.2 47.2 47.2 OPCION DE CAMBIO 2 242 48.4 48.4 95.5 NINGUNA 3 5 1.0 1.0 96.6 N/S 4 13 2.6 2.6 99.1 N/C 5 4 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE P19 ENTRE PAN Y PRI POR CUAL CANDIDATO VOTAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CAND PAN 1 205 41.1 41.1 41.1 CAND PRI 2 159 31.7 31.7 72.8 NINGUNO 3 76 15.2 15.2 88.0 N/S 4 39 7.9 7.9 95.9 N/C 5 21 4.1 4.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P20 ACUERDO CON EL GOBERNADOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 288 57.5 57.5 57.5 DESACUERDO 2 162 32.5 32.5 90.0 NO SABE 3 37 7.4 7.4 97.4 NO CONTESTO 4 12 2.4 2.4 99.8 5 1 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P21 POR QUE PARTIDO VOTO EN ELECCIONES DE 94 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 82 16.4 16.4 16.4 PRI 2 180 36.0 36.0 52.4 PRD 3 83 16.6 16.6 69.0 OTRO 4 25 4.9 4.9 73.9 NO SABE 5 39 7.8 7.8 81.8 NO CONTESTO 6 91 18.2 18.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE P22 SE CONSIDERA PRIISTA, PANISTA O PERREDIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PRIISTA 1 131 26.3 26.3 26.3 PANISTA 2 64 12.7 12.7 39.0 PERREDISTA 3 45 9.1 9.1 48.1 NO SE IDENTIFICA CON 4 239 47.8 47.8 95.9 OTRO 5 9 1.8 1.8 97.7 N/C 6 11 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P22_1 QUE TANTO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHISIMO 1 31 6.1 12.8 12.8 MUCHO 2 103 20.7 43.0 55.7 ALGO 3 67 13.4 27.9 83.7 POCO 4 30 6.0 12.4 96.1 N/S 5 1 .3 .6 96.6 N/C 6 8 1.6 3.4 100.0 0 260 51.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 240 Missing cases 260 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23 AUTS SERAN IMPARCIALES O FAVORECERAN A P Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent IMPARCIALES 1 258 51.6 51.6 51.6 FAVORECERAN A PARTID 2 183 36.7 36.7 88.3 NO SABE 3 45 9.1 9.1 97.4 NO CONTESTO 4 13 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE P23_1 FAVORECERAN, A CUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 5 1.0 2.7 2.7 PRI 2 159 31.9 86.8 89.6 PRD 3 1 .3 .7 90.3 NO SABE 4 11 2.3 6.2 96.4 NO CONTESTO 5 7 1.3 3.6 100.0 0 317 63.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 183 Missing cases 317 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P24 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 12 2.3 2.3 2.3 2 191 38.1 38.1 40.5 3 54 10.7 10.7 51.2 4 138 27.6 27.6 78.8 5 7 1.4 1.4 80.2 6 81 16.3 16.3 96.5 7 18 3.5 3.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE P25 QUE TAN PROBABLE QUE VAYA A VOTAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent POCO PROBABLE 1 41 8.2 8.2 8.2 2 5 1.1 1.1 9.3 3 6 1.2 1.2 10.5 4 4 .8 .8 11.3 5 21 4.2 4.2 15.6 6 9 1.9 1.9 17.5 7 17 3.5 3.5 20.9 8 53 10.7 10.7 31.6 9 55 11.0 11.0 42.6 MUY PROBABLE 10 273 54.7 54.7 97.3 NO CONTESTO 98 3 .7 .7 98.0 NO SABE 99 10 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX SEXO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 232 46.5 46.5 46.5 femenino 2 268 53.5 53.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE EDAD EDAD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 141 28.2 28.2 28.2 26-40 2 184 36.8 36.8 65.0 41-60 3 125 25.0 25.0 89.9 61 o + 4 49 9.8 9.8 99.8 99 1 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INST INSTITUCION DONDE TRABAJA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 288 57.5 57.5 57.5 gob fed 2 76 15.2 15.2 72.7 paraestatal 3 9 1.7 1.7 74.4 emp priv 4 67 13.4 13.4 87.8 negocio prop 5 37 7.4 7.4 95.2 independiente 6 24 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 167 33.4 58.1 58.1 estudiante 2 71 14.2 24.7 82.8 jubilado 3 36 7.3 12.6 95.5 desemp 4 10 2.0 3.6 99.0 otro 5 3 .6 1.0 100.0 0 212 42.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 288 Missing cases 212 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE PUESTO Que puesto ocupa en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario, Patron o 1 18 3.7 8.7 8.7 Directivo o Func de 2 12 2.4 5.5 14.2 Contratista o trabaj 3 38 7.6 17.9 32.2 Profesionista Indepe 4 5 .9 2.2 34.3 Emplea, trabaj, Obre 5 138 27.6 64.9 99.2 trabajador sin pago 6 1 .2 .4 99.6 50 1 .2 .4 100.0 0 288 57.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 212 Missing cases 288 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 13 2.7 2.7 2.7 prim inc 2 45 9.1 9.1 11.7 prim comp 3 89 17.7 17.7 29.4 sec incom 4 20 4.1 4.1 33.5 sec comp 5 91 18.1 18.1 51.6 prep incom 6 30 6.0 6.0 57.6 prep comp 7 65 13.1 13.1 70.7 univ incom 8 69 13.8 13.8 84.5 univ comp + 9 77 15.5 15.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 80 16.0 16.0 16.0 1-3 sm 2 162 32.5 32.5 48.5 3-5 sm 3 99 19.9 19.9 68.3 5-7 sm 4 61 12.3 12.3 80.6 7-10 5 64 12.8 12.8 93.4 10 + SM 6 33 6.6 6.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEPEN PERSONAS DEPENDEN DE ESTE INGRESO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 12 2.4 2.4 2.4 2 53 10.5 10.5 13.0 3 107 21.4 21.4 34.3 4 149 29.7 29.7 64.1 5 83 16.7 16.7 80.8 6 61 12.2 12.2 92.9 7 20 3.9 3.9 96.8 8 8 1.6 1.6 98.5 9 3 .6 .6 99.1 10 2 .3 .3 99.5 11 1 .2 .2 99.6 20 1 .2 .2 99.8 50 1 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 32 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE TEL HAY TELEFONO EN SU HOGAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 303 60.6 60.6 60.6 NO 2 195 38.9 38.9 99.5 NC 3 3 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AUTO CUANTOS AUTOMOVILES HAY EN SU HOGAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NINGUNO 1 256 51.3 51.3 51.3 UNO 2 190 37.9 37.9 89.2 DOS 3 43 8.7 8.7 97.9 TRES 4 6 1.1 1.1 99.0 CUATRO O MAS 5 5 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESCUELA VAN A ESCUELAS PUBLICAS O PRIVADAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PUBLICAS 1 260 52.0 52.0 52.0 PRIVADAS 2 70 13.9 13.9 65.9 AMBAS 3 23 4.6 4.6 70.5 NINGUNA ESTUDIA 4 144 28.7 28.7 99.2 NC 5 4 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 33 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE RELIG TIENE USTED ALGUNA RELIGION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 464 92.7 92.7 92.7 NO 2 34 6.8 6.8 99.5 NC 3 2 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RELIG_1 CUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CATOLICA 1 429 85.9 92.6 92.6 OTRO 10 1 .1 .2 92.8 CRISTIANA 11 7 1.4 1.5 94.3 EVANGELISTA 12 10 2.0 2.1 96.4 TESTIGO DE JEHOVA 13 5 .9 1.0 97.4 BAUTISTA 16 2 .5 .5 97.9 MORMON 17 2 .3 .4 98.2 PROTESTANTE 18 4 .8 .9 99.1 PENTECOSTES 19 2 .4 .4 99.5 NS 99 2 .4 .5 100.0 0 36 7.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 464 Missing cases 36 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 34 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE HABITA_1 CUANTAS TIENEN DE 0 A 12 AŅOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 117 23.3 23.3 23.3 2 90 18.1 18.1 41.4 3 35 7.0 7.0 48.4 4 8 1.5 1.5 49.9 5 1 .2 .2 50.1 6 0 .1 .1 50.2 NINGUNA 96 248 49.6 49.6 99.8 NC 98 1 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HABITA_2 CUANTAS TIENEN DE 12 A 18 AŅOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 100 20.0 20.0 20.0 2 46 9.2 9.2 29.2 3 10 2.0 2.0 31.2 4 1 .2 .2 31.4 NINGUNA 96 342 68.4 68.4 99.8 NC 98 1 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 35 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE HABITA_3 CUANTAS TIENEN DE 18 A 64 AŅOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 26 5.2 5.2 5.2 2 203 40.6 40.6 45.7 3 119 23.8 23.8 69.5 4 75 15.0 15.0 84.5 5 41 8.2 8.2 92.7 6 18 3.7 3.7 96.4 7 0 .1 .1 96.5 8 4 .9 .9 97.4 9 2 .4 .4 97.8 24 1 .2 .2 97.9 NINGUNA 96 10 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HABITA_4 CUANTAS TIENEN MAS DE 64 AŅOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 22 4.5 4.5 4.5 2 7 1.4 1.4 5.9 3 4 .8 .8 6.7 NINGUNA 96 465 93.0 93.0 99.8 NC 98 1 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 36 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE PELE_1 ELECC PDTE MPAL POR CUAL PARTIDO VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 96 19.2 19.3 19.3 PRI 2 116 23.2 23.2 42.6 PRD 4 75 15.0 15.0 57.6 PFCRN 5 2 .4 .4 58.0 PARM 6 1 .3 .3 58.3 PT 8 7 1.5 1.5 59.7 PVEM 9 9 1.8 1.8 61.5 NINGUNO 11 53 10.7 10.7 72.2 NS 12 123 24.7 24.7 97.0 BLANCO 13 13 2.5 2.6 99.5 NULO 14 2 .5 .5 100.0 . 2 .4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 498 Missing cases 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE_2 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 94 18.8 18.9 18.9 PRI 2 121 24.2 24.3 43.2 PRD 4 60 12.0 12.1 55.3 PFCRN 5 2 .3 .3 55.6 PT 8 9 1.9 1.9 57.5 PVEM 9 5 1.1 1.1 58.6 OTRO 10 1 .3 .3 58.9 NINGUNO 11 52 10.4 10.5 69.4 NS 12 132 26.4 26.6 95.9 BLANCO 13 17 3.5 3.5 99.4 NULO 14 3 .6 .6 100.0 . 2 .4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 498 Missing cases 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 37 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE This procedure was completed at 23:59:44 The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 501 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 6253 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 781 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE_1 ELECC PDTE MPAL POR CUAL PARTIDO VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 96 19.2 31.4 31.4 PRI 2 116 23.2 37.8 69.2 PRD 4 75 15.0 24.4 93.6 OTRO 10 20 3.9 6.4 100.0 0 194 38.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 306 Missing cases 194 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE_2 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 94 18.8 32.1 32.1 PRI 2 121 24.2 41.3 73.4 PRD 4 60 12.0 20.5 93.9 OTRO 10 18 3.6 6.1 100.0 0 207 41.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 293 Missing cases 207 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 38 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE P12A1 SI, QUIEN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 339 67.8 67.8 67.8 CORRECTO 1 139 27.8 27.8 95.6 INCORRECTO 2 19 3.8 3.8 99.4 N/C 3 3 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P12A2 QUE OPINION TIENE UD DE EL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 361 72.2 72.2 72.2 BUENA 1 49 9.8 9.8 82.0 REGULAR 2 38 7.6 7.6 89.6 MALA 3 10 1.9 1.9 91.6 NO SABE 4 35 7.0 7.0 98.6 NO CONTESTO 5 7 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 39 PRE-ELECTORAL CD MADERO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN CDMADERO.FRE This procedure was completed at 23:59:46