The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 499 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 6253 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 781 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MUN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 33 500 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE P1 CUANTAS PERSONAS MAYORES DE 18 AŅOS VIVE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 32 6.3 6.3 6.3 2 225 44.9 44.9 51.2 3 91 18.1 18.1 69.4 4 86 17.2 17.2 86.6 5 29 5.9 5.9 92.5 6 22 4.3 4.3 96.8 7 10 2.0 2.0 98.8 8 5 .9 .9 99.7 9 2 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 SITUACION ECONOMICA DEL PAIS HACE UN AŅO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 25 4.9 4.9 4.9 IGUAL 2 88 17.6 17.6 22.5 PEOR 3 367 73.5 73.5 96.0 N/S 4 20 4.0 4.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE P3 SITUACION ECONOMICA DEL PAIS PROXIMO AŅO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 83 16.6 16.6 16.6 IGUAL 2 127 25.3 25.3 41.9 PEOR 3 182 36.4 36.4 78.3 N/S 4 107 21.4 21.4 99.8 N/C 5 1 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P3_1 PEOR, POR QUE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTROS 10 6 1.1 3.1 3.1 MALA ADMON 11 1 .2 .7 3.8 DEVALUACION 12 50 9.9 27.3 31.1 INFLACION 13 28 5.5 15.3 46.4 MAL GOBIERNO 14 8 1.6 4.3 50.7 DESEMPLEO 15 10 1.9 5.4 56.1 CRISIS ECONOMICA 17 24 4.8 13.3 69.3 BAJOS SALARIOS 19 4 .8 2.2 71.6 PROBLEMAS POLITICOS 21 3 .6 1.6 73.1 POBREZA 26 2 .5 1.4 74.5 91 1 .1 .3 74.8 96 3 .5 1.5 76.3 INSUFICIENTEMENTE ES 97 21 4.2 11.5 87.8 NO CONTESTO 98 9 1.8 4.9 92.8 NO SABE 99 13 2.6 7.2 100.0 0 319 63.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 181 Missing cases 319 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE M1_1 CUANTAS VECES LEE LA SECCION POLITICA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 53 10.7 10.7 10.7 2 43 8.7 8.7 19.4 3 26 5.2 5.2 24.5 4 9 1.8 1.8 26.3 5 4 .8 .8 27.1 6 6 1.3 1.3 28.4 7 43 8.7 8.7 37.1 15 1 .3 .3 37.3 16 1 .2 .2 37.5 27 1 .1 .1 37.7 NUNCA 96 308 61.6 61.6 99.3 97 1 .1 .1 99.4 NO CONTESTO 98 2 .4 .4 99.8 99 1 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - M1_2 CUANTAS VECES VE NOTICIAS EN TV Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 14 2.8 2.8 2.8 2 42 8.3 8.3 11.2 3 37 7.3 7.3 18.5 4 21 4.2 4.2 22.7 5 7 1.3 1.3 24.1 6 3 .7 .7 24.8 7 319 63.9 64.0 88.8 8 1 .3 .3 89.0 13 1 .2 .2 89.2 14 1 .3 .3 89.5 16 1 .2 .2 89.7 27 1 .2 .2 89.9 33 1 .2 .2 90.0 71 1 .1 .1 90.2 NUNCA 96 48 9.6 9.6 99.8 NO CONTESTO 98 1 .2 .2 100.0 0 1 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 499 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE M1_3 CUANTAS VECES ESCUCHA NOTICIAS EN RADIO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 14 2.9 2.9 2.9 2 33 6.6 6.6 9.5 3 40 8.0 8.0 17.5 4 13 2.7 2.7 20.1 5 10 2.1 2.1 22.2 6 2 .4 .4 22.6 7 114 22.7 22.8 45.4 16 3 .6 .6 46.0 40 1 .2 .2 46.2 66 1 .1 .1 46.3 73 1 .2 .2 46.5 NUNCA 96 267 53.4 53.5 100.0 0 1 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 499 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE M2 POR QUE CANAL DE TV SE ENTERA DE POLITIC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 2 3 .6 .6 .6 4 1 .2 .2 .8 6 2 .3 .3 1.1 7 3 .7 .7 1.8 8 1 .1 .1 2.0 9 9 1.8 1.8 3.8 OTROS 10 2 .4 .4 4.2 4 11 1 .1 .1 4.3 2 12 36 7.2 7.2 11.5 13 TV AZTECA 13 3 .7 .7 12.2 7 14 60 12.1 12.1 24.3 9 16 255 51.0 51.0 75.2 19 1 .1 .1 75.4 21 1 .2 .2 75.6 TELEMUNDO 22 2 .5 .5 76.1 26 1 .1 .1 76.2 48 30 50 9.9 9.9 86.1 45 31 1 .1 .1 86.3 UNIVISION 32 4 .8 .8 87.1 8 33 5 1.0 1.0 88.1 48 1 .2 .2 88.3 81 1 .1 .1 88.4 96 49 9.8 9.8 98.2 INSUFICIENTEMENTE ES 97 2 .5 .5 98.7 NO CONTESTO 98 2 .3 .3 99.0 NO SABE 99 5 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE M3 POR QUE ESTACION DE RADIO SE ENTERA DE P Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 4 1 .3 .3 .3 9 2 .3 .3 .6 OTROS 10 13 2.7 2.7 3.3 XEW 11 2 .4 .4 3.6 12 1 .1 .1 3.7 16 7 1.3 1.3 5.1 17 2 .3 .3 5.4 28 1 .2 .2 5.6 PEDRO FERRIZ 31 2 .3 .3 5.9 LA MEXICANA 33 2 .4 .4 6.3 36 1 .3 .3 6.5 37 1 .2 .2 6.7 45 1 .3 .3 7.0 TEXANO 46 1 .3 .3 7.2 KGBT 47 30 5.9 5.9 13.1 LA CONSENTIDA 48 6 1.1 1.1 14.3 LA ESPERANZA 50 4 .7 .7 15.0 SUPER ESTELAR 51 11 2.2 2.2 17.3 ESTEREO MAR 52 16 3.1 3.1 20.4 LA DE REYNOSA 53 14 2.9 2.9 23.3 LA PANTERA 54 5 .9 1.0 24.2 RADIO MATAMOROS 55 7 1.3 1.3 25.6 RADIO GALLITO 56 4 .7 .7 26.3 CORPORRADIO 57 1 .2 .2 26.5 KQXX 58 10 1.9 1.9 28.4 XRT 59 6 1.2 1.2 29.6 XEQB 60 1 .2 .2 29.8 11.70 61 1 .1 .1 29.9 102.5 62 5 1.0 1.0 30.9 FM 91 63 1 .3 .3 31.2 98.5 64 1 .3 .3 31.5 XEFBD 65 13 2.7 2.7 34.2 XEOR 66 2 .3 .3 34.5 XFD 68 5 1.0 1.0 35.5 92.2 69 2 .4 .4 35.9 RKS 70 1 .1 .1 36.1 90.1 71 6 1.2 1.2 37.3 LA CUMBIANCHERA 72 1 .2 .2 37.5 XOQ 73 1 .2 .2 37.8 RADIO ACIR 75 1 .2 .2 37.9 76 1 .2 .2 38.1 79 1 .1 .1 38.3 83 1 .1 .1 38.4 96 252 50.3 50.4 88.8 INSUFICIENTEMENTE ES 97 14 2.9 2.9 91.7 NO CONTESTO 98 5 1.0 1.0 92.7 NO SABE 99 37 7.3 7.3 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE M3 POR QUE ESTACION DE RADIO SE ENTERA DE P Valid cases 499 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - M4 POR QUE PERIODICO SE ENTERA DE POLITICA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EL SOL 12 2 .4 .4 .4 NORTE DE MONTERREY 17 12 2.5 2.5 2.9 MAŅANA 18 153 30.5 30.5 33.5 LA TARDE 19 10 2.0 2.0 35.4 INFORMATIVO 20 1 .2 .2 35.6 LA PRENSA 21 8 1.6 1.6 37.2 RIO 22 5 .9 .9 38.1 30 1 .1 .1 38.2 33 1 .2 .2 38.5 47 1 .1 .1 38.6 56 1 .2 .2 38.8 58 1 .2 .2 39.0 61 1 .1 .1 39.1 81 1 .2 .2 39.3 96 289 57.7 57.7 97.1 INSUFICIENTEMENTE ES 97 2 .4 .4 97.5 NO CONTESTO 98 2 .4 .4 97.9 NO SABE 99 11 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4 SITUACION PERSONAL HACE UN AŅO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 92 18.4 18.4 18.4 IGUAL 2 167 33.4 33.4 51.8 PEOR 3 235 47.1 47.1 98.9 N/S 4 4 .8 .8 99.7 N/C 5 2 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE P5 SITUACION PERSONAL PROXIMO AŅO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 149 29.7 29.7 29.7 IGUAL 2 156 31.3 31.3 61.0 PEOR 3 118 23.6 23.6 84.6 N/S 4 75 15.0 15.0 99.6 N/C 5 2 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5_1 PEOR, POR QUE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEVALUACION 1 33 6.6 28.2 28.2 CRISIS ECONOMICA 2 44 8.8 37.5 65.6 BAJOS SALARIOS 3 23 4.6 19.5 85.2 MAL GOBIERNO 4 6 1.2 5.2 90.4 OTROS 10 1 .3 1.1 91.5 DESEMPLEO 11 1 .2 .8 92.3 22 1 .2 .9 93.1 30 2 .4 1.7 94.8 32 1 .2 .7 95.6 INSUFICIENTEMENTE ES 97 1 .2 .8 96.4 NO CONTESTO 98 3 .7 2.8 99.2 NO SABE 99 1 .2 .8 100.0 0 382 76.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 118 Missing cases 382 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE P6_1 AGUA POTABLE, MEJORO O EMPEORO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJORARON 1 115 22.9 22.9 22.9 SIGUEN IGUAL BIEN 2 119 23.8 23.8 46.8 SIGUEN IGUAL MAL 3 113 22.6 22.6 69.4 EMPEORARON 4 121 24.2 24.2 93.6 N/S 5 27 5.3 5.3 99.0 N/C 6 5 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6_2 POLICIA, MEJORO O EMPEORO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJORARON 1 113 22.5 22.5 22.5 SIGUEN IGUAL BIEN 2 95 19.0 19.0 41.5 SIGUEN IGUAL MAL 3 91 18.2 18.2 59.7 EMPEORARON 4 74 14.8 14.8 74.5 N/S 5 122 24.5 24.5 99.0 N/C 6 5 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE P6_3 TRANSPORTE PUBLICO, MEJORO O EMPEORO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJORARON 1 180 36.0 36.0 36.0 SIGUEN IGUAL BIEN 2 93 18.5 18.5 54.6 SIGUEN IGUAL MAL 3 63 12.6 12.6 67.2 EMPEORARON 4 47 9.3 9.3 76.6 N/S 5 107 21.3 21.3 97.9 N/C 6 11 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7 SITUACION POLITICA DEL PAIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PELIGROSA 1 72 14.4 14.4 14.4 PREOCUPANTE 2 272 54.4 54.4 68.8 TRANQUILA 3 80 16.1 16.1 84.8 MEJOR QUE ANTES 4 20 4.0 4.0 88.8 N/S 5 52 10.4 10.4 99.3 N/C 6 4 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE P8 QUE TANTO IMPORTA QUIEN SERA PROXIMO PDT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHISIMO 1 13 2.5 2.5 2.5 MUCHO 2 224 44.9 44.9 47.4 REGULAR 3 55 11.0 11.0 58.4 POCO 4 112 22.5 22.5 80.9 MUY POCO 5 8 1.5 1.5 82.4 NADA 6 78 15.5 15.5 97.9 N/C 7 11 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9 QUE SE ACERCA MAS A LO QUE PIENSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VOTA POR EL MISMO 1 207 41.4 41.4 41.4 POR UNO O POR OTRO 2 215 43.0 43.0 84.4 CON NINGUNA 3 32 6.4 6.4 90.7 N/S 4 32 6.5 6.5 97.2 N/C 5 14 2.8 2.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P10 MPIO HA MEJORADO O EMPEORADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent HA MEJORADO 1 373 74.7 74.7 74.7 NO HA CAMBIADO 2 85 16.9 16.9 91.6 HA EMPEORADO 3 21 4.2 4.2 95.7 N/S 4 20 4.0 4.0 99.8 N/C 5 1 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE P11 SABE QUIEN ES EL CANDIDATO DEL PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 326 65.2 65.2 65.2 NO 2 173 34.7 34.7 99.9 N/C 3 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P11_1 SI, QUIEN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CORRECTO 1 275 55.0 84.3 84.3 INCORRECTO 2 46 9.3 14.2 98.5 N/C 3 5 1.0 1.5 100.0 0 174 34.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 326 Missing cases 174 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P11_1A QUE OPINION TIENE UD DE EL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 82 16.3 29.7 29.7 REGULAR 2 64 12.7 23.2 52.9 MALA 3 13 2.7 4.8 57.7 NO SABE 4 114 22.7 41.3 99.0 NO CONTESTO 5 3 .5 1.0 100.0 0 225 45.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 275 Missing cases 225 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE P12 SABE QUIEN ES EL CANDIDATO DEL PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 354 70.8 70.8 70.8 NO 2 146 29.2 29.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P12_1 SI, QUIEN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CORRECTO 1 324 64.8 91.5 91.5 INCORRECTO 2 28 5.5 7.8 99.4 N/C 3 2 .5 .6 100.0 0 146 29.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 146 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P12_1A QUE OPINION TIENE UD DE EL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 101 20.2 31.1 31.1 REGULAR 2 68 13.6 21.0 52.1 MALA 3 22 4.3 6.7 58.8 NO SABE 4 127 25.4 39.3 98.1 NO CONTESTO 5 6 1.2 1.9 100.0 0 176 35.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 324 Missing cases 176 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE PAA_1 QUIEN ES MAS CLARO AL HABLAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 67 13.5 13.5 13.5 PRI 2 115 23.0 23.0 36.5 PRD 3 21 4.1 4.1 40.6 NINGUNO 4 51 10.1 10.1 50.7 N/S-N/C 5 246 49.3 49.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PAA_2 QUIEN TIENE MAS CERCANIA CON PUEBLO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 110 22.0 22.0 22.0 PRI 2 92 18.4 18.4 40.5 PRD 3 33 6.7 6.7 47.1 NINGUNO 4 44 8.8 8.8 55.9 N/S-N/C 5 220 44.1 44.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_1 VOTOS AL PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 334 66.8 66.8 66.8 UNO 1 19 3.7 3.7 70.5 DOS 2 47 9.5 9.5 80.0 TRES 3 47 9.5 9.5 89.5 CUATRO 4 4 .8 .8 90.3 CINCO 5 48 9.7 9.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE PVOT_2 VOTOS AL PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 309 61.9 61.9 61.9 UNO 1 23 4.7 4.7 66.5 DOS 2 61 12.1 12.1 78.7 TRES 3 17 3.5 3.5 82.1 CUATRO 4 2 .4 .4 82.6 CINCO 5 87 17.4 17.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_3 VOTOS AL PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 367 73.4 73.4 73.4 UNO 1 29 5.8 5.8 79.2 DOS 2 20 4.0 4.0 83.2 TRES 3 29 5.8 5.8 89.1 CUATRO 4 1 .2 .2 89.2 CINCO 5 54 10.8 10.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE PVOT_4 VOTOS A OTRO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 469 93.8 93.8 93.8 UNO 1 2 .5 .5 94.3 DOS 2 6 1.2 1.2 95.5 TRES 3 6 1.2 1.2 96.7 CUATRO 4 1 .2 .2 96.9 CINCO 5 16 3.1 3.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_5 VOTOS A ABSTENCION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 463 92.7 92.7 92.7 UNO 1 2 .4 .4 93.1 TRES 3 2 .4 .4 93.4 CINCO 5 33 6.6 6.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_6 VOTOS NO SABE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 407 81.3 81.3 81.3 CUATRO 4 1 .2 .2 81.6 CINCO 5 92 18.4 18.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE PVOT_7 VOTOS NO CONTESTO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 467 93.4 93.4 93.4 TRES 3 1 .2 .2 93.6 CINCO 5 32 6.4 6.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P14 EN POLITICA QUE PREFIERE UD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENO POR CONOCIDO 1 168 33.6 33.6 33.6 NO ARRIESGA NO GANA 2 234 46.9 46.9 80.5 NINGUNA 3 43 8.7 8.7 89.2 N/S 4 49 9.9 9.9 99.1 N/C 5 5 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PAB_1 QUIEN ESTA MAS PREPARADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 60 11.9 11.9 11.9 PRI 2 158 31.5 31.5 43.4 PRD 3 26 5.1 5.1 48.6 NINGUNO 4 29 5.8 5.8 54.4 N/S-N/C 5 228 45.6 45.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE PAB_2 QUIEN ES MAS SINCERO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 88 17.7 17.7 17.7 PRI 2 97 19.3 19.3 37.0 PRD 3 31 6.2 6.2 43.2 NINGUNO 4 41 8.2 8.2 51.5 N/S-N/C 5 243 48.5 48.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P15 ACUERDO CON EL PRESIDENTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 198 39.6 39.6 39.6 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 71 14.2 14.2 53.7 DESACUERDO EN PARTE 3 60 12.0 12.0 65.7 DESACUERDO 4 102 20.4 20.4 86.1 N/S 5 66 13.1 13.1 99.2 N/C 6 4 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P16 CUAL SE ACERCA A LO QUE UD PIENSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AL GOB EL IMPORTA MU 1 165 33.1 33.1 33.1 AL GOB NO LE IMPORTA 2 294 58.9 58.9 92.0 NINGUNA 3 9 1.8 1.8 93.8 N/S 4 29 5.9 5.9 99.7 N/C 5 2 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE P17 MAS IMPORTANTE AL DECIDIR, CANDIDATO O P Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CANDIDATO 1 324 64.8 64.8 64.8 PARTIDO 2 125 25.1 25.1 89.9 NO SABE 3 43 8.7 8.7 98.5 NO CONTESTO 4 7 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P18 EN PROX GOB: EXPERIENCIA U OPCION DE CAM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXPERIENCIA E INTELI 1 234 46.8 46.8 46.8 OPCION DE CAMBIO 2 203 40.7 40.7 87.5 NINGUNA 3 18 3.5 3.5 91.1 N/S 4 39 7.7 7.7 98.8 N/C 5 6 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P19 ENTRE PAN Y PRI POR CUAL CANDIDATO VOTAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CAND PAN 1 180 36.1 36.1 36.1 CAND PRI 2 155 31.0 31.0 67.1 NINGUNO 3 70 14.0 14.0 81.1 N/S 4 77 15.5 15.5 96.6 N/C 5 17 3.4 3.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE P20 ACUERDO CON EL GOBERNADOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 320 64.1 64.1 64.1 DESACUERDO 2 115 23.0 23.0 87.1 NO SABE 3 58 11.7 11.7 98.7 NO CONTESTO 4 6 1.1 1.1 99.9 6 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P21 POR QUE PARTIDO VOTO EN ELECCIONES DE 94 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 86 17.2 17.2 17.2 PRI 2 195 39.1 39.1 56.3 PRD 3 28 5.6 5.6 61.9 OTRO 4 26 5.1 5.1 67.0 NO SABE 5 117 23.3 23.3 90.3 NO CONTESTO 6 48 9.7 9.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P22 SE CONSIDERA PRIISTA, PANISTA O PERREDIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PRIISTA 1 134 26.8 26.8 26.8 PANISTA 2 54 10.8 10.8 37.7 PERREDISTA 3 57 11.4 11.4 49.1 NO SE IDENTIFICA CON 4 239 47.7 47.7 96.8 OTRO 5 2 .3 .3 97.1 N/C 6 14 2.9 2.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE P22_1 QUE TANTO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHISIMO 1 56 11.2 22.9 22.9 MUCHO 2 62 12.5 25.6 48.5 ALGO 3 101 20.2 41.4 89.9 POCO 4 13 2.7 5.5 95.4 N/S 5 7 1.3 2.7 98.1 N/C 6 5 .9 1.9 100.0 0 256 51.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 244 Missing cases 256 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23 AUTS SERAN IMPARCIALES O FAVORECERAN A P Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent IMPARCIALES 1 217 43.5 43.5 43.5 FAVORECERAN A PARTID 2 166 33.3 33.3 76.7 NO SABE 3 106 21.2 21.2 98.0 NO CONTESTO 4 10 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23_1 FAVORECERAN, A CUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 14 2.8 8.5 8.5 PRI 2 98 19.6 59.0 67.5 PRD 3 7 1.3 4.0 71.5 NO SABE 4 43 8.6 25.9 97.4 NO CONTESTO 5 4 .9 2.6 100.0 0 334 66.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 166 Missing cases 334 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE P24 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 7 1.4 1.4 1.4 2 214 42.9 42.9 44.3 3 48 9.5 9.5 53.9 4 114 22.7 22.7 76.6 5 14 2.8 2.8 79.3 6 83 16.6 16.6 95.9 7 20 4.1 4.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P25 QUE TAN PROBABLE QUE VAYA A VOTAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent POCO PROBABLE 1 56 11.2 11.2 11.2 2 4 .8 .8 12.0 3 8 1.6 1.6 13.6 4 3 .5 .5 14.2 5 25 5.0 5.0 19.1 6 7 1.4 1.4 20.5 7 18 3.5 3.5 24.1 8 25 5.0 5.0 29.1 9 30 6.0 6.0 35.1 MUY PROBABLE 10 325 64.9 64.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE SEX SEXO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 249 49.8 49.8 49.8 femenino 2 251 50.2 50.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDAD EDAD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 152 30.3 30.3 30.3 26-40 2 173 34.7 34.7 65.0 41-60 3 125 25.0 25.0 90.0 61 o + 4 50 10.0 10.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INST INSTITUCION DONDE TRABAJA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 262 52.3 52.3 52.3 gob fed 2 48 9.6 9.6 62.0 paraestatal 3 3 .6 .6 62.5 emp priv 4 102 20.4 20.4 83.0 negocio prop 5 30 6.0 6.0 89.0 independiente 6 55 11.0 11.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 190 38.0 72.7 72.7 estudiante 2 24 4.9 9.3 82.0 jubilado 3 12 2.4 4.6 86.5 desemp 4 25 5.0 9.5 96.1 otro 5 10 2.1 3.9 100.0 0 238 47.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 262 Missing cases 238 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUESTO Que puesto ocupa en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario, Patron o 1 20 4.1 8.6 8.6 Directivo o Func de 2 9 1.9 3.9 12.5 Contratista o trabaj 3 45 9.1 19.0 31.5 Profesionista Indepe 4 7 1.5 3.1 34.6 Emplea, trabaj, Obre 5 152 30.5 63.9 98.5 12 1 .1 .3 98.8 21 1 .2 .3 99.1 40 2 .4 .9 100.0 0 262 52.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 238 Missing cases 262 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 41 8.3 8.3 8.3 prim inc 2 113 22.6 22.6 30.9 prim comp 3 101 20.1 20.1 51.0 sec incom 4 44 8.9 8.9 59.9 sec comp 5 68 13.7 13.7 73.6 prep incom 6 35 6.9 6.9 80.5 prep comp 7 49 9.7 9.7 90.2 univ incom 8 19 3.7 3.7 94.0 univ comp + 9 30 6.0 6.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 120 24.0 24.0 24.0 1-3 sm 2 250 50.0 50.0 74.0 3-5 sm 3 63 12.7 12.7 86.7 5-7 sm 4 23 4.7 4.7 91.4 7-10 5 25 5.1 5.1 96.4 10 + SM 6 18 3.6 3.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 32 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE DEPEN PERSONAS DEPENDEN DE ESTE INGRESO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 16 3.3 3.3 3.3 2 58 11.5 11.5 14.8 3 72 14.4 14.4 29.1 4 100 20.0 20.0 49.1 5 107 21.4 21.4 70.6 6 66 13.1 13.1 83.7 7 36 7.2 7.2 90.8 8 26 5.3 5.3 96.1 9 2 .5 .5 96.6 10 11 2.3 2.3 98.9 11 2 .3 .3 99.2 12 1 .1 .1 99.4 13 1 .1 .1 99.5 14 1 .2 .2 99.7 40 1 .2 .2 99.9 52 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TEL HAY TELEFONO EN SU HOGAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 190 38.0 38.0 38.0 NO 2 308 61.6 61.6 99.6 NC 3 2 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 33 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE AUTO CUANTOS AUTOMOVILES HAY EN SU HOGAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NINGUNO 1 203 40.7 40.7 40.7 UNO 2 182 36.4 36.4 77.1 DOS 3 76 15.2 15.2 92.3 TRES 4 30 5.9 5.9 98.2 CUATRO O MAS 5 7 1.4 1.4 99.6 NC 6 2 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESCUELA VAN A ESCUELAS PUBLICAS O PRIVADAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PUBLICAS 1 280 56.0 56.0 56.0 PRIVADAS 2 16 3.2 3.2 59.2 AMBAS 3 11 2.1 2.1 61.3 NINGUNA ESTUDIA 4 193 38.7 38.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RELIG TIENE USTED ALGUNA RELIGION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 430 86.0 86.0 86.0 NO 2 69 13.8 13.8 99.9 NC 3 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 34 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE RELIG_1 CUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CATOLICA 1 362 72.4 84.2 84.2 2 2 .4 .5 84.6 CRISTIANA 11 5 1.1 1.3 85.9 EVANGELISTA 12 30 6.0 7.0 92.9 TESTIGO DE JEHOVA 13 11 2.3 2.6 95.5 MORMON 17 2 .3 .4 95.9 PROTESTANTE 18 3 .5 .6 96.5 PENTECOSTES 19 13 2.5 2.9 99.4 METODISTA 21 1 .1 .2 99.6 NS 99 2 .4 .4 100.0 0 70 14.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 430 Missing cases 70 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HABITA_1 CUANTAS TIENEN DE 0 A 12 AŅOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 108 21.7 21.7 21.7 2 101 20.1 20.2 41.9 3 43 8.7 8.7 50.6 4 22 4.5 4.5 55.0 5 4 .8 .8 55.9 6 1 .3 .3 56.1 7 1 .2 .2 56.3 19 1 .1 .1 56.5 NINGUNA 96 215 43.1 43.1 99.6 NC 98 2 .4 .4 100.0 0 1 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 499 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 35 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE HABITA_2 CUANTAS TIENEN DE 12 A 18 AŅOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 119 23.9 23.9 23.9 2 57 11.4 11.4 35.3 3 12 2.3 2.3 37.6 4 1 .3 .3 37.9 6 1 .1 .1 38.0 60 1 .1 .1 38.2 NINGUNA 96 302 60.3 60.3 98.5 NC 98 6 1.2 1.2 99.7 NS 99 1 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HABITA_3 CUANTAS TIENEN DE 18 A 64 AŅOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 39 7.7 7.7 7.7 2 228 45.7 45.7 53.4 3 80 16.0 16.0 69.4 4 79 15.7 15.7 85.2 5 33 6.5 6.5 91.7 6 18 3.5 3.5 95.2 7 5 1.1 1.1 96.3 8 4 .7 .7 97.1 9 1 .2 .2 97.2 10 1 .1 .1 97.4 NINGUNA 96 13 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 36 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE HABITA_4 CUANTAS TIENEN MAS DE 64 AŅOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 50 10.0 10.0 10.0 2 16 3.3 3.3 13.3 3 1 .2 .2 13.5 9 1 .1 .1 13.6 29 1 .1 .1 13.7 NINGUNA 96 422 84.4 84.7 98.4 NC 98 7 1.4 1.4 99.8 NS 99 1 .2 .2 100.0 0 2 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 498 Missing cases 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE_1 ELECC PDTE MPAL POR CUAL PARTIDO VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 80 15.9 15.9 15.9 PRI 2 119 23.7 23.8 39.7 PRD 4 97 19.4 19.4 59.2 PFCRN 5 27 5.5 5.5 64.7 PARM 6 1 .3 .3 65.0 OTRO 10 2 .3 .3 65.3 NINGUNO 11 33 6.6 6.7 71.9 NS 12 96 19.2 19.3 91.2 BLANCO 13 35 7.0 7.1 98.3 NULO 14 9 1.7 1.7 100.0 . 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 499 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 37 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE PELE_2 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 64 12.8 12.8 12.8 PRI 2 119 23.7 23.7 36.5 PRD 4 125 25.0 25.0 61.6 PFCRN 5 23 4.5 4.6 66.1 PARM 6 1 .2 .2 66.3 PDM 7 1 .3 .3 66.6 OTRO 10 1 .1 .1 66.7 NINGUNO 11 36 7.3 7.3 74.0 NS 12 89 17.9 17.9 91.9 BLANCO 13 31 6.3 6.3 98.1 NULO 14 9 1.9 1.9 100.0 . 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 499 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 38 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE This procedure was completed at 23:20:36 The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 499 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 6253 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 781 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE_1 ELECC PDTE MPAL POR CUAL PARTIDO VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 80 15.9 24.4 24.4 PRI 2 119 23.7 36.4 60.9 PRD 4 97 19.4 29.8 90.7 OTRO 10 30 6.1 9.3 100.0 0 174 34.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 326 Missing cases 174 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE_2 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 64 12.8 19.2 19.2 PRI 2 119 23.7 35.6 54.8 PRD 4 125 25.0 37.6 92.4 OTRO 10 25 5.1 7.6 100.0 0 167 33.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 333 Missing cases 167 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 39 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE P12A1 SI, QUIEN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 500 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P12A2 QUE OPINION TIENE UD DE EL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 500 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 40 PRE-ELECTORAL RIO BRAVO, TAM (MPAL) OCT/ 1995 11/2/95 FRECUENCIAS RIO BRAVO, TAM PONDERADAS EN RIOBRAVO.FRE This procedure was completed at 23:20:38