The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 298 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 7289 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 911 Value Labels for each Variable. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATH Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CAM10297 300 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESTADO ESTADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CAMPECHE 4 300 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MUN MUNICIPIO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CANDELARIA 10 300 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST ESTRATO ESTRATO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MARG. MUY ALTA 4 76 25.3 25.3 25.3 MARG. RURAL 7 224 74.7 74.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SITEDO SITUACION ACTUAL DE CAMPECHE...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 48 16.1 16.1 16.1 IGUAL DE BIEN 2 9 3.1 3.1 19.2 IGUAL DE MAL 3 47 15.6 15.6 34.7 PEOR 4 149 49.5 49.5 84.3 NS 5 40 13.3 13.3 97.5 NC 6 7 2.5 2.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXEDO SITUACION DEL ESTADO PROXIMO AÑO? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 83 27.8 27.8 27.8 IGUAL DE BIEN 2 8 2.6 2.6 30.4 IGUAL DE MAL 3 17 5.6 5.6 36.0 PEOR 4 96 32.1 32.1 68.1 NS 5 85 28.2 28.2 96.3 NC 6 11 3.7 3.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST NUMMEJ CON LO HECHO PDTE MPAL, HA MEJORADO? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent HA MEJORADO 1 120 40.0 40.0 40.0 NO HA CAMBIADO 2 96 32.1 32.1 72.2 HA EMPEORADO 3 54 17.9 17.9 90.1 NS 4 26 8.7 8.7 98.8 NC 5 4 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 QUE SE ACERCA MAS A LO QUE UD PIENSA? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SIEMPRE VOTA X MISMO 1 200 66.6 66.6 66.6 AVECES VOTA X UN PAR 2 35 11.8 11.8 78.4 NINGUNA DE LAS DOS 3 47 15.6 15.6 94.0 NS 4 4 1.2 1.2 95.2 NC 5 14 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCAN1 HA OIDO HABLAR DE..ROBERTO CRUZ SAN MIGU Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 128 42.7 42.7 42.7 NC 2 1 .3 .3 43.0 SI 3 171 57.0 57.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST CONRCAN2 HA OIDO HABLAR DE..RODOLFO CAMBRANIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 149 49.6 49.6 49.6 NC 2 1 .3 .3 50.0 SI 3 150 50.0 50.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCAN3 HA OIDO HABLAR DE..ROBUSTIANO VILLALOBOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 218 72.7 72.7 72.7 NC 2 2 .6 .6 73.3 SI 3 80 26.7 26.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCAN4 HA OIDO HABLAR DE..PEDRO KURI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 201 66.8 66.8 66.8 NC 2 1 .3 .3 67.2 SI 3 98 32.8 32.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST CONRCAN5 HA OIDO HABLAR DE..ANTONIO PIEDRA CASTRO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 232 77.3 77.3 77.3 NC 2 2 .6 .6 77.9 SI 3 66 22.1 22.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCAN6 HA OIDO HABLAR DE..MARIO PEREZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 186 62.0 62.0 62.0 NC 2 1 .3 .3 62.4 SI 3 113 37.6 37.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI_1 QUE OPINION TIENE DE ROBERTO CRUZ SAN MI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 78 26.0 45.7 45.7 REGULAR 2 31 10.2 18.0 63.6 MALA 3 20 6.8 11.9 75.5 NS/NC 4 42 13.9 24.5 100.0 0 129 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 171 Missing cases 129 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST CANOPI_2 QUE OPINION TIENE DE RODOLFO CAMBRANIS? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 69 22.9 45.9 45.9 REGULAR 2 37 12.3 24.5 70.3 MALA 3 12 3.9 7.9 78.2 NS/NC 4 33 10.9 21.8 100.0 0 150 50.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 150 Missing cases 150 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI_3 QUE OPINION TIENE DE ROBUSTIANO VILLALOB Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 26 8.6 32.0 32.0 REGULAR 2 17 5.7 21.4 53.4 MALA 3 19 6.3 23.5 76.9 NS/NC 4 19 6.2 23.1 100.0 0 220 73.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 80 Missing cases 220 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI_4 QUE OPINION TIENE DE PEDRO KURI? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 21 7.0 21.5 21.5 REGULAR 2 24 8.1 24.6 46.1 MALA 3 23 7.7 23.5 69.6 NS/NC 4 30 10.0 30.4 100.0 0 202 67.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 98 Missing cases 202 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST CANOPI_5 QUE OPINION TIENE DE ANTONIO PIEDRA CAST Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 17 5.6 25.2 25.2 REGULAR 2 24 8.1 36.8 61.9 MALA 3 12 3.9 17.8 79.7 NS/NC 4 13 4.5 20.3 100.0 0 234 77.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 66 Missing cases 234 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI_6 QUE OPINION TIENE DE MARIO PEREZ? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 15 4.8 12.8 12.8 REGULAR 2 16 5.3 14.1 26.9 MALA 3 69 23.0 61.1 88.0 NS/NC 4 13 4.5 12.0 100.0 0 187 62.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 113 Missing cases 187 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXPCAM QUE ES MAS IMPORTANTE EN PROX PDTE MPAL? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXPER PARA GOBERNAR 1 143 47.7 47.7 47.7 OPCION DE CAMBIO 2 87 29.1 29.1 76.7 NINGUNA 3 14 4.5 4.5 81.3 NS 4 39 12.9 12.9 94.2 NC 5 18 5.8 5.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P8 ¿HA IODO DE POSIBLE CANDIDATO DEL PAN..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 11 3.5 3.5 3.5 NO 2 288 95.8 95.8 99.4 NC 3 2 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8_1 ¿QUIEN...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NC 98 2 .7 18.8 18.8 NS 99 9 2.9 81.2 100.0 0 289 96.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 11 Missing cases 289 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9 ¿HA IODO DE POSIBLE CANDIDATO DEL PRD..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 28 9.2 9.2 9.2 NO 2 265 88.2 88.2 97.4 NC 3 8 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P9_1 ¿QUIEN...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GILBERTO MENDEZ 11 1 .4 4.7 4.7 VALLADARES 12 1 .3 3.8 8.5 LAYDA SANSORES 13 1 .3 3.5 12.0 INSUF ESPECIF 97 2 .6 6.9 18.9 NC 98 10 3.5 37.8 56.7 NS 99 12 4.0 43.3 100.0 0 272 90.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 28 Missing cases 272 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANPAR QUE ES MAS IMPORTANTE AL VOTAR..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CANDIDATO 1 116 38.6 38.6 38.6 PARTIDO 2 119 39.6 39.6 78.1 NS 3 37 12.4 12.4 90.5 NC 4 28 9.5 9.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P11 DE CANDIDATOS DEL PRI A QUIEN PREFIERE.. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ROBERTO CRUZ SAN MIG 1 62 20.6 20.6 20.6 RODOLFO CAMBRANIS 2 45 15.1 15.1 35.7 ROBUSTIANO VILLALOBO 3 5 1.7 1.7 37.4 PEDRO KURI 4 11 3.8 3.8 41.2 ANTONIO PIEDRA CASTR 5 6 1.9 1.9 43.1 MARIO PEREZ 6 5 1.6 1.6 44.8 NO LOS CONOCE SUFICI 7 84 27.9 27.9 72.7 NINGUNO 8 30 10.1 10.1 82.8 NS 9 41 13.5 13.5 96.3 NC 10 11 3.7 3.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P12 NUENO, ¿POR CUAL DE ELLOS SE INCLINARIA. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ROBERTO CRUZ SAN MIG 1 2 .5 1.9 1.9 RODOLFO CAMBRANIS 2 2 .7 2.3 4.2 ROBUSTIANO VILLALOBO 3 1 .2 .8 5.1 ANTONIO PIEDRA CASTR 5 1 .4 1.3 6.4 MARIO PEREZ 6 1 .3 1.2 7.5 NS 7 60 20.2 72.2 79.8 NC 8 17 5.6 20.2 100.0 0 216 72.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 84 Missing cases 216 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST ACUMUN ACUERDO CON EL PDTE MUNICIPAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 113 37.5 37.5 37.5 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 26 8.5 8.5 46.1 DESACUERDO EN PARTE 3 21 7.0 7.0 53.1 DESACUERDO 4 78 26.0 26.0 79.1 NS 5 48 16.1 16.1 95.1 NC 6 15 4.9 4.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_1 VOTOS POR...PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 281 93.6 93.6 93.6 UNO 1 5 1.8 1.8 95.3 DOS 2 1 .3 .3 95.6 TRES 3 3 1.0 1.0 96.6 CINCO 5 10 3.4 3.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_2 VOTOS POR...PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 130 43.4 43.4 43.4 UNO 1 4 1.4 1.4 44.8 DOS 2 2 .8 .8 45.6 TRES 3 5 1.7 1.7 47.3 CUATRO 4 4 1.3 1.3 48.6 CINCO 5 154 51.4 51.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST PVOT_3 VOTOS POR...PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 268 89.4 89.4 89.4 UNO 1 7 2.5 2.5 91.8 DOS 2 2 .6 .6 92.4 CUATRO 4 2 .6 .6 93.0 CINCO 5 21 7.0 7.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_4 VOTOS POR...PT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 295 98.4 98.4 98.4 UNO 1 4 1.4 1.4 99.8 CINCO 5 1 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_5 VOTOS POR...PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 297 99.2 99.2 99.2 UNO 1 3 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST PVOT_6 VOTOS POR...OTRO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 297 98.9 98.9 98.9 DOS 2 2 .8 .8 99.7 CINCO 5 1 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_7 VOTOS POR...ABSTENCION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 276 92.1 92.1 92.1 UNO 1 1 .4 .4 92.5 CINCO 5 23 7.5 7.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_8 VOTOS POR...NS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 246 82.0 82.0 82.0 CINCO 5 54 18.0 18.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST PVOT_9 VOTOS POR...NC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 281 93.6 93.6 93.6 CINCO 5 19 6.4 6.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PREOGOB CUAL SE ACERCA MAS A LO QUE PIENSA... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent A GOB LE IMPORTA GEN 1 92 30.6 30.6 30.6 A GOB NO LE IMPORTA 2 171 56.8 56.8 87.5 NINGUNA 3 5 1.5 1.5 89.0 NS 4 26 8.7 8.7 97.7 NC 5 7 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P17 OIDO HABLAR POSIBLE CANDIDATO PAN DIP.FE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 7 2.4 2.4 2.4 NO 2 291 97.0 97.0 99.4 NC 3 2 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P17_1 SI ¿QUIEN? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NC 98 2 .6 24.7 24.7 NS 99 6 1.8 75.3 100.0 0 293 97.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 7 Missing cases 293 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P18 OIDO HABLAR POSIBLE CANDIDATO PRD DIP.FE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 13 4.4 4.4 4.4 NO 2 284 94.6 94.6 99.0 NC 3 3 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P18_1 SI ¿QUIEN? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LAYDA SANSORES 11 1 .4 8.3 8.3 GILBERTO 12 1 .3 7.5 15.8 NC 98 3 1.0 23.3 39.1 NS 99 8 2.7 60.9 100.0 0 287 95.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 13 Missing cases 287 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST PACU ACUERDO CON PDTE ZEDILLO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 155 51.7 51.7 51.7 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 40 13.2 13.2 65.0 DESACUERDO EN PARTE 3 6 2.0 2.0 67.0 DESACUERDO 4 57 19.0 19.0 86.0 NS 5 32 10.7 10.7 96.7 NC 6 10 3.3 3.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA21 OIDO HABLAR DE: FERNADO RAFFUL MIGUEL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 252 84.0 84.0 84.0 SI 3 48 16.0 16.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA22 OIDO HABLAR DE: GUADALUPE FONS SAENZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 273 90.8 90.8 90.8 SI 3 27 9.2 9.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST CONRCA23 OIDO HABLAR DE: EDUARDO REYES SANCHEZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 285 95.0 95.0 95.0 SI 3 15 5.0 5.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA24 OIDO HABLAR DE: ARACELY ESCALANTE JASSO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 277 92.4 92.4 92.4 NC 2 1 .3 .3 92.7 SI 3 22 7.3 7.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA25 OIDO HABLAR DE: MANUEL RIVAS BATISTA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 287 95.7 95.7 95.7 SI 3 13 4.3 4.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST CANOPI21 OPINION DE: FERNADO RAFFUL MIGUEL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 14 4.7 29.5 29.5 REGULAR 2 9 3.1 19.2 48.8 MALA 3 4 1.4 8.5 57.3 NS/NC 4 20 6.8 42.7 100.0 0 252 84.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 48 Missing cases 252 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI22 OPINION DE: GUADALUPE FONS SAENZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 17 5.5 60.6 60.6 REGULAR 2 2 .6 6.4 67.0 MALA 3 1 .3 3.2 70.2 NS/NC 4 8 2.7 29.8 100.0 0 273 90.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 27 Missing cases 273 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI23 OPINION DE: EDUARDO REYES SANCHEZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 5 1.7 34.7 34.7 REGULAR 2 2 .7 13.1 47.9 MALA 3 2 .6 12.8 60.7 NS/NC 4 6 2.0 39.3 100.0 0 285 95.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 15 Missing cases 285 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST CANOPI24 OPINION DE: ARACELY ESCALANTE JASSO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 10 3.3 45.6 45.6 REGULAR 2 5 1.7 24.0 69.6 MALA 3 1 .2 3.0 72.6 NS/NC 4 6 2.0 27.4 100.0 0 278 92.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 22 Missing cases 278 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI25 OPINION DE: MANUEL RIVAS BATISTA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 4 1.2 27.9 27.9 REGULAR 2 4 1.2 28.9 56.8 NS/NC 4 6 1.9 43.2 100.0 0 287 95.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 13 Missing cases 287 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MALVSRIE EN POLITICA QUE PREFIERE USTED... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAS VALE MALO X CONO 1 83 27.8 27.8 27.8 EL QUE NO ARRIESGA N 2 119 39.5 39.5 67.3 NINGUNA DE LAS ANTER 3 16 5.4 5.4 72.6 NS 4 34 11.3 11.3 84.0 NC 5 48 16.0 16.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST CONRCA41 OIDO HABLAR DE: DULCE CERVERA CETINA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 285 95.1 95.1 95.1 NC 2 2 .7 .7 95.8 SI 3 13 4.2 4.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA42 OIDO HABLAR DE: JOSE IGNACIO SEARA SIERR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 291 97.1 97.1 97.1 NC 2 3 1.0 1.0 98.1 SI 3 6 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA43 OIDO HABLAR DE: LUIS ROBERTO SILVA PEREZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 262 87.3 87.3 87.3 NC 2 3 1.0 1.0 88.3 SI 3 35 11.7 11.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST CONRCA44 OIDO HABLAR DE: JOSE JABER RAFFUL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 252 84.0 84.0 84.0 NC 2 2 .5 .5 84.5 SI 3 47 15.5 15.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA45 OIDO HABLAR DE: RICARDO OCAMPO FERNANDEZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 257 85.6 85.6 85.6 NC 2 1 .3 .3 85.9 SI 3 42 14.1 14.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONRCA46 OIDO HABLAR DE: DAVID RAZU VERA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 286 95.3 95.3 95.3 NC 2 2 .6 .6 96.0 SI 3 12 4.0 4.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 32 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST CANOPI41 OPINION DE: DULCE CERVERA CETINA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 6 2.0 46.9 46.9 REGULAR 2 2 .7 17.1 64.0 MALA 3 1 .5 10.8 74.9 NS/NC 4 3 1.1 25.1 100.0 0 287 95.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 13 Missing cases 287 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI42 OPINION DE: JOSE IGNACIO SEARA SIERRA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 3 .9 46.4 46.4 REGULAR 2 1 .4 18.8 65.2 NS/NC 4 2 .7 34.8 100.0 0 294 98.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6 Missing cases 294 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI43 OPINION DE: LUIS ROBERTO SILVA PEREZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 12 4.0 34.4 34.4 REGULAR 2 12 4.1 35.1 69.4 MALA 3 4 1.2 10.6 80.0 NS/NC 4 7 2.3 20.0 100.0 0 265 88.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 35 Missing cases 265 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 33 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST CANOPI44 OPINION DE: JOSE JABER RAFFUL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 15 4.9 31.9 31.9 REGULAR 2 14 4.8 30.6 62.5 MALA 3 7 2.3 15.0 77.5 NS/NC 4 10 3.5 22.5 100.0 0 253 84.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 47 Missing cases 253 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI45 OPINION DE: RICARDO OCAMPO FERNANDEZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 18 6.0 42.7 42.7 REGULAR 2 13 4.4 31.5 74.2 MALA 3 3 .8 6.0 80.2 NS/NC 4 8 2.8 19.8 100.0 0 258 85.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 42 Missing cases 258 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANOPI46 OPINION DE: DAVID RAZU VERA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 3 1.1 28.2 28.2 REGULAR 2 3 1.1 27.7 55.9 MALA 3 1 .2 5.0 60.8 NS/NC 4 5 1.6 39.2 100.0 0 288 96.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 12 Missing cases 288 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 34 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P23 CANDIDATOS PRI DIP.FED ¿A QUIEN PREFERIR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FERNANDO RAFFUL MIGU 1 15 5.0 5.0 5.0 LUIS ROBERTO SILVA P 2 7 2.3 2.3 7.4 JOSE JABER RAFFUL 3 5 1.6 1.6 9.0 GUADALUPE FONS SAENZ 4 8 2.7 2.7 11.7 EDUARDO REYES SANCHE 5 3 1.0 1.0 12.7 RICARDO OCAMPO FERNA 6 9 2.9 2.9 15.6 ARACELY ESCALANTE JA 7 3 .9 .9 16.5 DAVID RAZU VERA 8 2 .6 .6 17.1 DULCE CERVERA CETINA 10 3 1.0 1.0 18.1 NO LOS CONOCE SUFICI 12 103 34.4 34.4 52.6 NINGUNO 13 47 15.8 15.8 68.3 NS 14 69 22.9 22.9 91.2 NC 15 26 8.8 8.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P24 POR CUAL DE ELLOS SE INCLINARIA MAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LUIS ROBERTO SILVA P 2 1 .3 .8 .8 JOSE JABER RAFFUL 3 1 .4 1.1 1.9 GUADALUPE FONS SAENZ 4 2 .6 1.8 3.7 RICARDO OCAMPO FERNA 6 2 .6 1.8 5.5 DAVID RAZU VERA 8 1 .2 .7 6.2 NS 12 69 23.0 66.8 73.0 NC 13 28 9.3 27.0 100.0 0 197 65.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 103 Missing cases 197 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 35 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST ACUGOB ACUERDO CON GOBERNADOR JORGE SALOMON AZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 91 30.3 30.3 30.3 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 29 9.5 9.5 39.8 DESACUERDO EN PARTE 3 11 3.7 3.7 43.5 DESACUERDO 4 108 36.1 36.1 79.6 NS 5 49 16.3 16.3 95.9 NC 6 12 4.1 4.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE SI HOY ELEC GOB ¿POR CUAL VOTARIA? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 5 1.6 1.6 1.6 PRI 2 169 56.3 56.3 58.0 PRD 4 19 6.3 6.3 64.3 PT 8 2 .6 .6 64.9 NINGUNO 11 14 4.8 4.8 69.7 NO IRIA A VOTAR 95 10 3.3 3.3 73.0 DEPENDE DE CANDIDATO 96 24 7.9 7.9 80.9 NC 98 14 4.8 4.8 85.7 NS 99 43 14.3 14.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 36 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST PELE_1 INDEPENDIENTEMENTE DE CANDIDATOS ¿X CUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PRI 2 11 3.5 44.6 44.6 PRD 4 3 1.1 13.4 58.0 OTRO 10 1 .3 4.4 62.3 NINGUNO 11 4 1.5 18.8 81.1 NC 98 2 .6 7.6 88.7 NS 99 3 .9 11.3 100.0 0 276 92.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 24 Missing cases 276 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IDPAR NORMALMENTE USTED SE CONSIDERA... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PRIISTA 1 196 65.5 65.5 65.5 PANISTA 2 4 1.4 1.4 66.9 PERREDISTA 3 17 5.6 5.6 72.5 NO IDENTIFICA NINGUN 4 56 18.7 18.7 91.2 OTRO 5 4 1.3 1.3 92.6 NC 6 22 7.4 7.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 150 49.9 49.9 49.9 femenino 2 150 50.1 50.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 37 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 87 28.9 28.9 28.9 26-40 2 112 37.4 37.4 66.3 41-60 3 71 23.6 23.6 90.0 61 + 4 29 9.7 9.7 99.6 Nc 99 1 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESCOL Escolaridad entrevistado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 57 19.1 19.1 19.1 prim inc 2 96 32.0 32.0 51.1 prim comp 3 63 21.0 21.0 72.0 sec incomp 4 16 5.2 5.2 77.2 sec completa 5 31 10.3 10.3 87.6 Prepa incompleta 6 15 5.1 5.1 92.7 Prepa completa 7 13 4.2 4.2 96.9 Universidad incomple 8 4 1.4 1.4 98.3 Universidad Completa 9 5 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 38 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST ESCOL_1 Que carrera o estudios hizo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LIC CONTADURIA 60 1 .3 10.6 10.6 LIC PSICOLOGIA 63 1 .3 9.4 20.0 LIC IDIOMAS 91 1 .2 7.8 27.8 LIC EN EDUCACION 96 6 2.0 65.2 93.0 NC 998 1 .2 7.0 100.0 0 291 96.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 9 Missing cases 291 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE4 Actividad la semana pasada... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Trabajó 1 140 46.7 46.7 46.7 Vacaciones (incap) 2 2 .5 .5 47.2 Ama de casa 3 120 39.9 39.9 87.1 Estudiante 4 22 7.2 7.2 94.3 Jubilado/Pensionado 5 3 .9 .9 95.2 Desempleado 6 11 3.8 3.8 99.0 Incapacitado Permane 7 2 .7 .7 99.7 Nc 98 1 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 39 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST INGRE Rango ingreso familiar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 158 52.5 52.5 52.5 1-3 sm 2 111 37.0 37.0 89.6 3-5 sm 3 21 7.1 7.1 96.6 5-7 sm 4 3 .9 .9 97.5 7-10 5 1 .3 .3 97.8 10-30 SM 6 1 .3 .3 98.1 Ns/Nc 8 6 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELEA PARA PDTE MUNICIPAL, POR QUIEN VOTARIA.. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 11 3.8 3.8 3.8 PRI 2 176 58.5 58.5 62.3 PRD 4 26 8.6 8.6 70.9 PT 8 1 .2 .2 71.1 NINGUNO 11 24 7.9 7.9 79.0 NS 12 41 13.8 13.8 92.9 NC-BLANCO 13 21 7.1 7.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 40 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST PELEB PARA DIPUTADO FEDERAL, POR QUIEN VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 11 3.7 3.7 3.7 PRI 2 173 57.8 57.8 61.5 PRD 4 24 8.0 8.0 69.5 PT 8 1 .2 .2 69.7 OTRO 10 2 .6 .6 70.3 NINGUNO 11 25 8.5 8.5 78.8 NS 12 38 12.8 12.8 91.6 NC-BLANCO 13 24 8.0 8.0 99.6 ANULADO 14 1 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 41 PRE ELECTORAL CANDELARIA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/13/97 FRECUENCIAS CANDELARIA PONDERADA (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST This procedure was completed at 11:14:52 End of Include file.