The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 300 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 7289 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 911 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATH Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CAM10297 300 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESTADO ESTADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CAMPECHE 4 300 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MUN MUNICIPIO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ESCARCEGA 9 300 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST ESTRATO ESTRATO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MARG. ALTA 3 43 14.3 14.3 14.3 MARG. MUY ALTA 4 126 41.9 41.9 56.2 MARG. RURAL 7 132 43.8 43.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SITEDO SITUACION ACTUAL DEL ESTADO DE CAMPECHE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 36 11.9 11.9 11.9 IGUAL DE BIEN 2 13 4.3 4.3 16.3 IGUAL DE MAL 3 66 21.8 21.8 38.1 PEOR 4 175 58.3 58.3 96.4 NS 5 8 2.8 2.8 99.1 NC 6 3 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 żY COMO SERA SITUACION ESTADO PROX AŃO.. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 46 15.5 15.5 15.5 IGUAL DE BIEN 2 10 3.4 3.4 18.9 IGUAL DE MAL 3 52 17.4 17.4 36.3 PEOR 4 121 40.4 40.4 76.7 NS 5 69 22.9 22.9 99.6 NC 6 1 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P4 SU MUNICIPIO HA MEJORADO, CON PDTE MPAL. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent HA MEJORADO 1 176 58.6 58.6 58.6 NO HA CAMBIADO 2 91 30.2 30.2 88.8 HA EMPEORADO 3 28 9.2 9.2 98.0 NS 4 4 1.4 1.4 99.4 NC 5 2 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 QUE SE ACERCA A LO QUE USTED PIENSA..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VOTA POR EL MISMO 1 216 71.9 71.9 71.9 A VECES POR UNO U OT 2 37 12.3 12.3 84.2 NINGUNA DE LAS DOS 3 43 14.2 14.2 98.4 NS 4 4 1.3 1.3 99.7 NC 5 1 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6_1 HA OIDO DE...ROSAURA GLEZ CASTILLO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 136 45.5 45.5 45.5 SI 3 164 54.5 54.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P6_2 HA OIDO DE...DOMINGO MORTERA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 265 88.4 88.4 88.4 NC 2 3 .9 .9 89.2 SI 3 32 10.8 10.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6_3 HA OIDO DE...EVANGELINA ZAPATA DIETRICH Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 193 64.4 64.4 64.4 NC 2 3 1.0 1.0 65.4 SI 3 104 34.6 34.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6_4 HA OIDO DE...LUIS CARRILLO ORTEGON Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 199 66.2 66.2 66.2 NC 2 3 .9 .9 67.1 SI 3 99 32.9 32.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P6_5 HA OIDO DE...RIGOBERTO CAMBRANIS GLEZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 81 26.9 26.9 26.9 NC 2 2 .7 .7 27.6 SI 3 217 72.4 72.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6A_1 żY QUE OPINION TIENE DE EL (ELLA)..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 52 17.2 31.6 31.6 REGULAR 2 57 19.1 35.0 66.6 MALA 3 8 2.5 4.6 71.2 NS/NC 4 47 15.7 28.8 100.0 0 136 45.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 164 Missing cases 136 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6A_2 żY QUE OPINION TIENE DE EL (ELLA)..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 15 5.1 47.3 47.3 REGULAR 2 8 2.7 25.5 72.8 MALA 3 3 1.1 10.5 83.3 NS/NC 4 5 1.8 16.7 100.0 0 268 89.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 32 Missing cases 268 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P6A_3 żY QUE OPINION TIENE DE EL (ELLA)..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 30 9.9 28.5 28.5 REGULAR 2 42 14.1 40.8 69.3 MALA 3 14 4.6 13.3 82.6 NS/NC 4 18 6.0 17.4 100.0 0 196 65.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 104 Missing cases 196 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6A_4 żY QUE OPINION TIENE DE EL (ELLA)..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 35 11.6 35.2 35.2 REGULAR 2 32 10.7 32.4 67.6 MALA 3 9 3.2 9.6 77.1 NS/NC 4 23 7.5 22.9 100.0 0 201 67.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 99 Missing cases 201 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6A_5 żY QUE OPINION TIENE DE EL (ELLA)..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 131 43.7 60.4 60.4 REGULAR 2 57 19.1 26.4 86.8 MALA 3 10 3.2 4.4 91.2 NS/NC 4 19 6.4 8.8 100.0 0 83 27.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 217 Missing cases 83 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P7 QUE ES MAS IMPORTANTE EN PROX PDTE MPAL? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXPERIENCIA GOBERNAR 1 168 55.9 55.9 55.9 OPCION DE CAMBIO 2 102 33.9 33.9 89.8 NINGUNA 3 12 4.2 4.2 93.9 NS 4 17 5.5 5.5 99.5 NC 5 2 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8_1 HA OIDO DE...FRANCISCO LUNA ACOSTA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 255 84.9 84.9 84.9 SI 3 45 15.1 15.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8_2 HA OIDO DE...SILVESTRE MENDOZA GARCIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 173 57.8 57.8 57.8 NC 2 1 .3 .3 58.1 SI 3 126 41.9 41.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P8_3 HA OIDO DE...YANAURIO GARCIA CAMBRANIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 135 45.1 45.1 45.1 NC 2 1 .3 .3 45.4 SI 3 164 54.6 54.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8_4 HA OIDO DE...EDUALDO ESPINOZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 265 88.5 88.5 88.5 NC 2 4 1.3 1.3 89.8 SI 3 31 10.2 10.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8A_1 żY QUE OPINION TIENE DE EL (ELLA)..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 11 3.6 23.9 23.9 REGULAR 2 17 5.8 38.5 62.5 MALA 3 8 2.8 18.7 81.2 NS/NC 4 9 2.8 18.8 100.0 0 255 84.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 45 Missing cases 255 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P8A_2 żY QUE OPINION TIENE DE EL (ELLA)..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 41 13.6 32.5 32.5 REGULAR 2 50 16.7 40.0 72.5 MALA 3 10 3.4 8.2 80.6 NS/NC 4 24 8.1 19.4 100.0 0 174 58.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 126 Missing cases 174 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8A_3 żY QUE OPINION TIENE DE EL (ELLA)..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 49 16.3 29.8 29.8 REGULAR 2 59 19.8 36.3 66.1 MALA 3 28 9.2 16.9 83.0 NS/NC 4 28 9.3 17.0 100.0 0 136 45.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 164 Missing cases 136 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8A_4 żY QUE OPINION TIENE DE EL (ELLA)..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 9 3.1 30.8 30.8 REGULAR 2 16 5.4 52.9 83.6 MALA 3 1 .2 2.4 86.1 NS/NC 4 4 1.4 13.9 100.0 0 269 89.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 31 Missing cases 269 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P9 DE CANDIDATOS DEL PRD A QUIEN PREFERIRIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ROSAURA GLEZ CASTILL 1 43 14.3 14.3 14.3 EVANGELINA ZAPATA D. 2 14 4.7 4.7 19.1 FRANCISCO LUNA ACOST 3 6 2.0 2.0 21.1 SILVESTRE MENDOZA GA 4 34 11.5 11.5 32.6 NO LO CONOCE SUFICIE 5 83 27.8 27.8 60.4 NINGUNO 6 94 31.2 31.2 91.6 NS 7 22 7.3 7.3 98.8 NC 8 4 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P10 QUE ES MAS IMPORTANTE AL VOTAR..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CANDIDATO 1 155 51.6 51.6 51.6 PARTIDO 2 107 35.7 35.7 87.3 NS 3 23 7.8 7.8 95.1 NC 4 15 4.9 4.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P11 DE CANDIDATOS DEL PRI A QUIEN PREFERIRIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LUIS CARRILLO ORTEGO 1 17 5.5 5.5 5.5 RIGOBERTO CAMBRANIS 2 115 38.2 38.2 43.7 YANAURIO GARCIA C 3 42 14.0 14.0 57.7 EDUALDO ESPENOZA 4 5 1.5 1.5 59.3 DOMINGO MORTERA 5 1 .4 .4 59.7 NO CONOCE SUFICIENTE 6 52 17.4 17.4 77.2 NINGUNO 7 37 12.3 12.3 89.4 NS 8 27 9.1 9.1 98.6 NC 9 4 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P12 BUENO, POR CUAL SE INCLINARIA MAS...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LUIS CARRILLO RTEGON 1 1 .3 1.4 1.4 RIGOBERTO CAMBRANIS 2 4 1.5 8.4 9.8 YANAURIO GARCIA 3 4 1.4 7.8 17.6 EDUALDO ESPINOZA 4 2 .8 4.4 22.0 DOMINGO MORTERA 5 1 .4 2.5 24.5 NS 6 34 11.4 65.6 90.2 NC 7 5 1.7 9.8 100.0 0 248 82.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 52 Missing cases 248 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P13 ACUERDO CON GOBNO DEL PDTE MUNICIPAL..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 165 55.0 56.1 56.1 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 40 13.4 13.7 69.8 DESACUERDO PARTE 3 19 6.5 6.6 76.5 DESACUERDO 4 55 18.5 18.9 95.3 NS 5 10 3.5 3.5 98.9 NC 6 3 1.1 1.1 100.0 0 6 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 294 Missing cases 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P14_1 VOTOS... PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 288 96.0 96.0 96.0 UNO 1 2 .7 .7 96.7 DOS 2 2 .6 .6 97.3 TRES 3 1 .4 .4 97.7 CINCO 5 7 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P14_2 VOTOS... PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 127 42.5 42.5 42.5 DOS 2 8 2.8 2.8 45.3 TRES 3 3 1.0 1.0 46.3 CUATRO 4 1 .3 .3 46.5 CINCO 5 160 53.5 53.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P14_3 VOTOS... PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 255 85.1 85.1 85.1 UNO 1 3 1.1 1.1 86.2 DOS 2 7 2.3 2.3 88.5 TRES 3 3 1.1 1.1 89.6 CUATRO 4 1 .4 .4 90.0 CINCO 5 30 10.0 10.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P14_4 VOTOS... PT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 299 99.7 99.7 99.7 UNO 1 1 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P14_5 VOTOS... PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 300 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P14_6 VOTOS... OTRO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 297 98.9 98.9 98.9 UNO 1 1 .4 .4 99.2 CINCO 5 2 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P14_7 VOTOS... ABSTENCION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 256 85.4 85.4 85.4 UNO 1 1 .4 .4 85.8 CINCO 5 43 14.2 14.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P14_8 VOTOS... NS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 262 87.4 87.4 87.4 CINCO 5 38 12.6 12.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P14_9 VOTOS... NC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 295 98.2 98.2 98.2 CINCO 5 5 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P15 QUE SE ACERCA MAS A COMO UD PIENSA..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GOBNO LE IMPORTA GEN 1 58 19.5 19.5 19.5 GOBNO NO LE IMPORTA 2 214 71.5 71.7 91.2 NINGUNA 3 10 3.2 3.2 94.4 NS 4 14 4.6 4.6 99.0 NC 5 3 1.0 1.0 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 299 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P17 HA OIDO DE CANDIDATO DE PRD A DIPUTADO? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 42 13.9 13.9 13.9 NO 2 257 85.8 85.8 99.7 NC 3 1 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P17A żQUIEN...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LAIDA SANSORES 11 11 3.6 26.1 26.1 EVANGELINA ZAPATA 12 2 .8 5.7 31.7 SILVESTRE MENDOZA 13 4 1.2 8.5 40.2 ROSAURA GONZALEZ CAS 14 2 .5 3.6 43.9 CUAUHTEMOS CARDENAS 15 2 .7 5.2 49.1 GUILLERMO DEL RIO 16 2 .6 4.7 53.8 33 1 .3 2.0 55.8 INSUFICIENTE ESPECIF 97 1 .4 3.1 58.9 NS 98 4 1.5 10.6 69.5 NC 99 13 4.2 30.5 100.0 0 258 86.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 42 Missing cases 258 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P18 ACUERDO CON EL GOBNO DEL PDTE ZEDILLO..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 149 49.7 49.7 49.7 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 46 15.3 15.3 65.0 DESACUERDO PARTE 3 25 8.4 8.4 73.4 DESACUERDO 4 62 20.7 20.7 94.1 NS 5 10 3.5 3.5 97.6 NC 6 7 2.4 2.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P19_1 HA OIDO DE...FERNANDO RAFFUL MIGUEL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 275 91.8 91.8 91.8 SI 3 25 8.2 8.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P19_2 HA OIDO DE...GUADALUPE FONS SAENZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 285 95.0 95.0 95.0 NC 2 1 .3 .3 95.2 SI 3 14 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P19_3 HA OIDO DE...EDUARDO REYES SANCHEZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 297 99.1 99.1 99.1 SI 3 3 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P19_4 HA OIDO DE...ARACELY ESCALANTE JASSO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 285 95.1 95.1 95.1 SI 3 15 4.9 4.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P19_5 HA OIDO DE...MANUEL RIVAS BATISTA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 295 98.2 98.2 98.2 NC 2 2 .5 .5 98.7 SI 3 4 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P19A_1 żY QUE OPINION TIENE DE EL (ELLA)..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 6 1.9 23.3 23.3 REGULAR 2 5 1.8 22.3 45.7 MALA 3 3 1.1 13.1 58.8 NS/NC 4 10 3.4 41.2 100.0 0 275 91.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 25 Missing cases 275 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P19A_2 żY QUE OPINION TIENE DE EL (ELLA)..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 3 1.0 21.6 21.6 REGULAR 2 4 1.4 29.2 50.9 MALA 3 1 .3 6.3 57.2 NS/NC 4 6 2.0 42.8 100.0 0 286 95.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 14 Missing cases 286 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P19A_3 żY QUE OPINION TIENE DE EL (ELLA)..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent REGULAR 2 1 .3 32.1 32.1 NS/NC 4 2 .6 67.9 100.0 0 297 99.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 297 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P19A_4 żY QUE OPINION TIENE DE EL (ELLA)..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 6 1.9 39.0 39.0 REGULAR 2 3 1.2 23.7 62.7 NS/NC 4 5 1.8 37.3 100.0 0 285 95.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 15 Missing cases 285 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P19A_5 żY QUE OPINION TIENE DE EL (ELLA)..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 1 .3 21.4 21.4 REGULAR 2 1 .3 21.9 43.4 NS/NC 4 2 .7 56.6 100.0 0 296 98.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 296 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P20 żEN POLITICA QUE PREFIERE USTED...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAS VALE MALO CONOCI 1 93 31.0 31.0 31.0 EL QUE NO ARRIESGA.. 2 138 46.1 46.1 77.1 NINGUNA ANTERIOR 3 48 15.9 15.9 93.1 NS 4 19 6.4 6.4 99.5 NC 5 2 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P21_1 HA OIDO DE...DULCE CERVERA CETINA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 283 94.2 94.2 94.2 SI 3 17 5.8 5.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P21_2 HA OIDO DE...JOSE IGNACIO SEARA SIERRA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 290 96.8 96.8 96.8 SI 3 10 3.2 3.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P21_3 HA OIDO DE...LUIS ROBERTO SILVA PEREZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 279 93.1 93.1 93.1 NC 2 1 .4 .4 93.6 SI 3 19 6.4 6.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P21_4 HA OIDO DE...JOSE JABER RAFFUL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 294 97.9 97.9 97.9 NC 2 1 .4 .4 98.3 SI 3 5 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 32 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P21_5 HA OIDO DE...RICARDO OCAMPO FERNANDEZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 286 95.4 95.4 95.4 NC 2 1 .4 .4 95.9 SI 3 12 4.1 4.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P21_6 HA OIDO DE...DAVID RAZU VERA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 294 98.1 98.1 98.1 NC 2 1 .4 .4 98.5 SI 3 4 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P21A_1 żY QUE OPINION TIENE DE EL (ELLA)..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 2 .5 9.5 9.5 REGULAR 2 11 3.6 62.3 71.8 NS/NC 4 5 1.6 28.2 100.0 0 283 94.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 17 Missing cases 283 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 33 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P21A_2 żY QUE OPINION TIENE DE EL (ELLA)..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 2 .7 23.6 23.6 REGULAR 2 6 1.9 59.8 83.5 NS/NC 4 2 .5 16.5 100.0 0 290 96.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 10 Missing cases 290 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P21A_3 żY QUE OPINION TIENE DE EL (ELLA)..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 5 1.8 28.2 28.2 REGULAR 2 7 2.2 34.6 62.8 MALA 3 3 1.1 16.4 79.1 NS/NC 4 4 1.3 20.9 100.0 0 281 93.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 19 Missing cases 281 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P21A_4 żY QUE OPINION TIENE DE EL (ELLA)..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 1 .3 16.0 16.0 REGULAR 2 3 .9 54.5 70.5 NS/NC 4 2 .5 29.5 100.0 0 295 98.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 5 Missing cases 295 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 34 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P21A_5 żY QUE OPINION TIENE DE EL (ELLA)..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 3 1.0 23.5 23.5 REGULAR 2 7 2.2 52.7 76.2 MALA 3 1 .5 11.5 87.7 NS/NC 4 2 .5 12.3 100.0 0 288 95.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 12 Missing cases 288 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P21A_6 żY QUE OPINION TIENE DE EL (ELLA)..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 2 .8 55.8 55.8 REGULAR 2 1 .3 21.1 76.8 MALA 3 1 .3 23.2 100.0 0 296 98.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 296 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 35 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P22 CANDIDATOS PRI A DIPUTADO, QUIEN PREFIER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FERNANDO RAFFUL MIGU 1 3 1.1 1.1 1.1 LUIS ROBERTO SILVA 2 6 1.9 1.9 3.0 JOSE JABER RAFFUL 3 7 2.2 2.2 5.2 GUADALUPE FONS 4 5 1.7 1.7 6.9 RICARDO OCAMPO 6 3 1.0 1.0 7.9 ARACELY ESCALANTE 7 6 1.9 1.9 9.8 DULCE CERVERA CETINA 10 8 2.5 2.5 12.3 JOSE IGNACIO SEARA 11 1 .5 .5 12.8 NO CONOCE SUFICIENTE 12 114 38.1 38.1 50.9 NINGUNO 13 103 34.4 34.4 85.3 NS 14 36 12.0 12.0 97.3 NC 15 8 2.7 2.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23 BUENO, żPOR CUAL SE INCLINA MAS...? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LUIS ROBERTO SILVA 2 3 .8 2.2 2.2 JOSE JABER RAFFUL 3 1 .3 .9 3.1 DULCE CERVERA CETINA 10 1 .3 .8 3.9 NS 12 92 30.8 80.9 84.8 NC 13 17 5.8 15.2 100.0 0 186 61.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 114 Missing cases 186 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 36 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P24 ACUERDO CON EL GIBERNADOR JORGE SALOMON Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 51 16.9 16.9 16.9 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 20 6.7 6.7 23.6 DESACUERDO PARTE 3 18 5.9 5.9 29.5 DESACUERDO 4 195 65.0 65.0 94.5 NS 5 12 4.1 4.1 98.7 NC 6 4 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P25 SI HOY ELECC GOBERNADOR...(FUTURO) QUIEN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 4 1.4 1.4 1.4 PRI 2 178 59.4 59.4 60.8 PRD 4 38 12.6 12.6 73.4 PT 8 1 .3 .3 73.7 OTRO 10 3 .9 .9 74.6 NINGUNO 11 29 9.8 9.8 84.4 NO IRIA A VOTAR 95 3 1.1 1.1 85.5 DEPENDE DE CANDIDATO 96 13 4.4 4.4 89.9 NC 98 6 2.0 2.0 91.9 NS 99 24 8.1 8.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 37 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P25A INDEPENDIENTE A CANDIDAT, POR QUE PARTID Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PRI 2 3 .9 19.8 19.8 OTRO 10 1 .3 7.0 26.7 NINGUNO 11 2 .6 14.5 41.2 NS 99 8 2.6 58.8 100.0 0 287 95.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 13 Missing cases 287 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P26 NORMALMENTE SE CONSIDERA.....? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PRIISTA 1 178 59.4 59.4 59.4 PANISTA 2 6 2.0 2.0 61.4 PERREDISTA 3 25 8.4 8.4 69.8 NO SE IDENTIFICA 4 78 26.0 26.0 95.9 OTRO 5 1 .3 .3 96.2 NC 6 12 3.8 3.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 153 51.1 51.1 51.1 femenino 2 147 48.9 48.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 38 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 88 29.5 29.5 29.5 26-40 2 113 37.7 37.7 67.2 41-60 3 69 23.1 23.1 90.3 61 + 4 28 9.4 9.4 99.6 Nc 99 1 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESCOL Escolaridad entrevistado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 42 14.1 14.1 14.1 prim inc 2 98 32.7 32.7 46.8 prim comp 3 69 23.0 23.0 69.8 sec incomp 4 19 6.3 6.3 76.1 sec completa 5 33 11.0 11.0 87.1 Prepa incompleta 6 12 3.9 3.9 91.0 Prepa completa 7 10 3.4 3.4 94.3 Universidad incomple 8 8 2.7 2.7 97.1 Universidad Completa 9 9 2.9 2.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 39 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST ESCOL_1 Que carrera o estudios hizo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LIC CONTADURIA 60 1 .3 5.0 5.0 LIC DERECHO 61 1 .4 7.7 12.6 MEDICO 66 3 .9 16.7 29.4 LIC SOCIOLOGIA 68 1 .3 4.9 34.3 ING AGRONOMO 75 3 1.0 17.6 51.9 ING CIVIL 79 1 .4 7.4 59.3 ING INDUSTRIAL 80 1 .3 6.0 65.4 LIC EN ENFERMERIA 106 1 .2 4.0 69.3 NC 998 5 1.7 30.7 100.0 0 283 94.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 17 Missing cases 283 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE4 Actividad la semana pasada... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Trabajó 1 164 54.5 54.5 54.5 Vacaciones (incap) 2 1 .3 .3 54.9 Ama de casa 3 106 35.4 35.4 90.3 Estudiante 4 22 7.3 7.3 97.6 Jubilado/Pensionado 5 3 1.0 1.0 98.6 Desempleado 6 4 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 40 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST PELEA PARA PDTE MUNICIPAL, POR QUIEN VOTARIA.. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 5 1.8 1.8 1.8 PRI 2 172 57.4 57.4 59.2 PRD 4 30 10.1 10.1 69.2 PARM 6 1 .4 .4 69.7 PDM 7 2 .5 .5 70.2 NINGUNO 11 24 8.1 8.1 78.4 NS 12 49 16.4 16.4 94.8 NC-BLANCO 13 11 3.6 3.6 98.3 ANULADO 14 5 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELEB PARA DIPUTADO FEDERAL, POR QUIEN VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 4 1.4 1.4 1.4 PRI 2 175 58.4 58.4 59.8 PRD 4 34 11.5 11.5 71.2 PT 8 2 .7 .7 71.9 NINGUNO 11 26 8.6 8.6 80.6 NS 12 43 14.3 14.3 94.8 NC-BLANCO 13 15 4.9 4.9 99.8 ANULADO 14 1 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 41 PRE ELECTORAL ESCARCEGA (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/14/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST This procedure was completed at 13:05:08 End of Include file.