The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 300 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 7289 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 911 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATH Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CAM10297 300 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESTADO ESTADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CAMPECHE 4 300 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MUN MUNICIPIO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TENABO 8 300 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST ESTRATO ESTRATO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MARG. MUY ALTA 4 230 76.7 76.7 76.7 MARG. RURAL 7 70 23.3 23.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SITEDO SITUACION ACTUAL DE CAMPECHE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 39 12.9 12.9 12.9 IGUAL DE BIEN 2 36 11.9 11.9 24.8 IGUAL DE MAL 3 61 20.2 20.2 45.0 PEOR 4 134 44.6 44.6 89.6 NS 5 29 9.8 9.8 99.4 NC 6 2 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 SITUACION DEL ESTADO AÑO QUE ENTRA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 91 30.4 30.4 30.4 IGUAL DE BIEN 2 24 7.9 7.9 38.4 IGUAL DE MAL 3 38 12.6 12.6 51.0 PEOR 4 73 24.3 24.3 75.3 NS 5 72 24.1 24.1 99.4 NC 6 2 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P4 CON LO HECHO X PDTE MUN ¿MUN A MEJORADO? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent HA MEJORADO 1 118 39.4 39.4 39.4 NO HA CAMBIADO 2 136 45.3 45.3 84.7 HA EMPEORADO 3 43 14.3 14.3 99.0 NS 4 2 .5 .5 99.5 NC 5 2 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 CUAL SE ACERCA MAS A LO QUE PIENSA... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SIEMPRE VOTA X MISMO 1 202 67.2 67.2 67.2 AVECES VOTA X UNO 2 73 24.2 24.2 91.4 NINGUNA DE LAS DOS 3 17 5.6 5.6 97.0 NS 4 4 1.4 1.4 98.3 NC 5 5 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6_1 OIDO HABLAR DE: ANTONIO MENA MUÑOZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 127 42.2 42.2 42.2 SI 3 173 57.8 57.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P6_2 OIDO HABLAR DE: EUDALDO CHAVEZ MOLINA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 136 45.3 45.3 45.3 SI 3 164 54.7 54.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6_3 OIDO HABLAR DE: ELMER RUIZ MIJANGOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 156 52.1 52.1 52.1 NC 2 1 .2 .2 52.3 SI 3 143 47.7 47.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6_4 OIDO HABLAR DE: CARLOS MARENTES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 170 56.8 56.8 56.8 NC 2 2 .6 .6 57.4 SI 3 128 42.6 42.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P6_5 OIDO HABLAR DE: ANTONIO CAB POOT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 180 60.1 60.1 60.1 NC 2 1 .3 .3 60.4 SI 3 119 39.6 39.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6_6 OIDO HABLAR DE: VICTOR PECH MENA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 204 68.0 68.0 68.0 NC 2 2 .6 .6 68.6 SI 3 94 31.4 31.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6A_1 OPINION DE: ANTONIO MENA MUÑOZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 67 22.4 38.7 38.7 REGULAR 2 62 20.8 36.0 74.6 MALA 3 27 9.0 15.6 90.2 NS/NC 4 17 5.6 9.8 100.0 0 127 42.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 173 Missing cases 127 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P6A_2 OPINION DE: EUDALDO CHAVEZ MOLINA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 79 26.4 48.2 48.2 REGULAR 2 48 16.0 29.3 77.5 MALA 3 19 6.2 11.4 88.9 NS/NC 4 18 6.1 11.1 100.0 0 136 45.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 164 Missing cases 136 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6A_3 OPINION DE: ELMER RUIZ MIJANGOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 44 14.5 30.4 30.4 REGULAR 2 66 22.0 46.1 76.5 MALA 3 22 7.2 15.1 91.7 NS/NC 4 12 4.0 8.3 100.0 0 157 52.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 143 Missing cases 157 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6A_4 OPINION DE: CARLOS MARENTES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 34 11.4 26.6 26.6 REGULAR 2 59 19.6 46.1 72.7 MALA 3 18 6.1 14.3 87.0 NS/NC 4 17 5.6 13.0 100.0 0 172 57.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 128 Missing cases 172 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P6A_5 OPINION DE: ANTONIO CAB POOT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 27 9.0 22.9 22.9 REGULAR 2 49 16.3 41.7 64.6 MALA 3 23 7.6 19.4 84.0 NS/NC 4 19 6.3 16.0 100.0 0 182 60.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 118 Missing cases 182 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6A_6 OPINION DE: VICTOR PECH MENA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 24 7.9 25.2 25.2 REGULAR 2 44 14.6 46.4 71.6 MALA 3 17 5.7 18.0 89.6 NS/NC 4 10 3.3 10.4 100.0 0 206 68.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 94 Missing cases 206 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7 MAS IMPORTANTE EN PROXIMO PDTE MUNICIPAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXPER PARA GOB 1 157 52.3 52.3 52.3 OPCION DE CAMBIO 2 115 38.5 38.5 90.7 NINGUNA 3 12 4.1 4.1 94.9 NS 4 10 3.3 3.3 98.1 NC 5 6 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P8_1 OIDO HABLAR DE: EFRAIN XOOL UC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 118 39.4 39.4 39.4 SI 3 182 60.6 60.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8_2 OIDO HABLAR DE: LUIS LOPEZ VELAZQUEZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 145 48.5 48.5 48.5 SI 3 155 51.5 51.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8_3 OIDO HABLAR DE: JOSE FRANCISCO MATU TUZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 161 53.6 53.6 53.6 SI 3 139 46.4 46.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P8_4 OIDO HABLAR DE: MARIO MONROY BARAHONA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 173 57.7 57.7 57.7 SI 3 127 42.3 42.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8_5 OIDO HABLAR DE: WILBERTH RUIZ POOT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 194 64.5 64.5 64.5 SI 3 107 35.5 35.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8_6 OIDO HABLAR DE: PONCIANO NARVAEZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 165 55.1 55.1 55.1 NC 2 2 .5 .5 55.6 SI 3 133 44.4 44.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P8A_1 OPINION DE: EFRAIN XOOL UC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 55 18.4 30.3 30.3 REGULAR 2 61 20.3 33.5 63.8 MALA 3 53 17.8 29.3 93.1 NS/NC 4 13 4.2 6.9 100.0 0 118 39.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 182 Missing cases 118 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8A_2 OPINION DE: LUIS LOPEZ VELAZQUEZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 49 16.3 31.7 31.7 REGULAR 2 61 20.2 39.3 71.0 MALA 3 35 11.6 22.6 93.6 NS/NC 4 10 3.3 6.4 100.0 0 145 48.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 155 Missing cases 145 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8A_3 OPINION DE: JOSE FRANCISCO MATU TUZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 40 13.4 28.9 28.9 REGULAR 2 56 18.8 40.5 69.4 MALA 3 32 10.8 23.2 92.6 NS/NC 4 10 3.4 7.4 100.0 0 161 53.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 139 Missing cases 161 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P8A_4 OPINION DE: MARIO MONROY BARAHONA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 38 12.6 29.8 29.8 REGULAR 2 50 16.7 39.6 69.4 MALA 3 31 10.2 24.1 93.5 NS/NC 4 8 2.8 6.5 100.0 0 173 57.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 127 Missing cases 173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8A_5 OPINION DE: WILBERTH RUIZ POOT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 27 9.0 25.2 25.2 REGULAR 2 36 11.9 33.6 58.8 MALA 3 38 12.7 35.9 94.7 NS/NC 4 6 1.9 5.3 100.0 0 194 64.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 107 Missing cases 194 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8A_6 OPINION DE: PONCIANO NARVAEZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 34 11.5 25.9 25.9 REGULAR 2 50 16.8 37.7 63.6 MALA 3 37 12.2 27.5 91.1 NS/NC 4 12 3.9 8.9 100.0 0 167 55.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 133 Missing cases 167 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P9 UNICOS CANDIDATOS PRD...¿A QUIEN PREFERI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EUDALDO CHAVEZ MOLIN 1 84 28.1 28.1 28.1 JOSE FRANCISCO MATU 2 8 2.8 2.8 30.9 NO LOS CONOCE SUFICI 3 63 20.9 20.9 51.8 NINGUNO 4 99 32.9 32.9 84.7 NS 5 46 15.3 15.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P10 MAS IMPORTANTE AL DECIDIR COMO VOTAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CANDIDATO 1 165 54.9 55.1 55.1 PARTIDO 2 124 41.4 41.5 96.6 NS 3 6 2.1 2.1 98.7 NC 4 4 1.3 1.3 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 299 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P11 UNICOS CANDIDATOS PT...¿A QUIEN PREFERIR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MARIO MONROY BARAHON 1 40 13.3 13.3 13.3 VICTOR PECH MENA 2 6 2.1 2.1 15.3 NO LOS CONOCE SUFICI 3 81 26.9 26.9 42.2 NINGUNO 4 128 42.7 42.7 84.9 NS 5 44 14.7 14.7 99.6 NC 6 1 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P12 CANDIDATOS PRI PTE MUN ¿A QUIEN PREFERIR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EFRAIN XOOL UC 1 10 3.3 3.3 3.3 ANTONIO MENA MUÑOZ 2 18 6.1 6.1 9.4 EÑMER RUIZ MIJANGOS 3 16 5.3 5.3 14.7 CARLOS MARENTES 4 7 2.2 2.2 17.0 ANTONIO CAB POOT 5 8 2.8 2.8 19.8 LUIS LOPEZ VELAZQUEZ 6 7 2.4 2.4 22.2 PONCIANO NARVAEZ 7 23 7.8 7.8 30.0 WILBERTH RUIZ POOT 8 5 1.7 1.7 31.6 NO LOS CONOCE SUFICI 9 46 15.2 15.2 46.9 NINGUNO 10 98 32.5 32.5 79.4 11 60 19.9 19.9 99.4 NS 12 2 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P13 ¿POR CUAL DE ELLOS SE INCLINARIA MAS? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EFRAIN XOOL UC 1 2 .8 5.1 5.1 ANTONIO MENA MUÑOZ 2 3 .9 5.9 11.0 PONCIANO NARVAEZ 7 2 .5 3.3 14.3 NS 9 36 11.9 78.1 92.4 NC 10 3 1.2 7.6 100.0 0 254 84.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 46 Missing cases 254 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P14 ACUERDO CON PRESIDENTE MUNICIPAL? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 139 46.2 46.3 46.3 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 71 23.7 23.7 70.1 DESACUERDO EN PARTE 3 8 2.8 2.8 72.8 DESACUERDO 4 62 20.7 20.8 93.6 NS 5 9 2.9 3.0 96.6 NC 6 10 3.4 3.4 100.0 0 1 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 299 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P15_1 VOTOS: PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 287 95.8 95.8 95.8 UNO 1 5 1.5 1.5 97.3 CINCO 5 8 2.7 2.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P15_2 VOTOS: PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 139 46.3 46.3 46.3 UNO 1 3 .9 .9 47.2 DOS 2 8 2.7 2.7 49.9 TRES 3 2 .8 .8 50.6 CUATRO 4 1 .3 .3 50.9 CINCO 5 147 49.1 49.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P15_3 VOTOS: PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 233 77.8 77.8 77.8 UNO 1 4 1.3 1.3 79.1 DOS 2 8 2.7 2.7 81.8 TRES 3 2 .6 .6 82.4 CINCO 5 53 17.6 17.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P15_4 VOTOS: PT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 287 95.8 95.8 95.8 UNO 1 5 1.5 1.5 97.3 TRES 3 2 .6 .6 97.9 CINCO 5 6 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P15_5 VOTOS: PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 300 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P15_6 VOTOS: OTRO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 300 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P15_7 VOTOS: ABSTENCION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 277 92.3 92.3 92.3 CINCO 5 23 7.7 7.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P15_8 VOTOS: NS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 251 83.7 83.7 83.7 CINCO 5 49 16.3 16.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P15_9 VOTOS: NC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERO 0 300 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P16 CUAL SE ACERCA MAS A LO QUE PIENSA... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent A GOB LE IMPORTA GEN 1 79 26.2 26.2 26.2 A GOB NO LE IMPORTA 2 198 66.1 66.1 92.4 NINGUNA 3 1 .3 .3 92.7 NS 4 12 3.9 3.9 96.6 NC 5 10 3.4 3.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P18 OIDO HABLAR POSIBLE CANDIDATO PRD DIP.FE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 25 8.2 8.2 8.2 NO 2 275 91.8 91.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P18A SI ¿QUIEN? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent JULIO MATU 11 2 .7 9.0 9.0 MARCELINO SANSORES 12 1 .3 3.2 12.1 FRANCISCO MATY 13 1 .4 4.5 16.6 NC 98 1 .3 4.2 20.8 NS 99 20 6.5 79.2 100.0 0 275 91.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 25 Missing cases 275 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P19 OIDO HABLAR POSIBLE CANDIDATO PAN DIP.FE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 4 1.2 1.2 1.2 NO 2 296 98.8 98.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P19A SI ¿QUIEN? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NC 98 1 .3 26.4 26.4 NS 99 3 .9 73.6 100.0 0 296 98.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 296 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P20 ACUERDO CON EL PRESIDENTE ZEDILLO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 185 61.7 61.7 61.7 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 59 19.8 19.8 81.5 DESACUERDO EN PARTE 3 10 3.2 3.2 84.7 DESACUERDO 4 38 12.5 12.5 97.2 NS 5 6 2.0 2.0 99.2 NC 6 2 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P21_1 OIDO HABLAR DE: RAMON SANTINI PECH Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 188 62.8 62.8 62.8 NC 2 1 .3 .3 63.1 SI 3 111 36.9 36.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P21_2 OIDO HABLAR DE: ERACLIO SOBERANIS SOSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 225 75.0 75.0 75.0 SI 3 75 25.0 25.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P21_3 OIDO HABLAR DE: JORGE LUIS LAVALLE AZAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 261 87.1 87.1 87.1 SI 3 39 12.9 12.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P21_4 OIDO HABLAR DE: VICTOR MENDEZ LANZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 263 87.7 87.7 87.7 SI 3 37 12.3 12.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P21A_1 OPINION DE: RAMON SANTINI PECH Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 39 13.1 35.5 35.5 REGULAR 2 51 17.0 46.1 81.6 MALA 3 11 3.5 9.6 91.2 NS/NC 4 10 3.3 8.8 100.0 0 189 63.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 111 Missing cases 189 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P21A_2 OPINION DE: ERACLIO SOBERANIS SOSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 25 8.4 33.7 33.7 REGULAR 2 33 11.1 44.2 77.9 MALA 3 6 2.0 8.0 86.0 NS/NC 4 11 3.5 14.0 100.0 0 225 75.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 75 Missing cases 225 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P21A_3 OPINION DE: JORGE LUIS LAVALLE AZAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 15 5.0 38.5 38.5 REGULAR 2 14 4.6 35.7 74.3 MALA 3 5 1.6 12.4 86.7 NS/NC 4 5 1.7 13.3 100.0 0 261 87.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 39 Missing cases 261 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P21A_4 OPINION DE: VICTOR MENDEZ LANZ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 10 3.4 27.6 27.6 REGULAR 2 19 6.2 50.2 77.8 MALA 3 4 1.2 10.0 87.8 NS/NC 4 4 1.5 12.2 100.0 0 263 87.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 37 Missing cases 263 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 32 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P22 EN POLITICA QUE PREFIERE USTED... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAS VALE MALO X CONO 1 121 40.2 40.2 40.2 EL QUE NO ARRIESGA 2 132 44.1 44.1 84.3 NINGUNA DE LAS ANTER 3 20 6.6 6.6 90.9 NS 4 17 5.8 5.8 96.7 NC 5 10 3.3 3.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23_1 OIDO HABLAR DE: TIRSO DE LA GALA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 176 58.7 58.7 58.7 NC 2 1 .3 .3 59.0 SI 3 123 41.0 41.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23_2 OIDO HABLAR DE: ALFONSO CARRILLO ZAVALA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 214 71.2 71.2 71.2 SI 3 86 28.8 28.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 33 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P23_3 OIDO HABLAR DE: LUIS SARMIENTO VILLACIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 223 74.4 74.4 74.4 SI 3 77 25.6 25.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23_4 OIDO HABLAR DE: MARGARITA ALFARO WARING Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 268 89.4 89.4 89.4 SI 3 32 10.6 10.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23_5 OIDO HABLAR DE: ENRIQUE KU HERRERA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 274 91.5 91.5 91.5 NC 2 1 .4 .4 91.9 SI 3 24 8.1 8.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 34 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P23_6 OIDO HABLAR DE: JOSE DEL CARMEN SOBERANI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 1 271 90.4 90.4 90.4 NC 2 3 .9 .9 91.3 SI 3 26 8.7 8.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23A_1 OPINION DE: TIRSO DE LA GALA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 45 15.1 36.9 36.9 REGULAR 2 48 16.1 39.1 76.0 MALA 3 8 2.8 6.8 82.8 NS/NC 4 21 7.0 17.2 100.0 0 177 59.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 123 Missing cases 177 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23A_2 OPINION DE: ALFONSO CARRILLO ZAVALA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 26 8.7 30.2 30.2 REGULAR 2 37 12.4 43.0 73.2 MALA 3 11 3.6 12.5 85.7 NS/NC 4 12 4.1 14.3 100.0 0 214 71.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 214 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 35 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P23A_3 OPINION DE: LUIS SARMIENTO VILLACIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 13 4.4 17.3 17.3 REGULAR 2 44 14.8 57.6 74.9 MALA 3 10 3.3 12.7 87.6 NS/NC 4 10 3.2 12.4 100.0 0 223 74.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 77 Missing cases 223 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23A_4 OPINION DE: MARGARITA ALFARO WARING Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 11 3.6 34.1 34.1 REGULAR 2 14 4.7 44.4 78.5 MALA 3 5 1.5 14.4 93.0 NS/NC 4 2 .7 7.0 100.0 0 268 89.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 32 Missing cases 268 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23A_5 OPINION DE: ENRIQUE KU HERRERA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 8 2.7 33.6 33.6 REGULAR 2 15 5.0 61.1 94.7 MALA 3 1 .4 5.3 100.0 0 276 91.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 24 Missing cases 276 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 36 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P23A_6 OPINION DE: JOSE DEL CARMEN SOBERANIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUENA 1 9 3.0 34.0 34.0 REGULAR 2 14 4.8 55.0 89.0 MALA 3 2 .7 7.9 97.0 NS/NC 4 1 .3 3.0 100.0 0 274 91.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 26 Missing cases 274 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P24 CANDIDATOS PRI DIP.FED ¿A QUIEN PREFERIR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent RAMON SANTINI PECH 1 15 5.0 5.0 5.0 ERACLIO SOBERANIS SO 2 9 2.9 2.9 8.0 JORGE LUIS LAVALLE A 3 1 .3 .3 8.2 VICTOR MENDEZ LANZ 4 1 .2 .2 8.5 TIRSO DE LA GALA 5 21 6.9 6.9 15.4 ALFONSO CARRILLO ZAV 6 6 2.1 2.1 17.5 LUIS SARMIENTO VILLA 7 5 1.6 1.6 19.1 MARGARITA ALFARO WAR 8 3 .9 .9 20.0 ENRIQUE KU HERRERA 9 3 .9 .9 20.9 JOSE DEL CARMEN SOBE 10 1 .3 .3 21.1 NO LOS CONOCE SUFICI 11 53 17.5 17.5 38.7 NINGUNO 12 116 38.8 38.8 77.5 NS 13 63 20.9 20.9 98.4 NC 14 5 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 37 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P25 ¿POR CUAL DE ELLOS SE INCLINARIA MAS? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent RAMON SANTINI PECH 1 1 .4 2.4 2.4 NS 11 50 16.6 94.8 97.3 NC 12 1 .5 2.7 100.0 0 247 82.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 53 Missing cases 247 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P26 ACUERDO CON GOBERNADOR JORGE SALOMON AZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 54 18.1 18.1 18.1 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 25 8.3 8.3 26.4 DESACUERDO EN PARTE 3 7 2.5 2.5 28.8 DESACUERDO 4 200 66.5 66.5 95.4 NS 5 11 3.7 3.7 99.1 NC 6 3 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 38 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P27 SI HOY ELEC PARA GOB ¿X CUAL VOTARIA? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 7 2.3 2.3 2.3 PRI 2 145 48.3 48.3 50.6 PRD 4 58 19.4 19.4 70.0 PT 8 9 3.1 3.1 73.1 OTRO 10 1 .3 .3 73.5 NINGUNO 11 7 2.4 2.4 75.9 NO IRIA A VOTAR 95 4 1.4 1.4 77.3 DEPENDE CANDIDATOS 96 35 11.6 11.6 88.9 NC 98 1 .3 .3 89.2 NS 99 32 10.8 10.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P27A INDEPENDIENTEMENTE DE CANDIDATOS X CUAL. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PRI 2 4 1.2 10.2 10.2 NINGUNO 11 4 1.4 12.4 22.6 NS 99 27 8.9 77.4 100.0 0 265 88.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 35 Missing cases 265 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 39 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST P28 NORMALMENTE USTED SE CONSIDERA... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PRIISTA 1 152 50.5 50.5 50.5 PANISTA 2 8 2.6 2.6 53.2 PERREDISTA 3 44 14.5 14.5 67.7 NO SE IDENTIFICA CON 4 84 28.0 28.0 95.7 OTRO 5 5 1.8 1.8 97.4 NC 6 8 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 149 49.8 49.8 49.8 femenino 2 151 50.2 50.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 89 29.8 29.8 29.8 26-40 2 111 37.2 37.2 66.9 41-60 3 68 22.7 22.7 89.6 61-+ 4 27 9.1 9.1 98.7 Nc 99 4 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 40 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST ESCOL Escolaridad entrevistado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 67 22.2 22.2 22.2 prim inc 2 91 30.2 30.2 52.4 prim comp 3 57 18.9 18.9 71.3 sec incomp 4 13 4.4 4.4 75.7 sec completa 5 35 11.7 11.7 87.4 Prepa incompleta 6 6 2.1 2.1 89.5 Prepa completa 7 18 6.0 6.0 95.5 Universidad incomple 8 7 2.2 2.2 97.8 Universidad Completa 9 7 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESCOL_1 Que carrera o estudios hizo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEDICO 66 1 .3 5.8 5.8 ING AGRONOMO 75 2 .5 11.7 17.5 LIC CIENCIAS POLITIC 92 1 .4 9.6 27.1 LIC EN EDUCACION 96 5 1.8 40.7 67.8 ING TOPOGRAFO 104 1 .3 5.9 73.6 MAESTRIA EN DERECHO 121 1 .2 4.8 78.4 NC 998 3 1.0 21.6 100.0 0 287 95.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 13 Missing cases 287 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 41 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST SE4 Actividad la semana pasada... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Trabajó 1 152 50.7 50.7 50.7 Vacaciones (incap) 2 1 .2 .2 50.9 Ama de casa 3 115 38.3 38.3 89.3 Estudiante 4 18 6.0 6.0 95.3 Jubilado/Pensionado 5 2 .5 .5 95.8 Desempleado 6 4 1.4 1.4 97.3 Incapacitado Permane 7 7 2.5 2.5 99.7 Nc 98 1 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELEA SI HOY ELEC PTE.MUN ¿X CUAL VOTARIA? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 6 2.2 2.2 2.2 PRI 2 138 46.1 46.1 48.2 PRD 4 56 18.7 18.7 67.0 PC 5 1 .3 .3 67.3 PT 8 9 3.1 3.1 70.4 NINGUNO 11 22 7.2 7.2 77.7 NO SABE 12 60 20.0 20.0 97.6 13 6 2.1 2.1 99.7 14 1 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 42 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST PELEB SI HOY ELEC DIP.FED ¿X CUAL VOTARIA? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 7 2.2 2.2 2.2 PRI 2 139 46.4 46.4 48.6 PRD 4 55 18.3 18.3 67.0 PC 5 1 .3 .3 67.3 PT 8 8 2.6 2.6 69.9 NINGUNO 11 22 7.3 7.3 77.2 NO SABE 12 59 19.6 19.6 96.9 13 9 3.1 3.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 300 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 300 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 43 PRE-ELECTORAL TENABO, CAM (MUNICIPAL) FEB/97 CAMPO 2/11/97 FRECUENCIAS ESCARCEGA PONDERADAS (CAM10297) FRECPOND.LST This procedure was completed at 13:23:21 End of Include file.