The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 3480 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 7856 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 982 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1 SE ENTERO DE ACONTECIMIENTO POLITICO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 7808794 62.3 62.3 62.3 NO 2 4129155 32.9 32.9 95.2 NO SABE 3 560392 4.5 4.5 99.7 NO CONTESTO 4 41159 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 SI, QUE OCURRIO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DESIGNACION DE LDC C 1 6095791 48.6 78.1 78.1 ELECCIONES EN YUCATA 2 468154 3.7 6.0 84.1 OTRO 3 1084462 8.6 13.9 97.9 NO SABE 4 130322 1.0 1.7 99.6 NO CONTESTO 5 30065 .2 .4 100.0 0 4730706 37.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 7808794 Missing cases 5.E+06 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P3 SITUACION ACTUAL DEL PAIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 6751356 53.8 53.8 53.8 IGUAL 2 3028489 24.2 24.2 78.0 PEOR 3 2310363 18.4 18.4 96.4 NO SABE 4 405241 3.2 3.2 99.6 NO CONTESTO 5 44051 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4 SITUACION POLITICA DEL PAIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PELIGROSA 1 1158951 9.2 9.2 9.2 PREOCUPANTE 2 4049339 32.3 32.3 41.5 TRANQUILA 3 4702071 37.5 37.5 79.0 MEJOR QUE ANTES 4 1503556 12.0 12.0 91.0 OTRO 5 166391 1.3 1.3 92.4 NO SABE 6 872035 7.0 7.0 99.3 NO CONTESTO 7 87158 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 SABE CUANDO SE ELEGIRA PRESIDENTE DE LA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 8581267 68.4 68.4 68.4 NO 2 3893109 31.0 31.0 99.5 NO CONTESTO 3 65124 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P5_1 SI, CUANDO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EN AGOSTO DE 1994 1 1844676 14.7 21.5 21.5 EN 1994 O PROXIMO AÑ 2 5568696 44.4 64.9 86.4 OTRA FECHA 3 897957 7.2 10.5 96.9 NO SABE 4 227065 1.8 2.6 99.5 NO CONTESTO 5 42872 .3 .5 100.0 0 3958233 31.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 8581267 Missing cases 4.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7 DONDE SITUARIA INTERES EN PROXIMA ELECCI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NADA INTERESADO 1 2156236 17.2 17.2 17.2 2 1863839 14.9 14.9 32.1 3 3292434 26.3 26.3 58.3 4 1731273 13.8 13.8 72.1 MUY INTERESADO 5 3164333 25.2 25.2 97.4 NO SABE 6 253771 2.0 2.0 99.4 NO CONTESTO 7 77615 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8 SABE QUIEN ES CANDIDATO DEL PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 3993508 31.8 31.8 31.8 NO 2 8445189 67.3 67.3 99.2 NO CONTESTO 3 100803 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P8_1 SI, QUIEN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CORRECTO 1 2941249 23.5 73.7 73.7 INCORRECTO 2 714000 5.7 17.9 91.5 NO CONTESTO 3 338260 2.7 8.5 100.0 0 8545992 68.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3993508 Missing cases 9.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9 SABE QUIEN ES CANDIDATO DEL PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 6534544 52.1 52.1 52.1 NO 2 5953127 47.5 47.5 99.6 NO CONTESTO 3 51830 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9_1 SI, QUIEN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CORRECTO 1 6270054 50.0 96.0 96.0 INCORRECTO 2 163789 1.3 2.5 98.5 NO CONTESTO 3 100701 .8 1.5 100.0 0 6004956 47.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6534544 Missing cases 6.E+06 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P10 SABE QUIEN ES CANDIDATO DEL PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 9296342 74.1 74.1 74.1 NO 2 3180018 25.4 25.4 99.5 NO CONTESTO 3 63140 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P10_1 SI, QUIEN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CORRECTO 1 8498963 67.8 91.4 91.4 INCORRECTO 2 574278 4.6 6.2 97.6 NO CONTESTO 3 223100 1.8 2.4 100.0 0 3243158 25.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 9296342 Missing cases 3.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P11 NO SE ENTERO QUE COLOSIO FUE POSTULADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 1641360 13.1 40.6 40.6 NO 2 2031033 16.2 50.3 90.9 NO SABE 3 234313 1.9 5.8 96.7 NO CONTESTO 4 133831 1.1 3.3 100.0 0 8498963 67.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4040537 Missing cases 8.E+06 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P12 QUE TAN INFORMADO ESTA SOBRE LDC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 1980875 15.8 29.9 29.9 2 2077467 16.6 31.4 61.3 3 1495306 11.9 22.6 83.8 4 472312 3.8 7.1 91.0 LO CONOZCO BIEN 5 494783 3.9 7.5 98.4 NO SABE 6 82936 .7 1.3 99.7 NO CONTESTO 7 19935 .2 .3 100.0 NO SE NADA DE EL 0 5915887 47.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6623613 Missing cases 6.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P13 QUE OPINION TIENE DE EL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUY BUENA 1 447657 3.6 6.8 6.8 BUENA 2 3111607 24.8 47.0 53.7 REGULAR 3 1757316 14.0 26.5 80.3 MALA 4 207922 1.7 3.1 83.4 MUY MALA 5 89366 .7 1.3 84.8 NO SABE 6 875246 7.0 13.2 98.0 NO CONTESTO 7 134500 1.1 2.0 100.0 0 5915887 47.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6623613 Missing cases 6.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P14 VOTARIA UD POR LDC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 3950613 31.5 59.6 59.6 NO 2 1081898 8.6 16.3 76.0 NO SABE 3 1469509 11.7 22.2 98.2 NO CONTESTO 4 121593 1.0 1.8 100.0 0 5915887 47.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6623613 Missing cases 6.E+06 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P15_1 LDC TIENE PERSONALIDAD O NO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TIENE PERSONALIDAD P 1 4597462 36.7 69.4 69.4 NO TIENE PERSONALIDA 2 926232 7.4 14.0 83.4 NO CONTESTO 3 1099920 8.8 16.6 100.0 0 5915887 47.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6623613 Missing cases 6.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P15_2 LDC ES INTELIGENTE O NO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO ES INTELIGENTE 1 510188 4.1 7.7 7.7 ES INTELIGENTE 2 5079612 40.5 76.7 84.4 NO CONTESTO 3 1033813 8.2 15.6 100.0 0 5915887 47.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6623613 Missing cases 6.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P15_3 LDC ES CLARO AL HABLAR O NO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ES CLARO AL HABLAR 1 4401227 35.1 66.4 66.4 NO ES CLARO AL HABLA 2 888090 7.1 13.4 79.9 NO CONTESTO 3 1334296 10.6 20.1 100.0 0 5915887 47.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6623613 Missing cases 6.E+06 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P15_4 LDC SE VE INSEGURO O NO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SE VE INSEGURO 1 1055453 8.4 15.9 15.9 SE VE SEGURO 2 4495883 35.9 67.9 83.8 NO CONTESTO 3 1072278 8.6 16.2 100.0 0 5915887 47.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6623613 Missing cases 6.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P15_5 LDC TIENE CAPACIDAD O NO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TIENE CAPACIDAD PARA 1 4204218 33.5 63.5 63.5 NO TIENE CAPACIDAD P 2 859226 6.9 13.0 76.4 NO CONTESTO 3 1560170 12.4 23.6 100.0 0 5915887 47.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6623613 Missing cases 6.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P16_1 ENTRE CCS,DFC Y LDC QUIEN MAS INTELIGENT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CARDENAS 1 1117053 8.9 16.9 16.9 DIEGO FERNANDEZ DE C 2 725390 5.8 11.0 27.8 COLOSIO 3 3517942 28.1 53.1 80.9 NINGUNO 4 220535 1.8 3.3 84.3 N/S - N/C 5 1042694 8.3 15.7 100.0 0 5915887 47.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6623613 Missing cases 6.E+06 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P16_2 ENTRE CCS,DFC Y LDC QUIEN MAS SENCILLO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CARDENAS 1 1342864 10.7 20.3 20.3 DIEGO FERNANDEZ DE C 2 869893 6.9 13.1 33.4 COLOSIO 3 3084557 24.6 46.6 80.0 NINGUNO 4 412295 3.3 6.2 86.2 N/S - N/C 5 914004 7.3 13.8 100.0 0 5915887 47.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6623613 Missing cases 6.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P16_3 ENTRE CCS,DFC Y LDC QUIEN MAS CAPAZ DE G Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CARDENAS 1 847595 6.8 12.8 12.8 DIEGO FERNANDEZ DE C 2 521507 4.2 7.9 20.7 COLOSIO 3 3674916 29.3 55.5 76.2 NINGUNO 4 357115 2.8 5.4 81.5 N/S - N/C 5 1222482 9.7 18.5 100.0 0 5915887 47.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6623613 Missing cases 6.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P16_4 ENTRE CCS,DFC Y LDC QUIEN MAS MAS CLARO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CARDENAS 1 1091338 8.7 16.5 16.5 DIEGO FERNANDEZ DE C 2 518311 4.1 7.8 24.3 COLOSIO 3 3686413 29.4 55.7 80.0 NINGUNO 4 262060 2.1 4.0 83.9 N/S - N/C 5 1065492 8.5 16.1 100.0 0 5915887 47.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6623613 Missing cases 6.E+06 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P16_5 ENTRE CCS,DFC Y LDC QUIEN MAS MAS CERCAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CARDENAS 1 1755977 14.0 26.5 26.5 DIEGO FERNANDEZ DE C 2 347932 2.8 5.3 31.8 COLOSIO 3 3214878 25.6 48.5 80.3 NINGUNO 4 422351 3.4 6.4 86.7 N/S - N/C 5 882476 7.0 13.3 100.0 0 5915887 47.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6623613 Missing cases 6.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P16_6 ENTRE CCS,DFC Y LDC QUIEN CON MAS PERSON Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CARDENAS 1 821834 6.6 12.4 12.4 DIEGO FERNANDEZ DE C 2 649801 5.2 9.8 22.2 COLOSIO 3 3780792 30.2 57.1 79.3 NINGUNO 4 370214 3.0 5.6 84.9 N/S - N/C 5 1000973 8.0 15.1 100.0 0 5915887 47.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6623613 Missing cases 6.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P17 HAY ALGO QUE LE MOLESTE DE LDC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 1035399 8.3 15.6 15.6 NO 2 4980883 39.7 75.2 90.8 NO SABE 3 494639 3.9 7.5 98.3 NO CONTESTO 4 112692 .9 1.7 100.0 0 5915887 47.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6623613 Missing cases 6.E+06 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P17_1 SI, QUE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTROS 10 105782 .8 10.2 10.2 IMPOSICION DEDAZO 11 80478 .6 7.8 18.0 ME CAE MAL 12 13002 .1 1.3 19.2 INSEGURO/NERVIOSO 13 41614 .3 4.0 23.3 FALTA DE COMUNICACIO 14 13510 .1 1.3 24.6 NO ES CONOCIDO 15 14614 .1 1.4 26.0 DEMAGOGO 16 86167 .7 8.3 34.3 FALTA DE PERSONALIDA 17 168909 1.3 16.3 50.6 POR SER DEL PRI 18 177925 1.4 17.2 67.8 NO ESTA PREPARADO/MA 19 74406 .6 7.2 75.0 CUESTIONES FISICAS 20 43744 .3 4.2 79.2 MUCHA PUBLICIDAD 21 849 .0 .1 79.3 INSUFICIENTEMENTE ES 97 35782 .3 3.5 82.7 NO CONTESTO 98 67285 .5 6.5 89.2 NO SABE 99 111332 .9 10.8 100.0 0 11504101 91.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1035399 Missing cases 1.E+07 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P18 LDC ERA EL MEJOR O HABIA OTRO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ES EL MEJOR 1 2648499 21.1 40.0 40.0 HABIA OTRO 2 2476882 19.8 37.4 77.4 NO SABE 3 1433570 11.4 21.6 99.0 NO CONTESTO 4 64662 .5 1.0 100.0 0 5915887 47.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6623613 Missing cases 6.E+06 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P18_1 HABIA OTRO, QUIEN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PEDRO ASPE 1 875794 7.0 35.4 35.4 MANUEL CAMACHO 2 832534 6.6 33.6 69.0 ERNESTO ZEDILLO 3 233318 1.9 9.4 78.4 OTRO 4 324319 2.6 13.1 91.5 N/S - N/C 5 210917 1.7 8.5 100.0 0 10062618 80.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2476882 Missing cases 1.E+07 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P19 LDC CONTINUARA PROGRAMA ECONOMICO DE CSG Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI LO VA A CONTINUAR 1 4788616 38.2 72.3 72.3 NO (LO VA A CAMBIAR) 2 497337 4.0 7.5 79.8 NO SABE 3 1297209 10.3 19.6 99.4 NO CONTESTO 4 40451 .3 .6 100.0 0 5915887 47.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6623613 Missing cases 6.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P20 LDC DEBE CONTINUAR LA POLITICA ECONOMICA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEBE CONTINUAR 1 5410241 43.1 81.7 81.7 NO DEBE CONTINUAR 2 476525 3.8 7.2 88.9 NO SABE 3 695346 5.5 10.5 99.4 NO CONTESTO 4 41502 .3 .6 100.0 0 5915887 47.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6623613 Missing cases 6.E+06 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P21 SU OPINION SOBRE EL PRI MEJORO O EMPEORO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJORO 1 2482180 19.8 37.5 37.5 SE MANTUVO IGUAL 2 3172270 25.3 47.9 85.4 EMPEORO 3 551620 4.4 8.3 93.7 NO SABE 4 324002 2.6 4.9 98.6 NO CONTESTO 5 93541 .7 1.4 100.0 0 5915887 47.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6623613 Missing cases 6.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P22 SE ENTERO DE DISCURSO DE LDC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 3678310 29.3 55.5 55.5 NO 2 2877075 22.9 43.4 99.0 NO CONTESTO 3 68228 .5 1.0 100.0 0 5915887 47.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6623613 Missing cases 6.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23_1 SE ENTERO POR PERIODICO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 962250 7.7 26.2 26.2 NO MENCION 2 2716060 21.7 73.8 100.0 0 8861190 70.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3678310 Missing cases 9.E+06 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P23_2 SE ENTERO POR TV Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 3135003 25.0 85.2 85.2 NO MENCION 2 543307 4.3 14.8 100.0 0 8861190 70.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3678310 Missing cases 9.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23_3 SE ENTERO POR RADIO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 976745 7.8 26.6 26.6 NO MENCION 2 2701565 21.5 73.4 100.0 0 8861190 70.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3678310 Missing cases 9.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23_4 SE ENTERO POR COMENTARIOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 498118 4.0 13.5 13.5 NO MENCION 2 3180192 25.4 86.5 100.0 0 8861190 70.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3678310 Missing cases 9.E+06 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P23_5 SE ENTERO POR VARIOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 153185 1.2 4.2 4.2 NO MENCION 2 3525125 28.1 95.8 100.0 0 8861190 70.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3678310 Missing cases 9.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23_6 NO RECUERDA POR QUE MEDIO SE ENTERO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 35770 .3 1.0 1.0 NO MENCION 2 3642540 29.0 99.0 100.0 0 8861190 70.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3678310 Missing cases 9.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23_7 NO CONTESTO POR QUE MEDIO SE ENTERO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI MENCION 1 12328 .1 .3 .3 NO MENCION 2 3665982 29.2 99.7 100.0 0 8861190 70.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3678310 Missing cases 9.E+06 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P24 QUE FUE LO QUE MAS LE GUSTO DEL DISCURSO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTROS 10 252216 2.0 6.9 6.9 CONTINUAR EL PROYECT 11 433381 3.5 11.8 18.6 SOLIDARIDAD 12 47123 .4 1.3 19.9 APOYO A LOS POBRES Y 13 355599 2.8 9.7 29.6 MANERA DE HABLAR/SIN 14 303165 2.4 8.2 37.8 LA LUCHA POR LA DEMO 15 73030 .6 2.0 39.8 SE SIENTE PRESIDENTE 16 21355 .2 .6 40.4 TRABAJA MUY DURO POR 17 146365 1.2 4.0 44.4 ELEVAR LOS SALARIOS 18 47384 .4 1.3 45.7 ELEVAR EMPLEOS 19 74186 .6 2.0 47.7 RESPETO A LA SOBERAN 20 14947 .1 .4 48.1 DEBATE 21 93173 .7 2.5 50.6 VA A CUMPLIR TODO 22 58794 .5 1.6 52.2 CUESTIONES ECONOMICA 23 33370 .3 .9 53.1 SU PROYECTO POLITICA 24 190831 1.5 5.2 58.3 INSUFICIENTEMENTE ES 97 644761 5.1 17.5 75.8 NO CONTESTO 98 250080 2.0 6.8 82.6 NO SABE 99 638550 5.1 17.4 100.0 0 8861190 70.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3678310 Missing cases 9.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P25 QUE FUE LO QUE MENOS LE GUSTO DEL DISCUR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTROS 10 152830 1.2 4.2 4.2 COMO HABLA 11 30869 .2 .8 5.0 TODO / NO LE GUSTO 12 28628 .2 .8 5.8 DEMAGOGO 13 152595 1.2 4.1 9.9 PROYECTO POLITICO/EC 14 31095 .2 .8 10.8 IMPOSICION 15 28437 .2 .8 11.5 NO HABLO DE SU PROYE 16 38799 .3 1.1 12.6 ACERCA DE LA CAMPAÑA 17 2960 .0 .1 12.7 DECIR QUE YA ES PRES 18 32562 .3 .9 13.6 ACEPTAR EL DEBATE 19 27088 .2 .7 14.3 ALABAR A SALINAS 20 4308 .0 .1 14.4 SU DISCURSO 21 3204 .0 .1 14.5 INSUFICIENTEMENTE ES 97 1752656 14.0 47.6 62.1 NO CONTESTO 98 434968 3.5 11.8 74.0 NO SABE 99 957311 7.6 26.0 100.0 0 8861190 70.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3678310 Missing cases 9.E+06 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P26 CUANTOS VOTOS LE DARIA A LDC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 366391 2.9 5.5 5.5 2 761113 6.1 11.5 17.0 3 1232020 9.8 18.6 35.6 4 536441 4.3 8.1 43.7 5 2352385 18.8 35.5 79.2 NINGUNO 6 639462 5.1 9.7 88.9 NO SABE 7 587827 4.7 8.9 97.8 NO CONTESTO 8 147974 1.2 2.2 100.0 0 5915887 47.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6623613 Missing cases 6.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P27 PROBLEMA MAS GRAVE DEL PAIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTROS 10 261662 2.1 2.1 2.1 CRISIS ECONOMICA 11 2523391 20.1 20.1 22.2 INFLACION 12 282538 2.3 2.3 24.5 PECE 13 19069 .2 .2 24.6 DEUDA EXTERNA 14 243038 1.9 1.9 26.6 DESEMPLEO 15 2089756 16.7 16.7 43.2 POBREZA 16 873170 7.0 7.0 50.2 SALARIOS BAJOS 17 491884 3.9 3.9 54.1 SEGURIDAD PUBLICA 18 1063100 8.5 8.5 62.6 CONTAMINACION 19 1152941 9.2 9.2 71.8 TLC 20 443996 3.5 3.5 75.3 SOBREPOBLACION 21 231384 1.8 1.8 77.2 EDUCACION 22 316274 2.5 2.5 79.7 APOYO AL CAMPO 23 49469 .4 .4 80.1 MALA ADMINISTRACION 24 291422 2.3 2.3 82.4 SERVICIOS PUBLICOS 25 113546 .9 .9 83.3 CORRUPCION 26 396922 3.2 3.2 86.5 PRIVATIZACION 27 2960 .0 .0 86.5 DEMOCRACIA 28 106143 .8 .8 87.3 SALUD 29 39079 .3 .3 87.7 NINGUNA 30 8722 .1 .1 87.7 TRANSPORTE 31 64824 .5 .5 88.2 ELECCIONES CUESTIONE 32 163644 1.3 1.3 89.5 AGUA 33 23895 .2 .2 89.7 INSUFICIENTEMENTE ES 97 197006 1.6 1.6 91.3 NO CONTESTO 98 226201 1.8 1.8 93.1 NO SABE 99 863465 6.9 6.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P28 BUENO PARA MEXICO UN PDTE DE OTRO PARTID Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 3915323 31.2 31.2 31.2 SI EN PARTE 2 1857510 14.8 14.8 46.0 NO 3 4748819 37.9 37.9 83.9 NO SABE 4 1845500 14.7 14.7 98.6 NO CONTESTO 5 172348 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P29 ENTRE CCS Y LDC POR CUAL VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CCS DEL PRD 1 2891847 23.1 23.1 23.1 LDC DEL PRI 2 7079659 56.5 56.5 79.5 NINGUNO DE LOS DOS 3 1148080 9.2 9.2 88.7 NO 4 1226296 9.8 9.8 98.5 NO SABE 5 193617 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P30 QUE CANDIDATO LE INSPIRA MAS CONFIANZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DFC DEL PAN 1 1257588 10.0 10.0 10.0 LDC DEL PRI 2 6430777 51.3 51.3 61.3 CCS DEL PRD 3 2567769 20.5 20.5 81.8 NINGUNO 4 650475 5.2 5.2 87.0 NO CONOZCO A NINGUNO 5 563937 4.5 4.5 91.5 NO SABE 6 871584 7.0 7.0 98.4 NO CONTESTO 7 197370 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P31 SITUACION PERSONAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 5255677 41.9 41.9 41.9 IGUAL 2 4710577 37.6 37.6 79.5 PEOR 3 2352562 18.8 18.8 98.3 NO SABE 4 179783 1.4 1.4 99.7 NO CONTESTO 5 32207 .3 .3 100.0 0 8694 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 8694 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P32_1 CUANTOS VOTOS AL PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 1194385 9.5 34.7 34.7 2 972204 7.8 28.2 62.9 3 305246 2.4 8.9 71.8 4 101650 .8 3.0 74.7 5 869665 6.9 25.3 100.0 0 9096350 72.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3443150 Missing cases 9.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P32_2 CUANTOS VOTOS AL PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 708116 5.6 8.6 8.6 2 874783 7.0 10.7 19.3 3 1263012 10.1 15.4 34.7 4 382209 3.0 4.7 39.4 5 4973114 39.7 60.6 100.0 0 4338266 34.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 8201234 Missing cases 4.E+06 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P32_3 CUANTOS VOTOS AL PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 327763 2.6 76.1 76.1 2 38157 .3 8.9 85.0 3 21229 .2 4.9 89.9 4 8694 .1 2.0 91.9 5 34816 .3 8.1 100.0 0 12108843 96.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 430657 Missing cases 1.E+07 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P32_4 CUANTOS VOTOS AL PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 813588 6.5 23.7 23.7 2 636370 5.1 18.6 42.3 3 539110 4.3 15.7 58.0 4 101197 .8 3.0 60.9 5 1339750 10.7 39.1 100.0 0 9109484 72.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3430016 Missing cases 9.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P32_5 CUANTOS VOTOS AL PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 196211 1.6 72.8 72.8 2 35624 .3 13.2 86.0 3 27263 .2 10.1 96.1 4 333 .0 .1 96.2 5 10209 .1 3.8 100.0 0 12269860 97.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 269640 Missing cases 1.E+07 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P32_6 CUANTOS VOTOS AL PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 115874 .9 88.1 88.1 2 11241 .1 8.5 96.6 4 2960 .0 2.2 98.8 5 1523 .0 1.2 100.0 0 12407902 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 131598 Missing cases 1.E+07 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P32_7 CUANTOS VOTOS AL PDM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 71897 .6 98.4 98.4 2 333 .0 .5 98.8 3 849 .0 1.2 100.0 0 12466421 99.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 73079 Missing cases 1.E+07 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P32_8 CUANTOS VOTOS AL PVEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 72405 .6 52.6 52.6 2 26414 .2 19.2 71.8 3 8694 .1 6.3 78.1 4 8694 .1 6.3 84.4 5 21412 .2 15.6 100.0 0 12401881 98.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 137619 Missing cases 1.E+07 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P32_9 CUANTOS VOTOS AL PT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 48013 .4 56.9 56.9 2 8694 .1 10.3 67.3 5 27604 .2 32.7 100.0 0 12455189 99.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 84311 Missing cases 1.E+07 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P32_10 CUANTOS VOTOS A ABSTENCION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 63369 .5 8.2 8.2 2 37793 .3 4.9 13.2 3 9693 .1 1.3 14.4 4 9339 .1 1.2 15.6 5 647937 5.2 84.4 100.0 0 11771369 93.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 768131 Missing cases 1.E+07 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P32_11 NO SABE CUANTOS VOTOS REPARTIR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 10403 .1 1.1 1.1 2 23308 .2 2.6 3.7 3 8694 .1 1.0 4.7 4 2960 .0 .3 5.0 5 859322 6.9 95.0 100.0 0 11634814 92.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 904686 Missing cases 1.E+07 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P32_12 NO CONTESTO CUANTOS VOTOS REPARTIR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 3729 .0 2.2 2.2 2 1698 .0 1.0 3.3 3 3175 .0 1.9 5.2 4 10217 .1 6.1 11.3 5 147570 1.2 88.7 100.0 0 12373112 98.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 166388 Missing cases 1.E+07 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P33 POR CUAL PARTIDO NUNCA VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 1465492 11.7 11.7 11.7 PRI 2 1607540 12.8 12.8 24.5 PPS 3 859548 6.9 6.9 31.4 PRD 4 2619384 20.9 20.9 52.3 PFCRN 5 449677 3.6 3.6 55.9 PARM 6 280145 2.2 2.2 58.1 PDM 7 307429 2.5 2.5 60.6 PVEM 8 265773 2.1 2.1 62.7 PT 9 425460 3.4 3.4 66.1 NO SABE 10 3342195 26.7 26.7 92.8 NO CONTESTO 11 908164 7.2 7.2 100.0 0 8694 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 8694 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P34 SU OPINION SOBRE EL PDTE SALINAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJORO 1 4826832 38.5 38.5 38.5 SE MANTUVO IGUAL 2 5933665 47.3 47.3 85.8 EMPEORO 3 1007345 8.0 8.0 93.9 NO SABE 4 642720 5.1 5.1 99.0 NO CONTESTO 5 125977 1.0 1.0 100.0 0 2960 .0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 2960 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P35 ACUERDO CON MANERA DE GOBERNAR DE CSG Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 10464807 83.5 83.5 83.5 DESACUERDO 2 1239359 9.9 9.9 93.3 NO SABE 3 559792 4.5 4.5 97.8 NO CONTESTO 4 275542 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P36 SITUACION ECONOMICA ACTUAL DE MEXICO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 7549655 60.2 60.2 60.2 IGUAL 2 2819679 22.5 22.5 82.7 PEOR 3 1672406 13.3 13.3 96.0 NO SABE 4 429263 3.4 3.4 99.5 NO CONTESTO 5 68497 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P37 SITUACION PERSONAL EL AÑO QUE ENTRA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 6330914 50.5 50.5 50.5 IGUAL 2 2411401 19.2 19.2 69.7 PEOR 3 1256588 10.0 10.0 79.7 NO SABE 4 2449514 19.5 19.5 99.3 NO CONTESTO 5 91082 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 6066508 48.4 48.4 48.4 femenino 2 6472992 51.6 51.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 3773310 30.1 30.1 30.1 26-40 2 4743618 37.8 37.8 67.9 41-60 3 2966992 23.7 23.7 91.6 61 + 4 1055580 8.4 8.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INST Institución donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 5325139 42.5 42.5 42.5 gob fed 2 1121627 8.9 8.9 51.4 paraestatal 3 186995 1.5 1.5 52.9 emp priv 4 3344658 26.7 26.7 79.6 negocio prop 5 1405767 11.2 11.2 90.8 independiente 6 1155314 9.2 9.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 3390299 27.0 63.7 63.7 estudiante 2 925141 7.4 17.4 81.0 jubilado 3 450450 3.6 8.5 89.5 desemp 4 438916 3.5 8.2 97.7 otro 5 120332 1.0 2.3 100.0 0 7214361 57.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 5325139 Missing cases 7.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACTIV Rama de actividad económica Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent agric 1 91722 .7 1.3 1.3 industria 2 1245783 9.9 17.3 18.5 comercio 3 2565714 20.5 35.6 54.1 construc 4 432999 3.5 6.0 60.1 educación 5 332456 2.7 4.6 64.7 otros servs 6 2545687 20.3 35.3 100.0 0 5325139 42.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 7214361 Missing cases 5.E+06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUESTO Que puesto ocupa en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario, Patron o 1 530269 4.2 7.4 7.4 Directivo o Func de 2 198330 1.6 2.7 10.1 Contratista o trabaj 3 1301818 10.4 18.0 28.1 Profesionista Indepe 4 250827 2.0 3.5 31.6 Emplea, trabaj, Obre 5 4779237 38.1 66.2 97.9 trabajador sin pago 6 133317 1.1 1.8 99.7 Insuf. especif. 97 8694 .1 .1 99.8 No contesto 98 11869 .1 .2 100.0 0 5325139 42.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 7214361 Missing cases 5.E+06 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 32 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 419076 3.3 3.3 3.3 prim inc 2 1225172 9.8 9.8 13.1 prim comp 3 2078071 16.6 16.6 29.7 sec incom 4 1163444 9.3 9.3 39.0 sec comp 5 2289218 18.3 18.3 57.2 prep incom 6 1369333 10.9 10.9 68.1 prep comp 7 1906585 15.2 15.2 83.3 univ incom 8 1169075 9.3 9.3 92.7 univ comp + 9 919527 7.3 7.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 1725388 13.8 13.8 13.8 1-3 sm 2 4594525 36.6 36.6 50.4 3-5 sm 3 3512823 28.0 28.0 78.4 5-7 sm 4 1618914 12.9 12.9 91.3 10 + SM 6 1087850 8.7 8.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 33 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 CAP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 2358148 18.8 18.8 18.8 2 1742213 13.9 13.9 32.7 3 1972925 15.7 15.7 48.4 4 1234532 9.8 9.8 58.3 5 1686978 13.5 13.5 71.7 6 274894 2.2 2.2 73.9 8 1319311 10.5 10.5 84.4 10 1908875 15.2 15.2 99.7 11 16650 .1 .1 99.8 13 8325 .1 .1 99.9 14 16650 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X30 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 1900074 15.2 15.2 15.2 2 4009730 32.0 32.0 47.1 3 4346330 34.7 34.7 81.8 4 650475 5.2 5.2 87.0 5 563937 4.5 4.5 91.5 6 871584 7.0 7.0 98.4 7 197370 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 34 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P6 ELECC PDTE 94: POR CUAL PARTIDO VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 1324294 10.6 10.6 10.6 PRI 2 7012179 55.9 55.9 66.5 PPS 3 33946 .3 .3 66.8 PRD 4 1992121 15.9 15.9 82.6 PFCRN 5 58106 .5 .5 83.1 PARM 6 22720 .2 .2 83.3 PDM 7 21022 .2 .2 83.5 PT 8 47103 .4 .4 83.8 PVEM 9 60154 .5 .5 84.3 OTRO 10 51380 .4 .4 84.7 NINGUNO 11 645625 5.1 5.1 89.9 NO SABE 12 948382 7.6 7.6 97.4 NO CONTESTO 13 182365 1.5 1.5 98.9 ANULADO 14 139437 1.1 1.1 100.0 0 666 .0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 666 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P38A ELECC PDTE 94: POR CUAL CANDIDATO VOTARI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DFC DEL PAN 1 1306157 10.4 10.4 10.4 LDC DEL PRI 2 6890603 55.0 55.0 65.4 3 674 .0 .0 65.4 CCS DEL PRD 4 2387885 19.0 19.0 84.4 5 8694 .1 .1 84.5 OTRO 10 80469 .6 .6 85.1 NINGUNO 11 631010 5.0 5.0 90.2 NO SABE 12 957122 7.6 7.6 97.8 NO CONTESTO 13 210120 1.7 1.7 99.5 anulados 14 66767 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.3E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 35 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 P38B QUE TAN SEGURO DE RESPUESTA ANTERIOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 278838 2.2 2.3 2.3 2 754319 6.0 6.3 8.6 3 1811156 14.4 15.0 23.6 4 1706693 13.6 14.2 37.8 5 6510214 51.9 54.1 91.8 NO SABE 6 872025 7.0 7.2 99.1 NO CONTESTO 7 110344 .9 .9 100.0 0 495912 4.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 12539500 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.2E+07 Missing cases 495912 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 36 ELECCIONES 1994 II NOV 93 10/22/94 This procedure was completed at 10:44:40