The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 4998 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 6187 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 773 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1 SITUACION DEL PAIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 13241732 30.2 30.2 30.2 IGUAL 2 12620573 28.8 28.8 58.9 PEOR 3 16793223 38.3 38.3 97.2 N/S 4 1045266 2.4 2.4 99.6 N/C 5 174166 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P2 COMO CREE QUE ESTAN LAS COSAS EN EL PAIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUY BIEN 1 1947978 4.4 4.4 4.4 BIEN 2 7787631 17.7 17.7 22.2 REGULAR 3 18965458 43.2 43.2 65.4 MAL 4 10325837 23.5 23.5 89.0 NUY MAL 5 4169134 9.5 9.5 98.5 N/S 6 632319 1.4 1.4 99.9 N/C 7 46604 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P3 SITUACION POLITICA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TRANQUILA 1 10388912 23.7 23.7 23.7 PREOCUPANTE 2 21906916 49.9 49.9 73.6 PELIGROSA 3 8407116 19.2 19.2 92.8 MEJOR QUE ANTES 4 1817107 4.1 4.1 96.9 N/S 5 1056397 2.4 2.4 99.3 N/C 6 298514 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P4 QUE SENSACION LE PROVOCA QUE EL PDTE TER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTRO 10 678210 1.5 1.5 1.5 INDIFERENCIA 11 9223605 21.0 21.0 22.6 INTRANQUILIDAD 12 7737587 17.6 17.6 40.2 GUSTO 13 4224871 9.6 9.6 49.8 MALESTAR 14 1030371 2.3 2.3 52.2 TRANQUILIDAD 15 1740039 4.0 4.0 56.1 ENOJO 16 240343 .5 .5 56.7 TRISTEZA 17 2711799 6.2 6.2 62.9 CONFORMIDAD 18 1806975 4.1 4.1 67.0 ESPERANZA 19 424721 1.0 1.0 68.0 SEGURIDAD 20 229807 .5 .5 68.5 TEMOR 21 1384906 3.2 3.2 71.6 AGRADECIMIENTO 22 98011 .2 .2 71.9 NOSTALGIA 23 358227 .8 .8 72.7 INSUF 97 929481 2.1 2.1 74.8 NO CONTESTO 98 2460057 5.6 5.6 80.4 NO SABE 99 8594507 19.6 19.6 100.0 0 1445 .0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 1445 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 CALIFICACION DE TRABAJO PRESIDENTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXCELENTE 1 3995640 9.1 9.1 9.1 MUY BUENO 2 6013247 13.7 13.7 22.8 BUENO 3 16335354 37.2 37.2 60.0 REGULAR 4 13270961 30.2 30.2 90.3 MALO 5 2608244 5.9 5.9 96.2 MUY MALO 6 427211 1.0 1.0 97.2 PESIMO 7 433099 1.0 1.0 98.2 N/S 8 447902 1.0 1.0 99.2 N/C 9 343304 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P6 CREE QUE EL PAIS HA MEJORADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent HA MEJORADO 1 27891117 63.6 63.6 63.6 SIGUE IGUAL 2 9871152 22.5 22.5 86.1 HA EMPEORADO 3 4845876 11.0 11.0 97.1 N/S 4 976180 2.2 2.2 99.3 N/C 5 290636 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7 LE BENEFICIO O PERJUDICO LO QUE HIZO EL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BENEFICIO 1 12524446 28.5 28.5 28.5 BENEFICIO EN PARTE 2 10620477 24.2 24.2 52.8 NI UNO NI OTRO 3 16518513 37.6 37.6 90.4 PERJUDICO 4 3506066 8.0 8.0 98.4 N/S 5 630974 1.4 1.4 99.8 N/C 6 74485 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8 CREE QUE SALINAS HIZO TODO PARA MEJORAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TODO LO QUE PUDO 1 21919434 50.0 50.0 50.0 LE FALTO ESFORZARSE 2 19447230 44.3 44.3 94.3 N/S 3 2084013 4.7 4.7 99.0 N/C 4 424285 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P9 SITUACION PERSONAL: MEJOR O PEOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 22132150 50.4 50.4 50.4 IGUAL 2 12686004 28.9 28.9 79.4 PEOR 3 7928500 18.1 18.1 97.4 N/S 4 864488 2.0 2.0 99.4 N/C 5 263819 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P10 SITUACION EL ANO QUE VIENE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 18825291 42.9 42.9 42.9 IGUAL 2 7918111 18.0 18.0 61.0 PEOR 3 5181809 11.8 11.8 72.8 N/S 4 11498524 26.2 26.2 99.0 N/C 5 451227 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P11_1 LA DELINCUENCIA AUMENTO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AUMENTO 1 23895884 54.5 54.5 54.5 IGUAL 2 8693737 19.8 19.8 74.3 DISMINUYO 3 8659873 19.7 19.7 94.0 N/S 4 2342054 5.3 5.3 99.4 N/C 5 283412 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P11_2 EL BIENESTAR DE LOS MEXICANOS AUMENTO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AUMENTO 1 17543421 40.0 40.0 40.0 IGUAL 2 13732483 31.3 31.3 71.3 DISMINUYO 3 9885032 22.5 22.5 93.8 N/S 4 2335506 5.3 5.3 99.1 N/C 5 378519 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P11_3 EL BIENESTAR DE SU FAMILIA AUMENTO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AUMENTO 1 18291351 41.7 41.7 41.7 IGUAL 2 16565098 37.8 37.8 79.4 DISMINUYO 3 7518771 17.1 17.1 96.6 N/S 4 1195463 2.7 2.7 99.3 N/C 5 304278 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P11_4 LA ESTABILIDAD Y LA PAZ AUMENTO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AUMENTO 1 13920282 31.7 31.7 31.7 IGUAL 2 10918747 24.9 24.9 56.6 DISMINUYO 3 16424178 37.4 37.4 94.0 N/S 4 2253335 5.1 5.1 99.2 N/C 5 358420 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P11_5 LA CONFIANZA EN EL GOBIERNO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AUMENTO 1 13704257 31.2 31.2 31.2 IGUAL 2 12708513 29.0 29.0 60.2 DISMINUYO 3 15098935 34.4 34.4 94.6 N/S 4 1941099 4.4 4.4 99.0 N/C 5 422158 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P11_6 LA CORRUPCION AUMENTO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AUMENTO 1 21642171 49.3 49.3 49.3 IGUAL 2 10931926 24.9 24.9 74.2 DISMINUYO 3 8005674 18.2 18.2 92.5 N/S 4 2844283 6.5 6.5 99.0 N/C 5 450907 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P11_7 LA LIMPIEZA EN LAS ELECCIONES AUMENTARON Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AUMENTO 1 20326272 46.3 46.3 46.3 IGUAL 2 13172915 30.0 30.0 76.4 DISMINUYO 3 6756623 15.4 15.4 91.8 N/S 4 3173558 7.2 7.2 99.0 N/C 5 445592 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P11_8 LA POBREZA AUMENTO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AUMENTO 1 19478872 44.4 44.4 44.4 IGUAL 2 12832805 29.2 29.2 73.6 DISMINUYO 3 9216187 21.0 21.0 94.7 N/S 4 1945722 4.4 4.4 99.1 N/C 5 401375 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P11_9 EL PRESTIGIO DE MEXICO AUMENTO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AUMENTO 1 20451600 46.6 46.6 46.6 IGUAL 2 11098481 25.3 25.3 71.9 DISMINUYO 3 6916359 15.8 15.8 87.7 N/S 4 4694551 10.7 10.7 98.4 N/C 5 713970 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P12 EN SU OPINION EL GOB DE CSG HIZO MAS O M Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAS 1 33570438 76.5 76.5 76.5 IGUAL 2 5524703 12.6 12.6 89.1 MENOS 3 2216920 5.1 5.1 94.2 N/S 4 1735441 4.0 4.0 98.1 N/C 5 827459 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P13_1 PUEDE MENCIONAR OBRAS DE SALINAS: 1A. OP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTROS 10 232186 .5 .5 .5 ASESINATOS 11 103153 .2 .2 .8 CHIAPAS EZLN 12 102457 .2 .2 1.0 TLC 13 1525947 3.5 3.5 4.5 SOLIDARIDAD 14 5455368 12.4 12.4 16.9 ECONOMIA 15 73448 .2 .2 17.1 PACTO 16 209807 .5 .5 17.6 CAMPO 17 1091434 2.5 2.5 20.0 EDUCACION 18 2226053 5.1 5.1 25.1 REFORMA POLITICA 19 66147 .2 .2 25.3 AYUDA A POBRES 20 69586 .2 .2 25.4 ELECCIONES LIMPIAS 21 43417 .1 .1 25.5 FOTOCREDENCIALIZACIO 22 18666 .0 .0 25.6 MEJORAS SALARIO 23 108028 .2 .2 25.8 RELACIONES EXTERIOR 25 56222 .1 .1 25.9 INDUSTRIA 26 101636 .2 .2 26.2 MONEDA 27 166897 .4 .4 26.6 PROGRESO DEL PAIS 28 95523 .2 .2 26.8 SERVS PUBLICOS 29 1476886 3.4 3.4 30.1 CORRUPCION 30 60730 .1 .1 30.3 NARCOTRAFICO 31 13835 .0 .0 30.3 SEGURIDAD PUBLICA 32 40821 .1 .1 30.4 CARRETERAS 33 12016499 27.4 27.4 57.8 VIVIENDA 34 2098699 4.8 4.8 62.6 PRIVATIZACION 35 119633 .3 .3 62.8 DEUDA EXTERNA 36 53286 .1 .1 63.0 PAVIMENTACION 37 1331653 3.0 3.0 66.0 DRENAJE 38 166490 .4 .4 66.4 PRESAS 39 2155810 4.9 4.9 71.3 ECOLOGIA 40 156494 .4 .4 71.7 CONTAMINACION 41 94014 .2 .2 71.9 HOSPITALES 42 855875 2.0 2.0 73.8 ELECTRIFICACION 43 970259 2.2 2.2 76.0 TRANSPORTE 44 121227 .3 .3 76.3 CENTROS RECREATIVOS 45 58018 .1 .1 76.4 AGUA 46 414929 .9 .9 77.4 APOYO A INDIGENAS 47 6679 .0 .0 77.4 NINGUNO 48 196180 .4 .4 77.8 CERCANIA CON LA GENT 49 18977 .0 .0 77.9 TODO 50 3033 .0 .0 77.9 EMPOBRECER AL PAIS 51 6599 .0 .0 77.9 UNIDAD ENTRE MEXICAN 55 4907 .0 .0 77.9 METRO 56 855752 2.0 2.0 79.9 INSUF 97 47562 .1 .1 80.0 NC 98 1673966 3.8 3.8 83.8 NS 99 7110176 16.2 16.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P13_2 PUEDE MENCIONAR OBRAS DE SALINAS: 2A. OP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTROS 10 292349 .7 1.2 1.2 ASESINATOS 11 15438 .0 .1 1.3 CHIAPAS EZLN 12 12933 .0 .1 1.4 TLC 13 982280 2.2 4.1 5.5 SOLIDARIDAD 14 2424852 5.5 10.2 15.7 ECONOMIA 15 105099 .2 .4 16.2 PACTO 16 284831 .6 1.2 17.4 CAMPO 17 1231832 2.8 5.2 22.6 EDUCACION 18 2536795 5.8 10.7 33.3 REFORMA POLITICA 19 145266 .3 .6 33.9 AYUDA A POBRES 20 84387 .2 .4 34.3 ELECCIONES LIMPIAS 21 80057 .2 .3 34.6 FOTOCREDENCIALIZACIO 22 45961 .1 .2 34.8 MEJORAS SALARIO 23 138419 .3 .6 35.4 RELACION EDO-IGL 24 23618 .1 .1 35.5 RELACIONES EXTERIOR 25 75002 .2 .3 35.8 INDUSTRIA 26 177027 .4 .7 36.6 MONEDA 27 133007 .3 .6 37.1 PROGRESO DEL PAIS 28 92233 .2 .4 37.5 SERVS PUBLICOS 29 911782 2.1 3.9 41.4 CORRUPCION 30 29856 .1 .1 41.5 NARCOTRAFICO 31 54756 .1 .2 41.7 SEGURIDAD PUBLICA 32 89215 .2 .4 42.1 CARRETERAS 33 4500673 10.3 19.0 61.1 VIVIENDA 34 2462249 5.6 10.4 71.5 PRIVATIZACION 35 52001 .1 .2 71.7 DEUDA EXTERNA 36 93351 .2 .4 72.1 PAVIMENTACION 37 799708 1.8 3.4 75.5 DRENAJE 38 187221 .4 .8 76.3 PRESAS 39 1375854 3.1 5.8 82.1 ECOLOGIA 40 256163 .6 1.1 83.2 CONTAMINACION 41 72722 .2 .3 83.5 HOSPITALES 42 892336 2.0 3.8 87.2 ELECTRIFICACION 43 1203887 2.7 5.1 92.3 TRANSPORTE 44 207872 .5 .9 93.2 CENTROS RECREATIVOS 45 125928 .3 .5 93.7 AGUA 46 688889 1.6 2.9 96.6 APOYO A INDIGENAS 47 29474 .1 .1 96.8 CERCANIA CON LA GENT 49 15008 .0 .1 96.8 MIGRACION 53 18482 .0 .1 96.9 UNIDAD ENTRE MEXICAN 55 2673 .0 .0 96.9 METRO 56 692227 1.6 2.9 99.8 NC 98 37770 .1 .2 100.0 0 20193475 46.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2.4E+07 Missing cases 2.E+07 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P13_3 PUEDE MENCIONAR OBRAS DE SALINAS: 3A. OP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTROS 10 118191 .3 1.1 1.1 ASESINATOS 11 27543 .1 .3 1.4 CHIAPAS EZLN 12 13385 .0 .1 1.5 TLC 13 657152 1.5 6.2 7.7 SOLIDARIDAD 14 933766 2.1 8.8 16.5 ECONOMIA 15 82195 .2 .8 17.3 PACTO 16 149503 .3 1.4 18.7 CAMPO 17 707424 1.6 6.7 25.3 EDUCACION 18 1223598 2.8 11.5 36.9 REFORMA POLITICA 19 26075 .1 .2 37.1 AYUDA A POBRES 20 80825 .2 .8 37.9 ELECCIONES LIMPIAS 21 46615 .1 .4 38.3 FOTOCREDENCIALIZACIO 22 20195 .0 .2 38.5 MEJORAS SALARIO 23 164976 .4 1.6 40.1 RELACION EDO-IGL 24 12003 .0 .1 40.2 RELACIONES EXTERIOR 25 49507 .1 .5 40.6 INDUSTRIA 26 119618 .3 1.1 41.8 MONEDA 27 109548 .2 1.0 42.8 PROGRESO DEL PAIS 28 8083 .0 .1 42.9 SERVS PUBLICOS 29 556720 1.3 5.2 48.1 CORRUPCION 30 25773 .1 .2 48.4 NARCOTRAFICO 31 28278 .1 .3 48.6 SEGURIDAD PUBLICA 32 47152 .1 .4 49.1 CARRETERAS 33 1352448 3.1 12.7 61.8 VIVIENDA 34 928464 2.1 8.7 70.6 PRIVATIZACION 35 87867 .2 .8 71.4 DEUDA EXTERNA 36 46131 .1 .4 71.8 PAVIMENTACION 37 465621 1.1 4.4 76.2 DRENAJE 38 71114 .2 .7 76.9 PRESAS 39 363556 .8 3.4 80.3 ECOLOGIA 40 139783 .3 1.3 81.6 CONTAMINACION 41 154468 .4 1.5 83.1 HOSPITALES 42 482780 1.1 4.5 87.6 ELECTRIFICACION 43 600264 1.4 5.7 93.3 TRANSPORTE 44 122357 .3 1.2 94.4 CENTROS RECREATIVOS 45 68740 .2 .6 95.1 AGUA 46 252733 .6 2.4 97.5 APOYO A INDIGENAS 47 35196 .1 .3 97.8 MIGRACION 53 43233 .1 .4 98.2 LIBERTAD DE EXPRESIO 54 11437 .0 .1 98.3 UNIDAD ENTRE MEXICAN 55 1588 .0 .0 98.3 METRO 56 139332 .3 1.3 99.6 NC 98 38573 .1 .4 100.0 0 33261151 75.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.1E+07 Missing cases 3.E+07 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P14_1 CREE QUE LA EDUCACION MEJORO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJORO 1 29108134 66.3 66.4 66.4 IGUAL 2 9294966 21.2 21.2 87.6 EMPEORO 3 3829724 8.7 8.7 96.3 N/S 4 1380872 3.1 3.1 99.4 N/C 5 241914 .6 .6 100.0 0 19351 .0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 19351 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P14_2 CREE QUE LA COSNTRUCCION DE VIVIENDAS ME Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJORO 1 30027151 68.4 68.5 68.5 IGUAL 2 9682297 22.1 22.1 90.5 EMPEORO 3 2155033 4.9 4.9 95.5 N/S 4 1763313 4.0 4.0 99.5 N/C 5 227816 .5 .5 100.0 0 19351 .0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 19351 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P14_3 CREE QUE LA ATENCION A LA SALUD MEJORO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJORO 1 28334504 64.6 64.6 64.6 IGUAL 2 10668360 24.3 24.3 88.9 EMPEORO 3 3225284 7.4 7.4 96.2 N/S 4 1625910 3.7 3.7 100.0 N/C 5 20903 .0 .0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P14_4 CREE QUE LA DISTRIBUCION DE LA ELECTRICI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJORO 1 31733078 72.3 72.3 72.3 IGUAL 2 8500434 19.4 19.4 91.7 EMPEORO 3 1537322 3.5 3.5 95.2 N/S 4 2052798 4.7 4.7 99.9 N/C 5 51330 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P14_5 CREE QUE LA CONSTRUCCION DE CARRETERAS M Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJORO 1 37449534 85.4 85.4 85.4 IGUAL 2 3969545 9.0 9.0 94.4 EMPEORO 3 1052708 2.4 2.4 96.8 N/S 4 1303948 3.0 3.0 99.8 N/C 5 99226 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P14_6 CREE QUE LA ATENCION AL MEDIO AMBIENTE M Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJORO 1 25524086 58.2 58.2 58.2 IGUAL 2 10477917 23.9 23.9 82.1 EMPEORO 3 4896911 11.2 11.2 93.2 N/S 4 2704518 6.2 6.2 99.4 N/C 5 271530 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P15 SITUACION ECONOMICA DEL PAIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUY BUENA 1 2287051 5.2 5.2 5.2 BUENA 2 12293383 28.0 28.0 33.2 REGULAR 3 19607406 44.7 44.7 77.9 MALA 4 7054107 16.1 16.1 94.0 MUY MALA 5 1385953 3.2 3.2 97.2 N/S 6 1007644 2.3 2.3 99.5 N/C 7 239417 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P16 SITUACION PERSONAL O DE SU FAMILIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUY BUENA 1 2464218 5.6 5.6 5.6 BUENA 2 12920704 29.4 29.4 35.1 REGULAR 3 20012981 45.6 45.6 80.7 MALA 4 6616307 15.1 15.1 95.8 MUY MALA 5 1010087 2.3 2.3 98.1 N/S 6 619376 1.4 1.4 99.5 N/C 7 231288 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P17 LOS CAMBIOS QUE REALIZO SALINAS FUERON D Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHA IMPORTANCIA 1 25703666 58.6 58.6 58.6 POCA IMPORTANCIA 2 12272380 28.0 28.0 86.6 NO TUVIERON IMP 3 3613308 8.2 8.2 94.8 N/S 4 1756439 4.0 4.0 98.8 5 529168 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P18_1 SATISFECHO: DISMINUIR EL ALZA DE PRECIOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHO 1 16105235 36.7 36.7 36.7 POCO 2 19034338 43.4 43.4 80.1 NADA 3 6757786 15.4 15.4 95.5 N/S 4 1809961 4.1 4.1 99.6 N/C 5 167641 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P18_2 SATISFECHO: CREAR NUEVOS EMPLEOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHO 1 15084496 34.4 34.4 34.4 POCO 2 18619251 42.4 42.4 76.8 NADA 3 8087664 18.4 18.4 95.3 N/S 4 1799852 4.1 4.1 99.4 N/C 5 283697 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P18_3 SATISFECHO: COMBATIR LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHO 1 14757053 33.6 33.6 33.6 POCO 2 18124263 41.3 41.3 74.9 NADA 3 9210338 21.0 21.0 95.9 N/S 4 1620679 3.7 3.7 99.6 N/C 5 162629 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P18_4 SATISFECHO: COMBATIR LA CONTAMINACION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHO 1 16355880 37.3 37.3 37.3 POCO 2 17415115 39.7 39.7 77.0 NADA 3 7443885 17.0 17.0 93.9 N/S 4 2428585 5.5 5.5 99.5 N/C 5 231495 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P18_5 SATISFECHO: COMBATIR EL NARCOTRAFICO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHO 1 15667207 35.7 35.7 35.7 POCO 2 16158979 36.8 36.8 72.5 NADA 3 9334583 21.3 21.3 93.8 N/S 4 2388762 5.4 5.4 99.3 N/C 5 325430 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P18_6 SATISFECHO: INVESTIGAR EL ASESINATO DE L Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHO 1 9630745 22.0 22.0 22.0 POCO 2 15398729 35.1 35.1 57.0 NADA 3 15429866 35.2 35.2 92.2 N/S 4 2954482 6.7 6.7 98.9 N/C 5 461139 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P18_7 SATISFECHO: TERMINAR EL CONFLICTO EN CHI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHO 1 11114954 25.3 25.3 25.3 POCO 2 16125798 36.8 36.8 62.1 NADA 3 13638459 31.1 31.1 93.2 N/S 4 2654307 6.0 6.0 99.2 N/C 5 341443 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P18_8 SATISFECHO: ORGANIZAR ELECCIONES LIMPIAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHO 1 18789295 42.8 42.8 42.8 POCO 2 14767782 33.7 33.7 76.5 NADA 3 7574155 17.3 17.3 93.7 N/S 4 2432914 5.5 5.5 99.3 N/C 5 310815 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P18_9 SATISFECHO: COMBATIR LA DELINCUENCIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHO 1 14582762 33.2 33.2 33.2 POCO 2 16743957 38.2 38.2 71.4 NADA 3 10038187 22.9 22.9 94.3 N/S 4 2239832 5.1 5.1 99.4 N/C 5 270222 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P19 EL PRESIDENTE GOBERNO PARA TODOS LOS MEX Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent A TODOS 1 27607010 62.9 62.9 62.9 FAVORECIO ALGUN GRUP 2 12443094 28.4 28.4 91.3 N/S 3 2680226 6.1 6.1 97.4 N/C 4 1144631 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P19_1 A CUAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTROS 10 277415 .6 2.2 2.2 EMPRESARIOS 11 1457210 3.3 11.7 13.9 A SU GENTE 12 1584781 3.6 12.7 26.7 POLITICOS 13 385307 .9 3.1 29.8 PRI 14 1237282 2.8 9.9 39.7 A SU FAMILIA 16 112855 .3 .9 40.6 A SI MISMO 17 76073 .2 .6 41.2 AL GOBIERNO 18 192149 .4 1.5 42.8 A LOS RICOS 19 3370924 7.7 27.1 69.9 BUROCRATAS 20 301126 .7 2.4 72.3 DIPUTADOS 21 83733 .2 .7 73.0 POBRES 22 233880 .5 1.9 74.8 NINGUNO 23 11437 .0 .1 74.9 A LOS BANQUEROS 24 33212 .1 .3 75.2 A LOS DE SOLIDARIDAD 25 82166 .2 .7 75.9 A LOS EXTRANJEROS 26 227057 .5 1.8 77.7 INSUF 97 228152 .5 1.8 79.5 NO CONTESTO 98 972099 2.2 7.8 87.3 NO SABE 99 1576235 3.6 12.7 100.0 0 31431867 71.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.2E+07 Missing cases 3.E+07 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P20 A FAVOR DEL TLC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent A FAVOR 1 21540416 49.1 49.1 49.1 DA IGUAL 2 8642501 19.7 19.7 68.8 EN CONTRA 3 9314952 21.2 21.2 90.0 N/S 4 4024832 9.2 9.2 99.2 N/C 5 352260 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P21 COMO HA VISTO QUE LE HA IDO A MEXICO CO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 9951012 22.7 22.7 22.7 PEOR 2 6570836 15.0 15.0 37.7 TODAVIA NO HAY CAMBI 3 22016614 50.2 50.2 87.8 N/S 4 5113885 11.7 11.7 99.5 N/C 5 222614 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P22 SATISFECHO CON LA FORMA QUE SE ESTAN DAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SATISFECHO 1 16486258 37.6 37.6 37.6 SATIFFECHO EN PARTE 2 12351724 28.2 28.2 65.7 INSASTIFECHO 3 12878336 29.4 29.4 95.1 N/S 4 1574999 3.6 3.6 98.7 N/C 5 583644 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23_1 EVALUACION CSG: CERCANIA CON GENTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BIEN 1 27238819 62.1 62.1 62.1 REGULAR 2 11380550 25.9 25.9 88.0 MAL 3 3843775 8.8 8.8 96.8 N/S 4 1242590 2.8 2.8 99.6 N/C 5 169227 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P23_2 EVALUACION CSG: HONRADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BIEN 1 19700695 44.9 44.9 44.9 REGULAR 2 12351962 28.2 28.2 73.1 MAL 3 6306990 14.4 14.4 87.4 N/S 4 5176559 11.8 11.8 99.2 N/C 5 338755 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23_3 EVALUACION CSG: PREOCUPADO POR LOS POBRE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BIEN 1 21299199 48.5 48.5 48.5 REGULAR 2 12302326 28.0 28.0 76.6 MAL 3 8114442 18.5 18.5 95.1 N/S 4 1928671 4.4 4.4 99.5 N/C 5 230322 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23_4 EVALUACION CSG: PREOCUPADO POR LOS RICOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BIEN 1 22013204 50.2 50.2 50.2 REGULAR 2 10747496 24.5 24.5 74.7 MAL 3 5989659 13.7 13.7 88.3 N/S 4 4724428 10.8 10.8 99.1 N/C 5 400174 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P23_5 EVALUACION CSG: TOLERANTE CON QUIENES LO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BIEN 1 21847004 49.8 49.8 49.8 REGULAR 2 12004638 27.4 27.4 77.2 MAL 3 4330772 9.9 9.9 87.0 N/S 4 5157501 11.8 11.8 98.8 N/C 5 535046 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23_6 EVALUACION CSG: DURO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BIEN 1 18783158 42.8 42.8 42.8 REGULAR 2 13783115 31.4 31.4 74.2 MAL 3 6116286 13.9 13.9 88.2 N/S 4 4676856 10.7 10.7 98.8 N/C 5 515547 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23_7 EVALUACION CSG: TRABAJADOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BIEN 1 29653059 67.6 67.6 67.6 REGULAR 2 9271785 21.1 21.1 88.7 MAL 3 2792299 6.4 6.4 95.1 N/S 4 1872634 4.3 4.3 99.4 N/C 5 285185 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P23_8 EVALUACION CSG: CUMPLIDOR EN SUS PROMESA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BIEN 1 22967110 52.3 52.3 52.3 REGULAR 2 12663645 28.9 28.9 81.2 MAL 3 5698094 13.0 13.0 94.2 N/S 4 2076940 4.7 4.7 98.9 N/C 5 469173 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 32 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P24 CUAL FUE EL MAYOR LOGRO DEL PDTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTROS 10 537911 1.2 1.2 1.2 ASESINATOS 11 136632 .3 .3 1.5 CHIAPAS EZLN 12 410822 .9 .9 2.5 TLC 13 4723361 10.8 10.8 13.2 SOLIDARIDAD 14 5992739 13.7 13.7 26.9 ECONOMIA 15 1208827 2.8 2.8 29.7 PACTO 16 2101576 4.8 4.8 34.4 CAMPO 17 873746 2.0 2.0 36.4 EDUCACION 18 851866 1.9 1.9 38.4 REFORMA POLITICA 19 163490 .4 .4 38.7 AYUDA A POBRES 20 1194782 2.7 2.7 41.5 ELECCIONES LIMPIAS 21 414128 .9 .9 42.4 FOTOCREDENCIALIZACIO 22 65113 .1 .1 42.6 MEJORAS SALARIO 23 397157 .9 .9 43.5 RELACION EDO-IGL 24 80629 .2 .2 43.7 RELACIONES EXTERIOR 25 507180 1.2 1.2 44.8 INDUSTRIA 26 95710 .2 .2 45.0 MONEDA 27 125950 .3 .3 45.3 PROGRESO DEL PAIS 28 1258899 2.9 2.9 48.2 SERVS PUBLICOS 29 588102 1.3 1.3 49.5 CORRUPCION 30 149317 .3 .3 49.9 NARCOTRAFICO 31 351753 .8 .8 50.7 SEGURIDAD PUBLICA 32 34932 .1 .1 50.7 CARRETERAS 33 2283342 5.2 5.2 55.9 VIVIENDA 34 1322821 3.0 3.0 59.0 PRIVATIZACION 35 96193 .2 .2 59.2 DEUDA EXTERNA 36 692861 1.6 1.6 60.8 PAVIMENTACION 37 144518 .3 .3 61.1 DRENAJE 38 13452 .0 .0 61.1 PRESAS 39 103530 .2 .2 61.4 ECOLOGIA 40 112989 .3 .3 61.6 CONTAMINACION 41 102973 .2 .2 61.9 HOSPITALES 42 202162 .5 .5 62.3 ELECTRIFICACION 43 201339 .5 .5 62.8 TRANSPORTE 44 25602 .1 .1 62.8 CENTROS RECREATIVOS 45 27908 .1 .1 62.9 AGUA 46 33192 .1 .1 63.0 APOYO A INDIGENAS 47 22524 .1 .1 63.0 NINGUNO 48 1420170 3.2 3.2 66.3 CERCANIA CON LA GENT 49 907316 2.1 2.1 68.3 TODO 50 558738 1.3 1.3 69.6 EMPOBRECER AL PAIS 51 233705 .5 .5 70.1 TERMINAR CON EL SIND 52 13260 .0 .0 70.2 MIGRACION 53 1445 .0 .0 70.2 LIBERTAD DE EXPRESIO 54 26811 .1 .1 70.2 UNIDAD ENTRE MEXICAN 55 447342 1.0 1.0 71.2 METRO 56 86822 .2 .2 71.4 INSUF 97 184361 .4 .4 71.9 NC 98 2054696 4.7 4.7 76.5 NS 99 10290269 23.5 23.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 33 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P24 CUAL FUE EL MAYOR LOGRO DEL PDTE Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P25 Y CUAL FUE EL MAYOR FRACASO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTRO 10 829026 1.9 1.9 1.9 ASESINATOS 11 3124878 7.1 7.1 9.0 CHIAPAS EZLN 12 6228092 14.2 14.2 23.2 TLC 13 1770215 4.0 4.0 27.2 CRISI ECONOMICA 14 844014 1.9 1.9 29.2 NO APOYO AL CAMPO 15 286190 .7 .7 29.8 EDUCACION 16 101425 .2 .2 30.1 REFORMA POLITICA 17 495998 1.1 1.1 31.2 AUMENTAR POBREZA 18 848161 1.9 1.9 33.1 ELECCIONES 19 96250 .2 .2 33.3 DESEMPLEO 20 992345 2.3 2.3 35.6 VIOLENCIA 21 756023 1.7 1.7 37.3 RELACION EDO-IGL 22 97167 .2 .2 37.5 RELACIONES CON EL EX 23 158836 .4 .4 37.9 NO PROGRESA EL PAIS 24 43957 .1 .1 38.0 CORRUPCION 25 815761 1.9 1.9 39.9 SEGURIDAD PUBLICA 26 274029 .6 .6 40.5 NARCOTRAFICO 27 364940 .8 .8 41.3 VIVIENDA 28 2014 .0 .0 41.3 PRIVATIZACION 29 274828 .6 .6 41.9 DEUDA 30 82830 .2 .2 42.1 NINGUNO 31 2546864 5.8 5.8 47.9 CONTAMINACION 32 262930 .6 .6 48.5 NO REELEGIRSE 33 309547 .7 .7 49.2 MAL GOBIERNO 34 1421142 3.2 3.2 52.5 TODO 35 307552 .7 .7 53.2 SOBREPOBLACION 36 31674 .1 .1 53.3 NO ATENDER A INDIGEN 37 48566 .1 .1 53.4 APOYO A RICOS 38 26579 .1 .1 53.4 NUEVO PESO 39 280295 .6 .6 54.1 INSUF 97 315355 .7 .7 54.8 NO CONTESTO 98 2647572 6.0 6.0 60.8 NO SABE 99 17187575 39.2 39.2 100.0 0 2329 .0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 2329 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 34 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P26_1 SIENTE QUE: USTED ES MAS O MENOS LIBRE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAS 1 23473199 53.5 53.5 53.5 IGUAL 2 15371080 35.0 35.0 88.5 MENOS 3 3436968 7.8 7.8 96.4 N/S 4 1363073 3.1 3.1 99.5 N/C 5 230641 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P26_2 SIENTE QUE: EL GOBIERNO ESCUCHA MAS O ME Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAS 1 20317589 46.3 46.3 46.3 IGUAL 2 14223611 32.4 32.4 78.7 MENOS 3 6556652 14.9 14.9 93.7 N/S 4 2446705 5.6 5.6 99.2 N/C 5 330403 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P26_3 SIENTE QUE: TIENE OPORTUNIDADES P/MEJORA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAS 1 24205672 55.2 55.2 55.2 IGUAL 2 11372765 25.9 25.9 81.1 MENOS 3 6153922 14.0 14.0 95.1 N/S 4 1902988 4.3 4.3 99.5 N/C 5 239614 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 35 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P27_1 ACEPTA MAS O MENOS QUE EL PRI GOBIERNA A Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAS 1 18157195 41.4 41.4 41.4 IGUAL 2 12224158 27.9 27.9 69.2 MENOS 3 11268643 25.7 25.7 94.9 N/S 4 1901425 4.3 4.3 99.3 N/C 5 323540 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P27_2 CREE QUE MEXICO ESTA CERCA DE SER UN PAI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAS 1 22875797 52.1 52.1 52.1 IGUAL 2 9818448 22.4 22.4 74.5 MENOS 3 7842414 17.9 17.9 92.4 N/S 4 3069877 7.0 7.0 99.4 N/C 5 268425 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P27_3 TIENE MAS O MENOS ORGULLO DE SER MEXICAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAS 1 30992549 70.6 70.6 70.6 IGUAL 2 10413090 23.7 23.7 94.4 MENOS 3 1462834 3.3 3.3 97.7 N/S 4 843018 1.9 1.9 99.6 N/C 5 163470 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 36 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P27_4 CREE QUE EXISTE MAS IGUALDAD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAS 1 20104357 45.8 45.8 45.8 IGUAL 2 12682951 28.9 28.9 74.7 MENOS 3 8763030 20.0 20.0 94.7 N/S 4 2126049 4.8 4.8 99.5 N/C 5 198574 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P27_5 CREE QUE MEXICO ES MAS O MENOS DEPENDIEN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAS 1 21340060 48.6 48.6 48.6 IGUAL 2 9421950 21.5 21.5 70.1 MENOS 3 9284900 21.2 21.2 91.3 N/S 4 3352991 7.6 7.6 98.9 N/C 5 475059 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P28_1 ACUERDO VENTA DE BANCOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 15448367 35.2 35.2 35.2 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 7287712 16.6 16.6 51.8 DESACUERDO 3 16604084 37.8 37.8 89.7 N/S 4 4205803 9.6 9.6 99.3 N/C 5 328994 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 37 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P28_2 ACUERDO CAMBIO DE MONEDA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 16206358 36.9 36.9 36.9 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 8192311 18.7 18.7 55.6 DESACUERDO 3 18041002 41.1 41.1 96.7 N/S 4 1321260 3.0 3.0 99.7 N/C 5 114030 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P28_3 ACUERDO MAYOR ENTRADA DE EMPRESAS EXTRAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 17350251 39.5 39.5 39.5 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 10472426 23.9 23.9 63.4 DESACUERDO 3 13053637 29.8 29.8 93.2 N/S 4 2747462 6.3 6.3 99.4 N/C 5 251185 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P28_4 TERMINO EL REPARTO DE TIERRAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 19124816 43.6 43.6 43.6 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 8198351 18.7 18.7 62.3 DESACUERDO 3 13106731 29.9 29.9 92.1 N/S 4 3279914 7.5 7.5 99.6 N/C 5 165149 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 38 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P28_5 MAYOR RELACION CON EU Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 20024464 45.6 45.6 45.6 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 9208337 21.0 21.0 66.6 DESACUERDO 3 11585114 26.4 26.4 93.0 N/S 4 2752611 6.3 6.3 99.3 N/C 5 304436 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P28_6 CAMBIO DE LIBROS DE TEXTO PARA PRIMARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 26143376 59.6 59.6 59.6 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 5997722 13.7 13.7 73.3 DESACUERDO 3 8291182 18.9 18.9 92.2 N/S 4 3130363 7.1 7.1 99.3 N/C 5 312319 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P28_7 ACUERDO SOLIDARIDAD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 35190509 80.2 80.2 80.2 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 5371977 12.2 12.2 92.5 DESACUERDO 3 2524045 5.8 5.8 98.2 N/S 4 617586 1.4 1.4 99.6 N/C 5 170844 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 39 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P28_8 ACUERDO DERECHO DE LOS SACERDOTES PARA V Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 26310642 60.0 60.0 60.0 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 5854811 13.3 13.3 73.3 DESACUERDO 3 9901937 22.6 22.6 95.9 N/S 4 1527231 3.5 3.5 99.4 N/C 5 280341 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P28_9 ACUERDO REFORMA ELECTORAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 35744866 81.5 81.5 81.5 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 4180158 9.5 9.5 91.0 DESACUERDO 3 2473997 5.6 5.6 96.6 N/S 4 1219979 2.8 2.8 99.4 N/C 5 255962 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 40 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P29 PROBLEMA MAS GRAVE DEL PAIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTRO 10 1165849 2.7 2.7 2.7 ECONOMIA 11 3757432 8.6 8.6 11.2 CHIAPAS EZLN 12 2757097 6.3 6.3 17.5 DESEMPLEO 13 4463685 10.2 10.2 27.7 DEUDA EXTERNA 14 870418 2.0 2.0 29.7 INFLACION 15 874835 2.0 2.0 31.7 PROBLEMAS POLITICOS 16 1052761 2.4 2.4 34.1 TODO 17 116187 .3 .3 34.3 NINGUNO 18 182964 .4 .4 34.7 ASESINATO DE POLITIC 19 480465 1.1 1.1 35.8 CORRUPCION 20 2307487 5.3 5.3 41.1 POBREZA 21 6200583 14.1 14.1 55.2 INSEGURIDAD 22 4570573 10.4 10.4 65.6 PROBLEMAS SOCIALES 23 812834 1.9 1.9 67.5 NARCOTRAFICO 24 2056396 4.7 4.7 72.2 GOBIERNO 25 914765 2.1 2.1 74.3 PRI 26 141024 .3 .3 74.6 TIERRA Y CAMPO 27 305297 .7 .7 75.3 TLC 28 279788 .6 .6 75.9 CONTAMINACION 29 1417102 3.2 3.2 79.2 EDUCACION 30 594736 1.4 1.4 80.5 SALUD 31 119753 .3 .3 80.8 INJUSTICIA 32 620371 1.4 1.4 82.2 SALARIOS 33 417677 1.0 1.0 83.1 SERVS PUBLICOS 34 100788 .2 .2 83.4 INSUF 97 322466 .7 .7 84.1 NO CONTESTO 98 1513639 3.4 3.4 87.6 NO SABE 99 5457991 12.4 12.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P30 CREE QUE EL GOB HA HECHO TODO LO POSIBLE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent HA HECHO TODO 1 14460137 33.0 33.0 33.0 NO HA HECHO NADA 2 25665606 58.5 58.5 91.5 N/S 3 3412474 7.8 7.8 99.2 N/C 4 336744 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 41 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P31 CREE QUE SALINAS TOMO LAS MEDIDAS ADECUA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ADECUADAS 1 18051155 41.1 41.1 41.1 ALGUNAS ADECUADAS 2 15612857 35.6 35.6 76.7 INADECUADAS 3 7542139 17.2 17.2 93.9 N/S 4 2358464 5.4 5.4 99.3 N/C 5 310346 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P32 CREE QUE EL PACTO ESTA DISMINUYENDO LA I Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 22730551 51.8 51.8 51.8 NO 2 15392910 35.1 35.1 86.9 N/S 3 5301027 12.1 12.1 99.0 N/C 4 450473 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P33 CREE QUE EL PACTO ESTA AYUDANDO A CONTRO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 27197094 62.0 62.0 62.0 NO 2 11288278 25.7 25.7 87.7 N/S 3 4908381 11.2 11.2 98.9 N/C 4 481208 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 42 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P34 CREE QUE EL PROXIMO GOBIERNO DEBE MANTEN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 29513819 67.3 67.3 67.3 NO 2 7462259 17.0 17.0 84.3 N/S 3 6216822 14.2 14.2 98.4 N/C 4 682061 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P35 DODE UBICARIA AL PRESIDENTE SALINAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ENTRE MEJORES 1 25744090 58.7 58.7 58.7 ENTRE REGULARES 2 13986262 31.9 31.9 90.6 ENTRE PEORES 3 2801178 6.4 6.4 96.9 N/S 4 1053042 2.4 2.4 99.3 N/C 5 290390 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P36 SIMPATIA ELECCIONES DE 1994 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP 1 24544521 55.9 55.9 55.9 CCS 2 4908785 11.2 11.2 67.1 DFC 3 8040903 18.3 18.3 85.5 NINGUNO 4 4347385 9.9 9.9 95.4 N/S 5 1139477 2.6 2.6 98.0 N/C 6 893890 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 43 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P37 EN SU OPINION EL GOBIERNO HIZO MAS POR E Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAS 1 31323737 71.4 71.4 71.4 IGUAL 2 6377911 14.5 14.5 85.9 MENOS 3 4464181 10.2 10.2 96.1 N/S 4 1330493 3.0 3.0 99.1 N/C 5 378640 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P38 ESTE GOBIERNO HIZO MAS POR LOS POBRES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAS 1 27871599 63.5 63.5 63.5 IGUAL 2 8225050 18.7 18.7 82.3 MENOS 3 6364327 14.5 14.5 96.8 N/S 4 1053446 2.4 2.4 99.2 N/C 5 360540 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P39 CUAL FRASE SE ACERCA MAS A LO QUE UD PIE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTRO COMO SALINAS 1 21850516 49.8 49.8 49.8 QUE BUENO QUE ACABA 2 5741350 13.1 13.1 62.9 TODOS CASI IGUALES 3 12393747 28.2 28.2 91.1 N/S 4 2774404 6.3 6.3 97.5 N/C 5 1114943 2.5 2.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 44 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 P40 CALIFICACION DEL PRESIDENTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 0 586457 1.3 1.3 1.3 1 1 45150 .1 .1 1.4 2 2 291263 .7 .7 2.1 3 3 499197 1.1 1.1 3.2 4 4 691966 1.6 1.6 4.8 5 5 2395490 5.5 5.5 10.3 6 6 3930724 9.0 9.0 19.2 7 7 6590999 15.0 15.0 34.3 8 8 12378300 28.2 28.2 62.5 9 9 7708158 17.6 17.6 80.0 10 10 6287803 14.3 14.3 94.4 N/S 11 2041722 4.7 4.7 99.0 N/C 12 427731 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P41 ACUERDO O DESACUERDO MANERA DE GOBERNAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 33659200 76.7 76.7 76.7 DESACUERDO 2 7933963 18.1 18.1 94.8 N/S 3 1633173 3.7 3.7 98.5 N/C 4 648626 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 45 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 22570419 51.4 51.4 51.4 femenino 2 21304542 48.6 48.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 12235965 27.9 27.9 27.9 26-40 2 17735078 40.4 40.4 68.3 41-60 3 10673962 24.3 24.3 92.6 61 + 4 3229956 7.4 7.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INST Institucion donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 19225447 43.8 43.8 43.8 gob fed 2 3953673 9.0 9.0 52.8 paraestatal 3 661422 1.5 1.5 54.3 emp priv 4 9223566 21.0 21.0 75.4 negocio prop 5 4497263 10.3 10.3 85.6 independiente 6 6313591 14.4 14.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 46 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 12137225 27.7 63.1 63.1 estudiante 2 4008066 9.1 20.8 84.0 jubilado 3 1173607 2.7 6.1 90.1 desemp 4 1475006 3.4 7.7 97.8 otro 5 431543 1.0 2.2 100.0 0 24649515 56.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1.9E+07 Missing cases 2.E+07 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACTIV Rama de actividad economica Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent agric 1 3609213 8.2 14.6 14.6 industria 2 3406008 7.8 13.8 28.5 comercio 3 7023632 16.0 28.5 57.0 construc 4 2276912 5.2 9.2 66.2 educacion 5 1727669 3.9 7.0 73.2 otros servs 6 6606081 15.1 26.8 100.0 0 19225447 43.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2.5E+07 Missing cases 2.E+07 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 47 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 PUESTO Que puesto ocupa en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario, Patron o 1 1863179 4.2 7.6 7.6 Directivo o Func de 2 1144823 2.6 4.6 12.2 Contratista o trabaj 3 7444387 17.0 30.2 42.4 Profesionista Indepe 4 1104869 2.5 4.5 46.9 Emplea, trabaj, Obre 5 12589455 28.7 51.1 98.0 trabajador sin pago 6 481543 1.1 2.0 99.9 No contesto 98 21258 .0 .1 100.0 0 19225447 43.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2.5E+07 Missing cases 2.E+07 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 2119738 4.8 4.8 4.8 prim inc 2 6792810 15.5 15.5 20.3 prim comp 3 7450057 17.0 17.0 37.3 sec incom 4 3431705 7.8 7.8 45.1 sec comp 5 6536793 14.9 14.9 60.0 prep incom 6 4428622 10.1 10.1 70.1 prep comp 7 5407296 12.3 12.3 82.4 univ incom 8 4382110 10.0 10.0 92.4 univ comp + 9 3325830 7.6 7.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 48 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 6899921 15.7 15.7 15.7 1-3 sm 2 16525967 37.7 37.7 53.4 3-5 sm 3 10435091 23.8 23.8 77.2 5-7 sm 4 5870536 13.4 13.4 90.6 7-10 5 2302974 5.2 5.2 95.8 10 + SM 6 1840472 4.2 4.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TEL TIENE TELEFONO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 18921722 43.1 43.1 43.1 2 24881460 56.7 56.7 99.8 3 71779 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 43874961 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4.4E+07 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 49 EVALUACION NAL NOV 1994 11/11/94 This procedure was completed at 21:06:03