The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 550 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 6528 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 816 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1 SITUACION ECONOMICA COMUNIDAD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 30 5.6 5.6 5.6 Igual 2 41 7.5 7.5 13.1 Peor 3 462 84.7 84.9 98.1 No sabe 4 7 1.3 1.3 99.4 No contestó 5 4 .6 .6 100.0 0 2 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 544 Missing cases 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 SATISFECHO CON NIVEL DE VIDA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 212 38.8 38.9 38.9 Si parte 2 67 12.3 12.4 51.3 No 3 261 47.9 48.0 99.2 No contestó 4 4 .8 .8 100.0 0 1 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 545 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 5 ROLL OVER (1) JALISCO 01/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/2/95 FRECUENCIAS PONDERADAS EN JAL10295.FRE PEST6 QUIEN LE INSPIRA CONFIANZA... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 178 32.6 32.6 32.6 A Cárdenas J 2 212 38.8 38.8 71.4 Mario Saucedo 3 16 2.9 2.9 74.3 Ninguno 4 44 8.0 8.0 82.3 No sabe 5 72 13.2 13.2 95.5 No contestó 6 25 4.5 4.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 546 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4 SITUACION ECON PROX AÑO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 228 41.8 41.9 41.9 Igual 2 49 9.1 9.1 51.0 Peor 3 173 31.7 31.8 82.7 No sabe 4 80 14.6 14.6 97.3 No contestó 5 14 2.6 2.7 100.0 0 1 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 545 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 6 ROLL OVER (1) JALISCO 01/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/2/95 FRECUENCIAS PONDERADAS EN JAL10295.FRE P5 QUIEN PARA PROX GOBERNADOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 173 31.6 31.7 31.7 A Cárdenas J 2 206 37.6 37.7 69.4 Mario Saucedo 3 16 3.0 3.0 72.4 Ninguno 4 17 3.2 3.2 75.5 No sabe 5 98 17.9 17.9 93.4 No contestó 6 36 6.6 6.6 100.0 0 1 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 545 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6 SITUACION ECONOMICA FAMILIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 94 17.3 17.3 17.3 Igual 2 113 20.7 20.8 38.1 Peor 3 324 59.3 59.4 97.5 No sabe 4 11 2.0 2.0 99.5 No contestó 5 3 .5 .5 100.0 0 1 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 545 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 ROLL OVER (1) JALISCO 01/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/2/95 FRECUENCIAS PONDERADAS EN JAL10295.FRE PELE7 SI HOY ELECC JAL POR QUIEN VOTA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Eugenio Ruiz PRI 1 173 31.7 31.9 31.9 A Cárdenas J PAN 2 218 39.9 40.2 72.1 M Saucedo PRD 3 23 4.2 4.2 76.3 Otro 4 2 .3 .3 76.6 Ninguno 5 30 5.4 5.5 82.0 No sabe 6 62 11.3 11.4 93.5 No contestó 7 35 6.5 6.5 100.0 0 4 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 542 Missing cases 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7_1 ACUERDO CON..Pte de la República Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Acuerdo 1 200 36.7 36.7 36.7 Desacuerdo 2 194 35.5 35.5 72.2 No sabe 3 113 20.7 20.7 93.0 No contestó 4 38 7.0 7.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 546 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7_2 ACUERDO CON..Gobernador Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Acuerdo 1 260 47.6 47.7 47.7 Desacuerdo 2 195 35.6 35.7 83.4 No sabe 3 57 10.5 10.5 93.9 No contestó 4 33 6.0 6.1 100.0 0 2 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 544 Missing cases 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 ROLL OVER (1) JALISCO 01/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/2/95 FRECUENCIAS PONDERADAS EN JAL10295.FRE P7_3 ACUERDO CON..Pdte. Municipal Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Acuerdo 1 258 47.3 47.3 47.3 Desacuerdo 2 194 35.6 35.6 82.9 No sabe 3 57 10.5 10.5 93.4 No contestó 4 36 6.6 6.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 546 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL1 VOTOS A..Eugenio Ruiz O PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 50 9.2 17.9 17.9 DOS 2 71 12.9 25.2 43.1 TRES 3 57 10.4 20.2 63.3 CUATRO 4 10 1.8 3.5 66.7 CINCO 5 93 17.1 33.3 100.0 0 266 48.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 280 Missing cases 266 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL2 VOTOS A..Alberto Cárdenas PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 29 5.3 9.4 9.4 DOS 2 84 15.5 27.7 37.2 TRES 3 59 10.9 19.5 56.7 CUATRO 4 19 3.5 6.2 62.9 CINCO 5 113 20.7 37.1 100.0 0 242 44.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 304 Missing cases 242 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 ROLL OVER (1) JALISCO 01/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/2/95 FRECUENCIAS PONDERADAS EN JAL10295.FRE PBOL3 VOTOS A..Mario Saucedo PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 71 12.9 72.5 72.5 DOS 2 14 2.6 14.3 86.8 TRES 3 5 .9 5.2 92.1 CINCO 5 8 1.4 7.9 100.0 0 449 82.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 97 Missing cases 449 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL4 VOTOS A..Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 20 3.6 57.3 57.3 DOS 2 7 1.3 21.3 78.5 TRES 3 3 .5 7.6 86.1 CUATRO 4 1 .2 3.5 89.7 CINCO 5 4 .7 10.3 100.0 0 511 93.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 35 Missing cases 511 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL5 VOTOS A..A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DOS 2 1 .2 4.1 4.1 CUATRO 4 1 .2 3.6 7.7 CINCO 5 24 4.4 92.3 100.0 0 520 95.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 26 Missing cases 520 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 ROLL OVER (1) JALISCO 01/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/2/95 FRECUENCIAS PONDERADAS EN JAL10295.FRE PBOL6 VOTOS A..No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .3 1.9 1.9 DOS 2 0 .1 .5 2.4 CUATRO 4 2 .3 2.2 4.6 CINCO 5 67 12.3 95.4 100.0 0 475 87.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 71 Missing cases 475 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL7 VOTOS A..No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 0 .1 1.3 1.3 CUATRO 4 2 .3 5.1 6.4 CINCO 5 30 5.5 93.6 100.0 0 514 94.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 32 Missing cases 514 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR1 QUIEN ES..Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 163 29.9 29.9 29.9 Alberto Cardenas 2 152 27.8 27.8 57.7 Mario Saucedo 3 20 3.7 3.7 61.4 Ninguno 4 13 2.3 2.3 63.8 No Sabe/No C 5 198 36.2 36.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 546 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 ROLL OVER (1) JALISCO 01/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/2/95 FRECUENCIAS PONDERADAS EN JAL10295.FRE PATR2 QUIEN ES..Más experiencia Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 245 44.9 45.0 45.0 Alberto Cardenas 2 125 22.9 23.0 68.0 Mario Saucedo 3 9 1.7 1.7 69.7 Ninguno 4 20 3.6 3.6 73.3 No Sabe/No C 5 145 26.6 26.7 100.0 0 1 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 545 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR3 QUIEN ES..Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 227 41.6 41.7 41.7 Alberto Cardenas 2 139 25.4 25.4 67.2 Mario Saucedo 3 15 2.7 2.7 69.9 Ninguno 4 12 2.1 2.1 72.0 No Sabe/No C 5 153 27.9 28.0 100.0 0 2 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 545 Missing cases 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 ROLL OVER (1) JALISCO 01/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/2/95 FRECUENCIAS PONDERADAS EN JAL10295.FRE PATR4 QUIEN ES..Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 207 37.9 38.0 38.0 Alberto Cardenas 2 154 28.2 28.2 66.2 Mario Saucedo 3 19 3.4 3.4 69.6 Ninguno 4 25 4.6 4.6 74.3 No Sabe/No C 5 140 25.7 25.7 100.0 0 1 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 545 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR5 QUIEN ES..Mejor opción para edo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 167 30.5 30.6 30.6 Alberto Cardenas 2 207 37.9 38.0 68.5 Mario Saucedo 3 17 3.1 3.1 71.6 Ninguno 4 16 2.9 2.9 74.5 No Sabe/No C 5 139 25.5 25.5 100.0 0 1 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 545 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 ROLL OVER (1) JALISCO 01/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/2/95 FRECUENCIAS PONDERADAS EN JAL10295.FRE PATR6 QUIEN ES..Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 107 19.6 19.7 19.7 Alberto Cardenas 2 154 28.2 28.3 48.0 Mario Saucedo 3 16 2.9 2.9 50.9 Ninguno 4 36 6.6 6.6 57.5 No Sabe/No C 5 232 42.5 42.5 100.0 0 1 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 545 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR7 QUIEN ES..Más personalidad Gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 192 35.2 35.3 35.3 Alberto Cardenas 2 168 30.7 30.7 66.0 Mario Saucedo 3 11 2.0 2.0 68.0 Ninguno 4 19 3.4 3.4 71.5 No Sabe/No C 5 156 28.5 28.5 100.0 0 1 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 545 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 ROLL OVER (1) JALISCO 01/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/2/95 FRECUENCIAS PONDERADAS EN JAL10295.FRE PATR8 QUIEN ES..Puede resolver pobreza Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 135 24.8 24.8 24.8 Alberto Cardenas 2 143 26.2 26.2 51.0 Mario Saucedo 3 14 2.5 2.5 53.5 Ninguno 4 71 12.9 12.9 66.5 No Sabe/No C 5 183 33.5 33.5 100.0 0 1 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 545 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR9 QUIEN ES..Habla mas con verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 134 24.5 24.7 24.7 Alberto Cardenas 2 170 31.1 31.2 55.9 Mario Saucedo 3 16 2.9 2.9 58.8 Ninguno 4 51 9.3 9.4 68.2 No Sabe/No C 5 173 31.7 31.8 100.0 0 3 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 543 Missing cases 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8 QUE NECESITA EL PROXIMO GOB.. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Exper-Intelig 1 191 34.9 34.9 34.9 Opción cambio 2 286 52.3 52.3 87.2 Ninguna 3 12 2.2 2.2 89.4 No sabe/No C 4 58 10.6 10.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 546 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 ROLL OVER (1) JALISCO 01/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/2/95 FRECUENCIAS PONDERADAS EN JAL10295.FRE SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 260 47.6 47.6 47.6 femenino 2 286 52.4 52.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 546 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 156 28.6 28.6 28.6 26-40 2 193 35.3 35.3 63.9 41-60 3 135 24.7 24.7 88.6 61 + 4 62 11.3 11.3 99.9 5 0 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 546 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INST Institución donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 243 44.5 44.5 44.5 gob fed 2 47 8.7 8.7 53.2 paraestatal 3 14 2.5 2.5 55.7 emp priv 4 128 23.5 23.5 79.3 negocio prop 5 40 7.3 7.3 86.5 independiente 6 74 13.5 13.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 546 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 ROLL OVER (1) JALISCO 01/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/2/95 FRECUENCIAS PONDERADAS EN JAL10295.FRE OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 170 31.2 70.0 70.0 estudiante 2 40 7.4 16.6 86.7 jubilado 3 11 2.1 4.7 91.4 desemp 4 12 2.1 4.7 96.1 otro 5 9 1.7 3.9 100.0 0 303 55.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 243 Missing cases 303 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACTIV Rama de actividad económica Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent agric 1 6 1.1 2.0 2.0 industria 2 38 7.0 12.7 14.7 comercio 3 86 15.7 28.3 43.0 construc 4 9 1.7 3.0 46.0 educación 5 25 4.7 8.4 54.4 otros servs 6 138 25.2 45.6 100.0 0 244 44.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 302 Missing cases 244 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 ROLL OVER (1) JALISCO 01/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/2/95 FRECUENCIAS PONDERADAS EN JAL10295.FRE PUESTO Que puesto ocupa en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario, Patron o 1 18 3.3 5.9 5.9 Directivo o Func de 2 7 1.3 2.3 8.2 Contratista o trabaj 3 74 13.5 24.3 32.5 Profesionista Indepe 4 14 2.6 4.8 37.3 Emplea, trabaj, Obre 5 188 34.4 62.0 99.3 trabajador sin pago 6 2 .3 .6 99.9 Otro 7 0 .1 .1 100.0 0 243 44.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 303 Missing cases 243 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 13 2.4 2.4 2.4 prim inc 2 48 8.9 8.9 11.3 prim comp 3 92 16.8 16.8 28.1 sec incom 4 21 3.9 3.9 32.0 sec comp 5 132 24.2 24.2 56.2 prep incom 6 40 7.3 7.3 63.5 prep comp 7 79 14.5 14.5 78.0 univ incom 8 36 6.6 6.6 84.6 univ comp + 9 84 15.4 15.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 546 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 ROLL OVER (1) JALISCO 01/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/2/95 FRECUENCIAS PONDERADAS EN JAL10295.FRE INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 42 7.6 7.6 7.6 1-3 sm 2 135 24.7 24.7 32.3 3-5 sm 3 109 20.0 20.0 52.4 5-7 sm 4 40 7.4 7.4 59.7 7-10 5 35 6.3 6.3 66.1 10 + SM 6 89 16.3 16.3 82.4 7 96 17.6 17.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 546 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 546 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 ROLL OVER (1) JALISCO 01/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/2/95 FRECUENCIAS PONDERADAS EN JAL10295.FRE This procedure was completed at 19:35:42