/box='.|.' /width=132/length=60 /eject=OFF /scren= ON /more=OFF /include= on /echo=OFF. The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 732 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 8548 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 1068 Value Labels for each Variable. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 6 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE P1 SITUACION ECONOMICA PAIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 129 17.7 17.7 17.7 Igual 2 103 14.0 14.1 31.7 Peor 3 479 65.4 65.5 97.3 No sabe 4 19 2.5 2.5 99.8 No contestó 5 1 .2 .2 100.0 . 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 731 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 ENTERO DE ACONTECIMIENTO POLITICO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Sí 1 253 34.6 34.8 34.8 No 2 459 62.6 63.0 97.9 Nc 3 16 2.1 2.1 100.0 . 5 .6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 727 Missing cases 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2_1 QUE OCURRIO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Debate IFE 1 194 26.6 77.0 77.0 Otro 2 20 2.7 7.9 85.0 Ns-nc 3 38 5.2 15.0 100.0 0 479 65.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 253 Missing cases 479 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE P3 VIO DEBATE ENTRE IFE VS PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Sí 1 67 9.2 12.5 12.5 No 2 467 63.8 86.9 99.5 Ns 3 3 .4 .5 100.0 0 194 26.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 538 Missing cases 194 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4 QUIEN TUVO RAZON EN EL PADRON IFE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Carlos Almada 1 105 14.4 40.2 40.2 Samuel del Villar 2 60 8.2 23.0 63.2 Ninguno de los dos 3 29 4.0 11.1 74.4 No sabe 4 58 7.9 22.2 96.5 No contestó 5 9 1.2 3.5 100.0 0 470 64.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 262 Missing cases 470 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 CONFIABLE EL PADRON ELECTORAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Sí es confiable 1 357 48.8 48.8 48.8 Confiable parte 2 63 8.6 8.6 57.4 No es confiable 3 219 30.0 30.0 87.4 No sabe 4 88 12.1 12.1 99.4 No contestó 5 4 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 732 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE P6 PADRON ESTA BIEN HECHO? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Está bien hecho 1 444 60.7 60.7 60.7 En parte (voluntario 2 89 12.2 12.2 72.9 Está mal hecho 3 139 18.9 18.9 91.9 No sabe 4 52 7.2 7.2 99.0 No contestó 5 7 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 732 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7 PADRON HECHO CON TRANPA..? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Sí 1 236 32.2 32.2 32.2 Sí en parte 2 41 5.6 5.6 37.8 No 3 365 49.9 49.9 87.7 No sabe 4 88 12.0 12.0 99.8 No contest ó 5 2 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 732 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE P7_1 COMO CUALES TRAMPAS.. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Alterar el padrón 1 24 3.2 8.6 8.6 Personas inexistntes 2 21 2.9 7.7 16.3 Doble credencial 3 22 3.1 8.2 24.5 Robar votos 4 66 9.1 24.2 48.7 Duplican nombres 5 11 1.6 4.2 52.9 Anotan muertos 6 10 1.3 3.6 56.5 No entreg credencial 7 5 .7 1.8 58.3 Rasurar el padrón 8 5 .7 1.8 60.1 Otro 9 52 7.1 19.0 79.1 No sabe 10 49 6.7 18.0 97.1 No contestó 11 8 1.1 2.9 100.0 . 3 .4 Missing 0 455 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 274 Missing cases 458 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P8 LE IMPORTA QUIEN GANE ELECCION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Sí 1 539 73.7 73.7 73.7 En parte 2 36 4.9 4.9 78.5 No 3 141 19.3 19.3 97.9 No sabe 4 14 1.9 1.9 99.8 No contestó 5 2 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 732 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE P9 CON CREDENCIAL PUEDE EXISTIR FRAUDE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Sí posibe fraude 1 175 23.9 24.0 24.0 Es más difícil hacer 2 134 18.3 18.3 42.3 No es posible fraude 3 374 51.1 51.1 93.4 No sabe 4 44 6.0 6.0 99.4 No contestó 5 5 .6 .6 100.0 . 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 731 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9_1 COMO PUEDE HABER FRAUDE EN PADRON Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent En el conteo de voto 1 22 3.0 12.6 12.6 Credenciales falsas 2 46 6.3 26.5 39.1 Presionando gente 3 10 1.4 6.0 45.1 Votando varias veces 4 14 1.9 8.0 53.1 Por computadora 5 2 .3 1.3 54.5 No aparezcan votante 6 6 .8 3.3 57.7 Que voten los muerto 7 10 1.4 5.8 63.5 Otro 8 14 1.9 7.9 71.5 No sabe 9 45 6.2 25.9 97.4 No contestó 10 5 .6 2.6 100.0 0 557 76.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 175 Missing cases 557 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE P10 ACUERDO PTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent De acuerdo 1 394 53.9 53.9 53.9 De acuerdo en parte 2 158 21.6 21.6 75.5 En desacuerdo 3 154 21.0 21.0 96.5 No sabe 4 15 2.1 2.1 98.6 No contestó 5 11 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 732 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT1_A VOTOS A..CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 72 9.8 54.9 54.9 DOS 2 28 3.9 21.7 76.7 TRES 3 19 2.6 14.6 91.3 CUATRO 4 2 .3 1.5 92.8 CINCO 5 9 1.3 7.2 100.0 . 585 80.0 Missing 0 16 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 131 Missing cases 601 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE PVOT2_A VOTOS A..EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 56 7.6 21.7 21.7 DOS 2 69 9.4 27.1 48.8 TRES 3 51 7.0 20.1 68.9 CUATRO 4 16 2.2 6.3 75.2 CINCO 5 63 8.6 24.8 100.0 . 471 64.3 Missing 0 6 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 255 Missing cases 477 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT3_A VOTOS A..DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 60 8.2 24.7 24.7 DOS 2 59 8.0 24.1 48.8 TRES 3 52 7.1 21.4 70.2 CUATRO 4 13 1.7 5.2 75.5 CINCO 5 60 8.1 24.5 100.0 . 483 66.0 Missing 0 6 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 243 Missing cases 489 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE PVOT4_A VOTOS A..MLT del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .1 42.0 42.0 DOS 2 1 .2 58.0 100.0 . 725 99.0 Missing 0 4 .6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 729 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT5_A VOTOS A..RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DOS 2 1 .1 100.0 100.0 . 729 99.7 Missing 0 2 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 731 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT6_A VOTOS A..CS del (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 19 2.6 64.8 64.8 DOS 2 5 .7 16.6 81.4 TRES 3 2 .3 6.2 87.6 CINCO 5 4 .5 12.4 100.0 . 698 95.4 Missing 0 4 .6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 30 Missing cases 702 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE PVOT7_A VOTOS A..JGT del (PVEM) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 8 1.1 63.7 63.7 DOS 2 4 .5 29.5 93.2 CINCO 5 1 .1 6.8 100.0 . 717 97.9 Missing 0 3 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 13 Missing cases 719 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT8_A VOTOS A..APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .1 100.0 100.0 . 729 99.6 Missing 0 2 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 731 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT9_A VOTOS A..PEM del UNO(PDM) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .1 51.5 51.5 DOS 2 1 .1 48.5 100.0 . 729 99.5 Missing 0 2 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 730 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE PVOT10_A VOTOS A..Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .1 38.0 38.0 TRES 3 1 .2 62.0 100.0 . 728 99.4 Missing 0 2 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 730 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT11_A VOTOS A..A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .1 6.1 6.1 DOS 2 1 .1 6.2 12.4 CINCO 5 12 1.7 87.6 100.0 . 715 97.7 Missing 0 3 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 14 Missing cases 718 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT12_A VOTOS A..No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DOS 2 3 .4 4.7 4.7 TRES 3 1 .1 1.4 6.1 CINCO 5 57 7.7 93.9 100.0 . 669 91.4 Missing 0 3 .4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 60 Missing cases 672 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE PVOT13_A VOTOS A..No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .2 7.0 7.0 DOS 2 1 .1 4.1 11.1 TRES 3 1 .1 3.9 14.9 CINCO 5 18 2.5 85.1 100.0 . 706 96.4 Missing 0 5 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 21 Missing cases 711 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT1_B VOTOS A..CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 53 7.3 68.1 68.1 DOS 2 16 2.2 21.0 89.1 TRES 3 2 .3 2.5 91.6 CUATRO 4 1 .1 1.4 93.0 CINCO 5 5 .7 7.0 100.0 . 645 88.2 Missing 0 9 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 78 Missing cases 654 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE PVOT2_B VOTOS A..EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 39 5.4 22.7 22.7 DOS 2 44 6.0 25.6 48.3 TRES 3 22 3.0 12.6 60.9 CUATRO 4 7 .9 4.0 64.9 CINCO 5 61 8.3 35.1 100.0 . 557 76.1 Missing 0 2 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 173 Missing cases 559 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT3_B VOTOS A..DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 33 4.6 21.1 21.1 DOS 2 41 5.6 25.9 47.1 TRES 3 44 6.0 28.0 75.1 CUATRO 4 5 .6 3.0 78.1 CINCO 5 35 4.7 21.9 100.0 . 573 78.2 Missing 0 2 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 158 Missing cases 574 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4_B VOTOS A..MLT del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 4 .6 100.0 100.0 . 727 99.3 Missing 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 728 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE PVOT5_B VOTOS A..RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 3 .5 100.0 100.0 . 729 99.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 729 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT6_B VOTOS A..CS del (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 10 1.4 45.9 45.9 DOS 2 6 .8 25.3 71.2 TRES 3 1 .1 3.9 75.1 CINCO 5 6 .8 24.9 100.0 . 710 97.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 22 Missing cases 710 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7_B VOTOS A..JGT del (PVEM) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 3 .4 38.3 38.3 DOS 2 3 .4 37.2 75.5 TRES 3 1 .1 13.2 88.8 CINCO 5 1 .1 11.2 100.0 . 724 98.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 8 Missing cases 724 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE PVOT8_B VOTOS A..APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .1 51.1 51.1 CINCO 5 1 .1 48.9 100.0 . 729 99.6 Missing 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 730 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT9_B VOTOS A..PEM del UNO(PDM) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 732 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 732 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10_B VOTOS A..Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .1 20.9 20.9 DOS 2 4 .5 79.1 100.0 . 726 99.2 Missing 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 5 Missing cases 727 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE PVOT11_B VOTOS A..A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DOS 2 1 .1 8.7 8.7 CINCO 5 10 1.4 91.3 100.0 . 721 98.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 11 Missing cases 721 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT12_B VOTOS A..No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DOS 2 1 .2 3.3 3.3 CINCO 5 40 5.5 96.7 100.0 . 686 93.7 Missing 0 4 .6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 42 Missing cases 690 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13_B VOTOS A..No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 7 1.0 100.0 100.0 . 724 98.9 Missing 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 7 Missing cases 725 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE PVOT1 VOTOS A..CCS del PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 125 17.1 59.8 59.8 DOS 2 45 6.1 21.5 81.3 TRES 3 21 2.9 10.1 91.4 CUATRO 4 3 .4 1.5 92.9 CINCO 5 15 2.0 7.1 100.0 0 523 71.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 209 Missing cases 523 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT2 VOTOS A..EZP del PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 95 12.9 22.1 22.1 DOS 2 113 15.5 26.5 48.6 TRES 3 73 10.0 17.1 65.7 CUATRO 4 23 3.2 5.4 71.1 CINCO 5 124 16.9 28.9 100.0 0 304 41.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 428 Missing cases 304 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE PVOT3 VOTOS A..DFC del PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 93 12.8 23.3 23.3 DOS 2 99 13.6 24.8 48.1 TRES 3 96 13.1 24.0 72.2 CUATRO 4 17 2.4 4.3 76.5 CINCO 5 94 12.9 23.5 100.0 0 331 45.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 401 Missing cases 331 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT4 VOTOS A..MLT del PPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 5 .7 78.2 78.2 DOS 2 1 .2 21.8 100.0 0 725 99.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 7 Missing cases 725 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT5 VOTOS A..RAT del PFCRN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 3 .5 79.7 79.7 DOS 2 1 .1 20.3 100.0 0 728 99.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 728 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE PVOT6 VOTOS A..CS del (PT) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 29 4.0 56.7 56.7 DOS 2 11 1.4 20.3 77.0 TRES 3 3 .4 5.3 82.3 CINCO 5 9 1.3 17.7 100.0 0 680 92.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 52 Missing cases 680 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT7 VOTOS A..JGT del (PVEM) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 11 1.5 53.8 53.8 DOS 2 7 .9 32.5 86.3 TRES 3 1 .1 5.1 91.5 CINCO 5 2 .2 8.5 100.0 0 711 97.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 21 Missing cases 711 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT8 VOTOS A..APT del PARM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 .3 67.6 67.6 CINCO 5 1 .1 32.4 100.0 0 729 99.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 729 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE PVOT9 VOTOS A..PEM del UNO(PDM) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .1 51.5 51.5 DOS 2 1 .1 48.5 100.0 0 730 99.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 730 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT10 VOTOS A..Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 .3 26.8 26.8 DOS 2 4 .5 52.1 78.8 TRES 3 1 .2 21.2 100.0 0 725 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 7 Missing cases 725 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT11 VOTOS A..A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .1 3.4 3.4 DOS 2 2 .3 7.3 10.7 CINCO 5 22 3.1 89.3 100.0 0 707 96.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 25 Missing cases 707 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE PVOT12 VOTOS A..No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DOS 2 4 .6 4.1 4.1 TRES 3 1 .1 .8 5.0 CINCO 5 97 13.2 95.0 100.0 0 630 86.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 102 Missing cases 630 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT13 VOTOS A..No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 1 .2 5.3 5.3 DOS 2 1 .1 3.0 8.3 TRES 3 1 .1 2.9 11.2 CINCO 5 25 3.4 88.8 100.0 0 704 96.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 28 Missing cases 704 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 306 41.8 41.9 41.9 CCS del PRD 2 61 8.4 8.4 50.3 DFC del PAN 3 243 33.2 33.2 83.5 Otro 4 6 .8 .8 84.3 Por ninguno 5 25 3.4 3.4 87.7 No sabe 6 55 7.5 7.5 95.2 No contestó 7 35 4.8 4.8 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 731 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE PELE_A SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 187 25.5 42.6 42.6 CCS del PRD 2 38 5.1 8.6 51.2 DFC del PAN 3 143 19.6 32.7 84.0 Otro 4 5 .7 1.1 85.1 Por ninguno 5 12 1.7 2.8 87.9 No sabe 6 34 4.6 7.7 95.6 No contestó 7 19 2.6 4.4 100.0 . 294 40.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 438 Missing cases 294 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE_B SI HOY ELECC POR CUAL VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EZP del PRI 1 119 16.3 40.8 40.8 CCS del PRD 2 24 3.2 8.1 48.9 DFC del PAN 3 99 13.6 33.9 82.8 Otro 4 1 .1 .4 83.2 Por ninguno 5 13 1.7 4.4 87.6 No sabe 6 21 2.8 7.1 94.7 No contestó 7 16 2.1 5.3 100.0 . 439 60.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 293 Missing cases 439 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 352 48.0 48.0 48.0 femenino 2 380 52.0 52.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 732 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 218 29.8 29.8 29.8 26-40 2 268 36.6 36.6 66.3 41-60 3 173 23.7 23.7 90.0 61 + 4 73 10.0 10.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 732 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INST Institución donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 329 45.0 45.0 45.0 gob fed 2 77 10.5 10.5 55.5 paraestatal 3 15 2.0 2.0 57.5 emp priv 4 171 23.4 23.4 80.9 negocio prop 5 62 8.4 8.4 89.3 independiente 6 77 10.5 10.5 99.9 7 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 732 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 208 28.4 63.1 63.1 estudiante 2 85 11.6 25.7 88.9 jubilado 3 24 3.3 7.4 96.2 desemp 4 8 1.1 2.4 98.7 otro 5 4 .6 1.3 100.0 0 403 55.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 329 Missing cases 403 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACTIV Rama de actividad económica Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent agric 1 5 .7 1.3 1.3 industria 2 54 7.3 13.3 14.7 comercio 3 72 9.9 17.9 32.6 construc 4 16 2.1 3.9 36.5 educación 5 40 5.4 9.9 46.3 otros servs 6 215 29.4 53.4 99.8 7 1 .1 .2 100.0 0 329 45.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 403 Missing cases 329 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE PUESTO Que puesto ocupa en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario, Patron o 1 29 3.9 7.2 7.2 Directivo o Func de 2 26 3.6 6.5 13.7 Contratista o trabaj 3 78 10.6 19.3 33.0 Profesionista Indepe 4 24 3.3 6.0 39.0 Emplea, trabaj, Obre 5 242 33.1 60.3 99.3 trabajador sin pago 6 1 .1 .2 99.6 Otro 7 2 .2 .4 100.0 . 1 .1 Missing 0 329 45.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 402 Missing cases 330 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 12 1.7 1.7 1.7 prim inc 2 29 4.0 4.0 5.7 prim comp 3 122 16.7 16.8 22.5 sec incom 4 21 2.9 2.9 25.4 sec comp 5 160 21.8 21.8 47.2 prep incom 6 53 7.2 7.2 54.4 prep comp 7 121 16.5 16.5 70.9 univ incom 8 73 10.0 10.0 80.9 univ comp + 9 139 19.0 19.1 100.0 . 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 731 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 51 6.9 7.0 7.0 1-3 sm 2 196 26.8 26.8 33.8 3-5 sm 3 105 14.4 14.4 48.2 5-7 sm 4 62 8.4 8.5 56.7 7-10 5 62 8.4 8.4 65.1 10 + SM 6 119 16.3 16.3 81.4 7 136 18.6 18.6 100.0 . 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 732 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 731 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 DEBATE POST IFE VS PRD 31/MAY/94 TELEFONICA 5/31/94 FRECUENCIAS EN DEB70594.FRE This procedure was completed at 21:32:09 End of Include file.