The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 556 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 9150 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 1143 Value Labels for each Variable. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 4 DEBATE CCS 5/25/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS EN (DEB10597) FRECPOND.LST P1 ESTA VIENDO TELEVISION O ESCUCHANDO RADI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 539 97.0 97.0 97.0 NO 2 16 3.0 3.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 556 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1_1 ALGUIEN QUE ESTE VIENDO TELEVISION O ESC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 14 2.4 82.5 82.5 NO 2 3 .5 17.5 100.0 0 539 97.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 16 Missing cases 539 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 QUE PROGRAMA ESTA VIENDO O ESCUCHANDO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EL DEBATE 1 375 67.4 100.0 100.0 0 181 32.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 375 Missing cases 181 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 5 DEBATE CCS 5/25/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS EN (DEB10597) FRECPOND.LST P2A QUE PROGRAMA ESTA VIENDO O ESCUCHANDO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Otro 1 192 34.5 99.0 99.0 Nc 2 2 .4 1.0 100.0 0 362 65.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 194 Missing cases 362 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P3 POR CUAL MEDIO ESTA VIENDO O ESCUCHANDO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent POR TELEVISION 1 363 65.3 96.8 96.8 POR RADIO 2 11 2.0 3.0 99.8 N/C 3 1 .2 .2 100.0 0 181 32.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 375 Missing cases 181 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P3A POR CUAL MEDIO VERA O ESCUCHARA EL DEBAT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent POR TELEVISION 1 146 26.3 80.8 80.8 POR RADIO 2 8 1.5 4.5 85.2 Por ninguno 3 21 3.7 11.4 96.6 N/C 4 6 1.1 3.4 100.0 0 375 67.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 181 Missing cases 375 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 6 DEBATE CCS 5/25/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS EN (DEB10597) FRECPOND.LST P4_1 QUIEN PARECE: MAS CLARO AL HABLAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ALFREDO DEL MAZO 1 117 21.1 34.8 34.8 CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 2 144 25.9 42.7 77.4 NINGUNO 3 47 8.4 13.9 91.3 N/S N/C 4 29 5.3 8.7 100.0 0 218 39.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 337 Missing cases 218 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4_2 QUIEN PARECE: MAS PERSONALIDAD PARA GOB Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ALFREDO DEL MAZO 1 141 25.4 41.9 41.9 CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 2 118 21.1 34.8 76.7 NINGUNO 3 55 9.9 16.4 93.1 N/S N/C 4 23 4.2 6.9 100.0 0 218 39.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 337 Missing cases 218 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4_3 QUIEN PARECE: CONOCE MAS LOS PROBLEMAS D Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ALFREDO DEL MAZO 1 96 17.3 28.5 28.5 CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 2 133 23.9 39.3 67.9 NINGUNO 3 47 8.4 13.9 81.8 N/S N/C 4 62 11.1 18.2 100.0 0 218 39.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 337 Missing cases 218 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 DEBATE CCS 5/25/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS EN (DEB10597) FRECPOND.LST P4_4 QUIEN PARECE: MAS SINCERO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ALFREDO DEL MAZO 1 86 15.4 25.4 25.4 CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 2 146 26.3 43.3 68.7 NINGUNO 3 70 12.6 20.7 89.4 N/S N/C 4 36 6.5 10.6 100.0 0 218 39.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 337 Missing cases 218 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4_5 QUIEN PARECE: CON MAS EXPERIENCIA PARA G Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ALFREDO DEL MAZO 1 126 22.6 37.2 37.2 CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 2 124 22.2 36.6 73.9 NINGUNO 3 34 6.1 10.1 83.9 N/S N/C 4 54 9.8 16.1 100.0 0 218 39.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 337 Missing cases 218 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4_6 QUIEN PARECE: GARANTIZA UNA CIUDAD MAS S Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ALFREDO DEL MAZO 1 100 18.0 29.6 29.6 CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 2 121 21.7 35.8 65.4 NINGUNO 3 71 12.7 20.9 86.4 N/S N/C 4 46 8.3 13.6 100.0 0 218 39.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 337 Missing cases 218 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 DEBATE CCS 5/25/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS EN (DEB10597) FRECPOND.LST P4_7 QUIEN PARECE: SE VE SEGURO DE SI MISMO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ALFREDO DEL MAZO 1 121 21.8 35.9 35.9 CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 2 162 29.1 48.0 83.8 NINGUNO 3 29 5.2 8.5 92.3 N/S N/C 4 26 4.6 7.7 100.0 0 218 39.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 337 Missing cases 218 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4_8 QUIEN PARECE: PUEDE RESOLVER PROBS DE EM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ALFREDO DEL MAZO 1 90 16.2 26.7 26.7 CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 2 119 21.4 35.3 62.1 NINGUNO 3 88 15.9 26.1 88.2 N/S N/C 4 40 7.2 11.8 100.0 0 218 39.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 337 Missing cases 218 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5_1 QUIEN PARECE: MAS CLARO AL HABLAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ALFREDO DEL MAZO 1 74 13.2 33.7 33.7 CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 2 85 15.2 38.8 72.4 NINGUNO 3 35 6.4 16.2 88.6 N/S N/C 4 25 4.5 11.4 100.0 0 337 60.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 218 Missing cases 337 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 DEBATE CCS 5/25/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS EN (DEB10597) FRECPOND.LST P5_2 QUIEN PARECE: MAS PERSONALIDAD PARA GOB Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ALFREDO DEL MAZO 1 90 16.2 41.2 41.2 CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 2 77 13.8 35.0 76.2 NINGUNO 3 35 6.4 16.2 92.5 N/S N/C 4 16 3.0 7.5 100.0 0 337 60.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 218 Missing cases 337 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5_3 QUIEN PARECE: CONOCE MAS LOS PROBLEMAS D Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ALFREDO DEL MAZO 1 62 11.2 28.6 28.6 CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 2 104 18.7 47.7 76.3 NINGUNO 3 24 4.3 10.8 87.1 N/S N/C 4 28 5.1 12.9 100.0 0 337 60.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 218 Missing cases 337 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5_4 QUIEN PARECE: MAS SINCERO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ALFREDO DEL MAZO 1 55 9.8 25.0 25.0 CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 2 86 15.6 39.6 64.5 NINGUNO 3 51 9.1 23.2 87.7 N/S N/C 4 27 4.8 12.3 100.0 0 337 60.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 218 Missing cases 337 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 DEBATE CCS 5/25/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS EN (DEB10597) FRECPOND.LST P5_5 QUIEN PARECE: CON MAS EXPERIENCIA PARA G Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ALFREDO DEL MAZO 1 76 13.7 34.8 34.8 CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 2 98 17.6 44.7 79.5 NINGUNO 3 25 4.5 11.5 91.0 N/S N/C 4 20 3.5 9.0 100.0 0 337 60.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 218 Missing cases 337 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5_6 QUIEN PARECE: GARANTIZA UNA CIUDAD MAS S Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ALFREDO DEL MAZO 1 65 11.8 29.9 29.9 CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 2 82 14.8 37.7 67.7 NINGUNO 3 53 9.6 24.5 92.1 N/S N/C 4 17 3.1 7.9 100.0 0 337 60.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 218 Missing cases 337 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5_7 QUIEN PARECE: SE VE SEGURO DE SI MISMO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ALFREDO DEL MAZO 1 92 16.6 42.3 42.3 CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 2 88 15.8 40.3 82.6 NINGUNO 3 16 2.8 7.2 89.8 N/S N/C 4 22 4.0 10.2 100.0 0 337 60.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 218 Missing cases 337 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 DEBATE CCS 5/25/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS EN (DEB10597) FRECPOND.LST P5_8 QUIEN PARECE: PUEDE RESOLVER PROBS DE EM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ALFREDO DEL MAZO 1 62 11.2 28.6 28.6 CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 2 77 13.9 35.3 63.9 NINGUNO 3 49 8.9 22.6 86.5 N/S N/C 4 30 5.3 13.5 100.0 0 337 60.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 218 Missing cases 337 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6 QUIEN CREE QUE VA A GANAR EL DEBATE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 1 90 16.1 41.0 41.0 ALFREDO DEL MAZO PRI 2 65 11.7 29.7 70.6 NINGUNO 3 19 3.4 8.6 79.2 N/S N/C 4 45 8.2 20.8 100.0 0 337 60.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 218 Missing cases 337 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7 DE LO QUE HA VISTO QUIEN VA GANANDO EL D Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 1 49 8.8 47.8 47.8 ALFREDO DEL MAZO PRI 2 23 4.1 22.4 70.3 NINGUNO 3 12 2.2 11.9 82.2 N/S N/C 4 18 3.3 17.8 100.0 0 453 81.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 103 Missing cases 453 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 DEBATE CCS 5/25/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS EN (DEB10597) FRECPOND.LST P8 QUIEN CREE QUE GANO EL DEBATE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 1 92 16.6 39.2 39.2 ALFREDO DEL MAZO PRI 2 83 14.9 35.3 74.5 NINGUNO 3 46 8.2 19.4 93.9 N/S N/C 4 14 2.6 6.1 100.0 0 321 57.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 235 Missing cases 321 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9 DE CCS Y ADM QUIEN CREE QUE GANARA LA EL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 1 264 47.5 47.5 47.5 ALFREDO DEL MAZO PRI 2 197 35.4 35.4 82.9 OTRO 3 4 .7 .7 83.6 NINGUNO 4 24 4.3 4.3 87.8 N/S N/C 5 68 12.2 12.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 556 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P10 ENTRE CCP, CCS Y ADM QUIEN CREE QUE GANA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CARLOS CASTILLO PERA 1 75 13.4 13.4 13.4 CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 2 247 44.5 44.5 57.9 ALFREDO DEL MAZO PRI 3 173 31.1 31.1 89.0 OTRO 4 4 .7 .7 89.7 N/S N/C 5 57 10.3 10.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 556 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 DEBATE CCS 5/25/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS EN (DEB10597) FRECPOND.LST PELE POR CUAL CANDIDATO O PARTIDO VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CARLOS CASTILLO PERA 1 55 9.8 9.8 9.8 ALFREDO DEL MAZO PRI 2 99 17.9 17.9 27.7 CUAUHTEMOC CARDENAS 3 153 27.6 27.6 55.3 OTRO 4 13 2.4 2.4 57.7 NINGUNO 5 27 4.8 4.8 62.5 N/S N/C 6 209 37.5 37.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 556 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PSIM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 556 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 556 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 258 46.5 46.5 46.5 femenino 2 298 53.5 53.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 556 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 DEBATE CCS 5/25/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS EN (DEB10597) FRECPOND.LST EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 159 28.6 28.6 28.6 26-40 2 209 37.6 37.6 66.2 41-60 3 131 23.5 23.5 89.7 61 + 4 57 10.3 10.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 556 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INST Institución en donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 248 44.6 44.6 44.6 gob fed 2 69 12.5 12.5 57.1 paraestatal 3 7 1.3 1.3 58.4 emp priv 4 138 24.8 24.8 83.2 negocio prop 5 25 4.5 4.5 87.6 independiente 6 69 12.4 12.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 556 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OCUP Actividad PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 121 21.8 48.9 48.9 estudiante 2 93 16.7 37.4 86.3 jubilado 3 26 4.7 10.5 96.8 desemp 4 6 1.1 2.4 99.2 otro 5 2 .3 .8 100.0 0 308 55.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 248 Missing cases 308 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 DEBATE CCS 5/25/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS EN (DEB10597) FRECPOND.LST PUESTO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 248 44.6 44.6 44.6 1 25 4.5 4.5 49.1 2 72 13.0 13.0 62.1 3 6 1.0 1.0 63.1 4 201 36.1 36.1 99.2 5 4 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 556 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESCOL Escolaridad entrevistado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 1 .2 .2 .2 prim inc 2 14 2.6 2.6 2.8 prim comp 3 58 10.4 10.4 13.2 sec incom 4 10 1.7 1.7 14.9 sec comp 5 71 12.7 12.7 27.6 prep incom 6 37 6.6 6.6 34.3 prep comp 7 104 18.6 18.6 52.9 univ incom 8 76 13.6 13.6 66.5 univ comp 9 186 33.5 33.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 556 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 DEBATE CCS 5/25/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS EN (DEB10597) FRECPOND.LST INGRE Rango ingreso familiar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 14 2.5 2.5 2.5 1-3 sm 2 143 25.8 25.8 28.3 3-5 sm 3 58 10.5 10.5 38.8 5-7 sm 4 34 6.2 6.2 45.0 7-10 5 71 12.8 12.8 57.8 10 + SM 6 128 23.1 23.1 80.9 Nc 7 106 19.1 19.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 556 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 556 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 DEBATE CCS 5/25/97 FRECUENCIAS DF PONDERADAS EN (DEB10597) FRECPOND.LST This procedure was completed at 22:48:46