The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 501 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 5587 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 698 Value Labels for each Variable. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PACU ACUERDO PDTE ZEDILLO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 205 40.2 40.3 40.3 ACUERDO EN PARTE 2 43 8.5 8.5 48.8 DESACUERDO PARTE 3 9 1.8 1.8 50.6 DESACUERDO 4 180 35.2 35.3 85.9 NS/NC 5 72 14.0 14.1 100.0 0 1 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 509 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 DEMANDA GOB TAB VS PGR (NAL) 25/AGO/95 TELEFONO 8/25/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN TAB10895.FRE PNOT ACONTECIMIENTO POLITICO MAS IMPORTANTE? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DECLARA EZP EN NAY 1 10 1.9 1.9 1.9 LIBRE PRECIO AZUCAR 2 7 1.4 1.4 3.3 RECHAZO ADE 3 1 .2 .2 3.5 CONGRESO PRD 4 1 .1 .1 3.6 CONSULTA EZLN 5 4 .7 .7 4.3 PROGRAMA ADE 6 87 17.0 17.0 21.4 OTRO 7 23 4.5 4.5 25.9 NS/NC 8 378 74.1 74.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 511 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P3 SITUACION POLITICA DE TABASCO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PELIGROSA 1 92 17.9 17.9 17.9 PREOCUPANTE 2 281 54.9 54.9 72.9 TRANQUILA 3 44 8.7 8.7 81.5 MEJOR QUE ANTES 4 13 2.6 2.6 84.1 NS/NC 5 81 15.9 15.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 511 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4 ENTERADO DENUNCIA DE GOB.TAB CONTRA PGR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ESTABA ENTERADO 1 316 62.0 62.0 62.0 NO ENTERADO 2 191 37.4 37.4 99.4 NS/NC 3 3 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 511 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 DEMANDA GOB TAB VS PGR (NAL) 25/AGO/95 TELEFONO 8/25/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN TAB10895.FRE P5 MOTIVO GOB.TAB/PARA PRESENTAR DEMANDA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PRD DENUNCIO MAL MAN 1 21 4.1 6.7 6.7 PGR INICIO INVESTIGA 2 41 8.0 12.8 19.5 PROTEGERSE PAN 3 7 1.4 2.2 21.7 OTRO 4 91 17.9 28.8 50.6 NS/NC 5 156 30.6 49.4 100.0 0 194 38.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 316 Missing cases 194 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6 ¿ACUSACION DEL PRD ES CIERTA O FALSA? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CIERTA 1 239 46.7 46.7 46.7 FALSA 2 119 23.4 23.4 70.1 NS/NC 3 153 29.9 29.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 511 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7 ¿QUIEN TIENE LA RAZON GOB.TAB O PGR? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GOB. MADRAZO 1 146 28.7 28.7 28.7 PROCURADOR A LOZANO 2 225 44.1 44.2 73.0 NINGUNO 3 14 2.7 2.7 75.7 NS/NC 4 124 24.2 24.3 100.0 0 1 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 510 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 DEMANDA GOB TAB VS PGR (NAL) 25/AGO/95 TELEFONO 8/25/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN TAB10895.FRE P8 PROCURADOR ACTUA AFECTANDO AL PRI O NO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AFECTAR AL PRI 1 64 12.6 12.6 12.6 CUMPLIR SU DEBER 2 378 74.1 74.1 86.7 AMBAS 3 14 2.8 2.8 89.5 NS/NC 4 54 10.5 10.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 511 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9 CON DEMANDA GOB/DEFIENDE INTERESES TAB Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEFENDER INTS EDO 1 94 18.4 18.4 18.4 EVITAR INVESTIGUEN 2 324 63.4 63.4 81.9 AMBAS 3 22 4.2 4.2 86.1 NS/NC 4 71 13.9 13.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 511 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P10 ¿QUE SENSACION LE PRODUCE ESTA NOTICIA? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ENOJO 1 42 8.1 8.1 8.1 TRANQUILIDAD 2 16 3.1 3.1 11.2 NADA 3 56 10.9 10.9 22.2 OTRO 4 305 59.8 59.8 82.0 NS/NC 5 92 18.0 18.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 511 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 DEMANDA GOB TAB VS PGR (NAL) 25/AGO/95 TELEFONO 8/25/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN TAB10895.FRE P11 NOTICIA AFECTA ESTABILIDAD POLITICA TAB Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 448 87.7 87.7 87.7 NO 2 39 7.6 7.6 95.3 N/C 3 24 4.7 4.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 511 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P12 ¿AFECTA ESTABILIDAD POLITICA DEL PAIS? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 396 77.6 77.7 77.7 NO 2 89 17.5 17.5 95.1 N/C 3 25 4.9 4.9 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 510 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P12_1 ¿QUE TANTO? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHISIMO 1 67 13.1 16.9 16.9 MUCHO 2 211 41.4 53.3 70.3 POCO 3 93 18.2 23.5 93.8 NS/NC 4 25 4.8 6.2 100.0 0 115 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 396 Missing cases 115 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 DEMANDA GOB TAB VS PGR (NAL) 25/AGO/95 TELEFONO 8/25/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN TAB10895.FRE P13 CONFLICTO FORTALECE O DEBILITA GOB/EZP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LO FORTALECE 1 94 18.5 18.5 18.5 LO DEBILITA 2 339 66.4 66.4 84.9 QUEDA IGUAL 3 39 7.6 7.6 92.5 NS/NC 4 38 7.5 7.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 511 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P14 A QUIEN DARA LA RAZON LA SUPREMA C J Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AL PROCURADOR 1 230 45.1 45.1 45.1 AL GOBERNADOR 2 107 21.0 21.0 66.1 NS/NC 3 173 33.9 33.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 511 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P14_1 AL PROCURADOR ¿POR QUE? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent REGISTRO PAPEL 1 188 36.9 82.8 82.8 NS/NC 2 39 7.6 17.2 100.0 0 283 55.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 227 Missing cases 283 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 DEMANDA GOB TAB VS PGR (NAL) 25/AGO/95 TELEFONO 8/25/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN TAB10895.FRE P14_2 AL GOBERNADOR ¿POR QUE? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent REGISTRO PAPEL 1 89 17.4 82.6 82.6 NS/NC 2 19 3.6 17.4 100.0 0 403 79.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 107 Missing cases 403 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - POPI OPINION PDTE ERNESTO ZEDILLO... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJORO 1 120 23.5 23.6 23.6 NO CAMBIO 2 170 33.2 33.3 56.9 EMPEORO 3 151 29.6 29.7 86.5 NS/NC 4 69 13.4 13.5 100.0 0 1 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 510 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PSIM SIMPATIZA CANDIDATOS ELEC 94 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DFC DEL PAN 1 178 34.8 34.9 34.9 EZP DEL PRI 2 182 35.7 35.8 70.7 CCS DEL PRD 3 59 11.5 11.6 82.2 NINGUNO 5 63 12.3 12.3 94.5 NS/NC 6 28 5.5 5.5 100.0 0 1 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 510 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 DEMANDA GOB TAB VS PGR (NAL) 25/AGO/95 TELEFONO 8/25/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN TAB10895.FRE SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 232 45.4 45.4 45.4 femenino 2 279 54.6 54.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 511 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 159 31.0 31.0 31.0 26-40 2 197 38.5 38.5 69.6 41-60 3 108 21.2 21.2 90.7 61 + 4 47 9.3 9.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 511 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INST Institución donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 267 52.3 52.3 52.3 gob fed 2 46 9.0 9.0 61.3 paraestatal 3 2 .4 .4 61.7 emp priv 4 88 17.3 17.3 79.0 negocio prop 5 33 6.5 6.5 85.5 independiente 6 74 14.5 14.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 511 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 DEMANDA GOB TAB VS PGR (NAL) 25/AGO/95 TELEFONO 8/25/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN TAB10895.FRE OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 153 30.0 57.3 57.3 estudiante 2 83 16.2 31.1 88.4 jubilado 3 21 4.1 7.7 96.1 desemp 4 8 1.7 3.2 99.3 otro 5 2 .4 .7 100.0 0 244 47.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 267 Missing cases 244 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 6 1.2 1.2 1.2 prim inc 2 21 4.1 4.1 5.3 prim comp 3 63 12.3 12.3 17.6 sec incom 4 16 3.2 3.2 20.8 sec comp 5 119 23.3 23.3 44.1 prep incom 6 35 6.9 6.9 51.0 prep comp 7 81 15.9 15.9 66.9 univ incom 8 84 16.4 16.4 83.3 univ comp + 9 85 16.7 16.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 511 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 DEMANDA GOB TAB VS PGR (NAL) 25/AGO/95 TELEFONO 8/25/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN TAB10895.FRE INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 26 5.2 6.4 6.4 1-3 sm 2 124 24.3 30.3 36.7 3-5 sm 3 145 28.5 35.5 72.2 5-7 sm 4 62 12.1 15.1 87.3 7-10 5 28 5.4 6.8 94.1 10 + SM 6 24 4.7 5.9 100.0 0 101 19.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 511 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 409 Missing cases 101 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 DEMANDA GOB TAB VS PGR (NAL) 25/AGO/95 TELEFONO 8/25/95 FRECUENCIAS NAL PONDERADAS EN TAB10895.FRE This procedure was completed at 17:05:42