The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 1199 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 5587 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 698 Value Labels for each Variable. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P1 PERSONAS VIVEN EN ESTA VIVIENDA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 21 1.8 1.8 1.8 2 83 6.9 6.9 8.7 3 155 12.9 12.9 21.7 4 286 23.8 23.8 45.5 5 260 21.6 21.6 67.1 6 168 14.0 14.0 81.1 7 94 7.8 7.8 88.9 8 63 5.2 5.2 94.1 9 30 2.5 2.5 96.6 10 18 1.5 1.5 98.1 11 7 .5 .5 98.6 12 5 .4 .4 99.0 13 2 .2 .2 99.1 14 1 .1 .1 99.2 15 1 .1 .1 99.3 16 2 .2 .2 99.5 17 1 .1 .1 99.6 20 1 .1 .1 99.6 33 1 .1 .1 99.7 95 1 .1 .1 99.8 96 1 .1 .1 99.9 N/C 98 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P2_1 VIVEN AQUI: 0 A 12 AÑOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 308 25.6 25.6 25.6 2 264 22.0 22.0 47.7 3 136 11.3 11.3 59.0 4 51 4.2 4.2 63.2 5 17 1.4 1.4 64.6 6 8 .6 .6 65.3 8 1 .1 .1 65.3 9 1 .1 .1 65.4 NINGUNA 96 411 34.2 34.2 99.7 N/S 98 2 .2 .2 99.8 N/C 99 2 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2_2 VIVEN AQUI: 12 A 18 AÑOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 292 24.4 24.4 24.4 2 181 15.1 15.1 39.5 3 63 5.2 5.3 44.7 4 17 1.4 1.4 46.2 5 2 .2 .2 46.3 6 10 .8 .8 47.2 8 1 .1 .1 47.3 9 1 .1 .1 47.3 76 1 .1 .1 47.4 93 1 .1 .1 47.5 NINGUNA 96 629 52.4 52.4 99.9 N/S 98 1 .1 .1 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P2_3 VIVEN AQUI: 18 A 64 AÑOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 94 7.8 7.8 7.8 2 536 44.7 44.7 52.5 3 245 20.4 20.4 72.9 4 175 14.6 14.6 87.5 5 75 6.2 6.2 93.8 6 32 2.6 2.6 96.4 7 9 .8 .8 97.2 8 2 .2 .2 97.3 9 4 .3 .3 97.6 10 2 .2 .2 97.8 14 1 .1 .1 97.9 NINGUNA 96 25 2.1 2.1 99.9 N/S 98 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2_4 VIVEN AQUI: MAS DE 64 AÑOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 94 7.8 7.9 7.9 2 24 2.0 2.0 9.9 3 1 .1 .1 10.0 4 1 .1 .1 10.1 6 2 .2 .2 10.3 9 1 .1 .1 10.4 11 3 .3 .3 10.7 91 1 .1 .1 10.7 NINGUNA 96 1063 88.6 89.1 99.9 N/S 98 2 .1 .1 100.0 0 7 .6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1193 Missing cases 7 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P3 RECUERDA QUE AÑO NACIO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 1178 98.2 98.2 98.2 NO 2 20 1.7 1.7 99.8 N/C 3 2 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P3_1 ¿QUE AÑO? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1907 1 .1 .1 .1 1914 4 .3 .3 .5 1915 1 .1 .1 .6 1916 1 .1 .1 .7 1917 1 .1 .1 .8 1918 3 .2 .2 1.0 1919 7 .6 .6 1.7 1920 8 .7 .7 2.4 1921 1 .1 .1 2.5 1922 4 .3 .4 2.9 1923 4 .3 .3 3.2 1924 4 .3 .3 3.5 1925 9 .7 .7 4.2 1926 2 .2 .2 4.4 1927 7 .6 .6 5.0 1928 6 .5 .5 5.5 1929 9 .7 .7 6.2 1930 6 .5 .5 6.8 1931 6 .5 .5 7.3 1932 10 .8 .8 8.1 1933 10 .8 .8 9.0 1934 9 .7 .7 9.7 1935 9 .8 .8 10.5 1936 8 .7 .7 11.2 1937 9 .7 .7 11.9 1938 13 1.1 1.1 13.0 1939 12 1.0 1.0 14.0 1940 13 1.0 1.1 15.1 1941 10 .9 .9 15.9 1942 7 .6 .6 16.5 1943 11 .9 .9 17.5 1944 17 1.4 1.4 18.9 1945 15 1.2 1.3 20.2 1946 9 .8 .8 20.9 1947 17 1.4 1.4 22.4 1948 16 1.3 1.3 23.7 1949 16 1.3 1.3 25.0 1950 19 1.6 1.6 26.7 1951 15 1.2 1.3 27.9 1952 20 1.7 1.7 29.6 1953 20 1.7 1.7 31.4 1954 21 1.8 1.8 33.1 1955 19 1.6 1.6 34.8 1956 25 2.1 2.1 36.9 1957 30 2.5 2.5 39.4 1958 25 2.1 2.1 41.6 1959 32 2.7 2.7 44.3 1960 26 2.2 2.2 46.5 1961 25 2.0 2.1 48.6 1962 25 2.1 2.1 50.7 1963 29 2.4 2.4 53.1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P3_1 ¿QUE AÑO? 1964 32 2.7 2.8 55.9 1965 38 3.2 3.2 59.1 1966 32 2.7 2.7 61.8 1967 28 2.3 2.4 64.2 1968 34 2.8 2.9 67.1 1969 32 2.6 2.7 69.8 1970 39 3.3 3.3 73.1 1971 31 2.6 2.7 75.8 1972 54 4.5 4.6 80.4 1973 45 3.8 3.8 84.2 1974 46 3.8 3.9 88.1 1975 59 4.9 5.0 93.1 1976 44 3.7 3.7 96.8 1977 32 2.6 2.7 99.5 1978 2 .2 .2 99.7 N/C 9999 4 .3 .3 100.0 0 22 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1178 Missing cases 22 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P4 AÑOS DE ESTUDIO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 42 3.5 3.5 3.5 1 32 2.7 2.7 6.2 2 33 2.7 2.7 8.9 3 58 4.8 4.8 13.8 4 46 3.8 3.8 17.6 5 34 2.8 2.8 20.4 6 223 18.5 18.5 39.0 7 19 1.6 1.6 40.5 8 44 3.7 3.7 44.2 9 214 17.8 17.8 62.0 10 46 3.8 3.8 65.8 11 48 4.0 4.0 69.9 12 141 11.7 11.7 81.6 13 44 3.6 3.6 85.3 14 29 2.4 2.4 87.6 15 27 2.2 2.2 89.9 16 27 2.2 2.2 92.1 17 31 2.6 2.6 94.7 18 20 1.7 1.7 96.4 19 3 .2 .2 96.6 20 7 .6 .6 97.2 21 1 .1 .1 97.3 24 1 .1 .1 97.4 25 2 .2 .2 97.6 26 1 .1 .1 97.7 30 1 .1 .1 97.7 32 1 .1 .1 97.8 33 2 .2 .2 98.0 50 2 .2 .2 98.2 63 1 .1 .1 98.3 66 1 .1 .1 98.4 69 1 .1 .1 98.5 91 1 .1 .1 98.5 96 1 .1 .1 98.6 N/C 98 16 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P5 SIT PERS MEJOR O PEOR HACE UN AÑO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 90 7.5 7.5 7.5 IGUAL 2 180 15.0 15.0 22.5 PEOR 3 923 76.9 76.9 99.4 N/S 4 5 .4 .4 99.8 N/C 5 3 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P6 COMO SERA SU SITUACION AÑO QUE ENTRA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 182 15.1 15.1 15.1 IGUAL 2 187 15.6 15.6 30.7 PEOR 3 640 53.3 53.3 84.1 N/S 4 189 15.8 15.8 99.8 N/C 5 2 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 18 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P6_1 ¿POR QUE? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEVALUACION 1 103 8.5 16.0 16.0 CRISIS ECO 2 292 24.3 45.6 61.7 BAJOS SALARIOS 3 42 3.5 6.5 68.2 MAL GOB 4 80 6.7 12.5 80.7 DESEMPLEO 5 75 6.3 11.7 92.5 10 8 .6 1.2 93.7 PARTIDOS POLITICOS 11 2 .2 .3 94.0 SEQUIA 12 2 .2 .3 94.3 16 1 .1 .1 94.4 21 1 .1 .1 94.5 30 1 .1 .1 94.7 92 1 .1 .1 94.8 97 8 .7 1.3 96.1 N/C 98 9 .8 1.5 97.6 N/S 99 15 1.3 2.4 100.0 0 560 46.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 640 Missing cases 560 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7 SITUACION ECO ACTUAL ¿PROVOCA PROBLEMAS? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 1019 84.9 84.9 84.9 NO 2 94 7.9 7.9 92.8 N/S 3 83 6.9 6.9 99.7 N/C 4 3 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 19 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P8 QUE TAN GRAVES PUEDEN SER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHISIMO 1 82 6.8 8.1 8.1 MUCHO 2 699 58.2 68.6 76.7 REGULAR 3 108 9.0 10.6 87.3 POCO 4 94 7.8 9.2 96.5 N/S 5 34 2.9 3.4 99.9 N/C 6 1 .1 .1 100.0 0 182 15.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1018 Missing cases 182 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 20 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P9 PROBLEMA MAS GRAVE DEL MPIO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DESEMPLEO 1 584 48.6 48.7 48.7 SEGURIDAD PUBLICA 2 53 4.4 4.4 53.1 CRISIS ECONOMICA 3 171 14.3 14.3 67.4 CONTAMINACION 4 6 .5 .5 67.9 INFLACION 5 19 1.5 1.5 69.4 POBREZA 6 61 5.1 5.1 74.5 AGUA 7 17 1.4 1.4 75.9 DEVALUACION 8 18 1.5 1.5 77.3 EDUCACION 9 5 .4 .4 77.7 SALARIOS BAJOS 10 36 3.0 3.0 80.8 MAL GOBIERNO 11 106 8.8 8.8 89.6 PART POLITICOS 12 17 1.4 1.4 91.0 CORRUPCION 14 13 1.1 1.1 92.1 OTROS 15 8 .7 .7 92.8 SEQUIA 16 4 .3 .3 93.1 NINGUNO 17 3 .2 .2 93.3 SERVICIOS PUBLICOS 18 9 .8 .8 94.1 IMPUESTOS 20 2 .2 .2 94.3 CAMPO 21 1 .1 .1 94.4 PAVIMENTACION 22 13 1.1 1.1 95.5 DELINCUENCIA 23 4 .3 .3 95.8 DROGADICCION 24 2 .2 .2 96.0 97 4 .4 .4 96.3 N/C 98 2 .2 .2 96.5 N/S 99 42 3.5 3.5 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 21 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE PELE SI HOY ELEC PDTE MPAL POR CUAL VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 258 21.5 21.5 21.5 PRI 2 192 16.0 16.0 37.5 PRD 4 10 .8 .8 38.3 OTRO 10 351 29.2 29.2 67.6 NINGUNO 11 151 12.6 12.6 80.2 NO SABE 12 228 19.0 19.0 99.2 14 10 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P10 IMPORTA QUIEN SEA PROX PDTE MPAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCHISIMO 1 39 3.3 3.3 3.3 MUCHO 2 616 51.3 51.3 54.6 REGULAR 3 93 7.8 7.8 62.4 POCO 4 180 15.0 15.0 77.4 N/S 5 22 1.9 1.9 79.2 N/C 6 234 19.5 19.5 98.7 7 15 1.3 1.3 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 22 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P11 SE ACERCA MAS A LO QUE PIENSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VOTA POR MISMO 1 591 49.2 49.3 49.3 POR UNO U OTRO 2 500 41.6 41.7 91.0 NINGUNA 3 77 6.4 6.4 97.4 N/S 4 24 2.0 2.0 99.4 N/C 5 8 .6 .6 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P12 SE ACERCA MAS A LO QUE PIENSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO IMPORTA NO VOTE 1 248 20.6 20.6 20.6 TODOS DEBEN VOTAR 2 902 75.2 75.3 95.9 NINGUNA 3 22 1.9 1.9 97.8 N/S 4 25 2.0 2.1 99.8 N/C 5 2 .2 .2 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 23 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P13 SE ACERCA MAS A LO QUE PIENSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GUSTO HABLAR DE POL 1 507 42.3 42.3 42.3 NO HABLO DE POLITICA 2 665 55.4 55.5 97.8 NINGUNA 3 20 1.7 1.7 99.5 N/S 4 5 .4 .4 99.9 N/C 5 1 .1 .1 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P14 EL MPIO DE DURANGO HA MEJORADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent HA MEJORADO 1 867 72.2 72.3 72.3 NO HA CAMBIADO 2 191 15.9 15.9 88.2 HA EMPEORADO 3 95 7.9 7.9 96.1 N/S 4 42 3.5 3.5 99.6 N/C 5 5 .4 .4 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 24 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P15_1 VECES A LA SEM LEE SECC POLIT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 116 9.7 9.7 9.7 2 107 8.9 8.9 18.6 3 89 7.4 7.4 26.1 4 22 1.8 1.8 27.9 5 16 1.3 1.3 29.2 6 14 1.2 1.2 30.3 7 142 11.9 11.9 42.2 10 5 .4 .4 42.6 12 1 .1 .1 42.7 14 2 .2 .2 42.9 46 1 .1 .1 43.0 77 1 .1 .1 43.1 NUNCA 96 677 56.4 56.5 99.6 N/C 98 4 .4 .4 100.0 0 2 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1198 Missing cases 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 25 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P15_2 VECES A LA SEM VE NOTICIAS TELE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 17 1.4 1.4 1.4 2 87 7.2 7.2 8.6 3 111 9.2 9.2 17.9 4 43 3.6 3.6 21.5 5 77 6.4 6.4 27.9 6 62 5.1 5.1 33.0 7 606 50.5 50.5 83.6 8 4 .3 .3 83.9 9 2 .2 .2 84.1 10 12 1.0 1.0 85.1 12 12 1.0 1.0 86.1 13 2 .1 .1 86.2 14 41 3.4 3.4 89.6 15 1 .1 .1 89.7 16 1 .1 .1 89.8 20 1 .1 .1 89.9 21 1 .1 .1 90.0 22 1 .1 .1 90.0 27 1 .1 .1 90.1 32 1 .1 .1 90.2 71 1 .1 .1 90.2 77 1 .1 .1 90.3 95 1 .1 .1 90.4 NUNCA 96 111 9.2 9.2 99.6 97 1 .1 .1 99.7 N/C 98 4 .3 .3 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 26 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P15_3 VECES A LA SEM ESCUCHA NOTICIAS RADIO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 24 2.0 2.0 2.0 2 82 6.8 6.8 8.8 3 72 6.0 6.0 14.8 4 33 2.8 2.8 17.6 5 53 4.4 4.4 22.0 6 41 3.4 3.4 25.4 7 433 36.1 36.1 61.5 8 3 .2 .2 61.7 9 3 .3 .3 62.0 10 18 1.5 1.5 63.5 11 2 .1 .1 63.6 12 11 .9 .9 64.5 14 19 1.6 1.6 66.2 16 1 .1 .1 66.3 18 1 .1 .1 66.3 21 1 .1 .1 66.4 24 2 .2 .2 66.6 28 1 .1 .1 66.7 35 2 .2 .2 66.8 41 1 .1 .1 66.9 NUNCA 96 393 32.8 32.8 99.7 97 1 .1 .1 99.8 N/C 98 2 .2 .2 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P16 CUAL ES SU RELIGION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CATOLICA 1 1091 90.9 91.0 91.0 PROTESTANTE 2 31 2.6 2.6 93.6 OTRA 5 40 3.4 3.4 97.0 NINGUNA 6 36 3.0 3.0 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 27 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P17 FRECUENCIA VA A LA IGLESIA O TEMPLO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DIARIO 1 56 4.7 4.7 4.7 UNA VEZ SEM 2 596 49.6 49.7 54.4 DE VEZ EN CUANDO 3 463 38.6 38.6 93.0 NUNCA 4 68 5.7 5.7 98.7 N/C 5 15 1.3 1.3 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P18 CANDIDATO PAN A PDTE MUNICIPAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 635 52.9 52.9 52.9 NO 2 556 46.3 46.4 99.3 N/C 3 8 .7 .7 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P18_1 QUIEN, ALFREDO HERRERA DERA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ALFREDO HERRERA 1 565 47.1 89.1 89.1 2 51 4.3 8.1 97.2 3 18 1.5 2.8 100.0 0 566 47.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 635 Missing cases 566 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 28 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P19 CANDIDATO PRI A PDTE MUNICIPAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 824 68.7 68.7 68.7 NO 2 371 30.9 30.9 99.6 N/C 3 4 .4 .4 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P19_1 ¿QUIEN? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SERGIO GONZALEZ 1 782 65.1 94.8 94.8 2 33 2.8 4.0 98.8 3 10 .8 1.2 100.0 0 376 31.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 824 Missing cases 376 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P20 CANDIDATO PT A PDTE MUNICIPAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 870 72.5 72.6 72.6 NO 2 324 27.0 27.0 99.6 N/C 3 5 .4 .4 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 29 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P20_1 ¿QUIEN? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MARCOS CRUZ 1 820 68.3 94.3 94.3 2 31 2.6 3.5 97.8 3 19 1.6 2.2 100.0 0 330 27.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 870 Missing cases 330 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P18A CANDIDATO DEL PAN A PDTE MUNICIPAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1200 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1200 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P18A_1 ¿QUIEN? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1200 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1200 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 30 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P19A CANDIDATO PRI A PDTE MUNICIPAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1200 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1200 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P19A_1 ¿QUIEN? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1200 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1200 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P20A CANDIDATO PRD A PDTE MUNICIPAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1200 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1200 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 31 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P20A_1 ¿QUIEN? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1200 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1200 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P21_1 QUIEN CREE QUE: CLARO AL HABLAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 195 16.3 16.3 16.3 PRI 2 190 15.8 15.9 32.2 PT 3 384 32.0 32.0 64.2 NINGUNO 4 136 11.3 11.3 75.5 N/S-N/C 5 294 24.5 24.5 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P21_2 QUIEN CREE QUE: CERCANIA CON EL PUEBLO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 121 10.1 10.1 10.1 PRI 2 222 18.5 18.5 28.7 PT 3 505 42.1 42.1 70.8 NINGUNO 4 104 8.7 8.7 79.5 N/S-N/C 5 246 20.5 20.5 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 32 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P21_3 QUIEN CREE QUE: PREPARADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 166 13.8 13.8 13.8 PRI 2 287 23.9 24.0 37.8 PT 3 291 24.3 24.3 62.1 NINGUNO 4 111 9.3 9.3 71.4 N/S-N/C 5 343 28.6 28.6 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P21_4 QUIEN CREE QUE: HONRADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 154 12.9 12.9 12.9 PRI 2 121 10.1 10.1 22.9 PT 3 273 22.8 22.8 45.7 NINGUNO 4 300 25.0 25.0 70.8 N/S-N/C 5 351 29.2 29.2 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 33 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P21_5 QUIEN CREE QUE: OPCION DE CAMBIO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 237 19.7 19.8 19.8 PRI 2 166 13.8 13.8 33.6 PT 3 366 30.5 30.6 64.1 NINGUNO 4 146 12.2 12.2 76.3 N/S-N/C 5 284 23.7 23.7 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P21_6 QUIEN CREE QUE: EXPERIENCIA PARA GOB Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 146 12.2 12.2 12.2 PRI 2 309 25.8 25.8 38.0 PT 3 288 24.0 24.0 62.0 NINGUNO 4 140 11.7 11.7 73.6 N/S-N/C 5 316 26.3 26.4 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 34 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P21_7 QUIEN CREE QUE: DISMINUIRA LA POBREZA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 135 11.2 11.2 11.2 PRI 2 138 11.5 11.5 22.8 PT 3 284 23.6 23.7 46.4 NINGUNO 4 259 21.6 21.6 68.1 N/S-N/C 5 383 31.9 31.9 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P21_8 QUIEN CREE QUE: PROBLEMA DEL EMPLEO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 135 11.3 11.3 11.3 PRI 2 143 11.9 11.9 23.2 PT 3 272 22.7 22.7 45.9 NINGUNO 4 253 21.1 21.1 67.0 N/S-N/C 5 396 33.0 33.0 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 35 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P21_9 QUIEN CREE QUE: COMBATIRA CORRUPCION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 159 13.2 13.3 13.3 PRI 2 122 10.2 10.2 23.4 PT 3 249 20.7 20.7 44.2 NINGUNO 4 269 22.4 22.4 66.6 N/S-N/C 5 400 33.3 33.4 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P22 MAS IMPORTANTE: TENGA EXPERIENCIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXPER INTEL 1 485 40.4 40.4 40.4 OPCION CAMBIO 2 624 52.0 52.0 92.4 NINGUNA 3 44 3.7 3.7 96.1 N/S 4 44 3.7 3.7 99.8 N/C 5 3 .2 .2 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P23 PARTIDO QUE PERTENECE ACTUAL PDTE MUNICI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 952 79.3 79.4 79.4 NO 2 221 18.4 18.4 97.8 N/S 3 13 1.1 1.1 98.9 N/C 4 13 1.1 1.1 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 36 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P23_1 A QUE PARTIDO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PAN 1 7 .6 .8 .8 PRI 2 29 2.4 3.0 3.8 PRD 3 3 .2 .3 4.1 PT 4 908 75.6 95.3 99.4 OTRO 5 1 .1 .1 99.5 N/S 6 1 .1 .1 99.7 N/C 7 3 .3 .3 100.0 0 248 20.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 952 Missing cases 248 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P24 UNICOS CANDIDATOS PAN Y PT CUAL VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CAND PAN 1 390 32.5 32.5 32.5 CAND PT 2 540 45.0 45.0 77.5 NINGUNO 3 161 13.4 13.4 91.0 N/S 4 99 8.3 8.3 99.2 N/C 5 9 .8 .8 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 37 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P25 UNICOS CANDIDATOS PRI Y PT CUAL VOTARIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CAND PRI 1 307 25.6 25.6 25.6 CAND PT 2 595 49.6 49.6 75.2 NINGUNO 3 192 16.0 16.0 91.3 N/S 4 95 7.9 7.9 99.2 N/C 5 10 .8 .8 100.0 0 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P26 SITUACION ECO ACTUAL DEL PAIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJOR 1 48 4.0 4.0 4.0 IGUAL 2 40 3.3 3.3 7.3 PEOR 3 1093 91.1 91.2 98.5 N/S 4 13 1.1 1.1 99.6 N/C 5 5 .4 .4 100.0 0 2 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1198 Missing cases 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 38 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE PVOT_1 VOTOS PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 83 6.9 17.6 17.6 DOS 2 126 10.5 26.7 44.3 TRES 3 60 5.0 12.7 57.0 CUATRO 4 8 .6 1.6 58.6 CINCO 5 194 16.2 41.4 100.0 0 730 60.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 470 Missing cases 730 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_2 VOTOS PT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 78 6.5 13.2 13.2 DOS 2 102 8.5 17.3 30.5 TRES 3 88 7.4 15.0 45.5 CUATRO 4 5 .4 .8 46.3 CINCO 5 317 26.4 53.7 100.0 0 609 50.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 591 Missing cases 609 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 39 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE PVOT_3 VOTOS PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 86 7.2 25.8 25.8 DOS 2 67 5.6 20.2 46.0 TRES 3 41 3.4 12.3 58.3 CUATRO 4 4 .3 1.1 59.5 CINCO 5 135 11.3 40.5 100.0 0 866 72.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 334 Missing cases 866 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_4 VOTOS PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 47 3.9 73.5 73.5 DOS 2 9 .7 13.6 87.1 TRES 3 1 .1 1.8 88.8 CINCO 5 7 .6 11.2 100.0 0 1136 94.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 64 Missing cases 1136 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_5 VOTOS A OTRO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 9 .7 62.7 62.7 CUATRO 4 1 .1 7.3 70.1 CINCO 5 4 .3 29.9 100.0 0 1186 98.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 14 Missing cases 1186 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 40 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE PVOT_6 VOTOS A ABSTENCION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 .2 2.2 2.2 DOS 2 1 .1 1.4 3.6 CINCO 5 82 6.8 96.4 100.0 0 1116 92.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 85 Missing cases 1116 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_7 VOTOS A N/S Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 2 .2 1.3 1.3 DOS 2 1 .1 .5 1.8 CINCO 5 139 11.6 98.2 100.0 0 1058 88.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 142 Missing cases 1058 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PVOT_8 VOTOS A N/C Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 9 .7 100.0 100.0 0 1191 99.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 9 Missing cases 1191 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 41 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P28 QUE PREFIERE EN POLITICA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MALO CONOCIDO 1 385 32.1 32.1 32.1 NO ARRIESGA NO GANA 2 694 57.8 57.8 89.9 NINGUNA 3 74 6.2 6.2 96.1 N/S 4 43 3.6 3.6 99.7 N/C 5 3 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P29_1 ACUERDO PDTE DE LA REPUBLICA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 510 42.5 42.5 42.5 DESACUERDO 2 549 45.8 45.8 88.3 N/S 3 123 10.3 10.3 98.6 N/C 4 17 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P29_2 ACUERDO GOBERNADOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 643 53.6 53.6 53.6 DESACUERDO 2 478 39.8 39.8 93.4 N/S 3 74 6.1 6.1 99.5 N/C 4 6 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 42 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P29_3 ACUERDO PDTE MUNICIPAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 883 73.6 73.6 73.6 DESACUERDO 2 252 21.0 21.0 94.6 N/S 3 59 4.9 4.9 99.5 N/C 4 6 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P30 DOS AFIRMACIONES QUE VA A PASAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VOTO DECIDE GANADOR 1 530 44.2 44.2 44.2 PARTIDOS NEGOCIAN 2 543 45.2 45.2 89.4 19 1 .1 .1 89.5 NINGUNA 96 18 1.5 1.5 91.0 N/C 98 4 .3 .3 91.3 N/S 99 104 8.7 8.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P31 SE ACERCA MAS A LO QUE PIENSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GENTE NO INFLUENCIA 1 813 67.7 67.7 67.7 GENTE SI INFLUENCIA 2 299 24.9 24.9 92.7 NINGUNA 3 29 2.4 2.4 95.1 N/S 4 52 4.3 4.3 99.4 N/C 5 7 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 43 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P32 DOS AFIRMACIONES SE ACERCA A LO QUE PIEN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GOB IMPORTAN PERS 1 237 19.8 19.8 19.8 GOB NO IMPORTAN PERS 2 917 76.4 76.4 96.1 NINGUNA 3 10 .8 .8 97.0 N/S 4 32 2.7 2.7 99.7 N/C 5 4 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P33 MAS IMPORTANTE PARTIDO O CANDIDATO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CANDIDATO 1 798 66.5 66.5 66.5 PARTIDO 2 315 26.2 26.2 92.7 N/S 3 73 6.1 6.1 98.8 N/C 4 14 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P34_1 ULTIMOS AÑOS: MAS O MENOS LIBRE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAS 1 748 62.3 62.3 62.3 IGUAL 2 174 14.5 14.5 76.9 MENOS 3 235 19.6 19.6 96.5 N/S 4 36 3.0 3.0 99.5 N/C 5 6 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 44 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P34_2 ULTIMOS AÑOS: OPORTUNIDAD MEJORAR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAS 1 473 39.4 39.4 39.4 IGUAL 2 140 11.7 11.7 51.1 MENOS 3 524 43.7 43.7 94.8 N/S 4 57 4.7 4.7 99.5 N/C 5 6 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P35_1 ACEPTA MAS O MENOS PRI GOBIERNE PAIS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAS 1 181 15.0 15.0 15.0 IGUAL 2 125 10.4 10.4 25.4 MENOS 3 820 68.3 68.3 93.8 N/S 4 65 5.4 5.4 99.2 N/C 5 10 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P35_2 MEXICO CERCA SER PAIS DESARROLLADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAS CERCA 1 233 19.4 19.4 19.4 IGUAL 2 59 4.9 4.9 24.3 MAS LEJOS 3 837 69.7 69.7 94.0 N/S 4 64 5.3 5.3 99.4 N/C 5 7 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 45 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P35_3 EXISTE MAS IGUALDAD ENTRE MEXICANOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAS 1 336 28.0 28.0 28.0 IGUAL 2 169 14.1 14.1 42.1 MENOS 3 625 52.1 52.1 94.1 N/S 4 63 5.3 5.3 99.4 N/C 5 7 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P35_4 MEXICO ES MAS DEPENDIENTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MAS 1 923 76.9 76.9 76.9 IGUAL 2 37 3.1 3.1 80.0 MENOS 3 183 15.2 15.2 95.2 N/S 4 52 4.3 4.3 99.6 N/C 5 5 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P36_1 ACUERDO MEDIDAS GOB: VENTA BANCOS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 240 20.0 20.0 20.0 ACUERDO PARTE 2 75 6.3 6.3 26.2 DESACUERDO 3 756 63.0 63.0 89.2 N/S 4 117 9.7 9.7 99.0 N/C 5 12 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 46 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P36_2 ACUERDO MEDIDAS GOB: ENTRADA EMPR EXTR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 540 45.0 45.0 45.0 ACUERDO PARTE 2 84 7.0 7.0 52.0 DESACUERDO 3 490 40.8 40.8 92.8 N/S 4 77 6.4 6.4 99.2 N/C 5 9 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P36_3 ACUERDO MEDIDAS GOB: REPARTO TIERRAS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 447 37.2 37.2 37.2 ACUERDO PARTE 2 99 8.2 8.2 45.4 DESACUERDO 3 532 44.3 44.3 89.7 N/S 4 114 9.5 9.5 99.2 N/C 5 9 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P36_4 ACUERDO MEDIDAS GOB: TLC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 526 43.8 43.8 43.8 ACUERDO PARTE 2 99 8.2 8.2 52.0 DESACUERDO 3 450 37.5 37.5 89.6 N/S 4 115 9.6 9.6 99.1 N/C 5 11 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 47 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P36_5 ACUERDO MEDIDAS GOB: SOLIDARIDAD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 840 70.0 70.0 70.0 ACUERDO PARTE 2 108 9.0 9.0 79.0 DESACUERDO 3 205 17.1 17.1 96.1 N/S 4 42 3.5 3.5 99.6 N/C 5 5 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P36_6 ACUERDO MEDIDAS GOB: SACERDOTES VOTEN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 783 65.2 65.2 65.2 ACUERDO PARTE 2 43 3.6 3.6 68.8 DESACUERDO 3 309 25.8 25.8 94.6 N/S 4 58 4.9 4.9 99.5 N/C 5 6 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P36_7 ACUERDO MEDIDAS GOB: REFORMA ELECTORAL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 1038 86.5 86.5 86.5 ACUERDO PARTE 2 41 3.4 3.4 89.9 DESACUERDO 3 69 5.8 5.8 95.7 N/S 4 41 3.4 3.4 99.1 N/C 5 11 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 48 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE P37 SABE QUE ES CDP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 431 35.9 35.9 35.9 NO 2 757 63.1 63.1 99.0 N/S 3 8 .7 .7 99.7 N/C 4 4 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P37_1 HA PARTICIPADO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 87 7.3 20.3 20.3 NO 2 338 28.1 78.3 98.6 N/C 3 6 .5 1.4 100.0 0 769 64.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 431 Missing cases 769 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 564 47.0 47.0 47.0 femenino 2 636 53.0 53.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 49 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 363 30.3 30.3 30.3 26-40 2 440 36.6 36.6 66.9 41-60 3 278 23.2 23.2 90.1 61 + 4 112 9.3 9.3 99.4 11 1 .1 .1 99.5 12 2 .2 .2 99.7 13 1 .1 .1 99.8 15 2 .2 .2 99.9 17 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INST Institución donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 693 57.7 57.7 57.7 gob fed 2 91 7.6 7.6 65.3 paraestatal 3 11 .9 .9 66.2 emp priv 4 158 13.1 13.1 79.3 negocio prop 5 120 10.0 10.0 89.3 independiente 6 128 10.7 10.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 50 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 420 35.0 60.6 60.6 estudiante 2 141 11.8 20.4 81.0 jubilado 3 42 3.5 6.1 87.1 desemp 4 76 6.3 11.0 98.1 otro 5 13 1.1 1.9 100.0 0 507 42.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 693 Missing cases 507 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUESTO Que puesto ocupa en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario, Patron o 1 11 1.0 2.3 2.3 Directivo o Func de 2 22 1.9 4.4 6.7 Contratista o trabaj 3 197 16.4 38.7 45.4 Profesionista Indepe 4 20 1.6 3.9 49.3 Emplea, trabaj, Obre 5 246 20.5 48.5 97.8 trabajador sin pago 6 2 .2 .5 98.3 10 1 .1 .2 98.5 12 1 .1 .2 98.7 14 2 .2 .4 99.1 40 2 .2 .4 99.5 54 1 .1 .2 99.8 96 1 .1 .2 100.0 0 693 57.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 507 Missing cases 693 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 51 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 63 5.2 5.2 5.2 prim inc 2 204 17.0 17.0 22.2 prim comp 3 233 19.4 19.4 41.7 sec incom 4 69 5.7 5.7 47.4 sec comp 5 236 19.7 19.7 67.0 prep incom 6 112 9.3 9.3 76.3 prep comp 7 119 9.9 9.9 86.3 univ incom 8 90 7.5 7.5 93.8 univ comp + 9 74 6.2 6.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 281 23.5 23.5 23.5 1-3 sm 2 613 51.1 51.1 74.5 3-5 sm 3 190 15.8 15.8 90.3 5-7 sm 4 45 3.7 3.7 94.1 7-10 5 41 3.4 3.4 97.5 10 + SM 6 30 2.5 2.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 52 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE DEPEN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 34 2.8 2.8 2.8 2 105 8.7 8.7 11.5 3 195 16.2 16.2 27.8 4 279 23.3 23.3 51.0 5 263 21.9 21.9 73.0 6 145 12.1 12.1 85.1 7 77 6.4 6.4 91.5 8 45 3.7 3.7 95.2 9 22 1.8 1.8 97.0 10 16 1.3 1.3 98.3 11 6 .5 .5 98.8 12 4 .3 .3 99.1 13 2 .2 .2 99.3 14 1 .1 .1 99.3 15 1 .1 .1 99.4 16 2 .2 .2 99.6 17 2 .2 .2 99.8 20 3 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SALUD1 Utiliza servicios salud publicos Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 918 76.5 76.5 76.5 NO 2 279 23.2 23.2 99.7 N/C 3 4 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 53 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE SALUD2 Utiliza servicios salud privados Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 428 35.7 35.7 35.7 NO 2 761 63.4 63.4 99.1 N/C 3 11 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TEL Hay telefono en su hogar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 572 47.7 47.7 47.7 NO 2 628 52.3 52.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CD Hay reproductor de discos compactos Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 228 19.0 19.0 19.0 NO 2 971 80.9 80.9 99.9 N/C 3 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 54 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE HMICRO Hay horno de microondas en su hogar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SI 1 169 14.1 14.1 14.1 NO 2 1032 85.9 85.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AUTOS Cuantos autos hay en su hogar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NINGUNO 1 714 59.5 59.5 59.5 UNO 2 377 31.4 31.4 91.0 DOS 3 84 7.0 7.0 98.0 TRES 4 19 1.6 1.6 99.5 CUATRO O MAS 5 6 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COLEG Van a escuelas publicas o privadas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PUBLICAS 1 818 68.1 68.1 68.1 PRIVADAS 2 65 5.4 5.4 73.6 AMBAS 3 32 2.7 2.7 76.2 NINGUNA ESTUDIA 4 278 23.2 23.2 99.4 N/C 5 7 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1200 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 55 PRE-ELECTORAL DURANGO (DGO) JUNIO/95 CAMPO 6/26/95 FRECUENCIAS DURANGO PONDERADAS EN DURANGO.FRE This procedure was completed at 15:10:02 End of Include file.