The raw data or transformation pass is proceeding 169 cases are written to the compressed active file. ***** Memory allows a total of 9998 Values, accumulated across all Variables. There also may be up to 1249 Value Labels for each Variable. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 4 ROLL OVER (10) JALISCO 10/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/13/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JALA0295.PON - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P1 SITUACION ECONOMICA COMUNIDAD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 8 4.7 4.7 4.7 Igual 2 11 6.5 6.5 11.2 Peor 3 144 85.2 85.2 96.4 No sabe 4 4 2.4 2.4 98.8 No contestó 5 2 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P2 SATISFECHO CON NIVEL DE VIDA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Si 1 56 33.1 33.1 33.1 Si parte 2 33 19.5 19.5 52.7 No 3 77 45.6 45.6 98.2 No contestó 4 3 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 5 ROLL OVER (10) JALISCO 10/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/13/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JALA0295.PON PEST6 QUIEN LE INSPIRA CONFIANZA... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 58 34.3 34.3 34.3 A Cárdenas J 2 70 41.4 41.4 75.7 Mario Saucedo 3 4 2.4 2.4 78.1 Ninguno 4 16 9.5 9.5 87.6 No sabe 5 12 7.1 7.1 94.7 No contestó 6 9 5.3 5.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P4 SITUACION ECON PROX AÑO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 62 36.7 36.7 36.7 Igual 2 23 13.6 13.6 50.3 Peor 3 41 24.3 24.3 74.6 No sabe 4 40 23.7 23.7 98.2 No contestó 5 3 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P5 QUIEN PARA PROX GOBERNADOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 56 33.1 33.1 33.1 A Cárdenas J 2 67 39.6 39.6 72.8 Mario Saucedo 3 6 3.6 3.6 76.3 Ninguno 4 3 1.8 1.8 78.1 No sabe 5 25 14.8 14.8 92.9 No contestó 6 12 7.1 7.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 6 ROLL OVER (10) JALISCO 10/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/13/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JALA0295.PON P6 SITUACION ECONOMICA FAMILIA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mejor 1 32 18.9 18.9 18.9 Igual 2 28 16.6 16.6 35.5 Peor 3 105 62.1 62.1 97.6 No sabe 4 3 1.8 1.8 99.4 No contestó 5 1 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PELE7 SI HOY ELECC JAL POR QUIEN VOTA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Eugenio Ruiz PRI 1 55 32.5 32.5 32.5 A Cárdenas J PAN 2 64 37.9 37.9 70.4 M Saucedo PRD 3 7 4.1 4.1 74.6 Otro 4 1 .6 .6 75.1 Ninguno 5 5 3.0 3.0 78.1 No sabe 6 17 10.1 10.1 88.2 No contestó 7 20 11.8 11.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7_1 ACUERDO CON..Pte de la República Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Acuerdo 1 85 50.3 50.3 50.3 Desacuerdo 2 51 30.2 30.2 80.5 No sabe 3 21 12.4 12.4 92.9 No contestó 4 12 7.1 7.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 ROLL OVER (10) JALISCO 10/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/13/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JALA0295.PON P7_2 ACUERDO CON..Gobernador Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Acuerdo 1 90 53.3 53.3 53.3 Desacuerdo 2 59 34.9 34.9 88.2 No sabe 3 14 8.3 8.3 96.4 No contestó 4 6 3.6 3.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P7_3 ACUERDO CON..Pdte. Municipal Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Acuerdo 1 73 43.2 43.2 43.2 Desacuerdo 2 65 38.5 38.5 81.7 No sabe 3 17 10.1 10.1 91.7 No contestó 4 14 8.3 8.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL1 VOTOS A..Eugenio Ruiz O PRI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 15 8.9 19.7 19.7 DOS 2 19 11.2 25.0 44.7 TRES 3 16 9.5 21.1 65.8 CUATRO 4 1 .6 1.3 67.1 CINCO 5 25 14.8 32.9 100.0 0 93 55.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 76 Missing cases 93 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 ROLL OVER (10) JALISCO 10/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/13/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JALA0295.PON PBOL2 VOTOS A..Alberto Cárdenas PAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 15 8.9 16.0 16.0 DOS 2 23 13.6 24.5 40.4 TRES 3 16 9.5 17.0 57.4 CUATRO 4 4 2.4 4.3 61.7 CINCO 5 36 21.3 38.3 100.0 0 75 44.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 94 Missing cases 75 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL3 VOTOS A..Mario Saucedo PRD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 24 14.2 68.6 68.6 DOS 2 7 4.1 20.0 88.6 TRES 3 1 .6 2.9 91.4 CUATRO 4 1 .6 2.9 94.3 CINCO 5 2 1.2 5.7 100.0 0 134 79.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 35 Missing cases 134 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL4 VOTOS A..Otro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNO 1 6 3.6 60.0 60.0 DOS 2 4 2.4 40.0 100.0 0 159 94.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 10 Missing cases 159 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 ROLL OVER (10) JALISCO 10/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/13/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JALA0295.PON PBOL5 VOTOS A..A ninguno Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DOS 2 1 .6 11.1 11.1 CINCO 5 8 4.7 88.9 100.0 0 160 94.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 9 Missing cases 160 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL6 VOTOS A..No sabe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CUATRO 4 1 .6 4.0 4.0 CINCO 5 24 14.2 96.0 100.0 0 144 85.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 25 Missing cases 144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBOL7 VOTOS A..No contestó Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CINCO 5 15 8.9 100.0 100.0 0 154 91.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 15 Missing cases 154 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10 ROLL OVER (10) JALISCO 10/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/13/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JALA0295.PON PATR1 QUIEN ES..Más inteligente Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 61 36.1 36.1 36.1 Alberto Cardenas 2 44 26.0 26.0 62.1 Mario Saucedo 3 3 1.8 1.8 63.9 Ninguno 4 7 4.1 4.1 68.0 No Sabe/No C 5 54 32.0 32.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR2 QUIEN ES..Más experiencia Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 77 45.6 45.6 45.6 Alberto Cardenas 2 45 26.6 26.6 72.2 Mario Saucedo 3 3 1.8 1.8 74.0 Ninguno 4 4 2.4 2.4 76.3 No Sabe/No C 5 40 23.7 23.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR3 QUIEN ES..Más claro para hablar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 67 39.6 39.6 39.6 Alberto Cardenas 2 44 26.0 26.0 65.7 Mario Saucedo 3 4 2.4 2.4 68.0 Ninguno 4 4 2.4 2.4 70.4 No Sabe/No C 5 50 29.6 29.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 11 ROLL OVER (10) JALISCO 10/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/13/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JALA0295.PON PATR4 QUIEN ES..Más cercano al pueblo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 60 35.5 35.5 35.5 Alberto Cardenas 2 57 33.7 33.7 69.2 Mario Saucedo 3 3 1.8 1.8 71.0 Ninguno 4 6 3.6 3.6 74.6 No Sabe/No C 5 43 25.4 25.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR5 QUIEN ES..Mejor opción para edo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 47 27.8 27.8 27.8 Alberto Cardenas 2 63 37.3 37.3 65.1 Mario Saucedo 3 5 3.0 3.0 68.0 Ninguno 4 6 3.6 3.6 71.6 No Sabe/No C 5 48 28.4 28.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR6 QUIEN ES..Más honrado Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 45 26.6 26.6 26.6 Alberto Cardenas 2 59 34.9 34.9 61.5 Ninguno 4 12 7.1 7.1 68.6 No Sabe/No C 5 53 31.4 31.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 ROLL OVER (10) JALISCO 10/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/13/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JALA0295.PON PATR7 QUIEN ES..Más personalidad Gob Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 64 37.9 37.9 37.9 Alberto Cardenas 2 58 34.3 34.3 72.2 Mario Saucedo 3 4 2.4 2.4 74.6 Ninguno 4 4 2.4 2.4 76.9 No Sabe/No C 5 39 23.1 23.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR8 QUIEN ES..Puede resolver pobreza Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 45 26.6 26.6 26.6 Alberto Cardenas 2 47 27.8 27.8 54.4 Mario Saucedo 3 2 1.2 1.2 55.6 Ninguno 4 22 13.0 13.0 68.6 No Sabe/No C 5 53 31.4 31.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PATR9 QUIEN ES..Habla mas con verdad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent E Ruiz Orozco 1 50 29.6 29.8 29.8 Alberto Cardenas 2 49 29.0 29.2 58.9 Mario Saucedo 3 3 1.8 1.8 60.7 Ninguno 4 14 8.3 8.3 69.0 No Sabe/No C 5 52 30.8 31.0 100.0 0 1 .6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 168 Missing cases 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 13 ROLL OVER (10) JALISCO 10/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/13/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JALA0295.PON P8 CUALIDAD PARA EL PROXIMO GOBERNADOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXPERIENCIA-INTELIG 1 51 30.2 30.2 30.2 OPCION DE CAMBIO 2 85 50.3 50.3 80.5 NINGUNA 3 2 1.2 1.2 81.7 NS-NC 4 31 18.3 18.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P9 ACUERDO CON ORDEN DE CAPTURA EZLN.. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACUERDO 1 112 66.3 66.3 66.3 DESACUERDO 2 27 16.0 16.0 82.2 NS/NC 3 30 17.8 17.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - POPI4 OPINION PTE ZEDILLO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MEJORO 1 84 49.7 49.7 49.7 NO CAMBIO 2 31 18.3 18.3 68.0 EMPEORO 3 25 14.8 14.8 82.8 NS/NC 4 29 17.2 17.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 14 ROLL OVER (10) JALISCO 10/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/13/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JALA0295.PON SEX Sexo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent masculino 1 87 51.5 51.5 51.5 femenino 2 82 48.5 48.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDAD Edad Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18-25 1 40 23.7 23.7 23.7 26-40 2 69 40.8 40.8 64.5 41-60 3 49 29.0 29.0 93.5 61 + 4 11 6.5 6.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INST Institución donde trabaja Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 67 39.6 39.6 39.6 gob fed 2 10 5.9 5.9 45.6 paraestatal 3 1 .6 .6 46.2 emp priv 4 42 24.9 24.9 71.0 negocio prop 5 15 8.9 8.9 79.9 independiente 6 34 20.1 20.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 15 ROLL OVER (10) JALISCO 10/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/13/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JALA0295.PON OCUP Activ PEA no activa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ama casa 1 44 26.0 65.7 65.7 estudiante 2 17 10.1 25.4 91.0 jubilado 3 4 2.4 6.0 97.0 desemp 4 2 1.2 3.0 100.0 0 102 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 67 Missing cases 102 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACTIV Rama de actividad económica Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent agric 1 6 3.6 5.9 5.9 industria 2 7 4.1 6.9 12.7 comercio 3 32 18.9 31.4 44.1 construc 4 5 3.0 4.9 49.0 educación 5 2 1.2 2.0 51.0 otros servs 6 50 29.6 49.0 100.0 0 67 39.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 102 Missing cases 67 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUESTO Que puesto ocupa en su trabajo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Empresario, Patron o 1 11 6.5 10.8 10.8 Contratista o trabaj 3 30 17.8 29.4 40.2 Profesionista Indepe 4 8 4.7 7.8 48.0 Emplea, trabaj, Obre 5 53 31.4 52.0 100.0 0 67 39.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 102 Missing cases 67 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 16 ROLL OVER (10) JALISCO 10/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/13/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JALA0295.PON ESCOL Escolaridad entrev Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ninguno 1 5 3.0 3.0 3.0 prim inc 2 18 10.7 10.7 13.6 prim comp 3 32 18.9 18.9 32.5 sec incom 4 9 5.3 5.3 37.9 sec comp 5 28 16.6 16.6 54.4 prep incom 6 6 3.6 3.6 58.0 prep comp 7 27 16.0 16.0 74.0 univ incom 8 16 9.5 9.5 83.4 univ comp + 9 28 16.6 16.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INGRE Rango ingreso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-1 sm 1 12 7.1 7.1 7.1 1-3 sm 2 38 22.5 22.5 29.6 3-5 sm 3 26 15.4 15.4 45.0 5-7 sm 4 15 8.9 8.9 53.8 7-10 5 16 9.5 9.5 63.3 10 + SM 6 25 14.8 14.8 78.1 7 37 21.9 21.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 169 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 169 Missing cases 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 17 ROLL OVER (10) JALISCO 10/FEB/95 TELEFONICA 2/13/95 FRECUENCIAS SIMPLES EN JALA0295.PON This procedure was completed at 11:50:12 End of Include file.